UKRAINIAN SURPRISE RAID STRIKES DEEP! Breaking Ukraine War News With The Enforcer (Day 802)
2024 ж. 4 Мам.
79 943 Рет қаралды
A Ukrainian surprise raid deep behind enemy lines has hit Russia incredibly hard, and shows occupation forces that no one is safe no matter where they are in Ukraine. Russian forces have been stopped near Avdiivka as Ukrainian forces dig into defensive positions near the area. Russian forces are tkaing incredibly high losses, and the need to feed Ukraine ammo is a major issue in europe. Finland is looking to open a TNT factory to fuel the demand.
Support The Enforcer On Patreon:
/ the_enforcer
Join The Enforcer's Twitter:
/ itstheenforcer
Support The War Effort In Ukraine:
u24.gov.ua/
Day 802 Ukraine War Map:
www.google.com/maps/d/edit?mi...
Viva LSA and Slava Ukraini!💙💛
Love the impressions guys, hilarious AF.
Slava, Ukraine, Slava, to the heroes of Ukraine? God bless you and yours much love from Texas!
LSA!!! Slava Ukraini!!! 🇺🇦
Idea: you should open up an email or social media page to accept stories from Ukrainian soldiers and the family members, neighbors, and friends of fallen soldiers, and choose one each day or week to highlight, honor, and tell his/her story. Just a thought. I think it’d show something I think many are missing about this conflict, and that is the humanity behind their bravery.
Always love ur work ❤
send nato in at all angles
I'm still following all of this day by day, although almost never comment. I still appreciate the enthusiasm and I get the necessary bias. But, as is picked up in some of the comments here, I do worry that your pro-Ukraine reporting at times tips into hyperbole, which can undermine its validity. You need to address the more recent Russia advances, notwithstanding their casualties. If they don't care how many people they lose, neither perhaps should military analysts: the Soviets lost a lot more people at Stalingrad than the Germans/Axis (maybe twice as many killed), but no one would claim they lost that battle. Also, all of the discussion about NATO sending troops is questionable given how different NATO countries have struggled to send ammunition and equipment. NATO countries' domestic populations are either disinterested in this conflict/war, or reluctant/unable to provide military aid that might prevent the need to send troops. The US public don't seem to appreciate how signing off billons for Ukraine benefits their own arms production market/military kit upgrades. Welfare-fixated western economies are unwilling to ramp up military spending. Post-WW2, emasculated Germans refuse to consider military action under any circumstances. NATO troops are only going to appear on Ukrainian battlefields in some sort of politically-misguided slip towards wider war - or if the Russians escalate (intentionally or not). Even if this happens, I cannot see USA joining in: the only world military supperpower has more recently left its allies in the lurch in the Middle East and took years of vacilliating/convincing to join both world wars. If US politicians try to stop Ukrainians bombing Russian oil refineries because they're worried about the price of oil, how many of these politicians are going to sanction the loss of American blood? That would be a lot harder to stomach than higher gas prices.
Is NATO thinking of sending troops to Ukraine as NATO, or are some NATO countries thinking bilaterally of entering the fight? There is a difference.
Exactly. This is a key distinction some people are not picking up on.
@@octaviantimisoreanu5810 If a country is entering bilaterally, it is not the same and rule 5 cannot be invoked subsequently to help its defense.
@@davidhowse884 Yep. and with respect to France, I believe the French president made it clear that they would not be entering the conflict as a NATO party and therefore, would not invoke article 5.
@@octaviantimisoreanu5810 No WW3 resulting.
Exactly. Finland, Poland, Sweden, France. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania could do it alone. NATO doesn't join in unless the z regime hits on NATO territory.
When saying sending troops to Ukraine(like if France did) would start ww3. I don't think so at all Russia will not drag in the entire Nato into the war. That would mean Turkey closes the water into Black Sea. And Denmark/Sweden closes the Baltic sea. And Norway closes the North Atlantic route. Russia would be extremely isolated they know this. There is a reason russia extremely rarely been at war with Denmark. Only Napoleonic war but that's after UK sunk the entire Danish fleet so they could blockade. But this part is apparently completely ignored by the Enforces.
But when looking down the barrel of an overwhelmingly devastating nuclear disaster (one with possible mutually assured destruction), does that really even weigh in the balance? If the world goes to war with Russia, for countless reasons including those you mentioned, Russia is left with really only one resort. We know, and they know it. It’s as much a deterrent for them as it is for us. If it spills out of Ukraine, we probably won’t have much choice, so let us hope that never happens.
Technically NATO troops being attacked is an article 5 level threat so should NATO troops as such be at the Ukrainian front, then at any one time they are deliberately attacked (or even by accident if we figure we want the war) then WW3 ia started, least so far as the paperwork and declarations. That doesnt implicitly say nukes and so on, but its most definately not a situation we want. Depending on alot of factors it could cause Russia to tuck its tail or go full nuclear deployment. Basically those are the options, theres no real middle road, as NATO conventional forces would obliterate Russian occupation in mere weeks. France does seem to atleast signal that they figure they can send an expeditionary force and somehow not be NATO far as fighting in Ukraine goes. Im guessing thats a political manouvere to force US hands to send aid before such a volatile escalation. But France has left NATO before and rejoined later, so that is a way they could actually do what they said.
@bonielsen8001 France has never left NATO. You are referring to when they withdrew from the military command structure of NATO in 1966, but they were still part of the alliance. At the time, they didn't want their forces to be under the command of foreign generals as I recall but my memory is starting to get fuzzy so I'll stop here while I'm still ahead 😅
LSA!!!
Free speech and disagreement are essential to the western beliefs you defend
Answering the question about the A10. A10's can only operate in a theatre with complete air dominance. In a contested air space, the A10 is vulnerable to air dominance aircraft and air defense systems.
Hehe, from what I’ve seen, Russia has neither. 😉
Awesome live stream and fundraiser👍
An expert is a drip under pressure
Yesterday there was mention of Oz cardboard drones. We deliver some 120 per month. You probably don't read about them because they are not the most prevalent drones in Ukraine. They are very effective in a certain role.
Old saying on the 'Expert'.... 'Ex' as in past tense ... 'Spurt'... a drip under pressure 😀
I feel that with the steady continous advances by ruzzia, it's not looking good for Ukraine at the moment. Hoping they can reverse these advances, but it would be very hard on manpower to do that.
Should not say that a train of Bradley’s enter Ukraine !
Why not I know Russia is dumb as but I think they probably dont rely on this channel for military intelligence, right?
I support NATO in Ukraine. Had NATO given Putin 1 week to remove his troops before kicking them out this would have been over when it started. This was a big mistake.
If NATO entered the war, they would NOT fight Russia’s fight. The war would obtain a whole different look.
100 French Foreign Legion soldiers have been deployed to Ukraine.
Damn today's speech got me in the feels.
Hello Enforcer and Hello Enforcer Matt Слава Україні! 🇺🇦🦖🇺🇦
You leave the enforce and enforce Matt alone your like bold children they do a great job just because they do it differently than anybody else
LSA!
David Attenborough making a comeback in the Enforcer channel. Suka blyat
🚜🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
Your voices are so similar
They are brothers so makes sense 👍🏻
🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
Sorry but that m113 driver was stupid. Maybe like drive like 20 meter or f-ing move my god that was stupid
Russia would be too scared to be completely destroyed outside of Ukraine. This wasn't their intent from the beginning and still isn't, though they are still trying to completely take over Ukraine. Should NATO get involved? No, NATO should not get involved. I believe that individual countries should get involved on a individual basis. It's a matter of principle of NATO(defensive), it's could be just a matter of the uniform they wear.
Russia should have thought about that before using nato territory as missile paths to hit targets in Ukraine.. its defense because we have been threatened with nuclear war several times Also russia used weapons of mass destruction that could have killed thousands on uk soil so fk russia
To be fair, logically if any NATO member country decides to get involved in war, then they shouldn't count on NATO to defend them when Russia retaliates. NATO is defensive pact
Stop yelling ffs. You are not a child anymore…
🦘🦘🦘
Folks claiming to be experts typically haven’t started shaving yet.
waycan"twe,all callthis ar wwII.5.0
While I ardently support Ukraine same as most of us here, we have to draw a line. I do not support direct NATO involvement, because that will lead to ww3. Even at the height of the Cold War, there has never been direct open conflict between nuclear powers and this precedent is something humanity ought to respect. NATO countries should give the Ukrainians everything they need, except when it comes to lives. I believe that with the right amount of military capabilities and support from the West, Ukrainians can defend themselves on their own. But the reality is, that what 70% of people are asking for will lead to our destruction, and people need to reevaluate where they stand. Once Ukraine becomes a NATO member, then we can come back to the question of all out war with another nuclear power.
LSA! LSA! LSA!
European Russia need to
I'm fairly new on this channel.. why the 13min intro every time, we need to skip?
The introduction music is beautiful, we LSA love it. Plus the LSA anthem is to unified the stream.
Long intros are actually pretty common with streams these days
It's to allow some time to get more people onto the stream before they start talking about updates. 👍🏻
those are the live broadcasts - if you don't want to hear the intro music/video etc then just skip to the start (straight after LSA flag)
My god...your analysis is high school level. Sick with reporting, drop the uneducated analysis.
Yeah, this enforcer fellow was bragging that he predicted that the future of the tanks would use reactive armor, and then read an article that we’re sending military vehicles with reactive armor to Ukraine. The only problem is active protection system technology has been in development for years a simple google Would’ve pointed out this fact.
It’s like two little boys making things up.
Of you don’t Like it ,just don’t stay. Bye bye
@@Taubeman this is the endumbening of America. someone has got to say something.
You leave the enforce and enforce Matt alone you fools your life bold children
You guys are completely delusional. What a shame, because you’re very good at what you do. Embrace for a harsh reality check when this was is over. Good luck.
Completely delusional with respect to what? Please clarify.
You sound very jealous! Do what you do! And let us enjoy The Enforcer
@@TaubemanExactly!!🇸🇪👍🏻LSA
Insults diluted with compliments, a very deceptive and trained response tactic. Tell me, how long have you been doing this, and is putin still sending in your paychecks, or are you getting shafted like those actually fighting on the front line too? Don’t worry, you’ll get your chance to see what it’s like… 😂
slava ukraini! 🦾 LSA 🦾
Wasn't able to watch video because of long intro, every time I try to skip the intro I end up starting at around the 20mins mark, so not sure when it actually started? Oh well can't be bothered messing about, plenty of other channels with same news but no stupid long intro, Unsubscribed
There's ten minutes of intro, always. Unsubscribing doesn't count for much if you only subscribed so you could do it.
@GWNorth-db8vn I have unsubscribed because can't skip the intro to where it begins on my phone with my big sausage fingers
@@Rcknives - Why did you subscribe in the first place, then? "I'm unsubscribing" is one of the most popular lines the trolls all use.
Exelente.gracias por la informacion
I come here for the emotional support Marmot 🦫🥰… but wot is the fly’s 🪰 role 😹