Nikon Z6II After Using It For 1 Year / Full Review
After using Nikon Z6II for the entire year, I'm in position to deliver detailed conclusion (good, bad, and what can be improved). This video is a combination of many questions that I have been asked throughout the year by the viewers of my channel.
Go down to video chapters for various aspects of the camera. I would love your feedback. Your subscription to the channel would be much appreciated.
www.TouchLifeStudio.com
VIDEO CHAPTERS
00:00 - Intro
01:58 - Image Quality
02:20 - Image Processor
02:41 - Color Rendition
03:36 - JPGs
04:11 - Card Slots
05:58 - USB-C Port to Charge the Camera
06:25 - On and Off Switch
07:37 - Touch Screen
09:10 - i-Menu (Quick Menu)
10:06 - FTZ Adapter
12:22 - Video Capabilities
13:14 - Picture Profile for Video
14:01 - ISO
15:16 - Z-Mount Lenses
16:49 - EVF (Electronic View Finder)
18:21 - Eye and Face Auto Focus
19:45 - IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization)
20:25 - Auto White Balance
21:25 - Wireless Firmware Updates (via Snap Bridge)
22:01 - Ergonomics
23:22 - Battery Life
24:35 - Pocket Wizard Triggers
25:30 - D-Pad
26:04 - Sensor Is Not Protected
26:55 - Time Limit
28:14 - Final Conclusion
Did I miss any important features of the Nikon Z6II that you can share?
Not exactly... but you said you didn't have any blackout with the optical viewfinder... ummmm... you do, every time the mirror lifts to allow the light to hit the sensor?!? This is why I am not sure why people get so frustrated about the blackout you experience with a digital camera?!
@@PaulCornish if you hold the AF-ON button is continuous mode, not much blackout issue. Hope this helps.
@@TouchLifeStudio I don't have an issue with it... I was addressing the fact you stated in your video that there was no blackout in using your D500 which has a mechanical shutter and a mirror so DEFINITELY has blackout. I have been using the Z6ii for quite a while, shot a number of weddings with it and don't have a problem with the blackout... mostly I am not shooting things that need a fast shutter run anyway.
have any problem to shoot video with third party lens using adobter?
@@sumantamehara3352 I only used Sigma 18-35 mm f mount. While there was slight noise of the motor during focusing, it still worked great and sharp.
I would suggest 24-120. I know its f/4 and not f/2.8 but the quality of images coming out of it is amazing
One of the most useful reviews on the z6ii I have seen and I am ordering one. Thank you for making this.
Glad I was able to help. It is a fantastic camera.
I liked this update, It was easy to follow and clear. Thank You.
Great review. Thank you. It's very thorough.
Loved the review, and I love Nikon and the Z6ii as well. Just subscribed.
Thanks Fel. There are more videos in the pipe line...
Excellent 1 year review of your Z6II camera. Thanks for sharing your experience... 👍👍👍✌
My pleasure
Thank you for the excellent detailed review after using the camera for one year. I love the images and color straight from camera that Nikon produces. Considering the z6 ii for weddings but was concerned about the auto focus but looks like it’s not a deal breaker.
James, this is a great camera for events/ wedding. Coupled with Z lenses makes this camera even more usable.
Good to know on the pocket wizard Thanks
One of the best Z6 ii reviews 👍
Thanks Win Fc
Thank you for taking the time to make this long term review. You've covered most of my concerns in great detail. I'm seriously considering the Z6II OR z7II for mainly portrait and event photography. I used to shoot full frame with the D700. Since then I've started doing hybrid shooting with the GH4 and GH5. Those cameras are great for video, but the autofocus for event work leaves much to be desired. So I'm exploring going back to Nikon. I like that the Z cameras have a top screen, that is a feature that is super important to me when you need to be in the moment and not fiddling with a back screen or peering through an evf.
If you are coming from GH5, you won’t be disappointed. For portraiture to video AF is fantastic.
I too have been using GH5 for many years now and would like to switch to the Z6II, did you buy it? If yes, how did you find yourself?
Estou querendo fazer vídeos de festa infantil, sem perder o propósito que é a fotografia. Acredita que ela é boa pra isso? Na Sony existe o s-log, na z6ii tem alguma função similar?
Thanks for great review! I added the grip to my Z6ii and it's amazing how good it fits my hand, they really got the ergo right on the Z bodies. With the FTZ I can use the F mount lenses and get better results than I did on the DSLRs, could be due to IBIS and autofocus improvements with latest 1.4 firmware.
I’m glad you hear you like your Z6II. I feel like using f-mount lenses on Z bodies made those lenses even better.
Great review!! This camera sounds amazing
Yep, thx.
Great video Vitalij. Great work. We will be in touch. Rock n Roll!!!
Thx Vahag. Learning from great guys like you!!!
Nice information you give me I watch your whole video I like it the way of your explanation
Thanks for watching. Hope it helped.
Thanks for the review. I will be upgrading to the Z6II after I sell my Z50.
You will enjoy your Z6II. It is a great camera with awesome image quality.
Great review, thank you so much. I am on the way to get a second body to my D800E and with that I will use video of course. Thanks to your and other Informations on the net, I think the better way is to go to the Z6II version directly. The Z6II is generally better for video as its bigger sister, because of no line skipping. The Image quality your (only) 24 MP offer, ist extraordinary and proves, that for a lot of purposes you do not need 45 MP. Greetings from DUS, Dusseldorf, Germany
Thanks for this video! Anyway what camera did you shot this video with?
i love your review. Thanks for mentioning about the time limit on video recording. I was wondering about that for some time now. I have nikon D90 (yes my cam is 13 years old now), so30 mins is a big jump but not Canon camera level.
30 min record limit is enough for most people, but someone who needs extended limits, other camera brands offer that but also Nikon higher end camera such as Z9 offers that as well.
@@TouchLifeStudio thanks for the info. I’d be happy with the 30min recording in my amateur hobby.
Its great to see a review by someone who has used the Z6ii for a year. I just bought one, so I am very keen to watch your video and make notes What brand is that red hand strap you have?
Glad I could help. The strap is called - Spider Light Hand Strap.
unfortunately in canon-red 🙂THX for the review@@TouchLifeStudio
This is a very thorough and excellent overview.👍 Second, I've never understood why KZheadrs nitpick and complain about the Nikon Z6II, which has become a great camera after a major update. Unfortunately, many Nikon users aren't happy with what they already have, which are excellent cameras like the Nikon Z6II and Z7II, because they're too busy guessing what the next camera will be like instead of enjoying what they already have.
Yep!
Thnx, great recap but .... no word about the different autofocus settings.
I own the 24-70 2.8s and 70-200 2.8s but I also used to own the old F mount equivalent (the 24-70 no VR and 70-200 FL). I think it's a huge upgrade in image quality especially for the 24-70 2.8s, this zoom lens is almost comparable to a prime lens imo.
In the UK, there's this separate from Nikon legal entity called Nikon School and one of their trainers, Ricci Chera, frequently does comparison tests, e.g. between old and new, or between prime and zoom. The new f/2.8S zooms are on another level and almost as good as the primes. Ricci's tests confirm that. I never shot Nikon zooms, shoot Nikon since 1975 (F2) and pro-grade primes like the 1.4G F-mount series. The Z f/1.8S primes are seriously better than the gold ring G lenses. The new lenses are optically more complex so as to handle chromatic aberration better, deal with the tunnel-effect of filter layers over the sensor, be sharper, have less focus breathing (a prime with no focus breathing is actually a zoom lens, optically). My ongoing rant about F chromatic aberration is completely silenced and tint differences between lenses have become negligible. The old lenses are very good and absolutely suitable for pro/commercial use - but the Z system is a lot better, optically. That does not give you better photos, artistically, though. For people starting in photography, a Nikon Z body with FTZ (ii) adapter and 2nd hand F lenses would be an excellent start.
@@jpdj2715 sensible advice. Not everyone needs the top equipment at top prices! Especially the old G and F lenses used are priced so attractively!
Thank you!
I agree with this video. 2 points... 1) when using an SD card, the system should not lag if you are using the correct card. IE: 250mb per sec or above card. This is also noted in the Nikon manual. Will it use slower cards, yes, but if you use the recommended card, then there is no bottleneck, although I do love the CF Express cards. 2) Focus noise in video from F mount lenses. If you use a plug in remote mic like a lav, then that noise is muted. But I agree with noise otherwise. For best voice recording, I use a lav on all my clients. 24-70 F/2.8s and 70-200 F/2.8s are lovely and I would highly recommend to anyone buying into Nikon. Thanks for this nice video.
Thanks for the kind works and great feedback.
Thanks for a great review on Nikon Z6ii which in 2024 there are lots of sales. Just wondering how the next Z6iii coming this year will compare. It will likely have many of the Zf features and specs and a vari-angle lens. So it comes down to budget and price, and whether a tilt screen appeals more than a vari-angle screen based on use. No doubt a newer camera will have better specs, but the Z6ii is still a good camera and prices may look favorable to someone on a budget when the new camera appears this year. Thanks for your review!
My pleasure! I have no doubt, Z6III will be a great camera.
the on-off switch was in the same place on Nikon D90, Nikon 60 and 35, so that's not new, but really handy
It's been there on all their cameras since the 90's and the film days. I really don't know why other manufacturers even bothered to put it anywhere else.
Great stuff
Thx NikCan
I'm about to take a leap of faith and buy this camera. Coming from Sony. Great review!
Good choice!
Very informative - thank you. I happen to use a d500 as well. I want to upgrade to the z6ii but I’m on the fence. Any advice? A little push either way? - Thank you.
While the D500 is a great camera Z6II is better in most areas, except for ergonomics (but that is subjective). If you are looking to get your images and especially video to a different level, Z6II will do it. Best of luck!
@@TouchLifeStudio Thank you for your prompt reply. I appreciate the input.
4:50 Thanks for pointing out the benefits of having both XQD and SD Card slots. I think the people dissing it haven't used it for more than 2 weeks! That is if they even have it physically
XQD/ CF express cards will be as fast in the future as SSD drives. Tech is going that way…I think.
New firmware (fw) got just released (3.40) for Mk i - changes the experience for the better. Looking forward to new fw for the Z 7ii. High expectations: improved subject recognition and tracking, less eVF blackout and higher speeds as firmware can still benefit much more from the two parallel processors with their separate (?) I/O channels and much doubled processor cache.
Is that what’s coming for the z6II and 7II?
@@TouchLifeStudio - if we see what improved firmware does for the Z6/7 now at 3.4 and having seen what new firmware does in the Z 9, we can justifiably expect this. The Expeed 7 behaves like two processors in one chip and has separate I/O lanes where a single Expeed 6 has one shared. As the Z 6ii/7ii have two Expeed 6, Nikon needed to rewrite their firmware to benefit from two parallel "computers". If you look at computer games, you'll see old game engines do not benefit from more cores but only from more clock speed. Then there was a generation that benefited a bit but had synchronization issues between parallel execution paths and current games can benefit better. As in games, like in photography, bandwidth is very important for I/O throughput, you also see that e.g. Intel went single thread per core (threads share the I/O paths of a core). Well, with two Expeed 6 processors, I presume the motherboard was optimized for throughput in parallel paths and also presume that the first firmware marginally benefited from that. If you compare the Z 7 at fw 1 with Z 7 at 3.4 and know that the Z 7ii is at fw 1.3 or 1.4 then expect a lot. I'd say a Z 7ii should easily be able to compete with a D850 at all levels and if we expect a Z 8 then that one should have way more photosites (MP), not the same or incrementally more as the Z 7ii.
@@jpdj2715 , I would love to see those improvements to the Z6&7IIs. That would be a strip down version of Z9, although probably a stretch.
I own both lenses: the Nikon Z 24-70 mm f/2.8 and the Nikon Z 70-200 mm f/2.8. Both lenses are amazing.
I'm leaning towards 24-70. Thanks.
@@TouchLifeStudio This is my favorite one thanks to its versatility, its lightness, its size and the 2.8 aperture. The Nikon Z 24-70 mm f/2.8 is by far the lens which I use the most.
I've been really happy with using my 70-200mm EX lens from my SLR system. It's pin sharp and faultless and dont feel the need to buy the Z version it's so good.
I know it’s great. It looks like the Z system cameras made the SLR lenses perform better. I love that. You are not the first person to indicate that.
I use to have D500 and loved it, I've used it pretty much for videography, I have switched to mirrorless no more DSLRs, I've also traded my D810 which was a beast, I own the original Z6 and Z6ii, I don't see much difference in between, both are fantastic Cameras, I have to trade my F 24 70mm F2.8 to the S lens 24 70mm f2.8 which costs nearly 2200$, both lenses have sharped image quality, but the mirrorless S lenses are lighter and smaller plus the autofocus quiet.
Very informative…. Tnxs….what strap do u use? What lens that is mounted on that camera in the video?
thank you. Strap - spider holster light and lens - 50mm f1.8 z lens.
I got the Z6 II in October 2021 and I’ve been having a BLAST with it. Started off with 35mm f/1.8S, 24-70 f/4S, and 85mm f/1.8S. There’s a sale going on right now and both 2.8S lenses you’re looking at as they are $300 off EACH in the US. Don’t hesitate, order/pick them up. I have the 24-70 and the 70-200 gets to me before the end of November. You’ll thank yourself for getting the longer zoom for the ceremony at weddings, trust me.
Great. Thanks for the insight. 70-200 is defiantly what’s needed at ceremonies. I need to start slowly selling off my f-mount lenses to offset the cost.
@@TouchLifeStudioIf the sale is available in your country, it’s available through Nikon and any authorized dealers. I traded in my f/4S to get the 2.8S. And the sale expires 11/30/2021, so you may need to act now.
@@RemyOrtiz thanks for the heads up. Much appreciated.
SmallRig makes great L brackets for the Zs with a cutout for the FTZ adapters .
Great. Thx. I will check it out. Much appreciated.
Thanks! Is it true that autofocus turns off if you twist or even touch the focusing ring on nikkor 24-70 f4?
I have a Z6II that I recently acquired as well as a Z 24-200. I upgraded from a D780. The camera is amazing and the lens is a great walk around addition. I purchased the Z 70-200 2.8. It's large and a bit heavy but the image quality is amazing. I have the 2X TC that I use with that lens. I still get really good image quality even when blown up 100%. I have an F 200-500 5.6 that seems to get better image quality then it did with the D780.
Hm netter Image quality with the Z6ii against the D780? Well - this is kinda weird because it's basically the same sensor (as in the Z6 too). 😅 With the D750 I would agree (this sensor is also used in the Z5 btw.) but the D780 came after the Z6 and is internally - except of the finder - the same camera. If you go to live-mode you have the same tracking-fearures and so on and as I said: sensors should be the same.
Thanks for the great review of your experience. Invest in the f2.8 vs the f4. I chose to purchase the Z 24/70 f2.8S when I bought my Z6ii early this summer. It is simply stunning. I don't make a living with photography and therefore NOT a pro; For me, with today's tech, cameras are like phones, ie, they're all amazing. With the Z6ii, I've learned to use subject tracking and autofocus in various situations but know I can always revert to single point or dynamic AF which is my comfort zone from DSLR's when I shot on-field sports for a University (I used the D500 with a 70-200 f2.8 and 300 prime f-mounts for those). My Z 24-70 f2.8s is probably the better decision b/t lens and body if I had to choose and I can't imagine being without it. I recently shot a 5K event for YMCA and it offered so much flexibility with tack, tack, tack sharp results!! If they weren't sharp, it was the photographer behind the camera. Invest in the 2.8 version...you're a pro and I think you'll regret not getting the 2.8. Good luck.
Thanks for sharing your experience. I’m glad your are happy with the Z6II. Yes, I did ended up getting the 24-70 2.8 and it is a stunning lens. I made a review of that lens after using using on my channel. I use it for weddings and every day shoots.
For my next Z prime, what do you recommend for family portraits, inside/outside light, < 70mm. Tx.
@@MichaelEwing I use 50 1.8 S lens for lots of my events and group shots. Great price, great for low light, relatively small. Anything wider, maybe 35 mm 1.8 be ok, just not as pleasing, imo.
Just seeing this now. Great overview. Perhaps you can help me? I am debating right now between getting a D500 or the Z6ii. I do wide range of photography types but focus on wildlife also into video with KZhead channel too. I use an older Nikon DSLR for photos and wanted to update. I know the D500 is great for wildlife photography but not so great for autofocus type video work. Hence who I consider the Z6ii. Or do you think a different mirrorless would be better? Any suggestions welcomed. Thanks!
Thanks for feedback. The d500 is a fantastic camera and defiantly for photo when it comes to subject aquisition. Video is OK on d500 but no the AF. Z6II would be the great/ fantastic for Video and great for portraiture. I see many use it also for wildlife but it depends on wildlife type (fast vs slow objects). Z6II has also newer tech and will benefit you more. I sold my D500 (I loved that camera, but it was time to move on).
@@TouchLifeStudio thanks very much for your response. Having always used DSLRs, so I feel familiar with them but also see how mirrorless have other advantages. And now that I’m into video the Z6ii would be nice in that regard.
@@hervedelnorte7928 best of shooting…
very informative sir. Subscribed. I'm planning to get this camera. But sometimes become confuse. Only one thing is my headache about this camera and that's autofocus. Somebody says it can beat a7iii in some part. When R6 was released it had also autofocus problem but what we are seeing about R6 now its after firmware update. May be in near future we will get newer update for z6ii. I watched a video that was released 7/8 months ago, there I saw z6ii & R6 autofocus are same. Funny thing is that z6ii was slightly better in some parts hahahahah. I don't know sir my points are relevant or not. I'm just a ordinary guy and newly graduate from film & media from Bangladesh who is looking for a hybrid camera and little bit confused.
The Z6II recently received new firmware updates. Most of the full frame cameras on the market (Nikon, Sony or Canon) are great tools for hybrid work. Canon and Sony tend to be more expensive with native lenses. I have experience shooting with R5 that has great AF, but it is not to say that Z6II is any worse. It is just different.
@@TouchLifeStudio Oh thank u sir.
If you want to extend the grip, and don't want the vertical batter grip, get the Meike MK-Z7G grip extension - fits the Z6 and Z7 versions 1 and 2 (probably the Z5 as well but I don't know) and it just extends the grip enough to make the grip feel more like a D750 grip where your whole hand fits perfectly on the grip. It does not add much weight or size to the camera and is very inexpensive - I think its around $30. - Highly recommended if you want your Z6/7 to feel more like your old D750/850.
I’ve tried to find one. It’s been out of stock everywhere. 🙁
@@TouchLifeStudio Interesting - I guess these have gotten popular - I have 2. The good news is that there are a lot of Z6/7 users if these things are back ordered everywhere. Put in an order - you'll love it when you get it.
I would go for 70-200. Especially after you mentioned that you liked a lot your sigma 18-35.
The Canon R5/6 uses the mechanical shutter mechanism to shield the sensor when you change lenses and this is actually a TERRIBLE idea! The last thing you want to do is to get sand and grit into your mechanical shutter mechanism - this is likely to destroy the shutter which is a $600 repair minimum. Most informed pros actually turn off this feature on the Canon R5/6. It is really good that Nikon did not include this on the Z6/7 - it is much easier (and much cheaper) to clean a sensor than to replace a shutter mechanism. You can buy 12 swabs for like $30 and do it yourself very easily - costs is about $1 or $2 per cleaning - so you can literally clean your sensor 300-600 times for the cost of one shutter mech repair, and you also won't lose your camera for several weeks while the repair is done. On the other hand, the Z9 has a sensor shield - this is NOT the actual shutter used for photography - in fact the Z9 does NOT have a mechanical shutter at all - utilizing only its ultra-fast electronic shutter. The shutter shield that it has is strictly there to block dust or stay particles of sand etc. It is built much more robustly than an actual photographic shutter and it is not subject to breaking simply because a particle of sand gets on it as a normal mechanical shutter is. Nikon engineers made the correct choice to NOT use the mechanical shutter for this type of use and to instead introduce a dedicated shutter shield for this job.
Wow - thx Baron for the insightful info. I certainly agree that shutter mech is a critical component of the camera and is design and timed with high accuracy. If it gets damaged by sand, oops. I love the idea of the sensor shield that Z9 introduced. Which does not need to be such a sensitive part of camera as shutter. It is likely more robust in Z9. Thanks for the info.
Isn't it funny how marketing departments can "sell" something that's actually a bad feature and unless you know, you wouldn't know and think it's great...
That is contrary to what some "influencers" on the Tube claim as an advantage for Canon. Its interesting to see the alternative argument. But beyond this, whats the future for Nikon as a mirrorless system ? I have been quite intrigued because I know that Z6II (and also the Lumix S5) is a great product overall but somehow find that Sony and Canon mirrorless systems are a bit more aligned to the future in terms of popularity and focus of their parent organization. BTW I am looking to upgrading from a decade old Nikon DSLR.
@@theacechip I've shot Sony mirrorless and Canon DSLR's. The IQ from the Nikon's is better in my opinion. That's always going to win for me over any other latest and greatest bells and whistles that are mostly spin anyway. Having said that, Nikon needs some lightweight pro cameras and soon or they will lose everything. The D850 and D500 shooters need a place to go, and so far they aint got one. I prefer the Z6ii/7II over any other companies cameras, but not over a Nikon Z8/Z80.
Thank you for the review.. it has been a couple years. But it is great! I am a Weeding/Family Photographer (and do some videos as well), I started with D750 and bought a Sony a7iii 3 years ago. I want to either go to the a7iv or Nikon Mirrorless. I have several F mount lenses. Could you please help me? Thank you!🙏
I like Nikon mirror less cameras. I’m enjoying also Zf, which has a retro style but with many more technological advancements over the Z6II. Zf has the same sensor as Z6II which is great for low light but Zf does not have the same ergonomics as Z6II. Consider z8 if that’s in the budget.
Thank you for this video! Did you ever purchase the Z lenses? What do you think of them? Debating on whether or not to purchase F mount lenses or upgrade to the newer Z lenses.
Yes, I fully switched to the Z lenses. Fantastic image quality. F-mount lenses work great. I suggest if you are using some lenses say 20% of time , ok to go with F-mount lenses. However, if you are using some lenses for 80% of time, I suggest go z-lenses. Better long term decision. Hope this helps.
@@TouchLifeStudio yes, absolutely! That's some sound advice! :)
Regarding the sensor protection against dust. Does the camera has any self cleaning or dust repellent mechanism? For example Olympus cameras they have the sensor exposed all the time just like the z6 II. But the Olympus camera has a layer in front of the sensor the will vibrate when the camera is turned on in order to shake any dust on the sensor
Nikon does not have it in this model. I had others Nikon DSLRs in the past and it would "clean" the sensor when shutting off the camera. Although, I'm not sure how effective that was.
@@TouchLifeStudio you can turn on a setting to clean the sensor when you shut off the camera on the z6ii as well :)
@@3akoscielski I haven’t noticed that feature. Thanks for let us know. Excellent.
The 18 - 35 Sigma is a DX lens is there a focal length at full frame where you dont get any vignetting.
Camera crops automatically on DX lenses, so no vignetting. This is a great lens for video work, but if you use it for photo you will loose on megapixels.
I've dumped my Sony gear to go back to Nikon. No matter how much I tried I just could not enjoy the colors coming out of the Sony when compared to what I get out of the Nikon.
I know, nobody questions Nikon colors. It’s awesome out of the box.
Well with the ETZ 21 Adapter you get the best of both worlds, for example the 35-150 f2-2.8 from Sony with the Z6II
I did exactly the same , colours and more important for me the ergonomics so much better on the Nikon 👍👍
@@Hugohackenbush i actually agree with this. They def do if you use standard pic mode. Try changing it to portrait mode and that should have it lean more towards pink.
@@Hugohackenbush fair enough. Canon does have beautiful skin tones for portraits. I always loved how they look. Unfortunately I'm not a fan of the canon ergonomics plus the native lenses are too expensive and they have a closed mount system so no 3rd party support. I have actually since moved on from the Z6 to the Z8 and it is light years ahead in AF compared to Z6. Ergonomics are also much better with add'l buttons over the Z6.
okay so I'm really interested in buying this camera moving from a Sony a series aps-c camera. I mostly just do architectural photography and landscape photography, do you think this camera really does fit in for me? what lenses do you recommend to get them with?
Z6II or Z7II if you need 45 mpx sensor. As far as lens, definatly a wide angle lens such as 14-24 mm or 24-70 mm.
@@TouchLifeStudio I think 25 megapixels is good enough for me. But I heard that the focusing on the z72 is a little bit more accurate. Seen a lot of good reviews for the 14-24. Thanks again for the info.
Good vedio . have nikon z5 do u think better if I buy z6 mark 2 I can trade it but if no big difference I just have z5 I use only for photos? Thanks
Zeki, I think if you use camera just for photos, Z5 is a great camera. It’s a full frame with many same features that you find in Z6II. If you are interested in doing video as well, Z6II or even Z6 will work great.
I have both the Nikon Z mount 24-70mm 2.8 S and the Nikon Z mount 70-200mm 2.8 S lenses, with the Z6II. I love both lenses and I don't have any reget of purchases them. The 70-200mm 2.8 is more verstile for portraits, weddings, sports and let just say I been using it a lot lately. The Z mount 24-70mm 2.8 S is more veratile for portraits, weddings, events and actually video. As I said no regets.
Thanks for sharing. Once you get this duo of lenses it covers most photography genres.
Hi! How is it possible to use the Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC crop lens on a fullframe camera?? You can not do that without experience vignetting on your image right!?
Once you mount a DX lens onto a full frame camera body, camera switches to DX mode automatically.
PS skip the battery grip if it's just for battery life only. You can externally power it through USB-C with a battery bank in my back pocket (right angle cable)
It would be mainly for ergonomics. During run and gun situations USB-C cable would be a nuisance I’m afraid.
If you want to stop blackouts when shooting sport just put your camera on 12 bit raw ( unless you work for apple or adobe) you don’t need those extra 14 bit info… when you print unless you print huge photos.. again you don’t need 14 bit raw… then place a read write cfexpress 1000+ / mbS and take out the other card .. you have unlimited buffer and no blackout ! It’s a mini z9 😃
Awesome, plus when you hold the back button focus it will eliminate the black out. In af-c.
Thanks for sharing this info, a great nugget to know!
I have previously owned 24-70/2.8 lenses from Canon and Sony and never loved the experience because the focal length range is so narrow relative to the size and weight of the lens. I much prefer to have either a 35mm or 50mm prime lens instead. In my mind, the more attractive option for a general purpose zoom lens on a full frame sensor is Nikon’s Z 24-120/4 S, which is deadly sharp straight from f/4 throughout the zoom range AND capable of nice quantity and quality of bokeh for portraits at the long end-moreso in terms of quantity than the Z 24-70/2.8 S wide open at 70mm. As for the 70-200/2.8, generally I don’t care for the bulk and weight. Over the last decade, I’ve instead relied successfully on 70-200/4 zooms, which are superior for the fact that I’m far more likely to have brought that lens along. With modern sensors able to scale the ISO range so effortlessly with such brilliant image quality, I don’t regret moving to the more compact, lighter zoom at all.
The f/4 Nikon Z lenses are great. And yes I agree the 24-70 f2.8 lens is hefty. There is market for for those who are looking for light and portable lenses and those lenses that need to be used for low light and on the go without changing lenses. I have used the 24-70 for about 5 months now and this lens has been performing.
The mirrorless cameras are easier to clean the sensor w/out a mirror. After removing the lens it is right there.
What did you film the video with?
I have the 24-70 (not mirrorless) and use it 85% of a wedding day… if the 70-200 wasn’t so heavy, I’d love one!
Hi Abby, I just got the 24-70 mm z lens and it is fantastic. 70-200 has outstanding rendering at 200 mm 2.8 focal length for portraits.
If the 70-200 f2.8 feels heavy you aren't using it often enough.
Could you tell me why my screen is very dark when I shoot in the studio. There must be a setting to make it brighter. It's usually when I'm shooting moody lighting. Thanks.
Under setup menus, check on monitor brightness and/or control panel brightness. Hope this helps.
I have both the f4 and 2.8 Z lenses and both great but for professional work i would go with the 2.8 just that much sharper.
Thx. The f/2.8 is on my radar…
I have it and it's a great camera, superb IQ. I'm waiting for the newly announced Z 24-120 F4, looks like it can do everything without spending more than 2000
I know, Z 24-120 looks like a winner!
Video time limit is Import/Export cameraTax/Tariff issue.
Can you use DX lenses incl Sigma lenses with this camera and FTZ adapters
Absolutely. Your DX lenses will perform better on the Z camera. Tested, done that. Works.
@@TouchLifeStudio Thanks a lot. A lot of my reservations have been removed.
Auto WB - as long as you do not shoot JPEG, changing WB settings has zero impact on your raw files. The WB number is just metadata. It only informs e.g. LrC how to open your file in base color corrections. If you live in the London-Berlin latitude range, then you might as well have the camera at "Cloudy" all the time. The effect is that sunset looks like sunset and hot summer day has the hot summer day colors. Shooting JPEG (only or next to raw) changes this, though. Here the camera does raw processing for you and needs the proper WB. Still, I would not use Auto-WB when I shoot JPEG too.
Yep, WB for raw don’t matter, just for JPG. Good point, I should have elaborated on that.
@@TouchLifeStudio - it's all fine. Keeping my camera at cloudy reduces latency between pressing the shutter and the shot (a bit) and may save a bit of battery. However there is so much image analysis going on in the camera already, that it might be marginal because of that. If we choose not to shoot JPEG next to raw we might think that the camera does no raw processing anymore, but then, how does it get to what we see in the viewfinder? Oh, I shoot a ColorChecker Passport occasionally, derive a profile from that and apply that to the series of a shoot. Gives an excellent starting point to artistically work/deviate from. But that ruins e.g. sunset mood, so it's not plain simple. And, the Nikon files from the Z 7ii are really great. If you spot some color or luminance noise in LrC, run the raw file through NX Studio.
I shoot RAW and am continually on AWB and Auto ISO - Nikon makes these work so well.
@@markshirley01 RAW files are awesome, easy to work with and great out of camera WB.
I've always used Canon, Sony or Fujifilm and was a so-called Nikon-snob. But I kept searching more and more about this camera and ordered it. This review gives me more confidence that I've not made the wrong choice. Thanks!
There is a lot to like about this camera for the price point and it’s features. Yes, it is not a Z9, or A1, nor R3. But the Z6II cost 1/3 of all those cameras and provides outstanding image quality along with its features. Enjoy your Z6II.
@@TouchLifeStudio Thanks a lot :)
wow
Isn’t the 30 minute video limit an import tax issue? I think it’s something to do with the distinction between dedicated video cameras versus photography DSLR/Mirrorless cameras and different taxes applied to each. I’m not sure how onerous the tax on video cameras but it seems like camera companies are loathe to pay it. Maybe a little lobbying by the big 3 is in order.
I’m hearing various reports: EU tax law vs. hardware issues. I believe we are past that, it’s 2022. Z9 and A1 don’t have those limitations. Will see how lower caliber cameras will be outfitted.
Now im using nikon z5 for wedding and also potrait.. What you can say if i upgrade to z6ii? Its worth?
Good question. If the Z5 works well for you to shoot weddings and your are happy with AF than no. But if you are looking for improvements on AF than yes, Z6II is great for indoor and outdoor wedding photography. It may have some AF issues in super low light situations but overall it is great.
First of all, thanks for your video. I actually think Z6II and the Z7II are not mature yet, for professional.. I usually use a Nikon D780 (a beautiful hybrid DSLR), I've tried a Nikon Z6II and I have to say I didn't feel sure with it, at all. I don't think they are affordable as they should be.. Furthermore, I think if you want to have a serious and perfectly professional camera, nowadays into the new Nikon Mirrorless System, you're forced to buy a Z8 or a Z9, that are very, very expensive. Anyway, that's just my thougth, obviously. My best regards, Domenico
I hear your point. Every technology advancement has its growth points and while Z6II is not considered a pro camera, like z8 and z9, it still can and does produce professional results.
Estou querendo fazer vídeos de festa infantil, sem perder o propósito que é a fotografia. Acredita que ela é boa pra isso? Na Sony existe o s-log, na z6ii tem alguma função similar?
After extensive research, I'm really torn between two options: (1) Sony A7iii, or (2) Nikon Z6ii. I plan to predominatly use the camera for casual & travel photography (e.g., landscape, wildlife, and the occasional portrait). With that said, I want to dabble in video and see what either camera can do. From what I've seen online, the Sony tends to be more popular overall, but the Nikon seems to have the same video capabilities and a faithful following with users bragging about Nikon's color in comparison to Sony. The durability of these cameras is also really important to me. I travel frequently and want to be able to take the camera with me wherever I go. From what I can tell, the Sony looks prettier but the Nikon appears to have a rougher/grippier "weather proof" coating... I'm aware the glass I choose to go with on either camera will have a huge effect on my picture quality/clarity. I am aware that Nikon is more limited in comparison to Sony's native and 3rd party options, but I don't know if I should view this (and their cost) as a deal breaker when it comes to ecosystem longevity. Since I'm getting back into photography, the plan would be to go with an FE 28-70 mm F3.5-5.6 OSS for the Sony or a NIKKOR Z 24-70mm f/4 S for the Nikon. I chose these simply because they seem decent, well rounded, and are economical. I am open to any/all suggestions you would have when it comes to cameras or glass options if you think there's something else to consider. This is just where my research has taken me so far. If by chance you get this message and have an opportunity to respond, thank you in advance for any time and consideration!
Hi Griffin, It sounds like you have an alternatives dilemma. Options are a good thing. Both cameras you noted at the end of the day will accomplish the same thing. I have shot Nikon over 15 years and big fan of what they have done. Sony A7III is older at this point and probably does not get any more firmware updates (I could be wrong). On the other hand Z6II is only year old and more great firmware updates are coming. There is no question that image quality and lenses that Nikon produces are brilliant. Given that you have done such as extensive research, the best way for anyone to decide on an alternative is to do a quick analysis. One of my videos on my channel “The Best Camera for You 100%” will guide you how to do this analysis. Feel free to watch and follow and you will lend on exactly what you need. Good luck. Hope it helps.
@@TouchLifeStudio Thank you for responding so quickly. I'm going to watch your video now, but think I'm going to run with the Nikon (this is probably the 5th time I've gone back and forth). Will reach back out if i have questions after viewing your video. Thanks!
@@LawMan786 I’m having the same dilemma, but I’ve mostly shot Nikon so do have old lenses. I was happy to hear you don’t “need” Z lenses, as they seem bigger and more expensive than Sony equivalents and lack the 3rd party options. I had an A6300 and while pics were good, the interface and controls/ergonomics were not. I swapped to Fuji, but while loving the mirror less experience I miss the quality of my Nikon DSLR. I’m probably going to make a choice during Feb, before a holiday. I’d love to hear how you get on. Best wishes for whichever you choose.
Pana S1H, Canon R6 are also alternatives, but at this point the best bang for the buck in full frame, not only photo, but also photo + video, is the Z6 II, if you're new to a system. Sony A7 IV is a dud, and in my opinion worse than the A7 III in many aspects.
Hello. I'm a Nikon D90 user and now planning to upgrade it to mirrorless. However, bit confused between Nikon Z6ii and Canon R7. Mainly into wildlife therefor need strong autofocus. Heard few negative remarks regarding autofocus of Nikon Z6ii in wildlife. If any Nikon Z6ii user can help me out with better understanding of Nikon Z6ii in wildlife.
Thank you for your questions. I’m not familiar with the R7 autofocus as I have not used R7 personally; however, the R5 has a great autofocus and I can personally speak for that. Nikon Z6 II has an OK autofocus and more suited for portraiture. That’s not to say that one can not used the Z6II for wildlife. It also much depends on type of wildlife. If not too fast than Z6II is good for that; however, if you are considering for birding than Z6II would not be my tool of choice. If you find that others say good things about the R7 for wildlife and there is plenty of others who supports that point of view, than yes, go for it.
z7ii or z6ii for portraits? Or it doesn't really make a big difference when editing?
Both cameras will do well. The Z7II will just have more details with a 45 mpx sensor. Z6II has a 24 Mpx sensor. However both cameras are virtually the same.
@@TouchLifeStudio Thank you for replying, would you upgrade from the Z6ii or yould you instead try to get the Z9 or Z8 when it comes out?... Thanks.
@@felm.974 I have been using the Z9 for over 6 months. However the Z6 II is a fantastic camera and I use it frequently. Z9 had different case uses.
What is this camera like for night time photography
Very nice. Depending if you are using a tripod or not and level of low light. In my recent video Street Photography with Nikon Z6II, I touch on night time photography with this camera. You may find it useful.
Hi, can you take photo during video recording?
I don’t believe so, However, I haven’t tried so.
@@TouchLifeStudio I had this situation several times, recording video however taking photo is also needed. I could do it with my Panasonic but the feature limited to 1080p recording and the photo also taken on 1080p.
Sorry, am I missing something says the video came out 2 years ago and the camera was just released.
I leave mine on all the time when I am using because it’s got auto shut off
Get a 70-200 .. you have an Ultra Wide Angle and you also Have a 50mm 70-200 will just be a balance
I addition On Continuous shutter mode there's no Black out from my experience
Yes, I ended up getting the 70-200. Great lens.
I recently purchased a z6ii with the very same flash and trigger. How do you handle the issue of the viewfinder not displaying accurately when adjusting shutter speed? Here is a video describing the issue. How do you manage through this? MU Nikon DSLR did not have this issue. kzhead.info/sun/d8V6qJeQq4edrGw/bejne.html
Thank you for your question. This is how mirrorless work. I recommend shooting in TTL mode. You may need to disable the flash for a moment just to see your current ambient exposure. Using the TTL mode, it will help you to add just enough light for your subject. Hope this helps. Best of luck.
So move up from my D750 and buy one?.
Wait for the mark iii
12:00 but that is a crop DX mode lens, equivalent to about a 27-52mm F2.8. It uses only a small part of the Z6 sensor and results in 10MP photos - instead of the full 24MP. At 10MP, any low light high ISO noise and CA will be extremely visible in video and photo. Why would you tell that this is a great combo? 10MP photos from a 2000€ camera is a joke. You'd be much better off, buying a second hand Nikon 24-70 2.8G or Tamron/sigma equivalent. You'd also be a lot wider than 27mm this 18-35mm crop lens is giving.
Why don't you try tamron or Sigma 24-70 f2.8 instead of S lenses? They probably cost 40% of S lenses
You are absolutely correct. It’s defiantly cheaper. End results are probably very close. I wanted to eliminate the FTZ adapter and only use with lenses that I don’t use daily. Tamron and Sigma lenses are great solutions but they don’t provide that extra stabilization from lenses as the S line lens would.
You are absolutely correct. It’s defiantly cheaper. End results are probably very close. I wanted to eliminate the FTZ adapter and only use with lenses that I don’t use daily. Tamron and Sigma lenses are great solutions but they don’t provide that extra stabilization from lenses as the S line lens would.
Don't you have black-outs when the mirror flips up in DSLRs?????????????
Yep, very slight. Z6II has longer black outs.
@@TouchLifeStudio I have the Z7, they seem to be no longer than my D7200.
Please turn on the translator. Thanks
I'd rather have the sensor exposed than the shutter Like cannon the shutter mech is way more fragile.
Hello \0/ You can helm me calibrate the focus F of the lens 24-70 2.8 ED
FTZ II adapter
I prefer zoom lenses as it allows me to crop before taking the picture and it saves me a lot of moving around
Makes sense
The new Peter McKinnon?
Sorry but using this box would drive me nuts I would be so focused on the box and not on anything else, it would have the opposite affect... prefere single focused point than this
My biggest reason to slowly upgrade my lenses is due to the jump from DX to Full Frame.
Carmelo Treviso, that’s great. Full frame lenses can be nicely used on the DX cameras. Best of luck my friend.
Ja na tebja xot posmotrju. Lublju tebja, moi sinok
Your are 100% better off witht the Godox system trust me it's just about 100% reliable and the range is Ridiculous and the eco system lets you controll everything from the 200 to 600 flawlesly & their flashes are a game changer...
Yes, learning to adapt to Godox System. I used pocket wizards with my DSLR which was flawless in my experience. Godox certainly has a lot more compatibility across their products and in hope to continue building my off camera flash set with Godox.
@Touch Life Studio Not to mention their prices are so Affordable LOL
@@PaparazziEntertainment 100% agree
Hey mate...nice list but you left out what was most important....Autofocus....All the others don't matter that much. So you left what it was most important thing...Strange...LOL
Thx for the comment. I believe I covered the AF around 18:21
@@TouchLifeStudio Yeah you did but never said how good , bad or reliable it is. You just said it has a few options which every camera has .
When just you said the camera is an 8 and not 10bit camera i stopped watching. Man even some 1500US cameras nowdays are 10bit but the z6 and mark 2? Pfff its out of my list from the race of 3 cameras that i wanted to buy
Yes, Z6II is an 8 bit camera. Keep in mind this camera is about 4 years old. While I shoot on other cameras which are 10-bit, in my experience, when areas are property lit, it does not make huge difference. Proper lighting and is way more important.
I'm a Nikon Z6II shooter and you tell far from the whole and true story, why not?
What's the whole and true story?
@@mellsc766 I agree - what is the whole and true story?
What annoying shutther sound. No like
most people have no interest in weddings, you shouldn't be changing lenses you'd have more than one body on a beach ?? stop moaning for clicks