Is it possible to increase your cars performance with nothing more than a can of black paint? Marty and Moog run a series of experiments to find out.
FB / mightycarmods
Grab mad stickers, tshirts and cool stuff here: www.mightycarmods.com/collecti...
Read More about this episode and discuss in detail on the MCM Forum: forums.mightycarmods.com/showt...
Also something to note around Mighty Car Mods: we are normal guys and are not trained mechanics. We like to make interesting car mods and show you how we've gone about it, but we can't promise that anything we show you will work for your particular car, or that you won't harm yourself, someone else, your car or your warranty doing it. Please be safe, be responsible and unless you know what you're doing, do not fool around with serious machinery just because you've seen us make it look so easy. Talk to a qualified mechanic if you are in any doubt.
Why not test them properly and put them on a car and a dyno? Gotta be more trusty than a hairdryer.
hi baby
fleetwoodsucks Stalker.
9:16 Plain aluminum intercoolers emit colder air than black intercoolers WHEN THE CAR IS MOVING. Since we want cars to move, and colder air is better, your conclusion is most puzzling.
I really do love this channel, so it's with a bit of reservation that I made a video response to this. Ultimately, I do not want to see people painting their intercoolers black for unjustified reasons (Don't do it!). You can check out the video on my channel, if you're interested.
Here's the link: Black Intercoolers - Mythbusting Mighty Car Mods
Engineering Explained I watched your vid and then came here via your link. I don't think they did anything wrong, but they're interpreting the results in an incorrect way. They hinted at it in the end but seemed to come to the conclusion to paint all of them, regardless of application. In drag racing, I think this would be perfect (as stated in this vid). However, based on your vid and the info I learned here, painting one in any car that's not drag racing would be a mistake as air is constantly flowing over it when it's being used so the -3% difference is significant.
Dani2wheels Yep, I agree. I think the test was great, and the data good, but ultimately the wrong conclusion achieved. I still would disagree on the drag car scenario. Once the drag car is moving (at all), it's getting less cooling via radiation, which at 50 mph (a low speed) the amount of convection is incredibly significant. As the car reaches higher speeds, the temp drop becomes even more significant with more convection. The small amount of radiation the intercooler gives off (and assuming there are no heat sources radiating heat onto the intercooler - the sun, exhaust manifold, turbo, etc.) will be super insignificant in comparison to the amount of heat an intercooler can disperse via convection at 100+ mph.
Engineering Explained As far as drag racing, I think you'd just have to run some tests and gather much more info. The question is: will the increased cooling while stationary offset the 3% loss at speed? And, is it even -3% at speed? It could be an exponential loss as speed increases because aerodynamic drag increases exponentially which could cause friction and heat on the paint to make it far more than -3% over unpainted. It's definitely curious test results that MCM have gotten, though, but it begs more testing if you're serious about performance. And, like you, I wouldn't recommend anyone short of an F1 team to seriously consider painting an intercooler.
Engineering Explained I also agree with your video. Including the heat transfer coefficient will only proof, that it would in fact transfer heat through the material slower, than a cooler without paint.
But radiators are only meant to reduce heat via convection. That is why engines in moving cars with airflow are cooler than engines in sitting traffic. That is also why there are fans on radiators. The black radiator actually performed worst in the fan scenario, which is the scenario that all cars actively employ. Which means: If you have a radiator to just sit there, paint it black; If you have a radiator in a windy environment (like a car), keep it silver.
Great response!
Engineering Explained, a very nice and educational car channel, shows why this is total BS.
He tore the theory apart so gracefully xD
That dude needs to get like 20 hrs of sleep asap!! His eyes were purple as fuck!! Lol
Engineers don't sleep.
Hahahahaha i was thinking the same thing
from how different the colour is i think he should get a blood test for liver health.
Maybe he's just high as fuck.
88djdmepfdnkjf94 Werent you listening ? Darker is better, faster, more efficient !
Love your channel. And I applaud this scientific testing. But I think you have flawed results. The painted intercooler is covered in fresh paint. And that paint is still evaporating it's solvents. So it is not just giving off heat by radiation. It is also evaporating, (just like if you had used a water spray) and of course there is some airflow due to convection. Given enough time to cure, a week, a month... the advantage of the fresh paint will disappear. And the 3% gap seen with airflow will likely widen due to the insulation effect of the paint. A better test would be 2 identical intercoolers from the same factory, one bright shiny chrome on the outside, one anodized black.
+Brad Rex You worded it better than me. It's only logical that a painted cooler will work less well than a raw one.
Marty's opinion aside, painting it black at least makes it look cooler even if it doesn't actually make it cooler.
I always thought people did that to make it "stealthy" Because a lot of people can see a big shiny intercooler from far away.
Loved this video. One thing i wanted to see, would be them testing it on a car to see if they feel the power change. Can't wait for the next ep :)
Still own that sz supra? msg me ,interested buyer
They would only be able to do it at a drag strip and only "feel" the difference which could be hard when they know they should. If they go to a dyno they will use a fan and then there is only a 0,008% gain. (373,15K/370,15K). Even at a standstill there is still only 13% (350,15K/311,15K) difference with quickly becomes 0,008%. It probably won't feel faster but it might save some wear and tare on the components of the engine.
No, it wouldn't have made a difference, with air flow (ie. dyno or pull on street or drag) there's very little difference - they proved that. The thing is, when you're at the drag strip all staged up (idling) at a 95*F day and you're waiting for the other person to stage up, your intercooler is pissing that heat out of there like nobody's business, so you'll have more power out of the hole for sure. Though once you're moving pretty good (airflow) it won't make as much. So a dyno result won't show much, but it's obviously what you want.
MrSlowestD16 not true as your turbo is not creating pressurised air while you are idling. your temps post turbo but pre intercooler would not be hot at all
hey guys brenny heaaar
An intercooler works through convection not radiation. they seem to be ignoring the results from having air passing through the intercooler. However that's what they should really be concentrating on as the vehicle that the intercooler is fitted to is designed to be moving.
Paint is an insulator. The results you see are purely down to the paint drying (drawing out heat) . Do the same test after a few weeks when paint is fully cured and you will see why this is a bad idea.
Hmm. Good point.
You should dino a car with a silver intercooler and then change it for the same black painted one. Just so we can see if there is a HP difference and a valid reason to spray it black.
You could learn to spell dyno....
SpazN16 Oops! Sorry :P Typo xD
With most things related to a car, this may not actually turn out to be a tangible effect, however it should prolong the life of your turbo with better cooling and theoretically, a colder turbo should mean it spools faster, but there are some many other variables in a car that it probably won't show us much of a difference.
Ian Meiksins I see what you mean. Would be good to have it mythbusted though :D
That theory doesn't make sense... The IC is after the turbo, so painting the IC black will have no effect upon the turbo... It will push the same amount of air with a painted or un-painted intercooler....
If you live in LA a black intercooler is ideal. try sitting on the 405 at 5:30pm.
get a motorcycle and lane split it will cut your commute by like 2 hours haha legal only in CA!
Cant beat the comfort of a car!
Yea because you are totally boosting wile sitting in a traffic jam..... Black radiator would help much more.
Jeez my wrx reached 190f in LA traffic. I got off and drove on the street instead.
Zcypot Thats not really that hot. For my Chevy, 210f is right in the middle of the gauge.
If painting the intercooler black did anything, I would think that it would make less power since black colors absorb heat as opposed to reflecting it? So black would only really be wanted if you're going for more of a stealth look instead of a nice shiny intercooler. :)
This is exactly what that just tested.
+jeepmanxj I know that, I was just stating my hypothesis. At the end of the video they stated that black was actually better which surprised me.
Black absorbs solar heat more than any other color, but the intercooler isn't going to be mounted in direct sunlight so its solar radiation heatsoak vs. the larger cooling area benefit is going to be negligible. Lol
Proved you wrong son! :D
actually that black gets hotter is not true, only a myth that has been busted, on the other hand the paint in itself obserbe heat better then the bere metal so there is maybe a minor difference but not so big difference that the engine would notice.
Engineering Explained - Mythbusting Mighty Car Mods. An Engineer who understands science talking about why they are wrong. MCM - Two guys who have mechanic friends talk about what they think. Yeah I'll go with the engineer, as an engineer myself.
This video is 7 years old and is still entertaining.
Plus: if you have a *_BLAAAAACK_* intercooler (plus *_BLAAAAACK_* piping) means that you get a lot less attention from Australia's fine authorities.
Watching this before Engineering Explained video.
he literally says "the amount of heat lost to radiation is probably insignificant compared to the amount of heat that's lost to convection with the air flowing through it." @10:54 His point being when you're sitting still, there's no airflow, so no convection just radiation, so the black paint DOES make a difference. EXCEPT that your intercooler probably has a fan on it, to make sure there IS air flow, because it IS reliant on convection, radiation is in his own words "probably insignificant."
Yes, the paint made the the intercooler a better radiator and a worse convector, great if the application involves mostly radiation, but in the real world of moving air it performed worse overall because of the insulation.
The amount of heat gained from radiation is a significant factor as well. In a garage the intercooler is not receiving much heat. Close to a hot. engine and blazing hot turbo charger and emissivity is working against you. Emissivity is a 2 way street. Good at sending means good at receiving. This is a great show, but here they were not correct. If you really want a black intercooler, get one anodized.
how the fuck are you going to be building boost/heat while stopped in traffic... the entire point of it is to work while moving, not stationary.
Anodizing an IC any color will make it perform better than the stock bare aluminum. This is because the anodizing has a slightly rough surface which provides more surface area to dissipate heat. However, painting an IC black will insulate the IC because it makes it smoother which will decrease its efficiency when air is moving over it. When they had air flowing through them, the shiny had a 100deg difference where the black had 97deg. That right there is the paint insulating the IC and where anodizing would out perform. In terms of when there is no air flowing through, anodized and painted should have a similar efficiency based on emmisive properties when painted black, however, the anodizing will still have the extra surface area to dissipate heat along with the emissive properties (taking the lead over paint). Basically what im trying to say here, is spend the money to get it anodized (maybe 100$) and have the double benefit of more surface area and the black emmisive properties so you gain when in stale air and when moving. If you cant anodize it, it had better be painted black because all other lighter colors don't have the same emissive properties. Id like to see MCM anodize an IC black and see what results they get
Well you cant realy blame Marty and Moog for the shitty conclusion. Electrinical stig is the one who screwed the test by saying that intercooler works with thermal radiaton. The guy is suposed to be smart afterall he is a mechatronic.
Intercoolers works by convection, not radiation. You are having a 3% efficiency loss by painting it black. Period.
Correct. Painting Black is bad news. Especially if it’s exposed to the sun
@@BespokePowerhouse The sun is 93 Million miles away, how about the flaming hot turbo, or the engine block? You want your intercoolers and radiators shiny and reflective. Bounce that heat away.
Heat soaked... Custom software... I fucking love this channel.
***** it appears he's got an arduino monitoring all this, so it actually would take some custom software to interface it with matlab.
***** Matlab is an evil thing conjured by only the darkest of souls.
i declare an invalid test. should have had an opposite color test. spray one white and try it.
Mcm paint one white and even blue or red to see if its color or just paint itself!!! Plz and ty
Yes MCM must try other colours and even try etch primer on its own!
Shooting it white would have the same effect as leaving it bare.
yes and they need to look into different painting techniques as well (anodized, powder coat, professionally sprayed, straight black onto metal, brush paint, high heat paint, baked on paint, metallic paint, etc. etc.) I would love to see what black paint with flecks of cooper or aluminum in it would do to heat conduction
Wow, that's a completely valid point. I didn't think about and I've got two engineering degrees so I owe you a pitcher of beer and MCM should really consider redoing the test!
I wonder what kind of difference would be made if, instead of using paint, the intercooler was anodised and dyed black during this process. In theory, by having the black _in_ the aluminium instead of as a coating _on_ the aluminium, you should be able to achieve the higher temperature differential of the black unit without any insulating effect.
White blocks heat transfer and black increases heat transfer = Undisputable law. But a coating of paint reduces the heat transfer. However anodizing becomes a component of the aluminum and stabilizes and makes aluminum more durable. And black anodizing is available.
Marty and Moog, your conclusion should have been: Don't paint your intercooler, or radiator for that matter, but add a small electric fan to it for when you are in traffic or at the drags. much simpler than painting it. The paint made the intercooler 3% worse with air moving over it. cheers fellas
They have an episode where they make a system to squirt cold water onto the intercooler.
Aren't black aluminum intercoolers Anodized?
Emissivity is a 2 way street. The ability to emit heat via radiation is always equal to the ability to absorb heat. A radiator or intercooler in an engine bay emitting heat via radiation can just as easily receive heat from the engine, turbo, or other radiators. The heat it radiates may be reflected back by metal body panels and structural components, or may simply heat those up. In the test in the video, the intercooler is not close to a hot engine, radiator AC radiator, or oil cooler. In the test in this video the black intercooler is 3% less efficient than the silver with airflow, even with all those hot components around it. We are all free to paint the radiators and intercoolers of our cars black. Heck, pull your refrigerator away from the wall, and spray it's radiator black, then hit the out door AC unit of your home. But you'll find efficiency drops, rather than improves.
since when radiator of a refrigerator is something other than black? they work with both natural convection and radiation. Your understanding is unrelevant. And your example. You can see efficiency gains because convection is better than radiation in MOST cases. Even a smallest wind can make you dumb.
@@sametbayboru8965 Most refrigerator radiator are unpainted silver/grey. The little college ones with an exposed radiator in the back are painted black because they will be handled and oils from fingers are bad for the finish. So are most air conditioners, car radiators, intercoolers, oil coolers, etc etc. Silver/grey. I'd post some photos, but extreme losers will then tag the photos as spam and the post disappears. Loosers....
What you're seeing is three dudes who don't know the difference between radiative and convective heat loss. The intercooler is a radiator, so relies entirely on airflow through it to cool it. Painting it black just creates a slightly less conductive coating on the surface which makes it less efficient.
+Cardinal Biggles: "What you're seeing is three dudes who don't know the difference between radiative and convective heat loss. The intercooler is a radiator ..." Lol, apparently you don't either, the intercooler is *not* a radiator. (Although it is also wrongly called that in common language like your water cooling radiator which is also a convector, not a radiator)
Technically speaking it is a radiator - without airflow it will still radiate heat - it's just not a very effective one.
Scientifically speaking it is also a radiator, just like every other part of a car, but calling it a radiator because of that is just meaningless. Do you call the mirrors radiators as well? Technically speaking - that is, in its designed mode of operation - the intercooler sheds 95% to 100% of the heat through convection, ergo, it should be called a convector.
Absolutely the wrong conclusion. They were so focused on the huge change with no airflow that they ignored the FACT that the bare aluminum one performed better by 3% with airflow. When do you need your intercooler to perform better - when you're at a stoplight and the turbo isn't providing any boost, or when you're moving and the turbo is boosting and adding heat? If you care at all about its efficiency without airflow you understand nothing about boosted engines. 3% better heat absorption can mean the difference between detonation or not.
The black paint does, however, effectively reduce the temperatures gained through heat soak at a standstill, which can be a problem for many cars
If you're considering the *Difference* between the air temperatures in and out of the intercoolers, then doesn't that means that the higher it is, the better? Therefore without airflow, the black wins (due to emissivity) but with airflow the non-painted one wins, due to convection. and since the vehicle will typically be in motion, painting it black will be disadvantageous just sayn...
The one with paint won because of wet paint. Not because of emissivity. Evaportation is great and is why many systems sprits the intercooler with water.
Really? Looking for performance differences between two colors? Now I'm a fan of MCM, watched turbos and temples like 20 times, watched every episode, so don't take me as a hater when I say this is just low quality for the channel. Ok, I got it, you are building an awesome project car, but make us wait for so long to have a tutorial on how to apply stickers and this, is just low for the MCM I love. Hope next videos are more entertaining. ..
They just got back from america plus they have real job's and this stuff doesn't pay for it self.
A real MCM fan would be patient and enjoy what was released to be a 'tie over' episode. They only put it out so that they weren't inactive for too long. They have lives outside of MCM. Try to be less selfish and be happy that they are currently tackling a project bigger than they ever have for YOU and the other (perhaps truer?) MCM fans.
The LoudAssasin Dude, MCM gets LOTS of money just from youtube revenue...!
I like their Mythbusters-esque episodes.
That guy needs some sleep
You must have mixed up something there with the calculation of the deltas...
There's your first problem.... A mechatronics engineer. If you want something done correctly, ask a mechanical engineer (y)
great show, cheers fellas!
hey paul
PAUL TOKIN
honestly paul i would of never thought you would watch these people. thats fucking great
fuckin paul tokin! yo!
whats good paul!?
I guess the paint didnt fully dry (if you wait a couple days or maybe weeks) . Because of that some of the paint would evaporate and take a little bit of heat with it. Im not sure tho...
This just in, MCM can you please test the following performance difference, a car with and without wheels. Whilst the car isn't driving, say at traffic lights or in my garage, the one without wheels will have a lower weight, and therefore will race faster. Right?
+James Hillyer
Marty : "I have a cable tie" ROFL :))))
MATLAB is the furthest thing from custom. Any engineer at any university has nightmares and wet dreams about it.
haha yes, indeed
I Lold at the mentioning of MATLAB
I'm thinking the conclusion should be to add a fan to the intercooler that comes on when the airflow drops below a threshold.
Black painting of intercooler/ radiators etc is done purely for looks. It will in fact reduce the efficiency of intercooler/ heat exchanger. As it did by 3% in your case. Love your videos btw.
Black paint sales just went up 30% over night xD
Would the 3c difference from the cooling fan perhaps be due to the extra layer over the intercooler from the paint? Great ep!
Or maybe the battery they used had drained just a little bit, 3° over 100° is fairly insignificant anyway.
3 degrees is insignificant
Keven Harvey Exactly what I was thinking
yup. exactly. read my comment for more details :P
You also have to consider the test environment. They have a room space that is not at a constant temp. If it's an open garage for example, you may also have a slight breeze that will influence the result. Typically with data analysis you are looking at large trends and significant differences. Now to know what's significant, you need to run several tests and understand the sense of scale.
So when you're not moving (no air flow) you can go faster?
This mod was used on my Ford Escort RS turbo in the late 80's AND YES IT WORKS TURBO systems motorsport who were one of the UK's top ford tuners in the day and Colins performance both recomended this mod and its cheap easy to do and works.! Also adding a deflector plate helps to by diverting more cold air to it! "Forget the doubters this is real" ( If there are any april fools here its the people who didnt paint theirs! lmao.) !
It might be 8 years later but it seems you guys were correct in your conclusions. What has been falsely banded about here and via Engineering Explained is that intercoolers and on the same principals, radiators, work via convection only. This assumption is flawed and incomplete. They lose heat via both modes. However as air flow is introduced the convection component of the total heat loss of the system increases for both the painted and unpainted coolers in relation to their radiant heat loss component and so the insulating effect of the paint marginally decreases the system efficiency (97%). At the same time the converse is also true in that with zero flow (static) air the radiant component of the total heat loss increases by which you demonstrated the black painted one had a significant improvement over the shiny bare Al one. If intercoolers and radiators worked via convection only, every working ICE powered vehicle on earth would have massive over heating issues. That radiant element of total heat loss can be felt by simply putting your hand near a rad or intercooler while the vehicle is at rest. Exalting thermodynamic principals to a religious level like holy scripture is folly even more so when rudamentary flaws in basic assumptions are made by those who Explain Engineering and claim to 'know better'. At the very least an apology is due to you guys from you know who :)
Lol Your mythbust was mythbusted by EE
The next time I try for full boost while sitting in one spot with no airflow I will try black. In reality the car is moving forward under boost and the IC is better at heat transfer without the paint.
my only question is how can you come to the conclusion that radiation is more prevalent than convection when convection produced better cooling results in both cases?
Radiation doesn't depend on fluid movement for cooling. Essentially, radiation uses the characteristics of light (EM properties), whereas convection uses the fluid interacting with the heat source (air moving past the radiator).
right, and a car radiator (despite its epic misnomer) doesn't dissipate the majority of its energy through Radiation and so trying to focus your efforts on improving its radiation while hindering its convection is really dumb.
oh I agree, but it would explain the results.
thermostats in cooling systems regulate temperature but just as importantly the flow rate of coolant through the radiator as it needs to be slowed down to allow the heat transfer to take place.if the coolant flows too fast (ie. if you thought removing the thermostat would help your overheating issue) the coolant passes through the radiator too fast and back into the heat of the engine thus not cooling your medium efficiently and ending up with over heating. basically you cant keep your charge air in an intercooler long enough for this whole idea to be effective so as it goes the r and d of the big car performance brands is probably why what we have is about as good as were capable of at the current time!
5:05 he says "painting it black changes emissivity and that has nothing to do with airflow".. but an intercooler literally works by cooling flowing air :/
He is talking about the air flowing across the intercooler not the air flowing through it. He is saying that air flowing across the intercooler or not flowing across it has nothing to do with difference of the amount of radiation that can be released because of the color change.
Yeah and the result was that it was 3 degrees less efficient but they completely ignored that. The point is the emissivity doesn't matter because the intercooler's job is to cool the air that's flowing through it. They did the test and the black one was clearly less efficient.
@@chubzdon1 emissivity does matter. If your intercooler is near a hot engine or worse a turbo, you want it bright, shiny and reflecting away radiant heat. IF YOU ARE COOLING A HAIRDRYER IN A GARGE, BLACK IS GOOD!
best thing to test would be take a stock intercooler.. install it on a car and put in on a dyno than spray it black and put it on the dyno again..
What happens when the intercooler is sitting next to something hot though - like a radiator or AC rad for instance? Would love to see what happens on a dyno.
Exactly, we need to test for this as I assume the black intercooler would absorb more ambient heat
A dyno can't simulate the actual situation that there would be an actual benefit of the black paint as the car is mostly indoors and with a huge fan blowing air regardless of the car speed. Moreover running cooler wouldn't produce more HP. You would need a new tune to benefit from the engine's improved tolerance.
do some rearranging
n00b1n4t0r The fan on a dyno can be turned off to simulate sitting in traffic so it would be a decent test. Also every turbo car I have heard of in the last 15+ years has knock sensors. They adjust timing according to when detonation starts (well it goes off a count of how many det's occur). Basically if the intercooler keeps things cooler the ecu can feed in more fuel and advance the timing more. It will definitely make more power.
Loving the mythbusting episodes, really getting down the the science and shizuoka behind parts and stuff. Keep it up guys, fantastic.
After cleaning dye from a flashlight where aluminum plate with soldered led touches anodized aluminum I got flashlight getting much warmer than before. I used pipe cleaner with powerful alkali. After pure aluminum was exposed added thermal paste and got a good thermal spread. Even anodized aluminum in my flashlight was bad for thermal resistance.
I have some questions. First what about other colors. Does the color matter? Second, how long after you painted, did you do the test? You might have had volatiles left in the paint which throw off the test. Evaporating paint emissions could also effect heat transfer.
how a difference of 97 degrees (black) is better than a difference of 100 degrees(no painted)??
Years ago my friends and I did a simular test with two identical IC's but we powder coated one instead of paint. The powder coat was a plain powder no ceramics and was black in color. From what we found the powder coated IC had a hotter discharge temp being almost 40 degrees hotter then the non powder coated IC. There's obviously a big difference between spray paint and powder coatings and the PC seemed to actually prevent the dissipation of heat throught the IC. Not sure if ceramic PC would have the same effect or not. Good to know that regular black spray paint actually helps. After our tests we kinda assumed paint would have the same effect as PC but just not as much.
I actually work at s powder coating shop ... This is something I must ask my boss on whether ceramic coating or powder coating work better to cool down metals ..
I actually work at s powder coating shop ... This is something I must ask my boss on whether ceramic coating or powder coating work better to cool down metals ..
the reason why you paint the radiator black is to even out the heat distribution. if they ever do this agian. i think a Infrared camra would be great addition to the test instead of just sensors.
Subaru Liberty lurking at 11:42 :P
I've been waiting for a update on the 11sec gramps
What were the ambient temperatures during each phase of the test?
Thanks for the experiment, what happened is the black absorbed the heat energy in the air at higher rate hence the greater delta Temp "getting heat soaked faster", and it would heat soak way faster than the reflective aluminum. Thanks again for testing
There is a product from thermotec it’s designed to be a header wrap coating but it works well on metal, I’d be interested to see a test with the copper paint
Very entertaining! I love a garage test lab as much as the next man. But seriously? The only thing that would convince me would be a dyno run before and after paint. So once I've fitted the intercooler to my bike, I'm leaving it yellow...
DERP, with the fan (convection) it cooled worse... These aren't designed for emissive cooling via radiation...
So as long as your intercooler is not exposed to sunlight, and does not have any air flow over it, black is better. However the test showed a decreased capacity with airflow, likely due to the extra layer from the paint. So if your car actually moves through the air, you're better off not painting it.
Good thing they only drive in space with their space unicorn power.
The intercooler is designed to transfer heat to air moving through the fins, it needs airflow in order to deal with much more heat produced by a turbocharger, not the tiny hair dryer.The result of no airflow just proved the intercooler with black paint had more mass and it could absorb more heat.
I painted my intercooler black because I don't want people to see it. Any performance gained or lost from painting it is negligible.
Hows adding a insulating layer of paint help lol
Its not the color at all but the top layer emissivity that effects the heat loss by radiation. If you look into it, different materials have different emissivity levels. This means that alumininium or chrome for instance has a very low emissivity value. Paint the aluminium though and NOT because of the color change but because of the top layer emissivity, heat radiation changes. Try it out: heat a chrome bar and hold your hand near it to try and feel the radiation. Now apply tape or something more heat resistent (paint...) all over the surface and redo. There will be a noticeable difference in radiation because the top layer emissivity changed. As a thermographer, I know.
So what was actual difference with airflow ?
Wrong - because John Cadogan.
yes.. John Cadogan, is the right answer. - but lets make intercoolers of solid gold, then I think the cooling would be better.. alot better !
Cadogan covered this when he mentioned copper. The same logic applies to gold; Cost. (Along with weight and malleability of course.)
So they conclude that the black is better dispite the alloy one actually cooling the air better when doing the test it was designed to do? Or have I got that wrong
+stephen reed You are spot on. They think because black wins standing still, it's best. But a car does not stand still! IN those circumstances, black loses. They proved it, but still Electronical Stig made the wrong conclusion. Funny!
+stephen reed Could you guys elaborate?
It loses because intercoolers work through direct conduction to the cool air blowing past the exterior surface, not the piddly amount of radiative cooling you might get with a different color paint. Paint acts as an insulator and reduces the efficiency of the bare aluminum metal's excellent thermal conduction. Even if the car is sitting still, that tiny amount of extra radiative cooling will not benefit you once a significant mass of hot compressed air starts flowing through that intercooler, and the insulating paint will only slow down that heat from getting to the outside surface of the fins to be conducted away by ambient air.
I remember seeing and option for the old SRT4 Neons and it incorporated water nozzles mounted in front of the factory front mount intercooler that would spray a fine mist of water all over the front of the intercooler to cool them off after getting heart soaked. Anyone remember those, I heard it worked well to cool of the intercoolers.
Robert Daone bit late but yea I’ve seen a lot of Subaru’s that people have set those up on especially track cars in hot climates
Are you calling them mechanical and electronic stig? In which case Some say he doesn't install front mount intercoolers because he thinks it will scare away his prey, gophers. And that his left collar bone is shaped exactly like a roll cage, all we know is he's called mechanical stig.
Everybody knows that only painting the body makes cars faster, and it works better if you're painting stripes, not the whole thing.
+Jenny Tokumei and also everyone should know red ones go faster.
Sneatz. Especially if you put finish flag checker pattern on it like in these examples: seitz.us/syracuse_drag_z28_back.jpg orig14.deviantart.net/d27a/f/2008/056/7/0/ork_fighta_bommer_by_snowfyre.jpg etc... Finish flag checker paint with red means not only are you the fastest, but also it means you've already won.
gotta put flames the add 10hp
Can't deny the science here. Your own experiment proves that black paint on an inter cooler is less efficient that with plain aluminum during air movement. Ever notice that the transmission cooler located at the bottom of the radiator is painted black? And that the top of the radiator is painted black? Probably to prevent rust during rain/water splash. But think about this. An aftermarket transmission cooler placed in front of the radiator cools far better than in the stock radiator. Why? Airflow.
Only slight less so. And by using much less energy by going completely fanless, just painting it black results in much better performance. I'd say that's a clear win by far for performance-to-weight ratio.
Jason Alexander well the fact that you're cars rad is already trying to keep your engine coolant cold is a big factor also.
Air flow is a big part, but equally significant is the fact that the fluid cooling through a dedicated cooler is not impeded by the temp of the coolant circulating through the radiator core! The fluid temp can only drop as low as the radiators overall temp.
So, do this experiment again and change your input volume to more, hotter flow to simulate a non-idle scenario (say, in a CAR) to see if it is still only 3%. I find it silly that you are doing this test with a hair dryer at a super low volume of flow.
+Kevin Wimberly Agreed
I'd bet that they didn't wait for the paint to properly cure and during the first heat test without airflow the paint cured and offgassed, causing it to shed heat faster. This also points to why it made a negligible difference under airflow since the paint had cured.
My Volvo S60R has two intercoolers...one black and one silver, I guess those crazy Swedes were hedging their bets!
John O u sure the black one isn't a oil cooler?
SpeedTech Inc. Positive! The oil cooler is attached to the back of the block. And the trans cooler is in the radiator. When volvo built the S60R they doubled the boost pressure of the S60 and instead of a completely new intercooler, they added a smaller secondary one thats plumbed into the big one.
I have an 04 S60r. I can confirm the validity of the two different intercoolers. It wasn't a great setup.
Travis Montgomery. Did you upgrade your intercooler? It was probably fine for a cold climate like Sweden, but down here in Australia it's not that effective.
John O car is all stock as of yet. Stock dual intercoolers on the Volvo's was a complicated fix for the temperatures the R and T5s create. My stock Volvo runs 1.06 bar. More than capable of overwhelming the stock cooler with vigorous driving.
I would have thought that it would be worse because the paint serves as a thermal barrier sort of, since it is a much worse conductor of heat compared to the steel.
The paint is a thermal barrier, but while wet, it is evaporating. And as tested here, the paint is still wet. This is a false result they have.
@@TexMex421 ahh, that makes sense.
@@jort93z I love these guys, but here they screwed up. Paint takes a long time to dry completely a month easy. They mention letting it dry, but not how long, and they even mention "getting as much paint into the fins as possible". My guess is they let it wait a few hours the outside felt dry and the inside was still quite wet. This is why people have those water spritzer systems for their intercoolers.
Usually matte drys faster and heat soaking it would have a further ‘baking’ effect therefore the paint would be dry prior to testing.
Emissivity is a 2 way street. The ability to emit heat via radiation is always equal to the ability to absorb heat. A radiator or intercooler in an engine bay emitting heat via radiation can just as easily receive heat from the engine, turbo, or other radiators. The heat it radiates may be reflected back by metal body panels and structural components, or may simply heat those up. In the test in the video, the intercooler is not close to a hot engine, radiator AC radiator, or oil cooler. In the test in this video the black intercooler is 3% less efficient than the silver with airflow, even with all those hot components around it. We are all free to paint the radiators and intercoolers of our cars black. Heck, pull your refrigerator away from the wall, and spray it's radiator black, then hit the out door AC unit of your home. But you'll find efficiency drops, rather than improves.
but wouldn't black intercoolers be anodized? in which case the coating would not affect the aluminum temperature characteristics?
@Nybbl er Anodizing is not a coating, it's created by oxidizing the surface of aluminium. which can be dyed to any colour. Anodizing actually significantly improves the performance of electronic heat sinks by significantly increasing the surface emissivity from around .05 for bare aluminium to 0.85 The colour makes no measurable difference
Anodizing would be better than painting. But if the intercooler is in a car near a hot engine, tube and radiator, you want low emissivity, silver. For cooling hair dryers in a garage, paint works great.
i think if you consider that behind the intercooler would be a hot engine, then the black maybe will absorb that heat and will make it less efficient, also the paint is an extra layer of insulation, by its own and stationary it is better but in the car i am not so sure. My thought is to have the front side black (maybe not so good if direct sunlight hits it but does the job) and the side close to the engine heat a reflective silver
or you can make the zebra-cooler. Both worlds combined, it is the unicorns mate
black doesn't absorb heat, it only absorbs LIGHT heat.
Huh? Why don't you speak with proper terminology? Convection and radiation. Black does indeed absorb radiative heat, which a hot engine would definitely be emitting, depending on its outer coating. It should either be polished to a mirror surface or coated with another metal to behave as such.
im pretty sure black absorbs light energy and not actual heat itself...
Yeah, a hybrid radiator. =)
Matlab!? Never thought I'd see someone use that outside of research. /Studying Electrical Engineering.
To this day, the tech geek still hasn’t slept.
He's on the shabz
Moog's hat fits amazingly on his head
Is it possible that because the amount of light in the room changed from one test to the other test, heat dissipated more.
Maybe time to revisit this??? More science? Maybe cheap ebay vs expensive?
that guy looks like he has not slept in about 400 years.
Part of the small difference between bare and black (with air flow) might be the layers of paint impeding air flow by reducing the distance between the cooling fins. I would think that if the inter-cooler was black anodized, instead of being painted, the difference would be greater. Also, the interior of the inter-cooler still being bare, when just being painted, is a factor too. An inter-cooler of black anodized aluminum (black inside & out) might show completely different results for the better. JMO. I'm surprised that you guys didn't do a dyno test too. That's what really might show whether it's worth it. Also, JMO.
Well ,dark paint attract sun more than light colors. So in sun Dark would heat up more than light.
Yea I figure painting it white would be better but it is under the hood/bumper of a car so sunlight isnt really the main issue
Also radiates more heat to be taken from the wind of your awesome BLACK intercooler.
not when under a bonnet or bumper ive dynoed my car with it normal and black and the difference is nearly 20hp as black radiates heat
You guys should read up on ‘confirmation bias’. You so wanted it to work you called the test with airflow (you know the one like how a car operates) showed a negligible improvement, NO, it made it worse, sorry guys, great idea, good test, screwed up the conclusion.
9:01 from 100°C to 97°C temperature difference is not a negligible improvement, it is a small worsening. And with higher windspeeds, which are likely to occur in real circumstances, the worsening will be even greater. So your conclusion of does no harm is plain wrong.
Did you just say "small worsening"? ... and then the "worsening" would be even greater? How about small disadvantage? I would like to point out they said the disadvantages are outweighed by the benefits when sitting still. Also, you're missing the point. They clearly say that there would be an advantage IN traffic and AT the drag strip. Basically painting it black would help prevent the intercooler from becoming overly heat soaked so when you hit the gas once traffic clears or the Christmas tree turns green you could get some cooler air than if it wasn't painted. Furthermore. 3* isn't really a huge deal when it comes to intake temperature however, when you're sitting at a stop a difference of over 40* is a HUGE difference.
+Dan W First, it will be more than 3° because normally you drive faster than this fan blows. Second, when standing still, your turbo isn't really working that much so you won't "heatsoak" your intercooler anyways.
When you are stopped at a stop light the intercooler doesn’t have hot air blowing through it because the turbo isn’t spinning and the exhaust is cooler. It isn’t realistic to think that it will have extremely hot air going through it at a standstill.
So basically painting your intercooler black will make your car much faster when it's not moving :-D By the way when a car is not moving or moving slowly the turbocharger will typically be idling and the intake air will not be hotter than the ambient air (because no turbo pressure).
Stéphane Tréboux it could actually help a lot while stopped. A lot of drag racers with turbocharged cars will sit at high revs to spool up the turbo for it to be effective during their takeoff. It would be very advantageous in a situation like that.
what if you anodized an intercooler black.... it wouldn't insulate at all but would still have the benifits of the blackness and might be more effective
I was thinking this, and I think this may be correct, however the actual importance of radiation compared to the convection and conduction of heat in the intercooler would make that an expensive and very insignificant upgrade.
It's Barney but..... for science?? but seriously I do agree I just want to see it done. the situation I think it would be really good in is stop and go traffic and keep in mind a manufacturer could easily overcome the cost by building a lot of them. so yea I agree it would be dumb for an individual to do but maybe we could convince a good manufacturer to do it if there was evidence (easy advertising) already done to support it
Yeah that would be cool. Maybe also other colours as well! A red intercooler could look mad!
Will adding a blue viper logo (painted on) onto my black big mount intercooler for my srt4 do much to it? It’s already black
FMIC logos add at least an extra 10 wheel HP from my experience
anew742 nice! No I was just wondering if it would change much from being painted multiple colors
@@connerhendrickson8418 Please be trolling, please be trolling, please be trolling...
+1 on the anodizing. That is what i used on my Diesel intercooler. Dropped my intake temps by almost 60 deg in real world use. I just did it to look more discrete, And black looks sick!
Was the intercooler completely dry? Seems like they've done it in the same day and maybe the fresh paint still had some solvent which could steal some of the heat, making the air cooler.