Bobby Fischer vs Mark Taimanov • World Championship Candidates • Canada, 1971
2023 ж. 9 Шіл.
839 505 Рет қаралды
Bobby Fischer vs Mark Taimanov • World Championship Candidates • Canada, 1971
Bobby Fischer vs Mark Taimanov • World Championship Candidates • Canada, 1971
Taimanov was stripped of his stipend by the USSR chess federation after this 'catastrophe.' It was restored when Bent Larsen was beat 6-0 by Fischer in the semi final. Apparently Taimanov was a nice guy, and also a professional concert pianist.
Great, fantastic and immortal Bobby Fischer!!! Respect forever!!! 👍👍👍
There are tough players and nice guys. I'm a tough player." - Bobby Fischer
magnus is a pretty nice guy
Fischer holds the 2 greatest achievments in chess history....winning 12 games IN A ROW against 2 top challengers to play Spassky...and WINNING 20 games in a row!!...against GM's
Top grandmasters: 7 in the Interzonal + 13 in the Candidates matches.
Зэ😊😊😊 1:56 @@tudorm6838
Nadie podrá jamás superará a Bobby. Porque lo hizo solo, sin la ayuda de nadie. Kasparov, karpov, carlsen y otros tuvieron ayuda de grandes entrenadores, incluso de su familia y el gobierno. Bobby ni siquiera su familia ni el gobierno de su país le ayudó. Llegó en taxi a jugar el campeonato del mundo contra la escuela Soviética de ajedrez. Y les ganó a todos. Además ha jugado el ajedrez más perfecto de todos los tiempos. Por estas razones y otras más nadie le llega ni a los talones al gran Bobby. El único que supera a Bobby es el ajedrez mismo. Robert James Fischer: "EL MAS GRANDE".
Sim estou acompanhando as partidas do livro My 60 melhores partidas. Um nível técnico brutal. GM Renato Quintiliano tem canal aqui no KZhead e explica de forma mui didática. Já está na 10 partida. Confere lá.
What about Paul Morphy?
@@raphaelkreutzer8063 Paul Morphy ganaba cuando el ajedrez estaba en pañales. Si Morphy hubiera jugado contra Philidor, o Steinitz, la historia hubiera sido muy distinta.
Usually..we don't move a piece twice in the opening But here Bobby moves his bishop thrice in his 6,7 and 8 th moves!Also a lesson in End game too! Amazing!
P
"exception 2 the rule"
Rules like that are totally useless, because chess is a very concrete game. A move is strong, because the move works very well in the current position. Only this counts. Golden rules belong to trash can.
Fantastic
What a game! 🤩 👏
Very nice. The speed is great. Perhaps you could add which game was this. Maybe a little more information on your posts.
Really enjoy your format
AT LAST! A Chess video that I can follow because it doesn't move too fast. ( I do know that I can slow down the speed of the vtdeo, but i would rather not bother to do that, ) This is nicely presented 'Chess Mate'. 5 seconds per move works for me, I have Subscribed and hit the bell. Thank you for this game. I learn much about Chess from watching the masters. _OA
After they traded Rooks late in the game, there was no way Bobby Fischer was going to lose with that passed pawn.
Fisher’s games are like works of art. I thought I saw one inaccuracy, but I maybe I was wrong.
Why didn’t Fischer fork his rook and king?
that is an interesting way of concieving of art perfect flawlezs
@nahgahnub bishop was attacked, and then Fischer's knight wound eventually be captured after being trapped?
Gracias ❤por presentarnos esta partida y sobretodo la forma tan extraordinaria y adecuada de mover lento y en silencio. Mejor imposible ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️🌹👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
Thank you very much 👏 You are welcome 🙏
His annihilation of the draw-king Petrosian was almost as impressive.
Ninguém jogava um final com maestria igual a Fischer insuperável até hoje.
What a great endgame!
Enjoyed this game quite a bit. Thanks for uploading. Actually predicted rightly on more moves than I would've thought going in.
I thought Taimanov was in serious trouble out of the opening, I wasn't expecting it to take this long
Same...😎
Genio insuperable.
This fight is so legendary
..ooch yessss??.....
@@sugirib.a7302yes.
Bellissimo 😍.
Push notifications bell 🔔 ON, to stay connected with this channel!
Einfach großartig!🎉
I attended that series held at the UBC (University of British Columbia). Many top rated chest players in a packed room including a Canadian Grand Master. On more than one occasion there was a muted, but audible , gasp when Fischer made a particular move!
Fischer sang legenda, dari awal permainan tidak ada tekanan, hanya saling mengancam biasa saja, dan pada akhir permainan berhasil menguasai bidak G-H sehingga raja hitam tdk bisa menyebrang mengingat bidak H1 yg dipertahankan bobby adalah bidak yg tdk fleksibel, dan kuda hitam yg fleksibel pun dibuat tdk berdaya, itu langkah yg sulit sampai akhir permainan, mengingat sejak pertengahan hingga akhir permainan bidak G-H selalu dipertahankan bobby... Love bobby, em your fans ❤
👏👏
TY...SIMPLE AND QUIET....I can hear myself think.
Bobby is advantage for winning!
Bonjour, pkoi à 2min 38, bobi fisher ne fait pas une double fourchette avec son cavlier et le roi opposé pour prendre la tour ???
I stopped watching after 3 minute but I I still loved it
yay~! Fischer!!
Bobby just toying for last 20 min.
Genius on Display before the Computer era.
Pure Genius - which Ai cannot pretend to
Muchas Gracias 😊👍🇨🇱
بالفعل بوبي فيشر أسطورة
It's fun to guess the next move. I didn't get any but it was fun.😂
Your world will slow down about 10 times watching this.
❤
As a great master myself, both players did lots of errors!😂
Bien trop d'erreurs effectivement... J'en ai déjà deux qui aurait permis à Bobby de gagner bien plus tôt du moins prendre un avantage considérable
Can you point out a few so I can learn?
@@tehatteFischer should have created a fork between the black king and rook using his knight, after trading queens :)
@@ravindrasapkota8833 Do you think Fischer didn’t see that? If he didn’t there would be no Fischer in this world. Forking was an option but after white gets the rook black will get the hanging bishop at g5, and then with black, in a couple moves, will get back the white knight that’s trapped in the corner at a8. In the end that would be a trade of a knight+bishop (6 points) for a rook (5 points), a loss for white.
@@tehatte3:52 What would've been wrong about White takes pawn on d6 with the Knight? It seems to cleanly win a pawn, no? Instead Fischer moved pawn f4.
Is it only me, or do more think it strange that both missed capturing pawns when they had opportunities?
Which moves or what time in the clip?
I love to play Chess with the black pieces but, what color did Bobby Fisher preferred? Thanks
🤔If you wonder, how many moves they played... it was 89 moves
Тайманов - молодец! Долго и грамотно держал удар. Но Фишер не спешил, получая удовольствие от шахмат.
Super duper
💖💖💖🙏🙏🙏
אחלה סרטון
Superb..
Thanks 🤗
Fischer!!!!👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏💪💪💪👍👍👍
Gli scacchi be' 🤩
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
Why not play c7+ after the queen exchange?
I like this game ,a jinus brain has FISHER..
Saya penggemarmu bobby, hanya ada dua orang pemain catur yg saya kagumi, yaitu Bobby Fischer dan Anatoly Karpov 👍👍👍👍
They both are great players 👏
So Proper !@@Chess-Mates
El movimiento del alfil es fantastico
Yes
GRANDE B. F.
🥊👍🤗
That was masterful endgame play by Fischer (and Taimanov!) I didn't think there would be any way to queen that h-pawn for white (Fischer). Fischer's bishop didn't even command the queening square. Plus! Fischer had to avoid black sac'ing his knight for the pawn, forcing a drawn, K&B v K endgame.
Should show game number.
El mejor juego!
How won the game
Seguro qui nadie va a superar Fischer. Gano a todos los rusos, spasky, korchnoi polugaievesķy, Keres, Petrossian, y a Portisch, y al mago de Riga, Tal pero mis favoritos son Karpov , Kasparóv Alekhine e Capablanca el genio cubano.
Fischer was the best of the best!
Oh this is how easy it is to get 719k views at the time of writing, if only I knew 😁😁
Good Stuff
Glad you enjoyed
KxBc2 looked liked draw followed by Rg6!
...wrote a nice,appreciating comment few days ago, it's gone; who stole it!?😎...
Can’t stop that “sneaky” pawn!!
Ganhou ou perdeu?
Bishop for the win
2:54 اینجا اگه یک حرکت اسب رو تکون میداد کیش و مات شده بود واسه چی فیلش رو جا به جا کرد؟؟؟
Конечно, он гений своего времени!!! Но он играл так как все. В данной партии Тайманов откровенно слабо провел эндшпиль. А что скажете про Таля??? Никто и никогда не играл в такие шахматы!!!
@2:39 fisher could have went knight to c7 forking the king and rook but instead choose to move his bishop?? Am I the only one seeing that??
Surprise art seen
В матче с Фишером играя вторую партию Тайманов в хорошей позиции, имея лишнюю пешку допустил зевок ладьи, конечно, очень сильно расстроился и в результате проиграл всё партии.
Why didn’t Fischer create a fork between Black king and rook using his knight ( time about 2.52) ?
Because he would lose his Bg5 and his then-trapped Na8 for the rook.
There is no Bishop at g5????????????@@isjawu
🙃👍👍
8😢
All pawns
Taimanov was a pawn up and suddenly he was a pawn down in the end game. How Taimanov's King wandered into enemy territory and never able to come back seems absurd but that's Fischer for you. Taimanov cannot seem to co-ordinate his pieces into meaningful defence in the end game and lost by the h pawn.
Riuscite ad interrompere anche le partite di scacchi con la pubblicità, vergogna!😠
Why didn't black take the pawn on a2 ages ago with the bishop?
Five 60 Lincoln Place
Justeru Tamanov yg agak menekan Bobby menjelang pertengahan permainan, tapi cool player tetap tenang yeaahh 👍😃
не матч, а какой-то позор с непродуманными ходами
2:31 конь c6 и выиграть ладью. Я бы так походил
0:07 0:07 0:07 😮 0:07 😊
Rajan koranpeedika kerala india
Supeer burger😂😅super game
0:07 0:07
✌✌Marinoni Claudio in Milan
At 2:41 why not knight to C7?
Bishop hangs. Then Knight gets traps after it takes rook.
@@jackmckok87always worth scarifing knight for a Rook.
Can someone please explain to me. Why did he not take the Bishop with his king towards the end??
Probably preferred the knight cause its an active piece at this stage of the game and the rook is out of play. I know the rook is worth more, but you can build up a positional advantage with an active knight that gives more value than the material value from trading. Think about why players do an exchange sacrifice, its cause the knight is more active in the middlegame, so they prefer it to the rook. I think more beginner players would just take the rook, and hope to go in to the endgame up in material, and that's fine. If it had been a more endgame or late middlegame position, I think generally the fork would have been made.
I don’t know much about chess, but if you have to move your king that early have you made an error?
Как скучен Фишер..нет идеи, линии занял и отдал, 2 раза по 2 хода, занял позицию и сразу отдает..реально слаб на голову
Jalan terlalu lambat membuat bosan
I don't get why did Taimanov resign? He was going to have a passed pawn. Am I missing something?
Yes you are watching negatives instead of actual film. Taimanov was Black.
Why didn't he fork the king and the rook? ROOKIE!
What's that app they are using for chess ?
22:00: Warum Turmtausch??? Das ist das Ende für Schwarz!😎...
2 schlechte Königszüge von Schwarz und die Partie ist für weiss gewonnen
Bobby Fischer missed taking a free rook at the beginning of the game. It was a blunder. This was not at all a GM level game.
that's what I was wondering about too. After the queen exchange white should've forked the rook
I agree. I thought for sure he 'd use the knight fork at c7.
@@Gary-tm1kxsomeone already mentioned the rook was not free, would end up 1 rook for 2 minor pieces
Wasn't that easy. Black will capture the Bishop at g5 (with the Knight at e4 )then trap the Knight at a8 which has no where to retreat. that would led to 2 piece vs one and unclear.
Too many blunders. I just don’t believe it.
Knight to c4 by taimanov😊