What is ChatGPT doing...and why does it work?

2023 ж. 16 Ақп.
2 129 588 Рет қаралды

Stephen Wolfram hosts a live and unscripted Ask Me Anything about ChatGPT for all ages. Find the playlist of Q&A's here: wolfr.am/youtube-sw-qa
Originally livestreamed at: / stephen_wolfram
9:55 SW starts talking
Follow us on our official social media channels.
Twitter: / wolframresearch
Facebook: / wolframresearch
Instagram: / wolframresearch
LinkedIn: / wolfram-research
Contribute to the official Wolfram Community: community.wolfram.com/
Stay up-to-date on the latest interest at Wolfram Research through our blog: blog.wolfram.com/
Follow Stephen Wolfram's life, interests, and what makes him tick on his blog: writings.stephenwolfram.com/

Пікірлер
  • Starts at 9:53 1:16:25 breakthrough in 2012 1:57:35 "It's crazy that things like this work"

    @michaeljmcguffin@michaeljmcguffin Жыл бұрын
  • Watching this videos is a great way to review all this things and understand them again, maybe a little better. Thank you very much.

    @dr.bogenbroom894@dr.bogenbroom894 Жыл бұрын
  • video timestamps 0:09:53 - start of presentation, intro 0:12:16 - language model definition 0:15:30 - “temperature” parameter 0:17:20 - Wolfram Desktop demo of GPT2 0:18:50 - generate a sentence with GPT2 0:25:56 - unigram model 0:31:10 - bigram model 0:33:00 - ngram model 0:38:50 - why a model is needed 0:39:00 - definition of a “model” 0:39:20 - early modeling example: Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment 0:43:55 - handwritten digit recognition task 0:47:40 - using neural nets to recognize handwritten digits 0:51:31 - key idea: attractors 0:53:35 - neural nets and attractors 0:54:44 - walking through a simple neural net 1:01:50 - what’s going inside a neural net during classification 1:06:12 - training a neural net to correctly compute a function 1:09:10 - measuring “correctness” of neural net with “loss” 1:10:41 - reduce “loss” with gradient descent 1:17:06 - escaping local minima in higher dimensional space 1:21:15 - the generalizability of neural nets 1:28:06 - supervised learning 1:30:47 - transfer learning 1:32:35 - unsupervised learning 1:34:40 - training LeNet, a handwritten digit recognizer 1:38:14 - embeddings, representing words with numbers 1:42:12 - softmax layer 1:42:47 - embedding layer 1:46:22 - GPT2 embeddings of words 1:47:40 - ChatGPT’s basic architecture 1:48:00 - Transformers 1:52:50 - Attention block 1:59:00 - amount of text training data on the web 2:03:35 - relationship between trillions of words and weights in the network 2:09:40 - reinforcement learning from human feedback 2:12:38 - Why does ChatGPT work? Regularity and structure in human language 2:15:50 - ChatGPT learns syntactic grammar 2:19:30 - ChatGPT’s limitation in balancing parentheses 2:20:51 - ChatGPT learns [inductive] logic based on all the training data it’s seen 2:23:57 - What regularities Stephen Wolfram guesses that ChatGPT has discovered 2:24:11 - ChatGPT navigating the meaning space of words 2:34:50 - ChatGPT’s limitation in mathematical computation 2:36:20 - ChatGPT possibly discovering semantic grammar 2:38:17 - a fundamental limit of neural nets is performing irreducible computations 2:41:09 - Q&A 2:41:16 - Question 1: “Are constructed languages like Esperanto more amenable to semantic grammar AI approach?” 2:43:14 - Question 2 2:32:37 - Question 3: token limits 2:45:00 - Question 4: tension between superintelligence and computational irreducibility. How far can LLM intelligence go? 2:52:12 - Question 5 2:53:22 - Question 6: pretraining a large biologically inspired language model 2:55:46 - Question 7: 5 senses multimodal model 2:56:25 - Question 8: the creativity of AI image generation 2:59:17 - Question 9: how does ChatGPT avoid controversial topics? Taught through reinforcement learning + possibly a list of controversial words 3:03:26 - Question 10: neural nets vs other living multicellular intelligence, principle of computational equivalence 3:04:45 - Human consciousness 3:06:40 - Question 11: automated fact checking for ChatGPT via an adversarial network. Train ChatGPT with WolframAlpha? 3:07:25 - Question 12: Can ChatGPT play a text-based adventure game? 3:07:43 - Question 13: What makes GPT3 so good at language? 3:08:22 - Question 14: Could feature impact scores help us understand GPT better? 3:09:48 - Question 15: ChatGPT’s understanding of implications 3:10:34 - Question 16: the human brain’s ability to learn 3:13:07 - Question 17: how difficult will it be for individuals to train a personal ChatGPT that behaves like a clone of the user?

    @carson_tang@carson_tang Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks. A. Ton!

      @AmuhAje@AmuhAje Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks 🙏🏾

      @Kami84@Kami84 Жыл бұрын
    • 😊 Appreciate it!!!

      @lowcountrydogos3142@lowcountrydogos314211 ай бұрын
    • Most significant comment of our time 😂

      @shinequashie393@shinequashie39311 ай бұрын
    • 😊😊😊😊😊😊

      @raymondloh25@raymondloh2511 ай бұрын
  • The most important thing that should be on everyone's mind currently should be to invest in different sources of income that doesn't depend on the government. Especially with the current economic crisis around the word. This is still a good time to invest in various stocks, Gold, silver and digital currencies.

    @lailaalfaddil7389@lailaalfaddil738910 ай бұрын
    • S

      @KJ-sv8re@KJ-sv8re10 ай бұрын
  • Thank you so much ! I learned more in these 3 hours than in months of watching other videos about this subject. It would be great if more knowledgeable people used youtube to share their experiences. 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

    @anonymous.youtuber@anonymous.youtuber Жыл бұрын
    • Difference between qualified and unqualified people. Basically its the difference between a radio DJ and college proffesor, yeah.

      @porkbun1555@porkbun155510 ай бұрын
    • ​@porkbun1555

      @lrncexml_@lrncexml_10 ай бұрын
    • @lrncexml_@lrncexml_10 ай бұрын
    • ​ n

      @lrncexml_@lrncexml_10 ай бұрын
    • @@porkbun1555

      @bog202@bog2029 ай бұрын
  • The teachings on this channel are always top notch so informative and easy to understand, it's very hard to find good content online these days

    @martinsriggs2441@martinsriggs244110 ай бұрын
    • I agree with you on everything, these days finding a financial mentor is a tough challenge which is why I am happy and grateful to have been introduced to my mentor Larry Kent Burton by a friend. I made a lot of money in just two months working with him for just a small investment

      @charleyluckey2232@charleyluckey223210 ай бұрын
    • Who exactly is this Mr. Larry? what does he do? And how can I take advantage of him

      @martinsriggs2441@martinsriggs244110 ай бұрын
    • Sorry for interrupting your conversation, just wanted to add to everything, Mr. Larry is a miracle trader, he helped me grow my trading account from just $ 3200 to over $ 11000, I can confidently say anyone who invests with him you are guaranteed to make profits

      @barbaragimbel3646@barbaragimbel364610 ай бұрын
    • @@martinsriggs2441 He is a financial advisor and investor, he helps people to better understand the financial markets and he also does trading and investing on your behalf

      @charleyluckey2232@charleyluckey223210 ай бұрын
    • Getting in touch with him is very simple. Just follow him on Instagram

      @charleyluckey2232@charleyluckey223210 ай бұрын
  • let me guess… everyone fell asleep and then woke up to this livestream playing, am i right?

    @duhmiyah@duhmiyah9 ай бұрын
  • this took me a few days to get through... in a good way so much good stuff here, such a great instructor... great ways of explaining and visual aids Amazed Mr. Wolfram is as generous with his time as to share his insights and be as open with everyone given he has many companies to run and problems to solve. i love engineering😊

    @ericdefazio4197@ericdefazio4197 Жыл бұрын
    • as a radical thinker/CS student studying some graduate level mathematical logic. Wolfram is one of my "12 disciplies", i.e. he's a holy figure to me.

      @ai_serf@ai_serf Жыл бұрын
    • Blacks are always the criminals, poor, in the background, asking questions and subordinate in Hollywood movies. Its an agenda. The China film administration is better than Hollywood. Hollwood really Hates Black on Blacks Love. Black men not allowed to have their own Hair & must be bald headed in every single Hollywood movie.

      @GeneRex-qe7lo@GeneRex-qe7lo9 ай бұрын
    • "Amazed Mr. Wolfram is as generous with his time..." Then maybe you'd be interested in buying his book.

      @cdorman11@cdorman117 ай бұрын
  • Here's a question: how much does the wording of the questions afect it's answers? - Presumably if it just tries to continue, if you make errors, it ought to make more errors after too, right? - How about if you ask with "uneducated" language vs scientific? - Rather than just affect the tone, would it also affect the contents? - What if you speak in a way it has associated with certain biases? - Who knows what kinds of patterns it has came up with, considering it "discovered" those "semantic grammars" we as humans aren't even aware of ...

    @Verrisin@Verrisin Жыл бұрын
  • starts at 9:50

    @at0mly@at0mly Жыл бұрын
    • thanks. appreciated

      @harrykekgmail@harrykekgmail Жыл бұрын
  • Love this. I knew a lot of this, but it was still great to hear it expressed in a clear and systematic way.

    @ivanjelenic5627@ivanjelenic56277 ай бұрын
    • True, I also thought of it the same way you take your phone, just start typing and just spam whatever autocorrect thinks the best next word is as the principle of its work. Didn't think it can get this good.

      @2nxtlvlstudio@2nxtlvlstudio5 ай бұрын
  • Amazing & super helpful!!! I really enjoyed watching it and learned a lot.

    @fatemehcheginisalzmann2189@fatemehcheginisalzmann2189 Жыл бұрын
  • Expertly explained in a way understandable to a large set if people. Bravo.

    @carlhopkinson@carlhopkinson8 ай бұрын
  • Amazing presentation. If I were to experiment with machine learning I would examine small-world networks instead of layered networks. And try genetic algorithms such as randomly adjusting the network into a number of variations, then pick the best candidate and repeat the adjustment for the new candidate and continue iterating until a desired outcome is found.

    @Anders01@Anders01 Жыл бұрын
    • Ya, that's been done actually. research the various AI/ML models and research papers. btw, the 'layered networks' is kind of a useful structure for 'adjusting the network into a number of variations'

      @thorcook@thorcook10 ай бұрын
  • Thank you so much Mr. Wolfram, you really shed light in some areas I had not fully grasped before!

    @eqcatvids@eqcatvids Жыл бұрын
  • I'd Love to see more in-depth analysis like this on the current LLM topic utilizing Dr. Wolfram in this format. Exceptional content. As an aside I've really been missing the physics project live streams.

    @JustinHedge@JustinHedge Жыл бұрын
    • ‘We U6😊

      @joymaehbagcat2108@joymaehbagcat21089 ай бұрын
    • m.kzhead.info/sun/qc2dkax8rYqDf6c/bejne.html

      @gabrielescheler2522@gabrielescheler25224 күн бұрын
  • This was the most fascinating and informative discussion, particularly, your responses to commenters! Please post the link to the paper you recently wrote (?) that inspired this live video discussion. And thank you!

    @WarrenLacefield@WarrenLacefield Жыл бұрын
  • Remarkable talk, simply outstanding!

    @williammixson2541@williammixson2541 Жыл бұрын
  • The weights are Gaussian because they are constrained to be during training via layer normalisation. It makes the gradient signal flow better.

    @BradCordovaAI@BradCordovaAI Жыл бұрын
  • About ChatGPT, very few people are telling the truth and Wolframe is the most powerful one ❤ Thank you very much, Steve Wolfram ❤

    @chenwilliam5176@chenwilliam517610 ай бұрын
  • Amazing presentation. Thank you so much !👍👍👍

    @robertgoldbornatyout@robertgoldbornatyout11 ай бұрын
  • At 33:49, it's interesting how the text looks more like English the longer the character length. Great video.

    @dockdrumming@dockdrumming Жыл бұрын
  • Privet! You can produce well. Electrifying i find Your channel is getting ridiculously well. I can watched repeat again! Keep going.

    @louisjinhui1420@louisjinhui1420 Жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely love these sessions!!

    @stormos25one@stormos25one Жыл бұрын
  • This was amazing... never watched a lecture from Stephen and he's an amazing teacher.

    @stachowi@stachowi10 ай бұрын
  • Very insightful area to learn from. Thank you.

    @user-qq5kv1ce2h@user-qq5kv1ce2h9 ай бұрын
  • Nicely done, Stephen. This is a great introduction for a novice. Your talk creates great intuition. You made the embeddings seem simple as a prebaked unchanging part of the entire NN. Also the breaking up of the "feature signature" makes parallelism possible through the various attention heads. One missing idea that you might include at some point is how signals can be added, basically the Fourier series.

    @dr.mikeybee@dr.mikeybee Жыл бұрын
  • very easy to understand ....amazing method of sir...thanks

    @misterjahan9557@misterjahan955710 ай бұрын
  • asked chat to quit reminding me it was a language model because i personally find more it easier to converse if i treat them as if they were another being. there was a rather long pause, then chat came back and for all intensive purposes was a very polite and helpful uh... person? dunno how to regard them, they're awesome tho :)

    @YogonKalisto@YogonKalisto Жыл бұрын
  • Incredible work, thank you.

    @aleph2d@aleph2d11 ай бұрын
  • Great video, Wolfram! As someone who's fascinated by AI, I found your explanation of Chat GPT's inner workings to be very informative. One thing I found myself wondering while watching the video was how Chat GPT compares to other language models out there. Have you done any comparisons with other models, and if so, how does Chat GPT stack up? I also think it would be interesting if you could have delved a bit more into the ethical considerations surrounding the use of language models like Chat GPT. For example, what steps can we take to ensure that these models aren't being used to spread misinformation or reinforce harmful biases? Overall, though, great job breaking down such a complex topic in an accessible way!

    @joelarsenault5615@joelarsenault5615 Жыл бұрын
    • A

      @JB-pe6nw@JB-pe6nw3 ай бұрын
  • In essence, this sort of weighed inference about an existing corpus, can only produce a deterministic set of possibilities, even if this set is enormous. We have a general problem with the notion of "intelligence", insofar as we rarely consider the difference between functional knowledge and knowledge production. These approaches to AI can produce new knowledge within the extant corpus - they can help discover previously unknown, optimal relations in the existing corpus, and that is useful, but it cannot produce new paradigms about the world. Intelligence is more than the ability to infer relations ; it is the ability to change the entire coordinate system of the corpus by altering the vantage point of the observer. For this to be possible, there has to be a higher-order, synthetic model of the corpus, based on what we call logic, which is the opposite of the brute-force approach of LLMs. What we may need, to produce new paradigms, is a sparse model that embeds key structures in the language of concepts.

    @phpn99@phpn99 Жыл бұрын
  • Oh wait your the website that helps me rearrange formulas. Thanks I’ve used it so much

    @xb2856@xb2856 Жыл бұрын
  • Thank you very much Professor Stephen,

    @Hagiosgraphe@Hagiosgraphe Жыл бұрын
  • I fell asleep with youtube on and im at this

    @LeakedCone@LeakedCone10 ай бұрын
    • same

      @oliviasavenue.@oliviasavenue.9 ай бұрын
    • same😂

      @RickyVickyQin@RickyVickyQin9 ай бұрын
    • Same

      @mohdharwwfc@mohdharwwfc9 ай бұрын
    • JDHSJAHAHW SAME

      @psbm4@psbm49 ай бұрын
    • Same

      @Commander_Egg69@Commander_Egg699 ай бұрын
  • Thank you very much for sharing your knowledge!

    @CA-pj9pl@CA-pj9pl Жыл бұрын
  • Those paths through meaning space are fascinating, Stephen. I would call each one a context signature. In auto-regressive training, we are looking for the next token. Why not look for the next context signature? In fact, why not train a model using graphical context signatures? Then decode replies. Other than training with graphical context signatures, in essence, I believe this is what's occurring when training a transformer. The addition of signal from the entire context is retrieving the next token so that token by token a context signature is retrieved. But is it possible to retrieve an entire context signature and then decode it? I wonder how much efficiency one could achieve with this method. Moreover, I wonder how well a convolutional NN would handle training from graphical context signatures? If you want to discover physic-like laws of semantic motion, this might be a way in.

    @dr.mikeybee@dr.mikeybee Жыл бұрын
    • 😊😊

      @baljkabaljka5520@baljkabaljka55208 ай бұрын
  • So amazing ! Thank you for explaining

    @rehanAllahwala1@rehanAllahwala110 ай бұрын
  • Very useful and weel presented content, Stephen! Thank you for this and for all your work and research!

    @AlexandreRangel@AlexandreRangel11 ай бұрын
    • CB. C.

      @arceusboki@arceusboki6 ай бұрын
  • I would love to get Noam Chomsky's comments on the idea of "semantic grammar." It seems fairly compelling. Thanks. I also think the parenthesis grammar as a hand-hold for understanding these models is a great idea.

    @briancase9527@briancase9527 Жыл бұрын
  • Could the randomness process for choosing the next probable word within a certain temperature parameter be consigned to a quantum random process? If so, an essay could be viewed as a flat plane or an entire terrain with peaks and troughs.Within this paradigm, a certain style of writer could be viewed as a dynamic sheet, similar to how different materials when laid over a ragged topology should comply and not comply with what it is laid on top of. With this quantum process an overall view of the essay could be judged at an aesthetic level from most pleasing to least on several different qualities concurrently and not mutually exclusively making an approximate or some sort of conscious viewer

    @shrodingersman@shrodingersman Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent...learned so much.

    @christineodonnell2711@christineodonnell2711 Жыл бұрын
  • Good analysis. Please do more of this

    @anilkumarsaxena@anilkumarsaxena10 ай бұрын
  • Logic, concepts, math, ie "deterministic processes" seems to be missing in this language models (LMs). Either we can identify where or how the model reflect this abilities and work from that, or maybe we could use other types of models like logic indictors, "demostrators" etc in conjunction with LMs. On the one hand humans are capable both of "unconsiuos intuition" (similar to LMs), on the other, we can reason, we have formal languages etc. To me, that combination of abilities is what define human intelligence.

    @dr.bogenbroom894@dr.bogenbroom894 Жыл бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/qc2dkax8rYqDf6c/bejne.html

      @gabrielescheler2522@gabrielescheler252211 күн бұрын
  • What comments would you make about notable observations between different culture's outputs given similar topics as inputs using ChatGPT 4?

    @doowey22@doowey22 Жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for sharing your insights and all the good questions. It's really lonely to not being in an academic environment or a company about ML and AI.

    @IsaacChickenWong@IsaacChickenWong Жыл бұрын
    • 31:04 ❤Love ❤usa❤

      @damionm121@damionm121 Жыл бұрын
    • 😅You

      @damionm121@damionm121 Жыл бұрын
  • That's very useful information, because you don't really know where to start investigating the topic. It's also impressive, that the Wolfram language can manage a representation of that mechanism. What surprises me, however, is how ChatGPT includes different contexts in its predictions, because there are certainly multiple interpretations of the large number of learned text structures if the context is not clearly defined at the beginning of the conversation.

    @Klangraum@Klangraum Жыл бұрын
    • Ppp

      @catalinfilipoiu3264@catalinfilipoiu32649 ай бұрын
    • Pppl

      @catalinfilipoiu3264@catalinfilipoiu32649 ай бұрын
  • Dear Stephen, I am a grateful viewer of your videos. Please consider using the awesome capabilities of Wolfram Alpha( or other Wolfram tools) to: a) convert the audio from your videos into text. b) created a segmented time line of your video by topic/question. Video is wonderful, but hard to search. Your _History of Science_ videos are a unique resource that will be valuable far into the future. It's possible that no one has ever illuminated scientific discoveries, from multiple angles, as well as you.

    @sillystuff6247@sillystuff6247 Жыл бұрын
    • This is a great idea, imo.

      @JustinHedge@JustinHedge Жыл бұрын
    • The subtitles are generated automatically by youtube, and it’s pretty much 99%+ accurate... look for CC in the options. It’s pretty much a solved problem for standard speech. And it’s been for years

      @xl000@xl000 Жыл бұрын
    • @@xl000 Agreed, I think he meant just like the manual subjection transcription summary feature, which is probably another thing already essentially automated. Probably as simple as enabling it in the upstream process, just YT nice-to-haves.

      @JustinHedge@JustinHedge Жыл бұрын
    • If you can program in Python, you can use the Whisper module from OpenAI to transcribe audio to text. The YT channel Part Time Larry had a video where he shows how to extract videos from YT and transcribe them.

      @ozne_2358@ozne_2358 Жыл бұрын
  • This was a fantastic video to watch

    @ericritchie9363@ericritchie9363 Жыл бұрын
  • I can't read your screens that you display. Is there a way that you could provide so that it is easier to read for those of us with accessibility challenges? Thank you. Thank you for all your contributions.

    @PeggyMiles@PeggyMiles Жыл бұрын
  • Beyond any doubt, this is the best lecture for understanding what lies behind NLP and NLU. I find that many professionals who work with models don't understand why these models work so well and what they do. You can't get the depth of understanding of semantic space as you get from this video from reading Attention is All You Need. That understanding is missed. I wonder how this understanding happened. Was it found piecemeal, or was accidental? Was it understood after this architecture first worked?

    @dr.mikeybee@dr.mikeybee Жыл бұрын
  • Greatest primer/teaser for genetic algorithms and neural networks that I've seen Thanx

    @SR-hm7cf@SR-hm7cf Жыл бұрын
  • This is a LONG video truthfully. But very informative as it should be with the length of it

    @laquanlewis1590@laquanlewis159010 ай бұрын
  • ChatGPT is excellent at answering questions about Western music theory, but in some cases the initial answer needs prompting, especially when accounting for enharmonic equivalents.

    @mitchkahle314@mitchkahle314 Жыл бұрын
  • I really like how he explained everything. Oh, how I wish I didn't sleep during math class.🤣🤣

    @fram1111@fram111110 ай бұрын
  • Many thanks Stephen! I absolutely enjoyed the step by step introduction into the layers of the matter. However it is obvious that we are still on the technical/mechanical side of the whole journey. Still none is able to explain the concept and reality of infinity, or "1" or "0", but an honest struggle towards that wisdom may open new paths in learning and lead to brilliant discoveries.

    @cakiral@cakiral Жыл бұрын
    • What i find interesting is how similar an action potential and binary boolean values are so similar neuron during an action potential the nueron can be considered state is 1 and 0 when it is not. biological based memory. basically could start as bubble memory but in organic form. if there was a system that was able to interface with a neuron if the system was addressable it wouldn't matter what neuon migrated to what interface point the addressing would just need to be adjust to correct the nuerons connection. example neuron that migrated to connection point for the eye to correct instead of the thumb just change the port address.

      @immaballin247@immaballin247 Жыл бұрын
  • What I find interesting is how they inject the objective pattern recognition into the model to aid in figuring out puzzles and riddles. It will provide extensive reasoning on how it arrived at its answer. GPT-4 really excels in this ability and has a great sense of humor to go with it.

    @jeffwads@jeffwads Жыл бұрын
    • I guess that only works for riddles that were already solved and the reasoning is already established from someone, where Chatgpt got his data from. I don’t think it could solve any riddle by itself… It can hardly do easiest algebra.

      @marcbaxter5996@marcbaxter599610 ай бұрын
  • Ah. That's why they call the API "completion". I worked with something called "Hidden Markov Models" to decompose documents and recognize parts like title, author, subject etc. this was done by training on already labelled documents until the model had a "path" of most likely joined words.

    @389293912@3892939123 ай бұрын
  • Great! Superb lesson. Thank you! However, I felt confused at 56:58 when Stephen says "At every step we are just collecting the values of the neurons from the previous layer, multiplying them by weights, add a constant offset, applying that activation ReLU, to get this value -3.8". I think the numerical values next to neurons are before applying the ReLU, otherwise they all have to be nonnegative. And the last layer does not apply ReLU in order to get the -1 attractor. Am I correct?

    @arnaldoabrantes6169@arnaldoabrantes6169 Жыл бұрын
  • This is super interesting and I’m learning a lot, thank you for this video. I do feel the amount times I hear “ugh” and “um” is really off putting. Sorry if that’s nitpicky but I almost can’t make it through the beginning because of ugh. Um. Ugh.

    @TheMaxmelner@TheMaxmelner10 ай бұрын
  • Should be awarded a NOBEL prize for this tutorial. Well played.....

    @drewsabine1897@drewsabine18977 ай бұрын
  • I noticed while using ChatGPT that it doesn’t use underline/italics/bold for emphasis, could they in the future include that to relay some emotion back from ChatGPT maybe? I have seen “!” used by it for that.

    @skylineuk1485@skylineuk1485 Жыл бұрын
  • Thank you so much !

    @thecutestcat897@thecutestcat897 Жыл бұрын
  • By god this is such a good explanation, thank you

    @pectenmaximus231@pectenmaximus231 Жыл бұрын
  • I use it a lot to help me write and fix code and also to explain things for me or piece things things together. It's a great partner/tool to use if you have some good input and existing knowledge

    @pandabearguy1@pandabearguy1 Жыл бұрын
  • Great video Stephen!

    @skylineuk1485@skylineuk1485 Жыл бұрын
  • Who would have thought that conversation was a slightly random walk through probable clumps of letters and words? Fascinating. I have to say, though, I think it's actually the human reinforcement that gives particular clumpings their perceptible meaningfulness.

    @FanResearch@FanResearch10 ай бұрын
    • kzhead.info/sun/nqaJoL6DkZVud5s/bejne.html (good)

      @BabaChannel90@BabaChannel909 ай бұрын
  • I speculate it does have a “global plan” of what to say next, instead of one word at a time. It implicitly has a representation of the joint probability distribution of what’s to be continued… Prompting kind of bring out that distribution… which you can extract knowledge, in current its form, some piece of text (but may be other modalities in the near future). i was convinced by Sutskever’s take more.

    @kawingchan@kawingchan Жыл бұрын
  • i fall asleep once, and this is what I wake up to? aha

    @hannahhillier5511@hannahhillier551110 ай бұрын
    • HOW ME TOO

      @yastraw@yastraw9 ай бұрын
  • Great sharing my dear Have a NICE day STAY connect FULL Watching

    @netquemientay-westerncount8399@netquemientay-westerncount839910 ай бұрын
  • Great info Thx!👍

    @Ti-JAC@Ti-JAC8 ай бұрын
  • very compelling, I like your take on how there's a, sort of, throttle in everything. never thought trying to understand AI would be so much fun...

    @prowebmaster5873@prowebmaster5873 Жыл бұрын
  • The onion rooting protocol isn't as anonymous as you think it is. Whomever controls the exit notes controls the traffic. Which makes me in control.

    @user-dt1hx3mb4b@user-dt1hx3mb4b10 ай бұрын
  • Thank you.

    @xy4489@xy4489 Жыл бұрын
  • 1:18:58 the art of training 1:32:25 training LLMs 1:52:47 attention 1:56:20 attention blocks 2:08:57 neurons have memory

    @_fox_face@_fox_face15 күн бұрын
  • Can the wheights and biases be complex numbers insteadnof reals? And what effect does it have on performance?

    @ChazyK@ChazyK Жыл бұрын
  • 2:14:02 Stephen says "verbs and nouns go this way..." and shows the old - very old! as old as Aristotle - idea of context-free phase structure grammar based on subject-predicate - but that's a wrong idea, because the real grammar of English is both simpler and more elaborate. *The Natural Topology of English* includes subject-predicate as one of its basic forms, but there are others, such as event = agent + action + object which is an instance of concept - relation - concept

    @Silly.Old.Sisyphus@Silly.Old.Sisyphus11 ай бұрын
  • 我很樂意看到更多像這樣的關於利用博士的當前 LLM 主題的深入分析。

    @MD-kf1cn@MD-kf1cn Жыл бұрын
  • One aspect I disagree with from Steven's perspective is that the reinforcement learning feedback loop step it's not actually a major piece of the success of ChatGPT. You could create a very similar version using contextual memory buffers with the raw davincii-003 model. The RLHF just fine tuned 'good' responses and probably more importantly weighted some of the negative/moral issues with certain things you could generate. There's obviously been an additional, further layer of moderation bolted onto the top, for obvious reasons.

    @JustinHedge@JustinHedge Жыл бұрын
  • In semiotics, there is "pragmatics," as well as syntactics and semantics. Communication is purposeful, about something or someone, rather than about predicting the next word. There is always some motivation behind utterances, which in turn are predisposed by "beliefs" and "values." So there is cognition, yes, but also affective and psychomotor skill domains involved. When "natural language processors" begin to present (and see) themselves as agents with a memory at least of their own experiences with you (and others), conversations will be more interesting. As more and more complex ideas and concepts (gained, say, from reading text with attention to those, rather than to words per se) can be mapped in some "meaning space" which can be transitioned in the direction of the allegorical, metaphorical, or hypothetical (and thus creative), the closer we will come to AGI.

    @WarrenLacefield@WarrenLacefield Жыл бұрын
    • "Your description of the different components of communication in semiotics is accurate. Pragmatics refers to the way language is used in context to achieve a specific goal or purpose, while syntax and semantics deal with the structure and meaning of language itself. And as you note, communication is influenced by a wide range of factors, including cognitive, affective, and psychomotor skills, as well as beliefs, values, and experiences. Regarding natural language processors and their potential to evolve towards AGI, it is indeed an exciting area of research. As these systems become more sophisticated, they will be able to parse and understand complex ideas and concepts, as well as respond with more creativity and nuance. However, achieving true AGI will require advances in many other areas beyond natural language processing, including machine learning, robotics, and computer vision. In any case, the development of more advanced natural language processing systems will undoubtedly have a major impact on the way we interact with technology and with each other, and may bring us closer to a future where machines and humans can communicate with each other in truly meaningful and productive ways." So says ChatGPT when prompted by what you wrote which, itself, was a response prompted by your reflections on the issue. I do actually agree, and this strikes me as the essential thesis behind "The embodied mind", brilliantly explained in a series of books by the philosopher of Mind Andy Clark.

      @pascalbercker7487@pascalbercker7487 Жыл бұрын
    • Also see the notion of implicatures. Pretty fascinating subject.

      @xl000@xl000 Жыл бұрын
  • This is fascinating! Any chance there's a Cliff's notes or something?

    @BKNOverwatchDigital@BKNOverwatchDigital11 ай бұрын
  • His example of unsupervised learning around 1:33:00 seems like supervised learning to me.

    @elliottFamily2@elliottFamily25 ай бұрын
  • Here is Wolfram knowing the exact number of words he has sent in email!! WOW!

    @stormos25one@stormos25one Жыл бұрын
  • Fascinating. Love the demystification. Like unpacking how the greatest magic trick in the world is accomplished. Inspiring! Idea generating! Thank you, Wolfram!

    @Joeyrobertparks@Joeyrobertparks10 ай бұрын
    • Blacks are always the criminals, poor, in the background, asking questions and subordinate in Hollywood movies. Its an agenda. The China film administration is better than Hollywood. Hollwood really Hates Black on Blacks Love. Black men not allowed to have their own Hair & must be bald headed in every single Hollywood movie.

      @GeneRex-qe7lo@GeneRex-qe7lo9 ай бұрын
  • The fact that high dimensional spaces are unlikely to have local optima just reminds me of Pólya's random walk theorem.

    @link-89@link-89 Жыл бұрын
  • The overall outcome would be exciting of when this goes final and applicable as a worldwide platform for learning and everything else. For now it's too EARLY to tell.

    @FajWasNotFound@FajWasNotFound Жыл бұрын
  • 2:50:30 Does that mean we could play the natural role of the AI's Brain stem, where we are not as conscious as the AI but the AI still works to understand and aid us?

    @hill2750@hill275011 ай бұрын
  • (Removed; Unfair. Did not watch the whole presentation.) In any case: Great presentation so far, and huge technological respect for everyone involved in the ChatGPT project. Fascinating stuff.

    @Wesker-mr3go@Wesker-mr3go10 ай бұрын
  • So fascinating! I guess one major difference between the way the human brain and GPT handle language is that human brains use emotions to categorize objects and concepts… I wonder if it would be possible to teach GPT emotions, and what might be the result?

    @stehlampe1207@stehlampe120710 ай бұрын
    • It doesn’t even know what it is saying, it just predicts the next word. So I’d say the biggest diFference would be knowing what you want to say instead of just guessing the next word on probability…

      @marcbaxter5996@marcbaxter599610 ай бұрын
  • New Drinking Game: Everytime Mr. Wolfram says "Umm" take a drink!

    @steemglobal8011@steemglobal8011 Жыл бұрын
  • The thing I like about ChatGPT is, you can tell it some information and then ask a question and it can get it wrong, but you can then say, no you got it wrong. But if you figure out its break in logic and explain to it why it got it wrong and what assumptions it made that was wrong, and correct that, it learns. Do that enough times and you can break down any concept, no matter how nuanced and complicated. I've done this. It works. But I only used ChatGPT for one day and never since. Why? Because it's not capable of any truly new and original thought. It can only spit out what we already know. So if the world thinks lemmings jump off cliffs, then so does ChatGPT. Again, you could dig down into it and ask why it thinks lemmings jump off cliffs and show its assumption are unproven, but that's no better than talking to a human and there are over 8 billion other natural ChatGPTs on this planet which already do that. At that point, I lost interest. It's like a boat without a rudder.

    @aaronmicalowe@aaronmicalowe11 ай бұрын
    • Blacks are always the criminals, poor, in the background, asking questions and subordinate in Hollywood movies. Its an agenda. The China film administration is better than Hollywood. Hollwood really Hates Black on Blacks Love. Black men not allowed to have their own Hair & must be bald headed in every single Hollywood movie.

      @GeneRex-qe7lo@GeneRex-qe7lo9 ай бұрын
  • Very interesting!!! THX

    @onaecO@onaecO Жыл бұрын
  • This video is awesome.

    @PointEndClick@PointEndClick Жыл бұрын
  • 2:57 An episode of Star Trek had aliens that were brains with no bodies.

    @emilywong4601@emilywong460110 ай бұрын
  • Well said👍

    @stevehenry6669@stevehenry6669 Жыл бұрын
  • Good talk

    @mikecarr1552@mikecarr1552 Жыл бұрын
  • Would be nice to see the code structure.

    @sibu-jiba@sibu-jiba11 ай бұрын
  • I have a rule for writing text always choose the word that eliminate the most other words first I am writing a plan i will start this way: my plan is ... If I gone write a essay I will start with: this essay is about ChatGPT...

    @drilldrulus1235@drilldrulus1235 Жыл бұрын
  • I still don’t understand how it’s able to generate a really elegant Boost ::spirit C++ parser, and a compiler/evaluator for a non trivial language I explained to it

    @xl000@xl000 Жыл бұрын
  • Love the content miss your videos

    @bellecummerata439@bellecummerata43911 ай бұрын
KZhead