Walter Benjamin: The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction

2024 ж. 4 Мам.
176 789 Рет қаралды

An introduction to the art critic Walter Benjamin and his most influential essay, the Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Including David Douglas's the Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction.
Original Score by August Aghast:
'Man Made'
'Servant of Two Masters'
Soundcloud: / augustaghast
Twitter: / augustaghast
Then & Now is FAN-FUNDED! Support me on Patreon and pledge as little as $1 per video: patreon.com/user?u=3517018
Or send me a one-off tip of any amount and help me make more videos:
www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr...
Buy on Amazon through this link to support the channel:
amzn.to/2ykJe6L
Follow me on:
Facebook: fb.me/thethenandnow
Instagram: / thethenandnow
Twitter: / lewlewwaller
Credits:
Stock footage provided by Videvo, downloaded from www.videvo.net
Sources:
Uwe Steiner, Walter Benjamin: An Introduction to his Thought and Work (especially the introduction)
Walter Benjamin, the Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction
David Ferris, The Cambridge Introduction toe Walter Benjamin
David Douglas, The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction

Пікірлер
  • Script & sources at: www.thenandnow.co/2023/05/21/walter-benjamin-the-work-of-art-in-the-age-of-mechanical-reproduction/ ► Sign up for the newsletter to get concise digestible summaries: www.thenandnow.co/the-newsletter/ ► Why Support Then & Now? www.patreon.com/user/about?u=3517018

    @ThenNow@ThenNow9 ай бұрын
  • This is amazing! The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction is a very long and dense article. Your interpretation was super clear :)) it really helped me out

    @mariainesferreirarodrigues9467@mariainesferreirarodrigues94673 жыл бұрын
  • I think that Walter Benjamin would love memes

    @danielzylberkan1587@danielzylberkan15874 жыл бұрын
    • yea same

      @suipig8701@suipig87013 жыл бұрын
    • “A work of art in the age of digital reproduction”

      @spectralv709@spectralv7093 жыл бұрын
    • @@spectralv709 exactly, where authenticity and authorship are completely moot

      @danielzylberkan1587@danielzylberkan15873 жыл бұрын
    • I wrote an essay on this for uni lol

      @cameronetherton8422@cameronetherton84223 жыл бұрын
    • @@cameronetherton8422 yooo you mind sending me that essay lmao

      @rahmyahbegay5475@rahmyahbegay54753 жыл бұрын
  • Great summary. It's a pretty long article. This is very nice and summarised. The stock footage and music and animation really makes Walter Benjamin's article comes alive.

    @cruelangel7737@cruelangel77373 жыл бұрын
  • I am a cemetery monument engraver enthralled with the hand carved memorials of centuries past. I own a private studio, fully equipped with all the modern tools used to carve stone, yet I somehow resist the persuasion to create memorials based on today's "cookie-cutter", commodified philosophy. As a society of craftspeople and artisans, we have more than enough tools needed to creatively express the individuality of a person's last tribute, yet what is lacking is the willingness to embrace the examples left to us by generations of memorialists who have paved the way. I find it rather strange that, centuries ago, people of very meager and modest financial means literally have more elegant memorials, than do the well-to-do of our present age. How and why is this? I long for the answer, and perhaps will find clues in the writings of Walter Benjamin. Thank you for providing this video. I appreciate it greatly.

    @StonesAndSand@StonesAndSand4 жыл бұрын
  • Just discovered the channel and subscribed, never stop spreading knowledge

    @davidsoto1900@davidsoto19005 жыл бұрын
  • Really fantastic video! I studied this at university and didn't really get it. 10 minutes on KZhead and I understand. I was blind and now I can see.

    @georgekazakos4164@georgekazakos41643 жыл бұрын
  • I like that this meditation on Benjamin's essay reveals a bit of his own indebtedness to an understanding of art that was itself of a time and place. Rituals and cults are, in fact, political. What we have then is an entire transformation of our ideological systems across a broad range of such systems. Benjamin's essay is right in sensing that something has changed, is changing, without yet necessarily being able to understand what the ramifications are.

    @JohnLaudun@JohnLaudun5 жыл бұрын
    • I would think that rituals and cults are not necessarily “political” in the same way Benjamin is referring to here, since the political relates to modernity‘s rise of the nation state and the political messaging of mass communication, media, and mobilization.

      @RussellWestcoast@RussellWestcoast2 жыл бұрын
  • Beautifully done!!! It's amazing how alike we think. All these topics are of profound importance and interest to me, but ... I can't find the proper way of communicating them to other people.

    @johnarbuckle2619@johnarbuckle26195 жыл бұрын
  • This was well done. As a hearing impaired person I'd love it if you'd be able to upload subtitles too.

    @AnalysisTherapy@AnalysisTherapy4 жыл бұрын
    • The automatic caption worked for me, I'm hearing impaired too

      @kissiwaa8028@kissiwaa80283 жыл бұрын
  • As someone has already posted: your channel is what The School of Life should be.Keep up the good work!

    @peroz1000@peroz10005 жыл бұрын
    • yes

      @supaduperazn@supaduperazn5 жыл бұрын
    • You know why you say that? It is because he has the same accent. Fascinating how we form our opinions by such subtle means.

      @ObeySilence@ObeySilence4 жыл бұрын
    • You didn't create School of Life. How do you know what is 'should' be? It is what it is. 'Then and Now' is 'Then and Now'.

      @alisonbennett175@alisonbennett1754 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, I agree. I expected continental philosophy from the School of Life. Instead, I got a more sophisticated version of what the self-help books that flood the market right now preach. Then & Now, on the other hand, is highly concentrated continental philosophy. Well, sometimes a bit TOO concentrated lol.

      @cruelangel7737@cruelangel77373 жыл бұрын
    • @@cruelangel7737 Exactly!

      @peroz1000@peroz10003 жыл бұрын
  • Thank U for sharing this great work.

    @ismaelziri5736@ismaelziri57364 жыл бұрын
  • Damn, I'd written a similar paper on the conception / function of art - except that was with regards to the digital / internet revolution. I'd never read this essay, and now I can't help but think how similar were our thoughts, and how pleased Benjamin would be in the 21st century

    @shreyapandey376@shreyapandey3764 жыл бұрын
    • yoooo you mind sending me that essay

      @rahmyahbegay5475@rahmyahbegay54753 жыл бұрын
    • Pleasecould you send the essayy pleasere

      @thatxx9513@thatxx95132 жыл бұрын
  • Exceptionally well done.

    @jon780249@jon7802495 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you, very informative

    @oscarmorland3788@oscarmorland37883 жыл бұрын
  • I just wrote more than a few essays about Walter Benjamin and I love love love this video! SUBSCRIBED!

    @JohnSand-cg8gy@JohnSand-cg8gy5 жыл бұрын
    • lol send your essays

      @nickayyyl8167@nickayyyl81675 жыл бұрын
    • @@nickayyyl8167 hahahaha!

      @JohnSand-cg8gy@JohnSand-cg8gy5 жыл бұрын
    • Did you write an essay on this. Cause if so is it possible to send it to me please

      @morala3375@morala33753 жыл бұрын
    • @@morala3375 haha once it gets published

      @JohnSand-cg8gy@JohnSand-cg8gy3 жыл бұрын
  • Very well done video.

    @LogicGated@LogicGated Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent video! It's Davis Douglas btw... :)

    @earthzoneproductions9041@earthzoneproductions90412 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent video, thank you.

    @harrisonmorris5556@harrisonmorris55562 жыл бұрын
  • Amazing content

    @inanedreamz673@inanedreamz6735 жыл бұрын
  • Actually, some 80+ people flew across the Atlantic before Lindbergh -- he wasn't even the first solo pilot. Well done video, however, with lots of wonderful visuals behind the solid thinking. Perfect score as well. Very nice. Congratulations.

    @michaelkoppy@michaelkoppy2 жыл бұрын
  • Easily one of the most important essays of all time

    @HxH2011DRA@HxH2011DRA5 жыл бұрын
    • Complete study notes: Walter Benjamin- "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" eliteraturenotes.blogspot.com/p/walter-benjamin-work-of-art-in-age-of.html?m=1

      @NexGenVision0@NexGenVision03 жыл бұрын
  • Very interesting take!

    @markhesselink@markhesselink5 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome. More Benjamin please.

    @lsobrien@lsobrien5 жыл бұрын
  • Great, so good!

    @andrejzizek4290@andrejzizek42903 жыл бұрын
  • It's frightening how similar my recommended videos look to the ones at 7:20.

    @dclark2529@dclark25294 жыл бұрын
  • 1:55 - Authenticity 3:40 - Politics

    @ignitionfrn2223@ignitionfrn22232 жыл бұрын
  • Very important philosophical essay on art, from a great mind. On par with "The Origin of the Work of Art" by Heidegger.

    @zarathustra8789@zarathustra87895 жыл бұрын
  • it took me some research to understand the French philosopher referred to by Benjamin. It s "Demao" it is George Duhamel

    @user-em7se7bm7v@user-em7se7bm7v13 күн бұрын
  • great video

    @jazzy070298@jazzy0702984 жыл бұрын
  • thought it was 'Ben-ya-meen' .. anyhow, Great summary, almost thought i was listening to Jonathan Meads for a minute ;]

    @allertonoff4@allertonoff45 жыл бұрын
    • My film theory teacher says it "Ben-a-mean" and it was literally a week until I realized how it was spelled.

      @RSpudieD@RSpudieD5 жыл бұрын
    • It’s Ben-yah-mehn

      @alexdonovancole@alexdonovancole4 жыл бұрын
    • Come on guys, it's Ben-ya-fkn-mino.

      @georgekazakos4164@georgekazakos41643 жыл бұрын
  • That was wonderful

    @slumgullion313@slumgullion3134 жыл бұрын
  • I do believe that it is a deep tragedy, that the critique of the culture that Benjamin and in a larger sense that of the Frankfurt school of thought has gone misunderstood by the other side of the political spectrum and that in fact it has become very often a chiffre for old school antisemitism (usually without reading one side of it), while in fact it is equally discontent with various developments with the (post-)modern world

    @89reb@89reb2 жыл бұрын
  • Great video as always. Just wanted to point out that "The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction" was written by Douglas Davis, not David Douglas ;)

    @markymarcm@markymarcm2 жыл бұрын
  • Your recommended "Up next" are eerily similar to mine..

    @ntyh92@ntyh925 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant

    @SeekersofUnity@SeekersofUnity3 жыл бұрын
  • Really Nice, a nice summary of Benjamin's seminal essay. But sorry to be a pedant, wasn't The Work of Art in the Age Digital Reproduction written by Douglas Davis?

    @mattg5328@mattg53285 жыл бұрын
  • the Aura of your Voice :) :)

    @NunpuiiHmar@NunpuiiHmar5 жыл бұрын
    • Massively interesting comment. Shouldn't the aura be dissipated since he was speaking into a microphone with no actual listeners?

      @camiheartzacnskating@camiheartzacnskating4 жыл бұрын
    • Cute comment!

      @lifeisbettergreen@lifeisbettergreen4 жыл бұрын
  • Art Appreciation brought me here!

    @VinceJayEBoter@VinceJayEBoter3 жыл бұрын
  • [7:04] It's Douglas Davies, The Work of Art in the Age of Digital Reproduction (not David Douglas).

    @loncewyse696@loncewyse6964 жыл бұрын
  • Came here after Zizek mentioned a very interesting quote by Benjamin . This guy basically saw the future of the media and art .

    @progyandas9650@progyandas96502 жыл бұрын
  • thanks

    @hanawana@hanawana Жыл бұрын
  • Thank you this was super insightfullllllllllllllllllll

    @gisellehernandez7904@gisellehernandez79044 жыл бұрын
  • 1:35 - im here for an essay hi

    @SophieDainty@SophieDainty4 жыл бұрын
  • Can i get the transcript?

    @sigitadi3867@sigitadi38674 жыл бұрын
  • Very good. Slight note: Works with cult value did not "exist for their own sake." Their value was their cult value .

    @nothingmatters321@nothingmatters32110 күн бұрын
  • Complete study notes: Walter Benjamin- "The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction" eliteraturenotes.blogspot.com/p/walter-benjamin-work-of-art-in-age-of.html?m=1

    @NexGenVision0@NexGenVision03 жыл бұрын
  • Damn, I had Baudrillard flashbacks

    @vidividivicious@vidividivicious5 жыл бұрын
  • Watching this video, I embody Duhamel in his quote, "I can no longer think what I want to think. My thoughts have been replaced by moving images." Is it just me or the thoughts of Benjamin hurriedly spewed by narrator is difficult to weave through a linear narrative that would easily makes sense?

    @jeckreebon@jeckreebon4 жыл бұрын
  • Making sense of capitalist mass REproduction.

    @richardouvrier3078@richardouvrier30785 жыл бұрын
  • I was wondering how to research to write a history book eg verified sources, citations etc.

    @sirlordhenrymortimer6620@sirlordhenrymortimer66205 жыл бұрын
    • Do you mean like academic research?

      @keukenkastje05@keukenkastje055 жыл бұрын
    • @@keukenkastje05 yes

      @sirlordhenrymortimer6620@sirlordhenrymortimer66205 жыл бұрын
    • @@sirlordhenrymortimer6620 Well, first you choose a subject you find interesting and narrow down what you want to write about. For example 'Greek Culture' is to big. But 'Persian influence on Greek Culture in the hundred years after the battle of Salamis' is much more narrowed down and makes it easyer (for you) to research. Now you can more specifically look for sourches: books, articles, essays etc. surrounding that topic. Collect as much as you can find. Now you need a methodology, how are you going to answer your research question (What is the influence of Persian Culture on the Greek Culture in the 100 years after the battle of Salamis?) in a scientific way? Whats your MO. This is the backbone of your research. If you want to show an influence you need to show a distinction before and after, you need to show that the influence is in matter of fact Persian and not something else. This is where you use your sourches. While you write and use information from these sourches you cite your sourches in footnotes and the bibliography (A list of all the sourches you used in your academic research). So the reader knows 1. The writer did research and not made it up him/herself, and 2. I can check those sourches myself. An academic research, most of the time consists of three parts: introduction, middle, conclusion. Introduction: what is the subject? what is my research question? how am I going to answer this question? (Methodology). Middle: actual research, what are your findings? What maybe contradictionary? Coclusion: what is the conclusion of your research, answer of your research question, suggestion for further research and critical reflection on your own research; what could've done beter? This is a rough outline, AR is difficult and more nuanced in practise. Does this answer your question? :)

      @keukenkastje05@keukenkastje055 жыл бұрын
    • @@keukenkastje05 it's very helpful but I want to write an academic article about early Christian influence on Rome:weather it actually led to their ultimate decline (as gibbons predicted) or is it much more complex set of circumstances

      @sirlordhenrymortimer6620@sirlordhenrymortimer66205 жыл бұрын
    • @@sirlordhenrymortimer6620 That's a great topic for an academic research paper! Very interesting. What university do you study at?

      @keukenkastje05@keukenkastje055 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks. Now I want to change the world

    @cimmik@cimmik2 жыл бұрын
  • Don't forget to like the video, boys

    @fallowfieldoutwest@fallowfieldoutwest5 жыл бұрын
    • And share/tweet/tell your neighbour ;)

      @ThenNow@ThenNow5 жыл бұрын
    • and girls!?

      @nadia-000@nadia-0005 жыл бұрын
    • @@nadia-000 Girls, boys and in-betweens

      @fallowfieldoutwest@fallowfieldoutwest5 жыл бұрын
  • Niceeeeeee

    @zhidong5780@zhidong57805 жыл бұрын
  • Just one thing, Benjamin is pronounced Benyamin the J is the same sound like YAnkee.

    @asfaersadfa484@asfaersadfa4843 жыл бұрын
  • He don't look like the type of man I strive to become

    @ScholasticChad@ScholasticChad8 ай бұрын
  • Walter.

    @idk-yh6wx@idk-yh6wx5 жыл бұрын
  • 😎

    @Dreddwinner@Dreddwinner Жыл бұрын
  • , it's not about any political significance it's completely about the art object

    @JVDADV@JVDADV4 жыл бұрын
  • Great! But in this essay there is a secret not revealed!

    @luciferestreladamanha@luciferestreladamanha5 жыл бұрын
    • Theofilo Oliveira which is?

      @mimosamigoza@mimosamigoza5 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah...What is it?

      @luciarodezno4395@luciarodezno43954 жыл бұрын
    • TELL ME PLEASE

      @hugoteubal2972@hugoteubal29722 жыл бұрын
    • @@hugoteubal2972 Hello. There are others influences in this essay. I am finishing my PhD thesis. But now only thing which I can tell you is: Can you speak or read in Portuguese? If your answer is yes, go to Revista Estúd(I)os sobre Fichte. It's easy to find. If you cannot read or speak Portuguese, read again Mirian Hansen. She has a work about this text in a different contexts.

      @luciferestreladamanha@luciferestreladamanha2 жыл бұрын
  • Chill Benny NFTs fixed all that.

    @husamosman375@husamosman3752 жыл бұрын
  • "photographs become standard evidence for historical occurrences, and acquire a hidden political significance" what do you guys think he meant by this?

    @fluffyhiguera4590@fluffyhiguera45903 жыл бұрын
  • None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are self-expressing.

    @TheZeus826@TheZeus8263 жыл бұрын
  • That's the LIE. There is no contribution for the object after but what has been completely recognized is that the artworks do not fall into

    @JVDADV@JVDADV4 жыл бұрын
  • Benjamin/you are using the words 'art' and 'film' interchangeably, which is confusing. This video is just about film... documents of time-based performance/events, characterized by movement and sound. Painting and sculpture are still and silent and only marginally useful as a 'political' tool.

    @aaron2709@aaron27094 жыл бұрын
  • When I was young, I thought Idea was the next step to duplication. Then I realized coming up with ideas were not so difficult. Yet so, to bring forth the idea into the media was not automatic. Thinking is thick thinking. To sustain thought of idea is the source of philosophy (which reminds us of philosophy and Science). Is this all fad? Perhaps there are levels of fad. Or perhaps fad is just another derogatory word for idea.

    @mitchellkato1436@mitchellkato14364 жыл бұрын
    • Beeing that far of, in this short name for a good substitute, in strange ocurance of years passing buy, well for the most suprisive outbrake, let's say it like that, would be just like you said. Bad name for a small interprise. And than the smart things, lose their most important crative aspecet, to see far beyond that, you can easily notice on the street, how appraisal doesn't really change. Loosing, thea rtistic breach towards the straingt comon reward, in wich you can replace a fair amount of shit, mass, with the second thing that comes to mind, paying respect to source and becomin new ideas, are putting you on a path not that lonesome and ugly, as the story goes. A sly in a way hidden, filled up to the end with fair amount of everything that comes to mind, and not to be sought for the complete pile of rubbish, a decent but cynical staying point, as that far of a terrible picture to draw to, would settle more real terms of things to do. Going straight ahead comes with that kind of terms, yet idea is allways present, blank as a day you left behind, on a way to what breings er to full meaning. Dunno, rissing as a bright point in this video beats gray scale depression. Too big to assume anything. Kamoooon

      @milosgrmusa8325@milosgrmusa83254 жыл бұрын
    • @@milosgrmusa8325 O my. I was a bit cloudy. So it invoked cloudy response. There are three levels: realism, abstraction, and non-representation. Realism is realism. Now abstraction goes far. Non-representation is the beginning of intellectualism. And it is wonderful that it works at all. People who faced with non-representational art may simply be dumbfounded.

      @mitchellkato1436@mitchellkato14364 жыл бұрын
  • The pronunciation of benjamin really drives me nuts...

    @minervali631@minervali6313 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks. I would prefer no music, it gets in the way, I find. I actually prefer no visuals too, the footage is only vaguely related to the content, and gets in the way. Nevertheless nice work!

    @g-r-a-e-m-e-@g-r-a-e-m-e-3 жыл бұрын
    • Would you like the narrator to mail you a letter? Containing his script. Or just read Benjamin's essay, if you prefer. And leave the rest of us simple proletariat alone. Good luck...

      @garyspence2128@garyspence2128 Жыл бұрын
    • @@garyspence2128 I prefer no music, or unrelated video, which distracts from the points being made.

      @g-r-a-e-m-e-@g-r-a-e-m-e- Жыл бұрын
  • I think it’s pronounced as BEN YAH MIN.

    @holitinne@holitinne2 жыл бұрын
  • How do you explain that communism exploit art by politicising it?

    @sirlordhenrymortimer6620@sirlordhenrymortimer66205 жыл бұрын
  • 69 comments hahaha

    @jonathansanders5540@jonathansanders55404 жыл бұрын
  • Cult of l'art pour l'art, individuality. Reproducible art is propaganda.

    @richardouvrier3078@richardouvrier30785 жыл бұрын
  • Walter benjamin would like NFTs 😂

    @akshitkumar6193@akshitkumar6193 Жыл бұрын
  • Nice video, but Benjamin's name is pronounced BEH-NEE-MEEN

    @BlueMorningStar@BlueMorningStar5 жыл бұрын
    • actually it is pronounced as *waltah benyamin*

      @LazarMilin@LazarMilin5 жыл бұрын
  • Never got Benjamin's essay. For me the 'aura' of an work of art is a bourgeois aesthetic category, something akin to 'comodity fetishism'. There is nothing revolutionary about it. It is a reactionary concept.

    @Xcalator35@Xcalator35 Жыл бұрын
    • Perhaps it is simply an alternate point of view. And throwing around epithets like 'reactionary' seems counterproductive to actually pondering ideas and issues. You may need to open your narrow mind just a little bit. Just saying...

      @garyspence2128@garyspence2128 Жыл бұрын
    • @@garyspence2128 Well, I think you're right to a certain point. But it seems that Benjamin himself held a view similar to mine after all (at least according to certain readings of his essay). But as I said, I'm not versed in Benjamin's thought so I should be more humble and try to understand it better instead. With that I agree with you.

      @Xcalator35@Xcalator35 Жыл бұрын
    • "Aura" isn't a positive for Benjamin. He's arguing in favor of the destruction of aura in art.

      @dirkturtle3354@dirkturtle33548 ай бұрын
  • NFTs bout to blow homies hair back yo!

    @excessivebleeding36@excessivebleeding362 жыл бұрын
  • Art loses its meaning and value as a practice with each ticking day...

    @RetiredMonolith@RetiredMonolith8 ай бұрын
  • "... the Marxism that runs through doesn't have to be accepted to find value in its arguments ..." I'm sorry, but you are just wrong. The whole essay is a continuance of dialectical materialism straight from Marx. I know for optics sake to get more people on board you need want to sweep that whole line about Communism under the rug but honestly people at this point need to understand the historical context in which things are written and not just associate everything that has to do with Marx with the Soviet Union. Particularly under Stalin. Thumbs down and unsubscribed for your mass appeal compromise.

    @bdinh3130@bdinh3130 Жыл бұрын
  • to bad he got it so wrong politically... a Marxist.

    @cliffdariff74@cliffdariff744 жыл бұрын
    • Hey, he was a Jewish Marxist in Germany, moments before Hitler took over. Joining the Republican party wasn't going to smooth his path to wealth, a home in the suburbs, or a seat in the Reichstag. And capitalism seems to be hanging on by a thread as we speak. If you can even call what we've got capitalism. Socialism for the rich, and feudalism for the rest of us peasants. Don't get caught up in our own propaganda. We're just trying to stay alive and above water. Same old hustle....

      @garyspence2128@garyspence2128 Жыл бұрын
KZhead