Here's why I don't trade this strategy that made 105.2% in a month
2024 ж. 18 Мам.
3 607 Рет қаралды
✅ Free webinar - elevate your trading using algorithmic strategies ➔ bit.ly/3oaqAsl
✅ My flagship programme (6 strategies, signals, support & community) ➔ bit.ly/3IRGcsi
-----------------
Why would anyone not trade a trading strategy that made 105.2% in a month? In today's video, I show you a technique that I use to assess risk of trading strategies, based on which I decided not to trade this highly profitable strategy
-----------------
Did you enjoy this video? You'll enjoy these too:
➤ Trading Indicators Quantified playlist: bit.ly/3sSJvbh
➤ Algorithmic Trading Series: bit.ly/3pUyy7R
📢 BRAND NEW FREE WEBINAR Elevate your trading using systematic strategies & get a strategy that made 105% in 2020. Sign up for free today ➔ bit.ly/3oaqAsl
Great advice bud!
I'm really looking forward to the programme !
Thanks Mickael!
what language do you use to code , and is it for tradingview or for mt5
Hey this is great! Thank you. Which software are you using for the Monte Carlo Analysis?
Thank you, I use Amibroker
Another great video! I found this strategy traded a whole bucket of stocks at once, so it might hard to do it the semi-automatic way? Should similar strategies be used with fully automated setting when implementing to live?
Hi Raymond, yes it trades all Russell 3000 stocks which is no problem to scan with Amibroker using its exploration function
How to do the Monte Calo simulation? Would please make a vedio about it for details? Thanks a lot.
It's done automatically with each backtest in the software I'm using, i.e. I'm not calculating the numbers myself
Superrrr....
Dou you ever used divergence? When looking at bigger tf ive noticed they are pretty accurate
Not yet but it's on my list to backtest
@@CriticalTrading 👍 great
Using Monte Carlo to shuffle returns is nothing new or original. If you watched x20 videos about algo trading you probably encountered one that's recommending Monte Carlo shuffle. What I'm trying to say, if the advertised course is going to be full of stuff that one can get for free elsewhere, then its not worth paying for.
That’s correct, Monte Carlo is commonly used in algo trading, and I didn’t claim that it’s anything “new or original”. Regarding the course - value is the full codes, signal scanners, support and other things that help beginners progress much quicker than on their own, and that’s definitely worth paying for ;)
What goes up can easily go down. Remember to take profits and don't get FOMO.