The No Cloning Theorem

2024 ж. 16 Мам.
2 472 880 Рет қаралды

Support MinutePhysics on Patreon: / minutephysics
Three Blue One Brown: / @3blue1brown
Why you can’t clone Schrödinger’s cat: this video presents the full proof of the “No Cloning” Theorem in Quantum Mechanics - without any fancy math! (stereotypical qubit has been replaced with Schrödinger’s cat).
The full proof relies on the linearity of quantum (aka unitary) transformations, and the tensor product of multiple systems, to show that perfect cloning is impossible (though teleportation is allowed)
Thanks to everyone who supports MinutePhysics on Patreon!
Link to Patreon supporters here: www.minutephysics.com/supporte...
REFERENCES:
The No-Cloning Theorem: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-clon...
MinutePhysics on Schrödinger’s Cat: • Schrödinger's Cat
Original No-Cloning Paper by Wootters and Zurech: www.nature.com/nature/journal/...
Original “Beyond No-Cloning” (ie, no-cloning workarounds) paper by Buzek & Hillery: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9607018
Optimal Quantum Cloning paper: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9801009
Optimal Quantum Cloning paper II: arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9910048
Quantum Cloning: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum\_cloning
The History of Schrödinger’s (& Einstein’s) Cat: nautil.us/issue/41/selection/h...
The Stability of Black Powder (from the Civil War!): www.jpyro.com/wp-content/uploa...
Proof by contradiction: www.personal.kent.edu/\~rmuhamma/Philosophy/Logic/ProofTheory/proof\_by\_contradictionExamples.htm
MinutePhysics is on Google+ - bit.ly/qzEwc6
And facebook - / minutephysics
And twitter - @minutephysics
Minute Physics provides an energetic and entertaining view of old and new problems in physics -- all in a minute!
Created by Henry Reich
Music by Nathaniel Schroeder

Пікірлер
  • Hello everyone! I am back from a 2+year comment hiatus and excited to say hi! (my account wasn't linked with any google+ account, so I couldn't comment on KZhead from the MinutePhysics account for the last 2-3 years; google finally gave up on google+ enough that now I can comment on KZhead again!!)

    @MinutePhysics@MinutePhysics7 жыл бұрын
    • goood!! btw will you continue uploading videos? PD: your channel is awesome :)

      @Eduardo-bq6is@Eduardo-bq6is7 жыл бұрын
    • WOOO coool !

      @yassir-5605@yassir-56057 жыл бұрын
    • welcome back!

      @thesasselife8214@thesasselife82147 жыл бұрын
    • Hello Mr. Min-phys, I cant remember your name but trust me its a warm welcome none the less.

      @Vatsyayana87@Vatsyayana877 жыл бұрын
    • i believe his name is Henry.

      @thesasselife8214@thesasselife82147 жыл бұрын
  • Heisenberg was stopped by the police. The officer asked "Do you know how fast you were going?" Heisenberg responds "No, but I knew EXACTLY where I was."

    @spartan8705@spartan87057 жыл бұрын
    • Iron_Spartan-137 The officer tells him that he was driving at 90 mph. Heisenberg responds angrily:"oh great! Now I'm lost!"

      @AbdelW460@AbdelW4607 жыл бұрын
    • Great!

      @spartan8705@spartan87057 жыл бұрын
    • you guys made my day

      @deltablues24@deltablues247 жыл бұрын
    • The cop searches the car because of the odd behavior. The checks the trunk and shouts "You guys know there is a dead cat back here?" Schrodinger shouted from the back seat, "THERE IS NOW JERK"

      @TKDWILSON@TKDWILSON7 жыл бұрын
    • +

      @hotdrippyglass@hotdrippyglass7 жыл бұрын
  • (Ten) MinutePhysics

    @ItsSansom@ItsSansom7 жыл бұрын
    • Got to get that ad revenue.

      @TheSmackan@TheSmackan7 жыл бұрын
    • I'd hate to see this explained in 1 minute

      @bmpianovids@bmpianovids7 жыл бұрын
    • thought so too, but awesome vid!!

      @magixo_@magixo_7 жыл бұрын
    • BM Piano Yeah most of the stuff on this channel is impossible to explain in a minute. Just find it funny that the whole idea of the channel has gone out the window

      @ItsSansom@ItsSansom7 жыл бұрын
    • pleb - ist i mean if he wanted ad revenue he wouldve split the video into 5 separate 2 minute videos

      @nabeelsherazi8860@nabeelsherazi88607 жыл бұрын
  • My cloning machine searches the universe for a perfect clone, and teleports it to the user.

    @DenisLoubet@DenisLoubet4 жыл бұрын
    • Just because it doesn't remain a perfect clone doesn't mean it never was

      @eliwalker1058@eliwalker10584 жыл бұрын
    • @@Satheo05 clone a vase and drop one... Are they no longer clones?

      @eliwalker1058@eliwalker10584 жыл бұрын
    • So things aren't clones unless they occupy the same space?

      @eliwalker1058@eliwalker10584 жыл бұрын
    • HowStupidlyLongCanThisNameThingAllowMeToGo??? ???? Even objects change over time. The vase might lose some particles or get dustier than the other.

      @calculuswalulu7560@calculuswalulu75604 жыл бұрын
    • @@Satheo05 It could still lose some particles and be slightly different. Just because it is no longer a perfect copy it doesn't mean it never was.

      @MaoDev@MaoDev4 жыл бұрын
  • Why are you putting a box of unstable gunpowder that may or may not explode at any moment through a cloning machine?

    @dkpsyhog@dkpsyhog6 жыл бұрын
    • For science

      @idot3331@idot33316 жыл бұрын
    • Yes

      @johnvena72@johnvena726 жыл бұрын
    • A lot of things are in superpositions like the gunpowder

      @ianmann5040@ianmann50406 жыл бұрын
    • Because you really don’t care about your cloning machine, or you just got a new one so you’re trying to blow it up with two gunpowder explosions at once right after it cloned the original exploding gunpowder.

      @gorisenke@gorisenke6 жыл бұрын
    • Makes me think if there were a cloning machine that everyone can afford, there will be youtubers doing video about it. "Cloning a hot metal knife cutting through spacetime" With shitty editing thumbnail and some arrows.

      @neutronstar6739@neutronstar67396 жыл бұрын
  • i once interfered with myself and left a nice pattern on the wall

    @Joeobrown1@Joeobrown17 жыл бұрын
    • Lol....extremely funny

      @vipuldr1@vipuldr17 жыл бұрын
    • xD

      @hdef6602@hdef66027 жыл бұрын
    • good one

      @25NN25@25NN257 жыл бұрын
    • i was reading the comments while listening to the video right when he said this line, i came across this. creepy.

      @babatulani6361@babatulani63617 жыл бұрын
    • Seminal art? I guess if frescoes are a thing so can that be a thing too.

      @chromemaster3519@chromemaster35197 жыл бұрын
  • people that are interested in what you have to say most likely have an attention span that is

    @ianirizarry30@ianirizarry307 жыл бұрын
    • You mean >60s?

      @Kaepsele337@Kaepsele3377 жыл бұрын
    • "people lost interest in anything longer than 10 seconds unless it's boxing match"

      @DarthBiomech@DarthBiomech7 жыл бұрын
    • I watch these videos just to be reminded that I am dumb as hell and have no clue what he is talking about. But the topics are interesting!

      @vilestine@vilestine7 жыл бұрын
    • real steel?

      @zef3k@zef3k7 жыл бұрын
    • Vilestine try crash course physics! Everyone deserves their universe's rule book

      @ofthehunt4243@ofthehunt42437 жыл бұрын
  • Object a = new Object(); Object b = a.clone(); Ha!!

    @coronelkittycannon@coronelkittycannon4 жыл бұрын
    • or... just.. object b = a;

      @nyxa8734@nyxa87344 жыл бұрын
    • @@nyxa8734 Depending on the language, this (b=a) would make b only a reference to a, whereas b=a.clone() creates a new object.

      4 жыл бұрын
    • Object a; Object b; memcpy(&b, &a, sizeof(Object));

      @sirsulo9102@sirsulo91024 жыл бұрын
    • Is it a deep clone?

      @aaronseet2738@aaronseet27384 жыл бұрын
    • // Compile in code chef, tutorialspoint or gcc // Compilar con/Compile with: gcc -Wall -std=c99 -o clone clone.c #include #define FALSE 0 #define TRUE 1 typedef struct point { int x,y,active; } Point; int main() { Point one = {8,16,TRUE}; Point two = one; Point *ptr = &one; //Change [&one] to [&two] printf("Point one: x: %d y: %d active: %d Point two: x: %d y: %d active: %d ",one.x,one.y,one.active,two.x,two.y,two.active); if (&one == &two) puts("one and two are equal"); else puts("one and two are not equal"); //Always not equal if (&one == ptr) puts("one and ptr are equal"); else puts("one and ptr are not equal"); //Depends on ptr address if (&two == ptr) puts("two and ptr are equal"); else puts("two and ptr are not equal"); //Depends on ptr address printf("Point one address: %p Point two address:%p ",&one,&two); return 0; } //GCC Approved this

      @MonyoDS@MonyoDS4 жыл бұрын
  • ngl fam, totally read "no clothing theorem"

    @inventor4279@inventor42793 жыл бұрын
    • bruh

      @datblue1104@datblue11043 жыл бұрын
    • Hu... me too You actually made me realise it wasn't

      @valovanonym@valovanonym3 жыл бұрын
    • ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

      @highestalmond7558@highestalmond75583 жыл бұрын
    • LOL SAME

      @pinkdoor2450@pinkdoor24503 жыл бұрын
    • click bait!!!!! ahahahahahahaha

      @aldob5681@aldob56813 жыл бұрын
  • Very mixed feelings in re to format length. Longer and more in depth is great. But I would hate to lose the shorter format that really made your brand. They both serve a purpose. Two channels is probably not a good solution, especially from a business perspective. Perhaps clearly mark each format, perhaps not just by name, (ten minute physics works), but by some distinctive visual clue. This works on other channels that have multiple formats. People can readily pick out the series they want. You can keep separate playlists for those checking out your back catalogue.

    @thomasr.jackson2940@thomasr.jackson29407 жыл бұрын
    • Great idea. Thumb up so he can read this

      @PennyHerbst@PennyHerbst7 жыл бұрын
    • +

      @gracegrass4462@gracegrass44627 жыл бұрын
    • Or just post two videos. One cool style and one to somewhat satisfy KZhead and be longer

      @irok1@irok17 жыл бұрын
    • Or you could just look at the length of the video to determine if it is 1 min or 10. not trying to be rude but a 'distinctive visual clue' just seems a bit unnecessarily difficult and pointless

      @CackleCake@CackleCake7 жыл бұрын
    • Thomas R. Jackson the way KZhead is set up, they force creators to have longer videos to stay relevant. It's out of the creators hands. They have to adapt to the situation is around them.

      @jibbyjackjoe@jibbyjackjoe7 жыл бұрын
  • I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it. Edit: Why did I think this was funny? Its legit a facebook level joke

    @QuarkGamingLLC@QuarkGamingLLC7 жыл бұрын
    • ah dam i was gonna copy it

      @Fanta69420@Fanta694207 жыл бұрын
    • I see what you did there!

      @zarifsafwanhoque4127@zarifsafwanhoque41277 жыл бұрын
    • I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.

      @gracegrass4462@gracegrass44627 жыл бұрын
    • I was going to make a. .. doh!

      @AvailableUsernameTed@AvailableUsernameTed7 жыл бұрын
    • Cloning a joke is theoretically impossible. You see, jokes have several factors other than the joke itself that make it funny. If I were to just copy and paste your joke, the timing would be different, author would be different, and the amount of likes would probably be different too. You won't have to worry about someone cloning your joke, only re-posting it.

      @luigi1fan1@luigi1fan17 жыл бұрын
  • 0:29 "There are a few too many atoms of carbon-14 in the new canvas." I loved that one! 😂

    @danij5055@danij50554 жыл бұрын
  • Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V

    @oneautumnleaf5270@oneautumnleaf52705 жыл бұрын
    • Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V Noobs all you need to do is Ctrl + C and Ctrl + V

      @cypher1o1@cypher1o15 жыл бұрын
    • Control or how it is prounced in german: *_Steuerung_*

      @brokkrep@brokkrep5 жыл бұрын
    • copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste copypaste

      @robertodelier9999@robertodelier99995 жыл бұрын
    • IQ 3,000 IQ 3,000 IQ 3,000

      @alexanderharrison7421@alexanderharrison74215 жыл бұрын
    • Or an old pre windows method that still works on everything, Shift delete, Shift insert

      @ikannunaplays@ikannunaplays5 жыл бұрын
  • I wouldn't mind a hourphysics video!

    @rkiwtir1146@rkiwtir11467 жыл бұрын
    • Ritwik Sharma apparently people would...

      @karthikk1172@karthikk11727 жыл бұрын
    • that is such a mean/racist comment

      @nathanlim5421@nathanlim54217 жыл бұрын
    • Go back to your hick country your racist hillbilly pleb

      @essentialdang@essentialdang7 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, hillbilly land

      @essentialdang@essentialdang7 жыл бұрын
    • I don't see any rascism.

      @matthewkennedy1329@matthewkennedy13297 жыл бұрын
  • I love this video style! It makes things so much more intuitive. I hope you continue uploading such videos

    @varunv5237@varunv52374 жыл бұрын
  • You draw well ! And so your explainations are so cool and understandable 👌🏼 Thank you !

    @Brunograffer@Brunograffer5 жыл бұрын
  • 1:22 "The universe is a party pooper, and perfect cloning is impossible." So, the universe says: No cloning around!

    @Master_Therion@Master_Therion7 жыл бұрын
    • *groan*

      @SD-mc2ef@SD-mc2ef7 жыл бұрын
    • Master Therion *Laugh Track Plays*

      @MapleyNexus@MapleyNexus7 жыл бұрын
    • Perfect reaction! 10/10! xD

      @Doktor_Vem@Doktor_Vem7 жыл бұрын
    • Nice Antivist logo!

      @pedrogoncalves9882@pedrogoncalves98827 жыл бұрын
    • Gamerz The Box LOL

      @MisterBrrown@MisterBrrown7 жыл бұрын
  • I am in a superposition of both liking these videos and really liking these videos.

    @dylangibson2943@dylangibson29437 жыл бұрын
    • I'm in a super position of not writing this comment and writing this co- Dang it, you just had to observe me, not I'm not cool. ):

      @huhneat1076@huhneat10766 жыл бұрын
    • me neither :v

      @robertodelier9999@robertodelier99995 жыл бұрын
    • If the phase of the wavefunctions are offsef by 1 Pi rad, their sum is cancelled out by destructive interference. So you no longer like the videos. Unless both WFs are in the same (or similar) phase

      @Rudxain@Rudxain2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Rudxain wut?

      @sineowl443@sineowl4432 жыл бұрын
  • Well there's goes my only chance I get to a friend

    @funky555@funky5555 жыл бұрын
    • FunkyPlayz makes me sad :(

      @theman389@theman3894 жыл бұрын
    • bold of you to assume that you'd hang out with you.

      @himagnamukherjee9382@himagnamukherjee93823 жыл бұрын
    • *there

      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n@BariumCobaltNitrog3n3 жыл бұрын
    • Damn dude... you good

      @simoneangeliquemaloney3990@simoneangeliquemaloney39903 жыл бұрын
    • @@simoneangeliquemaloney3990 naw

      @funky555@funky5553 жыл бұрын
  • Hi, something seems off about the proof in the video - at the start you said that there are 3 things needed for cloning: 1) the original object (O) 2) the materials that comprise the object (M) 3) cloning process (C) But the proof only considers O and C (as a function of O), while it should be O, M and C (as a function of O and M). Cloning shouldn't be C(O)=OxO but C(OxM)=OxO. If O exists in superposition as O1+O2 then cloning would be C((O1+O2)xM)=(O1+O2)x(O1+O2). We then need to examine the cloning process for O1 and O2, however the materials needed for cloning O1, O2 and O might be different. Let's say M1 is the materials for cloning O1 and M2 is the materials for cloning O2, so the materials needed for cloning O=O1+O2 are M=M1+M2. C(O1xM1)=O1xO1,C(O2xM2)=O2xO2 O1xO1+O2xO2+O1xO2+O2xO1=(O1+O2)x(O1+O2)=OxO=C(OxM)=C((O1+O2)x(M1+M2))=C(O1xM1)+C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1)+C(O2xM2)=O1xO1+O2xO2+C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1) So the process could exist so long as O1xO2+O2xO1=C(O1xM2)+C(O2xM1). Consider for example the trivial solution where M=O and cloning is an empty action. PS - great videos, learned a lot from them.

    @justinanderson2132@justinanderson21324 жыл бұрын
    • He didn't take C(O)....but took the hypothetical end product as a function of O

      @itsnotme7868@itsnotme78684 жыл бұрын
    • @@itsnotme7868 I'm not sure I understand you mate. If C is the cloning process as a function of O, then the end product would be C(O)=OxO. And regardless as I've stated in my previous comment I think the proof is lacking M to truly prove anything meaningful. Without M all that is proven is that there is no process that can take an object O and turn it into 2 of the same object OxO - which I would think is already covered by conservation of matter.

      @justinanderson2132@justinanderson21324 жыл бұрын
    • @Danamo999 Sorry, I'm a year out of context so I might be missing something obvious. "C(O1xM2) is only defined if M2 is the materials to clone O1" - why would that be the case? The only thing we know about the process C is that given an object O/O1/O2 and the materials needed to reproduce it M/M1/M2, the process results in 2 objects O/O1/O2 and under these conditions C would be cloning. We know nothing about what process C does given an object O1 and the materials M2. Imagine a trivial example where C is an empty action - it does absolutely nothing. And the materials M to reproduce an object O are the object itself, M=O. Let's say O is a cat, O1 is a dead cat and O2 is a living cat, O=O1+O2. The materials to reproduce a cat O is another cat exactly like it M=O. The materials to reproduce a dead cat is another dead cat just like it M1=O1, the materials to reproduce a living cat is a living cat just like it M2=O2. You put a dead cat O1 in a box together with another dead cat M1=O1, then open the box and have 2 dead cats O1. You've successfully (though trivially) cloned a dead cat. You put a dead cat O1 in a box together with a living cat M2=O2/=O1, then open the box and find a living cat O2 and a dead cat O1. Is the process C of doing nothing to the objects inside perfectly defined? Yes. Does it successfully clone an object given the right materials? Yes. Must the materials M1 for producing a dead cat O1 be the same as the materials M2 for producing a living cat O2? No. Will the process successfully clone an object given the wrong materials? No. But then again it's not supposed to.

      @justinanderson2132@justinanderson21323 жыл бұрын
    • math class: 2+2 you close your eyes math class:

      @prof.reuniclus21@prof.reuniclus21 Жыл бұрын
    • I know I am 3 years late but for cloning to be possible the cloning transformation should distribute. So, C((O1+O2)×M) = C(O1×M + O2×M) must be equal to C(O1×M) + C(O2×M) for cloning to be possible. But since (O1+O2)×(O1+O2) is not equal to O1×O1+O2×O2, cloning shouldn't be possible right?

      @febinthomas1133@febinthomas1133 Жыл бұрын
  • The long format is really good. CGP Grey +

    @Krysmand@Krysmand7 жыл бұрын
    • krysman I noticed too! There should be a CGP Grey emoji

      @Sam-oz8pn@Sam-oz8pn7 жыл бұрын
  • I liked the CGP Grey reference.

    @CarlosRios1@CarlosRios17 жыл бұрын
    • glad i am not the only one to notice :)

      @Enden31@Enden317 жыл бұрын
    • 7:34 Is that about some particular comment of Grey's or just about Grey in general?

      @zacchon@zacchon7 жыл бұрын
    • It's a recurring theme in Grey and Brady Haran's Podcast, Hello Internet.

      @DJZiiWi@DJZiiWi7 жыл бұрын
  • Extremely clear and positive! Very good explanation of concepts with very simple mathematical derivations. It leaves several points worth discussing further, but that might be a debate for another day. Thanks a lot for this video and for your channel!

    @agustinp.montero1434@agustinp.montero14346 жыл бұрын
  • for some reason I readed 'the no cleaning' theorem and came here expecting a excuse to give to my mom

    @quantumbracket6995@quantumbracket69954 жыл бұрын
    • quantum bracket you sound a little to young to grasp the concept of quantum physics,

      @smashedvlogs@smashedvlogs4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Satheo05 Yes indeed, how old? The answer is it doesn't matter as long as you can understand it.

      @MaoDev@MaoDev4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Satheo05 Yeah, I know. I answered for him.

      @MaoDev@MaoDev4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Satheo05 lol, fine

      @MaoDev@MaoDev4 жыл бұрын
    • Lol

      @Gositi@Gositi4 жыл бұрын
  • A 10 minute video! What is this? Christmas?

    @TheLordHighNoob@TheLordHighNoob7 жыл бұрын
    • *Looks at Calender* *Feels dumb*

      @TheLordHighNoob@TheLordHighNoob7 жыл бұрын
    • *Looks at the length* It's just over 10 minutes so they make more money.

      @ruinenlust_@ruinenlust_7 жыл бұрын
    • They haven't put any mid roll adds though, so they aren't actually making more money

      @user-dx4rx3bt2l@user-dx4rx3bt2l7 жыл бұрын
    • I LOVE THE SHERLOCK REFERENCE. YOU ARE BECOME THE NEW EMPEROR OF TUMBLR. ALL HAIL EMMA L!

      @TheLordHighNoob@TheLordHighNoob7 жыл бұрын
    • 10 minutes that I can only understand 10 seconds

      @BULLSHXTYT@BULLSHXTYT7 жыл бұрын
  • My brain just exploded plus not exploded = exploded² + not exploded² = A²+2AB+B²

    @mohdasyraf999@mohdasyraf9997 жыл бұрын
    • Mohd Asyraf or (A+B)^2

      @zinns@zinns7 жыл бұрын
    • Agreed.

      @TrackMastersCupSeries@TrackMastersCupSeries7 жыл бұрын
    • Mohd Asyraf I don't know why I'm pretending to understand quantum mechanics or physics or whatever

      @theenbgender@theenbgender6 жыл бұрын
    • Haha awesome too awesome answer

      @thankyouand3260@thankyouand32606 жыл бұрын
    • actually it should be (exploded +not exploded)^2=A^2+2AB+B^2 dumb ass learn some algebra

      @sahildoshi5247@sahildoshi52476 жыл бұрын
  • This video is brilliant! perfect illustrations to get insights on eigenvalues and eiegenstates in ket notation 👌 Longer videos are the way to go!!!

    @fiseticamente@fiseticamente5 жыл бұрын
  • A great video, while keeping it simple, staying informative. Great job man! I really enjoyed it. Please consider more quantum mechanics based videos. Thank you

    @alihasanzadeh2692@alihasanzadeh26926 жыл бұрын
    • "simple" :)

      @freblox812@freblox812 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@freblox812it is simple lol

      @MC-mx1mt@MC-mx1mt8 ай бұрын
  • 10 minutes of Minute Physics, hell yeah!

    @dov36Kaizo@dov36Kaizo7 жыл бұрын
  • So it IS feasibly possible for two things in the universe to be exactly the same, just not for us to make exact copies of something that there's only one of in existence. This brings to light an interesting concept concerning consciousness. Suppose that the universe is spatially infinite. Also, suppose that the number of types of particles that exist in the universe is finite. On top of that, assume that there's only a certain number of ways to arrange those particles that complies with known physical law, and that those particles can only exist in a finite number of states. As such, if space is infinite, that would mean that, if you go far enough in any direction, you'll eventually run across an exact copy of the place you just left. So, if you left earth, then eventually you'd run across an exact replica of earth. Down to the people on it. Down to the arrangement of the neurons in those peoples' brains. Down to the properties of the sodium and potassium ions in those brains. And not only would there be one exact copy. If space were infinite, there would be an infinite number of exact copies. Now, as far as we know of today, there is no mystical aspect of consciousness that determines its properties. You are you simply because your brain is arranged a certain way, and your neurons are firing in a particular pattern that is unique to you. But here's the catch - if there were to exist an exact copy of you, down to the position of the neurons and the arrangement of the neural activity, then which "you" would you be? Which head would you reside in? What would differentiate your mind from the mind of the other you? Assuming that they truly were an exact copy, then nothing at all would differentiate the two of you. Now, if you two were to be in the same location and interacting with each other, then it could be determined which "you" was you, as the very act of interacting would break the symmetry. The other "you" would respond to your gestures, therefore altering his neural state in a way that's unique from yours. But, if the two of you were to forever remain isolated in your little bubbles, then you could conceivably reside in both heads at once. And, if there's an infinite number of "you's" out there, then you'd reside in all of their heads at once. And, since they'd all be exact copies, then they'd all be experiencing and doing the same thing simultaneously. So there wouldn't be any way for you to differentiate between the copies. In short, your mind could be simultaneously existing in an infinite number of locations at once. You simply don't know because each location is an exact copy of the other, so you get the exact same sensory input and experience the exact same responses to that input at every location. What's more, let's assume that every copy of you suddenly became curious and said "I want to find this supposed replica-world." Afterwards, they all set out in their collective high-tech spacecraft in a random direction, intent on traveling until they run across the replica-earth. Now, let's say that after an arbitrarily long amount of time (assuming that you could somehow do it before the universe suffered heat death) you finally run across this replica world. Here's the kicker. The "you" of this world would've left long ago, at the exact moment YOU decided to leave, in search of this mysterious "replica-world" he thought of. That means that, from the perspective of the people that inhabit that world, "you" set off in one direction, bound for a replica-world, but instead simply returned to your own world, coming from the opposite direction. From their perspective, you simply would've circled the entire universe, then come back around. And the crazy thing is that, from your perspective, this would be a perfectly reasonable explanation as well, as you'd never run in to any copy of you, and there would be no way of differentiating the earth you find from the earth you left behind. Similarly, a copy of you would show up on the earth you left, which the people on that world would assume was you after having circled the entire universe. So is there really any difference between a universe with an infinite number of "you"s and "earth"s, and a universe that curves in on itself?

    @hxhxhgfd@hxhxhgfd7 жыл бұрын
    • Ethan d Interesting to read :) seriously, but the assumption that "space is infinite" is not correct. so there is no replica of earth to be found, because the universe is really TINY! to have such exact replica !!

      @ZaidAlOmari@ZaidAlOmari7 жыл бұрын
    • Zaid Al-Omari He did say "suppose"

      @raffaeldavila1305@raffaeldavila13057 жыл бұрын
    • Raffael Davila excuse me i am not native english speaker, I thought "suppose" means that he is trying to use the logical argument "Prove by Contradiction". so i thought he tried to make an assumption then prove its true.

      @ZaidAlOmari@ZaidAlOmari7 жыл бұрын
    • Quantum Woo yes thats why I disagreed.

      @ZaidAlOmari@ZaidAlOmari7 жыл бұрын
    • holy shit that was really interesting to read... kind of mind-bending

      @thejedimaster32@thejedimaster327 жыл бұрын
  • OMG ! I just loved how creatively you explained one of the most confusing things ever and made it look so look!! looking forward for more such videos

    @user-cc8dw9tf9z@user-cc8dw9tf9z5 ай бұрын
  • I really appreciate the way of explanation on this channel. Got to learn a lot from here.. thanks!

    @malvikachaudhary@malvikachaudhary3 жыл бұрын
  • Really love this more in depth video :)

    @Vicioussama@Vicioussama7 жыл бұрын
    • The God Emperor same here!

      @giomjava@giomjava7 жыл бұрын
  • 10minutesphysics*

    @FishCantRoll@FishCantRoll7 жыл бұрын
    • It's an adjective, not a noun. minute (adjective) [mahy-noot, -nyoot, mi-] 1. extremely small, as in size, amount, extent, or degree: minute differences. 2. of minor importance; insignificant; trifling. 3. attentive to or concerned with even the smallest details: a minute examination.

      @MuradBeybalaev@MuradBeybalaev6 жыл бұрын
    • Murad Beybalaev It *is also a noun minute ˈmɪnɪt noun noun: minute; plural noun: minutes; noun: arc minute; plural noun: arc minutes; noun: minute of arc; plural noun: minutes of arc 1. a period of time equal to sixty seconds or a sixtieth of an hour. "we waited for twenty minutes" the distance covered in a minute by someone driving or walking. "the hotel is situated just ten minutes from the centre of the resort" informal a very short time. "come and sit down for a minute" synonyms: moment, short time, little while, second, bit, instant; More informalsec, nanosecond, jiffy, jiff; informaltick, mo, two ticks "it'll only take a minute" a point in time. "she was laughing one minute and crying the next" synonyms: point in time, point, moment, instant, time, juncture, stage "at that minute, Tony walked in" 2. a sixtieth of a degree of angular measurement (symbol: ʹ). "Delta Lyrae is a double star with a separation of over 10 minutes of arc" Dipshit (sorry in advance if it was a joke)

      @captaincygni2162@captaincygni21626 жыл бұрын
    • or 10x the minutephysics.

      @caharkness@caharkness6 жыл бұрын
    • Captain Cygni I believe he was referring to the context in which it was used, not the word as a whole. Yes, it is a noun, but the minute used in the channel name is not a noun. As in, it’s not used as a noun.

      @gabep3132@gabep31326 жыл бұрын
    • Conveniently just past the 10min advert money split too. Which means he artificially lengthened the video to get more money.

      @TT-zi5st@TT-zi5st5 жыл бұрын
  • Psh, you just need a Heisenberg compensator

    @jamchiroptera4258@jamchiroptera42586 жыл бұрын
    • Silly Star Trek

      @unspeci8852@unspeci88526 жыл бұрын
    • If only it where that easy

      @danielaguilarlopez7254@danielaguilarlopez72544 жыл бұрын
  • I liked this video a lot the ad is placed right and it was worth to put my time watching it. great job I hope the up coming videos are as great as this one did

    @icebluscorpion@icebluscorpion3 жыл бұрын
  • Love the longer videos!

    @trobinson9342@trobinson93427 жыл бұрын
    • I Agree, but longer videos means less frequent videos because of the time and effort but into them, so maybe some shorter videos wrinkled in with the longer ones?

      @ampjam@ampjam7 жыл бұрын
  • I've only studied physics through highschool but i've always been interested in the whole magic of it and this channel is the only place i can get my share of mind blowing physics pieces that are actually fun. Keep up the great work. I absolutely love the videos ❤ And it didn't feel longer at all.

    @d0lllz477@d0lllz4777 жыл бұрын
  • Neat! I re-found your channel after rewatching the video you did with Hank Green, so youtube started suggesting you again. I loved the fact that you brought up (star trek!! :D) teleporters, because that's exactly where my brain was when I was watching the rest of the video.

    @Locane256@Locane2564 жыл бұрын
  • This is the best video I have seen ever!!!!!! All the conepts are made clear along with the basics needed to understand that concept. Please make more !!!!!

    @geminigoal3085@geminigoal3085 Жыл бұрын
  • longer videos = more money for u + more time to learn(for us viewers)so... everybody wins!

    @endsu@endsu7 жыл бұрын
    • No, not really... This video had no ad put by google therefore he made no money out of it. Of course, there are people who donate and he himself can promote some products, but the length of the video is not a factor for making more money.

      @MaoDev@MaoDev4 жыл бұрын
    • @@MaoDev and the sad thing about youtubr comments is nobody ever replies. Hell he probably wont even see this comment...will you see this comment? The world will never know. I wish KZhead comments were more like reddit where you actually get replies decently fast

      @nebula3576@nebula35764 жыл бұрын
    • No, fuck this channel it fucking sux. He never explains anything well

      @lofianorak8013@lofianorak80134 жыл бұрын
    • @@lofianorak8013 He explained pretty well in this video, though.

      @kanjakan@kanjakan3 жыл бұрын
  • This is one of my favourite videos you've done!! A ton of clear and logical explanation that is also relatable. I'm so up for more like this. Thanks!!

    @jamesweaver6741@jamesweaver67417 жыл бұрын
  • Daim you explain such complex topic so easy to follow and get the gist of

    @sinanaltinova4201@sinanaltinova42016 жыл бұрын
  • Am I the only one who likes to pretend that I understand what these kinds of video are really about?

    @011azr@011azr7 жыл бұрын
    • jkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk i laughed

      @pedrocorrea9048@pedrocorrea90487 жыл бұрын
    • i don't pretend you dingler tingler

      @brian_cream@brian_cream7 жыл бұрын
    • nope.

      @boltstrikes429@boltstrikes4297 жыл бұрын
    • simply watching it doesn't work because most of these terms and examples are unknown to me so before I understand this I'dd have to research a lot more basic stuff..

      @Darqoni@Darqoni7 жыл бұрын
    • even if you don't exactly know what those terms mean you can get a pretty good idea of what they represent in this context. But you have a point it took me a while to completely understand this video but that's probably because i'm 14 and i had no clue about quantum mechanics

      @brian_cream@brian_cream7 жыл бұрын
  • Likely my favorite MinutePhysics video so far. It's in depth enough for me to feel that I fully grasp the topic, but not swallowing over half an hour of my time. Great work!

    @mancheaseskrelpher8419@mancheaseskrelpher84197 жыл бұрын
  • Great content - really inspiring me to learn more about science, as well as inspiring ideas for my sci-fi fiction

    @Weird_Quests@Weird_Quests6 жыл бұрын
  • "more perfecter" -Henry Reich

    @shadowfaceanimated3641@shadowfaceanimated36415 жыл бұрын
  • "I'm trying a new format" a.k.a. KZhead formula forcing content creators to make a video 10 minutes long.

    @Schaibs11@Schaibs117 жыл бұрын
  • and even if this cloning was possible, one second later, both the clone and the original would be exposed to different stimuli, this would make them diverge.

    @derstreber2@derstreber27 жыл бұрын
  • Love the longer format!

    @drunemeton@drunemeton Жыл бұрын
  • It was a great video, long format also good! Keep it up :)

    @hisoka44444444@hisoka444444444 жыл бұрын
  • I really enjoy the longer format videos. Been watching for years. You can get in way more depth and i don't feel like it takes away what you were originally trying to do with the channel. Like you said, Minute Physics was meant to signify a video on the magnitude from 1 to 10 minutes

    @TrustyPumpkin@TrustyPumpkin7 жыл бұрын
  • I like the longer format. Please do more of them.

    @Merlin5007@Merlin50077 жыл бұрын
  • Great Video! The explanation was clear and in depth!

    @leoyang1.618@leoyang1.6184 жыл бұрын
  • your KZhead channel is very good i can understand everything and everything is accurately true

    @sheetalkhandelwal8755@sheetalkhandelwal87555 жыл бұрын
  • Soo, if a teleporter breaks my atoms down and reassembles me it actually will still be my own conscious self on the destination, and not just a clone with the exact same personality?

    @glacier4286@glacier42867 жыл бұрын
    • Pincsi01 Pfft, wow, you cut me deep.

      @glacier4286@glacier42867 жыл бұрын
    • Dual Wield We still don't know if consciousness is purely the result of the matter that makes us up and it's unique arrangement. It could be something inconceivable as nature has had 4.5 billion years to shape a being as advanced as us. We, as a bunch of atoms, understand that we are atoms and can grasp amazing concepts like our place and purpose in the universe. Then again, what is consciousness and does it really exist. How can you know if you have the awareness that you are having your own thoughts and are not just programmed or destined based on your biochemistry to do what you do? These are perplexing questions I hope we can shed some light on in the coming century, especially with the arrival of artificial intelligence that pass the Turing Test with flying colors. Could we reach the point where beings we create in simulation actually perceive their world in the same way as we do. Is it ethical to create a conscious creature to serve our will? It would be like slavery. Or we couldn't really tell if the robots actually 'felt' anything on a emotional level. Mind-boggling stuff, truly.

      @JonMascar@JonMascar7 жыл бұрын
    • of course it's not "you" because "you" exist right NOW now "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this BAM "you" are something newer, and by the time "you" finish reading this Point being - fear of teleportation, and by extension death itself, is completely silly. The idea of a constant identity and "self" is illusory in the first place, "you" die all the time.

      @NoConsequenc3@NoConsequenc37 жыл бұрын
    • It's a bit like the thought that you could potentially not exist in time. You could be frozen in an instant, with only the feelings you presently have suggesting that there was something before. Of course, each instant you remember tells you that at that moment it was not the case, but it wouldn't even have to exist. It's a bit odd.

      @MentalVideographer@MentalVideographer7 жыл бұрын
    • It depends on what you consider "you." If the most fundamental thing that makes you "you" is your conscientiousness, then you'd have to find out if the most fundamental thing that makes you conscientious is chemical bonds and neurons firing in your brain. If that's the case, teleportation is possible because there is no physical law preventing an advance in technology that can measure chemical bonds and neurons. If the most fundamental thing that makes up conscientiousness is at the quantum level of the subatomic particles that make up your brain, then teleportation of exactly "you" is not possible because the act of measuring at the quantum level changes the particle or energy level of the particle being measured. At that point, you have to ask yourself, am I really going to change THAT much by teleporting? Right now, no one can be sure because science has not advanced that far.

      @michaelmcginnis1429@michaelmcginnis14297 жыл бұрын
  • u know something is confusing when u hear quantum.

    @Ikiguyy@Ikiguyy7 жыл бұрын
    • nuka cola quantum

      @lilith5865@lilith58656 жыл бұрын
    • When your username is Quantum but everything involving quantum confuses you.

      @Quantum-yz9fc@Quantum-yz9fc6 жыл бұрын
    • @@Quantum-yz9fc lmao

      @scenekid7493@scenekid74935 жыл бұрын
  • Henry. I love your videos. Keep doin' what you do.

    @steveblanmag7410@steveblanmag74103 жыл бұрын
  • Man, you are just amazing at explaining! Thank you for showing that my teleportation efforts won't be wasted. Please, give us more!

    @maxsagibgareev@maxsagibgareev7 жыл бұрын
  • MinutePhysics is becoming HourPhysics.

    @plumeater1@plumeater17 жыл бұрын
    • Only to hit the 10 min mark for that SWEET AD REVENUE BABY!

      @j.laffety328@j.laffety3287 жыл бұрын
    • Schmoorp Willakers i thought that was only with the old youtube? Did they bring it back? Was it never gone?

      @pom5221@pom52217 жыл бұрын
    • They brought it back i think

      @j.laffety328@j.laffety3287 жыл бұрын
    • more like 10MinutesPhysics

      @ThegeekforlifeBlogspot@ThegeekforlifeBlogspot7 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you so much! I did not get the explanation when I first read it on my textbook but now I've got a clearer picture

    @stefanocarini8117@stefanocarini8117 Жыл бұрын
  • Great video and well explained! I did have to slow it down some to follow at a good pace.

    @kevon217@kevon2172 жыл бұрын
  • What if the act of cloning is equivalent to an act of observation, which causes the superposition/wave function to collapse to a single state?

    @souravzzz@souravzzz7 жыл бұрын
    • You can't just leave out or reduce information and still call it a perfect copy

      @RRRaiken@RRRaiken7 жыл бұрын
    • But then both the original and the copy would have their superposition collapsed so... how exactly would that not be a perfect copy still? I also fail to see how any remotely real cloning apparatus could possibly NOT act as an observation and therefor throw out quantum mechanics in its entirety, rendering this whole equation mood, no?

      @Kasseenzettel@Kasseenzettel7 жыл бұрын
    • I think what the Observer Effect describes is that the act of observation will alter the state of the subject, so even though wave function collapses, the original object will experience change so it will not be a perfect copy... I could be wrong but I think using act of observation will result in an "Ok clone" mentioned in the video

      @RRRaiken@RRRaiken7 жыл бұрын
    • Chauncey 钟离 Hm. If you were to sort of "scan" the object and then clone it, I'm pretty sure you'd get a perfect copy. Now... I'll grant you though, by scanning the object I guess you did change it and so it's not really the actual original anymore, right? Like, by scanning the box we already determined whether or not the cat is alive. So while the original box had an "undead" cat, the scanned original has either or. And so does the clone, making it a perfect copy of the new original. But yea, I guess we did change the original first in this case so I suppose in that way it's not a perfect copy :/ Oh well, I'm just thinking out loud anyway, I don't actually understand this stuff :D

      @Kasseenzettel@Kasseenzettel7 жыл бұрын
    • the act of cloning IS an act of observation, for a machine to make a copy of whatever is in a box, it needs to know what is in the box. you can only get exploded gunpowder or unexploded gunpowder out of the machine, because only A or B went IN to the machine, we just didnt know what went into it. We would get exactly whatever went in, but it would be a copy of the observed particles.

      @WeAreGRID@WeAreGRID7 жыл бұрын
  • The long format is really good, the short ones seemed rushed anyways

    @micahgruenwald9321@micahgruenwald93217 жыл бұрын
  • 10-15 minutes videos is perfect, but rather shorter than longer, because you have topics that demands attention all the way through the video! Really liked it the length of this video, Keep going with that 😉

    @benjamintangen8838@benjamintangen88384 жыл бұрын
  • TIL: I am a superposition of knowing what the hell you’re talking about and not knowing what the hell you’re talking about.

    @EricEsser@EricEsser6 жыл бұрын
  • Finally a minute physic video where I knew the concept before the video, now I can die in peace. Also 10-15 min video > short video and

    @sourcecode991@sourcecode9917 жыл бұрын
  • That would be funny if the matrix exists and we're trying to make sense of physics when that's not even the real physics. Then we wake up and everything is fucked up and doesn't make sense to us because the rules of everything fundamental that we know are different. o_O

    @aidanmaley9826@aidanmaley98267 жыл бұрын
    • Aidan Maley I've thought of that before too

      @alexanderherzog3064@alexanderherzog30647 жыл бұрын
    • You might be interesting in reading about cartesian or academic skepticism.

      @samberg3864@samberg38647 жыл бұрын
    • That why pragmatism is the best approach to science. Who cares about the metaphysics, just do the thing.

      @ganondorfchampin@ganondorfchampin7 жыл бұрын
    • what if gravity pushed you away instead of pulling you

      @triggerdpersond5156@triggerdpersond51567 жыл бұрын
    • Mr Slayz, LMFAO the most powerful known psychedelic substance is DMT, and it's not really "where we go" but more of "what gets opened up to us in terms of perception" since it's a conscious/subconscious journey, not a physical one.

      @KyuubiSam@KyuubiSam7 жыл бұрын
  • I love the detail!!! Thank you!

    @augusteaston-calabria2422@augusteaston-calabria24225 жыл бұрын
  • 9:26rip stickman-clone pixelated to death.

    @humanatee6639@humanatee66395 жыл бұрын
  • Henry has discovered the KZhead algorithm.

    @DrBuffaloBalls@DrBuffaloBalls7 жыл бұрын
    • DrBuffaloBalls hahahahahah

      @Alkaloid-Odin@Alkaloid-Odin7 жыл бұрын
  • Love this in depth explanation man definitely keeping this as a reference for the future

    @SammytheSnail@SammytheSnail7 жыл бұрын
  • I liked that CGP Grey plug haha. Mind stretching videos. Enjoyed per usual. :)

    @The0rnate@The0rnate5 жыл бұрын
  • I did very much enjoy this video. Would love to see more

    @trainhxiiids@trainhxiiids6 жыл бұрын
  • 3Blue1Brown is very underrated

    @ToxicJassassin@ToxicJassassin6 жыл бұрын
  • I am happy as long as we can still teleport stuff.

    @ItsaJuraff@ItsaJuraff7 жыл бұрын
    • Willdabeast we can’t teleport. There was a whole theory but basically when something disappeared from a place, the sound waves would move way too fast and I would basically make a really loud sound that would make everyone around deaf (something like that)

      @upsidedown5763@upsidedown57636 жыл бұрын
    • how about teleporting bread ?

      @EndranExit@EndranExit6 жыл бұрын
    • EndranExit i have no idea

      @upsidedown5763@upsidedown57636 жыл бұрын
    • we can teleport via quantum entanglement but who wants to teleport the possibility of a dead cat?

      @pauldeddens5349@pauldeddens53496 жыл бұрын
    • We can teleport, a while back they teleported particles from I think England to France instantaneously through quantum entanglement, but if we were to teleport humans we would have to rip away every atom from our bodies and entangle it, and then reconstruct our bodies atom by atom, and then there’s the question of even if all the atoms are the same, is it still us? Is consciousness a simple matter of atoms? Or something we don’t yet understand?

      @LS-oh8kv@LS-oh8kv6 жыл бұрын
  • Really, it's clarity of explanatin that's more imprtant than 'proper time' video length. So a longer video, with the same clarityh as you give, would be ... more infrmative! Thhis is a Good Thing!

    @davidwright8432@davidwright84325 жыл бұрын
  • Love your videos. One suggestion. I’m old enough that my hearing isn’t as good as it once was. Background music, especially with higher frequencies and volume, makes it harder to understand what you’re saying. However, I really love the string bass you often use, and it doesn’t interfere with your message.

    @bobpickering1@bobpickering1 Жыл бұрын
  • I like how you used CGP Grey's Icon when talking about an ideal future.

    @TheGurumash@TheGurumash7 жыл бұрын
  • Love the longer format (and the sly CGPGrey reference)!

    @stefanbraham9902@stefanbraham99026 жыл бұрын
  • I'm suddenly reminded of Terry Pratchett's "Going Postal" which had the mail sorting engine that tapped into the space-time continuum and emitted mail from the future, mail from alternate universes, and notes people swore they had written and posted but never did.

    @hotlavatube@hotlavatube Жыл бұрын
  • great video! love the videos about quantum mechanics!

    @kellyrunnels5684@kellyrunnels56842 жыл бұрын
  • Great! I really liked this long format video!

    @GustavoCiacco@GustavoCiacco7 жыл бұрын
  • minute physics was about taking something complex and making it bite sized and easy to understand. 10 minutes of super positions, quantum mechanics, uncertainty principles etc might just be too much

    @ProbablyLies@ProbablyLies7 жыл бұрын
    • something as complex as quantum mechanics explained in 10 minutes is still quite succinct. 10 minutes is still quite bite sized for a dish like physics.

      @curiouscatlearns@curiouscatlearns7 жыл бұрын
    • Sir Big Balls Are you kdding me this was extremely simple to understand, it was as dumbed down as possible.

      @GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser@GrandMoffTarkinsTeaDispenser7 жыл бұрын
  • That was amazing. Of course, watching this video might be just a scratch on real understanding of no cloning theorem, but it was very carefully explained.

    @alyo7774@alyo77745 жыл бұрын
  • I love how this principle neatly solves the problem of teleportation that says, if teleportation involves copying you and placing that copy in some destination then the destination you is only a copy. And what's more, you could leave the original behind and not destroy it meaning there's 2 of you. So which is the real one. This principle says that that's not possible and that whichever one is identical at the quantum level to you before the teleportation is the real one.

    @mrsuperguy2073@mrsuperguy20735 жыл бұрын
  • I definetly vote for the LONGER videos!!!

    @YYYValentine@YYYValentine7 жыл бұрын
  • Wow, a 10-min video?! It is like it's Christmas again!

    @MrHSX@MrHSX7 жыл бұрын
  • 7:42 Look-It! CGPgrey! Two of my favorite explanatory YT channels in one place. Get Fact Fiend here, that’d be all three...

    @Sef_Era@Sef_Era5 жыл бұрын
  • Love this video... yes you should do more like this one!!!

    @davidmarmora2217@davidmarmora22173 жыл бұрын
  • Really appreciate your using Dirac notation and using actual mathematical theorems in the video :) Makes it more accurate while still accessible.

    @daniellasullivan6398@daniellasullivan63987 жыл бұрын
  • I 100% want more videos like this.

    @damienlocutus@damienlocutus7 жыл бұрын
  • That's exactly how I would tell! Wow, I'm impressed by level of exactliness!

    @aleksitjvladica.@aleksitjvladica.4 жыл бұрын
  • It’s 10^100^100 % ok to have longer videos Do keep them coming 👍

    @ignacysamborski7001@ignacysamborski70014 жыл бұрын
  • "minute" physics jkjk this is WAY better

    @twister2982@twister29827 жыл бұрын
  • That moment when you thought you were good at maths, lmao no

    @karangarg4631@karangarg46317 жыл бұрын
    • Are you in third grade?

      @hasan7275@hasan72756 жыл бұрын
    • Not that easy. |A> and |B> is actually functions (or wave functions), and the rule of addition and multiplication is not exactly the same as numbers (that we learn in fourth grade).

      @FranklinYu@FranklinYu6 жыл бұрын
  • I love it! Make more like this

    @hoorayformeallright@hoorayformeallright4 жыл бұрын
  • Love this channel!

    @YanivGorali@YanivGorali5 жыл бұрын
  • So i thought the title was "No Clothing" but this is way more interesting.

    @1999Dman1@1999Dman17 жыл бұрын
  • I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.

    @BernardoPatino@BernardoPatino7 жыл бұрын
    • I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.

      @Blox117@Blox1177 жыл бұрын
    • +Blox117 I was gonna make a joke about cloning, but someone might copy it.

      @xenom1592@xenom15927 жыл бұрын
    • I was gonna make a coke about ploning, but someone might jocy it.

      @lehnrik@lehnrik7 жыл бұрын
KZhead