Royal Marine Reacts To SPEED COMPARISON 3D | Aircraft 🛩️

2024 ж. 17 Мам.
33 678 Рет қаралды

Original Video (SPEED COMPARISON 3D | Aircraft 🛩️)
• SPEED COMPARISON 3D | ...
DREADNOUGHT MEADERY!
KZhead: / @dreadnoughtmeadery
Instagram: / dreadnoughtmeadery
BECOME A MEMBER
www.youtube.com/@OriginalHuma...
SOCIALS
►Instagram @OriginalHuman_
►Twitter: @OriginalHuman_
►Discord: / discord
►Facebook: / originalhuman.videos
►Business inquires: originalhumanbusiness@gmail.com
OTHER CHANNELS
►The Sword And Scabbard: / @theswordandscabbard7909
►OriginalAdventures: / channel
►OriginalHuman Geek: / @originalhumangeek .
.
MY EQUIPMENT:
Camera: amzn.to/3W9dL37
Lights: amzn.to/3JtLflf
Key Board: amzn.to/3JpPWwx
Headphones: amzn.to/3JrF15x
Mouse: amzn.to/49P81ij
Monitors: amzn.to/4aLd1FP
Mic: amzn.to/3U7XWXY
Audio mixer: amzn.to/4b2FJSr
StreamDeck: amzn.to/4b4lHH1
Favorite Books:
Norse Mythology: Neil Gaiman
amzn.to/4b24Ftc
The Way of Kings: Brandon Sanderson
amzn.to/3JyHIlu
Breath: James Nestor
amzn.to/3Jur9Y7
We Are Nature: Ray Mears
amzn.to/3JurhXB
The Last Kingdom: Bernard Cornwell
amzn.to/3w4JjN0

Пікірлер
  • Fastest missiles comparison is even funnier and scary 😂

    @martin96991@martin969913 ай бұрын
    • I felt like it was a bit unfair. It wasn't purely missiles it was missiles and MIRVs. A re-entry vehicle (MIRV) is obviously going to go way faster than any missile in atmosphere when the MIRV has less to no air resistance against it and it has gravity on its side. It's still fascinating, but it feels a bit cheeky saying "this last part that comes bad down from low earth orbit is faster than this one that travels from point A to point B and never gets above 2000 meters above its launch point" or whatever.

      @steeljawX@steeljawX3 ай бұрын
    • That video is mental bro I clicked so fast when I saw the notification

      @williamestrada1773@williamestrada17733 ай бұрын
    • yup drag race missile it so cool

      @Zul_H@Zul_H9 күн бұрын
  • The SR-71 Blackbird was used to fly deep into enemy territory (usually Soviet) and collect information that was inaccessible by using satellites. Its speed and recon from high altitude (85,000 feet or 16 miles) allowed it to avoid interception and in some cases literally outrun missiles. The main reason for its lack of widespread use was its cost: ~$250 million per year of operation per plane + ~$20,000 per hour for the fuel

    @kadenfauble@kadenfauble3 ай бұрын
    • Worth it.

      @robertcampomizzi7988@robertcampomizzi79883 ай бұрын
    • The SR-72 is an unreleased confirmed successor to the SR-71, which will have a cruising speed of close to Mach 7

      @calebbell876@calebbell8763 ай бұрын
    • Technically, the U2 Dragonlady was the one to flight deep into Soviet territory, I believe. However, after one crashed and the pilot captured, the US decided to have the SR-71 fly along the Soviet’s borders instead. Its cameras were so sharp and HD, that the SR-71 didn’t need to fly all that deep into the territory. The cameras could do that for it.

      @3Authoress@3Authoress3 ай бұрын
    • @@calebbell876 "reported" mach 7 ...meaning a smidge faster under circumstances warranted. Designed to mach any enemy

      @bluflaam777@bluflaam777Ай бұрын
  • The plane that flew by around 2:19 was F-15 Eagle. There was White transparent caption at top of video. Mach 2.5 (2,665kph)

    @austinverlinden2236@austinverlinden22363 ай бұрын
  • The first flight of the X-15 was 1959 and did a mach 6.7 flight in 1967. The Wright flight was 1903. That's only a span of 56 years and 64 years respectively. Also never forget, the space shuttle goes mach 25. Not 2.5 but 25.

    @ryanweintraub9448@ryanweintraub94483 ай бұрын
  • The blackbird flew at the edge of space, with it's cameras it could see everything. It's speed was it's defense against enemy anti-aircraft measures, it was so fast it could outrun missiles.

    @eddawg79@eddawg793 ай бұрын
    • They outran all but one lucky missile.

      @arkthefennecfox2366@arkthefennecfox23663 ай бұрын
  • Speed doesn't affect the human body, only acceleration does.

    @bf5175@bf51753 ай бұрын
  • The reason the F35 is “slow” by comparison is because of studies showing that pilots rarely ever pushed Mach 1.8 in general flying in combat

    @AJwiththeAK@AJwiththeAK3 ай бұрын
  • The Rutan Voyager is the first aircraft to fly around the world non stop and unrefueled.

    @jaycooper2812@jaycooper28123 ай бұрын
  • When I lived on the South Llano river in west Texas you'd occasionally hear F-22's fly by in the river valley. They came by at eye level since my house was around 100 feet above the valley/river. The only way to get a glimpse of them is if there were at least two of them since they were long gone by the time you heard em. As I said they were eye level and they were around 100 yards away and they were flat out hauling ass!!!

    @TrulyUnfortunate@TrulyUnfortunate3 ай бұрын
  • The Xb-70 Valkire was a long range nuclear bomber prototype that was designed to go mach3 plus. They only built 2 and one was destroyed in a collision with a F-104 Starfighter escort. The other one on display at the Air Force Museum.

    @jaycooper2812@jaycooper28123 ай бұрын
  • The blackbird gets me so pumped

    @tomfox9083@tomfox90833 ай бұрын
  • Give me an F-104 -Lawndart- I mean -Widowmaker- no, I mean Starfighter. Absolutely beautiful with that T-tail.

    @ShovelMonkey@ShovelMonkey3 ай бұрын
  • Human body doesn't care about constant speed, it's sudden changes (aka acceleration/deceleration) that become the problem.

    @steven7650@steven76503 ай бұрын
    • exactly - it's not the fall that kills you, it's the poorly managed deceleration

      @scottstewart5784@scottstewart57843 ай бұрын
  • If the Wright Brothers could only see us now!!!

    @TrulyUnfortunate@TrulyUnfortunate3 ай бұрын
  • The Bell X-1 was not a jet. It was rocket powered. Jet engines require an outside air source to function, rocket engies do not.

    @ExUSSailor@ExUSSailor3 ай бұрын
    • The Mig-25 & 31, if they're to try, and, maintain their on-paper top speed any longer than about 2 - 3 minutes, their crappy, Russkie engines start to disintegrate. And, the Chengdou J-20, in reality, can't go anywhere near as fast as it says here.

      @ExUSSailor@ExUSSailor3 ай бұрын
    • Whatever does not have a propeller or has an afterburner, I count as a jet. Rocket powered jets included.

      @Eagleblazer69@Eagleblazer69Ай бұрын
  • Wild video. From the Wright Bros first flight in 1903 it was only 66 years until man landed on the moon in 1969. Its been 55 years since then.

    @Daehawk@Daehawk3 ай бұрын
  • love these comparison videos...i recommend a deep dive into the X-15 (another of my fav planes)...

    @sseltrek1a2b@sseltrek1a2b2 ай бұрын
  • 14:38 I would assume after a while you just become the cockpit wall paint 😂😂😂

    @TexasJellyfish@TexasJellyfish3 ай бұрын
    • I believe top speed has no real effect on the human body. It's the acceleration and deceleration that messes us up. Unless I'm mistaken, you could be just fine at mach10 as long as you accelerated to that point very gradually.

      @Mike-if1nn@Mike-if1nn3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Mike-if1nnmost manned space programs im pretty sure exceeded mach 10 to get up there. i think it was the channel smarter every day did a video in a plane with the us military and showed what it looked like breaking the sound barrier. pretty anti climatic😅

      @myname5099@myname50993 ай бұрын
  • Bell X-1 was not one of the first jet/rocket aircraft but it was the first yo brake the sound barrier

    @CrispyPratt@CrispyPrattКүн бұрын
  • The SR-71 Blackbird has never reached a true top speed ax the aircrews were forbidden to advance the throttles above 70%.

    @jaycooper2812@jaycooper28123 ай бұрын
    • Why was that?

      @MDDeGrande1994@MDDeGrande199410 күн бұрын
  • Stealth planes tend to be slower because the friction with the air (heat) at higher speeds damages the radar absorbent material and would ruin the planes stealth

    @igs_@igs_3 ай бұрын
  • 3:56 OriginallHuman: Is this the first jet (describing the bell X1) Me 262: Am I a joke to you

    @AndyFrx009@AndyFrx00918 күн бұрын
  • And definitely do their other fastest ones, are awesome

    @Plastikdoom@Plastikdoom3 ай бұрын
  • the f22 top speed is still i think completely classified. along with the competitor top speed of the yf23 too my knowledge they just let you know basically what the minimum specs for the aircraft to get accepted into the program.

    @kinser11x@kinser11x3 ай бұрын
  • Fun fact: Based off of the A-12, the SR-71 series aircraft was developed solely for the USAF under a highly classified enemy perimeter surveillance program. The YF/A-12 and M-12 series aircraft was only ever operated by the CIA; pilots included. These collected surveillance, even over enemy airspace. SR-71 = “official-unofficial” black plane missions and the YF/A-12 = “nonexistent/unofficial” missions lol

    @migtheautomator@migtheautomator3 ай бұрын
    • The YF-12 was a prototype for a MACH 3+ interceptor based on the A-12/SR-71 family of aircraft. it was cancelled before going into production, but if it had entered service its job would have been to intercept soviet bombers with 3x AIM-47A Falcon missiles. the first versions of which contained a W42 Nuclear warhead. although the YF-12 was cancelled the AIM-47 was further developed into the AIM-54 Pheonix missile made famous by the F-14 Tomcat.

      @Knightfang1@Knightfang13 ай бұрын
  • Well the spitfire shown in the video is a Spitfire mk5 . Its top speed is 594 kmph, but the last variation of the Spitfire, the Spitfire mk 24 s top speed is 774 kmph (484mph) while its successor the Spitefull , and its last variation the Spitefull F mk 16 s top speed is about 795 kmph ( 494mph) making it the second fastest piston engine fighter aircraft ever, while the fastest piston engine fighter plane is the prototype p47 called xp 72, AKA (XP47 j ) with a top speed of 812 kmph ( 505 mph)

    @slbathi_wt8528@slbathi_wt85283 ай бұрын
  • I found RED SIDE recently and binge watched so many of the videos, love that it's done in Unreal Engine 5. Also the cost difference between the F-22 and the F-35 is crazy, $63mi

    @darkceptor44@darkceptor443 ай бұрын
  • The blackbird was built to outrun Russian missiles LOL. And it did on a few occasions. That's just the ones we know about.

    @TheMeanmarine13@TheMeanmarine133 ай бұрын
  • Also allegedly there is a us aircraft called the tr3b black manta, you should watch this I highly recommend it if you are into us aircraft

    @letsexplainit5479@letsexplainit547918 күн бұрын
  • 3:57 not the first jet, the He 178 was

    @Some_Guy987@Some_Guy9873 ай бұрын
  • 14:40 The body will undergo extreme G forces (gravitational Force) and a normal Human Cannot Handle more than 3-4 Gs And If the G limit Increases you will be put on G lock Basically you will go unconscious.

    @ansil8005@ansil800514 күн бұрын
  • Long, long ago, . . . when I was a kid we regularly heard the sound barrier being broken by the Military planes. It was a near daily occurrence. The boom goes through you. And they are not doing recon at those speeds. They are running away when they get caught doing recon. 😉

    @user-nm8jj1bn3q@user-nm8jj1bn3q3 ай бұрын
  • Looks like NASA has recovered some new ships for our galactic friends 😂😂😂😂

    @davidburney8463@davidburney84633 ай бұрын
  • Yall get the tail number of that jet

    @davidburney8463@davidburney84633 ай бұрын
  • At Mach 10 in the darkstar it would legit take like 3 hours and 40 minutes to fly around the globe :|

    @RassGames@RassGamesАй бұрын
  • the Rutan Voyager flew around the world non-stop.

    @theblackbear211@theblackbear2113 ай бұрын
  • What happened to the concord

    @user-um2zs4sb6r@user-um2zs4sb6r3 ай бұрын
  • bro says mach like mac book lmao

    @lilcid17@lilcid173 ай бұрын
  • I beleive all pilots of the X-15 earned the astronaut wings .

    @stevenmcgrath5114@stevenmcgrath51143 ай бұрын
  • Had to stop at mach 16 lol great vid

    @kungpochopedtuna@kungpochopedtuna3 ай бұрын
    • There was no Mach 16

      @lf198@lf198Ай бұрын
  • Don’t remember if I’ve seen this one or not, please tell me they covered the bell X-15, haha, comment as he started the intro, so no idea.

    @Plastikdoom@Plastikdoom3 ай бұрын
  • @REDSIDEofficial@REDSIDEofficial3 ай бұрын
  • The messerschmitt Me 262 was the first Jet engine aircraft in production, not the Bell X-1. Also the spitfire was plagued by oil problems, not as amazing of an aircraft as the movies make it out to be, killed a lot of their own pilots.

    @BudgetLatifi@BudgetLatifi3 ай бұрын
  • SR-71 still the fasted air breathing jet to ever fly. There's some good videos out there on the design and building of the aircraft.

    @buddystewart2020@buddystewart20203 ай бұрын
  • Russian hypersonic glide vehicle - Avangard. Maximum speed Mach 27.

    @cerberdog6667@cerberdog66673 ай бұрын
  • The jolly ol' Spitfire got most of the press . . . . . . But I believe the Hawker Hurricane did most of the work in the Battle of Britain .

    @stevenmcgrath5114@stevenmcgrath51143 ай бұрын
  • Spaceball I... They've gone to plaid!

    @gregr2445@gregr24453 ай бұрын
  • They never really gave the real speed or altitude.

    @susanwahl6322@susanwahl63223 ай бұрын
  • The SR-71 could out run the sam missiles and the russian aircraft sent to shoot it down. And it could fly higher,at the edge of space, so nothing could touch it. it was retired when we came up with military satellites.

    @TrulyUnfortunate@TrulyUnfortunate3 ай бұрын
  • We have achieved flight on another planet.

    @augl2702@augl27023 ай бұрын
    • Yes we have with Prosperity

      @markjohnson9977@markjohnson99773 ай бұрын
  • They wont be able to fly that speed at low level. Those speeds are high altitude I think. Especially the X-15 that flew right at the edge of space.

    @gr3yh4wk1@gr3yh4wk1Ай бұрын
  • Also I’m subscribed, so I’m one of the 10%, haha

    @Plastikdoom@Plastikdoom3 ай бұрын
  • That speed for F-15 is incorrect. The actual top speed of the F-15c is 1994 mph.

    @jaycooper2812@jaycooper28123 ай бұрын
  • just look at the shape of the planes but do you think the space shuttle really does 17.000 mph in 6 minutes from takeoff

    @jagjay8033@jagjay80333 ай бұрын
  • So I may be talking out of my ass. But I question some of these numbers specifically the F-16. The reason aerodynamics and wind flow the air intake for the turbine does not have diffusers or anything to slow the air down. Thus, it cannot go mock too as you would have an inverse of aerodynamics and the engine would just get sheared right out of it. If I'm wrong or if there has been something added that I am unaware of, I'm going off of my knowledge from at least 15 years ago then. Please correct me, but if you ever look at the front of an F-16 at that giant shark mouth, you can see the turbine right there which means there's no diffuser system

    @abbadon010@abbadon0103 ай бұрын
  • Bell X1 and X15 were not jets. It was rocket-powered so technically not a plane.

    @smylebutta7250@smylebutta72503 ай бұрын
  • I believe the X-43 was a ramjet .

    @stevenmcgrath5114@stevenmcgrath51143 ай бұрын
    • *Scramjet

      @MDDeGrande1994@MDDeGrande199410 күн бұрын
    • @@MDDeGrande1994 Thanks buddy ! ! ! Scramjets don't do well in in the lower atmosphere.

      @stevenmcgrath5114@stevenmcgrath51149 күн бұрын
    • @@stevenmcgrath5114 Yeah, this is just a CGI animation where physics don't really count.

      @MDDeGrande1994@MDDeGrande19949 күн бұрын
  • Messerschmitt was the first jet 3:49 🤙

    @letsexplainit5479@letsexplainit547918 күн бұрын
  • I'm a 10%er! Haha

    @kungpochopedtuna@kungpochopedtuna3 ай бұрын
  • Your camshot blocked to much of the video !!!

    @blackstone47@blackstone47Ай бұрын
  • The F-22 can fly on Super Cruise for long periods unlike any other jet aircraft that can only do it for short bursts. And the F-22 is the only US fighter we wont sell to anyone even our allies.

    @TrulyUnfortunate@TrulyUnfortunate3 ай бұрын
  • You have to create video on Hindu's most favourite songs like shiv tandav by Shankar Mahadevan or uma mohan, the Hanuman chalisa by sachet parampara, kaal bhairav strotam by agam Agarwal and aigiri nandini. I will give you 100% guarantee that after listening this songs your mind will be relax and feeling very strong.. I have given you the next content for you .. jai hind jai shree ram 🚩

    @DebojyotiMukherjee-ci8pq@DebojyotiMukherjee-ci8pq3 ай бұрын
  • Video creator should have put the space shuttle at the end lol. Speed during re-entry was ~mach 25 (~17,500 mph). Albeit, at that speed it's control surfaces weren't used for aerodynamic stability. Still, wild as a point of comparison.

    @MrRenneck@MrRenneck3 ай бұрын
  • The Rutan Voyager (Roo-tan) 1:54 was the first aircraft to fly around the world non stop without refueling. The creator of the plane, Burt Rutan, was also one of the two pilots of the round the world flight, and designed many other aircraft...including the only other airplane to fly around the world non stop without refueling. 😁 As noted, the Bell X-1 was not a jet...it was rocket powered to be the first aircraft to break the speed of sound in 1947 with Chuck Yeager as pilot. Speed indicated for the SU-35 is correct for the Mach 2.25 number, but then that Mach number is calculated way wrong...Mach 2.25 is about 1500mph...not the ridiculous 1726mph that is used.

    @iKvetch558@iKvetch5583 ай бұрын
  • WHERE IS GEARS OF WAR LUKE PLS N THANKS LOVE YOU

    @umbai8962@umbai89623 ай бұрын
  • Please make a reaction comparing militaries of different countries ❤

    @TalkingTacosFood@TalkingTacosFood3 ай бұрын
  • Damn, I'm finding out now that when I took those 2 tabs of acid back in the 90's I went mach 30 lol

    @shalakabooyaka1480@shalakabooyaka14803 ай бұрын
  • Fun Fact: We actually went from barely being able to get off the ground (Wright Flyer, 1903), to the fastest, air-breathing, human-piloted aircraft EVER (SR-71, 1963), in just 60 years. Yet in the (roughly) 100 years since Dr. Robert Goddard first pioneered modern rocketry, we are still using the same, basic technology.

    @Rotorhead1651@Rotorhead16513 ай бұрын
  • The F-111 had an interesting ejection system, the entire cockpit would detach from the plane and slow down with parachutes before the pilot ejected. They stopped using those jets since many of the materials in the plane had asbestos in them. Australia buried dozens of those jets in a mass landfill about five years ago

    @tfrowlett8752@tfrowlett87523 ай бұрын
  • Although one thing this video got horribly wrong, you won’t hear them/process you heard them if right below the sound barrier, until they already bombed you/took pictures. You’re dead before or right as you realize an aircraft is there…and the insanely fast ones, you’ll bebkucky to see them, as high altitude and super fast, it’ll be seconds after you seen them/could see them, that you’ll hear them. And by then. They are gone, beyond visual range. And oh, trust me F-15’s are faster than that at altitude, they beat every official Soviet posted speed and altitude record, as they (Soviet) made can’t perform to what they say, and only blow up/crash or they attempt it, where as ours US out perform our publicly released data, by at least a little, if not a lot. No propaganda, just the truth. Even our helos far outperform stated stats, easily, let alone jets. An F-15 will out run any Soviet or other made, conventional jet engine powered aircraft or any other one ever made with the exception of the XB-70, YF and SR 71 variants, all American made mind you, that’s reality and history. Been proven decades and decades ago, over 5 decades ago and running still.

    @Plastikdoom@Plastikdoom3 ай бұрын
  • Really cool video, you seem like a really nice dude have a pint with. Jus sayen.

    @72tadrian65@72tadrian653 ай бұрын
  • You should watch the found and explained video on the sr-72

    @Isaacsbased@Isaacsbased3 ай бұрын
  • Interesting video but not accurate. The supersonic aircraft can only achieve their high speeds at very high altitudes, where the pilot is not blinded by object references. The high altitude and speed is necessary to outrun Russian and Chinese missiles that would otherwise down the planes. The extremely high resolution cameras on the planes record Iran's shipment of rockets to its proxies in Gaza, Lebanon, Yemen and any other state willing to harass the West. Iran, understandably, does not want to get its butt kicked but is happy to let its crazed proxies experience retaliation.

    @TheBinaryWolf@TheBinaryWolf3 ай бұрын
  • 14:39 while going that speed you wouldn't really feel much. As what really affects you is change in acceleration. Think of it how you don't feel any different driving down the highway vs a normal road, but speeding up to get onto the highway will push you back into your seat.

    @cheeseninja1115@cheeseninja11153 ай бұрын
  • The SR72 is testing right now. It's theoretically capable of Mach 11, but we'll probably never know of it makes it or not. Lol

    @americansmark@americansmark3 ай бұрын
  • F35 uses standoff weapons. You need time to launch those.

    @seasonallyferal1439@seasonallyferal14393 ай бұрын
  • I’m pretty sure the seatbelt inventor traveled Mach speeds on land to prove the need for seatbelts

    @markjohnson9977@markjohnson99773 ай бұрын
  • Here is a question what is/was the fastest man made object ever?

    @deepdragon2@deepdragon23 ай бұрын
    • Apparently a manhole cover that blew up during a nuke test.

      @Crazyasian123456@Crazyasian1234563 ай бұрын
    • Manhole cover

      @shalakabooyaka1480@shalakabooyaka14803 ай бұрын
    • Not sure about actual machines or vehicles but if we’re talking about how fast have we ever sped up something that would be particles in particle accelerators. Over 99% the speed of light.

      @kenet362@kenet3623 ай бұрын
  • Still waiting in the halo 3d comparisons

    @gamingplex2208@gamingplex22083 ай бұрын
  • fastest missiles is a good one also

    @WallyWeaverz@WallyWeaverz3 ай бұрын
  • If you want to learn more about the SR 71, then check out the videos "Why Was This Plane Invulnerable" By Mustard and " How Was The Blackbirds Program Kept Secret" By Not What You Think, I think you would like the vids

    @pandanemi-0239@pandanemi-02393 ай бұрын
  • The SR 71? "You can't see anything going that fast." That would be correct at 20,000 ft, BUT..... the SR 71 flies at 80,000 where it has a fantastic view.

    @TheRagratus@TheRagratus3 ай бұрын
  • The x15 was dropped from the wing of a b52 just like a missile

    @bencruz563@bencruz5633 ай бұрын
  • No, in only 66 years from first flight until putting a man on the moon. It was only 36 years until the first jet aircraft.

    @user-po3ev7is5w@user-po3ev7is5w3 ай бұрын
  • The x37b is technically the fastest

    @seasonallyferal1439@seasonallyferal14393 ай бұрын
  • Sukhoi planes are so sexy. The Su-35 engine sound particularly awakens something primal in me

    @betelgeuse_99@betelgeuse_993 ай бұрын
  • You need to watch Brian Shul’s Sled Driver. He unfortunately just died.

    @susanwahl6322@susanwahl63223 ай бұрын
  • At 9:53 you say "looks like a rocket at this point." That one is a rocket. The SR71 is the fastest manned air breathing plane ever.

    @matthewbohn765@matthewbohn7653 ай бұрын
  • The Messerschmitt was the first jet

    @bryangates4591@bryangates45913 ай бұрын
  • From my understanding, any American aircraft with a Y in the designation is experimental. My favorite fighter is the F-117 nighthawk, while my second favorite is the experimental YF-23 Black Widow. Which is a sleeker sexier version of the F-22

    @travisthomas9992@travisthomas99923 ай бұрын
    • Also the SR-71 was meant to do recon and photographs from near outer space. You flew in one in the first Black ops game

      @travisthomas9992@travisthomas99923 ай бұрын
    • Y is Prototype, X is experimental. F-14 Tomcat will always be one of the best looking planes to me. they just look amazing and the perfect mix of sleek and industrial.

      @Loki_Trickster@Loki_Trickster3 ай бұрын
  • the human body doesn't react to speed. Only accleration

    @user-po3ev7is5w@user-po3ev7is5w3 ай бұрын
  • I have to say the F14 was one of the best ever it was the OG JSF before they were called JSF's.

    @deepdragon2@deepdragon23 ай бұрын
  • That SU 57? After years and years of delays the Russians now have a whole 22 of them. AND they are NOT true stealth/5th Gen aircraft it's too big. The US had what? 920 F-35 aircraft? AND the F 35 is a multi-role fighter while the F-22 is air superiority aircraft. Miss me with how great the SU 57 is. Its junk and they cant work out all the bugs.

    @TheRagratus@TheRagratus3 ай бұрын
    • They built the 1000th F35 this past January, thats a lot of jets.

      @shalakabooyaka1480@shalakabooyaka14803 ай бұрын
  • The YF-12 was the "[redacted] cousin" of the SR-71. I believe it was slowed down and had weapons slapped on it and it wasn't that successful because it was fast, not powerful. It could run, it couldn't take any hits. The SR-71 was THE BIGGEST TROLL reconnaissance plane out there. It didn't always travel Mach 3.4, that's just what it could do if it needed to. The SR-71 flew so much higher and faster than anything any hostile force could reach that it's well documented that when dictators like Saddam Hussein and Kim Jong Ill would do national addresses, the US would fly the SR-71 over head to watch what they were parading around. The pilots infamously would also do a bunch of sonic booms to just blast out the speeches and literally dump on the atmosphere of the "celebration". Why? Because again, no one can touch the SR-71 and what are they gonna do about it; attack the US because of a "noise complaint" and get their asses handed to them? That'll look great in the history books. Do note I'm saying this in the context of when the SR-71 was flying, not in modern terms. There's also a decent reason as to why the F-22 and F-35 are slower than their predecessors is because of two reasons that actually make a lot of sense. First is the advent and mastery of stealth means you don't have to really go so fast to not be hit, you just need stronger countermeasures. The second reason is that when you think about aerial combat, it's not happening at mach 2. Sure there might be instances where fighters might be trying to distance themselves from a missile or enemy, but the entire fight isn't happening miles away from each other at mach 2. So instead of making fighters that can turn and burn at mach 2+, it's better to have fuel and energy (in terms of flight) efficient fighters who can get their payload on their targets, not get hit, and do so in a timely manner.

    @steeljawX@steeljawX3 ай бұрын
  • SU 57 only 22 exist with only nine can fly at all. Russia wanted to sell to India because they hadnt enough money. After trails even India didnt wanted it because it was so bad and had nearly no stealth abilitys at all. Its just a russian wet dream like the T14 tank. Also Chinese and russian engines are so bad the top speed is false from all of them. Only wet dreams and propaganda.

    @michaeld.uchiha9084@michaeld.uchiha90843 ай бұрын
  • Please react on misiile comparison

    @prajwalsingh2445@prajwalsingh24453 ай бұрын
  • Sharia for britain ☪️☪️

    @brutalsurgeon3949@brutalsurgeon39493 ай бұрын
KZhead