Taco (Atheist Presuppositional Apologist) Runs the Script on longsword (Christian)
2024 ж. 26 Сәу.
1 072 Рет қаралды
I was just hanging out in the religion channel working on a video and this guy popped in and immediately started trying to ask me questions about salvation so I hit record. I responded to his really aggressive preaching, addressed his initial questions, and then ran the atheist presupp script on him until he broke during the corrected watchmaker analogy.
Join us at discord.gg/politics.
Please like, comment, and subscribe for more great videos!
It’s hilarious hearing the presupp script turned against them.
What? They are just dropping a worldview body double of my argument.
The Bible doesn't say "prove all things", it says to test all the prophecies you are told to see if they are true.
Fair
I love how theist (not just presupps) think their own arguments are nonsense when used against them xD
LOL
Awesome
Thank you!
i do t believe this is a real Christian. I think this is a skit, and they are being played by a buddy pretending to dumb Christian. There's no way they would just sit and actually listen.
LOL
@@realBreakfasttacos But for real though... this was legit a Christian trying to pre-supp you?
@@orionred2489 They always are lol
I DO reject the self-evident truth of our shared naturalistic atheistic reality that's been revealed to me through both natural and special revelation! Apparently the atheistic reality doesn't love me enough to reveal itself to me, it just keeps hiding through my own solipsistic logic. :(
You are just rejecting it in your unrighteousness.
You are a moron.
The atheist has a hard time accepting the basic presupposition of Christianity: that God exists and is the source and fount of all knowledge. Instead he wants to believe all sorts of fanciful presuppositions, like that the sense-perception can somehow observe reality, that those observations are meaningful outside the immediate experience, that those observations are independent of the observer (even though modern science does not even claim this), that general truths can be obtained from specific observations, that mathematics is not only consistent and a legitimate branch of knowledge (even though mathematics itself does not claim this), but that it can also be meaningful applied to reality to make statements about reality, and that that reality is consistent enough across space and time that meaningful statements can be made about it. Say what you want about religion, but it maintains internal consistency to a degree that empirical observation has never lived up to. To still believe in science given the inherent contradictions between Quantum Mechanics and Relativity and the issues both have raised with observer-dependent frames of reference, to say nothing with the problems with the foundations of mathematics as revealed by Godel, is simply cult-like behavior. Science is dead by its own hand.
The theists have a hard time accepting the self evident truth of our shared naturalistic/atheistic reality that has been revealed to all of sound mind through both natural and special revelation. Christian presuppositional apologetics is proven false by the account of knowledge provided in this video.
@@realBreakfasttacos That is correct.
@@kidslovesatan34 Thank you!
@@realBreakfasttacos But your 'self-evident truth' results in a logical contradiction. Obviously, any system can only be evaluated by its internal logic, not on the basis of axioms foreign to the system; but that doesn't mean they can't be evaluated, they just have to be evaluated by their own internal logic and yours creates a contradiction. Or do you have a theory of Quantum Gravity that reconciles the inherent contradictions resulting from the various observations that form the basis of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics? I'm not raising questions about the legitimacy of your revelation, per se, simply about the internal consistency thereof. Simultaneously believing two logically contradictory propositions isn't generally associated with 'soundness of mind.' That still wouldn't address questions of objective truth, those are obviously unprovable and faith based in any axiomatic system; but it would be a step in the right direction by removing a rather blatant and known contradiction that has arisen from your presuppositions...and it's far from the only one, it's just perhaps the most well known, best explored, and least philosophical.
@@costakeith9048Bro you know no one reads past the very first part in youtube comments. There is no contradiction and the reason it scares you is because this argument shows your god does not exist.
"I'm your dungeon master" 😂
I love DND
@@realBreakfasttacos And he didn't flinch at all.
I wish he didn't have to run off, I wanted to hear the rest of the natural watchmaker argument. At no point did he indicate that he understood what you were doing there.
He has listened to me present the argument a bunch of times. I ran it something like 50 times before I made a youtube video with it. I wanted to perfect it.