[SlowMotion] 240HZ vs 144HZ vs 60HZ Test in CSGO
2020 ж. 22 Мам.
193 152 Рет қаралды
Monitor refresh rates in slow motion
Fps in Csgo locked at 400
Resolution in CSGO 1920x1080
[SlowMotion] 240HZ vs 144HZ vs 60HZ Test in CSGO
Monitor refresh rates in slow motion
Fps in Csgo locked at 400
Resolution in CSGO 1920x1080
[SlowMotion] 240HZ vs 144HZ vs 60HZ Test in CSGO
I suffered 1000 hrs to reach nova. I just thought I'm really bad at this game. Now I know being poor is a crime.
I was a global elite and my screen is 60hz
stop making excuse ur just bad
@@leminhtri2984 yeah, I guess so
Nope. You're just bad.
I'm gonna have to side with the other commenters here and say you just need to work on game sense and not raw aim. Back in the day I was LEM and almost got SMFC multiple times and that was done on a 60 hz monitor.
Racing games at higher refresh rates is beyond game changing, genuinely improved my driving.
I downgraded from a 144 hz monitor to a 60 hz because my 144 hz one broke down, now I feel pain, infinite pain, the feeling of switching back to 60 is bad
the switch back is honestly brutal
240hz isn't faster, its smoother. Enemy is still on the exact same place as in 60hz, 240hz just makes more between frames.
I recently bought RTX 4070 and i was finally able to run 240hz monitor and the difference is night and day
* i was playing on 60hz before
Congrats man
just got a RTX 4070 also looking to run the same hz haha what monitor did u buy?
@@MichaelLujan-cs1kwx2
Bruh you cannot get 240 fps with RTX 4070 in most games lol
Great test, I have 240hz tn and 165hz ips, and honestly, I fail to see a difference, at first I thought I did, for years, but then I recorded some tests myself and these days I got my highest ELO on 165hz ips... on paper 240hz and 1ms is better, but in practice, I failed to ever record more than less 1 frame of difference, and even then it was not 1 full-frame, but partially transition from one to another. 4ms and 1ms feel exactly the same, I can barely notice 165 hz vs 240hz, I can consistently score 150-160 ms reaction time on both, so I'm not too "slow" to notice.
good info bro thank you
100% u have eye problems and go see a doctor. I can see difference between 240hz and 360hz
Yeah, i think there is almost no difference to but monitor with more then 165hz, you will not see or even feel difference
If its 1440p you need to use the right display port cable 1.4 or higher. 1.2 won't support 240hz if it's 1440p. 1.2 support 1080p at 240hz but not 1440p
And some bots still say there is no difference because the human eye can't see above 60fps, shut you mouth
yeah, because human eye can't actually see more than 24 fps, not even 60 fps
@@adm1ralq you delulu man
@@adm1ralq watch 24fps video and then a 60fps video and you will see the diference
@@adm1ralq Eye doesn't have framerate. It captures light stream at 790THz, so in a way it sees at 790 trillion fps. That's how you look at eye's framerate. Eye doesn't scan retina like cameras scan cmos, it's constantly streaming raw data to your brain. Your brain doesn't have framerate either. Your brain constantly tries to use the least amount of information that is required to understand surroundings, but it doesn't cut it in images per second it analyzes motion and color changes etc. and prioritizes eventa that trigger something interesting. We would have to know how fast your neurons are firing the data from your eyes to your brain. Pennsylvania School of Medicine estimates that eyes send 10 million bits of data per second to your brain, but that doesn't translate to framerate either. US army has conducted test that can in some way be relative to framerate. They flashed images from 100/1 to several thousandth of a second and some of the tested people were able to recognize shown objects even at 1200th of a second flash. Take this information how you like, it's just not possible to think human capability to see as framerate.
@@SamukaNGL it was a joke!
the enemy moves slower with 60hz it means 60hz is the best
its client side so basically only you are seeing that, server side its all the same.
Actually the enemy appears early on higher refresh rates as compared to 60Hz. So 60hz keeps you on disadvantage as you would see the enemy on a delay and react late.
что за карта?
i got to supreme on 60hz does this mean im a pro on 240?
Supreme is shit un csgo there are bots in all of elo
How can I see the 240hz part on a 90hz screen? 😅
Its slow mo
i be on 60hz too lazy to rank up 💀 shouldve been dmg or lem already if the ranks didnt reset with cs 2
180hz is the sweet spot
такая разница будет если у тебя 500 фпс . то есть комп за 200к рублей
Szóval akkor a 60hz jobb
no u ni-
60 nah 144ok 240 great
540hz moniter is launched enjoy :P
So youre saying i can hit them easy with awp at 60hz
but think about the time when you shot hits xd
yeah but just your target should be a little bit front of...
pay to win fr
A completely ridiculous video. Hz only provides clarity in the streaming image. There's no such thing as a man leaving the wall too early. If the delay times are equal in both images, you will get the same image. When the Hz is high, you will only see the man's output fluently, that's all. These images are completely deceptive. Server ping and screen lag will only allow you to see that guy early. If this Hz value is high, you will see this early. These are just commercial traps.
thats just dumb af, if the guy is 1 pixel from apearing, it will show first with higher refresh rate, while the 60hz is just waiting to tp the guy back when reefresh cycle ends, if you actually played any fps games you would see the diference lol
comercial traps but all pros use, seems about right loooool, even phones now come with 120hz displays, god even tvs, you just another delulu ahh
@@SamukaNGLBruh, yeah but hz i like: x Hz: 0+++0+++0+++0+++0 x*2 Hz: 0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0+0 So one of frames in higher frequency will be the same as on lower. Object can appear a little earlier on higher frequency but big difference is only at smoothness. Video is incorrect, 60hZ can't always be behind 144gZ and more, it will and must lineup sometimes. Fake
@@user-um2tz8oe9p you dont understand, our brain works by filling up the gaps with information that it didnt receive, just like frame gen, to make our vision smooth, the more frames you got going into your eyes, the better and faster the prediction is, example, your eyes see an enemy running from cover, the first frames are the most important so our brain can calculate speed and the amount of tracking you need to do, the more frames you have, the more safer assumptions your brain can do, like velocity, position, etc. 60hz will not always be behind 144hz, but 144hz will always be faster, watch this video (kzhead.info/sun/hJWcncySqmOGaGw/bejne.html) and try to see if you can predict the movement of the car, try slowing the video even more, or speeding it up, you will see that your brain captures much more information at higher refresh rates, giving you an advantage.
@@user-um2tz8oe9p and yes it will lineup "some of the times" but a pro with 144hz that can do "most of the times" has an advantage over you, and that can mean win or lose a 1v1. i was years and years silver and gold in fps games, and the momment i got my 27 inch 165hz monitor i climbed to plat and diamond
honestly i prefer 60hz
you dont
Ive only ever played on 60hz lol
@@bensslightnature i do ive played 60, 144, 244 and ive gone back to 60 on games that i have low fps on when i play games like csgo or valorant etc i play 144 as i sold 244 didnt see any difference by that could be due to my low reaction time
@@HK5-ROCKSTAR what's your rank on these games : valorant and csgo ? I play on 60hz too
@@scorpionners valorant my peek was ascendant csgo is kinda useless cuz global is easy asf to get so highest faceit level is 8 got bored and back in the day ESEA A+ still have it actually