The F-16s Gun Sounds Amazing

2024 ж. 19 Нау.
9 982 036 Рет қаралды

Пікірлер
  • *pccchhhht BRRRRRRRRRRR * will never get tired of insanely high fire rate weapons😩

    @salt-emoji@salt-emojiАй бұрын
    • Yeah they mostly miss on the battlefield though😂

      @billpugh58@billpugh58Ай бұрын
    • @@billpugh58 if you are shooting at an aircraft you only need a few shots to land

      @randomexcalmain4512@randomexcalmain4512Ай бұрын
    • ​@@billpugh58 we call that accuracy by volume

      @pickeljuice9325@pickeljuice9325Ай бұрын
    • @@billpugh58 Bro the pilots are so untrained, they cant even fire a bullet and get every single one of them to directly hit an enemy like a sniper but in the air.

      @maxwell6881@maxwell6881Ай бұрын
    • search "2000 rpm pistol"

      @6uiti@6uitiАй бұрын
  • F-16: my plane has a gun A-10: my Gun has a plane😅

    @aviationgeek21886@aviationgeek21886Ай бұрын
    • At Osan AB in Korea one day, playing D&D at the Rec Center, one of the players said he was an A-10 Pilot. I countered with, "With all due respect, Sir, no you aren't. "You are a GAU-8 Pilot, that wears an aircraft body." "I stand corrected, Specialist." "Wrong again, Sir, you're sitting."

      @TimeSurfer206@TimeSurfer206Ай бұрын
    • ​​@@TimeSurfer206and did the entire crowd start applauding too?

      @midlbrwn15@midlbrwn15Ай бұрын
    • Gun got wings 😅

      @confusedbuddy5156@confusedbuddy5156Ай бұрын
    • Stole

      @travishart4706@travishart4706Ай бұрын
    • I am the 666th like...antichrist confirmed! edit: aww, someone else liked the comment right after me and ruined it! 👿

      @pex_the_unalivedrunk6785@pex_the_unalivedrunk6785Ай бұрын
  • It’s crazy that it only takes 5 seconds to run out of ammunition, imagine being mid dog fight and all you hear is “BRRR-click”

    @Bubba.Bennettt@Bubba.BennetttАй бұрын
    • More like "Brrrreeeeee" as the rounds run out and you just hear the electric motor spinning the barrel. :)

      @HunterXray@HunterXrayАй бұрын
    • Honestly if this or its counterpart finds itself in a dog fight then they both already fucked up

      @midgarw6775@midgarw6775Ай бұрын
    • If you hear them the bullets weren’t intended for you

      @badmoose01@badmoose01Ай бұрын
    • if youre in an F16 and youre in a dogfight and have to use the M61 you have fucked up royally several times over

      @PostAloneD@PostAloneDАй бұрын
    • ​@@PostAloneD If you somehow manage to run out of ammo without shooting down your opponent on top of that.... Then Bro you never belonged in that fighter to begin with.

      @anarchyandempires5452@anarchyandempires5452Ай бұрын
  • F-16 is my everyday carry. Don't leave the house without it.

    @5fifty5@5fifty5Ай бұрын
    • Air defense missiles that are cheaper makes the bird go away. 😂 Remember the US has never faced an actual modern army with modern air defenses..

      @Truthorfib@Truthorfib26 күн бұрын
    • As it was meant to be.

      @Redslayer86@Redslayer8615 күн бұрын
    • Ol' reliable

      @Oderus1151@Oderus115119 сағат бұрын
  • A10 goes brrrt, F16 goes zrrrt

    @Karagoth444@Karagoth444Ай бұрын
    • Fr

      @kookie_krumbs@kookie_krumbsАй бұрын
    • Minigun go weeeee

      @AW-jy4bt@AW-jy4btАй бұрын
    • Got it, thanks 👍🏿

      @IceTTom@IceTTomАй бұрын
    • Money printer go DAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKADAKKA

      @godlugner5327@godlugner5327Ай бұрын
    • And we all humans goes, faaart... 😂😂😂

      @amldesh3808@amldesh3808Ай бұрын
  • Works perfectly for lightly armored targets, which just so happens to be ~99% of fighter aircraft.

    @kevinfidler6287@kevinfidler6287Ай бұрын
    • Who is in the 1% 💀

      @gamechip06@gamechip06Ай бұрын
    • I thought I read somewhere the other day that the last time a plane was lost due to plane-to-plane machine gun fire was in like 1992?

      @Vitamin_jp@Vitamin_jpАй бұрын
    • @@Vitamin_jp I'm kind of shocked it's that recent.

      @danielshults5243@danielshults5243Ай бұрын
    • @@gamechip06heavily armoured attack airplane like the a-10 or su-25

      @nguyenhoangan-matt@nguyenhoangan-mattАй бұрын
    • @@Vitamin_jpyeah that’s cause dogfighting never happens anymore everything is long range attacks now, which kinda render short range machine guns useless

      @connorbossong5773@connorbossong5773Ай бұрын
  • A-10: “I FIRE 45 RED BULL CANS A SECOND”

    @blakestidham3852@blakestidham3852Ай бұрын
    • W refrence

      @sometexanoffical@sometexanoffical29 күн бұрын
    • W reference

      @lukedukehunter76@lukedukehunter7629 күн бұрын
    • yah but if I fight a capable country with a good air force my A-10 gets shot out of the sky...

      @bigstuff52@bigstuff5227 күн бұрын
    • ​@@bigstuff52 Only 5 have been lost ever, it's not an air to air fighter, its a ground attack vehicle, a role in which performs like a surgeon's blade even the hardest terrorist fighters feared that noise in Iraq. It is a flying tank and not easy to knock out of the sky, one A10 in Iraq took a direct hit from a small shoulder fired SAM and still made it back to base.

      @rustynailz178@rustynailz17826 күн бұрын
    • ​@@rustynailz178yeah I saw s documentary on how they want to retire the a10 for the f35 Even though it was introduced in the 70s that thing is still highly effective even in today's advanced world. And despite its age it's still cheaper to maintain than the f35. I don't think anything will ever beat that brrrrrt sound

      @lilrich1243@lilrich124323 күн бұрын
  • “If you hear the sound, that means you’re alive” - Someone Sometime Ago

    @Scramify@ScramifyАй бұрын
  • Just to be clear, he said 100 20mm rounds per second, not 120mm rounds

    @tristandaries1129@tristandaries1129Ай бұрын
    • To be clear this device pushes 21 pounds of metal and high explosives at you at a flow rate of 1800 feet per second every second that it stays on.

      @ibelieveingaming3562@ibelieveingaming3562Ай бұрын
    • ​@@ibelieveingaming3562and 3 football fields

      @GewelReal@GewelRealАй бұрын
    • ​​@@ibelieveingaming3562 1800 feet? How many hands are these?

      @EarthIsFlat456@EarthIsFlat456Ай бұрын
    • ​@@ibelieveingaming3562for this, you have to calculate by switching the measurement system from Donuts-Per-Bald-Eagle to the all-sane and logical Metric system for a better understanding

      @music-pq7bj@music-pq7bjАй бұрын
    • ​@@EarthIsFlat456I don't know, but it's about half the width of your mom.

      @c1985paul@c1985paulАй бұрын
  • A minute of talking, 1 second of "The Amazing Gun Sounds". Can't do that to us man.

    @BariumCobaltNitrog3n@BariumCobaltNitrog3nАй бұрын
    • There was a second of gun sound? 😂

      @jev2867@jev2867Ай бұрын
    • @@jev2867pccchhhht BRRRRRRRRRRR!!

      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n@BariumCobaltNitrog3nАй бұрын
    • if he plays more than 1 second then the USAF will copyright strike his channel

      @DionLewiis@DionLewiisАй бұрын
    • @DionLewiis Sound copyright? He's got video clips.

      @jev2867@jev2867Ай бұрын
    • ​@@DionLewiis nah fool, you mean airstrike? 😂

      @fabianherrera5427@fabianherrera5427Ай бұрын
  • I spent years working on the weapons systems and loading F-16's. I loved that job.

    @KhrynTzu@KhrynTzuАй бұрын
    • sure

      @CrimeBeanus@CrimeBeanus21 күн бұрын
  • It's like the 22lr for Military Aircrafts: it might be small, but still gets the job done

    @creeper4481@creeper4481Ай бұрын
    • Bruh, 78 caliber is small 💀

      @Dragoneer@DragoneerАй бұрын
    • If you compare it to a 105mm, then yeah "For Military Aircrafts" meaning that in the world of Fighter Jets and Gunships, *this is the smallest Caliber*

      @creeper4481@creeper4481Ай бұрын
    • @@creeper4481 20mm. That’s still gonna cause a lot of damage to 99% of aircraft. It’s nothing like a 22LR in comparison lol…

      @Dragoneer@DragoneerАй бұрын
    • thats dumb. 20mm is still a cannon, not a rifle. much bigger than 50 cal which is still anti aircraft material

      @AdrianMartinez-wh4bp@AdrianMartinez-wh4bpАй бұрын
    • who referenced a rifle?@@AdrianMartinez-wh4bp

      @Bo12346hhgfgdg@Bo12346hhgfgdgАй бұрын
  • It's wild how the bullets are just inches from the fuselage as they exit the barrel.

    @Patrick_919@Patrick_919Ай бұрын
    • Not really, their shockwaves from travelling faster than speed of sound can't damage anything.

      @Isaac-ho8gh@Isaac-ho8ghАй бұрын
    • @@Isaac-ho8gh fkn WAT?

      @anthonylabrecque3396@anthonylabrecque3396Ай бұрын
    • ​@@anthonylabrecque3396why you don't not understand proper good?

      @Roddy556@Roddy556Ай бұрын
    • ​@@Roddy556bloody fucken

      @crf80fdarkdays@crf80fdarkdaysАй бұрын
    • ​@@Isaac-ho8gh There's only ever been one supersonic gun kill in history from what I understand, generally guns aren't used at supersonic speeds, they're used at close range after the fur ball starts and everyone's maneuvering so much their energy and speed are down.

      @dukecraig2402@dukecraig2402Ай бұрын
  • Calling 20mm tiny is crazy

    @Botmini17@Botmini17Ай бұрын
    • For real. That's freaking ridiculous. This is the kind of people that would diss 22.

      @ChesterManfred@ChesterManfredАй бұрын
    • Tbf he did say in comparison

      @khraix5908@khraix5908Ай бұрын
    • @@khraix590820mm is not that much smaller than a 30mm

      @jsosa5075@jsosa5075Ай бұрын
    • 20mm is still a damn anti-material round, the weapons firing them are actually referred to as "cannons", because they're well over the threshold of even .50 BMG, which is where man portable arms and true heavy armaments diverge. Sure, there are .50 BMG rifles, and even 20mm shoulder fired anti-tank rifles, but that's right at the upper limit of what you can put to your shoulder and fire without it becoming unsafe for the operator.

      @d3ltaohniner261@d3ltaohniner261Ай бұрын
    • 20mm is nothing. Im 7 inches 😂 myself

      @haribunty8577@haribunty8577Ай бұрын
  • Pilots say they only get two or three trigger pulls before the magazine is empty, so they have to be certain their target is lined up perfectly.

    @ChristianStout@ChristianStout24 күн бұрын
    • That's crazy. Is that the best way to do it?

      @betterthanyesterday3912@betterthanyesterday39129 күн бұрын
    • The recoil also pushes the craft so hard that it basically fights the engine and wins so they have to compensate when they fire

      @danielkeslerjr4407@danielkeslerjr44077 күн бұрын
  • I enjoyed loading/unloading, removing/installing these for many years. Even worked the weapons back shop for some time and had the pleasure of disassembling and reassembling them. Great times.

    @geoffreybailey6350@geoffreybailey6350Ай бұрын
    • Were we stationed or in tech school together? June Oct 97 tech school

      @thenorstar8955@thenorstar8955Ай бұрын
    • @@thenorstar8955 I went through tech school from August to December of 1998. I was stationed at Luke, Osan, Misawa, Kunsan, Lakenheath, Aviano, Kunsan again, and lastly Aviano (again).

      @geoffreybailey6350@geoffreybailey6350Ай бұрын
    • @@geoffreybailey6350 Osan 01-02?

      @thenorstar8955@thenorstar8955Ай бұрын
    • @@thenorstar8955 July 2000 - July 2001 36th FS

      @geoffreybailey6350@geoffreybailey6350Ай бұрын
    • @@geoffreybailey6350 I got to the 36th Feb of 01. So that's probably where I know you from.

      @thenorstar8955@thenorstar8955Ай бұрын
  • Doesn’t matter how tiny it is. When you’re a squishy little human, it’s gonna hurt. Edit: for those saying it’s not tiny, I know. I am simply referring to the video. Also, it’s relatively tiny compared to something like say a 30mm or a 40mm. Also for all those that said you won’t feel a thing, I know too. It’s a joke.

    @Stella-gm7bo@Stella-gm7boАй бұрын
    • doesn't*

      @sambrownericson@sambrownericsonАй бұрын
    • its not used against humans

      @ockerdebokx3369@ockerdebokx3369Ай бұрын
    • Sure, just its collateral damage. ​@@ockerdebokx3369

      @honor9lite1337@honor9lite1337Ай бұрын
    • @@ockerdebokx3369yeah but that shit would rip you up

      @orangeprideaviations@orangeprideaviationsАй бұрын
    • 20mm is not tiny 😮. Even if the A-10 Vulcan is 30mm. Miniguns use 7.62mm

      @AW-jy4bt@AW-jy4btАй бұрын
  • *"TOO CLOSE!! SWITCHING TO GUNS!!"* ~TOP GUN 1986

    @mr.robinson1982@mr.robinson1982Ай бұрын
    • The F16 basically has 5 short bursts... The F14 in Top Gun has unlimited ammo.

      @hanc37@hanc37Ай бұрын
    • @mr.robinson1982 who care

      @robertsaget6918@robertsaget6918Ай бұрын
    • If your too close for missiles you are too close for guns lol.

      @Twitch380@Twitch380Ай бұрын
    • Yeah, sounds amazing. IF WE COULD HEAR IT!!

      @geoffhipwell2198@geoffhipwell2198Ай бұрын
    • ​@@Twitch380 not really. There are IR and radar missiles - short and long ranged ones. Nowadays there are IR missiles that can pull 40-60 Gs and hit the fast moving target 6 km away easily. Radar missiles are even more curse pulling less Gs (30 probably), but they have effective range of 140 km. The dogfights are really rare right now, but if they happen you can hit the target with 20mm shell 200-1200 meters away. All missiles that were designed as very short range, like SRAAM, were mostly failure because they had to be very light, had almost no fuel and hardly stabilized.

      @Creamin_All_Offensive@Creamin_All_Offensive29 күн бұрын
  • I got to hear this in real life when I was a child. My dad flew these and I got to go with him when he had to go do ground coordination at the local training range. They had a large parachute painted like a target strung up between two beams and the planes would roll in very low. The sound was both deafening and awe inspiring.

    @rhone733@rhone733Ай бұрын
    • Cool childhood.

      @lewisner@lewisnerАй бұрын
    • Gosh, lucky!

      @dansweda712@dansweda712Ай бұрын
    • Hell yea!! Good for you! Badass

      @josephtruskoaski230@josephtruskoaski230Ай бұрын
    • I heard it too doing some work at the Melrose Bombing Range in New Mexico. I started running. It scared the hell out of me.

      @arsin1164@arsin1164Ай бұрын
  • F16 avionics tech 2002 to 2008, these guns were a beast on this tiny platform!

    @zoanth4@zoanth4Ай бұрын
  • As an F-16 pilot once told me, if you have to use your gun, you already fucked up.

    @rolfboettger9490@rolfboettger9490Ай бұрын
    • And thats why the f-35 has no gun, (it has a gun pod attachment because of FUDS and Reformers) and new rifles don’t have bayonets. The only thing you should do if you find yourself having to use the gun on a fighter, or the bayonet on your rifle, is find the officers who put you in that situation and have some kind words with them.

      @purplepenguin43@purplepenguin43Ай бұрын
    • @@purplepenguin43you have the bayonet on your rifle to use on your officers!

      @jooot_6850@jooot_6850Ай бұрын
    • Too close for missles, I’m switching to guns

      @anduril7401@anduril7401Ай бұрын
    • @@purplepenguin43 Still the F-35A intended for Air Force strategy and doctrines have built in Gatling cannon

      @amienmoslim2892@amienmoslim2892Ай бұрын
    • Would an F-16 still occasionally do CAS gun runs, or is its gatling not really meant for that at all? Asking in case video game depictions of the F-16 are blatantly inaccurate

      @iPlayOnSpica@iPlayOnSpicaАй бұрын
  • “Why are you reading a washing machine manual?”

    @lynx642@lynx642Ай бұрын
    • General Electric

      @ashiielonely2077@ashiielonely2077Ай бұрын
    • *_TheRussianBager_*

      @srinivaschilakala216@srinivaschilakala216Ай бұрын
    • “This is not a washing machine manual.”

      @erevansilverfrond4911@erevansilverfrond4911Ай бұрын
    • "Wdym it says general electrics right there"

      @Raptorfired@RaptorfiredАй бұрын
    • One makes things clean, the other dissapear

      @887Bingo@887BingoАй бұрын
  • That’s a serious weapon, especially on a sleek as sonic jet. 😮

    @malcolmr3@malcolmr3Ай бұрын
  • "Is there a single fire setting? I'm on a budget" ATF

    @Astrix_Jaeger@Astrix_JaegerАй бұрын
    • Maybe try a 20 round burst mode to conserve ammo and not run dry too soon?

      @edb3877@edb387723 күн бұрын
  • Remember the movie Iron Eagle, man every kid in the 80’s wanted to be a fighter pilot.

    @user-qi3qk5ss7p@user-qi3qk5ss7pАй бұрын
    • No i member Top Gun when they were playing volleyball.

      @kevind1980@kevind1980Ай бұрын
    • Yeah, Top Gun for kids😅

      @emgee44@emgee44Ай бұрын
    • "CHAPPYYY"

      @anthonybatissa1417@anthonybatissa1417Ай бұрын
    • @@kevind1980 but that was an F14 not 16 Silly GOOSE!

      @anthonybatissa1417@anthonybatissa1417Ай бұрын
    • RIP Lous Gossett JR

      @mjjumps@mjjumpsАй бұрын
  • "One spins to make things clean, one spin to make things disappear" - a wise man

    @goodvibesonly3844@goodvibesonly3844Ай бұрын
    • Source is Russian Badger's A10 short. For those unaware.

      @Skykid3307@Skykid3307Ай бұрын
    • gotta love the russian badger

      @BenChristensen-um3ml@BenChristensen-um3mlАй бұрын
    • I watched that video, too! 😂 lol

      @badreality2@badreality2Ай бұрын
    • @@BenChristensen-um3ml based

      @CedricStormstride@CedricStormstrideАй бұрын
    • If one of those is after you ... Your hamburger meat .

      @santosmadrigal3702@santosmadrigal3702Ай бұрын
  • "It costs four hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon… for twelve seconds."

    @uldams@uldamsАй бұрын
    • holy crap

      @kakasotto3rd444@kakasotto3rd4444 күн бұрын
  • “If you hear the sound, you weren't it's target"

    @Sky-nb8qh@Sky-nb8qh13 сағат бұрын
  • 5 seconds for the entire magazine? You better not miss!

    @AbstractHexagon@AbstractHexagonАй бұрын
    • The plane's onboard computer limits the gun to short bursts to preserve ammunition.

      @RaderizDorret@RaderizDorretАй бұрын
    • Id imagine its short half second bursts.

      @kevinforget549@kevinforget549Ай бұрын
    • @@kevinforget549 My understanding is it fires in bursts of 20-50 rounds but I'm not certain about that.

      @RaderizDorret@RaderizDorretАй бұрын
    • big weekend warrior fan are ya? not a magazine and that's quite a bit of time

      @whofookncares2149@whofookncares2149Ай бұрын
    • ​@@whofookncares2149 ironic name

      @dominickmaddox9576@dominickmaddox9576Ай бұрын
  • I was an aircraft armament technician on the F-16. The gun system was my favorite part of the job. Worked backshop maintenance and flight line operations. Exciting times!

    @MrBusta30408@MrBusta30408Ай бұрын
    • Armament Technician..., weapons. You we're weapons. 😉

      @clydefreeman1067@clydefreeman1067Ай бұрын
    • Это не ты ли Боинг собираешь который постоянно падает? С пушками тоже так будет?

      @user-mb8to4ke4y@user-mb8to4ke4yАй бұрын
    • @@clydefreeman1067 yes

      @MrBusta30408@MrBusta30408Ай бұрын
    • i must say, these f16s give lots of power

      @Vi3tKid420@Vi3tKid420Ай бұрын
    • @@Vi3tKid420 yeah for sure! I got an incentive ride in one over S. Korea. Pulled 8.7 g's and still have my air sickness bags lol!

      @MrBusta30408@MrBusta30408Ай бұрын
  • The F16 still packs a punch all these years later, an iconic bird

    @TheLeadSled@TheLeadSled14 күн бұрын
  • Love the A-10 and it will put in major hell on the ground like nothing else, but the F-16 is a little monster and it can effectively handle most situations.

    @theaceofspades485@theaceofspades485Ай бұрын
  • The f16 is such a timeless and beautiful aircraft ngl

    @michaelteh7002@michaelteh7002Ай бұрын
    • Worked on F-15Es, F-16s and F-22s. Had an incentive flight on the 15 and 16. Of my career, the F-16 was my favorite. It's an unbelievable aircraft, especially with the concurrent and recent CCIP modifications and updates on the new blocks.

      @janus3555@janus3555Ай бұрын
    • Hard to believe the F16 is a 1970’s design…. It still looks very modern.

      @p99guy@p99guyАй бұрын
    • It's grown on me a lot. I was shocked to see in person how much smaller it is than an F-15 (and presumably F-14).

      @Draliseth@DralisethАй бұрын
    • @@p99guy I agree

      @michaelteh7002@michaelteh7002Ай бұрын
    • Since I was a kid, I see them regularly, in my area, never get tired of seing them fly by

      @FSousA7X@FSousA7XАй бұрын
  • Just a small correction. The F-15 was the aircraft that was designed to have a gun to fix the problem of no gun in the original F-4s, the F-16 just followed suit.

    @legendaryash@legendaryashАй бұрын
    • I think what he means is that the F-16 fills more similar role to the F-4, and also that every fighter after the F-4 has learned the same lesson when it comes to having a cannon.

      @CeeJMantis@CeeJMantisАй бұрын
    • The F-4E fixed the problem of having no gun by 1967 by having a gun, the same M61 used up to the F-22. The claims of the short are false, pretty much in line with most of this AI generated trash. The newer jets were made to be better at a lot of things. However, the F-4 not having a gun wasn’t one of them, cause the Phantom had a great gun and was getting kills with it long before the 15 or 16 first flew.

      @therealinak@therealinakАй бұрын
    • The F-104 was the first to have a rotary cannon, soon followed by the F-100. Major mistake not including one for the F-4, they assumed missiles would’ve all they needed…. Wrong!

      @garyeaton5719@garyeaton5719Ай бұрын
    • This is partially true but doesn't reflect what really happened. The F111 was supposed to be what the F15 became but didn't pan out as planned. Then studies to develop the F15 happened, experience in Vietnam showed a smaller and lighter craft with high thrust to weight would offer better performance and the pentagon realized the F15 program couldn't deliver enough fighters in number at low enough cost. So the F16 was a lighter and cheaper day fighter at first to supplement the heavier more expensive F15. Also the poor performance of missiles during Vietnam caused guns to be brought back into the basic designs.

      @MisterMick113@MisterMick113Ай бұрын
    • ​@garyeaton5719 lacking a gun was not as big of an issue as you think it was. The missiles worked, it was failure in other fields that made them ineffective. They had no way to identify what they were locking onto beyond visual range, which means that that Soviet jet bomber you just fired a radar guided missile at might actually be one of those new jet airliners that were becoming all the rage. That's why the F14 tomcat was equipped with TCS (Television Camera System), and later IRST (Infared Search and Track), the latter being a feture of all current fighter aircraft. The F4 could also carry a podded gun

      @skyraider87@skyraider87Ай бұрын
  • 'We're taking casualties! Requesting a dubstep sample from the air immediately!' 'Got ya, over.' *Brrrzzzzz....YaaYUaaAAaaaa*

    @RealmOfTheMadMan@RealmOfTheMadManАй бұрын
  • Thats why they fire only when ready. Quick burst is all thats needed because those rounds are no joke on target.

    @chickydogbreath1@chickydogbreath1Ай бұрын
  • Former F16 armament specialist here....this entire weapon package fits neatly directly behind the pilot....the gun itself is a marval of machine work as it is so small....the spent rounds do not get ejected but will stay recycled inside the rotary drum magazine

    @jonsingle1614@jonsingle1614Ай бұрын
    • CIWS tech here. That's my gun in your plane. I think that's an awesome use for it. On the CIWS we can run the gun with a pneumatic drive so the fire rate is 4500/min. but we can't get it to fly😂

      @ryanmartin4602@ryanmartin4602Ай бұрын
    • Crazy how you guys are casually commenting on KZhead about a weapon on a multi million dollar craft that I fell in love with as a kid from watching top gun, and I get to comment along with…wth

      @m.e.1704@m.e.1704Ай бұрын
    • @@ryanmartin4602more like our gun on your ship. Built for the AF back in the 50’s and still goin strong although through several modifications. The navy put longer barrels on it and it works well for y’all too.

      @Mango10449@Mango10449Ай бұрын
    • Civi question! If it can only hold what seems to be a limited number of rounds, why make the fire rate so high as to “run out quicker” I’m not saying or thinking of a spray and pray and I get the other fighter will only be in front for a split second but if the rate of fire was slowed, the velocity should stay the same but you get more use from the weapon?? Also, is it more of like a side arm? “If you have to use them, you’re already fucked” mussels first type beat?

      @zachbogan4674@zachbogan4674Ай бұрын
    • @@zachbogan4674when you only get a split second to hit something would you rather hit it 10 times or 50 times? In that split second you don’t want your target to live and be able to shoot back.

      @bht22582@bht22582Ай бұрын
  • I had the opportunity to work on the M61A1 for the F-14 and F-18 aircraft and it was awesome. We even fired 25 rounds in the firing tunnel at Pax River Maryland and I hate to admit it was an incredible experience to feel your body shaking 25 times before you realize that it fired.

    @melendjam@melendjamАй бұрын
    • I noticed the guy using a hand tool to load the rounds. Do they ever allow the use of power tools for that part (likeduring actual wartime for instance)? Or it's it just to delicate/dangerous?

      @tracewallace23@tracewallace23Ай бұрын
    • With that firerate all you felt must be just 0.25 seconds of a zrrt lmao

      @mdenizcoban@mdenizcobanАй бұрын
    • @@mdenizcoban The firing rate in the ground for the M61A1 is 7,200 rounds per minute so based on my calculations it was .00347 of a second.

      @melendjam@melendjamАй бұрын
    • @@tracewallace23 They do use a power tool once in a while but gun conveyors jam often so they have to be careful.

      @melendjam@melendjamАй бұрын
    • @@melendjam General Electric's website says 6000 rpm for its firerate though

      @mdenizcoban@mdenizcobanАй бұрын
  • They learned from the blunder of the cannon-less F-4 Phantom.

    @soundkode@soundkodeАй бұрын
  • first time i have EVER heard an F-16 firing its gun like that, and I was not expecting such a wickedly cool sound

    @Aardcore@Aardcore29 күн бұрын
  • "Cousin of the GAU-8" The M61 is more like the dad, considering it came decades before the GAU-8. It was basically THE electric gatling gun that popularized the concept of such as aircraft armament and paved the way for mass adoption of electric gatlings. The GAU-8 as a weapon wouldn't exist if not for the M61.

    @StrikeNoir105E@StrikeNoir105EАй бұрын
    • That's it...

      @user-lj5mm1of7m@user-lj5mm1of7mАй бұрын
    • M61 walked so GAU-8 could run. Or more accurately, M61 “brrrt”ed so GAU-8 could “BRRRT”.

      @UGNAvalon@UGNAvalonАй бұрын
  • F-16 rotary cannon: hits the target A-10 rotary cannon: hits the targ- wait shit that was a British convoy

    @zackarysmith1520@zackarysmith1520Ай бұрын
    • Too soon

      @markzambelli@markzambelliАй бұрын
    • "What do you mean IFF? You have Mk. 1 eyeballs with a 'binocular' attatchment!"

      @Doom_Slayer_919@Doom_Slayer_919Ай бұрын
    • Ooooof

      @thesquirrel914@thesquirrel914Ай бұрын
    • Nope. lost a good friend in that one!@@markzambelli

      @chrishewitt4220@chrishewitt4220Ай бұрын
    • ​@@chrishewitt4220Sorry to hear that. Blue on Green is a lesson we should have learned a century ago.

      @Deridus@DeridusАй бұрын
  • The GAU8 is actually the enfant terrible of the M61 Vulcan, which came into being in the 1960s because the USAF struggled to find a regular cannon that didn't have issues, it has been and still is the best aircraft mounted gun system period. And Goes back as far as the century series fighters, the F104 was the 1st.

    @keptinkaos6384@keptinkaos6384Ай бұрын
  • One of my favorite jet fighters never knew how the gun sounded till today awesome

    @sledgenwedge@sledgenwedgeАй бұрын
  • "It costs 400,000$ to fire this weapon for 12 seconds" [Edit]: I'm surprised how many commentators didn't get the reference

    @G0RSHK0V@G0RSHK0VАй бұрын
    • Can't believe I had to scroll this far down to find this comment.

      @DTSephiroth@DTSephirothАй бұрын
    • Yes America getting ripped off as always

      @elitex50@elitex50Ай бұрын
    • didnt they say it unloads full capacity in 5 seconds? You would really wanna be dead on target, seems like a mostly back up weapon

      @oynlengeymer2434@oynlengeymer2434Ай бұрын
    • 12 seconds? Where’d you get that from?

      @lennartjuhh@lennartjuhhАй бұрын
    • @@lennartjuhh tf2 meet the heavy reference

      @Coronavirus-dx7xv@Coronavirus-dx7xvАй бұрын
  • Need to clarify, the M61 is not a smaller version of the GAU-8, quite the opposite. The M61 Vulcan entered service in 1959, and the GAU-8 entered in ‘77, based off the existing M61 Vulcan design.

    @doesitmatter1667@doesitmatter1667Ай бұрын
    • He said smaller cousin as in they’re both Gatling type guns. Don’t think he was saying the M61 was based on the GAU-8. Just that they’re in the same family of type of gun. Thanks for the fun fact though anyway.

      @tripnsip@tripnsipАй бұрын
    • as awesome as the gatling gun is, its like having a cd player in your 2024 tesla 🥹

      @aSSGoblin1488@aSSGoblin1488Ай бұрын
    • That is the same as saying that the GAU-8 is the bigger version. Being a different version makes no inference of which came first. The opposite of being a smaller version, would be being a bigger version.

      @markdaniel8740@markdaniel8740Ай бұрын
    • Blaine used the smaller cousin in predator.

      @guyharrison909@guyharrison909Ай бұрын
  • The M61 is the DADDY to the GAU-8. This thing was on the F-104 folks.. btw, it is a rotary CANNON. Not a "machine gun"...

    @karlchilders5420@karlchilders5420Ай бұрын
  • I absolutely love that we made the actual world's first hypersonic to fit the coolest war machines we've ever made. I mean when you combine the F-22 with a hypersonic you literally have badass in physical form.

    @johndoe8785@johndoe878523 күн бұрын
  • I used to work the radio at Avon Park Gunnery Range near Sebring, FL and can still hear in my mind the bzzzzzzzzzt of those 20mm Vulcans. Even after 50 years.

    @wrightflyer7855@wrightflyer7855Ай бұрын
    • I was the ammo handling system Project Engineer for both the F-15E and the F-16 at General Dynamics in Vermont. During acceptance testing, these things would really rip. So impressive. Hunters who illegally hunted at the firing range would hear the pre-fire alarm go off and would duck behind a tree. They were incredibly naive. 😅

      @Spirit-jm6ll@Spirit-jm6llАй бұрын
  • I love the way it got integrated to the airplane bodywork, so neat and elegant ❤

    @javierromo4394@javierromo4394Ай бұрын
  • Never thought I'd hear a M61 or an F-16 being referred to as tiny multiple times...

    @jytpsd07@jytpsd073 күн бұрын
  • F16 is like a cousin that works 9-5 while A10 is a cousin that invites you for a beer and a redbull on tuesday night

    @njdarudedovich6126@njdarudedovich612614 күн бұрын
  • "It weighs one hundred and fifty kilograms and fires two hundred dollar custom-tooled cartridges at a rate of ten thousand rounds per minute... It costs four hundred thousand dollars to fire this weapon for twelve seconds."

    @torginus@torginusАй бұрын
    • Best comment ever!!! 🤯🤯🤯🤯

      @Smartsometimes@SmartsometimesАй бұрын
    • Yay all with USA tax Money

      @sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647@sayingnigromakesyoutubecry2647Ай бұрын
    • I call bullshit on that. There's no way such a mass-produced cartridge costs 2000$ per pop.

      @user-bi7xd8ry5p@user-bi7xd8ry5pАй бұрын
    • ​@@user-bi7xd8ry5p Exactly. Even HEDP rounds aren't that much even accounting for fusing. Scale of manufacturing states that. The more you make of something the less each unit of that thing will cost. So yeah, bullshit.

      @repairdroid77@repairdroid77Ай бұрын
    • wow

      @JasonAStillman@JasonAStillmanАй бұрын
  • "A Massive cannon for a Tiny aircraft" See babe. I am an F16 😅

    @tsikanpanda@tsikanpandaАй бұрын
    • Oh come on bro why

      @SirNobleIZH@SirNobleIZHАй бұрын
    • ​@@SirNobleIZH Lol

      @112mirai@112miraiАй бұрын
    • Bruh.

      @snakeeyes9246@snakeeyes9246Ай бұрын
    • Fuckin King 🙌🏽

      @zachbogan4674@zachbogan4674Ай бұрын
    • Lol!

      @Paratrooper.3695@Paratrooper.3695Ай бұрын
  • The F-16 has to be one of the most beautiful aircraft ever

    @Erk350@Erk350Ай бұрын
  • Same one in the F14 Tomcat that I used to work on. Makes the same sound too. Always a treat when they tested those near the aircraft carrier.

    @laserdiscphan@laserdiscphan26 күн бұрын
  • Ugggh, As a USAF Ammo troop, I remember having to dump cans of these rounds out on a grounded table, count them, then load them into a UAL and run them out to the flightline to load into the aircraft. Read some comments in here and thought I would add that these blue headed rounds are for training, like at the gun range for aircraft for instance, but we also had high explosive rounds and armor piercing rounds for those that said this gun wasn't effective for vehicles. LOL. These guns will hardly ever be used for aircraft to aircraft battles, because it just doesnt happen that often anymore. Regardless, these guns when loaded with the proper ammo types will straight up murder soft targets, vehicles, radar and SAM sites or anything else if bombs and missles are expended. For anything like heavy armored vehicles like tanks, buildings, and wide areas of targets, the 105MM round from the AC-130 Gunship will get the job done and also has different round types depending on target. Same for the A-10 and every other aircraft. You have to think about all the different types of ammo or munitions available, make the best choice of available ammo types for the mission, etc. to get the job done fast and effective. The way the combat sorties are planned out is kind of like ordering pizza for the aircraft, but are usually already built or loaded in a deployed environment prior to missions due to rapid deployment priorities. In a non combat or training environment, they tell us what they need, we inspect, count, and load or build them, then deliver them. Gun rounds, bombs, missiles, countermeasures, and everything else that goes boom. We also have to recycle all the brass from expended rounds.

    @djblade337@djblade337Ай бұрын
    • Thanks for serving. Interesting information from your viewpoint as well.

      @karnagefails333@karnagefails333Ай бұрын
    • You had to MANUALLY COUNT those rounds?!

      @baked_beans_779@baked_beans_779Ай бұрын
    • @@baked_beans_779 I barely know how to use a BB gun lol

      @karnagefails333@karnagefails333Ай бұрын
    • @@karnagefails333 I meant the aircraft but yeah

      @baked_beans_779@baked_beans_779Ай бұрын
    • @@baked_beans_779 Shit, I'm sorry dude 🤣

      @karnagefails333@karnagefails333Ай бұрын
  • When the sky starts screaming at you in tv static, RUN.

    @the_punch_line9474@the_punch_line9474Ай бұрын
    • 🏆

      @jhaimp.sullivan5618@jhaimp.sullivan5618Ай бұрын
    • You’re already dead if you hear that noise

      @PacificWestwest@PacificWestwestАй бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂 damn this comment is pure gold man

      @officialluckyturn@officialluckyturnАй бұрын
    • If you heard it, either you weren't the target or you got very lucky.

      @xscaliersolid1194@xscaliersolid1194Ай бұрын
    • The rounds are supersonic: they arrive on target before the sound they emit. You will get killed or see devastation around you before you hear that sound

      @ericv-kj3du@ericv-kj3duАй бұрын
  • As someone who doesnt like guns cause of the destructive power, that sound is still one of the wildest things ive heard that fascinates me

    @milodiehl954@milodiehl95426 күн бұрын
  • "Switching to guns" "Be carful now, remember, 5 seconds of fire!"

    @Daveyboy4@Daveyboy420 күн бұрын
  • Tfw f-16 ammo drum lasts longer than you do 😔

    @Rakesh-ec2pz@Rakesh-ec2pzАй бұрын
    • Can get about 510 rounds in the drum, chutes and gun when installing rounds through. Depending on how the slack is whenever we reinstall a gun, sometimes you can get 511 in. That extra round when the gun is set to 3000/minute is an extra 20 milliseconds of fire time, lol.

      @janus3555@janus3555Ай бұрын
    • Slow down hahaha

      @Bug_Bait@Bug_BaitАй бұрын
  • at those airshows the crackling you hear of the plane firing is actually the bullets impacting the terrain or passing by. The Wuuu that comes after is the actual plane firing them, pitched up because of the doppler effect

    @alpenfoxvideo7255@alpenfoxvideo7255Ай бұрын
    • 🤯

      @doctaflo@doctafloАй бұрын
    • They don't fire live rounds at airshows.

      @fernandorosales2418@fernandorosales2418Ай бұрын
    • @@fernandorosales2418 you've never been to Axalp then. The bullet impacts targets less than 800mt from the crowd. They're non-trace training rounds, but still those are real bullets flying in the air and they sound exactly like this. Blanks are not a thing for the vulcan

      @alpenfoxvideo7255@alpenfoxvideo7255Ай бұрын
    • @fernandorosales2418 they will do strafing runs in front of live audiences. They use TP or blue tip rounds. Really common. Actually.

      @Blackssayniggasodoi@BlackssayniggasodoiАй бұрын
    • ​@@alpenfoxvideo7255 surely it's not less then 800 meters from the crowd, that is scary close and surely ricochets could be an issue. Would like to see video of this

      @crf80fdarkdays@crf80fdarkdaysАй бұрын
  • And as we all know, sound is all that matters on social media.I mean the battle zone

    @har8397@har839718 күн бұрын
  • I don’t think my mind can comprehend how some type of machinery can throw 100 rounds a second down range like that just seems out of this world

    @Cisco3Pancho@Cisco3PanchoАй бұрын
  • Fun fact: in addition to the Air Force's F-16 and other aircraft, the M61 is also the heart of the Navy's CIWS onboard ships and the Army's C-RAM. Thank you General Electric!

    @Poets04@Poets04Ай бұрын
    • It’s been General Dynamics for years. A lot of serious engineering went into system development and testing. The basic gun has remained essentially the same (M61A1/A2) but the creative ways the ammunition handling systems have morphed to fit space constraints is very impressive.

      @Spirit-jm6ll@Spirit-jm6llАй бұрын
    • They’re on the 18’s too

      @jcannnonproductions756@jcannnonproductions756Ай бұрын
    • Or the simpler version for those that don’t know what it looks like: R2D2 with a gatling gun that shoots down missiles and mortars.

      @runelimbron7957@runelimbron7957Ай бұрын
  • F16: SAY HELLO TO MA LITTLE FRIEND

    @Falconz-pl7ry@Falconz-pl7ryАй бұрын
    • Lifeline reference?

      @baked_beans_779@baked_beans_779Ай бұрын
    • Привет от МиГ-29 или от Су-27?😂

      @Mixanick08@Mixanick08Ай бұрын
  • Its cute. Its like a baby GAU-8. A10: "BRRRRRRRRRRTTTTTTTTT" F16/Vulcan: "beeeeeeeerrrrppppp"

    @BearanormalPodcast@BearanormalPodcast2 күн бұрын
  • Holy shit! Sounds like the grunt in the sky that thing emits sounds like it came straight out the 9th ring of hell!!! 😅😅

    @Aintchasinglegacy@AintchasinglegacyАй бұрын
  • Massive respect and appreciation to all the technicians, specialists and mechanics doing all the hard work behind the scenes keeping those Fighter Jets well armed and in perfect mechanical condition. All of you deserve equal glory and gratitude as the pilots get. Without all of you breaking your backs and technical/mechanical knowledge. Those pilots would not be flying anything.

    @KXTA007@KXTA007Ай бұрын
    • The 16 is a very labor intensive aircraft, I can speak from personal experience.

      @bikeislife8405@bikeislife8405Ай бұрын
    • @@bikeislife8405how many hours does it take to make one?

      @mohamedsaid9416@mohamedsaid9416Ай бұрын
    • @@mohamedsaid9416 I've only maintained them, a gun system install can take up to 8 hours!

      @bikeislife8405@bikeislife8405Ай бұрын
  • They had these guns in a towed version in the 82nd airborne until after Dessert Shield/Storm in an air defense/anti-armor roll. As a weapon fired at ground targets it was terrifying to watch, feel and listen to. At night it spit 10 foot of flame and the rounds lit up and shredded whatever was in its way. Besides 2000lbs JDAMs they were the most violent weapon I’ve witnessed. They were an amazing psychological weapon alone.

    @flddoc2@flddoc2Ай бұрын
    • You are referring to the M167 VADS. honestly its probably worth re adopting for dealing with drones today.

      @dominuslogik484@dominuslogik484Ай бұрын
    • Modern day dragons.

      @DirtyRobohobo@DirtyRobohoboАй бұрын
    • @@dominuslogik484We have; the C-RAM Centurion uses the same high-speed 20mm autocannon as the M167 attached to more capable fire control systems.

      @bartolomeothesatyr@bartolomeothesatyrАй бұрын
  • Loading the machine gun with a socket wrench is genius

    @GalaxyNewsRadio_@GalaxyNewsRadio_Ай бұрын
  • Same gun as the Mk15 Phalanx CIWS. Having heard it first-hand, I can tell you that it sounds beautiful!❤

    @jschiffel@jschiffel25 күн бұрын
  • That video of the sound is my favorite video on the internet.

    @aaronlarson4358@aaronlarson4358Ай бұрын
  • now that's a lot of freedom

    @brunoboy1143@brunoboy1143Ай бұрын
  • It sounds like the little bro of the A-10's gun. It's weirdly adorable.

    @zow8238@zow823826 күн бұрын
  • 12:15 “ doesn’t sound like a scam it sounds like a robbery g “ I’m dead 😂😂😂

    @alimabrok9328@alimabrok9328Ай бұрын
  • Now imagine one of these being carried around by a half naked Inuit in a -20C freezer.

    @IIGrayfoxII@IIGrayfoxIIАй бұрын
    • What 😂

      @kingdedede1066@kingdedede1066Ай бұрын
    • @@kingdedede1066Look up metal gear solid Mainly the second Vulcan Raven fight

      @IIGrayfoxII@IIGrayfoxIIАй бұрын
    • @@kingdedede1066it's a reference to Vulcan Raven from metal gear solid

      @solidsnake-er9ik@solidsnake-er9ikАй бұрын
    • @@solidsnake-er9ik thanks

      @kingdedede1066@kingdedede1066Ай бұрын
    • Ah, just another day at the office, I see.

      @TimeSurfer206@TimeSurfer206Ай бұрын
  • That explains why I love firing the F-16 in any fighter aircraft game. their gun sound is different

    @ryuhayashi97@ryuhayashi97Ай бұрын
    • "Different." F-100 Super Saber: F-105 Thunderchief: F-106 Delta Dart: F-111 Aardvark: F-4 Phantom II: F-14 Tomcat: F-15 Eagle: F-16 Fighting Falcon: YF-17 Cobra: F/A-18 Hornet: F-22 Raptor:

      @DeNihility@DeNihilityАй бұрын
  • It does not eject the empty casings, they go back in the drum and are unloaded when new rounds are fed into the drum on the tarmac.

    @veronicasteigre2269@veronicasteigre2269Ай бұрын
  • In just over 5 seconds? Ha!! get on my level, I unload my entire load in just 3 seconds 😂

    @Ghost51492@Ghost51492Ай бұрын
    • 🤢

      @lxp@lxp9 күн бұрын
  • My entire years salary in one spray

    @ShinNohara-bs4mk@ShinNohara-bs4mkАй бұрын
    • USAF 2W1 here. Copypasta meme-ry aside, we reuse the spent brass and with TP rounds, a normal sortie is 50-150 rounds expended (Almost never seen a full drum of 510 used in testing). Given the material cost of repacking, it's 115-350 dollars per sortie. But we only fire live rounds in a TDY operation which is two to three times a year. During an entire Operation Redflag in Nellis, for two weeks, the total cost of gun repacking may get to your pay for a few months. It's one of the cheapest expenditures considering the other munitions we use during those TDYs. Chaff and Flare are the other cheap cost option, similar to the rounds.

      @janus3555@janus3555Ай бұрын
    • @@janus3555 definitely cheaper than running a test on Aegis or Patriot systems with live fire lmao

      @dominuslogik484@dominuslogik484Ай бұрын
  • “Smaller cousin of the A10s GAU8A. But it can still turn a human into a veneer”

    @14rs2@14rs2Ай бұрын
  • You know the information of gun is valid when you hear irish accent.

    @CounterMan-ny8xo@CounterMan-ny8xo2 күн бұрын
  • Still lasts longer than me 😢.

    @_Squish.@_Squish.Ай бұрын
  • Out of missiles, switching to guns... Topgun Maverick 👍🇺🇲

    @LneAlphaWlf@LneAlphaWlfАй бұрын
    • Yes. We fly the flag proudly for Biden and our love for his admin. Keep flying it brotha!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸

      @guppygb6078@guppygb6078Ай бұрын
    • Huh? Love for Biden administration?? Are you kidding? Worst approval rating in the history of presidents! 😄 Not to mention most lefties actually consider our beautiful flag "triggering" now. So....🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

      @mav2553@mav2553Ай бұрын
    • @@guppygb6078 god I hope that’s sarcasm.

      @TheRobe-@TheRobe-Ай бұрын
    • @@TheRobe- Nope. You should fly the flag too. I put it on my truck so everyone knows that Biden is the BOSS. 🇺🇸

      @guppygb6078@guppygb6078Ай бұрын
  • “Rotary Gatling gun” yes

    @TyrannoJoris_Rex@TyrannoJoris_RexАй бұрын
    • Now I'm imagining six gatling cannons mounted to a backplate with its own spinning motor

      @tothemaxx1991@tothemaxx1991Ай бұрын
    • @@tothemaxx1991 omg yes, the gatling gatling gun

      @SirNobleIZH@SirNobleIZHАй бұрын
    • Rotary machine gun is more accurate. But we love the 1800s reference.

      @dannybryant6873@dannybryant6873Ай бұрын
    • @@dannybryant6873 Rotary cannon

      @TyrannoJoris_Rex@TyrannoJoris_RexАй бұрын
    • ​@@tothemaxx1991the legendary, and thus far only theoretical "radial galling gun."

      @musewolfman@musewolfmanАй бұрын
  • WW2 Old school pilots: Ra ta ta ta ta ta ta Modern fighter Jets: BRRRRRRRRRRRRR!

    @boogieboss@boogieboss27 күн бұрын
  • Your dedication and hard work are paying off.

    @WinniSmollett@WinniSmollett11 күн бұрын
  • COD Warzone did an amazing job replicating that iconic sound. Even in the game it has a trademark sound.

    @crosses101@crosses101Ай бұрын
  • 20mm are a lot of things but tiny isn't one of them..

    @artisresistance816@artisresistance816Ай бұрын
    • Got it; this is about aircraft but on a battleship the 20mm Oerlikons are pretty tiny upside the 40mm Bofors, 3" AA guns, 5" secondaries and 14" WWI or 16" WWII main guns.

      @David-hm9ic@David-hm9icАй бұрын
  • Both the AC-130A and AC-130H "Spectre" Gunship had 2 of these left side of the Fuselage.

    @2-Hands@2-Hands11 күн бұрын
  • The F4E had one of those...It has three seconds of fire but those three seconds are impressive!

    @lestercoons3962@lestercoons3962Ай бұрын
  • I get the pleasure of hearing this multiple times a week. My neighborhood is near two bomb ranges in the swamp. I can hear them circle around then it gets quiet for a second then BRRRRRRR. It never gets old.

    @ICUP570@ICUP570Ай бұрын
  • I heavily prefer the m61 over the gau8 in terms of sound because it sounds hella aggressive and not so much like a fart

    @pro_gemer@pro_gemerАй бұрын
    • Fires faster too in part because it's electrically fired and not percussion like the A-10. Also, M61A1 use hard brass vs aluminum for the GAU-8.

      @janus3555@janus3555Ай бұрын
    • GAU-8 does not sound like a fart when you hear it in person. Sounds more like thunder.

      @Novusod@NovusodАй бұрын
  • Predator: ol’ painless is waiting. A-10: ol’ you ain’t never gonna find out.

    @trevorjames4619@trevorjames461926 күн бұрын
  • 120mm rounds per second? That is probably better than an A-10 for air support!!! KATOOM, KATOOM, KATOOM, KATOOM!! :D

    @demetrioruivo9364@demetrioruivo936416 сағат бұрын
  • Dude. That is an awesome sound.

    @antiisocial@antiisocialАй бұрын
  • *If your close enough to use that GUN* then you're too close.

    @johnsmith1953x@johnsmith1953xАй бұрын
    • not if you're helping on a CAS mission

      @zedwpd@zedwpdАй бұрын
    • well if you are following a slow cruise missile sometimes you can intercept without needing to use several hundred thousand dollar missiles to do what a few hundred bucks worth of ammo will do instead. also you might want that missile to deal with a jet rather than a largely defenseless cruise missile. *edit* or drone

      @dominuslogik484@dominuslogik484Ай бұрын
  • If an engineer names something "F-", you know it's gonna be good.

    @bboi1489@bboi148919 күн бұрын
  • That has the same terrifying sound as Godzilla! 🥶😱😨😰

    @Davethreshold@DavethresholdАй бұрын
KZhead