Do Madhabs Contradict Hadith? || NBF 297 || Dr Shadee Elmasry
0:00 Snow Day!
0:57 What if a Madhab opposes a Hadith?
3:22 The Answer
13:04 Why is this topic important?
16:30 How do we know the actions of the sahaba?
18:10 What if a Hadith contradicts Imam Abu Hanifa?
22:38 How do laymen understand the madhabs?
25:32 What is a Mursal Hadith?
28:40 Taking the opinion of a Mujtahid outside the 4 schools
29:28 Good Innovation?
32:56 Athari Malikis?
33:08 Contradicting a Mutawatir Hadith
34:24 Drip
34:45 Praying behind Innovators
36:10 What is haram to imagine?
37:21 Are Ibaadis Sunni?
37:47 Tafsir
58:00 The Rosette Nebula
1:05:30 Mistake in Tashahhud
1:06:00 Being a scholar with a busy life
1:07:00 Hadith on not writing down Hadith
1:08:10 Safinas services
1:08:28 Atheists mocking religious morality
1:11:20 Black Magic
1:12:40 Negative Istikhara
1:15:10 Father controlling his son
1:16:04 The sitting position in prayer
1:17:14 The Prophet ﷺ and first revelation
1:17:38 The Ja'fari Madhab
1:17:49 Arkview Essentials
1:18:05 Shaking a womans hand
1:19:43 Reciting the Durood after 1st sitting
1:20:20 Interacting with Jinn
1:21:19 Is Beatboxing Haram?
1:21:55 Hypnotism?
1:22:56 Killing non combatants in war
1:23:59 Astral projection
1:24:35 Following imam al-Maturidi and al-Ash'ari in 'Aqidah
1:26:30 Why be Maliki?
1:28:38 Teaching Fard 'Ayn
1:28:50 Hadith rejectors
1:30:40 Taking action vs Qadr
1:31:41 Are there ahadith that contradict the Quran?
1:33:57 Being Athari and Hanafi
1:34:50 Salawat during sujud
1:34:40 Making dua for specific things
1:37:28 Extra virtuous acts during prayer
1:38:20 Acceptance of Dua
1:40:13 Are settlers military targets?
1:40:38 Seeing questionable acts from your shaykh
1:42:40 Shaykh Shadee vs Zios
1:43:39 Comparative Usul??
1:43:48 Praying without Wudu
1:45:31 Getting therapy
1:45:43 What is 'Ilm al Yaqin?
1:47:30 Can 'Abdals change reality?
1:48:03 Praying for non-muslim family
1:48:18 Changing your madhab
1:48:51 Explaining Madhabs to new muslims
1:49:38 Safina Chat rules
1:50:30 A wali knowing his wilaya
1:54:40 Constantly doubting wudu
1:59:30 Black Turban
1:59:51 Male physical therapy with woman
2:03:26 Shubuhat from sins
2:04:20 Dr Shadees debate
I am a 52 year old convert from Australian and i find your channel fantastic.i would recommend your channel to all new converts.
may Allah keep you on the straight path and give you the best of the dunya and the akhira!
we like it too❤❤❤
Which city Peter?
Nothing but the facts (no innovations, no conjectures, no "visions/inspirations", no "ascribing", no "forgery", no "changes" etc.")! Wonderful channel. Learning a lot. Keep it up Brother.
Exceptional content....more videos required to defend the legacy of Madhabs as salafi freedom has spread like women freedom 😅
Salam Alaikum. I appreciate your work. May Allah bless and preserve you.
I was looking for a video like this!
5:25 Siddi this is the practice of The Hanabila. Imam Ash-Shafi followed the suit with Abu Hanifa and Abu Abd Allahi.
May Allah swt reward you infinitely جزاك الله خيرا يا أمام Ameen
Great work you are doing shaikh
Excellent Lecture!! A detailed podcast would be a great addition!!
Jazakallah khair shiekh
Wallahi I love this channel...
Salam. Can you make a video on hadith rejectors?
Prophet followed Qur'ān alone. Qur'ān (Surah Yunus) 10:15 (U.M.) وَإِذَا تُتْلَىٰ عَلَيْهِمْ ءَايَاتُنَا بَيِّنَٰتٍۙ قَالَ ٱلَّذِينَ لَا يَرْجُونَ لِقَآءَنَا ٱئْتِ بِقُرْءَانٍ غَيْرِ هَٰذَآ أَوْ بَدِّلْهُۚ قُلْ مَا يَكُونُ لِىٓ أَنْ أُبَدِّلَهُۥ مِن تِلْقَآئِ نَفْسِىٓۖ إِنْ أَتَّبِعُ إِلَّا مَا يُوحَىٰٓ إِلَىَّۖ إِنِّىٓ أَخَافُ إِنْ عَصَيْتُ رَبِّى عَذَابَ يَوْمٍ عَظِيمٍ And when Our verses are recited to them as clear evidences, those who do not expect the meeting with Us say, "Bring us a Qur’ān other than this or change it." Say, [O Muḥammad], "It is not for me to change it on my own accord. I only follow what is revealed to me. Indeed I fear, if I should disobey my Lord, the punishment of a tremendous Day."
look up the old safina society podcast episodes from like 2018-19 times. they would discuss stuff like this
Jazakum Allah khair
Thank you ❤
As alwas with banger 🔥🔥🔥
10:47 "May be Heﷺ did it(Raf'ul yadayn) once or twice" Although I m a Hanafi but I disliked the wordings used by Sheikh, most likely it was not meant to be what he said it was in a flow. It's better to say that ibn 'Umar only wanted to say Heﷺ used to do it but it was not his last practice till his last breath. An important note to the people about this issue that The Malikis and Hanafis don't deny that the practice of Raf'ul was never done by Rasoolﷺ or Sahabah, this is a misconception more of a misunderstanding. Our view is that it was done but later on it was abrogated by Rasoolﷺ himself.
I have hope for Islam to unite all around the world in the name of God you worship.
1:45:20 that is true acc to the Hanafis as well.
48:40 on the outer rim: “The universe is expanding, with every galaxy beyond the Local Group speeding away from us. Today, most of the universe's galaxies are already receding faster than the speed of light. All galaxies currently beyond 18 billion light-years are forever unreachable by us, no matter how much time passes.”
As long as it doesn’t contradict the minhaj (Islam Iman and Ihsan) of the Salaf
Most-Persons whom even entertain those Types of Assumptions, that Madhāhib/Religio-Legal Schools "follow Desires" honestly have 0-Idea how al-Fiqh/Religio-Legal Analysis even works. And, in All-Justice/Fairness: even Muslims whom don't claim any Madhāhib...(at This-Point relative to the Revelation of The Qur'ān) for the past Millennium it's basically impossible for any Muslim to not be influenced via any Madhab/Religio-Legal School.
1:07:50 I think there’s like an extreme minority that still do but I do not know how much they follow it.
Who’s the guy he talks about at the end about the debate?
He is Dr. Javad Hashmi (aka JaFed). As the shaykh said, Daniel crushed and humiliated him.
Don’t be a fool and strictly follow one madhab. Men are not free of mistake. All 4 great ulema of the madhahib wanted people to follow that which they followed only when it’s upon proof however if they were wrong in their ijtihad then they wanted us to reject it and follow that which became apparent to be the more correct conclusion. The 4 scholars were all sincere and wise in all of their work but they are not revelation from Allah. The safest way to come to the correct conclusion on a ruling is to learn the opinion from all 4 scholars on that particular scenario and see what proofs each scholar came with, you will find in some situations that 3 of the scholars ruled on something, where the 1 scholar ruled in an opposing opinion but yet after breaking down the evidences, you’ll see the 1 scholar is correct in that particular ruling even though the majority of them ruled different. My point is, all 4 of the scholars are to be followed WITH THE DALEEL BEING CORRECT. If you were to NOT take from just 1 of the scholars then you’ve done yourself a disservice
Make a video on how the Prophet prayed Salah which is mentioned in Bukhari and Muslim
Sunni: "muh Bukhari has more details than Qur'ān, and Bukhari is infallible and can replace Qur'ānic verses, as it can be used in place of Qur'ān.🤡" Qur'ān (Surah Al-An'am) 6:114 (U.M.) أَفَغَيْرَ ٱللَّهِ أَبْتَغِى حَكَمًا وَهُوَ ٱلَّذِىٓ أَنزَلَ إِلَيْكُمُ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ مُفَصَّلًاۚ وَٱلَّذِينَ ءَاتَيْنَٰهُمُ ٱلْكِتَٰبَ يَعْلَمُونَ أَنَّهُۥ مُنَزَّلٌ مِّن رَّبِّكَ بِٱلْحَقِّۖ فَلَا تَكُونَنَّ مِنَ ٱلْمُمْتَرِينَ [Say], "Then is it other than Allāh I should seek as judge while it is He who has revealed to you the Book [i.e., the Qur’ān] explained in detail?" And those to whom We [previously] gave the Scripture know that it is sent down from your Lord in truth, so never be among the doubters. Qur'ān (Surah Al-An'am) 6:53-55 (U.M.) وَكَذَٰلِكَ فَتَنَّا بَعْضَهُم بِبَعْضٍ لِّيَقُولُوٓا۟ أَهَٰٓؤُلَآءِ مَنَّ ٱللَّهُ عَلَيْهِم مِّنۢ بَيْنِنَآۗ أَلَيْسَ ٱللَّهُ بِأَعْلَمَ بِٱلشَّٰكِرِينَ وَإِذَا جَآءَكَ ٱلَّذِينَ يُؤْمِنُونَ بِـَٔايَٰتِنَا فَقُلْ سَلَٰمٌ عَلَيْكُمْۖ كَتَبَ رَبُّكُمْ عَلَىٰ نَفْسِهِ ٱلرَّحْمَةَۖ أَنَّهُۥ مَنْ عَمِلَ مِنكُمْ سُوٓءًۢا بِجَهَٰلَةٍ ثُمَّ تَابَ مِنۢ بَعْدِهِۦ وَأَصْلَحَ فَأَنَّهُۥ غَفُورٌ رَّحِيمٌ وَكَذَٰلِكَ نُفَصِّلُ ٱلْءَايَٰتِ وَلِتَسْتَبِينَ سَبِيلُ ٱلْمُجْرِمِينَ And thus We have tried some of them through others that they [i.e., the disbelievers] might say, "Is it these whom Allāh has favored among us?" Is not Allāh most knowing of those who are grateful?[1] And when those come to you who believe in Our verses, say, "Peace be upon you. Your Lord has decreed upon Himself mercy: that any of you who does wrong out of ignorance and then repents after that and corrects himself - indeed, He is Forgiving and Merciful." And thus do We detail the verses, and [thus] the way of the criminals will become evident. Qur'ān (Surah An-Nisa') 4:60 (U.M.) أَلَمْ تَرَ إِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ يَزْعُمُونَ أَنَّهُمْ ءَامَنُوا۟ بِمَآ أُنزِلَ إِلَيْكَ وَمَآ أُنزِلَ مِن قَبْلِكَ يُرِيدُونَ أَن يَتَحَاكَمُوٓا۟ إِلَى ٱلطَّٰغُوتِ وَقَدْ أُمِرُوٓا۟ أَن يَكْفُرُوا۟ بِهِۦ وَيُرِيدُ ٱلشَّيْطَٰنُ أَن يُضِلَّهُمْ ضَلَٰلًۢا بَعِيدًا Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt,[1] while they were commanded to reject it; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray.
Yes. This is the best and only way. JazaakaAllaah
Even though he's a scholar of Hadith, Bukhari himself had his own school of jurisprudence. He's not himself a Hanbali, nor a Shafie, nor Maliki and Hanafi.
burikta !
While I commend the Sheikh for wanting the majority of lay Muslims to stick to one of the four schools of fiqh, at around @28.40, he makes the usual useless claims of the scholars of the four schools. Perhaps he should have explained to his audience, in Islamic history, there have been several schools of fiqh. Imam Tabari had his own school of fiqh, Ibn Hazm wrote an entire encyclopaedia of fiqh based on the Zaheeri school of law, called ‘al muhalla’. Is Dr Shadee seriously considering anyone who follows Ibn Hazm ‘deviant’ ? When it comes to the ritualistic acts of Islam; salat, fasting, hajj, umrah, etc , they have been perfectly preserved. Umar was the caliph for 10 years and would have lead the daily prayers in the Prophet’s[saw] masjid. The Sunnah has been preserved. What is really important for Muslims is to understand the law when it comes to: 1. When the Qur’aan and Sunnah only give a general principle , 2. When the Qur’aan and Sunnah are silent and give no ruling. This is when most educated Muslims are really not interested in the opinions of imams who have long passed away.
Very strong criticism and praise. What is your credentials brother? Assuming your qualified what other alternative do you suggest and how is it better than majority of scholars agreed understanding of islam?
Brother, You have a valid point but can you please give some examples ( with sources) about something that was preserved and the madhabs went against? Just trying to understand your position. A healthy debate furthers everybody's knowledge.
He already explained that there have been abandoned schools of Fiqh in other NBF episodes in the past, not to mention that it is irrelevant to mention that in the context of teaching laypeople about the importance of the four madhabs, and he even explains that in the timestamp you marked: "Just because you see it in a book it doesn't mean its a sound transmission" Moreover, there is an agreement between scholars of Ahlul Sunnah that after the Four Madhabs have been perfectly preserved/transmitted, have thoroughly covered all what needed to be covered, and found acceptance among the general community of scholars: it is impermissible to exit the space of the four Madhabs. This is common knowledge in the books of Usul al-Fiqh and I'm unsure whether you're seriously unaware of this or is it that you're disingenuous? "What is really important for Muslims....." Is to follow an Imam that can explain the rulings to them. Understanding 'how' rulings are isn't really in the capacity of the average person, think how doctors give medicine to non-doctors , and those "imams who have long passed away" (novelty fallacy) have done a better job than most or all scholars after them in explaining the primary sources of Islam, that's why we follow them, and if you think they didn't, point out you think does.... P.S: FYI Zahirism isn't considered a real Madhab, they have no principles to unite on from the first place, and they consider Ijtihad obligatory on every single person. (in al-Muhalla for example).
Thank you for the lengthy essay on why following the four schools of fiqh has now become 'obligatory' in Sunni islam! Do you know how ridiculous you sound? Do you have any idea what taqleed has done to the Muslim ummah? Do you not even think why the Qur'an and sunnah give general principles in most of the ahkam ad Deen? Have you even read the sahih hadith in Muslim where a common lay Muslim asked the prophet about matters he the Prophet has not spoken about? If you had, then you would understand why Ibn hazm quotes it in the introduction to al muhalla.
It seems you have neither studied the Quran nor Sunnah or a book of Fiqh in your life. You're absolutely clueless on what you're talking about, don't confuse the people here with your deviant personal opinions. As for those interested in learning, I highly recommend reading Shaykh Abdul Hakim Murad's article called "Understanding the Four Madhhabs: The Problem with Anti-Madhhabism", and the new videos on Madhabs here.