Go to www.hellofresh.com/50sidebar and use code 50sidebar for 50% off plus 15% off the
next 2 months!
During high-profile trials, emotions run high and presentations occasionally become intense, leading to heated confrontations in the courtroom. The Law&Crime Network’s Jesse Weber breaks down the top seven most heated moments between lawyers and judges during trials.
Listen to Law&Crime's Sidebar Podcast on Apple & Spotify:
Apple: apple.co/3wMgRgB
Spotify: spoti.fi/3wITe7b
Hosts:
Jesse Weber: / jessecordweber
Angenette Levy: / angenette5
LAW&CRIME SIDEBAR PRODUCTION:
KZhead Management - Bobby Szoke
Podcasting - Sam Goldberg
Video Editing - Michael Deininger
Guest Booking - Alyssa Fisher
Social Media Management - Kiera Bronson
#Court #Judge #LawAndCrime
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on KZheadTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandCrimeNewsletter
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.com/podcasts/
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK KZhead CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
Go to www.hellofresh.com/50sidebar and use code 50sidebar for 50% off plus 15% off the next 2 months!
They're all as bent as each other, there is no such thing as justice in the United Nazi States of America.
Great Show
Just saying your background is creeping me out. I’m retired and I watch your show but it looks like blood splattered from behind the walls behind you. Couldn’t they pick out different colors???
Double dipping in ad revenue, are we?
HelloFresh is crap, arrives in terrible unsealed packaging, poor quality, tiny portions, is expensive and customer service is abysmal. Order today and cancel tomorrow!
That first judge getting so mad at the "children" comment, proves the point the lawyer was making. EXACTLY THE POINT!!!
Actually a really good point lol. She completely misunderstood what he said. However that defense team was horrible in their conduct throughout trial. So im sure it was building up in her.
@@YoBrand15you're correct. The defense team was incredibly disrespectful to the judge as well as the family of the victim.
Yep and she was forced to resign after this because she’s clearly not fit to be judge.
@@MidgetPunterthat’s probably true but still gives no right to the judge to claim a threat was made against her children as that clearly didn’t happen
@@Snap-Time That’s not what happened nor what was even said in this video. Judges are not “forced to resign” except by the Florida Bar, which as mentioned, a censure/reprimand didn’t get the chance to occur because she resigned prior to that happening.
Years ago, I challenged a speeding ticket in court. Before I could finish my presentation, provide evidence, etc., the judge cut me off, said I was done, ordered me to pay the fine or go to jail. I paid, left the courthouse, and the next week filed a complaint with the judicial fitness commission in Oregon. Eventually, the judge was suspended without pay for a month.
same in the England, dirtier sovreign citizens who share the same brain, in making human misery into money.
r/thathappened
@@therain1189that could've easily happened.. it happens all the time, stay off of reddit for a little while my friend
Getting into a fight with a judge is like a passenger yelling at the pilot.
Backseat lawyering😂😂😂
Wrong....Judges are elected.
More like his temper tantrum is gonna give him some serious time out. He should have just plead guilty once he thought he could throw lip like that.
Or a cop arresting the passenger for the driver speeding
No, it's worse. The pilot and the passenger share the same fate. I think it's more like a movie where the pilot has a heart attack and a passenger with no training tries to land the plane with instructions from the ground. Yeah, it's like getting into an argument with ground control.
Judge Darrow showed a GREAT deal of restraint during Darrell Brooks tantrums, i applaud her! She endured all of that disruption, time wasting and insults so that he had less chance on any appeal. To be as disrespected as she, prosecution, witnesses and family members of victims was just showed his lack of value for human life and common decency!!!
She just didn’t want the activists coming after her
@@rikityrikoh shut up he was extremely out of line and he got the sentences he deserved
@@romansbottom I absolutely agree, he was out of line. She should of dropped the hammer on him at least more than she did. Why didn’t she?
I totally agree with you on that
Florida Supreme Court fired for Her, clearly didn’t handle it well, she actually acted very badly, and is gone due to her actions eat your own words😮😮😮
OK that first judge was grand standing and I remember a bunch of witnesses saying "if they were your children." So the guy is not wrong. The judge was totally out of line
That’s what I thought too. She’s only validating the defense attorney’s concern.
@rikityrik I was thinking the same thing...she was proving his point.
Too emotional.
She is not fit to be a judge if that’s her temperament I feel bad for anyone who was unjustly sentenced due to her emotion.
@@kelsoriche3637 That's why she's not a judge anymore - she was heavily criticized for the way she handled the trial and was forced to resign as a judge shortly after. So at least she got her karma.
some of these cases are huge examples of just how lacking our justice system has grown. political or other ideological biases have no place in the court room.
Political judges and prosecutors are nothing new. Their campaigns have been funded by political caucuses forever.
Yeah it amazing people don’t see the bias the judge held in the rittenhouse trial, it was absolutely disgusting to watch. But people don’t care because their own personal bias is the only reason they cared so much about rittenhouse being made a pariah In the first place.
@dizzleslaunsen2372 Kyle Rittenhouse is innocent. It, clearly, shows it on video and should not have gone to court at all.
@@Matthew-Anthony He was innocent but I think a trial was probably justified to work out if he really did fear for his life and to work out why he really went to the area that day. I think because he said he went to protect businesses armed it could be concluded that he intended to shoot someone that day regardless of the circumstances and that he was opposed to the protesters ideologically so it could be construed that he wanted to kill them for that reason. Then there was the fact he was underaged to carry that gun and came from out of state. They probably should have put him on trial for different charges. The government really does not like vigilantes as they aren't trained and stuff like this happens.
@@dizzleslaunsen2372 The judge conducted the Court properly. Give examples of some kind of misconduct. Your own bias is showing.
“ThE dEfEnDaNt” I’m laughed so hard
he was right. he crazy but right
He was right 😢
She absolutely tricked him out of his position 😂😂😂
I got one ear and I'm the only one that heard that?
That first judge treated the attorney like this was kindergarten and she was a teacher lol
She wigged out over that children comment. Methinks she doesn't/can't have children.
@@shovelmastaflashEven if she was baron bringing up the judges kids in front of a defendent who likely will hold resentment towards her potentially putting them in danger. It was completely uncalled for.
@@melvincanada264 That's the argument the defense attorney was making about his own children then the judge spazzed out when he made the analogy to her. She's just a hypocrite.
@@shovelmastaflash because the comments made to the defense attorney weren't directly about his kids, the comments made to the judge were
@@anthonydiaz5349Fair enough, but the attorney was attempting to explain his perspective and instead of trying to come to an understanding, the judge immediately misunderstood and got angry. It's just makes her look immature. Borderline hysterical.
I have NEVER seen so much patience in a person as I did with the judge in the parade killing. She had an insane amount of professionalism.
I watched it live. She wasn't patient, she was weak and emotional. She allowed Darrell Brooks to run her court room. She would send him to the other court room then bring him right back in. She made a mockery of the court and victims' families. NO Male judge would have done that.
@@chiefkyle1098 I watched it live too. There is a thing called due process. She was legally required to let him try to make his case since he was representing himself. It is required of her or any other judge. A man would’ve had to do the same thing, he just would’ve lost his temper and yelled more, which would put the case in jeopardy of being a mistrial.
@@chiefkyle1098 "weak and emotional"??? let's see how you'd handle a court case in which you're forced by law to give the man that represents himself a chance to make his case, knowing that he has 76 criminal counts of attempted murder 6 of which are actual murder and he's having a f**king evil af staredown at you, all while you're forced to let him speak because he represents himself. would you break the code and risk losing your position as judge? if yes then you're too "weak and emotional" to be a judge. That's not what "being a man" is, that's "being a fool" is.
@@chiefkyle1098she gave him way too many chances I get what you’re saying. Yes, she tried to be open and let him shovel the dirt on himself but time after time it was “I’m warning you, this is the last time, THIS is the last time…If you say one more thing..” over and over. The second time should’ve been it. He cursed her he threatened her he’d glare and slam things. It was too much. It was impossible to watch. She’d start every day with warnings that he’d disobey the moment he spoke. Any reasonable judge would’ve warned once maybe twice then booted him. He was clearly unstable trying to threaten and scare the woman.
@@Helliox well said That's why SHE earned HER position as a JUDGE
I absolutely loved the alternative contempt sentences for people in that one courtroom. I think that 17 page essay on professionalism wil have a deeper impact.
Absolutely agreed! How badly he wanted to just pay a $1000 fine.
Those sanctions literally had me laughing out loud to a point where my partner asked what was so funny (I'm listening on earbuds). I'm a pretty good writer and although I have a degree in a scientific field, I often counted on any writing assignment as an easy A and a way to boost my grade points. So as soon as he said the topic of the paper, but for a crazy 17 pages, I immediately thought to discuss it for that long I would include all professions that interact in the courtroom. So I think the essay would get me in trouble as I would most certainly have to include the professionalism of judges, as well, and the judge may take that as a swipe at them. But seriously......10 major and 10 minor sources to site? HAHAHAHA I'd have offered to double the fine!!!
Yea that was an epic move. Educate them and give them some real pain instead of some simple monetary penalty that they would most likely not even notice.
I wonder if he wrote it or had an intern at the law firm write it for him?
Nah, that judge is an arrogant jerk.
That first judge literally proved that attorneys point. If it were about her children she wouldn’t tolerate it. And she didn’t and kicked him out. The irony is palpable
She excused him because he was speaking out of line/breaking procedure. Not because the attorney insulted her kids and she was angry
@@screamtheteam12345 Nah, it was clearly because she got butthurt.
@@screamtheteam12345Yeah dude grow a brain. She was being ridiculous.
@@Florin_NeaguExactly! All he said was - what if it was spoken about your children. How is that threatening? She misused her power. Such entitled judges.
@@screamtheteam12345 no, she literally said “you’re threatening my kids” about five times
Where did he threaten her children? He said someone said something about his kids. She said she didn’t remember that. He said well if it was your children you’d remember that.
He didn't threaten them he should've never brought them up. Completely inappropriate and as she said the people in rows as well as the defendent wouldn't know she was a mother but by telling them that you potentially put them in danger.
I was wondering the same thing. I did't think the Judge acted that bad.
the female judge is out of line against that guy...shes way above her league and should be removed as a judge...telling people they cant smile or laugh? what is this soviet union?
He had no business bringing up her children or personal life or trying to imply that she doesn't care about anything else other than her own.
@@JohnSmith-pj6wb The defense side was rude throughout the entire thing, primarily sticking to flipping the bird at the prosecuting side and the victims but also made remarks that would have made a grown man beat them to within an inch of their lives due to how bad some of them were. That case was of a child killer and the moment the defense lawyer brought up that line about if she had/has children she decided enough was enough and brought the hammer down on the lawyer, he had ZERO right to even insinuate that in a court setting.
She literally proved his point 😭😭
Buddy saying the judge was not out of line but then why is the judge gone why did she resign after this LOL because she knew she was out of line
@@joeytyler5072 Or maybe she is tired of the Bull $hit. Attorney did not prove anything was said about his kids, dude didnt even ask the stenographer to read back what was said. It was all contrived BS to take the focus off the trial. The dude is upset about his kids even being mentioned, when he is defending a person who gunned down other peoples kids.
@@dustinbarlow1623 Nope. She realized she is a Karen and not suitable to be a judge.
@@kael7953 LOL I Love pure butt hurt in the morning.
Man, some of these Judges seem super petty and like they are power tripping, hard. Thats exactly what we DON"T need in our justice system.
They're probably all die-hard fans of Judge Judy and are trying to become like her...
@@JustChill_1031That's actually funny. 😂
Unpopular opinion women shouldn’t be in charge of a job that has that type of stress level.
Making that dude write a 17 page paper with TEN references is amazing 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The prosecutor who questioned Kyle Rittenhouse on his silence after being arrested, was amazing to see. Almost everyone knows that while being arrested, "YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT".
They wanted so bad to make Kyle out to be a right wing extremist that shot peaceful protestors and just couldn't cut it
Kyle is still a murderer.
@mestupkid211986 a sworn Judge, a competent jury and more than half the country say you are wrong.
@@mestupkid211986When and where did Kyle Rittenhouse commit murder? He definitely did not do it during the Democrats "peaceful protests" which caused $1-2 billion nationwide.
Many do not have the ability, though
"Don't get brazen with me" is my all-time favorite judge quote of all time!
That judge made sure a murderer went free.
@@Raccoon_Mama. Self defense isn't murder, but ok lol
@@Raccoon_Mama. u are pathetic
@@Raccoon_Mama. lmao what
"On June 2, 2023, the Florida Judicial Qualifications Commission found that Scherer violated many rules governing judicial conduct during Cruz's trial. Scherer "unduly chastised" public defender Melisa McNeill and her team, wrongly accused one Cruz attorney of threatening her child, and improperly embraced members of the prosecution team after the trial's conclusion. The Commission recommended a public reprimand for Scherer.[12] The public reprimand was issued the next month."
I thought Florida is the State that Sheriff Grady Judd says is tough on crime? The judicial system reprimanded the judge in a mass murder case with a bunch of school kids? Unbelievable!
Thank you. I wondered
She resigned from the bench, but I sure hope any future prospective employers take her behavior and that official reprimand into consideration before hiring her.
The Brooks Trial is proof that judges, despite the defendant's behavior, go mostly above and beyond to ensure that the defendant receives a completely fair trial and that at a cases conclusion, there is close to NILL grounds for an appeal.
lol she didn’t want to give him any chance for an appeal 😂 Perfect!!
The judge giving essays is my hero!! The APA format and primary and secondary sources are brilliant.
By the Judge's actions of ordering the lawyer to proceed to the rear of the room she simultaneously proved his point that if they were talking about her kids she'd perceive it as inappropriate as he mentions 🤣
Right smh
still, would
All he said was that if they were talking about her kids she'd remember and she freeeeeeaked out. She was not disrespected and proved that she only cares about things when it concerns her, LIKE HE SAID. He was 100% correct. What a disgusting excuse for a human.
@@knifeyonline well she was forced to resign so at least she got what she deserved.
It makes you wonder if all her children were adopted or from a previous marriage and she wasn't in fact unable to have kids
That Florida judge proved the lawyers point by completely misunderstanding what the lawyer said
For real. The guy had a point and she proved it when she completely went off thinking he was talking about her children when he wasnt
The patience of the attorneys and judge to not yell ….. shut up and ….. bull#### is amazing
That first judge is a crybaby hypocrite. Doesn’t care about the defence lawyers concern [about comments towards his kids] but once he asks her how she would feel if comments were made about her kids she goes ballistic. LITERALLY proving his whole point. Then she proceeds to lie by saying “to try to threaten my children”. Which didn’t happen. He said “if they were talking about your children you would have definitely noticed it.”
She didn't lie, those defense lawyers were completely out of line!
@@kgrkidnot in that specific instance. Judges are meant to be impartial, not petty, emotional and hypocritical.
The defense attorneys were unprofessional in the Cruz case. But the judge shouldn’t be responding with unprofessionalism either.
@@Nelly8812 Unfortunately we see this in America far too often these days. We should start a nationwide crusade that says "It's cool to act like an adult" lol
The judge was beyond ridiculous in the first one. Right or not, the attorney simply said she would have noticed if someone spoke about HER kids. Not once did he threaten her kids or speak negatively about her kids. What ethical violations did he commit?? Get over yourself lady
3:50 that lawyer did not threaten the judges children. All he said was that she would also be offended if people were making comments about her children like they were about his. You would think a judge would be less emotional
And she was offended about it to prove his point
Ordering them to buy lunch and write essays is absolutely amazing. I have no context to what led to that, but it makes me think they were acting like children so the judge punished them as such.
That's not amazing, but alarming.
@@lousimms4766 Why is that alarming?
@@ChrisTessmer its not alarming. It happens. This person is being silly saying its alarming. The alternative was the judge would sentence them to jail time and/or fines for being in contempt of court. The judge was going easy on them.
@ChrisTessmer because that is not in a judges job description OR within his/her authority as a judge. Buy lunch and write an essay?? What is this? High school detention or a court of law?
I would imagine those lawyers' time would be better spent in preparing for the cases being held in court, rather than writing a 17 page essay. I'd refuse if I was told to do that.
Great segment :) I liked the pacing, selection of cases, and the amount of commentary was just right.
You said it perfectly!
Totally agree
The first lawyer was absolutely not “out of line”. The judge just realized that she zoned out and missed a highly inappropriate comment, and got defensive
Yeah she argued from a point of hurt ego for sure
Yeah she was in the wrong you could tell when she started to stutter when responding she had no idea what was going on, and he never threatened her children
She’s the worst judge ever. Over emotional, irrational and the exact opposite of judicial. It’s hard for a judge to make you feel for the defense of a school shooter.
I4d be genuinely concerned when a judge reads "IF it was about your children" as "I'm threatening YOUR children." Such a person cannot serve justice with that much bias and pettiness. Glad she's out of the job. A disgrace.
The first interaction wasn't okay. The judge agreed it was out of line but only when it applied to her.
I think that's why she resigned.
The Brooks case is what happens when someone who has no clue about the law tries to represent themselves. I was embarrassed for him.
I kind of miss watching his trial it was enjoyable to watch tbh lol
Maybe he’s planning on having his conviction overturned by claiming his lawyer was incompetent 😂
@@Young30542yeah I'm not going to lie I was glued to that trial every day
Telling the lawyer to leave because he spoke on your children because he was objecting to the statements about them talking about his children is crazy
Exactly 😂 such a hypocrite
Crazy is not see in why.
@@user-br9vr3jq6hdid she spill her drink or something, why was she sitting on a rag
context matters - that guys client was being absolutely disgusting towards victims and their families the entire trial and he didn't care - but he wants to complain about victim impact statements? He's the one acting like it's egregious to talk about kids, and then literally does EXACTLY what he's complaining about to the judge - so let that sink in.
@@truecrimejungle it’s hypocrisy all around lol it’s very ironic tho
Bro if the judge ordered me to do a essay rather then jail, I will write that essay. We lock up enough of our populace 😂
Got some serious Vinny Gambini vibes when that judge asked how the essay was coming along…”You were serious about that?”
Wow. As an attorney of 20 years myself, some of those as a prosecutor, seeing these attorneys get yelled at is just😬
To be honest when I was in middle school I wanted to be a judge to yell at people 😂 but that’s not the point of that job 😂😂😂
😆
I tried yelling to my teacher that she was out of order when she told me to stop whispering back and forth with my friend. THANKFULLY she went into momentary shock then started cracking up. I was in first grade. My next 3 years there she'd smile and nod and say "Your Honor" every time I walked by her class. 😂😂😂
The only judge in the world who has the luck and the clearance to do that would probably be Judge Judy! 😂
😂😂😂
How screwed must you feel when your attorney and the judge get in a shouting match?
That Judge for the Nikolas Cruz trial had very poor relations with everyone involved with the trial. She always was arguing with them.
Judge in the case of the guy who ran over multiple people and killed 6 of them: "I will sentence you to 6 life sentences. But I am sentencing you to, like, 700+ years in prison, just to be sure..."
Judge, he didn't threaten your kids. you're on a power rush
yup and the B*tch got exactly wut she deserved Thats why its not gud to allow females to be judges Soon as its their time of the month they can't control their emotions
Still don’t know how Binger didn’t lose his law license after that awful exhibition of a trial. Highly unethical at a few times during the trial.
He seemed so condescending
Binger deserves Street Justice.
That Cruz kid makes my blood boil. Thoughts for the Victims and their families from Ireland ☘️
3:40 counsel never threatened the judge's children. never even came close to it. he asked how she'd feel in his shoes if someone were to bring up her kids out of the blue at trial and she not only took exception but somehow read "threat" from it? unhinged.
This would suck if judge Judy was the judge for every person on this video 😂😂
😂😂😂
True but, It’d be a better world.
Suck? That would be AWESOME!!
That 1st judge was just way too emotional and over the top.
The first judge, a lady, is the opposite of how good judges conduct themselves. Raising her voice, getting personal, telling him to go sit there like he was a kid.
First judge made a fool of herself while power tripping and lost her job because of it!
Wow...Judge Dorow is the most patient judge I have ever seen.
First judge was way out of line. Defense counsel was saying that the victim impact statements were referencing him and his kids personally. Judge said she missed it. He was saying it happened. And then she intentionally misinterpreted what he said as some kind of threat against her kids? Unhinged.
First Judge: First off, he didn’t threaten her children. Secondly, she proved his point
I just can't get over this first judge. Dude says he doesn't appreciate the comments about his children. Judge doesn't care. He says she'd care if they were talking about her children. Her response: "How dare you bring up my children!"
She literally said she wasn't told about any comments being made. And then brings up her children
She said she didn’t remember ever mentioning his children. Our system is screwed up because it’s all about being nice to the criminals. And then people complain when criminals are let out of jail or charges dismissed.
I love the petty judge that makes people write essays 😂😂
The brooks trial must have been incredible frustrating for everyone else involved other than the defendant. I know we all understand why but how people didn’t crack the shits is beyond me.
The mfer watched a couple of Law & Order episodes, remembered a couple of big words and thought he could go toe to toe with the law. Judge put him in his place quick lol.
I agree! I watched the entire trial and so many times I wanted to just grab Brooks and shake him. He was so disrespectful it was absolutely infuriating. I can't imagine if my parents or children had been hurt by him then having to listen to his stupidity. Also, equally infuriating was the fact that he was out on bond for a very similar crime just weeks earlier.
18:14 This is my favorite one. Judge forces someone to buy lunch and another to write an essay on the importance of professionalism! OMG i love this judge.
That one judge asking the attorney how his "paper" was coming along after getting onto the other one for not buying lunch just brought back memories of my high-school English teacher lol
The stare down 😂😂😂 15:45
Ok, say what you want about that POS’s defense team, the bizarre way they acted, and the the disrespectful attitude they held towards the prosecution and even some of the families of the victims at times, but when he simply said “Judge, i think if they had brought YOUR children into this, you might have remembered..” For the judge to then FREAK out, and act like he just “threatened” her children, is INCREDIBLE. She wouldnt even TOLERATE the very mentioning of the phrase “your children” in reference to herself, but when its aimed at the defense attorney, she doesnt say JACK S, doesn’t care, it didn’t matter AT ALL to her. That whole interaction makes her look VERY biased if you’re able to watch it with an unbiased eye yourself. In NO WAY did he “threaten her children” as she tried to imply while she was shaming him. Thats one of the MOST hypocritical moments I’ve ever seen from a judge…
That first judge was ridiculous. I'm utterly confused by her. He simply stated that if someone brought up _her_ children in that manner, she'd have noticed. From that she deduces that he's threatening her children? How did she manage to become a judge?
The JUDGE at Cruz’s trial was way over her head. She fell for the bringing kids into the discussion big time.
You Cruz defenders are the worst
The fact that theres a judge who holds people accountable by making them guy their team lunch and write papers is hilarious😂
It makes the court look ridiculous IMO.
#1 - Judge was way out of line. The attorney didn't say anything remotely like a threat toward her children. His words started out to be something to the effect of, "If it was your children that someone brought up like the other side did, you would be upset." Then, somewhat ironically, she went nuts even though her children were NOT spoken of in any negative way, let alone was no threat directed at her children. That reeked of a judge putting on show because she knew it was on TV.
So refreshing to see tough, fair, caring judges about victims !! ❤
Great video Jesse!
8:07 I've seen the same thing with an "expert" witness being heavy biased towards the paying council, luckily not my expert witness.
The judge who refused $1,000 in lieu of the 17 page essay is an amazing man. He wasn't looking for a quick fix and genuinely wanted that lawyer to truly understand his point and learn from that experience. It would've been in the state's best interest to collect that $1,000 instead, but he did what he felt was fair and just. Very admirable to have a judge with so much honor and integrity, and I do hope that lawyer learned despite his older age.
Great video ! Thank you 😊
These compilations are outstanding! 😅👏👏
That 1st judge seemed unhinged and like she didn't listen to anything including logical arguments.
In the first situation, he was upset someone brought his kids into it. The judge dismissed his feelings but when her kids were brought into it, she freaked out. Maybe there was more to it but it seemed more to prove his point.
First judge has lost her damn mind. It's ok to talk about the attorneys kids, but if the attorney tries to get the judge to understand his point of view, the Judge loses her damn mind. She shouldn't be a judge.
The lawyer wasn't at all threatening that judges children. He was just making a point/example after she just was blowing him off. Saying he knows what he heard and if it was said about her children, how she wouldn't forget then which is true. The judge was out of line in that circumstance.
She got mad about the same thing the lawyer was upset about😂 Wth
She even proved his point by getting mad.
I'm pretty sure she got punished for this. Check her Wikipedia
@@1stAccount-we3yb No, the judge was highly unprofessional - hence why she's now off the bench
@JoeCnNd so you all defend that homicidal maniac
Every time Brooks comes up in one of these videos, I just have to skip. If I go the rest of my life without hearing his voice ever again, I’ll die a happy man.
Great reporting.
That first judge has no idea about rules of civil procedure and ethics. Horrible. An embarrassment to our justice system.
Call me sexist but women shouldn’t be judges man, they’re too emotional, she was just showing who was the boss
That first judge was totally insane. What a complete narcissist. No one threatened her children, yet that is what she got out of what was being said.
but isn't that women in general... They hear what they want to hear
The defense was acting horribly the entire trial, including joking around, laughing, and flipping off the court, all caught on video. Let's not forget that he killed multiple children. She had enough of their disrespect to the court and the victims.
@@Noah-tn7pq Found the stereotypical, misogynistic incel… “All women bad! Men good!”
She must be related to Judge Judy...
ew no lmfao. they were acting terrible the entire time and bringing up someone’s children in a mass homicide shooting case, is DISGUSTING. he deserved it.
To the last judge: This is an "adult" you are talking to. So giving multiple warnings is inappropriate and inadequate. Sanction the jerk!!
How does it work when for example, Alex Jones is ordered to pay such obscene amounts of money that he doesnt' have? Does he spend his life now working and paying it all to these families? How much does this judgment actually hurt him? For example OJ owes the families millions, but he still collects his NFL pension which is six figures, lives in a mansion, and lives leisurely where it appears money still isnt' an object to worry about for him. So how are these cases actually paid out and resolved?
That first judge is so unprofessional, disrespectful and emotional. What a hypocrite on a power trip.
14:30 Brooks is not only an EVIL person he's also not very clever, I guess the old adage about being your own lawyer was definitely true in this case ! Lots of...interesting...happenings in this video
Brooks is really the worst case of Dunning-Kruger ever. That's what happens if someone considers himself much smarter than he actually is. So glad that they still managed to get the trial through and sentence him.
First judge was completely out of line. Ironic, she flips out about the same thing that she expected the lawyer to turn the other cheek about because "she didn't hear it". Glad it cost her the robe
The last Judge was like help me help you...
Darrell my jam. Such a POS. I thought his eyeballs would fall out and he would drive right trough them with his red SUV and would honk at them.
Parkland judge was unqualified to handle this case.
Rittenhouse judge is unqualified to handle ANY case
The judge in Brooks' case was unbelievably patient. What was Brooks thinking acting like that? That he would be so intimidating or so loud that everyone would just say "oh, man, just get out of here a free man, just so we don't have to deal with such a "tough" grown-up" or what was his logic??
The first judge is an emotional trainwreck. There is no place for this kind of emotion when judgement is involved.
I couldn't agree more, insane freakout and needs a psychological evaluation.
E. Scherer was appalling throughout the entire trial in Florida. That she resigned before a decision about her diabolical behaviour was taken, proves, at least to me, that she knew she was completely partial during the whole trial.
what was wrong about her being that way? that kid deserved it. he didn’t deserve anything.
Oh f off, the prosecution was shooting the bird, wasting time, etc. The whole thing was a clown show
@@abrilstorm she's supposed to be impartial... that's the point
@@abrilstorm A judge still has to be as impartial and neutral as possible throughout the whole trial, that's her job and she failed at it. There's a reason she was forced to resign as a judge shortly afterward.
Her bias was visible from space, she’s lucky the jury saved her from a sentence that the office would appeal. She would have gone down as a historical robed goof if they’d had a full trial she botched this badly.
How funny that she thinks he's silly for a side comment about his children, but as soon as he LITERALLY does the same thing to her like he was done..... HOW DARE HE!!!!! Oh the hypocrisy 🙄🙄
You do know she was forced to resign after that right
Yeah, ironically, she just totally proved the point he made.
thank you
"Subject matter jurisdiction" really takes me back...
It still makes me mad that someone lied to get on the jury, said yes, that they could give someone the death penalty if that is what is needed. Then says, sorry I just couldn’t do it. Even though the evidence supports that.
He wasn’t a lawyer per say but he was a lawyer pro se 😂😂😂😂😂
This is awesome
Very interesting to watch.
Loved this video!!!!😂
We know how last names link back to our origins. That one dude straight up left to take a nap. Lol
Enjoyed watching this, thanks for compiling it! I have connected with Daniel Ogbeide Law, PLLC, such an experienced lawyer, we are close to winning this case
I ordered Hello Fresh for my daughter and they were unable to accommodate menu changes to accommodate her request for no pork. She ended up giving the meat to another friend and discontinuing her Hello Fresh trial.
I could not help but to burst out laughing @ 15:45 😂😂😂😂😂 His face. 🗿😡
I also have to laugh every time I see that face, too.🤣🤣 Perfect meme material.🤣🤣
This just shows me the only thing that separates judges and lawyers from criminals, is capital and or opportunity. Some of these men acted completely unprofessional.
That's literally what their jobs are. Judges and attorneys are never to be trusted. Judges don't even need a law degree to be a judge lmao.
Or women.