The De Havilland Mosquito

2013 ж. 27 Қыр.
751 165 Рет қаралды

The story of the development, introduction and deployment of the De Havilland DH98 Mosquito in this official De Havilland documentary.

Пікірлер
  • I have a friend who is 97 years old now and he flew 254 missions as a navigator in mosquitos. I salute you Sandy

    @johnrandall4809@johnrandall48097 жыл бұрын
    • As do all right thinking people. Thank you, Sir, for your service.

      @tallandhandsome29@tallandhandsome294 жыл бұрын
    • Me too !!! Say thanks to Sandy for me.

      @richardputz3233@richardputz32334 жыл бұрын
    • My father helped build the first one....and others at DHs at Hatfield....

      @KathrynLiz1@KathrynLiz14 жыл бұрын
    • jondavi123 _

      @juliane3683@juliane36834 жыл бұрын
    • John Randall z

      @enriquemartin1845@enriquemartin18454 жыл бұрын
  • I thought I knew my WW2 aircraft but I had completely overlooked the strategic importance of the mosquito until seeing this documentary. A multi role aircraft predominantly made from wood and produced in kit form in a cottage style industry from all corners of the uk so that no one attack could wipe out its continued production. Excellent film. Might have to visit my local model shop and build something for the cabinet !

    @KevinBenson-xx4id@KevinBenson-xx4idАй бұрын
  • The finest war bird of ww2. Hearing and watching a mosquito low pass at 400mph with those two merlin v12's flat out is a sight to behold and enough to send shivers down your spine..

    @Draxindustries1@Draxindustries14 жыл бұрын
  • I didn't know just how brilliant the Mosquito was. Fantastic

    @camrenwick@camrenwick6 жыл бұрын
  • Thinking outside the box for this brilliant design and concept.

    @BRaff-hl4ip@BRaff-hl4ip3 ай бұрын
  • A fine history of a wonderful airplane by a great aircraft manufacturer. De Havilland's concept of lightness and speed proved very successful and adaptable for many roles. Plus, it's one of the most beautiful aircraft produced in WWII in my opinion. Building it out of plywood was genius and saved the project from being scrapped in 1940. Good show, lads.

    @prsearls@prsearls4 жыл бұрын
  • In college I had a summer job at a clothing store, where one of the salesmen was a British chap who had flown Spits during the Battle of Britain. He still limped a bit from having bailed out over the channel during one of his many encounters. But he flew again. One of the nicest guys I ever met. Very humble about it all.

    @billjordan6963@billjordan69634 жыл бұрын
  • If the Spitfire had two engines it would have been the Mossie. What an elegant aircraft. Nothing like good old British craftsmanship in both aircraft and cars. If there ever was a car that could be compared to the Spitfire it would be the XKE Jaguar. This is coming from a Yank who had a Blackpuddlian dad who introduced me to Airfix models, Cadbury chocolate and the privilege of driving his 1966 XKE. RIP dad. Eee by gumm!

    @Liddledriver@Liddledriver3 жыл бұрын
  • one of the greatest things i have seen on youtube..thank you for posting..even as a young lad making airfix models of the mossie i knew it was a special aircraft..cheers

    @bordebomb6631@bordebomb66318 жыл бұрын
    • BordeBomb66 i

      @marilyncamilleri2697@marilyncamilleri26976 жыл бұрын
  • As a young boy in London ,Ontario,Canada,I can still hear the scream of those twin Merlins!

    @alexanderball923@alexanderball9234 жыл бұрын
  • About 35 years ago, a friend (in the US) visited a British air museum and returned with a recording of a preflight (audio) checkout, which he played back on his high-fi with a pair of 100-watt speakers. Mesmerized teens drifted away from their music in the basement to feel to feel the body pounding acoustic vibrations from the Mosquito as it went through the checkout procedure while warming the lube oil equally in both engines before accelerating down the runway -- and blowing out the preamp on the recording device -- very impressive. I suspect that many enthusiasts would appreciate a link to that recording if one could be found.

    @johnedwards3621@johnedwards36216 жыл бұрын
  • What an amazing aircraft, possibly the most effective of WW2 it seems nothing could catch it and its ability as a multi role aircraft were unequalled. We should have made 1000s more.

    @RicTic66@RicTic666 жыл бұрын
    • 😅😊

      @mohdfadzil6636@mohdfadzil66365 ай бұрын
  • When i heard of there wood construction a while back i was amazed. But now i wonder why they always talk about how the spitfire saved the day. In my view the Mosqhito was the best engineered plane ever. It wasnt just a fighter. It was everything and put together in wood workshops. What an amazing feate of Engineering and abillity.

    @seeker1432@seeker14324 жыл бұрын
    • I agree. Today it would be called a multi role aircraft. Way ahead of its time. Herman Goering watched them with envious eyes "And now they have an aircraft that is better than anything we can produce and can be made by any woodwork shop on the country"

      @kenwheeler6150@kenwheeler61504 жыл бұрын
  • Im so glad this film is available to watch , what an insight into how they were made .

    @tomthompson7400@tomthompson74004 жыл бұрын
    • What a pleasure to read about the Dehaveland Mosquito. My father, Pi Pienaar flew a Mosquito during the war on reconnicence missions over Germany. He was the first to encounter a Meschersmit 262 over Munich, was attacked 10 times after being hit, flew back to Italy, made a belly landing and survived. I a. Writing this as an 80 year old son of the pilot!!

      @pinepienaar4133@pinepienaar4133 Жыл бұрын
  • just an outstanding film, thank you for this vid. The astounding ingenuity of De Havilland's engineers using balsa wood, low production costs, a gorgeous frame even by today's standards and at what, a 1% or less casualty rate...?....there should've been 50,000 Mosquitos built.

    @SanderAnderon@SanderAnderon4 жыл бұрын
    • Sitka spruce from Canada…not balsa from Central America

      @davidjose707@davidjose7072 жыл бұрын
  • Nowhere else in the world would you get a village carpenter making aircraft parts......just genius!

    @g2macs@g2macs7 жыл бұрын
    • Well, that may have been a bit exaggerated for propaganda purposes, but there is little doubt individual carpentry businesses did make a contribution. More so the larger furniture businesses in places like High Wycombe, which were already turning out mass-produced furniture: they were very easily switched to direct aircraft production in quantity: something the enemy would never have thought possible (and some British brass-hats might well have agreed with). Moreover, as the film states, many repairs were within the competence of an ordinary carpenter, who might have been in the RAF, or who would have already been tooled up and been informally drafted in to help at the local base, probably as a DH subcontractor.

      @allenwilliams1306@allenwilliams13064 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@allenwilliams1306. Yes Allen and there is a book published called the 'History of Aviation in High Wycombe' I think which mentions the furniture industry here (about 100 factories back then?) and how it changed during WW2. Some of these companies made parts for the Mosquito and further up Amersham Hill in High Wycombe is a place named De Havilland Close I think.

      @jimlassen9422@jimlassen94224 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@jimlassen9422 Is it not so that Goring was infuriated ( as well as amazed) by this extraordinary plane and declared that 'Every piano making firm in England is making them!'...Being a ww1 veteran ace, he understood the virtues of planes with a lot of wood in the design. So, he wanted a German version made, which wasn't easy to accomplish. The TA 154..But he was a man obsessed and even called his version Mosquito. How unoriginal...But no, there were probs in their design, never got past proto level.

      @ingridclare7411@ingridclare74113 жыл бұрын
  • I should like to add my voice to the many here and say this is a thoroughly marvelous and interesting documentary - especially the "live" footage of the low level RAF raid. The statistics on the Mosquito's success are truly astounding! I had never realized! Many thanks!

    @warplanner8852@warplanner88527 жыл бұрын
    • the british are not gods

      @robertsullivan4528@robertsullivan45286 жыл бұрын
    • No not gods, but damn close though.

      @capcolombie3834@capcolombie38346 жыл бұрын
    • @@robertsullivan4528 No which makes their achievements all the more awesome.

      @lenfirewood4089@lenfirewood40894 жыл бұрын
  • Now THAT'S an impressive aircraft! It's so rare that a machine that can do so many jobs can do all of them so well.

    @drawbridge611@drawbridge6113 жыл бұрын
  • Hawarden airport had one in the flying school hangar next to the Chippy's and Tiger...i remember looking inside the bomb bay...it still had the carpenters pencil marks on the woodwork

    @jefflloyd9319@jefflloyd93194 жыл бұрын
    • What a great story.

      @thethirdman225@thethirdman2253 жыл бұрын
  • A recent anonymous and quite scurrilous copyright claim against this public information video has been dropped following my appeal. Many thanks to KZhead..

    @gb5uq@gb5uq8 жыл бұрын
    • That's good to hear mate, we need things like this.

      @psmiddx2096@psmiddx20967 жыл бұрын
    • gb5uq

      @douglasjerue7027@douglasjerue70277 жыл бұрын
    • gb5uq

      @rudiraeymaekers@rudiraeymaekers7 жыл бұрын
    • Ach, Kuheim, schatz -mindestens wissen wir wer und wo du bist. Hundedreck

      @9VBGI@9VBGI7 жыл бұрын
    • Anyone with any religion is a bit of a worry. Luckily people believing in sky fairies are becoming the minority around the world and a good thing to. Socialist EU countries. Oh you mean the wealthy ones with a high standard of living and culture it would be a pleasure to live and work in. They have a terrible thing like universal healthcare for everyone, good retirement options, very low crime rates etc. Clean safe countries with high levels of education. Yes the opposite of the US in every respect and much better for it.

      @mbaker335@mbaker3356 жыл бұрын
  • An outstanding aircraft that punched way beyond its class, an engineering wonder of its time.😃👌👌👌👌

    @terrystephens1102@terrystephens11024 жыл бұрын
    • Terry Stephens get a woody every time I see one 😋😉

      @TheMelbournelad@TheMelbournelad4 жыл бұрын
  • My Great Grand Father flew Beaufighter for 60 sorties and was shot down twice, he then flew 280 sorties in Mosquito without issues, he then flew Tempests being shot down once by ground fire , he died in his bed aged 96, his favourite plane was the Mosquito but he never went into details of his missions as he lost to many friends

    @alanwayte432@alanwayte4324 жыл бұрын
    • May he rest in peace and light perpetual shine upon him. Amen

      @maryrafuse2297@maryrafuse22974 жыл бұрын
  • This is a truly awesome, thorough documentary of the Mosquito. There are so many memorable images included. Thankyou so much for the upload!!

    @soppdrake@soppdrake7 жыл бұрын
    • A brief appearance of “Catseyes” Cunningham, and featuring the Eindhoven raid on the Philips factory, which was, of course, an important source of instruments and components for the Nazi war effort. Thoughtfully, the management of Philips had transferred all the most militarily sensitive operations to its British factories before the war started, and was as un-cooperative as possible with the occupiers, unlike some other Dutch businesses such as C&A. The Philips management knew the raid was coming, and advised on which bit of the factory should be attacked to secure the best outcome, trying to protect its workers as far as possible in the process.

      @allenwilliams1306@allenwilliams13064 жыл бұрын
  • My father flew a mosquito onetime from Bendigo to Laverton in Victoria. Elapsed time from wheels off to touch down was 10 minutes flying at tree-top height. He said it was quite a ride with those huge Merlins roaring away and the props level with the cockpit. He said the acceleration on the mosquito was very impressive.

    @leeosborn4641@leeosborn46415 жыл бұрын
    • Lee Osborn haha - acceleration was “impressive” sounds like British understatement standards at its best.

      @TheMelbournelad@TheMelbournelad4 жыл бұрын
  • 39:58 best landing field image of all! Great video, great story, great country, great plane and pilots!

    @grannyblinda@grannyblinda4 жыл бұрын
  • I am very impressed how quick engineers of all types managed to advance concept to product in such short time. They must have been very skilled and worked very hard.

    @KevTheImpaler@KevTheImpaler8 жыл бұрын
    • It was down to the tea - they used to create special batches by storing the tea in a damp place for a week then slowly dried out naturally - this created a special fungus which when brewed had psychotropic properties stimulating creative parts of the brain.

      @lenfirewood4089@lenfirewood40894 жыл бұрын
    • And there were plenty.

      @SuSiMa1lu@SuSiMa1lu4 жыл бұрын
    • @@lenfirewood4089 Ha ha ha!

      @allenwilliams1306@allenwilliams13064 жыл бұрын
    • @@lenfirewood4089 Where, pray tell, may I purchase a pound or two of this tea? Or at least, the recipe for making same at home.

      @reecenewton3097@reecenewton30974 жыл бұрын
  • 10mins and 16 secs in...the gent in the drawing office is my great uncle Sydney Webb. He had been working for G de Havilland since 1912 at Hendon.

    @janeholden995@janeholden99510 ай бұрын
  • Thanks for the video! And the tiny original mention of Canada. Built a lot of them at DeHavilland in Downsview in Toronto, Canada. Canada and Canadians contributed a hell of a lot to the war, be it manpower, ships, planes. Not to mention the AVRO plant in Malton, turning out Lancs, etc. Where did Britain get the birch? Ah, Canada. A lot of Women flew them over the Atlantic.

    @teaeff8898@teaeff88986 жыл бұрын
  • My mother helped build Mossies at Downsview, soon to be a part of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    @swamprat69er@swamprat69er4 ай бұрын
  • GREAT TO FLY I FLEW IN EGPYT. NO PLANE LIKE IT THANKS FOR WHAT YOU HAVE DONE FOR US.

    @TheRAFfc@TheRAFfc7 жыл бұрын
  • Sandy died last year and he always though and felt sorry for his leading the bombers to Dresden, ironically his nurse at the hospital was the daughter of one of the survivors of that terrible fire storm in Dresden john R

    @johnrandall3455@johnrandall34554 жыл бұрын
  • Undoubtedly the most feared allied aircraft of the war from an axis point of view. It did not matter where, what time of day or at what height you were the prey of these exceptional machines.

    @sheikhyaboooty@sheikhyaboooty9 жыл бұрын
    • sheikhyaboooty A few years ago I read a German soldiers account of time in Normandy after D-day landings. He said he and his comrades always feared the Mosquito's because they were dangerous at low level, appearing just over tree-tops at high speed, or bombing from great heights. He recalled one incident when a solitary tiny silver plane appeared over head at about 30,000 feet. Suddenly there was a huge explosion nearby, and they all knew it was a Mosquito.

      @MrDaiseymay@MrDaiseymay9 жыл бұрын
    • The prey of those exceptional machines were largely civilians. Schools, hospitals, railway stations and civilian housing. The aim of those 'nuisance' raids was to draw defenses away from key targets giving the 'heavies' a greater chance of success. In reality all that was achieved was the deaths of tens, perhaps hundreds of thousands if innocent men women and children in what amounted to nothing more than a terrorist bombing campaign. I see nothing to celebrate anymore. After seven years research into the life and times an Canadian Mosquito pilot killed in 1944 for his biography I felt I could no longer in all conscience continue the work as the magnitude of the horror and depravity of the allied bombing offensive became more abundantly clear by the facts I uncovered. Facts which are now thankfully becoming more widely known and understood. The rose tinted view of heartless unfeeling sociopaths nostalgic for war and it's mechanical contrivances of mass killing and destruction sickens me now, I wish I never started. Were it not for the more than half a million that have viewed the video I would take it down. "History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there." - George Santayana.

      @gb5uq@gb5uq4 жыл бұрын
    • @@gb5uq meanwhile, just what to you think the Germans and Japanese with their allies were doing? I suggest you take another look at what total war against a ruthless cruel enemy actually means. Besides which to state "The prey of those exceptional machines were largely civilians. Schools, hospitals, railway stations and civilian housing" is highly misleading bordering on subversion and treachery.

      @gordonfrickers5592@gordonfrickers55924 жыл бұрын
    • @soaringtractor - "3rd March 1941 - Bosombe Down - Mosquito W4050, 2x Merlin 21 engines...Preliminary performance and brief handling trials... service ceiling is roughly determined as 34,000 feet." London, Kew National Archives, AVIA-18/716, page 5. discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C4075609 You`re welcome.

      @CalumDouglas@CalumDouglas3 жыл бұрын
    • @@CalumDouglas Do yourself a favour and ignore soaringtractor/Wilbur Finnigan and whatever other names he uses. He hates British fighting men and the aircraft they flew, despite the fact that half his own country supported Hitler until they saw the light, while the British had been fighting them for years. He hates the fact that the Mosquito was better than any twin of the war.

      @thethirdman225@thethirdman2253 жыл бұрын
  • Just before the 26 min mark some nice clips of 105 squadron which joined with 8 Group PFF in June 43. The wing commander is John Wooldridge DFC DSO who was also a screen writer and composer who wrote and produced the 1952 Dirk Bogarde film Appointment in London, the story of a Lancaster bomber pilot.

    @gb5uq@gb5uq10 жыл бұрын
  • This is the best film on the Mosquito I've seen

    @lindsayfog5246@lindsayfog524610 жыл бұрын
    • Lindsay Fog n

      @brianlatham1013@brianlatham10136 жыл бұрын
    • N))

      @brianlatham1013@brianlatham10136 жыл бұрын
  • My Gramps flew DH -98's in the RCAF. My Grams built Mossie's in London Ontario. He loved it!!!

    @canusakommando9692@canusakommando96926 жыл бұрын
  • The British had the best looking aircraft of ww2,great doc,best one yet.

    @Blitz98K@Blitz98K6 жыл бұрын
    • If it looks right, it is. And it was.

      @SuSiMa1lu@SuSiMa1lu4 жыл бұрын
    • Makes me climax every time 👌😏 one seriously sexy bird I tell ee

      @coralbay00@coralbay003 жыл бұрын
  • after the war this company built the world's first jet airliner, after dealing with metal fatigue problems, (caused by pressurerising the aircraft ) it paved the way for todays airliners, i flew in the COMET mk 2 ...great aircraft.

    @anthonyfrost2530@anthonyfrost25303 жыл бұрын
  • when I was in air cadets our CO had done flight training in a tiger moth. he was saying on days with a strong head wind they could actually fly backwards relative to the ground.

    @russelloriely6343@russelloriely63437 жыл бұрын
    • Yes, and if you flew one at night, someone might put a candle outside, and the damn thing would fly in circles around it. But only if the wind isn't strong

      @paulstandeven8572@paulstandeven85727 жыл бұрын
    • Before the war my father built one plane out of two Moth's, he told me the same thing a strong head wind and he could go backwards, when war broke out his plane was taken by the ait force to train pilots!

      @vicharder3227@vicharder32274 жыл бұрын
    • Actually a whole ship can go backwards while running full tilt forward in certain tidal areas where the entire sea is moving backwards!

      @Beemer917@Beemer9174 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent documentary with that nostalgic feel of the era's film making. As for the famous and venerable Mosquito ... one SUPERB aircraft, from concept to warrior. As fierce as it was fast. Thanks QB for bringing it here.

    @Querencias7@Querencias76 жыл бұрын
  • Many thanks for posting this excellent video, a remarkable aeroplane, one of the best aeroplanes of WWII, and of course British , I have the original on Video, so I will have to watch it again.

    @453421abcdefg12345@453421abcdefg123456 жыл бұрын
  • ingenuity at its best. what an amazing plane,the more they asked of her,the more she took,bombs,drop tanks,machine guns,why not cannons too,or maybe an artillery piece ?sure,some rockets too,why not ?all out of wood keep in mind, nothing short of incredible!

    @mynameis9057@mynameis90576 жыл бұрын
    • YES, THE STORY IS INCOMPLETE WITH MENTIONING ALL HER ARMOURY. e.g THE 6 LB CANNON, THAT DESTROYED SO MANY SURFACE SHIPS AND SUBMARINES , WITH IT'S SOLID HARDENED STEEL SHELL'S ETC.

      @MrDaiseymay@MrDaiseymay3 жыл бұрын
  • This an excellent film. It shows the clarity of thought and purpose in the design. It also covers how they built strength in at minimal weight, which I think was the real genius of the Mosquito. This gives a real insight into the design process

    @TheSideband@TheSideband10 жыл бұрын
  • Such a good design. Such brave men. Total respect

    @hairflick6537@hairflick65374 жыл бұрын
  • I've been blessed to see one of these beauties in person. Awesome plane.

    @daveakingsley@daveakingsley7 жыл бұрын
  • Without doubt the most beautifull aircraft of WWII in my opinion. And the most versatile too. Build from wood it also was easy to build by skilled carpenters and could take a lot of punishment. At the moment I'm buiding the Tamiya 1/48 model of the bomber version. The 1/32 Tamiya model is in the pipeline, but this one I'm gonna build in the fighter version. Thanks for uploading from a "Mossie" lover.

    @Brera011@Brera0118 жыл бұрын
    • How old are you?

      @peterharwood1430@peterharwood14307 жыл бұрын
    • I'm 62, and now retitered thus plenty of time for modelling. The 1/32 scale Mosquito is almost finishes now :D

      @Brera011@Brera0117 жыл бұрын
    • Ronald VAN TOL Agree

      @joaoigayara6034@joaoigayara60347 жыл бұрын
  • Great old documentary. Thanks for putting it up.

    @jonnyh9388@jonnyh93885 жыл бұрын
  • ME 109 pilots readily admitted they had nothing but respect for their Spitfire counterparts. Those that encountered Mosquitos configured with 4 303s & 4 20mm, readily admitted they would do anything needed to never run into them again.

    @pfrstreetgang7511@pfrstreetgang75119 ай бұрын
  • My Farthing in law was one of the designers of the wings for the Mosquito. In Christchurch Dorset Then he was sent to Coventry and Halifax. (War Work). He witnessed the blitz on Coventry As time goes by: I worked with a Flight Sargent who fly them. Also a Flight mechanic. He told me that after the service. He had to go up for a test flight… The pilot had full clothes… he said I had shirt sleeves (frost bite) I worked for Halls Bros in Whitefield in the 1980’s (Halls Mentholiptus).. The factory, before the war was a CO-OP furniture Factory, requisitioned for war work. They made the Plywood frames for the Mossis

    @alanwhitworth659@alanwhitworth6598 жыл бұрын
    • My Half-penny-in-law could do twice as muchl as your "Farthing-in-law"

      @Baskerville22@Baskerville224 жыл бұрын
    • @@Baskerville22 But why would nobody talk to the farthing-in-law? What had he done?

      @allenwilliams1306@allenwilliams13064 жыл бұрын
  • It goes for both the RAF & the USAF. The Mosquito carried (from what I'm given to believe) the equivalent to the other, bigger bombers including the the US bombers. Only 2 crew members & no armament. It could carry a 4000 bomb load, at a faster speed than anything else in the sky. Flown at zero ft it was under the radar & difficult to shoot down. 2 Rolls Merlins bolted to a wardrobe. What a flying machine.

    @oldgitsknowstuff@oldgitsknowstuff6 жыл бұрын
    • John Sadler и.

      @robertdeherckenrode7298@robertdeherckenrode72986 жыл бұрын
    • Yup, flying out of Banff, to Norway, they flew at 10 ft above the waves at night. ! crazy. More losses on take off and landing than in the air I was told. Wet grass runways caused many accidents, wheels break off and exit is under the plane, not good.

      @bobsymons9642@bobsymons9642 Жыл бұрын
  • Bit of a non-sequieur, but did you notice that near the beginning, a scene of GDH with his design team, a cup of tea is being passed along from person to person. How very British.

    @howardmaryon@howardmaryon4 ай бұрын
  • Clearly no one back then could be creative without a cigarette!

    @trooperdgb9722@trooperdgb97224 жыл бұрын
    • Trooper DGB bit like now without computer/phone or coffee 😜

      @TheMelbournelad@TheMelbournelad4 жыл бұрын
  • 12:25 ...thanks for documentary ... really interesting from a point of view of product design and construction process. Really good shape, great style. Very aerodynamic shape.

    @yorhekin6186@yorhekin61867 жыл бұрын
  • At 29 minutes, tree and roof height hopping, that is low and at some speed, they were bloody good pilots they were.

    @hubs37@hubs376 жыл бұрын
    • Indeed they were marvelous lads

      @marvinbeasley6346@marvinbeasley63464 жыл бұрын
    • returning Mosquitos often had small branches of foreign trees in their undercarriage.

      @MrDaiseymay@MrDaiseymay3 жыл бұрын
  • A great record of a great aircraft. Thank you.

    @molai1961@molai19616 жыл бұрын
  • No mention in the film of the Mosquito "pathfinder" night missions over German cities. Proceeding the multi-hundred Lancaster and Halifax bombers, the incendiary bomb-laden Mosquitoes dropped their small payloads to illuminate target zones. The Luftwaffe countered these advanced strikes by using their excellent Heinkel Uhu (owl) night fighters. The British countered this by escorting the pathfinder Mosquitos with radar equipped Mosquito night-fighters.

    @fredericklee4821@fredericklee48216 жыл бұрын
  • British engineering and design at its best.

    @slipnpitch1894@slipnpitch18947 жыл бұрын
  • I am an ex RAF aircraft fitter and also a pilot, I adore these aircraft! I thought i had found a way to get a flight in the last airworthy Mosquito......then i noticed she is in Australia the other side of the world so out of my reach 😢 Due to the fact they were wood none remain in existence i believe except the one in Ozz😕 If you want to watch good films about these in the war get yourself 633 Squadron And Mosquito Squadron! Very similar films but LOADS of flying footage!👍🏻 British ingenuity using furniture makers to build them. Sadly no aircraft are made in Glorious England anymore except some small light aircraft........what has happened to our once Great country 🇬🇧

    @scopex2749@scopex27494 жыл бұрын
  • Mosquito mk.XVI: crew of two, range 1.500 miles with a 4.000 lb bomb load, maximum speed 415 mph cruising speed probably about 300 mph. Boeing B-17: crew of 10, range 800 miles, 4500 lb bomb load (long range), maximum speed 287, cruising speed 182 mph. I often wonder what if the USAAF would have split that single B-17 crew in two-men flight crews and flew much larger numbers of the mosquito in stead of the B-17. Even with the original bomb-load of 2.000 lb, the shear numbers would increase "pay-load" delivery, at higher speeds, longer range and less risk for the crews.

    @roykliffen9674@roykliffen96749 жыл бұрын
    • You are wrong on the range of the B17 iw was closer ti 1800 miles with 4,000 lb bomb load.. and it could fly at 30,000 ft.. nice try...

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21429 жыл бұрын
    • I'm willing to concede I may have made a mistake in interpreting the extensive data on the B-17 as described by Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_B-17_Flying_Fortress), which DOES state a range of 800 miles for long range missions, while at the same time claiming 2000 miles with 6000 lb of bombs elsewhere in the spec's, I will maintain that the sheer speed and smaller crew for comparable range and load, still the makes mosquito the better plane

      @roykliffen9674@roykliffen96749 жыл бұрын
    • Roy Kliffen..... IF the B17 only had a 800 mile range....how did they fly to Berlin and back??? 1800 to 2000 miles is more like it..and they produced twice as many B17's and three times as many B24's...

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21429 жыл бұрын
    • That's why I conceded that point. I missed that flaw in Wikipedia data in my original comment. Still leaves the smaller crew, higher speed, similar payload and less use of metal per plane. The resources used to build all those B-17's and B-24's could also have been used to build much more mosquitoes, and even then not enough to use all the crewmen used for those B-17's and B-24's.

      @roykliffen9674@roykliffen96749 жыл бұрын
    • The USA Had plenty of Aluminum, did not have to worry about alternate building materials.

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21429 жыл бұрын
  • wonderful film with some great war footage.

    @ProfSimonHolland@ProfSimonHolland6 жыл бұрын
  • Great film, thanks for uploading

    @matthewdobson5593@matthewdobson55934 жыл бұрын
  • I believe there was no more versatile aircraft built in WWII, let alone any war since, like the Mosquito. Brilliant engineering and use of materials.

    @pepecohetes492@pepecohetes4928 жыл бұрын
    • yup

      @234cheech@234cheech8 жыл бұрын
    • it was also a durable, tough plane. You had a much better chance of survival flying one than in any other.

      @paulstandeven8572@paulstandeven85727 жыл бұрын
    • For sure. Some brilliant lateral thinking and designing by Geoffrey Dehavilland and his team.

      @smooth_sundaes5172@smooth_sundaes51727 жыл бұрын
    • pepe cohetes

      @kenarndt7425@kenarndt74256 жыл бұрын
    • F-15 maybe?

      @5678sothourn@5678sothourn6 жыл бұрын
  • Sir Geoffery was a brilliant engineer and leader. He has what we Yanks and Brits have lost. Fortitude!! We rather whine and point fingers than grab our bollucks. Then march on like men.

    @dennisbell8253@dennisbell82536 жыл бұрын
  • Well done documentary on a remarkable airplane. Thank you.

    @larrysteimle2004@larrysteimle20042 жыл бұрын
  • I recall The History Channel, of many years ago, did a TV program on the Mosquito, where I recall in particular an RAF pilot that flew that bomber in WW II . . . where he said that he never flew another airplane after the war in civilian life, simply because the Mosquito was such a superb aircraft to fly, where he implied that flying any other prop driven aircraft would be a letdown in comparison.

    @bloqk16@bloqk164 жыл бұрын
  • An incredible aircraft. Plywood, and fast as lighting. I would have loved to have fought in one during WW-2, had I not been born in 1945.

    @genegarren833@genegarren8336 жыл бұрын
  • DeHavilland was my great grandfathers designer, when WW1 finished Airco was sold and my Great Grandfather set up DeHavilland in business

    @stuartcrane9409@stuartcrane94094 жыл бұрын
    • Old DeHavilland works buildings still in use in Christchurch, Dorset. Airfield at rear now built on.

      @vulgivagu@vulgivagu4 жыл бұрын
  • The Mosquito was fabulous for it's day.

    @granskare@granskare4 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the interesting and educational video. If I were a pilot, and wealthy enough, I would own an operable Mosquito. I am a yank, but from what I have read in WWII books and seen on youtube, I have a soft spot for the Mosquito. These planes and their pilots, saved a lot of lives, contributed greatly to ending the war, and were, possibly, again from what I have read, the best at keeping their crews alive, because of their speed, dependability, and great handling.

    @wmden1@wmden1 Жыл бұрын
  • 32:22 the mosquito carried a 4000 pound bomb load. That was the long-range, high-altitude bomb load of the B-17. The B-17, on shorter distance missions at lower altitude might typically carry 8000 pounds internally. The mosquito compares favorably to the B-17 for long-range missions. That's amazing given the relative size of the two aircraft.

    @IamDoogy@IamDoogy4 жыл бұрын
    • "During the Normandy campaign, RAF squadrons committed a monthly average of not quite three hundred Mosquitos. From June through August, seventy were shot down and twenty-eight damaged beyond repair-33 percent of the total available." www.historyonthenet.com/british-ww2-aircraft

      @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38024 жыл бұрын
    • @Phil Allison As I understand it Fighter bomber Mosquitos had a loss rate similar to that of other RAF aircraft operating in the fighter bomber role. Mosquitos were purpose built for specific roles and only about 1,000 were built as unarmed bombers and only some of those were modified to carry the 4,000 lb. "cookie", a metal drum filled with explosive and used almost exclusively for "nuisance" raids. B. Mk IV 283 built Night bomber using Merlin 21 or 23. Bulged bomb bay fitted to some to allow carriage of 4,000 lb bomb internally. Max speed 380 mph, max weight 21,462 lb. Twenty seven built as B.Mk IV modified for PR role www.baesystems.com/en/heritage/de-havilland-mosquito

      @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38023 жыл бұрын
    • FB. Mk VI 2,305 built. Fighter bomber/intruder variant using Merlin 22, 23 or 25. 4 (Browning) machine guns and 4 (Hispano) cannons, plus 2 x 250 lb bombs carried internally & underwing carriage of up to 2 x 500 lb bombs. Could be fitted with underwing rocket projectiles or drop tanks instead of external bomb carriage. www.baesystems.com/en/heritage/de-havilland-mosquito

      @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38023 жыл бұрын
    • Production of British Aircraft By Year www.wwiiequipment.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=116:british-production-of-aircraft-by-year-during-the-second-world-war&catid=48:production-statistics&Itemid=61

      @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38023 жыл бұрын
    • The B17 max internal bomb load was 6,000lb, not 8000lb. The external bomb load was a max of 8,000lb. The range with a 14,000lb bomb load flying at 25,000 feet was 790 miles, with only an internal bomb load, 6,000lb, flying at 25,000 feet, the range was 1,040 miles. As a reference, London to Berlin in air miles is approx 600 miles.

      @jamesfinlay8180@jamesfinlay81803 жыл бұрын
  • It was 2 years after the introduction of the Mosquito that the DH Vampire flew using the DH Goblin turbojet which also powered the first USAAF jet aircraft. The Vampire also had wooden components although not as extensively as the Mossie

    @chollocks@chollocks4 жыл бұрын
  • the devolement of this aircraft would make a great movie

    @yeshua31617@yeshua316177 жыл бұрын
    • Indeed. A long movie with plenty of sorties after the design and build replaying the greatest missions. Man that to me would be better than pearl harbour.

      @coralbay00@coralbay003 жыл бұрын
  • Fantastic film and amazing aircraft. I think it says alot about British industry that the most brilliant aircraft they made in the war, and the quickest from drawing board to mass production, was constructed using essentially pre-industrial techniques and materials, by 400 small self employed subcontractors on piece-work. English craft skills at their most ingenious. And I bet those subbies did well out of it, - making essentially furniture in their living rooms and selling it to the Air Ministry at war prices I would have liked to have a piece of that. Here's some pocket money son help me out on this :-)

    @Sdblahm67@Sdblahm676 жыл бұрын
    • Ssblahm The Mossie was NOT the fastest from design to manufacture. Mustang was done in 117 days and Lockheeds first jet the P80 was also about 120 days !!! !

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21425 жыл бұрын
  • What a beautiful history of GOD'S guiding hand.

    @garymcaleer6112@garymcaleer61126 жыл бұрын
  • One of the best planes of WW2. Thank you

    @zoompt-lm5xw@zoompt-lm5xw7 жыл бұрын
  • The best information and description of forcible aircraft. Great video thanks for sharing it

    @captainjackkay3132@captainjackkay31322 жыл бұрын
  • i just love the narrator, he's ace

    @n1bbler123@n1bbler1239 жыл бұрын
  • This is really my favourite Channel! Thanks for your nice Videos, it is very enlightening, Waiting for your latest update. De Havilland 'Mossie' Park

    @YourHomeTorontoRealEstate@YourHomeTorontoRealEstate2 жыл бұрын
  • The most capable aircraft of ww2 , the envy of Air marshal Goering from the Luftwaffe .

    @bruceburns1672@bruceburns16727 жыл бұрын
    • Even Germany recognized the worth and success of the ‘Mosquito’ by introducing the Ta 154 late in the war, not many made & certainly not very successful!

      @jeffpollard7304@jeffpollard73044 жыл бұрын
    • Why ? He could hardly fit into the cockpit.

      @Baskerville22@Baskerville224 жыл бұрын
    • "..ONE OF the most capable aircraft of WW II.." Let's not get carried away now, chaps!

      @warplanner3258@warplanner32584 жыл бұрын
    • @@warplanner3258 The most is apt

      @hoatattis7283@hoatattis72834 жыл бұрын
    • @@warplanner3258 Bomb load of 4000 lbs vs B17 of 3500(agreed that the B17 carried a greater variety) fighter, submarine buster with the cannon, recon, night fighter, precision bomber, pathfinder, and LANDED/ TOOK OFF from a carrier. IMO the number 2 is the B25. Couldn't be a fighter or recon, but also fitted out with cannon and took off from a carrier. Both great aircraft

      @seaotter52@seaotter524 жыл бұрын
  • Innovative. It's a shame less than 5 are flying today. Great footage.

    @MegaBakerdude@MegaBakerdude6 жыл бұрын
  • What this neglects to mention is that the Air Ministry was looking at the use of timber prior to the outbreak of WW2 as they realised that the metals used in aircraft construction would become overstretched, unless overseas construction could be carried out such as was done in Canada (and outside of the Empire in the USA). The Albemarle was IIRC was the only other timber aircraft to see service, and that was less successful than the Mossie, as it came too late for its intended role and ended up mainly in the glider tug role. It was only in the Far East that the Mossie was less successful as the glue was affected by the high humidity.

    @neildahlgaard-sigsworth3819@neildahlgaard-sigsworth38197 жыл бұрын
  • loving the proper English narrative here, back in the day when English was spoken in an educative tongue, seems gone forever now. I say old chap, anyone for tea and crumpet? oh yah!

    @davidmarshall1259@davidmarshall12598 жыл бұрын
    • +Michael Bond Wizard prang, what?

      @mgytitanic1912@mgytitanic19128 жыл бұрын
    • Michael Bond Damned good show Old Boy. I wish they wouldn't keep taking the letter U out of words. Get's right up my nose.

      @mgytitanic1912@mgytitanic19128 жыл бұрын
    • + DAVID Marshal crumpet, singular, means something else.....

      @paulstandeven8572@paulstandeven85727 жыл бұрын
    • Look up the Monty Python 'RAF banter' sketch for an appropriate laugh or two.

      @ralphpichie696@ralphpichie6967 жыл бұрын
    • Very crisp and clear. I love this accent. And for that reason I pronounce english this way. A lot easier than american dialect.

      @SuSiMa1lu@SuSiMa1lu6 жыл бұрын
  • My grandfather worked for de Havilland in research and development and became a deferred tradesman during the war and worked on the first prototype at Salisbury hall Hertfordshire.

    @ianfarrow6912@ianfarrow6912 Жыл бұрын
  • this video is incredible

    @clifflane6456@clifflane64566 жыл бұрын
  • German had tried a similar high speed wooden fighter bomber, the Ta-154 dubbed the "Moskito". But it failed miserably as the Germans did not fully understand the concept like the British do

    @alphaadhito@alphaadhito6 жыл бұрын
    • @Letocetum sulley The Germans had pretty much an endless supply of Rolls Royce Merlins...

      @MarsFKA@MarsFKA4 жыл бұрын
    • @@MarsFKA How so?

      @lenfirewood4089@lenfirewood40894 жыл бұрын
    • @@lenfirewood4089 From shot down Lancasters...

      @MarsFKA@MarsFKA4 жыл бұрын
    • @@MarsFKA Well it wasn't an endless supply then.

      @lenfirewood4089@lenfirewood40894 жыл бұрын
  • My late uncle Jack Weir was radio operator navigator on mosquitos flying from Leuchars to Sweden in unarmed civilian marked planes. They would load up the bomb bay with ball bearings and then take off. They would then circle up as high as they could before flying over Norway for home losing height as they went to try and outrun the FW190s.

    @ronaldweir712@ronaldweir7124 жыл бұрын
  • @25:30 That is what I call an RAF moustache.

    @KevTheImpaler@KevTheImpaler8 жыл бұрын
  • a brilliant aircraft. I saw one fly years ago. Very moving.

    @bigDbigDbigD@bigDbigDbigD6 жыл бұрын
    • Me too. Saw one at Old Warden in 1991.

      @thethirdman225@thethirdman2253 жыл бұрын
  • I think I saw this film - or one very like it - way back in 1962/63 when I was at school. We had an aeronautical society, and you could borrow films in those days free except postage for schools. Saw all the old SBAC Farnborough films as well. Great days. And it was a state school, so no privileged treatment, in case you ask!

    @DrivermanO@DrivermanO4 жыл бұрын
  • BRAVO!!!!! So well done! ❤❤❤❤

    @bradleyb.425@bradleyb.4259 ай бұрын
  • Love this fighter bomber in the film, 633 Squadron.

    @Polyglot71@Polyglot716 жыл бұрын
  • I luv the fact that this Aircraft gave , Piano / Cabinet / joiners a Job and probably unskilled People as well ..good Vid.

    @salvagedb2470@salvagedb24702 жыл бұрын
    • Smith & Jones chair makers--- wing builders.

      @petegarnett7731@petegarnett7731 Жыл бұрын
  • The Germans thought so much of the Mosquito they decided to build one of their own, stealing the design from downed aircraft. Things were moving along smoothly until one night a group of Lancasters got off course and ended up bombing the German's GLUE FACTORY!! That ended the Kraut Mosquito.

    7 жыл бұрын
    • Fine bit of history, Walter Strong. Thanks!

      @bperry9088@bperry90887 жыл бұрын
    • True they bombed the Tego-Film glue factory in Wuppertal which in turn led to Heinkel use a substitute glue of inferior quality which not only affected the TA 154 ´´ Moskito´´ project but also the He 162 Salamander Jet Fighter.

      @mac163@mac1637 жыл бұрын
    • Walter Strong, The Ta-154 was a German all-wooden twin engined fighter called the Mosquito. They built several of them. They didn't work. DH Mosquitos were made from spruce and balsa wood. Balsa is not a strategic material, but it is exotic, especially if you are a WWII German.

      @Rev6044@Rev60447 жыл бұрын
    • Horace Hogsnort brilliant! Is that fact? Great story...

      @handyvickers@handyvickers4 жыл бұрын
    • Whoops! Sorry! We accidentally bombed a useless glue factory and saved the world. My bad.

      @matthewk6731@matthewk67314 жыл бұрын
  • I had no idea the Mosquito was such a versatile aircraft!

    @michaelogden5958@michaelogden5958 Жыл бұрын
  • What a great design, great performance

    @crustycobs2669@crustycobs26693 жыл бұрын
  • My dad was a cabinet maker in Tottenham who made bits for plane and my uncle worked draftsman in de Havilland I was in Hatfield as baby where factory is great plane

    @JaniceAldrich-ed2zx@JaniceAldrich-ed2zx3 ай бұрын
  • Beautiful, elegant and fast. I have several old plastic models completed as reconnaissance and fighter/bomber types. There are some real Mossies still around. Calgary is not too far away if it is to see a flying Mossie. Is it just me, or do I hear "Flight of the Bumblebee" or "The Green Hornet" whenever I see one flying?

    @teto85@teto854 жыл бұрын
  • Truly a great insight to the development and operational roles of this outstanding aeroplane. My second cousin way older than myself was in 264 Squadron. Film was a great insight for me. THANKS👌🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

    @neilwilliams2409@neilwilliams24093 жыл бұрын
  • WOW SO MUCH HATE going on here both please be aware that all the allies gave there all young men who died way to young so you can live freely and enjoy vids on tou tube please be respectful of others they would had they lived

    @paulstewart7529@paulstewart75296 жыл бұрын
    • The ignorance, immaturity and hate is sickening these soyboys of today would NEVER in a million years have the class bravery and courage of the men of the greatest generation.

      @badmonkey2222@badmonkey22224 жыл бұрын
    • @@badmonkey2222 Don’t be silly.

      @thethirdman225@thethirdman2253 жыл бұрын
    • There was no wonder weapon which won the war. It was a combination of different approaches, some of which worked better than others, and the sacrifices made by people who never wanted to fight. some of the comparisons claiming "best" or "rubbish" are rather childish and pointless, and usually made by ones who were not alive at the time.

      @petegarnett7731@petegarnett7731 Жыл бұрын
  • Just amazing and stupid that almost everyone in these old videos was all dressed up and wearing a tie, no matter what the work was. Thank God we have gotten over the idiocy of this practice. Quite a story and quite a fine plane.

    @jameskeyes1131@jameskeyes1131 Жыл бұрын
  • Got to be one of the coolest planes ever made. It ran rings around the Germans - is there anything it couldn't do!

    @Jonothethird@Jonothethird10 жыл бұрын
    • Swim ?

      @TheSkipjack95@TheSkipjack9510 жыл бұрын
    • No, apparently it could do that too!

      @Jonothethird@Jonothethird10 жыл бұрын
    • ***** Well the Spitfire was completely outclassed at the end of the war, by late american planes and the Typhoon and Tempest. Running joke amongst tempest pilots was that the landing speed of a tempest is the cruising speed of a Spit.

      @TheSkipjack95@TheSkipjack959 жыл бұрын
    • ***** The Spitfire had to go to the larger Griffon engine to get 1 mph faster than the Merlin Mustang, and the Mustang had twice the range of the Spitfire...The Mustang could do what the Spitfire could do ALL DAY LONG while the Spit fire could not do at all what the mustang could do...fly to Berlin destroy the Luftwaffe and return....

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21429 жыл бұрын
    • Why?? when they had photo recon Mustangs??

      @wilburfinnigan2142@wilburfinnigan21429 жыл бұрын
KZhead