Israel launches strike on Iran: Why Isfahan was targeted
2024 ж. 18 Сәу.
31 526 Рет қаралды
NBC’s Richard Engel joins 'Squawk on the Street' from Jerusalem with the latest news.
NBC’s Richard Engel joins 'Squawk on the Street' from Jerusalem with the latest news.
Cnbc has the right to defend itself against cnn.
what are you talking about, bot are on the same page regarding Isreal. Each agency has competent analysts on the scene.
😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@Bradgilliswhammymanpretty sure it’s only a joke… I don’t think this was a well thought out remark about the analytical reliability of each agency in their respective regards. It was meant to make you laugh.
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
CNBC should focus on business
These countries need Oscars
The toffee Oscar 😅
They both send cucumber rockets
NBC was on the ground, coincidentally.. 🤣
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
" ONLY CRIMINALS DEFEND CRIMINALS ". Gundhi
Isfahan is my sweet home city. It is really beautiful.
A couple of children exchanging slaps.
Anyone else feel the downplay is a front? I want to believe him.. Then he said he wanted to solute the reporter for his neutral reporting. 😅
100%
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
If nothing happened, then why even cover this? This has to be the most unusual strike in the history of modern warfare.
Iran will answer back, they will not fall for Netanyahu's threats, which is something that is coming. Citizens in Israel better leave the country while they still can for their safety , because Israel is trapped between many enemies from which they will no longer be able to escape. We must afraid that an answer from Iran can come any minute of the day, which is something that can no longer be stopped in that region
😁 let’s see if Iran is brave enough to answer back
Iran exposed as weak dictatorship …. Head of the snake is next to leave the mortal coil…💀
Punny little mind,do You think Israel been in the predicament that they are , surrounded by vicious dogs,is going to fold up their arms and allow to be attack the way You think!! Only in your dreams that is going to happen,the moment their very existance is threatened they are going to use their Main weapon,SO ,You don't know crap about Israel's capabilties.
Blackrock knows the attack😢they shortsell😢 it was no attack😢 just show of propaganda
Interesting to see middle eastern countries can meter their responses and deal with their own affairs without American interference or guidance. God forbid we ease off, gotta have our hands in all the pies
What does Iran have to say on the matter?
Zero chance he’s in Israel. That’s a green screen lol
Jam Creamer is mentally deficient?
Wow propaganda for Israel..... All attack on Iran just three little drone😂
Ya, only 3 drones shot. No America, no Britain& no Jordon. ISRAEL HAD ITS Vr Croones.
Nonsense you are a propagandist for Iran
LOL you have zero clue... Those three little drones got in and hit a target vs Iran shooting 300 things and missing every target. they can hit you in your bed
You just said three little drone?
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
Good Ratio..
How many protests until peace?
Tell Isreal to stop building settlements in Gaza and allow a 2 state solution, which Bibi is currently unwilling to consider. Otherwise this conflict goes on for the next 1000 years.
@@Bradgilliswhammyman2 state solution was already tried. Didn't work. Got any other suggestions? Lol
How is this different than prehistoric tribes fighting each other?
It’s not, it’s Human Nature
3 little drones made a HUGE statement enough that Iran remembers to sit the heck down and accepted that Israel is no nation to mess with! God is with Israel! ❤🇮🇱
Iran should show restraint
Israel should change its attitude
be aware of new york and michingan.
game theory
The Genocide Continues, but MSDNC would rather cover the tick-tock.
Wash face after bed then read news
Isabella is trying to pull us into another pointless conflict
It's a real shame when in this day and age one can't be allowed to name a country by it's actual name.
@@CL-gv2fx it is 😥
It wasn't a strike if it was just 3 drones (which also happened to be shot down by Iran) or does the IDF need Iran to teach them how to use drones? 😅
What will Iran do now ? 😁 it was just a message from Israel
@zainiboy13 Iran's response: Tell me the Israelis don't know how to use a drone without telling me they actually don't.
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
The world is becoming top heavy. We all know what happens to top heavy things. 🤦♂️
Good to see everyone pushing for de-escalation (other than the right wing crazies in the U.S. and Israel frothing to send our troops to war). Let's push to make the difficult choices going forward and start working towards a solution in the middle east
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
Israel has a right to defend itself from attacks by Iran or anyone else.
That was retaliation (offense) not defense. Learn the difference!
Israel is the one attacking everyone
@georgecarberry9222 Yes we have seen, against children/elderly/females/doctors/aid workers/hostages
@@LXT43 Iran started it by attacked Israel embassy in the 90's.
And so do the indigenous native Palestinians
Anas b. Malik reported that Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said: The Dajjal would be followed by seventy thousand Jews of Isfahan wearing Persian shawls.
😂😂😂😂
You even don't know where is esfahan 😂you can use Google maps its 7 h far from Tehran driving
I think Israel wanted to show Iran is impotent. Iran launched their flying mopeds and missiles. Israel shot 99 percent of them down. Israel launched some small response and I guess it hit something. I think they wanted to make a point, that they have great air defense and that Iran is essentially impotent in regard to a traditional battlefield war.
Exactly
Israel did not shoot 99% of them down. Israel plus the US, UK and half of the Middle East shot them down. And they told them 3 days ahead of time it was coming and sent them at slow speeds. It was a fireworks show. What a way to change the narrative away from reality.
About the same amount of damage was done by each side. Iran used 1% of its arsenal and gave the US a heads up it only cost millions. Israel's unsustainable defense cost billions and was only successful because the US stepped in and shot a majority of the missiles down, because they were given that advanced warning.
You really believe they shot down 99%? 😂
Iraan got a lesson, they will never do what they did
Yea,they just gonna sit around and wait for Israel to do whatever they want..
Oh my god you're ignorant and ill informed.
@@ivanmilosavljevic6077Haha lol
Drone Attack it strick? 😂😂😂😂😂
heheheh Iran will never do as what Israel did. Iran will never learn as Israel try to get learn Iran.
U r correct. Eiron would never commit #genocide
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.
When the 3 drones does more damage than the 300 hyoer sonic missiles..you know your which god to not worship for sure!! Just sayn..its extremely Obvious
Amen 🙏🏻
About the same amount of damage was done by each side. One spent billions, the other spent millions. The only god being used here is money, which one side definitely worships.
@@zainiboy13 Thank you brother..Truth is Life!! Life is the Light! The true Light of this world..Jesus Christ
@@BobSacamano666 🙂 Hush satan..lol your time is Short!! GET ready
They really lost their mind striking a nuclear facility Israel's leader really lost his mind
No, Iran & it's proxies have lost their minds!
No, Iran & it's proxies have lost their minds!!!
Iran has lost their minds!! 🇮🇱
They did not strike a nuclear facility. You have lost your mind.
@@OriginalCoastalDistancing that was close enough
Iran has the right to defend itself.
Iran doesn't have the right to self defense. They are a terrorist state!
No, I disagree! They don't have that right!
Lol
Lol
@@erinkay4910 its the nasis or should i say Ashkenazi khazar
Good joke 😂😂😂 I came here for news... next time I need to hear joke I will visit your channel
These people know nothing all they do read scripts they boring as hell blocked
The reason why I will never support the government of Israel, and neither should you . During the 1970s and 1980s, there were reports and allegations that Israel provided military support and weapons to the apartheid regime in South Africa. The apartheid regime in South Africa enforced a system of racial segregation and discrimination, oppressing the majority black population in the country. Here are some key points regarding the allegations of Israeli support to the South African apartheid regime: 1. **Military Cooperation**: There were reports of military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during the apartheid era. Israel allegedly provided military equipment, technology, and expertise to the South African government. 2. **Allegations of Arms Sales**: There were allegations that Israel sold weapons, including military aircraft, armored vehicles, and ammunition, to the apartheid regime in South Africa. These sales were reportedly used by the South African government to suppress internal dissent and opposition to apartheid policies. 3. **Political Motivations**: The alleged military cooperation between Israel and South Africa during this period was influenced by various factors, including shared security interests, geopolitical considerations, and a common perception of threats in their respective regions. 4. **International Criticism**: The reported military cooperation between Israel and the apartheid regime in South Africa drew international criticism and condemnation. Many countries and organizations viewed such support as contributing to the perpetuation of human rights abuses and oppression in South Africa. 5. **End of Apartheid**: With the end of apartheid in the early 1990s and the establishment of a democratic government in South Africa, these allegations of Israeli support to the apartheid regime became a subject of historical scrutiny and criticism. It is important to note that the details and extent of Israeli support to the apartheid regime in South Africa during that period remain a subject of historical debate and controversy. The allegations have been a point of criticism for Israel's foreign policy during that era and have been cited as an example of international support for oppressive regimes. Copy paste and share. Israel's health ministry is investigating claims that Ethiopian women are being injected with a controversial contraceptive without their knowledge or consent. Thousands of Ethiopian women are said to be receiving shots of Depo-Provera every three months in Israeli clinics. The contraceptive stops menstruation and has been linked to fertility problems and osteoporosis. Yaakov Litzman, Israel's deputy minister of health, who has previously denied the practice, will lead the inquiry, a spokesperson announced on Wednesday. The phenomenon was uncovered when social workers noticed the birth rate among Ethiopian immigrants halving in a decade. An Israeli documentary investigating the scandal was aired in December and prompted a popular outcry. It revealed that women were started on a course of contraceptive jabs while still in transit camps in Ethiopia, some without being told they were being given birth control and many having no idea of the side-effects. When they eventually arrived in Israel, doctors continued the treatment unquestioningly. But the critical question remains unanswered as to who instigated the policy, with neither Israel nor Ethiopia willing to claim responsibility. Sava Reuben, an Ethiopian who has lived in Israel since 1984, interviewed more than 35 women from her community for the film and found that 25 were still receiving contraceptive shots from healthcare providers. Reuben spoke to one woman who believed she had been given a flu vaccination and had no idea she had been injected with Depo-Provera. Another was pregnant with her fifth child when she arrived in the transit camp, where she would live for seven years. The woman in her thirties told Reuben that officials had gathered together all the new mothers in the camp and told them they would be given Depo-Provera as it would be too difficult for them to give birth Israel. "No, we didn't want to take it, we refused. We said we didn't want it," the unnamed woman recalls in the film. She agreed to the injections only because she was told her immigration to Israel would be blocked and she would receive no further healthcare in the camps if she refused. "This happened to many, many other women," Reuben said. More than 50,000 Ethiopian Jews have immigrated to Israel in the past decade. The fast-growing community has struggled against bias. In 1996, thousands rioted when it was discovered that the Israeli health ministry had destroyed all stocks of blood donated by Ethiopians on the grounds that it might be contaminated with HIV. Israel's health ministry has strongly denied allegations that the injections are part of a policy to control the growth of the Ethiopian community. "The Israel ministry of health neither advises nor encourages the use of Depo-Provera injections and if they are being administered this is in despite of our view," a spokesperson said. And yet Reuben claims to have discovered a letter from the health ministry to a clinic in Ethiopia in 2000 thanking doctors there for the large numbers of women they had treated with Depo-Provera. "Why are only Ethiopian women being given Depo-Provera in Israel? It's supposed to be a last-resort contraceptive. Israeli health authorities claim the injections are a cultural preference but in our culture, to have lots of children is to be rich," Reuben said. "It is my opinion that this is a deliberate policy on the part of Israel. They are taking advantage of women who are weak because they are new to the country, do not understand the language and who traditionally respect authority. It makes me more than angry." Dr Mushira Aboodia, a gynaecologist working at Jerusalem's Hadassah medical centre, said the majority of Ethiopian women she had met received Depo-Provera injections. "This is a policy that no one will admit. No one in Israel will take responsibility for the treatment in the camps but someone must have instigated it and it would not be in Ethiopia's interests to treat women preparing to leave the country," Aboodia said. "Something is definitely wrong here. I'm very glad the ministry of health will be investigating the issue. They will need to do a thorough job." A message from Betsy Reed, editor of the Guardian US I hope you appreciated this article. Before you move on, I wanted to ask if you would consider supporting the Guardian’s journalism during one of the most consequential news cycles of our lifetimes. From Elon Musk to the Murdochs, a small number of billionaire owners have a powerful hold on so much of the information that reaches the public about what’s happening in the world. The Guardian is different. We have no billionaire owner or shareholders to consider. Our journalism is produced to serve the public interest - not profit motives. And we avoid the trap that befalls much US media: the tendency, born of a desire to please all sides, to engage in false equivalence in the name of neutrality. We always strive to be fair. But sometimes that means calling out the lies of powerful people and institutions - and making clear how misinformation and demagoguery can damage democracy. From threats to election integrity, to the spiralling climate crisis, to complex foreign conflicts, our journalists contextualise, investigate and illuminate the critical stories of our time. As a global news organisation with a robust US reporting staff, we’re able to provide a fresh, outsider perspective - one so often missing in the American media bubble. Around the world, readers can access the Guardian’s paywall-free journalism because of our unique reader-supported model. That’s because of people like you. Our readers keep us independent, beholden to no outside influence and accessible to everyone - whether they can afford to pay for news, or not.