China's Brand New Aircraft Carrier vs USS Gerald R. Ford Supercarrier - Who Would Win?
00:00 China's Brand New Aircraft Carrier vs USS Gerald R. Ford Supercarrier - Who Would Win?
14:09 Real Reason Why China Wants To Expand
26:17 China's World War 3 Plan
39:47 China Fired Laser at a US Aircraft, Why?
51:01 How China Plan's on Taking Over the World
01:10:15 What if China Attacked Russia
01:24:09 China vs United States - Who Will Win WW3? || Military Army Comparison
01:46:54 How US Will Respond if China Invades Taiwan
01:59:45 China's Plan to Take Over the World
02:19:27 China Finds Something Weird on Dark Side of the Moon
02:30:05 Can China Defend From a US Invasion?
02:41:16 India vs China - Who Would Win? Army/Military Comparison
02:55:01 China vs United States (USA) - Who Would Win? 2020 Military / Army Comparison
03:07:39 Why War With China Will Get You Drafted
03:16:58 Why China Wants Russia To LOSE Ukraine War
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO THE INFOGRAPHICS SHOW ► kzhead.info...
🔖 MY SOCIAL PAGES
TikTok ► / theinfographicsshow
Discord ► / discord
Facebook ► / theinfographicsshow
Twitter ► / theinfoshow
💭 Find more interesting stuff on:
www.theinfographicsshow.com
📝 SOURCES:
All videos are based on publicly available information unless otherwise noted.
Our Secret Weapon for growing on KZhead ➼ vidiq.com/theinfoshow/
It’s like you know people fall asleep listening to these
I've fallen asleep to Infographics every night for like 2 years now. They're perfect as they are interesting and entertaining enough to watch two or three as I settle down and get comfortable in bed, and then when I'm drifting off to sleep I turn the volume down a touch and turn over to sleep.
@@jakepage7003 Whatever you do, friends, don't fall asleep to a similar military oriented channel, LazerPig.. You'll be... different. Very very different.
Really easy to listen to his voice all night. This man has a gift
I do lol
Check out drachinifel (historical naval ships and battles)
Best KZhead channel to sleep to thank you keep making 3hr+ videos
USA Military's true greatest strength is the complex and efficient logistical capabilities that allow USA to project power far away from home; operational and communication capabilities are unmatched.
yes so strong ..not winning wars in 70 years Afghanistan 20 years running away ..despite always having overwhelming air power ..carriers are sitting ducks with 90 aircraft onboard against hypersonic missiles ...always under estimating ...that's why can't really win wars ..
My statement was talking about their capabilities. True those wars we didn't have a favorable outcome but we've won many wars and small conflicts throughout those 70 years.
Those loses were political. Could have vaporized the places if unleashed. The U.S is a world police force. Not a conquerer @@patrolmanracv
@@patrolmanracv no winning of war then why all country including China afraid to usa 🤣🤣
@@patrolmanracvIt was America’s politicians that lost those conflicts, not her military.
I love America. Thanks America for being American. ❤
Video is 3 hrs long because that is how long the Chinese carrier will last in a actual fight
You win at the Internet to be sure. Well said.
@@UBEREEMSUPREME And yet another winner! Seriously that nearly made me evacuate Newcastle through my nose. And I take my Newcastle brown VERY seriously.
Coral reefs in hours. Yep.
The Chinese carrier probably wouldn't last that long. Direct hits in certain areas would cause extremely destructive explosions. About 30 minutes to an hour survivability at best in reality .
Vietnam and Taliban were the strongest
The only way to actually sink a US Supercarrier is with either Godzilla or the Decepticons
No.
Yes.
Or nukes.
Fake news. Destructicons or class 5 kaiju or Cloverfield
Or those hypersonic missiles China has... I'm not sure carriers are relevant in a conflict with China
US Carriers arent unsinkable nothing is, but America really doesnt like when people mess with our toys. If a country was to attack a carrier and even badly damage it, i imagine the response would be quite... "proportional"
The response would be an over-match. They won't have a navy.
Awesome, "proportional". What the Fat Electrician said about the US sinking half of Iran's navy.
Quack bang!!
Proportion response the USA would ICE them in no time giving even the trolls would be pink baloney mist trying to run from their laptops!
Yep USA carriers can sink but sinking one will cause devastating effect instantaneous it never travel alone … don’t make a mockery of CCP naval Chinese carrier is a waste to taxpayers money and you all know 😂😂😂😂😂don’t come here talking about that we all know about it .. anything made in China never last no time
You're sleeping and wake up wondering "why do I want an aircraft carrier and a beer"🤯
I'm really digging these long infographic videos
You can't have the worlds largest defense budget without a bad guy to fight.
And if there isn’t one, you can always fund one and wait 20 years. But as an engineer for a defense contractor, I do thank these bad guys for their disservice.
China has a LOT of “enemies” (and yes, CHINA’S defense budget is far bigger than the U.S,)
A nation can have the highest defense budget in the world, as long as there are many small bad guys. Recently, China’s navy received and ignored multiple SOS distress calls in the Middle East, to terrorists & pirates respectively, violating international laws of the seas. China demonstrated China is impotent & incapable of acting by like a good international actor against pirates & terrorists. China’s inability to answer international SOS calls demonstrates someone has to be able to respond to terrorism & pirates, and that means the US is thanked by hundreds of nations around the world for having large military budget.
@@DavidHalko Go go world police! Meanwhile the US is the most indebted entity in world history. That's $32 trillion and counting that will never be repaid.
😅 let's be real, America would still spend that money on defense like Rome would 😂 Having someone in second keeps us on our toes, and keeps us honest.
I love these videos they are so entertaining to watch
Ford carrier has a better sortie rate. Even the older Nimitz can launch more aircraft at the same time than China's Type 003 Fujian. While the smaller "lighting carrier" Wasp and America class assault ships can have the same sortie rate with F-35Bs.
don't forget, Chinese carrier needs two days before it can leave the port, the engines needs 48 hours to have produced enough energy! And US carrier can launch all ca.40 seconds a plane!
The idea of the Type 3 being comparable to the Ford is honestly just silly. The Type 3 is already hilariously antiquated. It runs on World War 2 technology. It's adorable. The Ford can clear an entire complement of the world's most ridiculously advanced aircraft before any Chinese vessel could get its pants on.
@@linksbetweendrinks7032 Ok, not WW2...but close, the best comparison should IMHO be the Forestals (or maybe - but that's stretching it - the Kitty-Hawks!), so conventionally powered carriers built after WW2 and retired in the early 2000s (Kitty-Hawk being the last in 2009!)
@@linksbetweendrinks7032 Oh? The Ford has a EMALS problem with it reached about 15% of design predictions before it crapped out. Media reports that the US Navy says it will be 2025 before it gets fixed. Hmm? "Aboard the USS Ford, the electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) continues to disappoint. On average, the electromagnetic catapult fails every 614 cycles-a measly fifteen percent of the Navy's target of 4,166 aircraft launches, or “mean cycles between operational mission failures (MCBOMF)”.Jan 25, 2023 (Forbes) BTW, the blast shields also appear to be defective. Deck crew are toast.
@@linksbetweendrinks7032Type 3's catapult system is second to none, FYI
I didn't know they sailed backwards........great vidz buddy keep up the work.
Buddy? Yeah, only the narrator makes these...
Lol They forgot to mention that they are inverted vessels from the TeneT Universe 👍🏾
I'm thinking the USN will use the 003's for target practice. I'm not really seeing the 003's as much of a threat.
Love the long vids. Keeping my Bluetooth in all day at work...
Everybody knows how to fight until they get punched in the face
Mike Tyson.....
USNS Concord - the fueler the Kitty Hawk was tied to mostly during UNREPs while we were... adjusting the topography of Iraq and Afghanistan. Thanks for the gas! But a problem with your statement about these support vessels, and how nuke carriers don't need them: There _IS_ an Air Wing aboard, and they run on JP5.
And 5000 very hungry people.
They still need food and other supplies as well
Love these Hollywood Top Gun commercials. Meanwhile the US carrier fleet has retreated to the second island chain 😂😂😂
I'm quite sure China has watched thousands of hours of carrier ops of the US and the UK and a few others. It is an art. It takes people who love what they do. From the deck crew and air marshal to the Ouija board to the mini boss then to the air boss. It is a concert. The bare minimum is launching an aircraft every 30 seconds ! Trapping an aircraft every 45 seconds ! Turn around time 10 minutes ! We do it faster and better than that. The USN carrier and strike group. I do believe China has had a lot of time watching with patience learning with patients. China will be no joke, that's for sure. They're only hope would be to take out our carriers. That goes both ways ! Just because the limitations of the Accord limits the amount of carriers don't think for one second the US does not have 3 fold in reserve. I'm not a warmonger. I don't want war. I don't believe Ming wants it either. They cannot even claim Taiwan has China territory just saying so doesn't make it so. Nor does saying the ocean belongs to China. That was the silliest thing I ever heard. We knew that they were dredging and building islands. The natural Islands of volcanoes were first come first served. Whoever claimed it named it. China has a lot of money and if their doctrine in defense and offense was of Japan in world war II. There will be a battle. I truly believe they're waiting for the right moment when they believe that we are thinned out between Ukraine and Israel. But they know without doubt we have more to bring to the fight. Nobody wants war. I surely don't. But those are the facts. God bless you all 🕊️🕊️🕊️
agree, but at the moment it is more probable that China is collapsing from the inside as that it will collapse bcs of war!
real asf
Inforgraphics thank you
This is a good installment. Well done.
Awesome content!
Perfect on the spot in a short video. Listening on my way to work on the other side of the country
Great graphics
How many iterations of this video have you guys made? It’s at least a dozen in the last year
Can you please tell me where you create these video's? wich site or app? you would help me loads! If you got a affiliate link I can use?
Everybody wants a ten minute quick vid not a three hour lullaby
The US military, without a doubt. Has the biggest toy box.
Which today is probably the most important part in a war, as well as supply, which they're also the best at
Well, that depends. Russia has the biggest toy box in numbers...it is just all very antiquated equipment that hasn't had any maintenance. The only reason they haven't been thrown out of Ukraine is due to this. They are absolute hoarders and have HUGE stockpiles all over. The US has the biggest toy box in currently useful, updated, and maintained equipment with a vast array of usefulness.
IMO, the American people don't even really know everything our military has and what is really capable of.
US navy got the most expensive stuff in this planet, by sailing all of them in the ocean can make US bankrupt. China should do nothing, stay calm and watch till the game is over.
idk what it is but i can only fall asleep when something I'm interested in listening to is on, and his voice just makes it that much easier
I listen to these right when I lay down to nap. Puts me right to sleep.
Nuclear Powered or not, does not mean they don't need a dedicated oiler, where do you think the jet fuel comes from and the food to feed 1000's of personal...
Magic. Anyway, better question is where does he think the Uranium comes from? We don't mine much of it anymore and we're not exactly liked on the world stage.
@@Shyhalu I know huh? Those reactors constantly need uranium shoveled in them to keep working. When the uranium onboard gets low or runs out the carrier will have to hook up to a uranium tanker ship or find a port has uranium refueling facilities. 🙄
@@martinwarford1389 You understand what a spent fuel rod is, right? Engine maintenance.....etc? Or do you also think Nuclear plants just magically produce power forever?
@@Shyhalu @Shyhalu Yeah I understand. I also understand that deployed carriers aren't at risk of their rods being spent, they don't send them out with "the needle on the E". They plan years ahead for the refueling process and so if one was even headed in to be refueld/overhauled the process could be delayed if unexpected world events warranted it. No country is gonna catch a US carrier slipping, at sea afloat listless and vulnerable because lack of nuclear fuel for propulsion or operation of defensive and offensive weapons. As for the availability of uranium, I'm also sure they've planned ahead to have enough stockpiled for what is needed at least in the short term. They're not waiting for the carriers or subs to be a few weeks away from returning to port and then deciding to go out to Walmart and buy some. And two of the biggest uranium producers Australia and Canada are tight allies with us. They don't have as much as Kazakhstan but they have it.
Being conventionally powered I have my doubts at how well the Electronic catapults on the type 3 will work. Will they be able to power all ship systems at full power including propulsion, radars, weapons, electronic warfare, ect. While launching one let alone two or three planes at a time? I seriously have my doubts.
The US has running carriers down to a science. Im sure accidents happen that we never here about. But those folks that run things on a carrier do a super job
For every success there could be 100 failures. Nobody talks about that but it's a reality... and the Chinese think they can surpass the US in the near future. The BEST scientist and engineers live and work in the US. They come from China Russia, India, Taiwan and other countries all around the world. Why? Because it's a free country and it pays better... waaaay better... the best only run with the best. Chengdu or Sukhoi thinks they can beat Lockheed? 🤣🤣🤣🤣 That's only one example.
Type 003 is good but still nowhere near US super carriers (Ford, Nimitz). Doesn’t have a nuclear reactor. Much smaller number of aircraft onboard: US up to 90 per super carrier, Type 003 over 40.
Nuclear reactor isn't absolutely necessary as long as range is enough and it can power all its needs. As for number of aircraft, it it cause China uses j15 which is a heavy (large) fighter. When the j31/35 is ready, they will fit a lot more on the carrier cause it is much smaller.
@@k.k.c8670the reason a nuclear plant is needed Is to reduce supply chain links in a war A Ford class carrier only needs food, troops and planes The 003 needs designated fuel tanks, to power itself. Then the same supplies you need to fight
@@donovanulrich348 sure but like I said, China's aircraft carriers are not traveling very far out from China itself (compared to US carriers). In any case, China is currently building a nuclear powered flat deck (type 004/005). At the moment, only Us and France have nuclear powered carriers
Really nice voice. That's what's its all about. David Attenborough good
Accurate too
3:58 those LRAMS are an incredibly dangerous missile!
Its a contest to see how many times they can say the same thing.
Who else listens while at work
I also wonder how subs will come into play during engaments between aircraft carriers. I know you have made videos on the Subs but just so crazy to think how close some of these scenes are from coming to real life. Dangerous time. Shoutout from Minnesota, USA. I am headed into the Coast Guard, wonder what will happen with that in the future
I bet Billy will have one of those carseats that look like a race seat
Considering how much coastline China has (and let’s not forget about their feelings about Japan), it’s honestly bizzare that they haven’t invested more into their Navy 🤷🏻♂
Woke up to this
Some of these are interesting but some help me sleep
I would love to see the Ford I bet it’s massive to see
@TheInfographicsShow i I had an idea for a video. What sized speed and composition and trajectory of an asteroid impact on the moon get it to spin then vary the factors to have it spin at different speeds also the after effect of moon debris being spit out from impact
I'd be impressed if China's carrier made it out of their territorial waters without breaking down. And unlike what they claim, thats not very far at all.
It’s funny how what ever claims China or Russia make about their weapons is always far greater than what they can actually do and the western powers claims are always way less than what they can actually do.
I just heard "China engine company". I immediately started shaking my head. I would never ride on a plane made with that.
Regardless, the US has been investing those amounts for decades and china just started being able to, and the catch up they have done in technology has come from thievery and espionage rather than through experience and hard work. Good luck on the upgrades C
There's no substitute for experience, time and lots of it, dedication, hard work and countless failures to build final success.
I agree
Are you kidding? Since when have thievery and espionage not become part of art of war? Silly rabbit.
If China was any threat, they would start helping in international arbitration and abiding international law. Or declaring war when their sovereignty was challenged. They are a paper tiger, but they can play pretend 😂 When China starts helping on the global stage, and seemingly not self interested. That's when you worry 😂
@@kenwu528If you are the first to develop a technology, then you can't steal what doesn't exist...
US Navy has Air superiority. China doesn't have the real world experience or combat experience. Plus I can bet one thing the US Navy has a huge advantage that China doesn't have, Our Naval Aviators are trained to fly by instruments which means we don't need daylight to fly. A huge advantage over anyone. We learned our lessons well thanks to the Japanese Imperial Navy teaching us this hard lesson starting with when they brought us into WWII. It was brought to the attention of the power that be that we needed to learn precision bombing and increase carrier forces 5 years before the attack on Pearl Harbor. At the time we had a formidable Navy with lots of ships, and a pretty big Army as well. That is how we fought our wars until that point, we didn't focus on the air, shoot we didn't even have an air force that was run by the Army. The powers in charge disagreed with the information presented to them, a decision that would haunt the Navy on December 7, 1941. After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Military strategy changed and the realization that we needed to learn precision bombing was proven by the Japanese. IT is one of the reasons why our pilots and Naval Aviators are trained the way that they are. I am sure in a few years the Chinese will become a formidable opponent but right now, they are still learning and building. I wouldn't say they are not a threat but they have a lot to learn.
No pause Is wild
Haha. This is like buying a carrier off of wish
How many drones fit on a carrier? They dont metion this at all, its hard to believe there's not 100s of drones on board as well.
Currently the Navy flies a drone tanker.
I swear i watched this video already
the electromagnetic catapult is "so much better" yet it still doesn't work properly xD
Are you sure about that? Where is the Ford? Where is the Fujian??? I rest my case.
Lol the fbi sponsored you
Okay, let's assume for a minute that the 003 is well equipped and meets Nimitz rather than the Ford. Now it's the oldest against the newest carrier. While the fortunes of war will on rare occasions, favor the weaker over the stronger (think Midway), that is generally not the case. The Chinese would be at a severe disadvantage against the US Navy. The Americans have over 100 years of experience of operating carriers, and have used their carriers thousands of times to attack enemies. Okay, let's do a check here and ask how many times have the Chinese used their carriers against an enemy (the wind blows across the hot desert while we wait for the Chinese guy to think of a lie to save face)? The answer, of course, is zero! Now, let's assume both carriers suffer hits and damage control is working feverishly to put out the fires. Which Navy has ships that have been built tough from actual war experience, and which Navy doesn't know how to deal with battle damage? In the end the 003 will be on the bottom, while the Nimitz will lick her wounds as her repair crews get planes quickly back into the air and clear the ocean of foolish Chinese admirals that thought they were a match for the US Navy.
For some reason you have some parts of the video with the carrier traveling in reverse. Did anyone watch the video before posting it?
They can sail backwards
@@outere24 I've been on the Nimitz and when flight ops were going on we launched aircraft moving forward facing the wind. I had a friend almost get blown off the deck because of a yellow shirt turned a F-18 on him. Luckily he landed in the netting.
This helps me to space out, relax
Inside edition please bring back the challenge man or tell us why he is no longer doing challenges please
Coudent a swedish submarine sink those? think i saw a video on that
bruh 3 HOURS WHO WILL WATCH THIS ENTIRE THING also, FIFTH YAY!
Bring it ....................
Lets also point out that Chinese jets have to launch with just a few weapins and half the fuel as they are extremely underpowered. Just like Russia
Russia can make better weapons that don't work but China can make them cheaper. 😂
Are you stuck in WW2 mentality? Why send a jet to do what guided missiles launch from a destroyer can do cheaper and better? Between super powers, Jets are toys for peace time muscle flexing. Life expectancy of any jet are a one way trip during war. The moment its weapons bay are open it will be locked by multiple guided missiles.
Lll)lllllllllll
He said that in the video lol
why are the ships in these videos always sailing backwards?
Wow,this did not show up in my feed,i.e. Notifications, an yes I have "All" selected ,hmmmmmmmmmm
That according to Einsteins unified field theory the magnetic field used to slow the aircraft before it lands can also be used as a force field no one actually knows it's true capabilities but you fire missiles at it and try to sink it you're going to find out the hardware just how deadly the Gerald Ford actually is
The new S-500 is especially effective when they remember to turn it on.
Since the Russians are always completely drunk everywhere, it becomes difficult to even find the button. Or why do you think that the flagship of the Black Sea Fleet is now at the bottom of the sea? Simply, because the Russians could not find the button for their air defence.
Russia found the air defence button but nobody was watching the radar. If they did launch SAMs they didn’t work. And after the missiles hit they couldn’t find any working fire extinguishers.
Fire extinguishers? They couldn't find any because they didn't have any because they thought they were sooo good, they didn't need any. Russia is the best enemy any country can have. All you have to do is supply your own popcorn.... Duhh... I wonder why Russian arms sales is on the down side? @@davidelliott5843
Good Chat AI generated script make a soft muisc helps calm military buffs
I helped build that boat. Can't wait to see how she'll perform in battle.
Yes we do
You used to post daily about Ukraine but not one post about what’s happening in the ME…. Anybody know what’s up with that?
Imagine seeing a missile coming your way and on it a sticker that says "Made In China" 😅
China can't even build an apartment block or a road without it falling apart in a week. I'm sure their supercarriers are great!
are you sure about that?
I like to watch these when I'm on transcontental flights.
Match? yeah, right. The Gerald Ford will simply pummel the Fujian into submission with its insane endurance.
Wait until HHI unleashes the Enterprise...
With the invention of youtube, the enemy is only half a step behind.
I'm surprised neither carrier uses eloctromag launch rather than more complicated and limiting steam.. I would think with electro launch and catch, they could launch even 747 off the deck of the carrier was wide enough for its exceedingly long wings, which makes me wonder why they don't cut the wings in half and double them up would still equal same surface area with shorter wing span
This is like asking me if i got brand new golf clubs, could I beat a PGA Tour player.
I'm old school navy, off the Midway we used to launch 3 aircraft per 5 mins.... That's with only 2 cats.
The water graphics always makes it look like things are going backwards, what is up with that?
ain’t no way infographics show just reuploaded 💀💀💀💀
They sure did.
A number of the animations have the ships sailing backwards.
Why do you constantly show the U.S. ships sailing backwards?
Of course! What would a new infographic be w o @ least 1 “33” somewhere…. Any1 else notice that favorite # featured more than any other?
The Gerald Ford can launch planes with the slingshot and slow them down with a magnetic field you do realize that according to Einstein's unified field theory this could also be used as a force field to protect the entire Gerald Ford not to mention the laser weapons it's carrying
The Ford uses arresting gear. It's a new system, but built off an existing one.
Correct.
Is this a joke?
drones carrier subs are more cost effective than aircraft carriers which are just missiles magnets.
F-XX is exactly what the name implies. A fighter for the 20th century, most specifically WW2 and Cold War to an extend. Why not put out the Vulcan too and instead put 8 M2 browning, 4 in each wing into it and have to deal with convergence again.
Stop with all the compliation re-hashes. If you are too tired to make content for your channel, its fine, just take a break
You say a us carrier doesn’t need a dedicated oiler however the aircraft’s still need fuel so they always have a oiler around both for fuel and food supplies
A better comparison would be the older conventional carriers the US operated like the Kitty-Hawks or even the Forestals!
Hey China do you really want to find out the hard way that Tesla's death ray is now mobile not to mention
I like how a lot of these videos down play how badly USA would dominate. Never let the enemy know your real power.
Anyone else see that carrier traveling backwards in the water while launching planes? 1:15
The issue is we don’t send enough destroyers with an Aircraft Carrier battle group! They will get overwhelmed if China decides to really try to damage an entire group. The Navy needs to increase the number of destroyers sent with every battle group. There will be more defensive missiles and radars working together.
Why showing boats going backwards?
China is like the kid in class who copies your work in a test.
It would be epic if they made a submersible aircraft carrier.
Between the wars the Royal had a submarine that carried an aircraft. You don't need to be a clairvoyant to know how that ended, someone left the hanger door open and it sank.
We just keep moving the goal line
You left out the UK as an Indian ally. India is a member of the British Commonwealth, it is unlikely that Britain wouldn't be first before France to fight on India's side.