How to Read (and Understand) Hard Books

2023 ж. 13 Қар.
255 893 Рет қаралды

Right now, the first 500 people to use my link will get a one month free trial of Skillshare: skl.sh/jaredhenderson11231
This is a guide to reading and understanding your books. Most of what I say is based on Mortimer Adler's book 'How to Read a Book', which I highly recommend to anyone who wants to get serious about reading. Aside from the four levels of reading, Adler's book goes over the differences between reading fiction, different types of non-fiction (history, philosophy, etc.), and practical books.
You might also want to check out my videos on note-taking: • Taking Notes
→ Books
How to Read a Book: amzn.to/3QGJe8i
Why Orwell Matters: amzn.to/3ugf44s
Main Currents of Marxism: amzn.to/3QYBUGz
→ Music
Original music by The Music Giant
Get custom music created for your content: www.themusicgiant.com/content...
→ Video Gear
Mic: amzn.to/3Uw7ZVw
Recorder: amzn.to/3Tz1uQp
Camera: amzn.to/3Ust3MT
Camera (upgrade): amzn.to/3EFGW4e
Lens: amzn.to/3WXbAhd
Lens (upgrade): amzn.to/3SA49KM
These are affiliate links with Amazon. The channel earns a commission from each purchase - but it doesn't cost you anything.

Пікірлер
  • A few notes: 1. Hitchens isn't the hardest author to read, but his book served as a decent example for the purposes of this video (and I had the book ready at hand). 2. Throughout, I mentioned synoptical reading - but Adler wrote about syntopical reading. A helpful commenter corrected me (and apparently many others have made that mistake).

    @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • "decent"? I beg to differ

      @boogerie@boogerie6 ай бұрын
    • @@boogerie Ha Ha Dig into Hitch - 22 will do nicely. : )))))

      @timbushell8640@timbushell86406 ай бұрын
    • First I want to express to you a big thank you for your videos and what you are shearing. I’m am a scholar on marxism and I want to thank you by giving you some name to search and read about classical or critical marxism, Rose Luxemburg may be the first and so Gyorgy Lucakz and Hebert Marcuse, these tree take Marx’s theory of use value and make that the center of the critical marxism facing against readings such as the social-democrat and the imperialist ones and also against the historical and the quantitative reading of The Capital. These tree place at the center of the discussion the live of the human kind and the theory of systemic crisis for the capitalism, as a trend that started with the law of capitalist accumulation something that shows perfectly Bolivar Echeverria. Those four are the best to catch a whole view of what is at stake, history as a process happening to everyone and no future is a certain destiny.

      @DanJetro@DanJetro6 ай бұрын
    • Hitchen and his faulty arguments

      @romelimmense@romelimmense6 ай бұрын
    • ⁠@@romelimmenseHe insulted your imaginary friend, did he?

      @G_Demolished@G_Demolished5 ай бұрын
  • Brb grabbing my copy of green eggs and ham real quick

    @Onkruid@Onkruid6 ай бұрын
    • Be sure to take notes!

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • 😂

      @ryanthegreat805@ryanthegreat8056 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for the laugh! You made my day!

      @lpeek56@lpeek566 ай бұрын
    • You are very welcome! Have a nice day :)@@lpeek56

      @Onkruid@Onkruid6 ай бұрын
    • For real though ‘oh the places you’ll go’ by Seuss almost had me weeping in my daughters lap at bed time I swear 😂

      @KeytarArgonian@KeytarArgonian6 ай бұрын
  • Superficial reading Analytical reading -classify the book -x-ray the book(skimming+pre reading) -come to terms with the author -determine the message - criticize the book fairly - determine your own conclusion

    @kimjennielol@kimjennielol6 ай бұрын
    • use one space after each dash. please

      @corgikun2579@corgikun25795 ай бұрын
    • @@corgikun2579 hey- what's a dash?

      @Gigusx@Gigusx4 ай бұрын
    • ​​@@corgikun2579 He did. In the last points 😂

      @sillumats2@sillumats24 ай бұрын
    • ​@@corgikun2579it is very sad

      @Spark_Square@Spark_Square3 ай бұрын
    • Lost it at mid analytical....and I was at 1.5x speed😅

      @shaneisaac1184@shaneisaac11842 ай бұрын
  • I discovered Mortimer Adler’s How To Read a Book in high school. It totally changed my life. It was like finding the key to a better world.

    @leonalmeida858@leonalmeida8582 ай бұрын
  • 00:01 Learn how to get the most out of what you read 01:35 To understand a book, first figure out what it is about. 03:07 Pre-reading a book helps you understand what it's about and feel more comfortable. 04:43 Analytical reading involves diving deep into a book and taking thorough notes. 06:22 Understanding the structure of a hard book is crucial for effective reading. 08:00 Understanding the author's main message and defining key terms is crucial for deeply reading non-fiction books. 09:39 Identifying specific ways Orwell has been misinterpreted and still matters in the 21st century. 11:23 Final pronouncement about a book should be complex and nuanced, even if you disagree with it. Crafted by Merlin AI.

    @mrinalkrant2523@mrinalkrant2523Ай бұрын
  • I read a lot of hard academic books. I find returning to them even years later really help me, perhaps because I know more or perhaps because I have different questions to ask of the books. I think 'Why am I reading this book?' is as important question as 'What is this book about?'

    @Tymbus@Tymbus6 ай бұрын
    • That's a very good point. Having a reason for reading the book helps you get the most out of it, especially if you're motivated to answer a particular question.

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • Hey drop a reading list?

      @wayneqwele8847@wayneqwele88473 ай бұрын
  • i believe this aligns with plato’s and socrates encouragement of critical thinking when it came to education…they often criticized the focus on just memorization rather than drawing your own conclusions and asking deeper questions.

    @jonryan9577@jonryan95774 ай бұрын
  • Thank you. I’ve read Adler and Van Doran’s “How to Read a Book” many times. Your video here helped me understand its contents even more.

    @ChrisGBaker@ChrisGBaker5 ай бұрын
  • your channel is amazing!!! I loved this video as an english student who loves classics but struggles outside of class

    @jessicaweldon199@jessicaweldon1994 ай бұрын
  • I really enjoyed this video. That Adlee book is great. I'd love to see you do a similar video focused on reading fiction, since this video was so focused on nonfiction.

    @LiterateTexan@LiterateTexan6 ай бұрын
  • GREAT vid Jared, it actually to recheck the book I've written and answer the questions the other way around . THANKS 👏🏽

    @Geemeel1@Geemeel16 ай бұрын
  • I’ve been presenting on Adler’s book to the Upper School students of the school I teach at. Love the video.

    @ethanlafont5073@ethanlafont50736 ай бұрын
  • Very nice presentation on how to read books. I appreciate your short and concise presentation. I have problems with long, drawn out, and detail explanations. Which is why I have problems with reading and understanding long writings.

    @duckbizniz663@duckbizniz6635 ай бұрын
  • I've just ordered the book...thanks for your very helpful advice 👍

    @Doctor.T.46@Doctor.T.466 ай бұрын
  • i found this book recently on a self-study philosophy reading list and i thought it would be dreadfully boring but i'm enjoying it so far! i'm working on the 'how to read philosophy' section right now. i'm glad that you posted this and i found your channel! looking forward to watching your other content

    @bookofthedeadinternet@bookofthedeadinternetАй бұрын
  • Steps are unclear. I am now a philosopher

    @mohandalansari534@mohandalansari5343 ай бұрын
  • Thank you. I've read the book from Adler and was trying to distill it. You have done the work for me.

    @cgestraviz@cgestraviz5 ай бұрын
  • It's really helpful. Thank you for this! ❤

    @parthavikarn3475@parthavikarn34752 ай бұрын
  • I'm so glad you picked Hitchens's book for this video. I love Hitch and Orwell, and really enjoyed this read, though I feel I should revisit it soon 🤔

    @tricaurelie@tricaurelie4 ай бұрын
  • For me language is often the atumbling block. Philosophers and theologians like naming things and don't often care if someone else used the same name in a slightly different context. Pobably the most difficult book I have, attemptedz to read was feom colege - Meaning of Christ, a Mahayana Buddhist Point of View. You basically had to learn a new language if you weren't well versed in Buddhist thought. I might give Goedel, Escher and Bach another shot at some point. But like all reading, knowing what you are getting into before you start can be a big plus.

    @EricMcLuen@EricMcLuen6 ай бұрын
  • I read fiction in copious quantities due to a lonely childhood and continued well into adulthood. I only began reading non- fiction a decade ago and have struggled with it. It's not the words of concepts. sci-fi and fantasy have a lot of interesting topics to ponder. It's the style and the intent. The style was animated, and you immersed yourself in it. Non- fiction is dry, often, full of facts you are supposed to remember, and the intent is to inform. But I'll get it. And I'm glad there are resources online to help

    @WilliamDavis-lf5bq@WilliamDavis-lf5bq4 ай бұрын
    • If you're interested, I've just learned of "book stacking", which is just reading a hard book until you're not able to keep your attention on it, then switching to an easier book.

      @SpectrumOfChange@SpectrumOfChangeАй бұрын
  • Love the subtle plug for Ali

    @MrTylerhenry8@MrTylerhenry86 ай бұрын
  • this is very helpful! thank you.

    @raghad-cw9eq@raghad-cw9eq6 ай бұрын
  • I really appreciated this video! I’ve recently picked up a book by Fanon that I’ve been struggling with. I look forward from starting over using the approach you’ve outlined here. Cheers!

    @naeshelle@naeshelle5 ай бұрын
    • Dont read Fanon, read Marx. Fanon is what you get when someone doesnt read the primary theory and incorrectly expands on it.

      @andreassvoboda595@andreassvoboda5954 ай бұрын
  • Gracias, very useful recommendations! Best regards from México!

    @emp294@emp2943 ай бұрын
  • From what you said it looks like I’ve been doing analytical + synoptical. I go through a book underling, highlighting and annotated bits that I feel are important and then I go over them multiple times after I finish the book. I also make sure to read books surrounding the same topic to drive it home.

    @GOD_NEON@GOD_NEON2 ай бұрын
  • I really like your paraphrase 10:32, of Adler and Van Doren's more prolix rule.

    @christiancacibauda5512@christiancacibauda55125 ай бұрын
  • Just got the adler book used for $5. thanks keep the content coming.

    @dapperninji646@dapperninji6466 ай бұрын
  • This is great. Im a physics student and the deeper element of understanding physics, is generally mathematics. I have struggled with finding a way of really understanding pure philosophy so this should be very helpful.

    @elendor3428@elendor34283 ай бұрын
  • I discovered your videos recently during my height of curiosity about stoicism. Watching your content, I can’t help to think that they will be a perfect fit for Nebula. Great job btw, Jared. Truly a rare creator in this landscape

    @Phoppa@Phoppa6 ай бұрын
    • Nebula would be the dream one day.

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • @@_jared Whenever you seek something to read, remember: Basic Information Before Leaving Earth = B I B L E (KJV) and a search: BIBLE + FREEMASONRY.

      @theharshtruthoutthere@theharshtruthoutthere3 ай бұрын
  • Just got done with a midterm for a course on Kant and The Critique of Pure Reason here at UCLA - these books are no joke… Thanks for ur practical tips fellow philosopher 🙌🙏🤘

    @authenticmanstan797@authenticmanstan7976 ай бұрын
    • That's a brutal midterm. Hope it went well!

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • I naively enrolled in “The Life and Work of James Joyce” at UCLA. I still think about that class. It’s been twenty-three years. 🙃

      @shalimarlittle8374@shalimarlittle83745 ай бұрын
    • ​@@_jaredcould you please do some chapters for this video? 😢😅

      @johnmanole4779@johnmanole47795 ай бұрын
    • @@_jared it was a brutal class - coming back to this after my final exam... came up quick yet I believe I learned alot as my professor was Tyler Burge who has his own interpretations

      @authenticmanstan797@authenticmanstan7975 ай бұрын
  • This is one of the channels that gave me the courage to start my KZhead channel 8 months ago about self development. Now I have 1,056 subs and > 800 hours of watch time. I know it’s not comparable with others but I’m still proud I started because I’ve been learning so many lessons that I could haven’t learned without getting started in the 1st place.

    @nathananderson8720@nathananderson87205 ай бұрын
    • Well done bro, I subbed

      @ram42@ram423 ай бұрын
    • @@ram42 Whoever you are, I don't know you personally but I can say that you're one of the non-judgmental and open-minded people who is not fixated on tangible or external factors in order to learn from someone like me. Just because someone doesn't have a piece of paper as a credential, doesn't mean that person is not entitled to share personal experiences with the hope & intention to inspire others. Keep up with whatever it is that you're doing to improve mankind or improving your life even to a slight degree each day. This is just one part of a bigger puzzle for creating my KZhead channel about holistic health. I literally could have died back when I was 14 years old due to major depression but here I am right now replying to you, a KZheadr, who's full of fulfillment and dedication to help others to be a better version of themselves. I ain't better than anyone else but my old self. That's all that really makes this KZhead thing more meaningful and enjoyable. Thanks so much for your support! I am hoping that you can join me with this endless personal development journey! :)

      @nathananderson8720@nathananderson87203 ай бұрын
    • make some fuckin awesome vids man, im cheering for you@@nathananderson8720

      @ram42@ram423 ай бұрын
    • Congrats my man, that first part of creating something and getting it off the ground is the hardest part.

      @SpectrumOfChange@SpectrumOfChangeАй бұрын
    • @@SpectrumOfChange Thank you for taking the time to show your support! I wasted years of my life pursuing what I thought could fulfill me. I was lost as hell. I was searching for a feeling of purpose, being appreciated, being loved in many different wrong places such as career achievements, clubs, others’ opinions, etc. I worked hard for many years to graduate and have a stable high paying job and acquired most of the materialistic pursuits I’ve ever wanted but that spike of happiness didn’t last until I had enough and started to ask myself many existential questions that truly make this life matters and that’s when I got out of severe depression and actually experience how it is to be fully alive rather that being like a puppet and just let my life pass me by. So many sacrifices are needed to actually attain the authentic life I was scared of facing for so many years so that I can stay in my comfort zone but be miserable. I will be uploading videos that I hope can inspire others as well. It takes time but I will never stop.

      @nathananderson8720@nathananderson8720Ай бұрын
  • Thank you❤ I am struggling to focus on academic books again, after few years now.

    @caglabatur@caglabatur4 ай бұрын
  • Your voice is really soothing

    @gabiocampos@gabiocampos6 ай бұрын
  • Before I dove into Montaigne's Essays I read the OUP "Short Introduction" to him and Sarah Bakewell's fantastic bio of him, "How To Live". I wanted to make sure I understood his point of view by understanding who he was.

    @ericsierra-franco7802@ericsierra-franco78026 ай бұрын
  • Thank you😊 bro😅 I needed to know this

    @caruto4279@caruto42794 ай бұрын
  • Thank you! I’m taking an anthropology class and an Astronomy course in college at the same time right now and I felt overwhelmed about getting started. This helps ❤

    @Charley-Charley@Charley-Charley3 ай бұрын
  • Hey can you do a video on the writing process for argumentative papers in philosophy? What is your writing process? How do you organize and synthesize your ideas? Do you use the index card method?

    @l.d.m.33@l.d.m.333 ай бұрын
  • Good video, nice explanation.

    @christopherlees1134@christopherlees11342 ай бұрын
  • Thank you so much.❤❤❤

    @anthenehbeze.@anthenehbeze.5 ай бұрын
  • Thank you, sir.

    @aparnagiridharan2825@aparnagiridharan2825Ай бұрын
  • Thanks for tremendous information .For whose love books !!

    @martinnogales2259@martinnogales22595 ай бұрын
  • this is very helpful . growing up I had a very strong desier to read but had no direction on what to read based on my interests . my parents weren't readers . I only read a few books in school and felt very frustrated that I couldn't find anything I like based off of what I new existed which was nothing really.. I eventually was pointed in a direction of a co-worker on Arthur c clark . since then I have read and listened on audible 13 books and currently reading 3 on sci-fi ,history ,bio, fiction and classics .that was a big difference then only 3 books in all of school . I'm devouring books on the history of Mesopotamia at the moment and loving it . I wish I had someone to guide me when I was younger because on how little time I have now ...... oh how I relate to the twilight zone episode even more now

    @MuzeTitaN@MuzeTitaN3 күн бұрын
  • I appreciate they're anagrams, but Adler wrote about syntopical reading, not synoptical reading. Syntopical = same topic.

    @RichardCarter@RichardCarter6 ай бұрын
    • Oh my goodness - I read that word wrong every single time. I assumed he was calling it synoptical because it lets you get a general view of a subject. I appreciate the correction!

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • ​@@_jaredI have been doing the same thing 😅

      @JonStallings@JonStallings6 ай бұрын
    • To be honest, I only noticed because I made the same mistake when I posted a review on my website.

      @RichardCarter@RichardCarter6 ай бұрын
    • eh Wow. sharp!! thanks for this and thanks to Jared anyways, because , as a starter, the difference is now clear to me. Great work to both of you 🙌🏽

      @Geemeel1@Geemeel16 ай бұрын
    • @@_jared ha ha ha ha. We all have crosses to bear. : ))))) At least consistent.

      @timbushell8640@timbushell86406 ай бұрын
  • Great video!

    @TJWild1@TJWild16 ай бұрын
  • your voice is calming asl

    @702_rfl@702_rfl2 ай бұрын
  • I bought this book after seeing it in a few videos and I am really happy I did, it's a great book.

    @catherinesacademiastudio4804@catherinesacademiastudio4804Ай бұрын
  • 🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 *📚 Understanding hard books is a common challenge even for advanced readers.* 00:29 *📖 There are four types of reading: Elementary, Inspectional, Analytical, and Syntopical.* 01:53 *🧐 Before diving into a book, conduct an inspection to understand its content, table of contents, and introduction.* 04:00 *✍️ During the superficial read, quickly skim the text without stopping to ponder or look up unknown terms.* 05:37 *📖 Analytical reading involves deep engagement with the text, making thorough annotations, and taking detailed notes.* 08:41 *🔍 Define key terms used by the author to fully understand the text's message.* 09:37 *📝 Identify the author's message by analyzing specific arguments and evidence presented.* 10:31 *🤔 Critically assess the book by considering its arguments, exploring counterarguments, and forming your own conclusions.* 12:07 *📚 Syntopical reading involves comparing multiple books on the same subject to understand different perspectives and arguments.*

    @nunyabidness6820@nunyabidness68202 ай бұрын
  • Great content

    @Cinematickols@Cinematickols4 ай бұрын
  • Not gonna lie 👉🏻 I'm loving this channel! ❤

    @SomeoneStillLearning@SomeoneStillLearning4 ай бұрын
  • This needs to be a 5 parter. The 1st two steps, the 3rd step in part 2, then the 4th step in part 3. VIDS 4 and 5, apply to Animal Farm keeping synoptical to part 5. Keep working, and i know how hard it is--daunting even, on the presentation with upping graphics. 2 thumbs up.

    @robertgerrity878@robertgerrity8785 ай бұрын
  • I'm not native speaker of english language, so i think im able to give you an interesting facts bout reading english literature in original. As a big fan of George Orwell I used to dream bout reading his novels in the original language. Once, I bought a book with his stories and there was his famous piece ,,Animal farm". I remember that when I had read this novel before (in my native, polish language), I had not seen a lot of interesting things in this masterpiece. First of all I had headache because of strange and old vocabulary that he used, like specialized words from farms. Secondly I had not thought that it would be so difficult to read this (because in polish It semmed to be quite easy). So, what can I add? Greetings from Poland, you have great literature!😊

    @mioszjaroszewicz9146@mioszjaroszewicz91466 ай бұрын
  • already gave this feedback but i always found the music a tad loud i prefer if its lower thanks love ur videos

    @Nick-qp7to@Nick-qp7to6 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for letting me know!

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • @@_jared Thank you for lowering the background music in your future videos.

      @motorbikeray@motorbikeray6 ай бұрын
  • Thanks Jared...

    @Duplicate01174@Duplicate011745 ай бұрын
  • *5:37* analytical *5:56* the steps

    @C.Mousse@C.Mousse4 ай бұрын
  • Man I've seen this book pop up in my recommendations to read. But I wasn't sure if I should give it a try. After this video I think I should.

    @KimmySang@KimmySangАй бұрын
  • I loved this video

    @TheBusinessHandyMan@TheBusinessHandyMan4 ай бұрын
  • It would be great if you could make a video on comprehension of philosophical texts

    @Rupesh1562@Rupesh15626 ай бұрын
  • Would love a video like this but for fiction!

    @andrew_240@andrew_2406 ай бұрын
  • Thank you 🖤. I have a question: the academy requires us to read not just one, but many hard books simultaneously. How can we manage that? I aspire to be a profound and comprehensive reader, which takes time. However, I also want to read all the books assigned by my professors, and since it requires even more time, I often feel pressured to read faster. Unfortunately, this doesn’t always allow me to delve deeply into the content. I would love to see one of your videos discussing this!

    @alvarojesusbecerragonzalez6673@alvarojesusbecerragonzalez66734 ай бұрын
  • I read a lot Understand very very little But nothing compares to the feeling of answering "yes" to the question of have read so and so.And at this juncture the "very very little understanding"" of the book gleams "I have understood quite a bit there". At this point one goes back to the book and tries harder and here only 2 things may occur either RIP or plethora of "eurekas". Book is to be read. Reading book is to be booked and be hooked.

    @abooswalehmosafeer173@abooswalehmosafeer1733 ай бұрын
  • Another excellent guide for reading is Susan Wise Bauer's The Well-Educated Mind. She goes a little more in-depth on the various subjects than Adler does.

    @floorshirts6402@floorshirts64026 ай бұрын
    • I hadn't heard of this one. I'll check it out!

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • Yeah, I definitely think it's worth reading it alongside Adler. She has three sections on Fiction, Drama, and Poetry that are really helpful.

      @floorshirts6402@floorshirts64026 ай бұрын
  • Very useful and insightful video. I have just realised that I have been reading my course textbooks wrong for some time. I used to try and read them in the same way that I read a novel. This video really opened my eyes!

    @raskarl@raskarl5 ай бұрын
  • I'd love to hear you walk through the same steps for a work of fiction.

    @raswartz@raswartz6 ай бұрын
  • Hitchens was such a profound intellect! Me ruminating: I wonder if Harold Bloom agrees with Mortimer Adler in his "How to Read and Why." Future topic?

    @davidleonard8547@davidleonard85476 ай бұрын
  • My philosophy teacher last year tortured my class. He had us read a bunch of Hegel and Feaubach. I wish those reads on my worst enemy.

    @josephr2941@josephr29416 ай бұрын
  • Now I understand the appeal to post modern styles of writing a book.

    @jsrjsr@jsrjsr3 ай бұрын
  • I remember a time back in the 70’s & 80’s when everyone read the “hard books”, discussed them deeply, re-read, were committed to ideas, etc. I don’t even see that at the university anymore. People know a lot of names & titles, but they’re mostly not into it. Years ago we would’ve never thought of Orwell as difficult. Hegel was difficult; maybe Kant; Joyce; we read things like Foucault and Derrida and Deluze like it was simple fun. Shakespeare was just automatic. The great poets were read. People years ago were just made of different stuff.

    @Zendogg702@Zendogg7024 ай бұрын
    • I took a class on the evolution of children's literature, yes, language and understanding have greatly changed. Reading the old stuff was actually pretty challenging understanding the language and descriptions that could go on for half a page or more. I would think, is this actually for kids? Gave it to some friends, ask them to read a random page, and they'd be just as confused. I think with the advancement of technology, being able to paint a picture of a scene with words, elaborate descriptions lost favor due to being able to just make a TV show or cartoon to express a similar idea. Literature has greatly declined, because it's become a business, either super generic fantasy for men or a dumb romance/YA more generic gaslighting mystery/romance that women are into. Most stuff being written now is terrible because writers are too full of themselves and keep doing ridiculous deconstruction of the genres or re-imagining instead of attempting write something good. The fundamentals of story have been lost with overanalysis, the hero with a 1000 faces wasn't meant to be a "how to" but understanding the structure of the stories we've enjoyed. That's the main reason why reading sucks now, too much garbage gets put out, and it becomes difficult finding the actual gems worth reading.

      @gilbertoflores7397@gilbertoflores73974 ай бұрын
    • @@gilbertoflores7397 Good observation. Digital media seem catastrophic to higher cognition in the short term. I had always said the internet & digital interface systems are not for us people of today, but for a generation way in advance of us.. a generation that will know how to use it to radically increase and optimize human skills and abilities, like no generation before. In the meantime I’m content to stay with the great books.

      @Zendogg702@Zendogg7024 ай бұрын
  • Another good book, which I had to pause Adler’s book to read, is Norman Lewis’ book “how to read better and faster”. This one will teach you how to read anything, faster and better for real, with actionable and measurable exercises. So I’ll read that first and then Adler.

    @shawnmclean7707@shawnmclean77079 сағат бұрын
  • "Gravity's Rainbow" by Thomas Pynchon broke my brain.

    @ubiktd4064@ubiktd40644 ай бұрын
  • Thanks from Ethiopia. Hitchens is awesome

    @samboss2091@samboss20912 ай бұрын
  • Wow! Let me just say that besides the fact that you shared very valuable content, you articulate yourself in a very interesting way. Is there perhaps a method you use to ensure that you articulate yourself or your content in this specifically attention drawing manner?

    @The-prosperity-Hub@The-prosperity-HubАй бұрын
  • Great video thank you 😊 do you read the book the first time without analyzing and only light annotation and then read the book again? Thank you!

    @lovelyindeed4526@lovelyindeed45262 ай бұрын
  • Hello Jared, I'm a beginner in reading and right now I am reading while listening to an audiobook simultaneously. What do you think about this? Is it good? By the way, I just feel that I want to be a writer someday. Any advice? I'm currently working as a software engineer but I want to read a lot of books first before starting to create my first fiction book.

    @self-taughtprogrammer1779@self-taughtprogrammer17796 ай бұрын
  • Excellent video! Would you say synoptical analysis is along the lines of writing a review of literature? That’s what came to mind.

    @Johanna_reads@Johanna_reads6 ай бұрын
    • That’s certainly related. When I wrote my dissertation, I had to read every relevant article and book and write a proposal assessing the state of the debate, and in order to do that I had to be engaging in that kind of reading.

      @_jared@_jared6 ай бұрын
    • ​@_jared It isnironic that one can spend more time explaining what the issue of the debate actually is than providing a response.

      @EricMcLuen@EricMcLuen6 ай бұрын
  • If i want to learn about a new topic....i read it's Wikipedia article first.....and from there i explore some more about that topic.....youtube and even facebook is also quite informative and enlightening.

    @fpvillegas9084@fpvillegas9084Ай бұрын
  • I am a new subscriber 😊😊

    @PoetlaureateNFDL@PoetlaureateNFDL3 ай бұрын
  • I used to read a lot of books. As I got older I lost the habit. Looking back I used to have a rocking chair. There was a stack of books next to it. It was like a reading station. Considering bringing that back.

    @socraticproblem86@socraticproblem865 ай бұрын
  • Off topic, but your voice + mic settings are great. If you don't mind me asking, what editing software do you use to get your voice so clear?

    @Test-dr2dw@Test-dr2dw3 ай бұрын
  • after I noticed the clicking sound after each zoom in and out, I can't not notice it anymore

    @antontaun@antontaun3 ай бұрын
  • Yay no dumb AI voice or mass produced documentary junk. Thank you for your topic, excellent locution and badass editing.

    @vincentcaudo-engelmann9057@vincentcaudo-engelmann90573 ай бұрын
  • I felt that the first three steps of Analytical reading is basically Pre-Reading. Otherwise, thank you for your video!

    @omaralshehhi2889@omaralshehhi28894 ай бұрын
  • I really like your content and I was motivated to buy game of thrones and I can't fully understand thr book because my first language is Arabic and my second language is English and I'm not that great

    @Rikaisdead@Rikaisdead3 ай бұрын
  • I'm running into issues with the superficial read in philosophy. I'm thinking I could do plato in audio book format then read it again using analytical techniques with a book taking notes. I jump straight into analytical and can barely get through a dialogue because I keep reading the same one over and over and finding new things.

    @skrrskrr505@skrrskrr5053 ай бұрын
  • Currently reading Adler's book. Only about 100 pages in but getting a lot out of it. However, the authors can be wordy 😳

    @JonStallings@JonStallings6 ай бұрын
  • I'm going with MA in Humanities based on the Great Books of the Western World from American Public University

    @davidwilson410@davidwilson4104 ай бұрын
    • :') i wish you well on your journey🎉

      @ichibannotakaramono0@ichibannotakaramono04 ай бұрын
  • Send more vidéos about Reading books

    @mohamedouaboub1025@mohamedouaboub10255 ай бұрын
  • Can you do a book tour??

    @Desi_Rae@Desi_Rae5 ай бұрын
  • Thank you. I am reading The Myth of Sisyphus for the first time, and I am not sure what Camu means when he says "nostalgia." I'm going to reread it when I'm done with this first read. I would be interested in a video on syntopical reading.

    @SevenUnwokenDreams@SevenUnwokenDreams6 ай бұрын
    • Good luck! I’ve read it a handful of times. Camus ‘The Stranger’ is thought to have been a companion book to MOS but supposedly they couldn’t print both because of war rationing of paper. I’ve read both books multiple times and I feel that Meaursalt is the embodiment of the “absurd man”, a man that is so transfixed with everyday passion and routine that he rebels and decides to live on his own terms.

      @buddahluvaz8@buddahluvaz86 ай бұрын
  • My process of how I retain what I read: 1. Have ADHD. 2. Buy a bunch of books in an area you’re really interested in. 3. Read a few chapters before you go to bed. 4. Hyper focus all night on what you just read getting no sleep. 5. Word vomit everything to your spouse, a friend, or random people on Reddit the next morning.

    @DanielHarris171@DanielHarris1715 ай бұрын
    • Also, Hitchens isn’t the best atheist read. He has a very colonial epistemology.

      @DanielHarris171@DanielHarris1715 ай бұрын
    • Oh, how this resonated with me. 😅 I’ve found the only way I can retain things with my ADHD is to take notes while reading. I annotate my books & take notes on my iPad/laptop. Otherwise I have no clue what I’ve read.

      @naeshelle@naeshelle5 ай бұрын
  • Even elementary reading can be extremely challenging when reading Latin or Greek classics…

    @mikkopiippo8137@mikkopiippo81376 ай бұрын
  • you look like Sean, in the movie entitled "goodwill hunting" 😂

    @antoninoamadohibanada8682@antoninoamadohibanada8682Ай бұрын
  • An aside: What mic do you use? Your sound seems so much better than most others

    @terileekline@terileekline6 ай бұрын
  • Here are the points summarizing the video: This video is about how to get the most out of reading difficult non-fiction books by applying Mortimer Adler's ideas. The video dives into four types of reading: elementary, inspectional, analytical, and synoptical reading. This video will mainly focus on analytical reading. Inspectional reading is a quick overview to get a sense of the book's content. Here are some tips for inspectional reading: Read the blurb on the back of the book. Look at the table of contents. If available, skim the index. Briefly read the introduction. Analytical reading is a deep dive into the text where you take notes and annotations. Here are the six steps of analytical reading according to Adler: Classify the book: Determine the genre of the book (e.g. non-fiction, literary criticism). X-ray the book: skim through the book to get an idea of the structure and organization of the book. Come to terms with the author: Define important terms the author uses throughout the book. Determine the author's message: Identify the main argument the author is making. Criticize the book fairly: Analyze the author's arguments and see if they hold up. Try to come up with counterarguments as well. Decide your own conclusion: Form your own opinion about the book and the ideas presented by the author. Synoptical reading is a more advanced technique where you compare multiple books on the same topic.

    @LFCYNWA-nv1zk@LFCYNWA-nv1zkАй бұрын
  • Im 24 years old, never really sat down and read a book before. I am currently trying to read No Longer Human by Osamu Dazai and I am having a hard time reading it. There are alot of words that I dont understand, and the sentences are structured so weird to me. On top of that I am focusing on reading out loud to improve my speaking and i continue to stammer over my words. Any suggestion on what i should do to help me be a better reader?

    @rodriguez3752@rodriguez37522 ай бұрын
    • No longer human is my favorite book and I also had hard time reading it. You just have to read it you'll get used to it as I did.

      @usamaplayz2623@usamaplayz2623Ай бұрын
  • This is a good one. I have had this book since 10 years and I am yet to read it. Somehow, I feel like I am able to manage, but after watching your video, I feel like instead of reading a dozen books, I would rather read a couple of really great books really well and multiple times. This would really transform what my grasp is on the books. Jared, thanks for this video. You have a calm way of presenting things that really resonated with me.

    @prithviraj1080@prithviraj10802 ай бұрын
  • Great video except I wear headphones when I watch videos and the clicking is very loud. Can you adjust these in future videos? Thanks!

    @ToddBryantsr@ToddBryantsr5 ай бұрын
  • Also, Leszek Kołakowski, looks ike an interesting guy, new to me, so thanks.

    @timbushell8640@timbushell86406 ай бұрын
  • I will highly recommend The Zahir by Paulo Coelho and btw your new look is awesome

    @AbhinavKanishk@AbhinavKanishk6 ай бұрын
  • I was hoping this would be on fiction. I don’t often have that reticence when approaching non-fiction books. But when approaching certain fictional books, there can be an intimidation. IE The Brothers Karamazov, Ulysses, The Tunnel, and so on.

    @markmorrison7785@markmorrison77855 ай бұрын
    • I’m planning a fiction video soon, given the popularity of the request!

      @_jared@_jared5 ай бұрын
    • A good approach for fiction or more difficult text like you've mentioned might be different to this. Reading slow would be key, stopping to reflect or maybe summarize what's happening is necessary. For Ulysses, it's actually beneficial to read out loud, Joyce designed the book to be read out loud like an an epic poem, same can be said about Shakespeare, reading out loud can be very beneficial for the more difficult stuff. As well as reading at a slow pace, thinking of it like you're trying to digest it piece by piece, it also okay to not completely understand the things that will go completely over you're head (Joyce intentionally did stuff like that).

      @gilbertoflores7397@gilbertoflores73974 ай бұрын
    • Thank you for your reply; all great advice! I have been practicing reading out loud. Even when out I do it under my breath but still audible to my ear and it’s surely helped. There is something gratifying about reading slow too. As if I am truly digesting the work instead of just rushing to add another number to the book count.

      @markmorrison7785@markmorrison77854 ай бұрын
KZhead