The Biggest Numbers in the World Size Comparison
2020 ж. 21 Шіл.
3 011 110 Рет қаралды
What's the largest number you can imagine? Trillions of trillions? If you're not a professional mathematician and not some cool physicist, the answer is probably approximate. And could we visualize this number? Nope, we're not going to write out all of those zeros on paper. I suggest having a look at a device that shows the total number of atoms in the universe. And even surpasses it. I agree, this doesn't sound very realistic. But such a mechanism does exist, and I managed to find it.
#eldddir #eldddir_space #numbers #space
"No matter How large a number is, It is still closer to 0 than to infinity"
Yes, exactly! Nearly all natural numbers are bigger. Anyway I find it more difficult to understand Graham's number, TREE(3) or others than infinity. Strange....
Not ending a quote annoys my SO MUCH
Aeronn Charles Camza no, 9 going on forever is the largest number therefore it’s closer to infinity
Remember that infinity isn't a number, just a symbol representing the theoretical idea of a never-ending set of something. It's possible that everything is finite, even time itself.
Hassan Ali Husseini same here
Even if I could spin the first gear at the speed of light. It still won't even come close to turning the last gear. :)
It has to eventually :D
Turn the wheel from the other side
@@chandlerstevens4498 undermined reply
Omg thats really you?
Wow... what is the farthest you have been
A quintillion is pretty easy to imagine in the real-life scale. Imagine a small cube with an edge of one millimeter. Then imagine a cube with a one kilometer edge. There is one quintillion millimeter-cubes in a single kilometer-cube.
Wouldn’t that be 1 million?
interesting
@@robertmichel8456 Cubic Metrics grow faster,
@@robertmichel8456 That’s what I though until I found something. See, cubic meters grow 3 times as fast as regular meters. 1 km = 10^6 mm 1 squared km = 10^12 squared mm 1 cubic km = 10^18 cubic mm Here, he is talking about cubic km and cubic mm, so the correct equation is the third one. Thank you for understanding.
@@Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger nice comma instead of period. it makes total sense to swap them like we are doing,
Fun fact about Googolplex: If you were to write it out, each and every zero, you would run out of space. Even if you had the superpower to write a zero on every atom in the observable universe, you would still run out of space, as googolplex has 10^100 zeroes, but there are only about 10^80 atoms in the entire observable universe.
Wow
notice how it is only observable. what about the undiscovered ? the mass that gets sucked in by a black hole?
@@skierx Oh true
You would need to write a 0 on every atom of 10^20 observable universes to write out googolplex.
shut up dude
Me, an intellectual: *infinity* Vsauce: **starts explaining why i’m wrong**
Lol
Hey! Vsauce, Michale here
Kian Saliany you are are right but it is a meme, yes omega is the biggest number, i know that, i’m not stupid like you’d like to think
Zack Max alif null is an example
You guys are such nerds^Googol
Has he tried spinning the mechanism from the other side? Imagine how fast the first wheel would spin xD
So fast it will break space time and reality in it's entirety will vanish... Literally the destroyer of the universe
But I am pretty sure it is just unisense spin
@Sentience100 erwinruff meant to spin the last gear instead of the first. That's a good question 😊
It needs an unimaginable force
U need all the energy in a black hole to do this.
I love how mathematicians are always competing to see who can think of the number with the most zeros
agustin rayo already won i think
I made a number eeeeion
It's really so much more than 'that.'
@@silksonic3927 Rayo's number is more of a thought experiment. Nobody has a clue how the number is actually constructed, let alone what any of its digits are.
Search up Centillion
"The biggest imaginable number is Graham's Number." *Laughs in Rayo's Number*
Chuckles in ♾+1
@@wv6309 laughs in ♾️
**Laughs in 100 pigalipontivalogifaribodigrofidojigillion** (10∞)
remember kids, infinity is not a number, it's a loop
laughs in omega to the power of omega to the power of omega to the power of omega
The thumbnail is horrifyingly out of scale
The one and only ikr
last one is mrbeast's money
Yeah graham's number isn't that 'small'
Yeah, u can only fit 10 to the power of 184 plank size object in the whole universe and a Graham’s number is way bigger than a googol
saranqxv googol is 10 to the 100th and but Graham’s number is so much big that difference doesn’t even matter at its scale
You can only put a comma if you have 3 digits coming after it. The fact that you end with one zero irritates me.
Comment until it reaches to a googol
Extreme Demon Kill him
@@clickmaestro595 o.o
Id do this, 100.000.000.000,00
@Extreme Demon make him do that many attempts on ya Also my friend says miliseconds ans hundrenths of seconds are the same lol
Robots in 10,000 years: counting every atom in the universe
According to my calculations, even 1 googol quectometers minus the speed of light is still a positive number, which means rotating the 100th gear on the mechanism is faster than the speed of light.
Biggest numbers in the world: My student loan: am I a joke to you?
My knowledge:am i a Joke to you both?
@@golbox4 yes
@@SpaceIsAwesome0358 then your wrong Idk If this was a Joke but i laughed
@@golbox4 the comment is indeed a joke
@@golbox4 me who knows there are secert numbers bigger than infinity:my knowledge is beyond infinity.
Skips the number "Sextillion" , Cause- yes.
ölölöööl
Oh uhhhh... XD yeah cuz it has the word sex in it
He's such a noob
@@shanghim680 I'm sorry what
@@nibsin noob
As a cuber I was waiting for you to mention the 43 quintillion scrambles on the Rubik's Cube
Same
I like how he skipped 10^21 😂
Well... The number is... weird.
Yea
Sextilion 😅
Was expecting him to start with “This is Arnold”
Same hahaa
Me too Vrlplex
Wait- Are they the same narator?
@@chibi_okami look at the subscription
@@chibi_okami but if it wasnt there its on the description
I'm irritated that he doesn't describe the largest number.
Zahay Bone the largest number is 9 going on forever
kzhead.info/sun/mJSxetucmqJ3h4U/bejne.html
Graham’s number isn’t the largest number, the largest number with a non Semantic explanation is rayos number
Number is infinite. There are no exact highest number ever
Sean Arcade Dela cruz yes there is, the largest one digit number is 9, numbers larger than 9 are made up of other one digit numbers, 247 for example there’s a 2 a 4 and a 7. So if you use 9 and say 9 goes on forever, this would be the largest number, since 9 is the largest one digit number.
That really got me with that thumb nail 😂😂
Bro explained an entire science and/or a math class in 10 minutes
You didn't even define Graham's Number. Now that we have specifically defined all of these things and given concrete examples of them in the universe, here is a term that is bigger with no definition, no comprehension, and no context. End of video.
Haha! It's still not even close to Rayo's Number.
What's about TREE(3) and the SSCG-function?
҉ Paralativ i was just thinking this, grahams number, being as uncomprehensively large as it is, is miniscule in comparison to TREE(3)
@@billmanbillman7894 There's many more larger numbers than TREE(3). Rayo's number would be F(n) = The least number that cannot be uniquely described by an expression of first-order set theory that contains no more than n symbols. Rayo's number is then just F(10^100) though, we can still go even further with G(n) such that G(n) grows more quickly than F(n). At the end, these numbers still remain within the finite realm, once you leave you'll face with multiple infinities. The smallest infinity being Aleph 0, followed by Aleph 1, Aleph 2, Aleph 3...
@@welcometoreality437 if you use functions to define big numbers, it just gets boring... The point of TREE(3) and Graham's number is that they define really cool concepts, and are used in mathematical theories. TREE(3) describes the number of nodes you can build in a tree of 3 different nodes, and graham's number describes huge numbers of dimensions and vertecies (I'm not a mathematician, I just watch numberphile, so don't believe what I'm saying do the research)
So you’re telling me there are more possible game states in chess than there is atoms in the known universe
Yes
Yuo
Yes
Yesir
Key word is “known”
Great video with a great visualisation!
Unfortunately, this video doesn't explain what Graham's Number is. Fortunately, I can try. I start with some simple calculations most people should understand. 3+3 = 6 3*3 = 3+(3+3) = 9 3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27 Now it becomes more complicated. The pattern above can be continued, but instead of the power notation one could also notate these numbers with upward arrows, but I will notate it with just "|". 3|3 = 3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27 3||3 = 3|(3|3) = 3^3^3 = 7,625,597,484,987. Here this number can be expressed as a "tower" of three exponentials. 3|||3 = 3||(3||3) = 3^3^...^3, a tower of 3||3 exponentials, on which the first calculation has to be done at the top of the tower. 3||||3 = 3|||(3|||3), a number so gigantic it will just be expressed as "G1". To reach Graham's number this way it will still take a while. So I will skip some steps, but note that each time, we still keep the formula 3|||... (n 'arrows') ...|||3 = 3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||(3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||3). Until now we have yet reached n = 4 this way. 3|||... (4 'arrows') ...|||3 = G1 3|||... (G1 'arrows') ...|||3 = G2 3|||... (G2 'arrows') ...|||3 = G3 ... 3|||... (G63 'arrows') ...|||3 = G64 = Graham's number
Very compact explanation! :)
Your genius
Ctrl + c ctrl + v Easy!
i don’t know what you said but it’s amazing
Well explained!
“No one can count upto billion” Senku: Am i joke to you?
Dude really counted to over 96 billion seconds
@@ohhimarx1471 count to 10³⁰³ (that's a centillion bty)
He had 3000 years no one can live that long
Conziltillion
@@raineanthonyvillafuerte1291 1 billion seconds is 30+ years dumbhead
Who needs to go to college and rack up student loans when you have wonderful videos like this to educate and enlighten! Love it!!!
something about the thumbnail: i calculated 2^1026 dollar thicknesses (2^1024 millimeters is much much less than graham's number) into light-years, and the amount of light-years was more than the amount of planck lengths in the universe.
Riddle: Gogol Me as an Intellectual: Ten Duotrigintillion
Me: One quintredecillion times a octononagintanongentillion
I thought a Googol was Ten Duotrigintillion?
@@wfow1448 sorry my mistake
@Ballyliffin Bros Not that I'm aware.
Uhhhhh how about a Beyond infinity googolplex Numwes X 999999999 It's beyond infinity its googol times bigger than infinity but its not the biggest number, a creator's number is bigger it would be almost infinite amount of seconds for you to write it all in one book but of course its inpossible because our sun will be a red giant and kill us all before that.
4:44 That zero placement disappoints me for some reason.
It’s because a googol is 10^100. 100 isn’t a multiple of 3, so a googol comes out to 10 duotrigintillion.
@@mrafabrizi I know that, it’s just that it’s positioned like this: 1,000,0 And not like this: 10,000
It's cause it's wrong the commas go after every 3 numbers from the beginning of the number (at the very right side)
@@JTS1576 Well, Your a Perfectionist
@@mrafabrizi a googol is far bigger than a duotrigintillion
"think of the biggest number you know" me: nondecilion, the dude: probably trillions of trillions me: smiles in what i learned from *cookie clicker*
"What's the largest number you can imagine?" Me: Idk like 10? "Trillions of Trillions!"
Chuck Norris counted to infinity, TWICE!
Pfft I did it thrice
@@shurik3nz346 chuck norris?
Lmao
And he did it backwards the second time.
@@TheAgamemnon911 lol I love that 😄
It really, REALLY bugs me that the "thousand-separator" commas are in the wrong places every time the googol is shown on screen.
I have a bigger number 1googolplexen it's 100googols to make Googleplexen
@@dumdum_plays a bigger number, the countable infinity
Do you have OCD or something?
@@dumdum_plays YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING IS INCREDIBLE
@@dumdum_plays also 100 googol doesnt do anything
me: *does graham's number + 1*
graham sequence of g(g(g(g(g(g(g...(64))))))... is bigger than graham number + 1, also if u just add +1 the opponent will too and it will never end
G65
It doesn’t work like that, Graham‘s number is the dimension it would take for the lines in a type of hypercube to plane.
@@wadewilson-xi1zs idk what that is but sure, it does work that way, graham's number + 1 will be greater than grahams number, I mean any finite number + 1 would be greater than that finite number.
@@cokxi 😂
Absolutely fantastic. An amazing visual companion
9:02 You're saying 10^94 books weigh as much as the Milky Way, when known atoms in the universe are 10^78. What am I missing here? They should weigh many magnitudes higher than all of the universe.
Yeah but there are objects in the Milky Way that are very small and very heavy such as neutron stars, and also we have at least 1 supermassive black hole which has a massive mass but relative to there mass don’t have atoms
@@saucysalamis9894 If you have more books than atoms in the universe, the books must weigh way more.
@@WalidFeghali well the books were being used as a comparison they didn’t mean it literally, I could say the milky green at weighs 10^10^1000 cockroaches, I’m not saying there is that many
There is 10^53 kg observable mass in the universe. All those books weigh more than 10^93 kg. I think they wrote it wrong in the video.
Because weight isn’t the same as volume
Imagine knowing this when u were a kids . Arguments who is more stupid would have interesting results. Like “ no ur stupid Grahams number times!” “ noooo ur stupid Grahams number plus 1!”
but we knew infinity That was our Ultimate superpower 😂
@@rishi91 That didn't work in my youth. My sister said "I always have 1 more."
Yeah I’m literally a kid I’m about to watch this video at 10 years old
I'm a kid, and seeing this brightens my day, knowing an adult doesn't know what a multillion is, yet I, a 10-yr-old, do... yeet
@@amberthecinderacee836 who said that a adult doesn't know bout multitrillion
Don't forget about everything between Tree(3, 4, 5) and Rayo's number. Hell, might as well bring up countable infinity while we're at it. The definition of Rayo's number is a variation on the definition: The smallest number bigger than any finite number named by an expression in the language of first-order set theory with a googol symbols or less.
"The biggest numbers in the world" Ah yes. I forgot that galaxies were on earth.
If you counted to 1 million, your lips wouldn’t touch until you said “1 million”
Oh God you're right...
Damn son
Wrong. Say one without touching your lips
@@guya1018 h-how are you pronouncing "one"??
Wrong.
Graham’s number in US dollars: you can’t defeat me The observable universe: I know, but he can *the US healthcare system
Grahams number in us dollars would actually be much much much bigger than the observable universe
Fr
after this final boss unlocked the real infinite universe
@@dylanmcadam8509 that’s exactly why the universe can’t beat graham number
I wish they made a mechanism in game like that 😅
yeah for Romper Room!!
Googol: You can't defeat me! Quadrillion: I know, but he can.. Googol Plex: *PERISH, YOU MORTAL*
😂
IMPOSSIBLE ITS NOT A JOJO REFRENCE
Graham's number: You are all powerless before me...!
Me, a vsauser: UNREACHABLE NUMBER
lawl exdee!1
Just to take into context how big Graham's number really is: (this is knots up arrow notation (just assume the lines in between the 3s are arrow ups)) 3|3= 27 3||3=7.6Trillion 3|||3= really big number 3||||3= G1 3||||...|[G1 no of arrows] 3 = G2 3||||...|[G2 no of arrows] 3= G3 . . . G64= Grahams number
well G65 is bigger than that.
Gstack
Tree3 laughs about that
@@Srontgorrth SCG(13) hehe
@@andrewzhang8512 Rayo's number: JAJAJAJA (laughing in Mexican)
That thumbnail definitely isn't to scale, since even if each dollar was a plank length long it would be larger than the universe lol
Our brains are so developed that we dont have to think of a googol outcomes in a chess match and we can guess what our opponent's next move will be
The opening graphic pic is so incredibly understated isnt funny. Grahams Number is so much larger than the size of our observable universe that if you could write each digit small enough to fit on an atom, you would run out of atoms in the universe to simply write the number out....by a lot. Like, the number that you did get by writing all 9s on every single atom in the universe wouldn't even come close to G1 and there's 64 layers in Grahams Number.
Yeah I think so cuz G1=3^7625597484987 when you put it in a calculator it just says infinity
@@sakshamsinghal5418 I'll put it to ya this way. Take 3^^^3. Not even G1, the step before it. 3, three arrows, 3.... is three to the power of 3... 7.6 TRILLION times! To count from 1 to 1 trillion if you were to say a number every second would take you 31,700 years. So, to count to 7.6 trillion at one number a second would take approximately 240,000 years or about as many years as man has been on planet Earth. Now.... imagine if it were possible to do the math of 3 to the power of 3 1 time, every second for 240,000 years. After just one day, the number would be so incredibly huge you wouldn't have room to write it down anywhere in your house. Now do that for a year. At that point you would likely run out of room in the universe as 3 to the power of itself compounds very quickly. Now, a century, then finally 240,000 years. 3^^^3, the number before G1 is so astronomically huge that your mind literally cannot comprehend it.
@@pleasuretokill wait I thought 3arrow3=27. 3arrowarrow3=19683 3arrowarrowarrow3=7625597484987 G1=3^7625597484987
@@sakshamsinghal5418 No. 3^3 is 27. 3^^3 is 7.6 Trillion. 3^^^3 is a tower of 3's stacked on itself 7.6 Trillion times. You would have to write 3 to the power of itself until you reached the sun. That's how high the tower of 3s would stack if you wrote a normal 3 like you would on a piece of paper. 3^^^^3 is 3^^^3, 7.6 Trillion times. The number that you get from 3^^^^3 is the number of arrows in G1. (sorry, I kept writing 3.7 trillion, I have no idea why, probably too many 3s...lol. It's 7.6 Trillion.)
@@sakshamsinghal5418 you mean 3↑↑4 but G1 is = 3↑↑↑↑3
largest number is how many years my dad has been gone to get milk
Just 15 years right
@@justsomeguywithamask1564 no its graham’s number x itself about grahm’s number times
Not mine
Cringe that joke is overused
@@SpaceIsAwesome0358 are you high on serious drugs
6:12 non of supermassive black hole have equal mass to galaxies, it doesn't even have 2% of galaxy mass.
Ummmm There's a black hole named TON 618 and has a mass of 66,000,000,000 suns. The third largest galaxy in our galactic local group (the triangulum galaxy) has a mass of 50,000,000,000 suns. The amount of matter needed to make that black hole is literally more than the amount needed to make a major galaxy.
2:16 Goku casually doing a BILLION pushups as his daily routine
Me: checks account balance......... ah man only $92 quadrillion left in my account, what am I to do with such peasant money 😂
smh i have 48 trillion left in my bank account
Bruh I only have 100 graham 😭😭😭
I only have, like, 170.
Noooooooo i have only 10^Graham number ^googol plex x 10 ^septrillion dollar
lol, i have only 25 sen, this is no joking, what should i do
imagine if 0 was never discovered. Indians must be proud.
What are u trying to say?
@@ray6936 Indians made 0
😀😊
@@helloworld7690 precisely
Here we go. What if division wasn’t discovered? Wouldn’t tribalism exist?
The numbers are created in latin, with some additions to it. Like Unus, Duo, Tres, quattuor, quinque. Which are Undecillion, Duo decillion, Tredecillion, Quatturodecillion, Quindecillion (or something like that) The "Decillion" also comes from latin which stands for 10. Quindecillion means 5 + 10 = 15. If you want the number of zeroes of that number (in american numbers) You multiply X (which is 15 in this scenario) by 3 and then you add another 3 which is 48. But in my country you would multiply X by 6. Which would mean that Quindecillion has 90 zeroes where i live.
Him: no one can think of the largest number Him later: this is the largest number Me then: does not under stand Me later: Types a 8 then turns it 90 degrees
I love how the commas are off and the last 0 is on it's own.
2:17 ''its unlikely anyone chould count to a billion,its almost 32 years me: *counts to a billion in less then 10 seconds* ''you understemate my power''
Same
1,2, imma skip a few, 1,000,000,000 boom that was easy.
ottffssentettffssent
Thats 1 to 20 super fast
Teach me your ways
I loved watching this video and pretending I knew exactly what was going on.
When you've been dead for a Googolplex years ...you haven't even started .
Fun fact : The largest number is how many time your crush ignore you
Jokes on you, I don't have a crush.
@@HangingDGrunt *shows hand*
It just feels that way. The largest number is when your parents are embarrassed to mention you to their friends.
Bruh...😭
that sucks
“10^94 books would weigh more than the Milky Way galaxy.” Umm, I should hope so, since there are only 10^80 atoms in the entire known universe. Did they forget that fact half way through the video? Smh.
Yop, they appearently forgot that tiny piece of information.
black holes ig
Since there is 95% dark matter and energy , so
@@sorry6726 so what? Doesnt change the fact that he stated there are 10^80 atoms in the (known) universe, yet 10^94 books would weigh as much as the whole galaxy. That doesnt add up. Unless you now a way to print a book on 10^-15 atoms
Thanks. I also hate it when YT videos do this.
here I am knowing numbers like a milliaquadrigenquattuorquinquagintillion
Relatable Usually come to Help people
I can't believe it is possible to count my pets
If Graham’s number is far bigger than all the Planck volume in the known universe, and since a dollar bill is much larger than a Planck volume, then Graham’s number in US dollars would be much, much more massive than what you showed in your thumbnail. Graham’s number dollars is much, much more than filling the whole universe with 100 dollar bills.
Clickbait. Ass video lol
Yeah that's actually what I was thinking about😂😂 Cool that we have the same thoughts!
If you put the amount of atoms in the observable universe as the amount of arrows between something like a googol and a googolplex, you would still be nowhere near graham's number.
@@bryantofsomething5964 wtf🤯🤯
The whole observable universe
5:10 Mission failed successfully
For extra speed, add a gerbil.
With Graham's number worth of US Dollars and I still wouldn't have enough money to buy all the DLC for Train Simulator
riddddddddddddddle: billion this where we get serious me: :O teacher: what is a billion? me: a place where we get serious teacher: correct
Expired 💯
Asian af
@@fsjal_scout7944 im not asian
Expired that’s not what I mean but ok
An endless billion times infinity/eternity how much is that number gonna be about &amount to???🐈🐈🐈🦆🦆🤷♀️🤷♀️🤷♀️😻🦆🌞🌞🌞🌞🐧🐧🐧
1:37 "1 THICC book"
It’s funny how you have to make massive numbers seem smaller than they actually are to make them seem big, like the thumbnail comparing Graham’s number to a galaxy. If you really compared Graham’s number of dollars next to a galaxy, grahams number would be incomprehensibly larger, pretty much making the galaxy look infinitely small, but that’s so impossible to imagine that it doesn’t really mean anything
2:16 " it's unlikely anyone could count to a billion" I Florida man: do you underestimate me?
Biggest number is the 60 secs when you do a plank and everyone knows that.
Shit you’re right
Ah, but what if you can only plank for 60 planck times?
Your grammar is astonishing
“What’s the largest comprehensible number” is a realistic line to say. Or ‘phrase’.
my guy just missed out sextillion
every wheat grain in a chess board except each square doubles the wheat grains.
Riddddle: "A Billion. Now this is where it gets serious." My teacher:"What type of serious activities Have you Kids Been doing Today?" Me:"*A Billion.*" Teacher: "Wh-" Me:"*A BILLION!*"
?
funny not detected.
I get it
Stop it, get some help.
@@kateofone everyone got it but it wasn't a funny joke.
Im gonna start counting to a googol boys, wish me luck🙏
Don't do it. But let the flat earthers count. At least they'll do something useful 😂😂🤣
@@trunzlerclement3227 you couldn't have said it better😂😂😭
@@JDog_Vlogs 😂😂😂
@@trunzlerclement3227 I love that idea LOL! 😀😀😅😅😄😄😃😃
You don't need luck, you need some extra mouth 😋
The HPD(n) function: HPD(n) = n^^^^(7^20) HPD(7) is so large that it would take millions of years to calculate. Imagine HPD(HPD(9000)) HPD stands for HyperProDigious. The TREE(n) function: TREE(TREE(TREE(TREE(g63)))) Generates a ridiculously large number that cannot be calculated before the sun bursts.
"No matter how many gears there are, if you spin the first gear once, the last gear will move aswell. no matter if it moves a googolth of a turn, it will always move"
wind is probaly moving more than that, in a year obviously
Me after watching this: “Google... googol... google. What’s google? Why does it sound weird now??
Nooo u did it to me tooo now
Same
Ah yes, semantic satiation. It sucks at the best of times.
He messed up, 1 followed by 100 zeros is googolplex
@@optidanprime8434 then what's a googol?
.. Somewhere between “ 8 toffees for 1 rupee” and “1 toffee for 8 rupees”, we grew up! Somewhere between “Ground mai aaja” (Come to the park) and “Online aaja”, (Come online) we grew up! Somewhere between “stealing chocolate of our sister” and “Buying chocolate for her children”, we grew up! Somewhere between “Just five more mins Maa” and “Pressing the snooze button”, we grew up! Somewhere between “Crying out loud just to get what we want” and “Holding our tears when we are broken inside”, we grew up! Somewhere between “I want to grow up” and “I want to be a child again”, we grew up! Somewhere between “Lets meet and plan” and “Lets plan and meet”, we grew up! Somewhere between "Being afraid of our parents" and "Praying for our parents" we finally grew up And as we grew up, we realize; How silently, our lives have changed.....
Ahhh,life
🙏
Uh...what?
Dude, that was deep! I literally felt that!
@@scratchpad7954 kzhead.info/sun/eKuim8yloYaJjYE/bejne.html
Mathematicians on their way to make an enormous number and give it their name even if it has no purpose at all
I think it's funny how he says de bruin hehe as a Dutch person it sounds hilarious 😅😅 anyway if you would count everything it be way more then whatever numbers you wanna make ))
6:01 So can you imagine just how big.. **Ad plays** Old Spice for men.
LMAOOOOO
I'm in mobile :D
How did you know
mine was nft
Can they do a scale of kyriakos grizzly vs the entire universe
He would die because of a black hole
I'll need one to count my money after I start selling my device that removes certain people from TV commercials
7:44 the way he said cool killed me 😂😂
"CŒL"
*8 year old me* :infinite plus one
So weird to hear this guy not scream “hey arnold”
Ikr
If you manually turned the last wheel All the way around in 1 second, would that then make the first wheel go faster then the speed of light? I know its not possible for it to go faster, and btw.. I feel like it would take an extreme amount of force to spin the last wheel?
The speed of light, or the speed of information is closely related to infinity. You need a literal infinite amount of energy, to bring the machine up to that speed. Witch btw. i guess, only takes around 10 decimals off of 1 Googol seconds; down to 10 to the power of 90 seconds. What you revering to, is imagined Information. A shadow for example "can" travel over the speed of light, but only because it is the absence of stuff (light casting the shadow). Imagine you casting a shadow on the moon with your hand. That shadow can now move over light speed with a simple hand gesture but your hand and the light around your shadow still cant. Anything out of mater simply cant do that. The machine would break or you would never have enough juice to reach over lightspeed RPM.
Yeah it would probably take a googolplex of torque to attempt to rotate the last gear, and the gears would probably shatter if you tried lol
How about instead of people saying “The gears would Just break” make stronger gears⚙️? Very simple solution then attach a fucking 9000hp engine to the Gears and spin that bastard as hard as possible it would still probably take a long time but its still faster than doing it yourself 😂🤷♂️ get something graphene for the gears and you’re all set
You're one of those people that breaks the Rubic's cube and puts it back together, right?!
Hmmm good Idea lol
I know somthing that u can describe for googol the amount of years until his dad comes back
Observable Universe means the universe we found We still don't have information about the whole universe not even close
7:40 it was on daily does of internet also
Poor Graham, everyone in his life is probably asking for money
Stephen Kerr Ya
Stephen Kerr I Agree With You
Yeah, good thing he died like three weeks ago.
BrutalBeast666 So Where Did You Hear It
@@whitrenee1 www.ams.org/news?news_id=6244
Imagine Graham's number smacks. I bet that is how parents used to discipline their kids back in 1803.
Just started looking into these massive numbers and TREE(3) is even larger than grahams number from what I’ve learned.
SSCG(3) > TREE(3)
@@Enter_channel_name what about tree(g(tree(g64)))
@@reizinhodojogo3956 thats still smaller than SSCG(3) and that's an understatement. Infact TREE(TREE(TREE(.............TREE(TREE(3))))) TREE(3) times is still zero compare to SSCG(3). SSCG and TREE(3) are not even in same realm of transfinite numbers.
@@ayushkumarjha9921 ok
@@ayushkumarjha9921 SSCG ? can you say what is this ?
Now I felt the importance of zeroes that I used to get in exams....😁😁those were precious !!!!
Lol
Grahams Number: Exsist Universe: You have so many zeros that I can't fit you in. Grahams Number: Begone, microscopic spec!
When he daid "You need 38 day to count a billuon" i started counting. 😂
Thought this was going to talk about larger numbers like tree(3), scg(3) and sscg(3)
Yes this video could go on for 10 h there are a video like that!
the creators of google can create a whole search engine full of information but can't spell googol lmao
They told a guy to write it, and thag guy wrote it wrong, not them
@ that guy is from their company though
@@KthW but it was not the creator