LARGE SCALE NAVAL WARFARE IN NORTHEAST AISA (WORLD WAR III VIDEO 8)

2023 ж. 11 Мау.

220 535 Рет қаралды

LARGE SCALE NAVAL WARFARE IN NORTHEAST AISA
cinematic video
This video is about the Korean and Japanese navies fighting against China.
This video was made using DCS WORLD and ARMA3.
The music in the video is by MAKAI SYMPHONY.
makai-symphony.com/

Пікірлер

That's exactly how a large scale naval warfare would happen IRL. Awesome bro.
@DiddyKing175 ай бұрын
- Thanks^^
  @milsimk5 ай бұрын
"You thought it was Haneda, but it was I, Dio! Wryyyyyy!" Proceeds to terrorize Chinese fleet
@bcox54909 ай бұрын
I want to point out one mistake. JASDF and RoKAF aircraft would have gotten into the air once air defenses detect and intercepted many missiles. Then there's naval ships with AEGIS and a few American air defenses as well.
@itzyaboimemez207411 ай бұрын
- To reduce the kinetic energy of a fleet air missile? We could have a little more chance of avoiding it.
  @milsimk10 ай бұрын
- Yes overlapping means of defense, plus... JGSDF Type 88 and Type 12 should got engaged as well.
  @lukejohnston46667 күн бұрын
That KF-21 mod for DCS is cool, where did you get it ??
@mraviatorboii25108 ай бұрын
- I asked a 3D designer to make it.
  @milsimk8 ай бұрын
Why missiles still do not zig zag during terminal approach ? That ability has been available for decades.
@onetruekeeperАй бұрын
Awesome work!
@jimkluska2536 ай бұрын
The JMSDF also operates SM-3 Block IIA, which are very lethal ship launched BMD missiles, as well as SM-6 very long SAM. The 120 Ballistic Missile is unlikely to get through the Korean and Japanese BMD system. It can't even get through Taiwanese BMD systems
@maxlin344211 ай бұрын
- The proof of such is claim is from what real world experience? Two things we know, Ballistic missiles have been tested numerous time in battle. They are fired and arrive at or near their targets. Its a simple fact. The second thing is defense systems which have been designed to stop Ballistic Missiles have failed time and again to intercept ballistic missiles. Real world facts. Gulf war Scuds had no problem getting past patriots, actually not a single intercept. In Saudi Arabia Patriot pac 3 failed to stop Tochkas and Houthi Fajir 5... In Ukraine you can watch as KH47 defeats patriot again. In Iraq the Iranian Fataha BM defeated Patriot as well as short range sam and phalynx to hit american bases. There is no current system that is fielded that has any real world record of successful intercepts of a BM. Let alone a massed attack. Including sm3 and sm6, neither of which have been proven to work in a real world situation/combat. all historical data suggests that the BM would be the clear winner.
  @TP-ie3hj10 ай бұрын
- This is only for show. In a real war, CCP will lose 2/3 of their naval force before USA comes in.
  @WildeBoone-jq8ru3 ай бұрын
That was mad !! It was really well put together 🫡
@Peter-ho1qw4 ай бұрын
You know I realized something recently, the HHQ-9B has a quoted range of about 250km, and is meant to be the cutting edge for China, but the US' SM-2 ER Blk IV from 1999 has a range of 370km... and, the US Arleigh Burke has 96 missile cells while the standard Type 052D only has 64, some of which are reserved for anti ship/land attack missiles...
@totalNERD-eo7wx26 күн бұрын
😮
@criskieferrodriguez15488 ай бұрын
Although the concept of a large naval battle such as this is totally within the scopes of naval warfare, betting the Koreans and Japanese to fight the Chinese would be far away from reality. The ROKN and JMSDF are oriented on coastal defense rather than moving into open water. This is why JGSDF and ROKA operates ground-based anti-ship missiles.
@itzyaboimemez2074Ай бұрын
😎 Su 33 next?
@funkytownjedi11 ай бұрын
- Even if Su33 comes out, it won't change much.
  @milsimk10 ай бұрын
- @@milsimkcab you do a russian atampt at push8ng the northen fleet through the bering strait
  @jaycentoret28668 ай бұрын
Why not show missile😊 function at target
@chrisnewport7826Ай бұрын
Who is the winner
@m.nurravipujahadiyuono511410 ай бұрын
- This video is one of the long series. The story goes on.
  @milsimk10 ай бұрын
5:36 The Japanese Maritime Defence Force probably remembered that China always loses a naval battle anytime they fight Japan so they were supper confident
@AdrielMichael-xo2hdАй бұрын
Who is the winner 🙏🙏🙏❤️❤️🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩😀🙏🙏
@princessdeliabautista74989 ай бұрын
- The winner hasn't been decided yet. This is one of the long series.
  @milsimk9 ай бұрын
15:16 K-Yakhont 😊
@lukejohnston46664 ай бұрын
Cheaper to use guns?
@chrisnewport7826Ай бұрын
- Compared to missiles, yes.
  @milsimkАй бұрын
❤ B
@JackriAhmad2 ай бұрын
I hope this is real hahaha
@paulmangrobang45879 ай бұрын
No funcionan los subtítulos... canceló mi subscripción
@acabelloddcabelloduchement8629Ай бұрын
- Try using Auto-translate. You can use it by pressing Settings.
  @milsimkАй бұрын
We will. we just need to take the gloves off.
@spidertazzfb479 ай бұрын
J20 just like tofu striking a rock f35
@nguliongkwong6886 ай бұрын
- It is unlikely that j-20 will have an upper hand in the air battle against f-35. There is a big difference in stealth performance, detection performance, and missile performance.
  @milsimk5 ай бұрын
- @@milsimktaking into account size and engine performance, I would include kinematic performance as an F-35 advantage, also.
  @brionjohnson29854 ай бұрын
- Don't play any more simulated battle ..show the real one...
  @GeronimoBoloАй бұрын