Churchill and Roosevelt's Gentlemen's Agreement | Warlords | Timeline

2024 ж. 5 Мам.
2 989 585 Рет қаралды

An examination of the mental battles waged between 20th-century leaders Winston Churchill and Franklin D Roosevelt during the first two years of their relationship. A duel of false promises, evasion and delusion ensued, which was far removed from the more familiar image of friendship and loyalty. World War II was not only a military conflict. It was also a series of private psychological battles waged by the four great leaders: Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Franklin Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. In these mental duels, the 'warlords' lied, schemed, charmed, flattered and cheated to win.
It's like Netflix for history... Sign up to History Hit, the world's best history documentary service, at a huge discount using the code 'TIMELINE' ---ᐳ bit.ly/3a7ambu
You can find more from us on:
/ timelinewh
/ timelinewh
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. Any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com

Пікірлер
  • Sign up to History Hit with code 'timeline' for 80% off bit.ly/TimelineSignUp

    @TimelineChannel@TimelineChannel4 жыл бұрын
    • Just watched a wack of Herman gorring vids... Churchill and Herman look like family...

      @saskoilersfan@saskoilersfan3 жыл бұрын
    • ⁰0

      @antonioroldan9432@antonioroldan94323 жыл бұрын
    • @@saskoilersfan a BBC ba BBC Cv BBC h BBC

      @clevelandbenbarnett3507@clevelandbenbarnett35073 жыл бұрын
    • Ummmm... hate to pull up on facts... but 34.15 in it says Churchill spoke to Queen Elizabeth... sorry to say but she didn't become the Queen until her Father died in early 1952.

      @PB-bu1ti@PB-bu1ti3 жыл бұрын
    • @@PB-bu1ti I believe the reference was to King George VI’s wife, Queen Elizabeth, mother of Elizabeth I, the current monarch.

      @charlesfernandez4493@charlesfernandez44933 жыл бұрын
  • As Churchill said: “You can always count on Americans to do the right thing, after they’ve tried everything else.”

    @Laker62282@Laker622823 жыл бұрын
    • Lol so true

      @KDH-br6hy@KDH-br6hy3 жыл бұрын
    • @@uwuweweweainyatueweweweugw3085 What are you talking about? The Biden administration is not advocating for socialism. Both the Republican and Democratic parties are staunch capitalists.

      @Laker62282@Laker622823 жыл бұрын
    • @@uwuweweweainyatueweweweugw3085 Yes, I’m quite sure.

      @Laker62282@Laker622823 жыл бұрын
    • @@Laker62282 don't listen to him he don't understand u.s. politics even as a US citizen

      @KDH-br6hy@KDH-br6hy3 жыл бұрын
    • @@Laker62282, Idiot! Lol

      @terry4137@terry41373 жыл бұрын
  • I can almost imagine Churchill tossing the cane aside & doing cartwheels once news of the attack on Pearl Harbor broke out.

    @Tam0de@Tam0de3 жыл бұрын
    • God knows you deserve this (with Portuguese subtitles to aid comprehension of real, British, English - with not so much as a hint of American Speak in yer earh'ole): kzhead.info/sun/ksaQZNp9pmN8Z30/bejne.html

      @BogushCh@BogushCh3 жыл бұрын
    • Give me spam my family is starving

      @derpynerdy6294@derpynerdy62943 жыл бұрын
    • @@osamabinladen824 Osama, you're a Muslim, you don't eat pork. And you're also dead.

      @Tam0de@Tam0de3 жыл бұрын
    • drank one bottle of scotch with one sip

      @Rihardololz@Rihardololz3 жыл бұрын
    • Lmfo you made my day lol

      @eliascastro4948@eliascastro49482 жыл бұрын
  • Legend says Churchill is still asking for the 40 destroyers

    @akshatsrivastava4280@akshatsrivastava42802 жыл бұрын
    • That 99 years still has some time to run.

      @kiwitrainguy@kiwitrainguy2 жыл бұрын
    • To be fair , if u want something of value , make a bid for something more valuable automatically makes whatever u ask for next seem cheaper

      @BipoIarbear@BipoIarbear2 жыл бұрын
    • Churchill is died so I doubt it, but I did hear he mentioned it on his death bed.

      @skylerspringsteen5730@skylerspringsteen57302 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂 will be 200 years old before he gets them

      @robmidgley9385@robmidgley93852 жыл бұрын
    • @@BipoIarbear Yeah, that's negotiating 101.

      @krashd@krashd2 жыл бұрын
  • Basically Churchill going “notice me Senpai” for a year and a half while Roosevelt played politics

    @BatTCK@BatTCK3 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣🤣🤣

      @thephoenix1767@thephoenix17672 жыл бұрын
    • And then Japan went real "notice me senpai" with Pearl Harbor

      @pawefornalik6638@pawefornalik66382 жыл бұрын
    • Germany and japan played it too

      @thephoenix1767@thephoenix17672 жыл бұрын
    • @Chandler White that's correct!!!

      @eglysbroslat2885@eglysbroslat28852 жыл бұрын
    • @Chandler White not even close. FDR knew that if the UK collapsed, the USA was to be next on the "conquered list." A guarantee of victory was a UK, USA and Russia Line up

      @glennpickard2239@glennpickard22392 жыл бұрын
  • I always wonder how important it was that Roosevelt was completely fluent in German from his youth and knew Germany very well and could hear Hitler's speeches without translation and catch the fanaticism and danger

    @stuartshapiro6626@stuartshapiro66263 жыл бұрын
    • Your post supports something I once read: that years before the War, Roosevelt had said privately that the English translation of _Mein Kampf_ was so completely bowdlerized that its readers would not recognize how dangerous Hilter was.

      @JimSmithInChiapas@JimSmithInChiapas3 жыл бұрын
    • @@JimSmithInChiapas v. V. Im

      @frankscobie2489@frankscobie24892 жыл бұрын
    • Wow did not know FDR was fluent in German. Always luv pictures where Americans turn out to cheer FDR. I've always thought FDR's decision to build Dams in the west, contributed to making California a major war producer.

      @roberthanshe4372@roberthanshe43722 жыл бұрын
    • It was very important he didn’t need people to take forever and translate he could do it himself. I think all presidents should be fluent in 2 languages 1 English and the second whatever is going on in the world at there term. Whether it be Russian Chinese or whatever the Middle East speaks.

      @NightRider938@NightRider9382 жыл бұрын
    • Wow, that’s crazy imma look into that! I had no idea

      @natedb99@natedb992 жыл бұрын
  • Sounds exactly like a modern day long distance, internet relationship.

    @Ferlius93@Ferlius933 жыл бұрын
    • like me and one of my lovers (I'm Churchill).

      @dying101666@dying1016663 жыл бұрын
    • Well written

      @Viidarr13@Viidarr133 жыл бұрын
    • There's a little known cable that goes: Roosevelt: Get woke Winnie Churchill: ROFL My Empire, my rules

      @Baddhamster@Baddhamster3 жыл бұрын
    • Best comment to ever

      @godschild8756@godschild87563 жыл бұрын
    • Her: "Hey baby, I'll be over and treat you right" Me: Has another drink

      @goldflyknows@goldflyknows3 жыл бұрын
  • When it was announced on 04.12.1945 that Roosevelt had died at age 63, Churchill shut himself into his bedroom for 3 days. He was known to be an emotional man, and maybe letting it out was the better way. Churchill lived to be 90 - died in January, 1965.

    @collinsje5@collinsje52 жыл бұрын
    • He looked old when he was young though. Weird.

      @anthonyfuqua6988@anthonyfuqua6988 Жыл бұрын
    • @@anthonyfuqua6988 war will do that to a man

      @michaelcostello1053@michaelcostello1053 Жыл бұрын
    • @@michaelcostello1053 I watched the PBS documentary about him and he seemed to age rapidly after the infantile paralysis (polio) onset. I was equally astounded at how Ealonor was treated and how she ended up. Ealanor should've ended up in an insane asylum the way she was treated by her parents but ended up strong. Everyone knows their marriage was open but they were good for each other.

      @anthonyfuqua6988@anthonyfuqua6988 Жыл бұрын
    • Interesting observation: I’ve long found it ironic that the oldest of the Big Three was simultaneously the one who lived the longest, as well as the one whose nation lost the most in terms of global power as a result of the war.

      @charliefreeman947@charliefreeman9473 ай бұрын
  • I was brought up to believe Churchill and Roosevelt were best buds. I was shocked when I learnt the truth in the 1990s.

    @micksherman7709@micksherman7709 Жыл бұрын
    • I was always given that opinion as well, that Roosevelt was kept from being aggressive because of powerful isolationist factions within the US. This paints a very different picture.

      @willmpet@willmpet Жыл бұрын
    • Roosevelt was no friend, but he was also no enemy, rather indifferent to anything which didn't immediately affect him or the US.

      @johnausten8161@johnausten8161 Жыл бұрын
    • Statesmanship Is TEXAS HOLD EM UNDER advice from The real money.

      @davidlarson2505@davidlarson2505 Жыл бұрын
    • The ocean MEETING IS FDR balls INTENTIONS.

      @davidlarson2505@davidlarson2505 Жыл бұрын
    • Friends These calamity's that are going on around the world will lead to a Sunday Law Which will The Mark Of The Beast, Those that keep Gods seventh day sabbath will be prohibited from buying and sell and persecuted. Jesus is coming are you ready?

      @raheemallen2003@raheemallen2003 Жыл бұрын
  • This is the most complex bromance I've ever heard of.

    @mr.epicmemerman131@mr.epicmemerman1313 жыл бұрын
    • We are allies not friends and Churchills mother was American

      @colleta2400@colleta24002 жыл бұрын
  • I love World history in general but am always drawn in by WW2 and the psychological "games" of the world leaders of that time. The lies, manipulation, ignorance, pride, etc of ALL parties... It's a "miracle" the world survived. Carry on history nerds. ❤️

    @Adrian-zd4cs@Adrian-zd4cs4 жыл бұрын
    • The world did not survive. It died. World War One and World War two, only made the world more sophisticated and thus enabled it to march more efficiently, towards a world government. Please read about the role of big corporations. On top of that, today they have beefed up China. Hence, a war between the united states, perhaps even NATO and China, is not unrealistic.

      @ThePRCommander@ThePRCommander3 жыл бұрын
    • @@ThePRCommander It did help advanced our world and I'm thankful for both world wars

      @derpynerdy6294@derpynerdy62943 жыл бұрын
    • @@derpynerdy6294 Our world meaning what exactly? The industrialised world or the entire planet? Apart from that, I am confident that very few people feel like you. Especially the victims of both wars.

      @ThePRCommander@ThePRCommander3 жыл бұрын
    • @@ThePRCommander Well its done, what can you do to change the past, I enjoy the very lifestyle and technology we have Since the wright brothers plane to jet engines in the span of 60 years, in a single generation

      @derpynerdy6294@derpynerdy62943 жыл бұрын
    • The world wars show how far mankind has evolved into a violence it can't direct away from itself unless it should be attacked from the stars. The world as it is mirrors us exactly. We can dream and fantasize, but reality will always call us back. Perhaps we can find some comfort in the assumption that a peaceful world would be a world without life. This is what an evolutionary victory looks like.

      @jant.carlsson5061@jant.carlsson50613 жыл бұрын
  • I never knew the US presidency saw Soviet dominance as a salvation rather than a threat at first. These timeline documentaries are so revelating!

    @jorisboonekamp9038@jorisboonekamp90382 жыл бұрын
    • Our media at the time loved the USSR. Few people had any idea just how evil it was.

      @michaelhearne3289@michaelhearne3289 Жыл бұрын
    • Churchill knew before FDR did of Stalin's plan to take over all the countries he got to Communism

      @alanaadams7440@alanaadams744011 ай бұрын
    • The Soviets were heavily financed by the U.S. during the war and the Soviets even flew a few American made Aircraft. The U.S. has always favored bank rolling wars to fighting them and in this respect the U.S. got the Soviets to throw away millions of their soldiers lives while America continued to keep her youth safe from war.

      @luminescentlion@luminescentlion5 ай бұрын
    • Soviet domination of Eastern Europe pacified western Europe and bring them under US influence aka NATO. Also destroyed British Empire, Forced all imperialist nations to liberate the colonies leading to USA being only powerful nation. Roosevelt was 100% right in his goals for American dominance

      @Manikanta-hh7wp@Manikanta-hh7wp20 күн бұрын
  • Yeah, I mean anyone who knows WW2 well, knows that Britain had to give up a LOT to get help from the US, even though it was in the United States' best interest to help Britain fight. FDR was smart, and played his hand well. Churchill had to have been under enormous pressure the whole time.

    @gr8guitarplayer@gr8guitarplayer2 жыл бұрын
    • Roosevelt could not give charity to Britain. It would have put power into his political enemies hands to use against him. Otherwise he would have gladly done so. Behind the scenes he was actively committed to doing everything he could to get us into the war. The will of the people be damned.

      @michaelhearne3289@michaelhearne3289 Жыл бұрын
    • FDR was a devious man. Always with an eye to the main chance even to the possible detriment of the world.

      @paperclip612@paperclip612 Жыл бұрын
    • And Churchill out lived FDR

      @alanaadams7440@alanaadams744011 ай бұрын
  • *"Nations that go down fighting, rise up again. Those that surrender tamely, are finished. "* _SIR WINSTON CHURCHILL_

    @glennhoddle10@glennhoddle105 жыл бұрын
    • (yawns in Hindi... )

      @VersusARCH@VersusARCH5 жыл бұрын
    • such as the Netherlands?

      @corribean1@corribean15 жыл бұрын
    • maybe if you wasn't yawning so much the British wouldn't have took over India for 200 years

      @davehoward22@davehoward225 жыл бұрын
    • Glenn Hoddle i wonder how Churchill lived so long since everyone seems to think he was a drunk. He also painted some beautiful pictures after he was retired

      @janblackman3320@janblackman33205 жыл бұрын
    • @Jesus Christ your a tool

      @miller000killer@miller000killer4 жыл бұрын
  • Is it me or is this channel one of the best war documentary channels? Almost every video is exciting/educational and has unseen footage. Subbed

    @vaux_manvv7520@vaux_manvv75204 жыл бұрын
    • It is you.

      @slavatkachenko408@slavatkachenko4084 жыл бұрын
    • @@slavatkachenko408 hahaha

      @krixpop@krixpop3 жыл бұрын
    • It's fantastic

      @sampuatisamuel9785@sampuatisamuel97853 жыл бұрын
    • They are excellent, and hope they continue to make more documentaries like this

      @adamfrost3139@adamfrost31392 жыл бұрын
    • And it's on the internet, ..so it must be true!

      @BST-lm4po@BST-lm4po2 жыл бұрын
  • My parents, to their dying days, always believed that Roosevelt knew beforehand that Japan was going to strike Pearl Harbor and allowed it to happen, with the huge loss of American lives, in order to be able to declare war and enter World War II. According to them, most Americans felt the same way. Daddy went in the next day, Dec 8th, to volunteer to serve. Due to his age and medical history he had to fight to be allowed to serve and he never got to go overseas, which he was embarrassed about his entire life. That was a major difference between WWII and when I served, in Vietnam. In WWII, most men wanted to serve their nation. During Vietnam a sizable number of men were willing to do whatever they could to avoid serving, even leave the US and go to Canada.

    @genataylor460@genataylor4602 жыл бұрын
    • WW2 was much more clearly a necessary conflict.

      @caelachyt@caelachyt2 жыл бұрын
    • I think it had a different weight. WWII had reached America with Pearl Harbour, with real people dying on American soil. Before the cold war. Vietnam and the "police-action" in Korea did not and came with a different "justification", a different reasoning. Yes, most wars are explained to the public by saying something about freedom, way of life, gods will etc, but it has a different feel to it, if it is in the context of people dying on hometurf, or not. And the price in blood of WWII was still fresher in memory, when Vietnam happened. I am sorry, if I sound judgemental, it is not intentional, but I am not a native speaker, so I am not sure how to phrase it better.

      @leandrobravo3319@leandrobravo33192 жыл бұрын
    • Props to your dad. He was like James Stewart, had to push to be allowed in the front lines. Unlike John Wayne. Which of them featured in WW2 films afterwards? The reality of the Nazis going over the Atlantic was more tangible. There was their foolish attempt at drawing in Mexico. Vietnam on the other hand, was far and miniscule. It was harder to convince people that impoverished farmers fighting for their independence were a direct threat to the USA. The theory that Roosevelt knew about Japan's impending attack is pretty much debunked by this video. It is possible that some intelligence or suspicion that it might happen. But I doubt he would know for certain and did nothing. It's too much of a political risk if you discount the immense effort he put in keeping America out of the war. Vietnam on the other hand, the false flag operation to justify the start of a shooting war was pretty much exposed.

      @logon235@logon2352 жыл бұрын
    • That's correct///

      @eglysbroslat2885@eglysbroslat28852 жыл бұрын
    • To be fair, though, most of those avoiding conscription in Vietnam believed they were serving their nation better by refusing to go to an unjust and unwinnable war. And they were probably right.

      @kenoliver8913@kenoliver89132 жыл бұрын
  • The story of India and WW2 is so complicated and very under appreciated. Edit: timeline please do a video on the role of India in WW2. The good, bad and the ugly. The world needs to know.

    @AD-wx5nz@AD-wx5nz2 жыл бұрын
    • Greatness of Great Britain is that they are always ungrateful. We helped Britain in both world wars they have spent billions as it was their money. Britain expressed their gratitude by killing 4.2 million people. Churchil is responsible for this famine. He was a diabolique person.

      @hemalatharajesh3227@hemalatharajesh3227 Жыл бұрын
    • It is indeed interesting. Men fighting for the British and also men fighting the British with aid from Japan and Germany for freedom.

      @train_xc@train_xc9 ай бұрын
    • In two World Wars, 162K Indian soldiers died fighting for the British, around 87K in WW2. By some records, a million plus Indian soldiers fought in WW2. Indian nationalist Subhas Chandra Bose had taken exile in Germany. In later stages of the war, he fought the British in Eastern India using Japanese help. This was for independence of India from the British and unrelated to other war goals of Japanese or Axis powers. His army called Indian National Army consisted soldiers from other South Asian countries as well. Eventually British were able to defeat them. But INA later inspired a Naval mutiny in Bombay in 1946 which accelerated the demise of British Empire in India. Before this in 1942, Congress (Indian party) leaders had started the Quit India Movement, they were promptly jailed by the British. However this was a nationwide movement which posed the biggest challenge to British in India since 1857. After this in 1945, first time Labor Party in Britain had promised full independence for India (which eventually happened in August 1947). During the Quit India Movement, British had kil led 15000 mostly non-violent protesters. During the naval mutiny, British had kil led 400.

      @amols101@amols1016 ай бұрын
  • Only thing this really missed was the counterbalance regarding events with Japan. Japan is not even mentioned until Pearl Harbor. An important aspect of Roosevelt's mindset and perhaps elusiveness.

    @varthelm@varthelm3 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah. If they committed to Europe and then got blindsided by Japan, and Roosevelt walked them into it...

      @Stormcrownn@Stormcrownn2 жыл бұрын
    • Good point!

      @BigBoss-sm9xj@BigBoss-sm9xj2 жыл бұрын
    • Especially given its importance as to Roosevelt’s postering and whether he was trying to contain fascism diplomatically, or gearing up for war. Roosevelt’s approach to Japan was much more aggressive than Europe with his sanctions and essentially starving Japan of oil. Japan either had to give up on 10 years of progress in China or go to war.

      @Thelionpaladin@Thelionpaladin2 жыл бұрын
    • In 1903 Roosevelt met a Japanese student at Yale who frankly informed him of Japan's future plans to dominate Asia!

      @josephkemler5668@josephkemler56682 жыл бұрын
    • Japan was already fighting its own war in China. Bringing it in perhaps would have distracted from the focus on Churchill's and Roosevelt's relationship.

      @logon235@logon2352 жыл бұрын
  • *WWII happens” USA: just when I think I’m out they drag me back in!

    @charlemagne996@charlemagne9964 жыл бұрын
    • Charles B. . Anti semite.

      @christsrevenge8030@christsrevenge80304 жыл бұрын
    • Lol....

      @marcoAKAjoe@marcoAKAjoe4 жыл бұрын
    • @@christsrevenge8030 lol

      @saphired02@saphired024 жыл бұрын
    • *WWII happens" USA: just when I think I'm out they drag me back in! Siiiggghhh! OK World hold my beer and watch this...... Again!

      @stlbusker3025@stlbusker30254 жыл бұрын
    • Exactly,, then after America helps and all the dust settles all the countries go back to blaming America again

      @notebook2876@notebook28764 жыл бұрын
  • These documentaries are excellent. I know a good amount of history and I always end up learning more through these. This narrative is also really damn good. No over emotional pronunciation and calmness.

    @shabberplasm32@shabberplasm322 жыл бұрын
  • Honestly as a British man myself, just listening to the in depth, behind the scenes relationship between America and Britain during WW2... it's not as comfortable as school and/or your friends and family like to project it was

    @joshuasaunders7260@joshuasaunders72602 жыл бұрын
    • And as an American myself I always thought America and Great Britain were always Allies and on good terms didn’t matter which country went to war atleast they always had each other’s backs at all costs

      @zupremetv8618@zupremetv86182 жыл бұрын
    • The alliance was not designed to be Comfortable. It was total War to the death for the losers, the allied leaders understood this first and foremost !

      @glennpickard2239@glennpickard22392 жыл бұрын
    • FDR always had an eye on his main chance. I think k he might well have joined the Axis powers had Japan no attacked Pearl Harbour.

      @paperclip612@paperclip612 Жыл бұрын
    • @@paperclip612 Never. The United States would have never joined the Axis. We long since gave up an semblance of neutrality prior to Pearl Harbor which the commentator seems to downplay somewhat. There is no way that the American people would have consented for our Govt to join the Axis. That line is British propaganda touted today and is simply baseless.

      @leadwipe@leadwipe Жыл бұрын
  • FDR: "We have nothing to fear but fear itself." "And spiders." "Well that goes without saying."

    @Amadeus8484@Amadeus84845 жыл бұрын
    • and polio virus i assume...

      @TheEriegpman@TheEriegpman4 жыл бұрын
    • @@TheEriegpman lol!

      @marcoAKAjoe@marcoAKAjoe4 жыл бұрын
    • Don't forget snakes.

      @winstonchurchill3597@winstonchurchill35974 жыл бұрын
    • Yea, did he say that to the thousands of people who died in the Bataan death march? Reminds me of the idiots who say, regarding covid, "we will get thru this toghether",,,oh yea? YOu gonna put that on the tombstone of the hundreds of thousands who have died?

      @BP7BlackPearl@BP7BlackPearl3 жыл бұрын
    • I fear nothing but spiders

      @cheesestake4906@cheesestake49063 жыл бұрын
  • This is without a doubt the single greatest documentary series on WWII. I find myself watching it again and again. Just a wonderful piece in all regards.

    @MrRiley-Is-Not-Amused@MrRiley-Is-Not-Amused3 жыл бұрын
    • Can't you just subscribe and watch quietly the video, without socking the cuck. Thank you

      @chmatacek@chmatacek2 жыл бұрын
    • @@chmatacek tf is ur problem

      @POTUS118@POTUS1182 жыл бұрын
    • @@POTUS118 yeah why doesn’t he turn the other cheek

      @peter96844@peter968442 жыл бұрын
    • @@chmatacek I don't recall reading that in the Gospels or the Sermon on the Mount

      @bigwoody4704@bigwoody47042 жыл бұрын
  • Fascinating documentary provides a rare insight into Roosevelt’s mind and strategic planning.

    @jiqbal1uk@jiqbal1uk2 жыл бұрын
    • if there was one thing Roosevelt was doing, it was playing chess with the entire world. and he won. too bad he was also one of the biggest commie presidents of the USA to tarnish his ww2 exploits

      @davidanalyst671@davidanalyst671 Жыл бұрын
    • He doesn't come up roses

      @lisbetsoda4874@lisbetsoda4874 Жыл бұрын
  • Note when the narrator said Churchill spoke to “Queen Elizabeth”, he was either referring to Queen Elizabeth, The Queen Mother. Queen Elizabeth II was a Princess at the time.

    @terminallumbago6465@terminallumbago64652 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent series. Produced so well, from the voice-over work to blending in historical footage. Hats off, folks.

    @jumpinjakeflash1@jumpinjakeflash14 жыл бұрын
    • Produced with Lies

      @janephillips3627@janephillips3627 Жыл бұрын
    • @@janephillips3627 can you elaborate

      @jryecart8017@jryecart8017 Жыл бұрын
    • @@jryecart8017 and what a strange documentary to be trying to push conspiracies on, too. I've been binging these and there are ones about Iraq, Panama, Mao and China, The USSR, the Sino-Indian border conflict, but they're calling BS on Churchill and FDR not getting along too well?

      @mitchellgiles6869@mitchellgiles6869 Жыл бұрын
  • Churchill read Stalin and USSR so well. Roosevelt was naive but played the game out of US interest.

    @theclaws141@theclaws1415 жыл бұрын
    • No. They played a good cop bad cop game with Stalin who paid little attention to it as he knew how many divisions each country has on the ground...

      @VersusARCH@VersusARCH5 жыл бұрын
    • @Tom Clark Mel Gibson has joined the chat.

      @foxycinnamon7307@foxycinnamon73074 жыл бұрын
    • @@Wo_9 Roy Cohn came close, & Kissinger.

      @foxycinnamon7307@foxycinnamon73074 жыл бұрын
    • @Tom Clark I think you got that confused with the Narnia Chronicles: The Last Battle. Spoiler alert: Aslan takes everyone to a bigger, better Narnia. The dwarves are the isolationists.

      @foxycinnamon7307@foxycinnamon73074 жыл бұрын
    • Why did Roosevelt then say "Germany first" after THE JAPANESE attacked Pearl Harbor ?

      @bobanderson6874@bobanderson68744 жыл бұрын
  • I think this documentary clearly shows that both Roosevelt and Churchill were consummate politicians who represented the best interests of their own nations. It was in Churchill's best interest to drag the United States into the war. It was in Roosevelt's best interest to avoid sending America's youth into yet another European war. I would expect nothing less from either. Where Churchill did succeed was in getting Roosevelt to adopt the "Europe First" policy when it came to executing the war. Since it was Japan's attack the dragged America into the war, it would be quite reasonable to expect the US to focus on Japan first, tossing a few scraps towards Europe as they came available.

    @kevinm.8682@kevinm.86822 жыл бұрын
    • Actually Roosevelt was quite willing to send Americans overseas to fight. Just not at the cost of his political power. The USA was very isolationist at the time and he was skating on thin ice as it was.

      @michaelhearne3289@michaelhearne3289 Жыл бұрын
    • Roosevelt must be an embarrassment for you Americans. What a coward snake he was.

      @hackett152332@hackett1523327 ай бұрын
  • that was one of the best WW2 docs I have ever consumed. I want a part two to finish out the war.

    @FattrTV@FattrTV2 жыл бұрын
  • If Churchil gave up, there is a good chance that the whole of Europe would be speaking German.

    @marcomongke3116@marcomongke31163 жыл бұрын
    • That thought makes me nut 🤤

      @cprow0997@cprow09973 жыл бұрын
    • Are you German?

      @vicvega4415@vicvega44153 жыл бұрын
    • They still would have been owned by Russia. The USA landed on Normandy when the bulk of the german army was already weakened by the Russians

      @SvPVids@SvPVids3 жыл бұрын
    • @@SvPVids the main reason why Germany lost both WW is bc they were fighting two-fronts war. There was a period of “negotiations” where Germany tried to negotiate out a deal with England before they started attacking Russia. If England were to say yes, the war on the western front is basically over. Without England, the axis power wouldn’t have to split their troops to both fronts therefore increasing the chance of them winning the WW2.

      @atapylaothongdee@atapylaothongdee3 жыл бұрын
    • Russian, actually.

      @Chaiserzose@Chaiserzose3 жыл бұрын
  • “ I shall drag in the United States.” 🤣

    @Maaarrina@Maaarrina4 жыл бұрын
    • *I SHALL DRAG IN THE UNITED STATES* - _zoomed in face of Winston Churchill, 1940_

      @geebeedee9509@geebeedee95094 жыл бұрын
    • Lol is this a real quote??

      @B1UExN1NJA@B1UExN1NJA3 жыл бұрын
    • Skipsla yer 2:54 🙂

      @Maaarrina@Maaarrina3 жыл бұрын
    • "You can always trust the Americans to do the right thing.. once all other alternatives are exhausted" Churchill

      @Thomas...191@Thomas...1913 жыл бұрын
    • You can bet your boots on that partner!

      @johnzeszutko5661@johnzeszutko56613 жыл бұрын
  • Best documentary, I've seen on one of the most pivotal relationships in history.

    @jaydalypt2706@jaydalypt27062 жыл бұрын
  • How ironic is it that when Churchill said if you don't strike first they will after we've gone under, and 7 months later Churchill's words came true when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor.

    @deltaboy767@deltaboy767 Жыл бұрын
  • was it really just 48 minutes? It is so densely packed full of information. Even me learned something new! changed my point of views.

    @michaelmuller6890@michaelmuller68904 жыл бұрын
  • "I don't think we need worry about any possibility of Russian dominance" that was Roosevelt's biggest mistake. He never seemed to understand the threat Stalin posed and it would lead to the cold war.

    @Jamie95326@Jamie953264 жыл бұрын
    • I wish Cold War lasted long Because Race means arms race Arms race means Inventions Inventions mean New technology New technology means STAR WARS!! my dream of space ships

      @comradedyatlov2010@comradedyatlov20103 жыл бұрын
    • As long as Roosevelt lived he was correct. The issue became an issue because Roosevelt never took into account that though he was the youngest, his health was the most compromised. FDR never brought Truman into the inner circle and like the rest of the country believed FDR and Churchill were very tight and of one mind. They were close but Roosevelt had his own mind and agenda. And it had nothing to do with underwriting the British Empire

      @philipcone357@philipcone3573 жыл бұрын
    • The western allies should have negotiated with the USSR to leave eastern Europe and promising the soviets that Europe from oder river would have been a neutral demilitarised zone. The west should given them Finland and manchuria if the Soviets really wanted some compensation . Stalin note was proof that Soviets only wanted a buffer zone and had no interest in ruling eastern Europe. This is the same deal which ended the cold war in 1990 when the west agreed that NATO wouldnt expand beyond a reunited Germany but the only problem is that NATO didnt keep its promise of not expanding and now america has to defend frankly speaking useless nations of eastern europe and contain china in the pacific at the same time.

      @KillerofWestoids@KillerofWestoids2 жыл бұрын
  • Great video, thank you for this

    @southerncross86@southerncross862 жыл бұрын
  • The fundamental problem was that FDR wanted to dismantle the system of empire, while Churchill wanted to preserve it. They weren’t really on the same side.

    @ianshaver8954@ianshaver8954 Жыл бұрын
  • I think Churchill was a drunk. On the upside, maybe that was a good thing, to stand basically alone like he did against the Nazis, I suppose, you would need to be a drunk.

    @p3tr0114@p3tr01145 жыл бұрын
    • Some of the worlds greatest people were drunks. Churchill,hemmingway,kennedys,my father,my brother to name a few.

      @moniks2849@moniks28495 жыл бұрын
    • He was British it's in the blood

      @davehoward22@davehoward225 жыл бұрын
    • You understand who was behind the drunken stooge don't you ?

      @organicdudranch@organicdudranch5 жыл бұрын
    • @Jesus Christ Its not all alcohol, they breast feed them with tity beer

      @anglojojo@anglojojo5 жыл бұрын
    • @@moniks2849 lmao. "My father, brother"...

      @iExcIuded@iExcIuded4 жыл бұрын
  • Ah the comment section. I’ll scroll down and amuse myself for a bit.

    @merlottime1794@merlottime17945 жыл бұрын
    • Why torture yourself?

      @davehann8178@davehann81785 жыл бұрын
    • It's the reason I love dogs.

      @raymondcheek2880@raymondcheek28805 жыл бұрын
    • Ikr its like they all knew the men personally

      @DJVEGAS1000@DJVEGAS10005 жыл бұрын
    • +Merlot Time Yeas of course! You know best and people who think differently are idiots.

      @strikerorwell9232@strikerorwell92324 жыл бұрын
    • it`s all either uneducated troll armchair would be fascist dictators wallowing in their own self hatred and psychopathic pity or glorification of the beautiful transcendental reflection of a perfect world with daisies and rainbows raining on puppies playing on fresh green grass with candy canes and sweet chocolates as a billion kids starve to death in the 3rd world..gee I`m glad I got that off my shoulders

      @dougthompson5586@dougthompson55864 жыл бұрын
  • Great original footage; nice voiceover. at 00:10:14 Churchill and Britain were not fighting alone. Over 2million Indian troops were fighting all over the Middle East and N. Africa. Canadian, NZ, Aussie, Polish, S. African etc. were also fighting. Churchill opposed D-Day till the day it happened, he pushed for Italy and Crete and the Balkans. From Gallipoli to Market Garden his fingerprints are all over every single military disaster.

    @GSteel-rh9iu@GSteel-rh9iu Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks for noting contributions of colonial era British troops. Around 160K Indian soldiers died fighting for the British in World Wars 1 and 2, and I am sure tens of thousands from other countries occupied by British as well. These documentaries often fail to make any mention of their sacrifices.

      @amols101@amols1016 ай бұрын
  • Delay is the deadliest form of carelessness.

    @leedamato1597@leedamato15972 жыл бұрын
  • This was amazing. Thank you.

    @MasterKoala777@MasterKoala7774 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent perspective, very intimate.

    @kaarlimakela3413@kaarlimakela34135 жыл бұрын
  • Superb documentary, good continuation!

    @Cromwelldunbar@Cromwelldunbar Жыл бұрын
  • 2:54 I DIED at that master plan Churchill had 😂😂😂

    @drunkenn1nja@drunkenn1nja2 ай бұрын
  • Thank you for creating such videos !!

    @pratibhasingh7684@pratibhasingh76843 жыл бұрын
  • All countries, particularly the most powerful, unfortunately always act on behalf their own interests even if it means abandoning certain morals and basic principles of humanity and friendship.

    @rickyricardo520@rickyricardo5205 жыл бұрын
    • @Comp Wiz2007 Your missing Ricardo's philosophical point " All countries, particularly the most powerful, unfortunately always act on behalf their own interests even if it means abandoning certain morals and basic principles of humanity and friendship. AND ONLY IDIOTS CALL OTHER PPL STUPID? Idiots like YOU

      @ausendundeinenacht1@ausendundeinenacht14 жыл бұрын
    • TOTALLY RIGHT you are " All countries, particularly the most powerful, unfortunately always act on behalf their own interests even if it means abandoning certain morals and basic principles of humanity and friendship.

      @ausendundeinenacht1@ausendundeinenacht14 жыл бұрын
    • Everyone is missing the point, nobody has mentioned the Stockmarket crash in 1929 leading to the Great Depreasion. FDR's idea was war was good for business and selling weapons would make the US alot of money. Dragging their economy out of the Great Depresion. Creating jobs, saving lives while not risking their own, create a new industry and also ensuring Britain didn't get away with their continued Empire Building around the world. So Churchill had to make concessions to the US. All without comitting a single US soldier. Also, war is good for business.

      @wayneshilcock3027@wayneshilcock30274 жыл бұрын
    • @Comp Wiz2007 Incredible how ignorant of history a fair amount of people are these days. Many today fail to realize the era FDR was governing over; the horrors of WW1 were fresh in the minds of American citizens--heck, The Civil War, for that matter, and they were adamantly and overwhelmingly pacifist at this time.

      @kevinmichael9482@kevinmichael94824 жыл бұрын
    • How do you think those countries got so powerful to begin with? And it is because they had such power that the Axis was stopped. So maybe it's not so clear what is and is not "unfortunate".

      @archonsouthpaw8690@archonsouthpaw86904 жыл бұрын
  • So very interesting. This is the back story of what they thought of each other

    @susangutrugianios2241@susangutrugianios22412 жыл бұрын
  • I do not blame Roosevelt for his strategy. In fact, I found it most intelligent. He remained at the center of the coin in heads or tails between public opinion of his country and the opinion of his ally which is England. He knew that when the time came, and it did, when the coin flipped and public opinion favored the assistance and participation of the US in the war, he could act upon it because he didn't choose a side to begin with. He played his cards right and I admired that.

    @Jomster777@Jomster7772 жыл бұрын
    • I have never understood why Roosevelt played politics while Britain was being crushed and struggling for its very existence. Roosevelt greatly underestimated the courage and willingness to help of the American people. Churchill and the British were made to stand alone against hell's fury for far too long.

      @lynnjohnson4417@lynnjohnson44172 жыл бұрын
    • How worthy of him to sacrifice all those people at Pearl Harbor. He is a criminal that will be judged.

      @larrybedouin2921@larrybedouin2921 Жыл бұрын
    • He was very slick, manipulative and unreliable. Churchill was the greatest leader of the era, in my opinion.

      @billscannell93@billscannell93 Жыл бұрын
    • What if Roosevelt was waiting to see which side was going to win before committing himself? Pearl Harbour forced his hand.

      @paperclip612@paperclip612 Жыл бұрын
    • @@billscannell93 the guy who begged FDR and who was chased out of Europe by the Germans, what a hero!

      @bluemachine1025@bluemachine1025 Жыл бұрын
  • It may be a tiny detail, but Churchill was not First Lord of the Admiralty when Roosevelt visited Europe in 1918, but Minister of Ammunition.

    @bartmann81@bartmann814 жыл бұрын
    • I think his title was Minister of Munitions.

      @simongleaden2864@simongleaden28642 жыл бұрын
  • Great clip of Roosevelt standing when he greets Churchill around 0:20. So much staging and optics in these meetings. It makes you wonder if Churchill knew Roosevelt was unable to walk.

    @chrisbanbury@chrisbanbury3 жыл бұрын
    • its possible that he didnt know. the way he approaches him looks like he was expecting Roosevelt to take a step and shake his hand but Roosevelt was not gonna move

      @IASP17@IASP173 жыл бұрын
  • Thank God for Churchill. He was worth 50 generals, 20 battalions, and 10 Roosevelts.

    @nmr6988@nmr69882 жыл бұрын
    • Totally agree.

      @paperclip612@paperclip612 Жыл бұрын
    • Roosevelt made the American economy better so we had more money to lend.

      @anthonyfuqua6988@anthonyfuqua6988 Жыл бұрын
  • I had no idea Roosevelt was such an isolationist O.o

    @Enthos2@Enthos22 жыл бұрын
    • He was a good politician and he knew where the voters were, despite his own inclinations.

      @SandfordSmythe@SandfordSmythe Жыл бұрын
  • thank you, a very good production

    @shashidharshettar3846@shashidharshettar38463 жыл бұрын
  • WHAT AN AMAZING SERIES OF DOCS We really get to see how they thought The including of letters and voice actors is also really good

    @vivalapalestine7235@vivalapalestine72353 жыл бұрын
  • I always have loved the fact that Winston Churchill told them to stick it...

    @petemiller9972@petemiller99722 жыл бұрын
  • 37:01 idk why but this really puts a smile on my face.

    @Sassywizard@Sassywizard2 жыл бұрын
  • SUCH A GREAT VIDEO!!!

    @matthewexline6589@matthewexline65893 жыл бұрын
  • How could so many ppl dislike this? Of course war is an atrocity but this is the reality all corners of the world were effected by. These events shaped the world we all know to this day.

    @murraygoodhind7691@murraygoodhind76913 жыл бұрын
  • 18:31 Almost brought a tear to my eye. That was beautiful. Especially as a Brit. However... It must have hurt in real time, getting that message only to be left awaiting American help for so long. And even when the help did come, it was not because of a desire to help but due to the blunders of Japan and Germany.

    @HebrewsElevenTwentyFive@HebrewsElevenTwentyFive3 жыл бұрын
    • You can argue that lend-lease was help. But the landing of American troops on Europe soil was almost exclusively out of selfishness. It was to prevent the entirety of Europe falling under Soviet regime.

      @Dennis19901@Dennis199013 жыл бұрын
    • @@Dennis19901 Dennis you do understand that the British wanted to liberate those said area’s for the same reasons right? Stalin literally asked for a second front to be opened. so.

      @AlinaYouTubeVlogs@AlinaYouTubeVlogs3 жыл бұрын
    • @@AlinaKZheadVlogs "the British wanted to liberate those said area’s for the same reasons right?" Factually incorrect. As the British were involved in Battles from their territories and allies both. You must know that they were in France long before America did anything.

      @Dennis19901@Dennis199013 жыл бұрын
    • American's, even today, dont like foreign policy and wars. Only the politicians who get rich off it like foreign wars. I dont like foreign policy so much that I even disagree with foreign aid programs we give to dictatorships. With all our foreign aid we Americans still got illegals at our southern boarder wanting in to destroy our country like they did their own.

      @ryaj2356@ryaj23562 жыл бұрын
    • @@Dennis19901 The Russians would still be walking to the front the USA alone sent 427,000 studebakers,Dodge's,GMC's that were used for transport and for artillary/Shelling. Both Kruschev and Zhukov thanked IKE later when he was President and Stalin was dead

      @bigwoody4704@bigwoody47042 жыл бұрын
  • That was a real eye opener

    @keithwilson9118@keithwilson91182 жыл бұрын
  • Roosevelt was a very cunning and duplicitous politician. He told people what he thought they wanted to hear without every really committing himself to do what they wanted him to do. A very slippery character.

    @syourke3@syourke33 жыл бұрын
    • Yup

      @SandfordSmythe@SandfordSmythe2 ай бұрын
  • I love the music in this episode, it sounds a little like Vaughan William

    @JerrythePope@JerrythePope4 жыл бұрын
  • I never cared to learn about history in school but you my friend you make it soo interesting!!

    @CasanovaPopperz@CasanovaPopperz2 жыл бұрын
  • If any one is truly interested in learning about Churchill and Roosevelt: read Nigel Wilson’ s three books: 1) The Mantle of Command, 2) The Commander in Chief, 3) War and Peace.

    @hopeforbetter382@hopeforbetter3822 жыл бұрын
  • Roosevelt, having seen the debacle of the aftermath of WWI, clearly saw the basic problems. His actions during WWII were directed towards ending imperialism. It is why many agreements were signed on US currency instead of treaties,

    @walterulasinksi7031@walterulasinksi70313 жыл бұрын
    • FDR was an evil man. He knew about Pearl Harbor, but let the US Soldiers die! FDR was ugl because he let millions of european die, just to came late to the show and get all the fruits. Only reason why USA is a superpower now ist because they ripped europe empty

      @marcze2525@marcze25253 жыл бұрын
    • No he was not evil nor did he know of the pending Japanese attack. There was a list of suspected areas for attack, Pearl, Midway and US west coast, but the US was not reading Japanese codes until 1Q42. Nor did Churchill know as some have suggested.

      @glennpickard2239@glennpickard22392 жыл бұрын
    • @@marcze2525 Roosevelt, had to contend with two powerful factions at home. The pacifists who wanted nothing to do with the another European war which included some industrialists, and the industrialists that saw the great profit potential. Up until 1938, the US was selling scrap steel and large amounts of Oil to Japan. This ended with their invasion into China, He was trying to get Japan to settle by economic pressure of deprivation of materials. This infuriated the military except Yamamoto who had gone to college in the US and understood the industrial potential of the US. While Churchill did make some persuasive arguments after September ,1939, during 1940-41 Roosevelt sent emissaries unofficially around the world to countries that would need support after the war was finished so these private wealthy citizens acting on FDR’s behalf made under the table agreements with various rebel leaders to fight against Germany and Japan,unbeknownst to Churchill. Such as Mahatma Ghandi, and Ho Chi Minh. These agreements were signed on US currency byRoosevelt and his emissary then the persons affiliated with the agreement all in secret. These agreements would have been the basis of Roosevelt’s stance after the war. Even the most vocal of the non involvement proponents such as the US ambassador to Britain, Joseph P Kennedy publicly stated that we should have no involvement unless we were attacked. A premise that we have followed until 9/11.

      @walterulasinksi7031@walterulasinksi70312 жыл бұрын
    • @@walterulasinksi7031 Pearl Harbor and 9/11 aren't even remotely the same. Pearl Harbor happened because we put Japan on a draconian oil embargo. Japan didn't "invade" Manchuria, because China had no right to the land; same with the annexation of Korea, which the Koreans wanted and the western powers recognized it. Japan was an easier target to lure into war than Germany, Japan was also battered fighting KMT forces for 10 years, no western power cared at all for a decade until it was convenient for them. FDR signed JB 355 months before Pearl Harbor, he was borrowing Chinese bombers to attack Japan. FDR did have to placate both sides, but all he had to do was be honest; he could have convinced the American public that the US had to help the Allies take down Germany, instead he lied and threw a former ally under the bus. 9/11 was intended to have as much civilian casualties as possible; the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor believing eliminating the naval fleet could end the war earlier, they had to fight the US and Allied forces either way if they stayed in the dutch east indies. Bin Laden formulated 9/11 because the US supported Israel.

      @millabasset1710@millabasset17102 жыл бұрын
    • @@millabasset1710 yes the Oil sales reduction was draconian as was the restrictions on selling them our scrap steel. Both were due to the expansionist actions of Japan. When Roosevelt transferred the major pacific fleet to Pearl Harbor as a measure to decrease transit time to defend the Philippines, and while some of the Japanese codes were broken as far back as WWI, the code changes after the expansionist movement began, placed the US at a disadvantage. It might have been anticipated that the Japanese would try to take Borneo where the British had control of the oil there, but we could not be sure.

      @walterulasinksi7031@walterulasinksi70312 жыл бұрын
  • Still, two of the world's most important leaders.

    @jrt9@jrt95 жыл бұрын
  • They were titans. Thank you for the outstanding upload!

    @1JamesMayToGoPlease@1JamesMayToGoPlease Жыл бұрын
  • Great men have to judge situations and decide what to do. It takes courage.

    @janiekcarney5482@janiekcarney5482 Жыл бұрын
  • you guys have incredible documentaries...videos , actors , thr writing and the presentation is really well done.I can say i learned a lot more from these documentaries than from school.Keep up the good work

    @sigho1@sigho14 жыл бұрын
    • While I too enjoy these types of documentaries; the viewpoint is so steeped in British Imperial positions that it begs for coverage from the US (or French or Indian?) point of view. There is also an underlying Churchilean view that the US owed the British help.

      @GSteel-rh9iu@GSteel-rh9iu Жыл бұрын
  • With two friends of this cast there can be no reason to have enemies.

    @johnzeszutko5661@johnzeszutko56613 жыл бұрын
  • It was a fascinating relationship between Churchill and Roosevelt

    @1burnman@1burnman2 жыл бұрын
  • Great narration and music and content.

    @CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY@CONTACTLIGHTTOMMY2 жыл бұрын
  • These are very well done - that FDR was a slippery fella batting his eyelids at Churchill while never intending to go to second or third base.

    @nigefal@nigefal4 жыл бұрын
  • Does anyone know where to find the full soundtrack of this series? It is just so beautiful.

    @theprofburg@theprofburg6 жыл бұрын
  • This feels like 'part one'. Is there a video on the remainder of the war, Yalta agreement and the fallout?

    @casteretpollux@casteretpollux2 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent lesson on geopolitics.

    @57palmtree@57palmtree2 жыл бұрын
  • Very well done. Unusual to discover new information about an old story.

    @DCFunBud@DCFunBud6 жыл бұрын
    • This actually not new information there is a documentary called (behind closed doors) that added more to this. if you haven't watched it I strongly recommend it is made by the BBC

      @TheRealSpeedWolf@TheRealSpeedWolf6 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you for your kind recommendation. The information was new to me, at least!

      @DCFunBud@DCFunBud6 жыл бұрын
    • DCFunBud easily accomplished when the whole story is fiction.

      @jrt9@jrt95 жыл бұрын
    • @@jrt9 how

      @ben3634@ben36343 жыл бұрын
  • When the British Army was rescued from Dunkirk, in EARLY June, 1940, FDR turned over to the British more than million rifles, 250 rounds for each, as well as 900 field artillery pieces. By the end of summer Roosevelt was turning over nearly the full monthly production runs of US P-40 fighters, which made all the difference in the early stages of the North African campaign. By spring 1941 the US Navy was waging an undeclared war against German subs in the Atlantic.

    @janicegustafson2745@janicegustafson27454 жыл бұрын
    • Correct, all part of the lend-lease program. And the Navy was there to protect their cargo ships technically.

      @Dennis19901@Dennis199013 жыл бұрын
    • How much was the UK charged by the US ?

      @casteretpollux@casteretpollux2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Dennis19901 i.e.paid for.

      @casteretpollux@casteretpollux2 жыл бұрын
    • @@casteretpollux ....yes That is what lend-lease means.

      @Dennis19901@Dennis199012 жыл бұрын
    • BUT TO ENGLISH, IT WASNT ENOUGH.

      @DS-xp4jb@DS-xp4jb2 жыл бұрын
  • Roosevelt wanted to dismantle the British empire and other European empires left. He was very clear. And he did and

    @marvinbrando722@marvinbrando7222 жыл бұрын
    • Precisely…

      @monkmonkmonk@monkmonkmonk2 жыл бұрын
  • That kid seemed like a good guy. That tends to happen I imagine with the sons of powerful/egotistical men. They are either broken in trying to live up to their impossible standards of their father or they find happiness in not pursuing a path to power.

    @tomsawyer7429@tomsawyer74292 жыл бұрын
  • Geat documentary, great information. Thank you for sharing.

    @aloha2104@aloha21045 жыл бұрын
  • I loved this series

    @centurymemes1208@centurymemes12083 жыл бұрын
  • excellent one here.

    @liuzeyuan@liuzeyuan2 жыл бұрын
  • Best documentary channel ever

    @cassandraralph5906@cassandraralph59062 жыл бұрын
  • within a few minutes one has to seriously question the calibre of research. Churchill wasn't First Lord of the Admiralty in 1918. I believe he would have been Minister of Munitions in 1918

    @mutleyeng@mutleyeng6 жыл бұрын
    • Correct. Churchill became First Lord in 1911, and was sacked in 1915 in the aftermath of the aborted Gallipoli campaign that he had championed. Churchill was out of government from late 1915 until July 1917, when he was appointed Minister of Munitions. He later served as Minister of War from 1919 to 1921.

      @egosumhomovespertilionem2022@egosumhomovespertilionem20226 жыл бұрын
    • Rolf Jander Elizabeth II Regina, the current Queen Regnant of the UK, had a mother, who was merely Elizabeth, the Queen Consort of the UK, also called Queen Elizabeth. Americans and others not overly concerned with the British monarchy, probably only know her as the “Queen Mother.”

      @meeeka@meeeka6 жыл бұрын
    • @Rolf Jander Did they mean the Queen Mother? Then called Queen Elizabeth?

      @foxycinnamon7307@foxycinnamon73074 жыл бұрын
    • @@meeeka As George V was king during WWI, the then Queen Elizabeth was the current Queen's grandmother. "Elizabeth "is just one of those names that keeps popping up in the royal family.

      @mjbull5156@mjbull51564 жыл бұрын
    • Queen Elizabeth, the mother of the then Princess Elizabeth

      @sampuatisamuel9785@sampuatisamuel97853 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for reporting the chess moves these giants had contemplated.

    @michaeljoseph3528@michaeljoseph35284 жыл бұрын
  • Superb series....

    @chrismccartney8668@chrismccartney86682 жыл бұрын
  • No true politician can EVER be taken at face value

    @dipanwitadasgupta5221@dipanwitadasgupta52212 жыл бұрын
  • In 1918 Churchill was minister of munitions not first lord of Admiralty.

    @sh8009@sh80095 жыл бұрын
    • +sh8009 No! You are just saying that cause Churchill was a Zionist.

      @strikerorwell9232@strikerorwell92324 жыл бұрын
    • sh8009 first lord 1911 1915 Gallipoli got him

      @millardwashington6216@millardwashington62164 жыл бұрын
  • Dude... no matter what, Churchill and Roosevelt are some of my favorite men of history.. idc what their issues were about, these men faught and encouraged freedom for hundreds of millions of people. I just really wish that the U.S would’ve helped a lot sooner. I know it was complicated, but man... it could’ve possibly saved a lot of human lives. As much as I dearly love FDR, I think I love Churchill a little more. Just something about that guy

    @jimbeaux89@jimbeaux894 жыл бұрын
    • More like encouraged plutocracy

      @TwistedMarksman@TwistedMarksman2 жыл бұрын
    • Yes you're correct Dark!!

      @eglysbroslat2885@eglysbroslat28852 жыл бұрын
  • it’s watching things like this that i realize i do not know nearly as much as i thought i did

    @apocalypseblues3897@apocalypseblues38972 жыл бұрын
  • my takeaway from this is that all states act for itself. no state would risk its neck out to help others unless they have an ulterior more profitable motive. In the arena of diplomacy there are no allies, only fleeting bedmates.

    @domainx2806@domainx28062 жыл бұрын
  • THE ANGLOSPHERE , UK , USA , CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND ARE THE STRONGEST ALLIANCE IN THE WORLD. Language, culture, rights , outlook on the world , individualism , multicultural, Christian Judeo Values. Intelligence sharing, trade, everything

    @salt27dogg@salt27dogg3 жыл бұрын
    • And all owned by the Crown of England, which is owned by the Vatican

      @BobbyBowker@BobbyBowker3 жыл бұрын
    • @@BobbyBowker Don't tell that to the Ulster Protestants for God'S sake!

      @annehebert510@annehebert5103 жыл бұрын
    • @@annehebert510 my ancestors are Ulster Scots

      @BobbyBowker@BobbyBowker3 жыл бұрын
    • Teri Kay Let's not get too excited. 'For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.' (Romans 3:23). I'm glad that you mentioned multiculturalism, although multiracial harmony matters a lot more IMO. As for Judeo-Christianity, this has been abandoned by a majority of the population, and I'm not prepared to lay the blame at the feet of immigrants. We in the Anglosphere are a mission field, not just a launching pad for missions!

      @jesusislordsavior6343@jesusislordsavior63433 жыл бұрын
    • German russian japan alliance maybe can be good if they dont have paranoia

      @jeredorksider69@jeredorksider693 жыл бұрын
  • When finally agreeing to send those WW1 destroyers to Churchill, I was always told that it certainly helped when Roosevelt and the American people saw conviction in Churchill's attitude. When he authorized and executed the unfortunate but necessary act of seizing the French fleet it made people more comfortable with the decision. Did I miss it's inclusion here ?

    @terryrussel523@terryrussel5236 жыл бұрын
    • what french fleet was seized?

      @abdihassan7208@abdihassan72082 жыл бұрын
    • Its is possessive. I know that stinks. A contraction of it and is =it's. The dog wagged its tail. I know. It's stupid but that's the way it is. Au revoir!

      @greggoreo6738@greggoreo67382 жыл бұрын
    • @@abdihassan7208 look up British attack on Mers El Kebir.

      @jektopi@jektopi Жыл бұрын
  • Good one...

    @dhanjeepandey4252@dhanjeepandey4252 Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent doc

    @BamBamSr@BamBamSr Жыл бұрын
  • We are an Empire. Empires do not bargain...Wow that's pride. Churchill was half American.

    @jcampezzi1027@jcampezzi10276 жыл бұрын
    • "Empires do not bargain"......Empires on the other hand *will* come begging for a free handout......Although Churchill himself can not be accused of appeasing the nazis......It was the Empire's own fault they were in the position they were in......partly for not supporting a still democratic Germany, while appeasing the nazis.....

      @PAULLONDEN@PAULLONDEN5 жыл бұрын
    • Σερ δε γνωρίζει ένας ακόμα αθυγγανος στην ασφαλείς Θεσσαλονίκης στην οδό.δωδεκανησου περιοχή Βαρδάρη περήφανος του κ.Churchjl που του αρέσει το καφε"everest"..δείτε της Αύγουστο της κάμερες της αστυνομίας και να τους πείτε να μη σβήνετε τα βίντεο και της καμερες

      @annathomaidou2582@annathomaidou25825 жыл бұрын
    • He was also half Jewish and full communist

      @_Patton_Was_Right@_Patton_Was_Right5 жыл бұрын
    • (Proceeds to lose almost the entire empire. Mostly to US)

      @VersusARCH@VersusARCH5 жыл бұрын
    • But the empire did end haha. Just not to Germany. Britain is nothing like it used to be

      @kevinkilbane2007@kevinkilbane20074 жыл бұрын
  • While they were writing "love letters" to each other the other two buddies of some months prior were duking it out at ten thousands soldiers dead a day on each side. Calling it commitment of difference.

    @lukelewkowicz2233@lukelewkowicz22333 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks!

    @beachwizard9701@beachwizard97012 жыл бұрын
KZhead