KZhead
Ғылым және технология

Large Scale Rubik's Cube Simulation - Solving 32768 Layers

ShellPuppy
2019 ж. 18 Шіл.
4 859 236 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

This record is now obsolete! A new record has been set • Huge Rubik's cube solv...
6,442,450,944 tiles
2706.16 hours
Each face is exactly 2^30 tiles, equivalent to a 1 gigapixel image. Here is a link to a full size (2x zoomed) image of the front face. (easyzoom.com/image/146053/alb...)
The grid size in the scales animation is 1m for the small squares and 10m for the large. The cube is 622m in each dimension (based a 3x3 cube being 57mm)
The solver is a single threaded 64 bit application written in c++. The source code has been posted to GitHub (github.com/ShellPuppy/RCube). If anyone is interested in a challenge, the application is capable of solving up to a 65,536 layered cube but I predict it will take around 2 years to complete and require just over 24gb of ram. The app is capable of saving its state every few hours in case a reboot is necessary. I'm fairly certain it's not possible to make this app multi-threaded since there is no reasonable way to break the problem into sub problems that can be distributed; imagine 2 people trying to solve a cube at the same time.
The algorithm I used is explained in more detail the GitHub readme. In short, it solves centers then corners then edges and uses a very efficient commutator that can move many tiles at once. The edges and corners are brute force solved (there is a lot of room for improvement there).
I ran this simulation on an 8700k @ 5ghz and it took a total of 2706.16 hours to complete and generated over 500gb of image data. I set it to export a set of images for each face about every 150,000 moves. Unfortunately there aren't enough pixels in a 4k video to show every tile on the cube so I had the app export 4-megapixel images for each face and frame of the animation (each face actually contains exactly 1 gigapixel). Those 6 image sequences were used to texture a cube for the final render. In addition the app exports some statistics to a log file which was used to generate the stats in the final video.
The zoom-out sequence nearly broke my machine. I generated 3 full size images (front, top, and right) and used it to texture a 3d cube then moved the camera extremely close. I used an s-curve function (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sigmoid...) for the motion of the camera.
Note: rotations of 2 were counted as single move in the stats.

Пікірлер

  • no one: actually no one: cuber: LeTS TeSt CorNEr CuT giant cube: my time as come

    @luizguipro4855@luizguipro48554 жыл бұрын

    • Bro, i know its a joke but we cubers see if it cornercuts well for preformance.

      @windproductions343@windproductions3434 жыл бұрын

    • @@windproductions343 but we never test cornercutting on giant cubes

      @yuxinlittlemagic@yuxinlittlemagic4 жыл бұрын

    • If we tested corner-cutting on big cubes, the world would be knee-deep in cube parts.

      @BunnyBoing@BunnyBoing4 жыл бұрын

    • @@BunnyBoing *thigh deep in cube parts

      @yuxinlittlemagic@yuxinlittlemagic4 жыл бұрын

    • Underrated

      @edan.mac1@edan.mac14 жыл бұрын

  • Me: It’s gonna look so cool when it’s fully scrambled, it’s gonna be like a weird rainbow! Cube: *b e i g e*

    @theemreunal@theemreunal4 жыл бұрын

    • Yeah unfortunately the average of all the cube colors is kind of that boring orange.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@shellpuppy tbh it's kind of cool to realise that at that scale randomness becomes... order.

      @okboing@okboing4 жыл бұрын

    • So F U N N Y

      @TotallyTaliton@TotallyTaliton3 жыл бұрын

    • s

      @HaLe-dz8ro@HaLe-dz8ro3 жыл бұрын

    • s

      @jaysondavis9693@jaysondavis96933 жыл бұрын

  • I adore the fact that there are still only eight corner pieces.

    @felixrowan3740@felixrowan3740 Жыл бұрын

    • IPAUPUCUSOYUGYPIVIYVOSHWVYEGSGSOYSOYVOYVSOYVOUVOSDVUSVHDVUAVUVPUVOUPDVJPVPWCPJBD

      @29_pat@29_pat Жыл бұрын

    • Same

      @GalaxyTabS8Ultra@GalaxyTabS8Ultra Жыл бұрын

    • more than 8 would technically become a megaminx and alike

      @retruecano@retruecano Жыл бұрын

    • @@retruecano yes

      @purevessel123@purevessel123 Жыл бұрын

    • Yep, that is how a cube works

      @dogsareawesome9197@dogsareawesome9197 Жыл бұрын

  • I like how the centers took 2700 hours and the edges took like 15 minutes.

    @dyray732@dyray732 Жыл бұрын

    • I mean centers have more pieces

      @kittyn5222@kittyn5222 Жыл бұрын

    • @@kittyn5222 but edges would not take that long for that big of a piece

      @Qwaziop@Qwaziop Жыл бұрын

    • The centers are squares and not lines, which means they grow faster and faster than the edges as the number of layers increases, which means the edge portion of the solve becomes a smaller and smaller part of the process.

      @Chrnan6710@Chrnan671011 ай бұрын

    • 1:22 it took 1 day to merge

      @fireinthehole9474@fireinthehole947410 ай бұрын

    • But the cube is basically all center

      @user-jd1mn3ur2j@user-jd1mn3ur2j7 ай бұрын

  • 15:28: looks like a 1x1 to me

    @anthonylabarbera3656@anthonylabarbera36564 жыл бұрын

    • i agree

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • i agree too

      @lliililIllIllIiilIlliiliI@lliililIllIllIiilIlliiliI4 жыл бұрын

    • Tony. pianoman same

      @stonecreekstables1@stonecreekstables14 жыл бұрын

    • xD yes

      @s_rd_ne395@s_rd_ne3954 жыл бұрын

    • Ikr

      @NStripleseven@NStripleseven4 жыл бұрын

  • ah a Banana, an absolute unit of measurement!

    @manowartank8784@manowartank87844 жыл бұрын

    • I wanted to use the international meme standard of measurement.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • It works better for scale

      @AngelReyes-td6kl@AngelReyes-td6kl4 жыл бұрын

    • You should have used a person.

      @BunnyBoing@BunnyBoing4 жыл бұрын

    • well that was the best measurement ever a banana is amazing XD

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • Dashing the Cube ur ruining the joke go away

      @nilslewin983@nilslewin9834 жыл бұрын

  • This is an even numbered cube, imagine the work it would take to put this together, even a 32769 would take a shorter amount of time to construct

    @lucassimpson2934@lucassimpson2934 Жыл бұрын

    • 32768*

      @traceyyang7927@traceyyang792711 ай бұрын

    • The piece count difference is only 393172, but the insides would be shorter if the core was like the T W O B Y T W O .

      @bobczech7774@bobczech777411 ай бұрын

  • 0:46 bruh, imagine looking out of your window, after moving out for like 3 months, *and then seeing a 32768 x 32768 rubix cube*

    @migolas8222@migolas82224 жыл бұрын

    • Rubik’s*

      @tyronium2@tyronium23 жыл бұрын

    • @@tyronium2 rubix also makes sense

      @woodyfireylover9996@woodyfireylover99963 жыл бұрын

    • @@woodyfireylover9996 no, the correct spelling is Rubik’s cus the guy who invented it was erno rubik and it’s his cube

      @tyronium2@tyronium23 жыл бұрын

    • Whatever, a 21x21 can fit on a desk and is like the size of a GameCube or something, and the pieces get smaller as the cube gets bigger (unless it’s the outer layers), so this would be like the size of a big fence probably

      @E46SedanGaming@E46SedanGaming2 жыл бұрын

  • So if each person in the world did one move it would be finished

    @rod1714@rod17144 жыл бұрын

    • No, it would be moved

      @brimster-valorantaggressiv3419@brimster-valorantaggressiv34194 жыл бұрын

    • One correct move, because if they all did the wrong moves, then the cube will not be solved.

      @davidyin57@davidyin574 жыл бұрын

    • Rod barely

      @theperfecteraser5988@theperfecteraser59884 жыл бұрын

    • Why did u have to spoil it

      @SeffDaMeff@SeffDaMeff4 жыл бұрын

    • Noob

      @maviboncuk1062@maviboncuk10624 жыл бұрын

  • My concept of hell is that you're stuck with one of these and you need to solve it to go to heaven

    @Harmonity@Harmonity4 жыл бұрын

    • :(

      @bjamiork@bjamiork4 жыл бұрын

    • There is no Heaven, only Rubik's.

      @cmomofilm@cmomofilm4 жыл бұрын

    • cmomofilm there is

      @Amina-rq8wr@Amina-rq8wr4 жыл бұрын

    • @@Amina-rq8wr lol

      @cmomofilm@cmomofilm4 жыл бұрын

    • I'm lucky if I get 3x3x3

      @shawnangelolee1238@shawnangelolee12384 жыл бұрын

  • By the way, cubes above 6x6 require the outer layer to be larger, so the 32k cube would have outer layers the size of the cube itself here

    @th1v5@th1v52 жыл бұрын

    • lol true

      @daniellathecat856@daniellathecat8562 жыл бұрын

    • The 6x6 actually needs it too

      @E46SedanGaming@E46SedanGaming2 жыл бұрын

    • @@E46SedanGaming it doesn’t need it, it’s just way better with it so most 6x6s have that

      @thesmasher.@thesmasher. Жыл бұрын

    • @@asengamer-terryandprimo3105 no it doesn’t need it, it’s just the corner pieces would have to be super super thin and could fall of or break easily and the edges would be fine

      @thesmasher.@thesmasher. Жыл бұрын

    • @@asengamer-terryandprimo3105 I mean the handle holding the corner pieces in the cube, Jperm made a vid about that but I forgot what it’s called

      @thesmasher.@thesmasher. Жыл бұрын

  • Imagine this popping. Could it cause floods?

    @joshuahung5940@joshuahung59404 жыл бұрын

    • yes

      @Idk73738@Idk7373810 ай бұрын

    • Yes

      @georgeoneal8148@georgeoneal81489 ай бұрын

    • I bet you at least one person would think it was part of the non-existent "gay agenda" considering the rainbow that'd wash over them

      @PastelShark123@PastelShark1238 ай бұрын

    • Yes

      @denzzz8918@denzzz89188 ай бұрын

    • Yes

      @yan_ge@yan_geАй бұрын

  • Non cuber: i can solve that in 1 second

    @TanMinh-bl8ci@TanMinh-bl8ci4 жыл бұрын

    • Tan Minh I’ll peel the stickers off

      @alb6404@alb64044 жыл бұрын

    • @Sartfla might take even longer

      @conantur9897@conantur98974 жыл бұрын

    • Pucky 2011 Actually, this comment was made a week before his.

      @thedudethatneveruploads2617@thedudethatneveruploads26174 жыл бұрын

    • 이준영 it’s 32768 x 32768 x 6 stickers and the cube is almost as tall as the empire state building

      @conantur9897@conantur98974 жыл бұрын

    • @@PuckyDoesStuff r/woooosh

      @V0W4N@V0W4N4 жыл бұрын

  • 1:00 it looked like a warp effect

    @hellogame1304@hellogame13044 жыл бұрын

    • If you subscribe to me I will to you

      @TheCodeToCool@TheCodeToCool4 жыл бұрын

    • It does

      @roburrito.@roburrito.3 жыл бұрын

    • Yeah

      @1millionsubscriberschallen336@1millionsubscriberschallen3363 жыл бұрын

    • Yes

      @nikolas32447@nikolas324472 жыл бұрын

    • Or like it popped and it is falling in a hole

      @mehmetkiremitci752@mehmetkiremitci7522 жыл бұрын

  • The problem with this is that it would have to borrow the mechanism of a 32769x32769 and the corners would be absolutely massive

    @E46SedanGaming@E46SedanGaming2 жыл бұрын

    • at some point, it would be just to hold a record, but solving it would have been not only pointless, but also extremely long. the biggest *interesting* solving is, to me, the tier 7, or at most the tier 9, since all cubes above work the same, only having more tiles, and being more and more tricky to build and sensitive to pops.

      @super.heraut.officiel@super.heraut.officiel Жыл бұрын

    • Bro, you know theres like 7 billion moves you need to make too...

      @gmdFrame@gmdFrame7 ай бұрын

    • so massive you can see them

      @jessemaycaramonte2004@jessemaycaramonte20044 ай бұрын

  • Man, this looks so dope.

    @RGC_animation@RGC_animation2 жыл бұрын

  • No one: KZhead Algorithn: HERE WATCH THIS COMPUTER SOLVE A GIANT RUBIKS CUBE PLEASE

    @Eltzx@Eltzx4 жыл бұрын

  • No one: Non cube:EZ Cube:what method was the computer using:)

    @amgiahao8406@amgiahao84064 жыл бұрын

  • The camera going out of the Rubik's Cube made me hypnotized.

    @paperactioncut@paperactioncut3 жыл бұрын

  • when the colors blend, it looks like a sand block in 1x1 texturepack 1:08

    @roguestxrrr@roguestxrrr3 жыл бұрын

    • Xd

      @sitsia3808@sitsia38082 жыл бұрын

    • 11:07

      @phrimphrao54@phrimphrao54 Жыл бұрын

  • “Is that a 10x10?”

    @Reneryx@Reneryx4 жыл бұрын

    • yes

      @AQ206istaken@AQ206istaken4 жыл бұрын

    • Lmao

      @thebacongodfather777@thebacongodfather7774 жыл бұрын

    • "OH MY! ITS AN 100 CUBE!!"

      @johark@johark4 жыл бұрын

    • No it's the 10 cube

      @lolhi2821@lolhi28214 жыл бұрын

    • wot

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

  • solving the edges compared to the centers lol

    @matthewl6627@matthewl66274 жыл бұрын

    • You don't even get to see the "solve like a 3x3" part bc it was way too fast

      @nanamacapagal8342@nanamacapagal83424 жыл бұрын

    • @@nanamacapagal8342 i was angry 'bout that :v

      @sienamarra9114@sienamarra91144 жыл бұрын

    • Setsuna Kujo Stfu filthy weeb

      @imnotfuckingusingthisaccou2574@imnotfuckingusingthisaccou25744 жыл бұрын

    • I was expecting it to slow down and was excited for parody

      @anagramofevil8824@anagramofevil88244 жыл бұрын

    • @@imnotfuckingusingthisaccou2574 Actually everybody here is complaining about it so why r u here???

      @phase0400@phase04003 жыл бұрын

  • If every people in the world does a TRUE move it solves at that point!

    @babuu2009@babuu20093 жыл бұрын

  • Everyone:that1x1 is EASY Shellpuppy:no that's a 32768x32768. Me:Ok?

    @schmueltovidumalag6789@schmueltovidumalag67898 ай бұрын

  • 10 year old kid:”I can do that in 10 seconds”

    @Bixnic@Bixnic4 жыл бұрын

    • lol

      @ImmortalPurple@ImmortalPurple4 жыл бұрын

    • bruh how it`s impossible

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • impossible ._.

      @kauinoej@kauinoej4 жыл бұрын

    • I’m 10,but I can’t solve just 3x3x3 cube

      @earthandstar3392@earthandstar33924 жыл бұрын

    • Maran Modas Recife & São Paulo he must be very sure the title is very convincing

      @jackbrowne8527@jackbrowne85273 жыл бұрын

  • Wow... not a reverse scramble. Impressive!

    @12ervan@12ervan4 жыл бұрын

    • yea. no reverse scramble is awesome.

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • ervanz scream

      @K10_Productions@K10_Productions4 жыл бұрын

    • @@K10_Productions yeah same scream

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • If you subscribe to me I will to you

      @TheCodeToCool@TheCodeToCool4 жыл бұрын

    • Just scream bro

      @zaydenross8766@zaydenross87663 жыл бұрын

  • Thanks for the tutorial bro! Now i will try to solve the legendary 1x1

    @ianperich7299@ianperich72993 жыл бұрын

    • 10 years later* Comes back to this video

      @AidMc-sj3vw@AidMc-sj3vw2 жыл бұрын

  • Cube: **pops** Everybody: ... *_NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO_* (Inspiration from Nolan Stott)

    @mailingcat@mailingcat4 жыл бұрын

  • Looks like a one by one to me when it's solved

    @andrewmeng2081@andrewmeng20814 жыл бұрын

    • I like how it looks like a pure orange color when scrambled. I noticed that after the cube got bigger than about 1000x1000 it just all blended together.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • No it looks like a 2x2

      @timmyteeej3986@timmyteeej39864 жыл бұрын

    • It is

      @gio1185@gio11854 жыл бұрын

    • Ikr

      @cutiestcutcat514@cutiestcutcat5144 жыл бұрын

    • 1x1x1

      @thebacongodfather777@thebacongodfather7774 жыл бұрын

  • According to maths , On the 32768 Layer cube , there would be more combinations than all of the stars in the known universe duplicated by 81 trevigintillion

    @Groove_Nation@Groove_Nation4 жыл бұрын

    • Trevigintillion is 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 right?

      @Reneryx@Reneryx4 жыл бұрын

    • A trevigintillion is 10^72. To give you a sense of how huge this is, the universe is estimated to have about 10^80 atoms. A trevigintillion is only 100 million times smaller, or 8 orders of magnitude less.

      @YYHoe@YYHoe4 жыл бұрын

    • drain oh god

      @relylolz@relylolz4 жыл бұрын

    • 10^80 x 81^72

      @idotn8752@idotn87524 жыл бұрын

    • its impossible to make a 32768 by 32768 cube bc there would be too many moving parts

      @adyroger11@adyroger114 жыл бұрын

  • it's a sand block

    @wormah6944@wormah6944 Жыл бұрын

  • omg this is how Rubix cubers spend lockdown

    @donnawilliams3158@donnawilliams31583 жыл бұрын

  • Imagine if this was invented just before a nuclear war........ USA :drop the biggest cube ever.

    @joshwine6738@joshwine67384 жыл бұрын

  • I was curious about the edges and 3x3 parts of the solve. they were like 5 frames in the end

    @tovawr@tovawr4 жыл бұрын

    • Each frame of the animation was about 150,000 moves.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • Percentage of solve: 0.00000000261885732%

      @bobczech7774@bobczech777411 ай бұрын

  • can we just appreciate the fact that it took 200MIL less moves that the current world population?

    @prettyblueeyesinny@prettyblueeyesinny3 жыл бұрын

  • What it actually is: a skyscraper-sized rubik's cube being solved What it looks like: a weird static cube filling up with glitchy loading animations

    @sethbailey2166@sethbailey21664 жыл бұрын

  • That actually looks cool how the green side is just appearing

    @garfeltrealtbh@garfeltrealtbh4 жыл бұрын

    • It’s not the green side, it’s an effect. It happens because all the reds on that side moves out and all left colors average makes it look like a pastel green

      @asddsaasdfg2846@asddsaasdfg2846 Жыл бұрын

    • Ryvci

      @manjunewar3305@manjunewar3305 Жыл бұрын

    • @@asddsaasdfg2846 Rhj ,-!!&))₹₹₹₹#₹₹₹₹₹₹__₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹₹

      @manjunewar3305@manjunewar3305 Жыл бұрын

    • Jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjkjjjjjkjjjjjjjjjjjk

      @manjunewar3305@manjunewar3305 Жыл бұрын

    • @@asddsaasdfg2846 NERD EMOJI

      @5cherrypies@5cherrypies Жыл бұрын

  • Now this is actually solving. Not reversing the scramble.

    @Righteous.1.@Righteous.1.4 жыл бұрын

    • But it's just a computer finding the solution. There is no way that a human has enough lifetime to solve this.

      @hypercubemaster2729@hypercubemaster27294 ай бұрын

  • So solving a Rubik’s cube the size of a skyscraper Wow That takes almost 1275 days

    @JustAPersonWhoComments@JustAPersonWhoComments2 жыл бұрын

  • When did you solve edges and corners?

    @juzzzosekki5257@juzzzosekki5257 Жыл бұрын

  • This is How cubers spend their quarantine...

    @aadi2808@aadi28084 жыл бұрын

  • Wow! This is took longer than a win 10 update!

    @samunemeth@samunemeth4 жыл бұрын

    • I didn't know they were even comperable length to thousands of hours #MacForEver

      @einorauhala1749@einorauhala17494 жыл бұрын

    • Somehow

      @Reneryx@Reneryx4 жыл бұрын

    • i agree

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • GD Flash yeah I have a Windows 10 and this takes much longer

      @sarimolsa2653@sarimolsa26534 жыл бұрын

    • @@Reneryx you play GD, so you know how kong 2.2 is taking?😂

      @fjaps@fjaps4 жыл бұрын

  • Yes, I did sit here for 15 minutes to watch 32768 layers of a rubix cube be sved

    @theoneandonly_duck@theoneandonly_duck11 ай бұрын

  • My sis while i’m seeing this video: My sis:Is he printing?

    @techyluqz9537@techyluqz95372 жыл бұрын

  • Just imagine the ai making a mistake that will reset it's progress.

    @jordanjacobii9764@jordanjacobii97644 жыл бұрын

    • I really worried about what would happen if even one bit of memory got out of place during the solve it would have left parts of it unsolved or scrambled. However, I planned for crashes and had it save every hour so at worst it would lose 1 hour of work.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@shellpuppy Very interesting! As I understand it, you first calculated the solution (a sequence of steps), and then generated the video separately?

      @sovaz1997@sovaz19974 жыл бұрын

    • yea ai solved a 100x100 but how will he solve a 32767 by 32767 Edit 1: 32768x32768x32768 i mean

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • @Klack Koaster oh yeah, a human definitely solved this didnt they?

      @uwnoodle@uwnoodle4 жыл бұрын

    • @@uwnoodle The algorithm has a lot to improve and an AI may be able to develop a unique solution to overcome the flaws of the current system.

      @jjeastside@jjeastside4 жыл бұрын

  • Me (when wanted to solve a 3*3 Rubik's cube) opening KZhead... KZhead: here watch this AI solving a giant cube pls

    @VipulPatel-mf3yl@VipulPatel-mf3yl4 жыл бұрын

    • Lol

      @sallyleskys@sallyleskys3 жыл бұрын

  • It’s almost impossible to solve this but you would probably need your own planet

    @Guarhana@Guarhana3 жыл бұрын

    • Not really impossible, if it being too big to turn layers wasn’t an issue. It would just be an insanely tedious 4x4 solve. All big cubes solve the same.

      @E46SedanGaming@E46SedanGaming Жыл бұрын

  • That’s how long it takes me to solve a 3x3 Rubik’s cube

    @Franko247-@Franko247-2 жыл бұрын

  • That's gotta be the most inefficient alg I've ever seen, but I'll be damned if it doesn't work

    @aron8999@aron89994 жыл бұрын

    • Its not too bad, it averages less than 2 moves per tile. The design was a trade off, I could create an algorithm that uses less moves but requires much more cpu time or I could use a cpu friendly method that ultimately takes less time.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@shellpuppy The reason I say this is because I think it's putting every center piece into position one by one, instead of building rows.

      @aron8999@aron89994 жыл бұрын

    • As a cuber I enjoyed this where it didn’t just do a reverse scramble

      @BunnyBoing@BunnyBoing4 жыл бұрын

  • Shellpuppy I have downloaded this on github and tried to run it with Command prompt and a lot of programs but I can't get it to work, so could you please tell how to run this or make a video?

    @baactiba3039@baactiba30394 жыл бұрын

    • You need to compile it first. Here is an example kzhead.info/sun/ibuDh7mKZIekrYk/bejne.html

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@shellpuppy umm Shell Puppy You spelled Complete Wrong

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • @@PuckyDoesStuff "Compile" is a word, not a misspelling.

      @heksi3629@heksi36294 жыл бұрын

  • When the 3x3 is already too big for your hopes and dreams * Chuckles * *I'm in danger*

    @kausthubsatluri8072@kausthubsatluri80724 жыл бұрын

  • Watching this feels like waiting for the loading screen to finish.

    @suhailfarooqui7188@suhailfarooqui71882 жыл бұрын

  • Me: can’t even solve a 1x1

    @kaemonduncan6109@kaemonduncan61094 жыл бұрын

    • Yeah 1x1s are soo hard

      @eggos73@eggos733 жыл бұрын

    • no, 0×0 is harder

      @nanashi_74_@nanashi_74_3 жыл бұрын

    • @@nanashi_74_ no -1×-1

      @dQw4w9WgXcQ__@dQw4w9WgXcQ__3 жыл бұрын

    • @@dQw4w9WgXcQ__ that is calculated as 1×1 so 0×0 is harder

      @nanashi_74_@nanashi_74_3 жыл бұрын

    • Only like 7 people can solve the 1x1, so dont feel ashamed

      @E46SedanGaming@E46SedanGaming2 жыл бұрын

  • Congrats on going onto the news

    @Refinitey@Refinitey4 жыл бұрын

    • Just saw the news :D

      @peepeepoopoothepig6427@peepeepoopoothepig64274 жыл бұрын

    • Where

      @KyureiProductions@KyureiProductions4 жыл бұрын

    • what was the news tho

      @PuckyDoesStuff@PuckyDoesStuff4 жыл бұрын

    • @@PuckyDoesStuff buzzfeed did an interview if I remember correctly

      @JBolbach@JBolbach4 жыл бұрын

  • Computer solving centres: 925 seconds Computer solving edges: ~0.125 seconds Computer solving like a 3x3: Nah don't bother seconds

    @arkantyne7122@arkantyne71223 жыл бұрын

  • 13:16 the blue mixing with the white actually looks pretty cool

    @hotstuff6131@hotstuff61312 жыл бұрын

    • Ok Roma

      @luigivellucci802@luigivellucci8022 жыл бұрын

    • Imagine if you scrambled it

      @valhallacqc@valhallacqc2 жыл бұрын

  • Puts into perspective just how big this cube is when solving the edges and then solving it like a 3x3 took 0.01% of the total time

    @conantur9897@conantur98974 жыл бұрын

    • Indeed. The bigger the cube the more the centers dominate.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • Not even 0.01%. The movements are about 9500000 moves a second at peak, and there being 7.63 billion total moves makes it 0.00207326% of the cube solve. Wait, I forgot that any 3x3 scramble can be done in at most 20 moves, so really, the percentage of the 3x3 stage for the solve is: 0.00000000261885735%. Formula? Just divide 20 by the amount of moves it took to solve the cube.

      @bobczech7774@bobczech777411 ай бұрын

  • This cube took 112 days just asked Siri 👌🏼💀

    @landinleslie9164@landinleslie91644 жыл бұрын

  • I love how their was a banana chilling on top of a 32x32🤣

    @FlamezXEditz-@FlamezXEditz-2 жыл бұрын

  • This man has the world's strongest computer. Or the stats are just random numbers.

    @RGC_animation@RGC_animation2 жыл бұрын

    • He just have protection xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx enchant

      @ErdemtugsC@ErdemtugsC Жыл бұрын

  • This is actually done using algorithms so I believe you

    @jakerussell135@jakerussell1354 жыл бұрын

  • Amazing😍 What happened to the edges? In what phase have they been solved?

    @bencehervay2912@bencehervay29124 жыл бұрын

    • The edges happen at the end. But it is too fast too see. I made another video that shows the algorithm with more detail. kzhead.info/sun/ZJiKfJdleX13rH0/bejne.html

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

  • Wow! Congratulations on your ingenuity and patience to put this together! How long did the project take you to code? Just coding the alogorithm is enough of a challenge, but then all the imagery and animation... wow! Nice job!

    @kenhaley4@kenhaley44 жыл бұрын

    • shut up

      @NamAnhyyy@NamAnhyyy3 жыл бұрын

  • Cool Rubik's Cube video :D

    @darkton7359@darkton73592 жыл бұрын

  • I lay at 10pm in my bed and watch a simulation, that is solving a 32768 layers cube. PLS HELP ME

    @zfutox7224@zfutox72244 жыл бұрын

  • can we just take a second to realize that this man spent 112.75 days and 16.10714286 weeks just to empress us?

    @ameerplays4751@ameerplays47512 жыл бұрын

    • and 7.636.918.442 moves

      @somegalaxy4550@somegalaxy45502 жыл бұрын

    • I think is an auto resolution that calculate how many hours that an human have to spend to complete this cube

      @endy27876@endy278762 жыл бұрын

    • @@endy27876 nah i just used math

      @ameerplays4751@ameerplays47512 жыл бұрын

    • You mean to tell me, this shit took less than a year?

      @PastelShark123@PastelShark1238 ай бұрын

    • @@PastelShark123 exactly

      @ameerplays4751@ameerplays47518 ай бұрын

  • you:ok if you smart then solve the 99999999999999x9999999999999 Rubik’s cube. Robot: *GOES GOD OF SMART MODE ON*

    @YuXiLu123@YuXiLu123 Жыл бұрын

  • 3 x 3 cube: *exists* 32768 x 32768 cube: peasent *spits on 3 x 3 cube* 3 x 3 cube: *drowns in a 10 magnitude spit tsunami*

    @adyroger11@adyroger114 жыл бұрын

  • Computer: I’ve finally done it, 112 days..... Maker: I’ll f**king do it again... Pc: *throws itself out*

    @Gamer-cr6oe@Gamer-cr6oe4 жыл бұрын

  • If a person could execute exactly one move per second it would take a little more than 242 years to solve it.

    @kennethsowden@kennethsowden3 жыл бұрын

  • Friend: What's up? Me: Nothing, just finished solving my 32768x32768 rubik's cube.

    @oliverlebert@oliverlebert4 жыл бұрын

    • You would be surprised how accurate that is.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

  • 4096x4096 teacher teach in class, 16384x16384 homework, 32768x32768 exam, 3x3 what I remember

    @darshsalian3748@darshsalian37482 жыл бұрын

  • Its crazy how there is more people on earth than moves it took for this ai to solve this cube

    @Robloxgod-np3tp@Robloxgod-np3tp2 жыл бұрын

  • Imagine the parity you could get on that thing

    @mazehew3946@mazehew39464 жыл бұрын

  • what's this software, how to download it?

    @tariqtorun9828@tariqtorun98282 жыл бұрын

  • Only Futuristic Bot-Cuber can Solve This Giant Rubik's cube.

    @LeaveMeInPeacePlease@LeaveMeInPeacePlease5 ай бұрын

  • Checkmate, aplzrg!

    @nanamacapagal8342@nanamacapagal83424 жыл бұрын

  • Wow!! nice tutorial... it's easy and fun to learn thanks!!!

    @xione9429@xione94294 жыл бұрын

    • Thanks!

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • But it’s not a tutorial

      @mounirzreika2896@mounirzreika28962 жыл бұрын

    • @@mounirzreika2896 r/ woooosh

      @user-vk7zv3he1m@user-vk7zv3he1m2 жыл бұрын

    • @E_ lol crap I got wooshed

      @mounirzreika2896@mounirzreika28962 жыл бұрын

    • @@mounirzreika2896 yes

      @user-vk7zv3he1m@user-vk7zv3he1m2 жыл бұрын

  • How many total moves can be put?

    @arieslee6464@arieslee64644 жыл бұрын

  • Me when cube is maximized: a good amount of yellow Me when cube is minimized: *OK THAT IS A SPONGE*

    @mehdinecef@mehdinecef2 жыл бұрын

  • I have simple question-how much possibilities this cube have

    @mateuszkasprzyk1142@mateuszkasprzyk1142 Жыл бұрын

    • At least 2

      @Spaceman0025@Spaceman00254 ай бұрын

  • This is crazy

    @LimeyMimey@LimeyMimey4 жыл бұрын

  • Other people were making jokes about non-cubers so i was gonna make the "wow! Is that a world record?" joke but... This probably is actually a world record

    @stagelights_@stagelights_4 жыл бұрын

  • Im very confused, i dont see any colours exept for the finished sides.

    @toothbrush_god1@toothbrush_god14 жыл бұрын

  • Imagine if it explodes.....

    @Emerald29@Emerald294 жыл бұрын

    • Xjjkamjcdhud

      @luigivellucci802@luigivellucci8022 жыл бұрын

    • Zkzklnzoqfz mi rispondi diamante verde

      @luigivellucci802@luigivellucci8022 жыл бұрын

    • ok

      @luigivellucci802@luigivellucci8022 жыл бұрын

  • As each center is solved, it looks like it is sucking the color out of each face

    @tylerwatts4258@tylerwatts4258 Жыл бұрын

  • Someone's cousin: *solves it in 1 nanosecond*

    @okboing@okboing4 жыл бұрын

  • After the 32765 cube the next one made me feel like I am in a cursed galaxy

    @malakimorton429@malakimorton42911 ай бұрын

  • The 1000 x 1000 is technically possible but they would have to make it really tiny which would make it hard for areas

    @DSL605@DSL6052 жыл бұрын

  • No one: This guy: *Puts a T-rex to compare without there is an human*

    @BuzagZa@BuzagZa4 жыл бұрын

    • "without there is an human"

      @uwnoodle@uwnoodle4 жыл бұрын

    • @@uwnoodle ?

      @BuzagZa@BuzagZa4 жыл бұрын

    • @@BuzagZa ok im assuming english isn't your first language. "without there is an human" is grammatically incorrect.

      @uwnoodle@uwnoodle4 жыл бұрын

  • 1:09 Expectation: just a really big cube Reality: Minecraft Sand

    @GDPlainA@GDPlainA3 жыл бұрын

  • Let’s go over some math on this thing. And please if I am wrong about any of the following. Please politely correct me. 32768 = 32^3 Or put another way 32 x 32 x 32 And each face would have 32768^2 tiles which would be: 1,073,741,824 And for the whole cube? That face number x6 which equals: 6,442,450,944 tiles Someone else can work out the numbers in terms of centres and edges. I can tell you 8 corners… because it’s still a cube.

    @NovaRuner@NovaRuner8 ай бұрын

  • Why does this only got 5k views? This is amazing!

    @JL-zw7hi@JL-zw7hi4 жыл бұрын

  • Wow almost 800 moves a second!

    @ryanfortson161@ryanfortson1614 жыл бұрын

    • Each move had to swap 131,072 tiles. I recently made an improvement to the algorithm and it should be hit about 1600 moves per second.

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@shellpuppy so its really about 100 miliion tiles moved every second for the original algorithm?

      @ryanfortson161@ryanfortson1614 жыл бұрын

    • I never actually measured in tiles per second. I was able to create a formula that could estimate solve time as the size of the cube increased. It can solve a 1024x1024 in 40 seconds. 2048 x 2048 in 320 seconds...

      @shellpuppy@shellpuppy4 жыл бұрын

    • @@mulzi5131 lol

      @karinas5069@karinas50694 жыл бұрын

  • Wow you're good at cubing! Let me scramble this for you.

    @absoluteripped2746@absoluteripped2746 Жыл бұрын

  • That banana compared to the 32 x 32 x 32 cube is kinda funny lol

    @sylvester_hd5777@sylvester_hd57772 жыл бұрын

  • 6×6以上のキューブは、3×3から5×5までができれば揃えられますね！ でもこんなに大きなキューブを揃えられるのはすごいです！

    @Natrium.S@Natrium.S Жыл бұрын

    • んつるるしれつんし?をしんつ！

      @An_to_sah@An_to_sah3 ай бұрын

  • The Burj Khalifa is Giant

    @theProerr77R@theProerr77R2 жыл бұрын

  • KZhead: Wanna see a huge damn rubiks cube being solved? Me who can't solve a 3x3: *why not?*

    @ugi062@ugi0622 жыл бұрын

  • Me: sees this video. Also me: struggling on 4x4

    @thesouplord625@thesouplord6253 жыл бұрын
KZhead