How China Got the Bomb

Now they are repeating the very same statement and targeting Iran.

yo dude

❤😂

🤣

😂😂😂😂😂😂

牛

向老一辈致敬👏

And now you are in the Unites States

LIAR

And now it's the chips. Believe it or not, in 5 years, China will catch up on chip making.

The lesson here will be dont let china do something herself if you want to conquer the world

Communism it issss !!

@@JP-rk6gw It already caught up. At least 10 years early than expected.

@@JP-rk6gw not really, as chinese. i think. back to 60 yrs ago, ppl have faith , have spirits. ppl believed in gov and hold the hope to the future . today , china is essentially grown up to be a bureaucratic capitalism country. people's mindset is different

日本战败后，留在东北的工业基地让苏联抢走你怎么不说？

The science and R&D are just as important in building those machines and infrastructure to make the bomb. The R&D and planning of building a skyscraper may also be dwarfed by the costs associated with actually building it but you can’t have one without the other. The cost does not necessarily = the importance.

@@hollandoats4738 theyare both important. But by the 60s a nuclear bomb wasn’t as cutting edge as it once was in 30s and 40s. It was just a matter of copying much more instead of figuring out the physics and engineering from scratch.

It's the design, bro. Recommended reading: _Plutonium, A History of the World's Most Dangerous Element._ The R&D Los Alamos financed involved the world's smartest men, full stop. There's a very conspicuous reason why Nobel prizes get awarded in a proportion that is fantastically out of whack with China's population, especially if you ignore awards that are given for accomplishments that are fundamentally engineering as opposed to invention or theory. Hindsight, such as concerning the development of the bomb, does not alter this reality. China are conspicuously aware of this discrepancy; it's part of the reason why they're so desperate to make a name in scientific papers that they willfully flood publications with tripe and outright fraud.

@@Asterra2 Funny.If you think China adds lies to your paper, then you should read papers written by Chinese people well, because lies cannot make DF-21

This guy has no idea whatsoever how the Chinese got the atomic bomb. When the Jewish Rosenberg couple stolen the atomic bomb planes, and sold it to the Soviet Union, they also gave the patent to Israel. Israel had the plans how to make the atomic bomb, but not the necessary elements, or the materials. China had them both. Therefore Israel and China combined their possessions, and made the atomic bomb together. That is how Israel and China got the atomic bomb in about the same time.

it was published in details by Americans

It was...as with almost everything Chinese, there they took from America, even America's education. You should not be able to study nuclear physics and then go to a different country to help build their nuclear ambitions as China and Israel benefited.

@@the_DOS why didn't other countries do the same thing?

​@@the_DOSthat doesn't sound like freedom to me. Hypocritical much?

He in the end was driven out of the US due to blatant racial discrimination which backfired disastrously as he joined and became the head of the PRC's nascent missile programmes.

@@nicholasmaude6906 Alot of the scientist was driven out of america due to racial issues.

#nichilasmaude Because communists do not steal property especialy intelectual... HAHA The programmer who wrote the Tetris game (in his spare time) didn't get a cent until the USSR collapsed even though the West was paying for the right to use the program? Your comment is blatant racial discriminational lie and anyone with little will to check it can confirm it ->Chien-Shiung Wu (Chinese: 吳健雄) -> She was important scientist in Manhattan Project -> she was Chinese -> she was from China -> she was a woman -> no-one kicked her out->and i have the feeling that she helped with development of China attomic weapond even if Asianometry did not found any info about it... ->she wanted to be buried in China...

I remember he was one of the five creator of JPL.

Yes, he is mostly known in China as the 'Father of China's Space Program'. There's a big, new-ish museum dedicated to him at Shanghai's Jiaotong University. Nicely designed building, by the way.

At least in China, one of the hyper sonic ballistic reentry method was named after him. Which is a key to modern hypersonic missiles. I think that method is like bouncing multiple time with atmosphere, which not only greatly increase the range, but also make the missile much harder to intercept.

In Europe and the United States, at least among the English speaking people, deep-rooted racial discrimination and the idea of a superior ethnic group remain deeply ingrained. France, Germany, and even Iran are the same, they still feel that the Chinese are inferior. This is a cultural imprint left by the colonial era that lasted for 400 years, and it is difficult to easily remove them.

Also, I wish you good health.

实际上在过去几千年里，欧洲（美国没有历史）远远落后于中国@@siroyiryuu

Witness of history, I wish you good health.

I be seeing chongqing in cyberpunk tiktoks

Another fun story: the factory which is part of the project, was on the edge of shut down due to lack of funding, so they use those centrifuges to make ice cream.... It was called 504 ice cream lol

​@@kaymanwangthat's pretty epic

@@kaymanwang

It is weird how beliefs outlive people. People who believed in national socialism in 1939 are dead yet people who love national socialism are alive today. Nukes do make a war costly, high risk, high reward. They are so powerful that earth would be destroyed forever.

That was in 1969 I think, long after

England has Scotland and northern Ireland in a nuclear vice.

@@ShengYu1995 It was an ongoing thing basically. Russia invaded Xinjiang in 1944, and that was, from the back of my head, Russia's 6th invasion of China.

@@ShengYu1995the sino-soviet split was in 61 with skirmishes being a problem throughout the 60s and early 70s

This channel is a taiwanese dpp channel so he will belittle mainland china every opportunity

Yeah a lot of problems in Ireland, Rental prices, lack of house development, infrastructure stagnation is caused by socialist policies ther unfortunately same goes with most of EU nations and UK as well, they had always been backstabbers to the nations of the west , even US is run by traitors

I have to correct you here. Such weapons have never been created as those reactions are pure fantasy. But it is funny that guys like you buy propaganda about them and parrot it.

Wouldn't an out-of-synch detonation just destroy the fissile material?

​​@@theotherohlourdespadua1131 it would "fizzle"- (thats the term). maybe some limited chain reaction, but mostly, an explosive disassembly of your expensive nuclear device. (depending on how bad your synchronization is, and i guess how optimized the design- a fat man spherical implosion or two- point explosive lens is propaply more robust than a miniaturized nuke )

@@nos9784 Only in fantasy world.

@@theotherohlourdespadua1131 Since a few decades ago, US bombs are specifically designed for safety in accidents, such that they would not produce a nuclear explosion if only a single detonator fires. This is called "one point safe design". This requires certain amount of effort to achieve. In weapons that are not one point safe, even an asymmetrical implosion can result in a sizable nuclear yield, albeit typically much reduced compared to the full scale explosion. Older US weapons were not necessarily one point safe, and it is not known whether weapons of other countries are.

China had their sights on a stockpile from day one.

I'm honestly not sure if this is a real comment or a bot...

I've read of Seismic activity in the Negev in 1963 that couldn't be determined.

This pretty much shows t j at the real trick is getting the pure radioactive fuel for thr bombs that is the trickiest part.

The precision timing of the explosives is an important detail back in the dark ages of ww2 making the triggers was pretty difficult the U.S. effort had a trigger failure in the lab just prior to the use of the first plutonium bomb. There was some concer that dropping a bomb might just be a delivery of highly enriched fissile material if the bomb malfunctioned then Japan would have all they needed to make a bomb to drop on The U. S.

This guy has no idea whatsoever how the Chinese got the atomic bomb. When the Jewish Rosenberg couple stolen the atomic bomb planes, and sold it to the Soviet Union, they also gave the patent to Israel. Israel had the plans how to make the atomic bomb, but not the necessary elements, or the materials. China had them both. Therefore Israel and China combined their possessions, and made the atomic bomb together. That is how Israel and China got the atomic bomb in about the same time.

This guy has no idea whatsoever how the Chinese got the atomic bomb. When the Jewish Rosenberg couple stolen the atomic bomb planes, and sold it to the Soviet Union, they also gave the patent to Israel. Israel had the plans how to make the atomic bomb, but not the necessary elements, or the materials. China had them both. Therefore Israel and China combined their possessions, and made the atomic bomb together. That is how Israel and China got the atomic bomb in about the same time.

Khrushchev was ousted 4 days before the detonation.

带着你的小岛消失😊

马兰开花

@@xinalityo 原来是这个意思。我们小时候经常唱这首童谣。

Really, I though it was about Deng Xiaoping's son.

I mean its pretty biased against the Soviet Union and China, but still factual information and a good video!

@@larllarfleton how so?

@@fedyx1544 To begin with, the security of a nation has no price especially after the Chinese experience in the korean war against Murica. To stress that the cost of the Chinese nuclear program was exhorbitant at the time given the hardships the Chinese were going through is a biased view if you don't also stress the context in which this program became a pressing issue for the Chinese national security. So, it's pretty obvious that a biased bent to the narrative that jumped to the eye.

@@bobmorane4926 Pointing to resource allocation and how much went into each pot is bias?

​@Bob Morane Watch it again, he focused on the United States threats to China early on in the video and doesn't sugarcoat how maniacal they got. What was he just not supposed to mention that compared to other Nuclear powers at that point China was working with far fewer resources and was at thatpoint the only developing nation to work towards it and achieve it?

And that is just what he was saying in public. In private he planned, in the event of war, to steal the nukes that were under the control of the civilian AEC and decide for himself who to bomb

Likewise MacArthur wanted to use nukes on the Chinese when they attacked in N. Korea - it was one of the issues that led to his firing by Truman. It's a good thing US military is under firm civilian control.

@@cv990a4 McArthur and LeMay...it's an F-ing miracle we never went to war with those two running loose. Luckily we've had competent civilian leadership or competent military leadership during dark times. Except for the Vietnam war when (in my opinion) civilian and military leadership was feckless. I was a marketing major so...I know these things.

@@theodoreolson8529 The low point wasn't Vietnam. That was dumb, but then Cheney said "hold my beer" and engineered the US invasion of Iraq. That was the low point. I always thought, growing up, that we'd never again be stupid enough to do another Vietnam. And I was right - we did something far worse.

and the second that ended the Democrats got us into a proxy war with Russia. I'm beginning to think the military industrial complex doesn't actually want world peace

He still was part of the manhattan project, he wasnt nuclear physicist but still take part of it, something that help partially to make the nukes.

To be plain, he helped other scientists to solve the basic science and made the nuclear bomb fly. :)

This channel just doesnt research enough when it comes to china due to his taiwanese bias

Co founder of JPL in NASA

Crisis precipitates change

当你的朋友不再把他的作业给你去抄，你将不得不自己去完成作业。效果显而易见，成绩提高。中国就是这样的情况

@@user-ho2hg1pf3k ， 肯定不是平白拿来抄，都是一个交易。像到外国留学一样，付钱换知识，要有志气才会干的事，不然在乡下耕田算了。 钱付了，讲师又不来教课，学生唯有自强。这样才是中国的情况。

The world should be thankful that Russia and China posses technology to make nuclear bomb. Imagine if USA and Uk are the only countries with Nuclear weapon, they would have colonised the world.

When China can no longer buy advanced chips they rebrand Intel chips and call them their own.

I would say that China nuclear bomb was inevitable since US does not have an effective method to prevent development like that with Iran.

没有苏联的帮助 中国也会拥有核武器 时间长一点而已

@@user-yt7bz4bx4o 对。我的意思是不太可能在1960年代就完成原子弹。氢弹的基础是原子弹，就更不可能了。

Not impossible, would've just taken several more decades.

​​@@johnmackenzie3871 that's what impossible means in that context. Ofc technological challenges only ever get easier. By impossible they surely meant "impossible to complete in that decade". The political weight of China would have been a lot different without that development that early. Even its seat in the UN security council wouldn't necessarily have been come that early. And Russia might have reacted differently to the skirmishes of the 60s and 70s.

🧮

Yes, my predecessors suffered too much, but they also did the greatest thing! !

Where can we read this document

This video is quite biased though….

@@johnny5584 google "no first strike" and "china nuclear deterrence doctrine" Good luck.

@@NeostormXLMAX lol nope

@@NeostormXLMAX this channel has always had a bias

Sounds like the specialist knew more about protecting the US government from paying out money than about radiation related disease

I was a teenager when I saw Zhou En-lai in a motorcade that passed our home.

Sexy Zhou Enlai was pretty rad

Victor M Deru, KZhead, PhD levels will never work here, you need audience ! You can never trust Arabs, or Communists, only trust the West.

Geopolitics is what drives technology in a lot of cases.

I was about to write the same. DeGaulle Force de Frappe

They will have to invent their own optics industry aswell, if it is possible for China to catch up they will need to do the work of several nations and decades of research in the next few years and given how many chip founders go bankrupt after wasting billions of RMB I cant see this happening. There is a reason why EUV tech is only know and controlled by a few companies.

isn't China basically already the world leader in economy and education right now? and manufacturing? I'm confused

The Chinese keep saying with a chuckle that there's nothing godly or supernatural, it's all human creations that can be reproduced by whoever has the will and the resources. I don't think they ever believed in exceptionalism and they're starting to rub it in the muricans faces.

@@supabass4003 Asml has Carl zeiss, Japs have Nikon and Canon. I thought the Chinese hv their own optics industry leader , who is it again ?

@@clown134 Not exactly, China is a leading manufacturing place, it's really good in plenty of areas such as material science and such, but it has areas to catch up at the very high end (where most profit is located). One of those areas is chip manufacturing, first of all you need 3 requirements to manufacture a Chip, The ability to design a Chip (China does have this), access to commonly used architectures today (X86 or ARM, both propietary of the west, China no longer possesses access to this at least not for important stuff), and lastly, semiconductors, which is what Chips are made of. In the case of Design as I said China has the expertise and can design advanced Chips fairly easily, in the case of architecture, this is harder, because even though China knows how to do stuff in those architectures, they cannot officially do it because of licensing problems, so they are switching ATM to RISC-V which is an alternative architecture which is open source and won't suffer from licensing issues and or blacklisting by America or its allies. Lastly, the most important and hardest one is semiconductors. Right now China can reliably make semi modern semiconductors with decent yield, the problem starts when you need ones for more advanced applications, such as supercomputers, AI Chips or even the latest consumer CPUs. They are on sub 10nm (actually 5nm and lower), China has managed to design and produce 7nm semiconductors but with low yield, let alone anything below that. Reason? They lack the tools to make them. China does not posses DUV (up to around 2010s) (although it's working on these), let alone EUV machines (made by ASML utilizing like 100k parts from different countries, including the US), this is the biggest hurdle to China, it needs to produce these. Japan was the leader in DUV in the 90s but then US trade war and restrictions made Japan unable to cooperate with America in EUV design, then America cooperated instead with the netherlands and ASML managed to produce EUV, Nikon (Japan) almost got there, stopped at the 2nd prototype, but they gave up cause it was too late/too expensive mid 2008-2011 economic crisis. China is currently on a massive effort to make these machines, but it will likely take them maybe to close to 2030(?) to get close to the west, unless of course a breakthrough happens for even smaller semiconductor node sizes, but even then they would still need to catch up in EUV to produce stuff that requires those nodes.

It's harder to get the material to make it than to design it

@@user-pd9ju5dk5s It is hard to create something which has never been created and proven in reality.

@@kordelas2514 It was already proven by the Americans when they dropped it on Japan. China wasnt the first

@@user-pd9ju5dk5s How did you verify it? Do you claim that damage done in Japan could be done only by those weapons and not napalm and mustard gas?

​@@kordelas2514 if you have a statement to make, please state it.

He's Taiwanese

you dont even watch the second video of his...

Yes, the more they steal IP from other countries & commit corporate espionage, they'll eventually steal enough to catch up! Too bad creating nothing of your own leads to zero soft power or influence outside of your own country

i dont think semi conductors are that easy . amercians are like far far ahead of any country in semi conductor technology , i learned somewhere ibm has created on of the brilliant semi conductors , and figuring out the machine which prints on fab is made in netherlands and america now being active in this field is not possible for chinese , it might take them decades , in that much time americans will be far more ahead of them , people underestimate american technology leap compared to rest of the world combined .

@@opai1821 u got so much confident on Americunt technology but even Americunts got no confident, they imposes sanction after sanction until they no longer got any bullet left to do anything to China. Lol.

@@CouchDoritos 现在美国已经没有人力资源和制度资源跟中国在科学技术领域pk了。最多10年，中国将在所有科学技术领域碾压盎傻集团。目前之所以还有很多人闭眼崇美或看低中国，主要是他们因为看不清存量技术和新增技术的区别。前年杨洁篪面对布林克的挑衅说“你们没有资格跟中国说以实力出发打交道”是有实力依据的。

Weird way to say treason.

Dad science jokes, kill me.

Is she lady Currie?

@@jchanmcse No. She worked in the Curie institute.

the Chinese student must be 钱三强

@@Myst21Sid I suppose I could ask the lady, but she must be about 95 years old and might have trouble remembering.

​@@Myst21Sid 参与研究的人不止新闻上说的那么几个，很多都是幕后工作，我们知道的只是主要的几个领导

Maybe the national secret is that China never built a nuclear bomb as U.S./soviets never built one since nuclear bombs not real. It was only national fear propaganda made in Hollywood Basement.

That's a happy ending.

The country of Taiwan is an impressive place, except for the shark finning industry.

​@@southbound1969 province *

@@ali99_82 The country of Taiwan has NEVER been ruled by or pays taxes to dirty China.

He is from taiwan so all his videos about china are biased, he is also an american citizen so he keeps shilling and defending America especially when it comes to them destroying japans economy

@@NeostormXLMAX Only taiwanese actually understand Taiwan. Not some mainlanders who know nothing about the locals.

China is going to the moon in the next 4 year. Let see how many countries will tune in to watch it. West will finally accept China as a competitor.

@@Linkwii64 It's _accept,_ not except. Except means _to leave out._

@@hananokuni2580 corrected

@@hananokuni2580 Finicky! You knew what he meant.

@@yawos9024 OK, OK, I get it! Gotta cut some slack. Let's remember that we have non-native English speakers reading our comments. We native speakers know when to distinguish between _accept_ and _except,_ but a non-native English speaker with limited experience will more often than not get confused.

This guy has no idea whatsoever how the Chinese got the atomic bomb. When the Jewish Rosenberg couple stolen the atomic bomb planes, and sold it to the Soviet Union, they also gave the patent to Israel. Israel had the plans how to make the atomic bomb, but not the necessary elements, or the materials. China had them both. Therefore Israel and China combined their possessions, and made the atomic bomb together. That is how Israel and China got the atomic bomb in about the same time.

neither should you.

they probably shouldn't talk about what they did

希望你也替你爸妈保密，这是油管，害人之心不可有，防人之心不可无。

小心你成为有心人士盯梢的对象。

Your face Chinese stubborn people! Feeling high 😂

米を植えるときも米を刈り入れるときも我慢が要ります。

😂 just like Americans

@@hananokuni2580 中華民族が繁栄して強くなったら、まず軍国主義日本を排除することだ！

@@bronzebuilder2115 At least we didn't kill native American Indians and made their scalps into boots.

@Jizz I didn't think of that...didn't cross my mind. And I'm happy that he's a fellow American. In fact, I'm even more impressed. LOL Besides, it doesn't change anything in regards to the content.

Keep that mindset of purging western education lies and misdirections because it’s rampant my friend. Cheers.

This guy has no idea whatsoever how the Chinese got the atomic bomb. When the Jewish Rosenberg couple stolen the atomic bomb planes, and sold it to the Soviet Union, they also gave the patent to Israel. Israel had the plans how to make the atomic bomb, but not the necessary elements, or the materials. China had them both. Therefore Israel and China combined their possessions, and made the atomic bomb together. That is how Israel and China got the atomic bomb in about the same time.

Ahem infographics show

@@cjclark1208 As Chinese, may China purge it’s own propaganda and censorship as well. Cheers

Looks more like the type of government doesn't really matter very much, it's more about interests and tribalism. Nothing new. US has overthrown plenty of democracies. Look at Ukraine, they elected a pro-russian gov and was immediately overthrown by US. Now, it's just a one party state. Not like if you have the same government you'll be friends. You are friends because your interest collides. That's all.

A not unimportant factor in this is that when Mao went to Moscow, he turned out to be not toilet trained. And his personal hygiene was none too good.

@@keithammleter3824 Before Mao Zedong entered Beijing in 1949, he had been living in the countryside. He was 56 years old at the time, and many living habits could not be changed. Moreover, his ideology does not allow him to live a modern life as soon as he enters the city. In his philosophy, this is a corrupt behavior.

@@keithammleter3824 2023年了还有人信台湾和美国CIA共同出版的关于毛泽东的私人保健医生的回忆录。

Ideology is just label tag...everything depends on power

Is there a point there somewhere? They had plans of what to do if things went south with the allies as well, and it’s a good thing. A military that doesn’t look at the possibility of conflicts and how to handle them isn’t doing it’s job properly.

​​@@smeagle3295 sure, but nations dont go openly stating they want to nuke you. Which the us and the soviets very much did to china. That is, openly threaten nuclear annihilation.

I remember reading that. General MacArthur clashed with President Truman over the bomb controversy. MacArthur didn't want to go through another long drawn out war like he did in WW1 and WW2. Truman just thought it was too dangerous considering the Soviets would likely retaliate against the US.

@@winnienguyen4420 所以中国在美苏冷战时期在全国狂挖了一万个防空洞

the difference is nato is an offensive contract

for example iraq, yugoslavia, libya, afghanistan etc, never attacked any nato country. but they were still invaded by an organized nato force. nato = mercenary for the usa. france got in massive trouble and had sanctions placed on them for refusing to help invade iraq

@@NeostormXLMAX boo hoo, you can't commit genocide and ethnic cleansing freely anymore.