Warno Cinematic (NATO vs. Warsaw Pact): Map - Mt. River - "Infantry, Queen of Battle" (HD-4K Ultra)
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA TITAN RTX
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10850K CPU @ 3.60GHz
Memory: 128 GB RAM (127.87 GB RAM usable)
Current resolution: 3440 x 1440, 50Hz
If you enjoy these videos, please like and subscribe!
Chapters:
0:00 Data Workshop - Warno Cinematic Title Screen
0:25 Operational Briefing
4:04 Start of Match - Mortar teams begin smoke preparation in advance of mechanized infantry assaults on Objective Bravo
4:47 Air lift elements from 82nd Airborne deliver a battery of 105mm field guns to assembly area
5:28 Artillery and mortar battle are assaulted via Soviet air-to-ground combat aircraft
5:46 Convoy of mechanized and air-assault infantry transit into Objective Bravo
7:04 Air assault infantry attempting to secure rally-area within Objective Bravo
7:29 Mountain assault company made up of dethatched mechanized infantry begin their screening traverse
9:39 Armor "spearhead" task force transits through Objective Bravo in initial approach to Objective Charlie
10:40 Elements of the left-corridor armor battalion make their initial approach
11:59 US Air Assault convoy of Rangers and aero-infantry deploy into middle land-bridge
12:53 Air assault elements of AH-64 gunships make their screening approach through the left-corridor
13:43 Air assault convoy of Rangers deploy as advanced guard in forest clearing to secure left-flank of armored battalion advance
14:44 Armored squad attempt to assault Soviet defensive position in factory-area in Objective Charlie
17:08 Main body of armor battalion transit through the left-corridor
18:40 Armor battalion make final approach/assault to the final staging area
19:35 US Ranger/aero-infantry begin their assault/approach to the final staging area with air-assault assistance from AH-1 gun-ships with OH-58s in spotting/recon roles
20:07 Aero-rifle infantry from the initial middle-land bridge landing begin their approach to the final staging area
20:32 Mechanized Infantry garrisoning townlet in Objective Charlie assault adjacent factory on the left
21:05 Armor elements massed from Objective Bravo/Charlie begin their assault of the factory in Objective Charlie forming the main vector from the south
21:35 Aero-infantry traverse the northern plateau in the middle-area assaulting the outskirts of the factory district
21:55 First elements of armor battalion traverse the final plateau and reach the southern outskirts of the left townlet
22:99 Aero-infantry and Rangers from the left-landing zone begin their assault on the left-townlet under smoke cover from field artillery
24:14 Infantry and air-assault element seize middle factory
25:15 Battle for left townlet begin in earnest with infantry advancing house-to-house on main avenue
25:35 Mixed armored force on the right corridor begin their assault on the right-plateau
26:07 Mechanized infantry elements begin to shuttle into the left-townelt
26:39 Battle for the left-townlet center/church area begins
27:33 Battle for the left-townlet center persists
I'll be experimenting going forward with different formatting, as well as expanding the content type. A simple title segment was added, with a short, approx. 3 mins summary of the operational plan for the battle. This is an very rough "alpha" version of the summaries, and will be cleaned up in the future. I'm working on more analytic material in the pipeline, so while that's in the process, we'll knock out some of these low-hanging fruit to update the channel.
One of the largest battles I've simulated in Warno. This started to stress the system, and we'll have to experiment with some overlock/boosting for future matches of this scale (or higher). The match was played post-Lannes and is fought with the new 82nd Airborne Division. The 82nd Airborne has some air-lift capacity with the addition of Chinook-towed 105mm artillery pieces. Hopefully this will be expanded to include other vehicle and equipment air-lift capacity. On certain maps, like "Mt. River", the division operates well, when supported by strategically placed heavy-weaponry like armor, or adequate artillery/missile cover. The 82nd is well equipped at seizing and holding urban environs quickly, and defending those areas with adequate air-cover (though unfortunately, air-cover is not air-lift currently).
If you find this interesting, and want to see more, please like and subscribe!
I wish they had animations for unloading units from helicopters instead of teleporting out
Amen brother ! That being said, I'm pretty happy with most of the other stuff
@@TheDataWorkshop agreed, the game has sorts of details to it that you really don’t notice stuff like the troops teleporting out of transports
i wish this game have a slowly gameplay and more tactical i mean rescue some civilians from a city with bradleys and trucks or some side missions in the campaing ...
At least they don’t have the helicopters disappear like transports for “Airborne” troops in SD44 and SD2
Jesus, I think my blood pressure rose watching this. It is amazing it can compute & display such an enormous quantity of data.
I'm glad you enjoy this, I'm working on the latest one, just doing editing and post-processing stuff! The developers are adding literal city-size maps now with real cities, I can't wait to showcase and study those! It's a great time to be alive for strategy/simulation/history enthusiast!
This was awesome, especially the air battle as the artillery unit was being dropped in. Probably pretty accurate that the attack would start with a furious exchange of missiles overhead and a lot of burning planes. Expensive Apache losses, though. I hope the WARNO developers get rid of the *spin in place* damage effect on choppers, it kinda takes away from the cinematic immersion.
Thank you for the feedback! I'm working on releasing another one, and will look for ways to continously increase the fidelity in future matches. I also agree with the helicopter effects, it looks silly. It's wild this software is technically still in alpha!
Helicopters will do that when either the main or tail rotor go out though the tail rotor is there specifically to counteract the torque of the main rotor so any uncontrolled imbalance between the two will send a helo spinning, generally wildly, however when theyre hit going at full speed that doesnt happen....so that should also be addressed Beautiful cinematics though great vid
Endwar had some pretty good disembarking animations. It was slow, but that was also a slow paced game. I agree tho, there's a lot of room to add things.
Warno looks quite glorious in ultrawide I enjoyed this a lot 👍
Thanks for the sub, I'm glad you enjoyed the match! If you want to an especially cinematic one, check out the video titled "Thunder Run". Eugens IrisZoom engine is a marvel!
@@TheDataWorkshop You're referring to the "Thunder Run" video you created right? Watching it now ty. It is looking good
@@Sandboxcode yep that's it! The last few minutes turned out very nice, it's what I like about Warno (and other well-crafted tactics/strategy games/simulations), the apparently " serendipitous moments when you have the right units together in the right area, you can push through very quickly, the end result is gorgeous!
I love your warno video, I hope you upload it more often
Thank you! I plan to continue with the cinematic content and try to improve the quality, as well as expanding into more detailed assessments of the technical nature of these games as well!
@@TheDataWorkshop I'm really looking forward to it. Also, I like the part that explains the operation at the beginning of this video. I think it'll be good if you keep putting it in
Will do ! I'll see about improving those and thinking about other augmentations down the near the future
sometimes you do not understand youtubes recommandations. but this time, spot on🎉
thank you! I hope I continue to make content you enjoy. I'm also glad the algorithm has connected us together! Feel free to provide any comments/feedback. I am very new to this and am trying to make each new video different and better
@@TheDataWorkshop when the next fase of the attack begins you migth "give" the order over the radio.
@@mgriffioen8503 I'll experiment on doing some intermediate narration in the future. Thank you !
very good works，thanks！
Thank you very much! I am constantly working to improve each marginal iteration. Please feel free to look at my later work and comment on what you like or don't like with the newest process
@@TheDataWorkshop Subscribed with 🔔, will do!
This is just amazing.
Thank you, I'm glad you found it enjoyable!
We spent half our GDP on this one battle, but it was worth it.
When you're actually do u prefer to group units to deploy as platoons or do you send them in individually I generally like to do 4 infantry squad platoon, 3 tank platoons and usually 2 helicopter squadron but support units and recon I keep separate
I never send any units individually. They are designed to be used in coordination with each other, and group sizing is clearly important especially since smaller units cannot reasonably be expected to accomplish certain missions i.e. you would likely not ask a squad to hold a town say as a trivial example
So many units. How did you achieve this? In game settings? Mods?
I'm working on my own mod and these videos are me exploring different elements of it, to gain intuition on various mechanics. I'll expand on it in future entries
The camera work was abit too hectic for me.
How on earth do you even manage the units in this game there are so many!
Thanks for watching! Hot keys, and getting to know the map deeply. Actually similar to how one practices on FPS now that I think of it.
You know….this really was cinematic
thank you very much for this feedback. I'd love to get your feedback on other cinematics I've been making (either good or bad). I'm always trying to improve. I'm glad you enjoyed this video!
Is this done with a mod that adds more unit availability? Great video by the way!
Hey I'm making slow progress, but as we enter the holidays, I will likely have significantly more time to work on this , the videos, and some other surprises. The idea is the mod will have some set of changes/alterations (hopefully most/all non-trivial) that will change the game's use in scale. Part of the problem is play-testing (as you see in my videos), the other is just exploring the toolkit that Eugen has given us is labor-intensive. There's relatively sparse documentation, so a lot of it is literally me changing something, seeing how it works, and then noting it. It can be fun with no deadline, but can be slightly frustrating if you have an idea of what to do a-priori (which we do here obviously). I hope this wasn't a disappointing answer, but with work/life/research etc. taking up so much time, I'm expecting my free time to increase in the next few weeks. Also, shockingly, we are about to hit 500 members in this channel. I'm scripting a channel update when that number is hit along with the community tab, to outline where I think things look like going forward (from a timeline/development/kinds-of-videos/information etc.)
@@TheDataWorkshop Not a disappointing answer at all. Modding sounds both really frustrating and incredibly rewarding at the same time, with a large dose of tedium. If you're up for constructive feedback I did have one thing. I really enjoyed your pre-battle briefing, and I get that in this video when things kicked off you were likely going for the more cinematic view of things (which you succeeded in), but I think it'd be interesting in some videos for you to talk about how your plans and maneuvers are going, adjustments made, enemy response, etc. After awhile of pure action it became a little hard to keep track of what was happening. Keep up the great work!! Looking forward to watching more of your stuff!
@@SPARTANSAM1 thank you so much for this feedback! Reading these (good or bad) are always insightful and welcomed! I'm very new to modding (this is my first attempt/game), but I think it's enriching, especially when combined with learning software technicalities, and on a game that one has domain interests in like Warno! As for the specifics of your recommendations, I absolutely agree. I have not tried an edit where I speak in the middle, but I have tried to add visual cues in my latest two videos throughout the match. Here is an example of one (timestamped) - kzhead.info/sun/daVyoL1vfYqso30/bejne.html This latest video has many multiple points where there are these visual cues that are outlining progress with respect to the plan, though perhaps not enough showing short-falls and communicating those. Do you think the visual could be used in-lieu of verbal communication, or do you think verbal is the way to go ?
makes one million German soldiers vs one million American soldiers
I enjoyed the video. But the music during the briefing is way too loud!
Thank you for the feedback! I'll moderate that in the next one
wauw
Camera movement is way too fast.
I'll take this feedback into consideration. It's hard to capture everything at once, so there's a certain practicality to the speed of the camera panning. I might have to edit, but that adds more time
That looks so overwhelming to control
You get use to it with hotkeys. I highly recommend you try, but with the deliberate study approach. It is a rewarding game
Does anyone think I should buy this game I have money but not sure going be fun I love RTS war games 😅
try wargame red dragon... its better optimized
You should of did a aftermath
That's funny you just mentioned that, I stubbed an after action report in my latest video. I am planning on expanding this section once I figure some things out on the technical side
@@TheDataWorkshop 👍, you should do combat mission Cold War scenarios,and combat mission Black Sea because those games are what you wanting to do in these games but combat mission would be amazing to see
@@abram4806 thanks for the feedback. I own both of those titles, maybe not for cinematic or large simulation projects, but definitely working on custom scenario editing. I'll keep this in mind for the future
I wish dynamic objects couldn't pass through solids - it loses some of the immersion.
Totally agree, the clipping is bad, but as you pointed out in the earlier comment, with so many multiple agents and events happening, I can cut them a little slack on that front. But it's an interesting technical problem on how to reduce it.
Pov your Game the plastic soldiers
everything you seen here also happen in the 1-3rd day of war of ukraine and russia
I'm not sure about that, though i don't have a clear knowledge of that event in detail. The simulated battles we are doing here are Cold War scenarios with two peer late industrial Era militaries. I would think Ukraine does not attempt to go "toe-to-toe" in the way we setup a US / USSR scenario here, as that would be costly and possibly unwise. This is entirely fictitious and of course a game.
@@TheDataWorkshop i know its a game...what i wanted to point out this is... did you ever seen some footage of first day of invasion of russia of ukraine>>> did u saw some footage...it has similarities of it... 100s of choopers flew acros ocean to ukraine while ukraine soldiers tries to shoot down those choppers with missiles... theres a lot of camera footage of it... maybe u try to look on youtube
@@JJrandomVids ah got it. I've not watched much of the footage of the Ukraine War, I am familiar with what you're talking about however, I read about it a few months ago. I have tried often to use air cavalry in Warno but get mixed results. Linking up is hard to accomplish even if your soldiers are only forward deployed only two miles ahead. You can see my early attempt at it in my earlier videos, air cavalry must have strong support to survive and they must have a well defined objective, and ideally, a viable retreat path
Whos playing is this bots or something? and how many?
Nah me and a friend against 4 AI
Who won?! 😂
In the game? Me. In real life? It depends how the war ends, given nuclear weapons, probably no one
ffs this adhd camerawork....
I've definitely tried to make more controlled camera work in my latest videos. Wouldn't mind some critique on those as well
Pakt Warszawski
Alo Polska biało czerwoni
true , as romanian, we were in that Pact until 1989 ,we were "reds"... now in 2022 we are both in other Pact, we are "blues" now :) Poland+Romania , eastern flank of NATO...!
W CAN MAKE THE SCREEN ALOT LARGE??
Ngl i like warno but their UI looks bad imo
This game can't be set in graphic settings, right?
terrible Ranger infil
Was the attempt at all terrible i.e. that one should not have attempted a company size force in that "land bridge" area or do you think it required more preparation of the LZ? Or do you think landing them all en-masse was too risky? Or something else?
ohio basic day:
I don't like NATO terrorism but video is good.
Thank you for liking the video. The game here is not meant to be political, but as a simulation of what could have been, but thankfully, was not. We should all be happy with that fact. I hope with the cinematic showcase we can not only test out our historical knowledge, but see viscerally why such an event would not be desirable for anyone
@@TheDataWorkshop I would be happier with simulations that Soviets could also win.
@@Arhatu I am working on a Wasaw Pact deep operations video, hopefully it represents their doctrine well
@@TheDataWorkshop I liked the short version of it very much.
NATO is really a terrorist. See Ukraine today, they didn't even help.
what mods do u use if u don't mind me asking?
My own mods, I'm playing around with different elements
all this game needs is some civilians and it will be golden.