1 FPS VS 24 FPS Stickman Fight

Sooo true bro

yess

The problem is if you have one frame they attack you from the other side of the map

Fr

*B I G B R A I N*

Nice

*the tablet i'm using : probably 60fps* *me : whoops*

Let’s leave it at 169 likes.

That happened to me with a hypixel game of bedwars, I lagged so much that killed the other guy, then I randomly got kicked for hacking. I was like wut

Yah

Since the faster u punch the deadlier, 1fps from 0-100 at 0 seconds that guy in 24fps should've lost instantly lol

Yeah, technically you're punching at a faster speed in-between frames even though you're "moving" at 1 FPS, so your attacks are going to be way stronger than someone who's moving at a fluid, constant speed thanks to a higher FPS. However, if you're at a higher FPS, then that means you can hit them more in less time and be a generally more consistent fighter, which is perhaps why 24 FPS won at the end despite getting initially curb-stomped.

unless there is ping-sync, also yeah it is for ping not for fps, fps is client sided

​@@terranceclark8328y3

suddenly ur Fps go up and u got insta kill

Gotta love it when you lag in Roblox but be able to still kill people

cap

nope, fps is client sided, they will update your character 60 times per second while you see it update 1 times per second, which makes it 60 times easier TO KILL YOU, not for you to win

in valo my enemy lagged and was still it was easy to take him down u guys are so stupid

Agre

Yeah that's what I thought. I expected the 1 FPS stickman to just be teleporting around the place.

Physics FPS:

In Roblox if you have low fps it affects what the other players see and how your physics works on the game also so if you jump you look like your floating on the other players screen because it looks like your still in the air on your screen so they see it also but from their perspective

​@@SeaBlue0 yeah roblox has a ton of fps related problems, doesn't help that it barely uses RAM yet still nukes fps the moment RAM usage increases and single core support, fortunately as of late they've shoved lighting on the gpu

well, this is actually 1 FPS with NO POWERS.

1 FPS could kill 24 FPS in one hit since his fist immediately teleports into him

24 fps stickman: *spam special ability *

*almost rips 24 fps apart when getting up

1 fps *almost rips 24 fps apart*

1 fps doesn't mean slow, it actually means insanely fast, as a 24 fps stickman takes 48 frames for a 2 second punch, a 1 fps stick would have only 2 frames for a 2 second punch, looking faster

OMG FIRST

Second 🥈

No. It moves at light of speed

How is 1 fps slower? Doesn't matter if it's 1 fps or 492822929, the action will still take the same speed. A movie's length doesn't change at all even if it has 0,1 fps.

1 fps is supposed to move way faster than 24fps but i guess there was confusion or sum oh well

1fps moves at the speed of light

24 fps win not 1 fps

​@@VictorekPL sit, are you able to read? He THOUGHT it WOULD win. NOT he THOUGHT that it ALWAYD won

@@TheSecondLaughingSoldier ahh you noob

​@@TheSecondLaughingSoldierhaha

@@TheSecondLaughingSoldier no HE HOPED HE WOULD WIN not thought he would win.

That’s true, his character has 1 or 2 framed attacks

He would be like : dam this is offensive

FR

Roblox Gay

Instintinho Superiorzinho no u

༒GREG༒ no u

Greg *N O U*

@@greggreg126 everyone but u

It isn't, the person animating didn't understand what 1fps was

Ew the Palestine hater

90 fps!

@@MegaToonzNetwork 100000000000 fps

@@VictorekPL 10000000000000000000 fps

@@MegaToonzNetwork yeah

@@MegaToonzNetwork XD

@@kymanilion4743 Freedom of speech is an often misunderstood concept on the internet. In its purest form, freedom of speech means that people should be allowed to express their opinions without any consequences whatsoever. However, that’s a right that is not recognized anywhere in the world because it leads to illogical results that burden the rights of others. For instance, if your girlfriend chooses to break up with you because she dislikes your ideological views, that is undoubtedly a negative consequence of expressing your free speech, but the notion that society would tolerate free speech forcing her to remain as your girlfriend is patently absurd. If you espouse racially insensitive remarks against a minority client of your companys and are subsequently fired, freedom of speech does not compel your employer to keep you employed. NBC’s Today Show and ABC’s Good Morning America are, similarly, not burdening the free speech rights of minority viewpoints by electing not to allow them to be interviewed on their shows, even if the decision not to, for instance, permit a white nationalist from explaining his/her views, clearly stems from a belief that such views are repugnant. Rather, freedom of speech in the United States and elsewhere is a proscription on the use of government power to burden free speech rights. Examples listed earlier were examples of entirely private conduct being subject to free speech consideration, a result that has never obtained in US courts, nor is it likely to obtain irrespective of whether the Supreme Court is in the hands of liberals or conservatives. Therefore, freedom of speech generally bars the government from penalizing you with jail time or fines for the basic act of expressing your beliefs, and acts as a bar to the government from using its power to enforce a civil judgment. Even then, freedom of speech is not absolute. In the US there are laws that technically limit freedom of speech and expression: Slander, libel, copyright, hate crimes, sedition and treachery for example. The First Amendment raises the bar tremendously as to the burden required to prove each of these actions, but it does not generally create irrebutable presumptions against them. This is why Anwar Al-Awlaki could not simply invoke the First Amendment as a shield for his activities supporting Al Qaeda’s propaganda arm, nor was it an absolute shield from liability for Rolling Stone in its shoddy reporting on campus rape in UVA after the jury had found actual malice. In a more germane example, freedom of speech also does not mean that public policy encourages an unregulated morass on the internet. Thus, Congress specifically recognized the need for online platforms to self-regulate comments in passing the Communications Decency Act of 1996. §230 of the CDA exempts online platforms from the common law republication rule if websites choose to moderate comments on their platforms. As applied to reddit, this means that the decision to or not to moderate a comment does not lead to liability for the website for the thoughts expressed therein. In the specific context of this website, so-called “free speech” advocates have taken free speech and its polar opposite of censorship to mean something that it does not. Regardless of what kn0thing and spez have stated in the past, the development of the site has led to the creation of discrete subreddit communities (as contrasted to the single “front page” that existed at the site’s inception) with different cultures and purposes, all of which the sitewide administrators have sought to lend support to. Thus, a subreddit dedicated to news (such as this one) is within its grant of authority to prohibit submitted “articles” from merely being pictures, or the self-written musings of users themselves. Other subreddits might permit ONLY submissions of that nature, and that’s perfectly fine. Unrestricted free speech would hold that such actions constitute censorship - common sense would hold that these are merely expressions of the specific purpose of the subreddits themselves. Sitewide administrators also require that subreddit moderators enforce sitewide rules prohibiting certain behavior, as listed in the site’s content policy. Free speech is not an excuse to post illegal content, nor is it an excuse that will carry the day if you act in a way that harasses other users (a proscription not recognized by law). In fact, posting of illegal or defamatory content on the site can easily expose someone to criminal or civil liability, and reddit is under no obligation to protect your online identity from entities seeking to subpoena it for liability purposes. Finally, free speech and “censorship” in the context of moderation on subs is also specifically recognized by the sitewide administrators. The content policy also includes a statement on reddit moderators: Individual communities on Reddit may have their own rules in addition to ours and their own moderators to enforce them. Reddit provides tools to aid moderators, but does not prescribe their usage. This enables community moderators to determine for themselves the appropriate rules for their communities on top of sitewide rules that all communities must enforce. That has led to a diversity of subreddits with varying tolerances for content. Some subreddits choose to enforce only the bare minimum, if even that. Others choose to enforce rules that would damn near take a rules lawyer to understand. On /r/nottheonion, we take a middle approach, permitting a wide range of comments as they pertain to civil discourse, but excluding comments that would be uncivil, or offensive. Generally, if users discuss in a manner consistent with how they would discuss matters in the workplace or among a new group of friends, they'd never encounter an issue with moderation. If you believe this to be impermissible censorship, we can only disagree, because the vast majority of users will never be subject to a moderation action, but the site as a whole and the internet in general provide many opportunities for “free speech” that may be free of the reasonable limitations that we find to be necessary to ensure civility. We wish you the best of luck in finding a forum or platform more amenable to your sensibilities, but decline to extend them here.

@@vaclavvancura3494 Dang, you just wrote a whole essay to win an argument, and it worked.

Green is not a creative color. 📔

@@DiegoElDiego2801 Oh no nononono not DHMIS *vietnam flashbacks*

Lime or neon green is my favorite color.