Top 10 Strongest Navies in the World

2021 ж. 28 Ақп.
5 624 399 Рет қаралды

Armed forces are made up of land, sea and air forces. Naval forces are established for protection against threats coming from seas. So, what are the strongest naval forces in the world?
In this video, we have examined the world's top 10 best Navies .. VSB defense, provides a unique excellent video of data concerning today's world military powers. Over 50 world military powers, (army, air force, land forces, naval forces, special forces) are considered in the ranking which allows for a broad opportunity of comparisons to be achieved concerning relative military strengths.
------------------
VSB defense
✪ Subscribe: goo.gl/Yw7h55
--------------------------

Пікірлер
  • Kiến thức hay quá em đã học đc thêm rất nhiều kiến thức, với mỗi loại tầu kể trên mà có thêm phân thông số kỹ thuật nữa thì chắc chắn sẽ đầy đủ thông tin và hay hơn ạ em cảm ơn

    @toanvu9794@toanvu97942 жыл бұрын
  • ยอดเยี่ยม.เวลาผ่านไปอีก10ปี.เราจะเห็นอาวุธที่ดีขึ้น.สุดยอดขึ้น.อันดับน่าเกรงขามคงเปลี่ยน.สลับไปตามการพัฒนา.สำคัญเงินวิจัย.และเงินจัดสร้างมันมหาศาล

    @pcmcpmroom2262@pcmcpmroom22623 жыл бұрын
    • I’d like to say that’s a fair analysis

      @simonduncan8327@simonduncan83272 жыл бұрын
    • @@simonduncan8327 LOL

      @benamdii1715@benamdii17152 жыл бұрын
  • Next on to top 10 most powerful navy forces part 2 please...

    @sayidmhaiqal1189@sayidmhaiqal11892 жыл бұрын
  • Very. Good. Information. Thank. You.

    @jayanandahalemane331@jayanandahalemane3312 жыл бұрын
  • Depends upon the tactics

    @jaymarpadayao6482@jaymarpadayao64822 жыл бұрын
  • Um quadro impolgante de guerreiros transforma as espadas em relhas de arado. Pôde um homem condicionado a produzir algo diferente? O êxito e respostas demonstra a incompatibilidade e êxito! Cuidar da terra e Tomar conta dela é outro tipo de atitude.

    @johnkennedy1931@johnkennedy19312 жыл бұрын
  • تعزيز القوات الأمريكية في الخليج وخصوصاً السعودية لمحاربت التنظيم الدعشي وتنضيم القاعدة الذي انطلق منها ابو باقر الكصاب الكاظمي

    @user-ey7kf3eg5l@user-ey7kf3eg5l9 ай бұрын
  • Why not include cruisers? They definitely not destroyers or frigates..

    @sulaimanmohid6039@sulaimanmohid60392 жыл бұрын
  • All major international Defence media places Indian Navy in 4th position. So the positioning is seems to be incorrect.

    @narayanankutty9236@narayanankutty92362 жыл бұрын
    • 印度是世界第一军事强国,🇮🇳

      @user-dl3sw8do3z@user-dl3sw8do3z Жыл бұрын
  • You can make a bloody destruction with all these boats.

    @Alexander-tj2dn@Alexander-tj2dn2 жыл бұрын
  • US also has 17 Ticonderoga Cruisers not mentioned.

    @riddler2222@riddler2222 Жыл бұрын
  • Total tarde o temprano vamos todos para el mismo sitio ..y como soñe un dia con San Pedro ...todos seremos iguales ...jajajaaj me la voi a gozar

    @manuellopezvazquez4834@manuellopezvazquez48342 жыл бұрын
  • Je super mať veľké námorníctvo no ešte lepšie mať zbrane čo ich potopia🙂

    @em-ers.r.o.1244@em-ers.r.o.12442 жыл бұрын
    • Ein Drittel aller Schiffe wird untergehen. Also wird es einen sinnlosen Kampf auf dem Wasser geben. Was haben all diese Schiffe in Afghanistan oder in Stalingrad genutzt? Machtgehabe. Wenn du einen Krieg gewinnen willst, musst du an Land gehen, bis in die Städte hinein. Den ersten Krieg, den du gewonnen hast, ist der, den du nicht beginnst.

      @klausbartel4812@klausbartel48122 жыл бұрын
    • Sie haben Recht.

      @em-ers.r.o.1244@em-ers.r.o.12442 жыл бұрын
    • yes,and that's what DF-26 and his family do😂

      @esthwhite8403@esthwhite8403 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@esthwhite8403ASBM/Hypersonic missiles does not work because they can't track targets accurately due to the plasma buildup

      @maxlin3442@maxlin34422 ай бұрын
    • @@maxlin3442 ok, by the way, What would happen if the missile jamming system had to deal with a saturation attack of 100 df26?What if it's a hypersonic missile DF17

      @esthwhite8403@esthwhite84032 ай бұрын
  • This top is based on the number of ships? So why is the UK ahead of France and India when it has far fewer ships and a navy that is not really as powerful as it was a few decades ago ? Its only advantage is to have two aircraft carriers. Even if it's useful, I have a hard time seeing how it can make a navy much more efficient than these two competitors with twice as many ships. (Especially since France has 3 Helicopters carriers). If someone can explain it to me, so that I can understand it better, thank you.

    @Natk0@Natk02 жыл бұрын
    • Naval power is generally equated by tonnage. The French have a lot of small craft, patrol boats etc. It looks good on paper to have more hardware but it is how effective it would be in a naval encounter.

      @mywayorthe7198@mywayorthe7198 Жыл бұрын
  • Cool gemacht wurden aber auch die 2 kreuzer /Schlachtkreuzer der Russischen marine berücksichtig wie die Nackimov oder wie die heißt

    @Rebell971@Rebell9712 жыл бұрын
  • I think the Spanish navy is missing from this list

    @Villarreal863@Villarreal8632 жыл бұрын
  • After the MP committee. 14th Dec 2021 "We're going to need a bigger Navy," Obviously what's happening in Ukraine the Royal Navy does need new ships. And Aircraft carriers fully loaded. Hopefully now they can start building them sooner rather than later.

    @ENGBriseB@ENGBriseB2 жыл бұрын
  • Turkey is the country that builds its own ship and makes its own guided missile (Atmaca). More effective than Harpoon.

    @erdiguler3726@erdiguler37262 жыл бұрын
  • Size means nothing, quality means everything.

    @britishpatriot7386@britishpatriot73867 ай бұрын
  • Strength of a navy doesn't depend on number of ships only....

    @rchung9408@rchung94082 жыл бұрын
    • America owns the sea

      @OneHeroTV@OneHeroTV2 жыл бұрын
    • @@OneHeroTV That's why it can't end Chinese dominance on South China Sea

      @newhope5729@newhope57292 жыл бұрын
    • @@newhope5729 yes American owes the sea

      @henriksandstrom2161@henriksandstrom21612 жыл бұрын
    • @@newhope5729 so do you want them to try? because there will be nuclear warheads flying over your house and radiation all over the globe. Everyone wants to talk about war until its actually time for war

      @voidwalker9223@voidwalker92232 жыл бұрын
    • @@voidwalker9223 Good attempt, but you cannot defend the poor show put up by the US!! Literally a joke they've become....... Especially after the change of leadership

      @newhope5729@newhope57292 жыл бұрын
  • The Italian Navy has also three helicopter carriers, the "Santi" class.

    @gualtierocattaneo2334@gualtierocattaneo23342 жыл бұрын
  • Tudo o que está sobre as águas pode ir ao fundo.

    @ricrey2714@ricrey27142 жыл бұрын
  • I love how the thumbnail looks so photoshopped but it isn’t lol

    @HappyGM-R@HappyGM-R Жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for this information thanks.

    @sudhendugupte7562@sudhendugupte75622 жыл бұрын
  • भारतीय नेवी ७ स्थान पर हैं । 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    @islamforall7550@islamforall75503 жыл бұрын
  • It makes little difference the number of navy personnel.. modern ships are designed now to minimize the number of men on board should they be hit

    @richardgt4100@richardgt41002 жыл бұрын
    • No there not.

      @rayjames6096@rayjames60962 жыл бұрын
  • How many Navy personnel have seen a fellow crew member or civilian killed aboard ship?

    @michaelmaxfield3744@michaelmaxfield37442 жыл бұрын
  • Heart of oak are our ships, heart of oak are our men; We always are ready, steady, boys, steady!

    @colcornish5704@colcornish57043 ай бұрын
  • Most strongest Air Force in the world : U.S.A.F. The 2nd strongest Air Force in the world : U.S.N

    @zhengsng6203@zhengsng62032 жыл бұрын
    • Yes. I saw that crap on American TV. Typical americal lies and propaganda. And some people blindly believe in that without even trying to check that information. Russia is second largest Air force in the world and in some aspects is first even if you add USN and USAF.

      @AlexanderTch@AlexanderTch Жыл бұрын
    • Disagree... 1. CIA & US Space Force. Who knows what they have (see TR3B... kzhead.info/sun/n7eAfKaaap1uY40/bejne.html)? Something had to replace the SR-71 Blackbird! 2. USAF 3. USN

      @chitownlivingston7007@chitownlivingston7007 Жыл бұрын
  • For annual 680+ billion dollars budget get you on top of the list

    @ramal5708@ramal57082 жыл бұрын
  • Interesting to know how the sorting is made ?????

    @stanlefort8584@stanlefort85842 жыл бұрын
  • one MAJOR difference between Chinese and American nuclear attack submarines is that, the Chinese nuclear submarine is loud and the American submarine can detect it. we Americans might consider giving the Republic of Korea and Japan one of our undetectables...

    @halicarnassus834@halicarnassus834 Жыл бұрын
  • India has 3 Minesweeper’s Now Indian Navy get’s new 1 scorpion class submarine

    @vaishaliborkar5570@vaishaliborkar55702 жыл бұрын
    • U.K. = Dreadnaught class neculear submarine are the best in the world

      @noncekilla8848@noncekilla88482 жыл бұрын
    • @@noncekilla8848 shut the full cup

      @rohitb5834@rohitb58342 жыл бұрын
    • @@noncekilla8848 lol

      @Uzbek420@Uzbek420 Жыл бұрын
  • 정보도 충실하고 구독누르고 갑니다.

    @user-rj8yp8ko6w@user-rj8yp8ko6w3 жыл бұрын
    • @Mac’s Jack! We're talking about the navy here, not mortars

      @skyzoun1509@skyzoun15092 жыл бұрын
  • 💪🏻🖤☝🏻Destroyed Egyptian Navy

    @joo9385@joo93852 жыл бұрын
  • Notis: China has 3 helicopter carriers named 075 class,they are as big as amarica class

    @XkMeng@XkMeng9 ай бұрын
  • 🎌❤️

    @nyanko_dearu5125@nyanko_dearu51253 жыл бұрын
  • Indian navy was not founded by the East Indian company .....but Kanoji Angre.....the great Maratha naval admiral......who is the father of naval maritime who ,even East Indian company could not achieve in its life time .....

    @yatishyelgulwar6597@yatishyelgulwar65972 жыл бұрын
    • Have you ever heard of the name Chola and his navy ?

      @slayersaravanan6992@slayersaravanan699211 ай бұрын
  • I really love your show

    @yawgyasi2171@yawgyasi21712 жыл бұрын
  • 03:15 East India Comp. ... Jack Sparrow left the chat

    @leokal1237@leokal12372 жыл бұрын
  • How does the Italian navy make this list. Every ship would have propellers, one forward and two to go in retreat.

    @graeme9668@graeme96682 жыл бұрын
    • This is not funny, however our navy is powerfull.

      @alessiomasi5229@alessiomasi52292 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣

      @adityasinghjadoun6675@adityasinghjadoun66752 жыл бұрын
  • 반갑습니다. 영상잘보고갑니다. 늘건강하시고 유투브도 승승장구하시길 응원합니다.👍

    @tv9944@tv99443 жыл бұрын
    • お前は嘘艦隊

      @kato12241224@kato122412243 жыл бұрын
    • @@kato12241224 but your Vietnamese

      @user-vg7vt8qu3n@user-vg7vt8qu3n Жыл бұрын
  • Only 4 Jin class and 2 shang,i think incorrect data.

    @insomnia5462@insomnia54622 жыл бұрын
  • Biar bagaimanapun semangat nya...dan kemenangan tempur tidaklah semata dari taktis perang,tetapi dari keyakinan dan strategi perang...Salam buat ABRI-ku di kepulauan Natuna.

    @riqq2744@riqq27442 жыл бұрын
    • پس ایران ابر قدرت دریاست

      @user-ne3rd1kc4n@user-ne3rd1kc4n2 жыл бұрын
    • Jangan berkecil hati. Pulau-pulau kita adalah kapal induk kita🤣🤣

      @skrmshr5703@skrmshr5703 Жыл бұрын
  • for Italy we add the new aircraft carrier, or multi-role the TRIESTE Armament. Modification The unit features latest generation weapon systems. As regards the artillery sector, there are: 3 Otobreda 76/62 multirole cannons (two in the bow and one in the stern) of the Super Rapido MF Davide type, with guided ammunition and predisposition for the new Vulcano ammunition; 3 machine gun turrets with remote control OTO Melara 25/80 equipped with a 25 mm Oerlikon KBA cannon (25x137mm); 2 OTO Melara ODLS-20 rocket launchers for launching underwater and aerial deceivers (electronic lures). The missile sector, on the other hand, includes: provision for 4 vertical launchers (VLS Sylver) with 8 cells (two forward and two aft) for a total capacity of 32 Aster 15/30 missiles [12]. The sensor section will also boast very advanced technologies: PAR SPN-720, precision approach radar, 3D volumetric system capable of tracking 300 tracks and 12 targets simultaneously, range over 200 km; Radar Kronos Power Shield (AESA in L band), a multifunction surveillance system, with a range of 1 500-2 000 km; IFF SIR-M-PA, secondary radar for the identification of ships and aircraft; Kronos dual band radar (DBR AESA 4FF): C band (Kronos Quad - Fitted For) and X band (Kronos StarFire); TACAN AN-553 / N, for precision approaches and sending information to aircraft in flight; EWS "Zeus" system, developed by Elettronica SpA, equipped with an extremely powerful based on solid state TRX GaN modules. The electronic discovery component (EW) is integrated with a RESM (Radar Emission Interceptor), RECM (Radar Deceivers) and CESM (Radio Communications Interceptor) effective both in the high seas and in coastal waters, with a maritime surveillance and evaluation of the advanced situation through advanced ELINT and COMINT features, up to an innovative SEI algorithm; Automatic system for the direction of combat operations SADOC 4

    @GiuseppeMeledi@GiuseppeMeledi2 жыл бұрын
    • So che l'Italia è uno stato fondatore NATO ma è meglio che la chiamiamo nave da crociera😉. non facciamoci scoprire forti e ben armati

      @vincenzo9419@vincenzo9419 Жыл бұрын
    • Too many details. That's no good.

      @ernestobonanni5127@ernestobonanni5127Ай бұрын
  • 2019 U S A 10 , 000 , 000 U S A DOLLAR TO EACH CITIZENS .

    @vile105@vile1053 жыл бұрын
  • I like this strong forces

    @ioanbota9397@ioanbota93972 жыл бұрын
  • Lets see what the Constellation class brings to the table for the world

    @1987phillybilly@1987phillybilly Жыл бұрын
  • У кого лучшая космическая разведка и космическое оповещение, и кого больше гиперзвуковых ракет, тот и победит. Вот с этого надо было всё подсчитывать.

    @mixiglo@mixiglo2 жыл бұрын
    • Тут сравнивают флота, а не кто победит. Не путай теплое и мягкое

      @user-fr8lo1ru8o@user-fr8lo1ru8o2 жыл бұрын
    • Ты много Киселёва и скобаеву смотришь

      @user-zd1xq6ob7y@user-zd1xq6ob7y2 жыл бұрын
    • Что такое "космическое оповещение"? Можешь сформулировать? Ну остальной бред даже комментировать стрёмно

      @bgd414@bgd4143 ай бұрын
  • A good video, but it missed out several classes of warship. For example, the Russian battlecruisers, which are considered the biggest surface combat ships in the world and the main threat to American carrier groups. In addition, there is American cruisers which are larger than destroyers. They provide a command platform, as well as possessing very large numbers of anti ship missiles. Plus two of the helicopter carriers of the Japanese Navy are being converted into true aircraft carriers.

    @luke.morris.redfern-hardis9338@luke.morris.redfern-hardis93382 жыл бұрын
    • Light VTOL aircraft carriers. They wouldn't even have ski jumps. But yeah, the rest of JMSDF is pretty damn terrifying.

      @death_parade@death_parade2 жыл бұрын
    • Battlecruisers were retired after ww2, and they suck as they are big ass boats with big unreliable guns and very slow. It is a cruise missile paradise. Edit: ever thought why no one else uses it?

      @mukundvashisht6226@mukundvashisht62262 жыл бұрын
    • And Ukraine pretty much proved Russian battle cruisers are worthless

      @dennismills6887@dennismills6887 Жыл бұрын
    • @@death_parade With the inclusion of F35B 5th Gen fighter planes, they don't need a runway or ski jumps to lift off.

      @Veiljustin83@Veiljustin83 Жыл бұрын
    • Russian Navy have very old ships poorly maintained, When war breaks out, they aren't as reliable as you thought they are. See what happens to their Tanks in the invasion of Ukraine.

      @Veiljustin83@Veiljustin83 Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent and Quality for America England France Canada Spain Italy Germany Turkey China Japan India

    @pakinpakinn8819@pakinpakinn8819 Жыл бұрын
  • Only plane-carriers can help a country to keep its oversea interest. Submarines are metal coffins. --- Jie Song, 2021 April 28th At 11:57.

    @jiesong7069@jiesong70693 жыл бұрын
  • The US Military has Machine shops too, ( plus over 18,000 CNC non military machine shops in the U.S.) If needed, the Military could give them work.

    @manfredgedeik3124@manfredgedeik31242 жыл бұрын
    • could the machine shops move to south china sea if needed and give them work?

      @josephguo6256@josephguo6256 Жыл бұрын
    • @@josephguo6256 China's navy is small fry. Would only take the US 7th fleet to wipeout China's entire navy and air force combine.

      @ParallelComparison@ParallelComparison Жыл бұрын
  • all this battleship will destroy our world one day.....

    @magoutdoorxtvt8972@magoutdoorxtvt89723 жыл бұрын
  • Excelent video ⛴

    @albertvicic1816@albertvicic18162 жыл бұрын
  • Hoje eu vejo o quanto o Brasil está vulnerável em termos de segurança militar, não bastasse isso temos uma FFAA que está mais preocupado o próprio bem estar dos seus membros que com o território brasileiro sendo facilmente utilizado em manobras políticas. E não será nesse desgoverno que a sigla FFAA deixará de ser Forças Acomodadas Brasileiras. 😮

    @ThePedroevaristo@ThePedroevaristo10 ай бұрын
  • Taiwan section, The KIDD Class Destroyers never served in the UK Royal Navy

    @barrycharlessearle5253@barrycharlessearle52532 жыл бұрын
  • Strange, if you add up all the US Navy ships by class you get only 223.

    @barabbasrosebud9282@barabbasrosebud92822 жыл бұрын
    • Add up any of the figures for any country on this list and it doesn't match the total number because they only list certain types of ships.

      @rayjames6096@rayjames60962 жыл бұрын
    • True, but that under counts the total because of so many support ships. These are not in the "official" count and are not "USS" ships, but "USNS" ships that are considered "auxiliary" vessels run by the Military Sealift Command and similar groups. An example is the fast command support ships, designated "AOE". There is one accompanying every Carrier Strike Group. There are about 130 of these ships not counted in this video. There are also several dozen ships in the "Ready Reserve Fleet."

      @mrschuyler@mrschuyler Жыл бұрын
  • Respect

    @Respect-vt7uv@Respect-vt7uv2 жыл бұрын
  • Sorry but how could it be that a country without carriers is ranked higher than one who does. This is completely inconsistent

    @lucaandreacolombo2710@lucaandreacolombo27102 жыл бұрын
  • Keren keren kapalnya 👍

    @yusufmartapura6702@yusufmartapura67023 жыл бұрын
  • some of these rankings make zero sense lol

    @NorthCamZ@NorthCamZ3 жыл бұрын
    • True

      @rishikeshdora4594@rishikeshdora45942 жыл бұрын
  • 6:10 地雷戦艦❔❗ どんな代物か、どう考えても想像出来ない。

    @stepsoftime@stepsoftime Жыл бұрын
    • 機雷除去する、掃海艇じゃないのかな?

      @user-nc8qw1tu1v@user-nc8qw1tu1v Жыл бұрын
    • @@user-nc8qw1tu1v 「海に設置する地雷=機雷」と言う解釈でしょうか? となると「戦艦」の部分はどうとれば宜しいでしょう。 Wikipediaでは「戦艦(せんかん、英:battleship)とは、軍艦の艦種の一つで、大規模な砲撃戦で強力な相手に打ち勝つことを目的に設計された軍艦である。軍艦の中でも最も強力な艦砲と堅牢な装甲を持つ」と標されて居ります。この「艦砲」と「装甲」にあたるものが掃海作業を行う艦艇に搭載された事例は無いと思いますし、艦艇の大きさからしてチワワとセントバーナードを同じ基準で捉える様な事になりかねませんか?

      @stepsoftime@stepsoftime Жыл бұрын
  • I find it weird that almost every Navy has a thing for the classic dress whites, how come of every military force we still look like cartoon characters in cute sailor uniforms

    @Ashleymaul@Ashleymaul2 жыл бұрын
  • FAZ UM VIDEO DO BRASIL, VOCÊ EXPLICA BEM 👍👍👍......

    @alexbuffon1192@alexbuffon11923 жыл бұрын
    • It's going to be very challenging to take down China's Navy, considering the fact that China has 777 ships.

      @edwardoalvarez5566@edwardoalvarez55663 жыл бұрын
  • Not only quantity but also quality should be put to rank.

    @LJHuang-jn8bj@LJHuang-jn8bj3 жыл бұрын
    • If only quantity was considered, China would be way ahead of the US and any other country. Also, not only quality and quantity, but also availability is also very important. How many of those ships are full operational. This is the official ranking from “Military Today”. Not many complaints about it.

      @TheFlyingMochi@TheFlyingMochi3 жыл бұрын
  • Mu hahahahaha OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO a new record is coming BAYBEEEEEEEEEE...I liked this video yes!!!! 👍😅

    @Lita1@Lita1 Жыл бұрын
  • Why don't you mention that 65% of the US Naval fleet will be due for retirement very soon and after that where does it leave US as a maritime naval power?

    @ozfrancis2445@ozfrancis2445 Жыл бұрын
  • Japan is No.2

    @electronbashful540@electronbashful5402 жыл бұрын
  • US Navy is just on a totally different level compared to the rest

    @lszujo73@lszujo733 жыл бұрын
    • Yes , they are useless

      @union310@union3103 жыл бұрын
    • @union So is your country!

      @JR-jk5wz@JR-jk5wz3 жыл бұрын
    • @@JR-jk5wz Considering mine had the largest empire in the world, wasn't scared to take on two world wars whilst others watched. We ended slavery , we gave the world the industrial revolution and so much more. What did yours do?

      @union310@union3103 жыл бұрын
    • @@union310 NEVERMIND Union didn’t read your response correctly! I thought you meant we USA are useless! 🤣🙌🏻

      @JR-jk5wz@JR-jk5wz3 жыл бұрын
    • @@JR-jk5wz The USa is useless , it is built upon lies. Your schools teach about the war of independence yet your universities acknowledge if Britain wasn't at war with most of the EU at the same time Britain would have never left america, yes that is right left. They left to fight the two amassing fleets from spain and france that threatened the very seat of home. You also never mention that Britain marched across america with a few divisions after that and burned down your civic buildings and seat of power. Then theres the hollywood re write , the enigma machine , fury etc. Etc. Your whole country is built upon a lie. Research just those two to see that . Then there is the internet another american attempt at a re write. The world has no respect for you , your presidents have been a joke and a few dictators have you by your pants. You never have or ever will be an empire. To top things off ,you are the most racist country on earth. Then the statue of liberty , what a joke! That great symbol of American independence. Yet it was the Freemasons who paid for that , it wasn't a gift from france like you believe. Two masons in a pub decided to make it. Then they funded it through collecting cash in lodges and later in raffles. The only part america had to play was to make a foundation and they didn't even manage that . The stone had to come from Britain with British masonic money because americans didn't want it.

      @union310@union3103 жыл бұрын
  • Japan, Britain, and the United States are supposed to be the world's three largest navies.

    @masako-je4cu@masako-je4cu2 ай бұрын
  • great video and background music

    @raymondcaldwell8403@raymondcaldwell84032 жыл бұрын
  • 今はF-35Bを発着できるよういずも型護衛艦2隻とも空母化改修工事をしています

    @user-dn7yn5tv7f@user-dn7yn5tv7f2 жыл бұрын
  • The West and East naval doctrine are different. You cant compare apple and orange

    @mansorosir5878@mansorosir58782 жыл бұрын
  • Video was uploaded 6 months only and the updates are decades behind than present.

    @M.Ack11@M.Ack112 жыл бұрын
  • You need to consider blue water navy capability.

    @nasunoyoichi5253@nasunoyoichi5253 Жыл бұрын
  • 臺灣也能擠進10名? 真棒😄

    @LinLin-uk5xs@LinLin-uk5xs3 жыл бұрын
    • 我也惊呆了🤯

      @heidemann4795@heidemann47953 жыл бұрын
    • 对呀,其实第10是土耳其,台湾不可能进的😅(无恶意,只是说实话)

      @tsloo1620@tsloo16202 жыл бұрын
    • @@wu1205king 拉倒吧,世界上總共那麼幾個能排上軍事實力的國家,何況台灣連國家都還不是。有臉說強

      @heidemann4795@heidemann47952 жыл бұрын
    • @@wu1205king 东亚怪物圈

      @user-qd6xr1ip1y@user-qd6xr1ip1y2 жыл бұрын
    • @@wu1205king 那不是你邻居,那是你们的亲爹。。不孝啊。。

      @xiaoyulin4008@xiaoyulin40082 жыл бұрын
  • Helicopter carreirs China Navy

    @leonardoferreiraassis7979@leonardoferreiraassis79793 жыл бұрын
  • These ships never served in the Royal Navy. They were offered to the Royal Australian Navy, but the deal fell through. They only served in US Navy before Taiwan bought them.

    @PeterJackson-dr4pm@PeterJackson-dr4pm Жыл бұрын
  • Forgot to list cruisers. lIsted destroyers and smaller and listed amphibious ships and larger but no cruisers. Now in the commentary they mention Ticonderoga class cruiser...but funny enough they call these cruisers destroyers.

    @dave_ecclectic@dave_ecclectic2 ай бұрын
  • 9:31 is not correct. China has 37 Destroyers in Service at this moment. Other 6* Type 055 and 7* Type 052D are still in sea trial. So the figure "50 destroyers" is only valid when all of them enter service.

    @supernodream@supernodream3 жыл бұрын
    • 42 by the end of the year.

      @longmarch2668@longmarch26683 жыл бұрын
    • China is a paper 🐅. Tai wan will leave the cccp grabbing their ass.

      @charlesstepp2083@charlesstepp20832 жыл бұрын
    • @@charlesstepp2083 in your dream

      @user-by2wg3si3d@user-by2wg3si3d2 жыл бұрын
    • @@charlesstepp2083 آمریکا نیز کاغذ است و الا در جنگ های افغانستان و ویتنام شکست نمیخورد

      @matinalipour1566@matinalipour15662 жыл бұрын
    • @@user-by2wg3si3d ??

      @WateeroRoblox@WateeroRoblox Жыл бұрын
  • Love you from India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳

    @laxmanrajwar966@laxmanrajwar9662 жыл бұрын
  • Juntadlos a todos....Venid para España.....Y hacemos nuevos arrecifes en el Mediterráneo, Cantábrico y Atlántico. Por BLAS DE LEZO, GRAVINA, CHURRUCA.....Y Los magníficos Marineros e Infantes que actualmente tiene este País. Ánimo.

    @ismaelliarterodriguez2175@ismaelliarterodriguez2175 Жыл бұрын
  • India have 2 aircraft carrier, I aircraft is on water trial

    @zelokamei4916@zelokamei49162 жыл бұрын
  • 🇹🇷🐅🦅 Cesaret bütün silahlardan üstündür. Yurtta Sulh Cihanda Sulh. ATATÜRK .

    @turkogluturk310@turkogluturk3109 ай бұрын
    • Yaşşa Koçum...

      @Kemal-io6zi@Kemal-io6zi4 ай бұрын
  • I believe that the strength of the Navy is entirely determined by its submarine capabilities and anti-submarine capabilities. Isn't the United States and Japan, which have excellent anti-submarine capabilities and submarines, stronger than China and Russia?

    @jjj__306@jjj__306 Жыл бұрын
    • "you believe", well its not the truth. All capabilities are equally weighted.

      @rohitb5834@rohitb5834 Жыл бұрын
    • 中国は置いといて、最近のロシアを見ていると海軍の整備や技術にちょっと疑問を覚える

      @user-zj4mc7wf1h@user-zj4mc7wf1h Жыл бұрын
    • @@user-zj4mc7wf1h 不用谈 你只要知道他们有世界三大真理 能瞬间把你们从地球上抹去就行了

      @user-yx5gg9eb9d@user-yx5gg9eb9d Жыл бұрын
    • @@user-zj4mc7wf1h China #1 intellectual theft😂😂

      @cconghhong@cconghhong Жыл бұрын
    • not true at all, submarines are much more vulnerable than you think, their good as long as there not detected, but if found can easily be targeted by things like anti- submarine warfare helicopters

      @alexmcinnes5930@alexmcinnes5930 Жыл бұрын
  • Royal Navyって名前が格好良すぎる。

    @aaa-ur2nx@aaa-ur2nx Жыл бұрын
  • Yes I looking see for time so all people

    @user-ui4mz4zu3k@user-ui4mz4zu3k9 ай бұрын
  • Я был бы счастлив, если бы все нави всех стран пару лет не играли попусту мышцами а прибирали плстмассу в океане. Вот это НАВИ и ГОРДОСТЬ!!!!!!!

    @user-in9cr1wv8v@user-in9cr1wv8v2 жыл бұрын
    • You’re very right bro

      @mybedcavour8104@mybedcavour81042 жыл бұрын
  • The only British dominance to the other countries in 2021 is the Strategic nuclear submarine. Their destroyers are being repaired, only one of them is in service. And there are not enough f35 for their carriers. Therefore they must lean on the American military support. And British naval strength Has been overstated

    @alfredip1151@alfredip11512 жыл бұрын
    • Embarrassed Queen.

      @user-qg5uv5ji5m@user-qg5uv5ji5m2 жыл бұрын
    • You are wrong, they are not over stated unlike the other navies that reach 100-700 assets listed. It's because the royal auxiliary fleet are not included. In other navies their auxiliary fleet are listed among their navy assets. And also the size of navy depends on tonnage and quality not quantity.

      @himbisaquatics@himbisaquatics2 жыл бұрын
    • We have loads of f35s in order but the yanks are slow builders. The UK is currently building 4 new nuckear missile submarines, 3 atack submarines, 18 frigates and loads more.

      @camhunt7310@camhunt73102 жыл бұрын
    • At the moment the Royal Navy is getting future generations of warships built. By 2030 24 modern Frigates and destroyers. And new nuclear submarines are all ordered.

      @ENGBriseB@ENGBriseB2 жыл бұрын
    • @@camhunt7310 The UK picks the delivery time for their F-35s. It is their schedule. They will receive the final of the remaining 24 they have on order at the end of 2025. Australia has more F-35s than the UK right now.

      @rayjames6096@rayjames60962 жыл бұрын
  • Talk about the air force please...

    @sayidmhaiqal1189@sayidmhaiqal11892 жыл бұрын
  • Good One. 4 Navies to support No. 1 - USA. 2 Neutral - Nato. 1 Neutral to 2: Russia & China. Thanks.

    @benjaminrush4443@benjaminrush4443 Жыл бұрын
  • Wrong...china already has one 075 heli carrier on duty and another 7 coming along. The 055 cruisers are at least 8. Two are already in service, the Nanchang and the Lhasa....

    @michaellou7101@michaellou71013 жыл бұрын
    • THERE NAVY IS NOT A PROVEN NACY AT ALL,,,HOPEFULLY THERE WILL BE NO WAR , IF THERE IS , I AM AFFRAID THAT THERE WILL BE A NUKE WAR,,,SAY BYE BYE

      @lamarsidoner3250@lamarsidoner32502 жыл бұрын
    • 快说那是用来打鱼的 😂

      @zobenny8290@zobenny8290 Жыл бұрын
  • Forza Italia 🇮🇹

    @lorenzopes9866@lorenzopes98663 жыл бұрын
    • Respect Italy. I'm from Turkey.

      @sahipkran6738@sahipkran67382 жыл бұрын
  • in what position is the Brazilian Navy?

    @gabrielgeroldi4495@gabrielgeroldi44953 жыл бұрын
    • 25...

      @user-qr5yq8cj2y@user-qr5yq8cj2y2 жыл бұрын
  • Américans and alliés WE understad your play

    @dinocamo8110@dinocamo81102 жыл бұрын
  • 9:40 I believe this photo is not Chinese navy

    @hlew2694@hlew26943 жыл бұрын
    • You are right... That's the Thai Navy

      @get4084@get40842 жыл бұрын
  • It's funny how far down Canada has fallen in ranking from 1960 when it had the 3rd largest navy in the world.....

    @bradjames6748@bradjames67482 жыл бұрын
    • I never knew Canada had a big navy before

      @royalnavyrulebritannia5717@royalnavyrulebritannia57172 жыл бұрын
    • That was only possible because the rest of the world was destroyed by the war so most of their efforts were in rebuilding. Canada has decent navy for its size rn

      @minggus9649@minggus96492 жыл бұрын
    • canada doesnt even need a military cuz they are buddies with the us

      @keshimars@keshimars2 жыл бұрын
  • outdated and 10years old information for some specific countries

    @HimanshuYadav-ik7ce@HimanshuYadav-ik7ce3 жыл бұрын
  • top 10 best infantry !

    @namefamilyname1029@namefamilyname10292 жыл бұрын
    • brits be top .... less in numbers but what ever regiment still equal or above other countries elite forces , Not up with most countries special forces but British special forces are up above the rest

      @simonelsey@simonelsey2 жыл бұрын
KZhead