Su 75 Checkmate - Russia's INSANE New Fighter Jet! - Better than the F-35?

2021 ж. 1 Қыр.
1 755 207 Рет қаралды

Video Sponsored by Ridge Wallet. Check them out here: ridge.com/FNE
Use Code “FNE” for 10% off your order.
My New Podcast: • Electric Jets and the ...
Discord: / discord
New Channel: / @aviationstationyt
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @foundandexplained
The Cold War of the 20th century between the United States and the then Soviet Union may be over,
but a 21st century arms race continues at full speed ahead between the United States and Russian Federation.
The latter, now depleted of all its former Soviet republics, continues to be a thorn in the side of America’s military aviation industry and its allies.
It’s not by chance that Russia continues to use its famous May Day celebrations to show off its military might and hardware, much as the Soviets did back during the USSR days.
Like any military power, Russia makes a big song and dance of the unveiling of any new aircraft.
Such was the case with a new fighter jet that many aviation experts believe will be a direct competitor to the U.S.’s F-35 plane.
The plane comes with not one but two catchy nicknames, namely the Sukhoi LTS Screamer or LTS Sukhoi Checkmate. The Russians, rather wryly, refer to it simply as the ‘Checkmate’.
Let’s not forget that the Russians are chess masters bar none, so a plane dubbed that does command some of my attention…
Many have noted how the Sukhoi LTS Checkmate looks a lot like the Lockheed Martin-made F-35 stealth jet.
Similarities between Russia’s ‘Checkmate’ and America’s F-35 are particularly stark design-wise.
For example, like the F-35, the Russian Checkmate includes widely-splayed, split-angled tails, a narrow fuselage that houses a single engine, and large wings that are somewhat diamond-shaped.
However, rather than being a case of the Checkmate being a copy of the F-35, these similarities shouldn’t be too surprising. After all, any stealth aircraft is fundamentally constrained by the aerodynamic limitations imposed by having stealth features. One can only defy physics so much.
Further design features of the Checkmate include its cropped delta wing and moveable fins that act as ruddervators, which provide control on both the pitch and yaw axes.
Sharp-eyed analysts felt its most striking feature is its intake, designed as a chin inlet slung under and wrapped around the lower fuselage but with a still-flat underside.
The size of its wings suggest the plane could climb to 40,000 feet or higher, but of course being a … secret project… we don’t know for sure.
Weapon bays for two short-range air-to-air missiles are found at either side of the fuselage, with capacity for three longer-range weapons carried in the lower bay, as well as an internal gun.
The Checkmate can also carry weapons on external pylons for missions not requiring stealth.
The internal weapons bay is designed to carry both air-to-air and air-to-ground ordnance, including both infrared- and radar-guided air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground and anti-ship missiles, guided and unguided bombs
and unguided rockets.
In terms of weight, the plane’s maximum combat load is 7.4 tonnes, which includes a range of air-to-surface weaponry, with a maximum take-off weight or MTOW of approximately 18 tonnes.
As for speed, Rostec claims the plane can achieve Mach 1.8 and can fly supersonically without the use of afterburner,
with an 8G manoeuvring rate. Its powerplant would probably be the engine used to power the Su-57 twinjet.
The Sukhoi LTS Checkmate will have an open systems architecture, with an automated logistics system known as Matreshka, similar in functionality to the systems on the F-35.
Other features of the plane heralded by Rostec include that it will feature artificial intelligence or AI in some capacity, although to what extent and to what end that AI will be used in the aircraft remains, for now, unknown. However, AI will no doubt be used for the plane’s voice-control technology.
Speaking of AI, a Rostec spokesperson commented that both a two-seat manned version and an unmanned version of the Checkmate are being considered for development.
Leaving us to wonder if the future of Russia's airforce will be metal pilots.

Пікірлер
  • Special thanks to Ridge Wallet for jumping in to sponsor today's video. Gotta say, at first I didn't know what to expect but I was sold with just how compact the wallet is. if your in the market, they are best at what they do - get the titanium one cause its just so cool. ridge.com/FNE

    @FoundAndExplained@FoundAndExplained2 жыл бұрын
    • First reply :D

      @dillongamer1131@dillongamer11312 жыл бұрын
    • Making any video about Forward Sept wings?

      @LOSTTEMPLAR@LOSTTEMPLAR2 жыл бұрын
    • This is fake there is only 1 working model, the other crashed when being delivered. As I now there is no worries

      @rubenbezares2592@rubenbezares25922 жыл бұрын
    • There is only 1 working right now, the second crashed when the attempted to deliver it.

      @rubenbezares2592@rubenbezares25922 жыл бұрын
    • Dude, please learn to pronounce Sukhoi correctly....FFS Also your "unguided rockets" are flares. lol

      @edwardfletcher7790@edwardfletcher77902 жыл бұрын
  • The animation is reaching Mustard levels of quality

    @MikoyanGurevichMiG21@MikoyanGurevichMiG212 жыл бұрын
    • Mustard but upload frequently

      @nebunezz_r@nebunezz_r2 жыл бұрын
    • I am really curious to know which software its used to create such delicious models , do u by chance know which platform mustard uses ???

      @hchand02@hchand022 жыл бұрын
    • @@nebunezz_r not as high quality

      @thesupreme8062@thesupreme80622 жыл бұрын
    • @@hchand02 I thinks it's Blender. He told about it once =)

      @fridaycaliforniaa236@fridaycaliforniaa2362 жыл бұрын
    • @@fridaycaliforniaa236 thanks 🙏😊

      @hchand02@hchand022 жыл бұрын
  • Russia (as well as other vast countries) uses twin-engine fighter jets, as they have to cover long distances and -in case of emergency- the nearest airfield could be far away. Most other countries, though, prefer single-engine jet fighter, so the russians create a single-engine version of their own jets. It's an export-oriented plane, not a backbone of russian forces or something.

    @jimmyj1969@jimmyj19692 жыл бұрын
    • Pakistan

      @shimadwan8251@shimadwan82512 жыл бұрын
    • They have not dominated for only one century , whenever / wherever , in the long run/historically dominant ,as one civilization disappeared they rise with a new stronger , hence supremacy.

      @creator7583@creator75832 жыл бұрын
    • ur absoletely wright

      @lackofgravitation6458@lackofgravitation64582 жыл бұрын
    • Всё проще мой друг, дело в том что тяговооружённость у совковых двигателей низкая, по этому используют спаренные двигатели.😘 Два двигателя это не плюс, а всегда минус.

      @constantinemalkovich9089@constantinemalkovich90892 жыл бұрын
    • @@constantinemalkovich9089 Откуда ты такой не совковый взялся? Два двигателя Су-57 могут выдавать максимальную тягу на форсаже 38 тонн в секунду, тогда как у F-22 только около 32 тонн в секунду.

      @vladimirnikolskiy@vladimirnikolskiy2 жыл бұрын
  • The SU-75 is a ghost of a fighter, literally! Nobody’s ever seen it for real!

    @jamespseaman4136@jamespseaman41368 ай бұрын
    • propagranda, talk only no real fact

      @ttkh68thomas43@ttkh68thomas435 ай бұрын
    • @@ttkh68thomas43 Fun fact 75 in Su-75 is the amount of years it will take to make one

      @dudeski6548@dudeski65485 ай бұрын
    • Я вам больше скажу все знают о су 57 но мало кто знает про як 132 самый засекречиный самолёт РФ

      @user-zl8hp2xe7m@user-zl8hp2xe7m4 ай бұрын
    • because is a ghost, and Ghost don't exist. Try to fly one, see what happens.

      @driveramd12@driveramd124 ай бұрын
    • The United States cannot take down a squadron of the Checkmate or the Felon, because neither have the numbers for a squadron.

      @Church449@Church4494 ай бұрын
  • It's so stealthy that not even the Russian test pilots have ever seen it fly. It perfectly compliments the new Ilyushin super sonic cargo plane that can carry four tanks, and the clear plastic drones that were purpose built to hunt F-35s.

    @HB-C_U_L8R@HB-C_U_L8R Жыл бұрын
    • typical Americans who can't see their opponents do well, whats up with the lousy defense systems of America that can not compare with that of the Russians

      @randyeduo@randyeduo Жыл бұрын
    • It is the Russian approach to stealth The Su-57 also has the same approach, but because it is less stealthy it can be seen flying (very rare but sometimes happens)

      @JULIAN11.@JULIAN11. Жыл бұрын
    • calling the Su-57 even some what stealth is a reach, with no RAM (Radar Absorbant Material) and exposed bolts on the wing pannels. Yeah it's an approach but even their stealth fighter can't be made in quantity or even with good quality. let alone the fact that it's radar cross section would be embarrassing to miss.

      @silver_css3734@silver_css3734 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@silver_css3734 It has the RCS of a clean F/A-18 Super Hornet; so about ~1m² At best, is a low observable 4.5 generation fighter, or a very bad 5th generation fighter The thing doesn't even have functional missile bays... functional for a (theatrically) 5th generation fighter (It is basically the same as a WW2 bomber, not pressurized), so asking it to be as stealthy as any other modern aircraft is kind of asking for too much

      @JULIAN11.@JULIAN11. Жыл бұрын
    • Sarsasm...😂

      @hanumharkit1485@hanumharkit148511 ай бұрын
  • It's made for export. The official trailer for it has pilots from all major non-Western markets being called to witness it.

    @hermannabt8361@hermannabt83612 жыл бұрын
    • Its not made, not yet. This is just a sales pitch.

      @algirdas6012@algirdas60122 жыл бұрын
    • India is not buying ngl

      @strikeeagle3159@strikeeagle31592 жыл бұрын
    • It’s going to be trash. I mean fine for selling around the world but won’t beat F35 or older F22 raptor. Or f16 or f15 for that matter.

      @danielvandermerwe7921@danielvandermerwe79212 жыл бұрын
    • @@danielvandermerwe7921 agree russsia dosent have enough cpiital to devlop

      @strikeeagle3159@strikeeagle31592 жыл бұрын
    • @@danielvandermerwe7921 insane agenda 🤣 overrated us

      @-VinhKhang_yearsago@-VinhKhang_yearsago2 жыл бұрын
  • The extraordinary claims regarding price, range, combat capabilities, delivery targets, etc.: I'll believe it when I see it

    @MiserableJosephson@MiserableJosephson2 жыл бұрын
    • If only the US followed that advice when they funded the F-35

      @RubenStim@RubenStim2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Shrew_King It's just an onboard Alexa lol.

      @namyx_71@namyx_712 жыл бұрын
    • it all depends on sales so tbh i believe russian can do it

      @ronidude@ronidude2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Shrew_King They mention many buzzwords. ;o)

      @michalpavlat3943@michalpavlat39432 жыл бұрын
    • Not necessarily a dig at Russia, I'd be sceptical of anyone making such extraordinary claims

      @MiserableJosephson@MiserableJosephson2 жыл бұрын
  • Looks suspiciously similar to the X-32 Ugly Duckling.

    @luther0013@luther0013 Жыл бұрын
  • One important thing to consider is by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production, the NGAD 6th gen will be as well. Personally, I do not see that as a "Checkmate".

    @VirusVanquisher@VirusVanquisher10 ай бұрын
    • That's assuming that the Su-75 ever even makes it out of the design stage, let alone prototyping / testing. The NATO reporting name for this thing should be the Su-75 Fantasy, or Su-75 Fictional.

      @stickiedmin6508@stickiedmin6508Ай бұрын
  • I just get the feeling that this is a modern, single seat, single engine multi role fighter bomber intended to be sold to Russia's Allies and Countries that operate Russian aircraft to replace old end of life Mig-21's, Mig-23's, mig-27's, and Su-22's.

    @Anlushac11@Anlushac112 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, only UAE ins't known as Russian ally and operator of Migs and Su

      @S1lverarrow@S1lverarrow2 жыл бұрын
    • The MIg-21 will never be end of life!

      @gordonlawrence1448@gordonlawrence14482 жыл бұрын
    • Srbijaaaaa👋

      @nemanjic2864@nemanjic28642 жыл бұрын
    • Good option for India to buy these planes in future to replace Old depleting Fighter jets like Mig 21 n Jaguars. 😎👍👏👏👌

      @shashwatmukherjee6301@shashwatmukherjee63012 жыл бұрын
    • you mean iran exactly

      @arianmokhtariha4664@arianmokhtariha46642 жыл бұрын
  • I think Russian jets look cooler, because of colour choice

    @ShinGojira54@ShinGojira542 жыл бұрын
    • Russian jet colors are mostly localized, though they've been trying a similar simple two-tone color on some of their 35 (both Flanker & Fulcrum). America has a lot of customers on all hemispheres, so they opt to have the simple grey paint that should blend in most skies.

      @TheRibbonRed@TheRibbonRed2 жыл бұрын
    • The black bird looks the best

      @progressivelibertarianview8832@progressivelibertarianview88322 жыл бұрын
    • Same

      @dylanwhite3383@dylanwhite33832 жыл бұрын
    • I also love how they blend curves into angles.

      @Invalidar@Invalidar2 жыл бұрын
    • But SU75 looks shit,I like SU57 more

      @ankurhaldar8836@ankurhaldar88362 жыл бұрын
  • All very impressive, but the SA-32 Thunderbolt Starfury is capable of reaching orbit and operating as a space superiority fighter, as well as being armed with four advanced plasma pulse cannons and has hardpoints for up to ten additional weapons. It's also every bit as real as the SU-75.

    @Werrf1@Werrf1 Жыл бұрын
    • It will also fire the “SuperZircon” missile, which flies at roughly light speed and has a KyberCrystal warhead, which can destroy a whole planet. Ask the citizens of Alderaan how real this weapon is…

      @mandoreforger6999@mandoreforger699911 ай бұрын
    • ​@@mandoreforger6999😂😂😂

      @zerosteel0123@zerosteel012310 ай бұрын
    • Strictly speaking the SA-32 "Thunderbolt" is a transatmospheric air and space superiority fighter capable of force projection as far as jump gates are available due to its only limitation being a lack of jumpdrive.

      @stephenkolostyak4087@stephenkolostyak40879 ай бұрын
    • @@stephenkolostyak4087 haven't heard of the MiG 41 yet, eh?

      @zerosteel0123@zerosteel01239 ай бұрын
    • Which sci fi movie was that in?

      @russellk.bonney8534@russellk.bonney85348 ай бұрын
  • Ironically, It will be checkmated by other aircrafts very easily

    @yuuyjaaj6721@yuuyjaaj6721 Жыл бұрын
    • Give me proof mr.bias

      @user-gz2pv2jn6o@user-gz2pv2jn6oАй бұрын
  • These kinda videos about Russian air superiority didn't really age well...

    @uhhi6693@uhhi66932 жыл бұрын
    • How?!

      @ncc1701218@ncc17012182 жыл бұрын
    • @@ncc1701218 because Russia can't achieve it.

      @mikewade777@mikewade777 Жыл бұрын
    • @@mikewade777 Do you have Russia today in your country?

      @ncc1701218@ncc1701218 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ncc1701218 you should try a channel that isn't bullshitting you.

      @mikewade777@mikewade777 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ncc1701218 wow you're only source that russia Inst making a complete ass of itself is its own propaganda channel. And everyone knows that russia can't afford to build these new vehicles to a scale that would be effective. Why do you think we haven't seen the t14 armada in Ukraine?

      @clappednbroke@clappednbroke Жыл бұрын
  • "Can be flown by A.I." Alright, someone get the ace combat protagonists, we gonna need them

    @LuixWalkingDead21@LuixWalkingDead212 жыл бұрын
    • nice

      @gabrielepierige8151@gabrielepierige81512 жыл бұрын
    • i remember that there is a film where a new prototype of plane that was controled by an AI(american) was added to a squad and started to fly by himself

      @philippey4918@philippey49182 жыл бұрын
    • @@philippey4918 It was called Stealth, its kinda meh, but it did have some nice cgi dogfight scenes for the time

      @LuixWalkingDead21@LuixWalkingDead212 жыл бұрын
    • Russia cant even get spare part to their computers

      @ulrichkristensen4087@ulrichkristensen4087 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ulrichkristensen4087 ROFL neither can anyone else. VID 0ne nein really messed thing up globally. Supplies are kinda meh even in the US.

      @Eluderatnight@Eluderatnight Жыл бұрын
  • It's August 2023 now. But still no records of a Test Flight for the Su-75 Checkmate...

    @dontran391@dontran3918 ай бұрын
    • February 2024 (or January 31st for some people) Where checkmate test flight?

      @murkywateradminssions5219@murkywateradminssions52193 ай бұрын
    • the worst thing is that im not even surprised, i quickly realized why people call the su75 fe_boy

      @ninjacat5135@ninjacat513519 күн бұрын
  • this plane is so stealthy no one has ever seen it and no one ever will

    @IrishCaesar@IrishCaesar Жыл бұрын
    • funniest american

      @VivaVenezuelaa@VivaVenezuelaa Жыл бұрын
    • My guy the plane is sill in the testing face the first prototype will be made in 2024 to 2025.

      @verdorrenstudios@verdorrenstudios11 ай бұрын
    • @@verdorrenstudios no it won't hahahahhahaha not with all these sanctions. Russia can't make its own complex electronics and absolutely cannot match the west in precision and electronics. Have you seen the Su-57? Unshielded compressor blades, fucking exposed screws and indents on the wings. No shot is that a stealth fighter

      @IrishCaesar@IrishCaesar11 ай бұрын
    • why yall taking this man so seriously

      @hospital3568@hospital356811 ай бұрын
    • @@hospital3568 Cause there saying that not even a model of the plane would even be made.

      @verdorrenstudios@verdorrenstudios11 ай бұрын
  • I'm sure this thing will be as highly successful as the T-14 Armata main battle tank...

    @thomasnewcomb2079@thomasnewcomb2079 Жыл бұрын
    • They've produced like 10 of them in 10 years.

      @Darkpara1@Darkpara1 Жыл бұрын
    • lol I have a feeling you are correct.

      @rvsonthelevel8746@rvsonthelevel8746 Жыл бұрын
    • Wow funny come up with something new kid.

      @floppi7098@floppi709811 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Darkpara1source? It's top secret info for the Russian defence circles so you as an arrogant teen have no hope of knowing them yet

      @matitjamatheson4395@matitjamatheson439510 ай бұрын
    • This comment didn't age well. How are those leopard tanks and Bradley's doing now? 😂😂😂

      @zerosteel0123@zerosteel012310 ай бұрын
  • The comment section of this video will be...interesting. *Throws popcorn in the microwave*

    @rahbaralhaq@rahbaralhaq2 жыл бұрын
    • The entire section is going to be "'Murica YeeHaw!!".

      @thedamnedatheist@thedamnedatheist2 жыл бұрын
    • This is where the fun begins🤣✌

      @shaider1982@shaider19822 жыл бұрын
    • Take a look at the America and Russia fanboys arguing.

      @545x39mmRound@545x39mmRound2 жыл бұрын
    • Throws a ridge wallet to the popcorn. "Not on my watch, comrade". LOL

      @Gunni1972@Gunni19722 жыл бұрын
    • FACT

      @kevineldracher9422@kevineldracher94222 жыл бұрын
  • as the missle said, the 75 in the su-75 is the amount of years it will take for Sukhoi to make a proper stealth fighter.

    @ricefarmer_1152@ricefarmer_11528 ай бұрын
    • Hollywood is taking its toll on you my friend

      @badi95toinfinity@badi95toinfinity8 ай бұрын
    • and even tho the 75 is suppossed to be stealth it still uses the IRS dome... which is literally a fucking lighthouse on a radar... meaning its stealth capability is shit... and it doesnt even exist...

      @vitsobotka6268@vitsobotka62688 ай бұрын
    • @@badi95toinfinity wow wow look whos talking, filled with russian propagannda. Here's a fact, Russia's military is in such a bad state that even though its the second strongest army it cant even defeat ukraine

      @ricefarmer_1152@ricefarmer_11528 ай бұрын
    • @@badi95toinfinity also your ass fails to realize that su 57, the apparent russian 5th gen aircraft only has 21 aircraft, and only 11 of those are in service and it took over 40 years for it to enter service, developed 1975, in service 2020 . Whilst the f-35 started development in 1995 and first entered service in 2015, thats 25 full years faster than the su 57 annd it already has over 1000 aircraft in service. So your dumbass needs to wake up and understand that without other buyers russia does not have the capabilities or the requried technology that can rival the US's

      @ricefarmer_1152@ricefarmer_11528 ай бұрын
    • India backed out of a potential deal with the SU57, due to technical failures and engine malfunctions. Not what was promised to them.. since no one is lining up to purchase the 57 its program is a failure.. checkmate my a** 😂

      @buggyman286@buggyman2868 ай бұрын
  • Let's see if the Sukhoi Su-73 "Checkmate" can counter an AIM-120 AMRAAM, assuming that wooden mock-up ever gets off the ground.

    @enbygaming5996@enbygaming5996 Жыл бұрын
    • Ur father is prob as stealthy as ur fave jet “F22 raptor”

      @lucapanfil2572@lucapanfil25728 ай бұрын
    • @@lucapanfil2572 At least I have one.

      @enbygaming5996@enbygaming59968 ай бұрын
    • @@enbygaming5996 well y do u never see him? Is it his stealth tech

      @lucapanfil2572@lucapanfil25728 ай бұрын
    • ​@@lucapanfil2572never see him? Russian bots are funny

      @RogueSkull@RogueSkullАй бұрын
    • @@RogueSkull Shiver me timbers an ai pfp user.

      @lucapanfil2572@lucapanfil2572Ай бұрын
  • If Russia is selling this plane to it's trading partners, it's not that much of a threat to the US.

    @texasman1836@texasman18362 жыл бұрын
    • You can say this for the F35 too, But the export models of weapons are always second best, no one sells their best everyone expects this, but whatever we only know what They want us to know more likely what their adversary knows n zero more

      @polygamous1@polygamous12 жыл бұрын
    • Just a way to make money, not a threat.

      @alwayscensored6871@alwayscensored68712 жыл бұрын
    • We should have sold the USSR millions of first generation Ford Pintos. The Cold War could've ended 15 years earlier!

      @rickrudd@rickrudd2 жыл бұрын
    • The f35 was made to fill requirements by the us military and serve as an export platform for their allies. As far as I know, the Russian military didn’t ask for this and may not ever buy it. This is made entirely by the company with intention to export. In some regard it is competition as export products but in reality the customers would be different. US and Russia tend to sell to different countries.

      @Heat3YT2@Heat3YT22 жыл бұрын
    • South America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia excluding Japan and maybe South Korea. Sounds like a big enough market.

      @hermannabt8361@hermannabt83612 жыл бұрын
  • I seem to recall a certain saying- ‘believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see’ It’s not like they’d admit to being behind.

    @IAmTheAce5@IAmTheAce52 жыл бұрын
    • This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the Poseidon nuclear torpedo. Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.

      @SmotritelMayaka29@SmotritelMayaka292 жыл бұрын
    • @@SmotritelMayaka29 I wonder if the horror is more to the point than the actual functionality, though

      @IAmTheAce5@IAmTheAce52 жыл бұрын
    • @@SmotritelMayaka29 A nuclear torpedo is not big deal to develop, a fifth gen fighter in the other hand...

      @ThePowerLover@ThePowerLover2 жыл бұрын
    • IF IT FLIES within 5 years, they are ahead of the F-35. At least from a technological perspective, as they use tech of today, not from 20 years ago. Again: IF IT FLIES.

      @Gunni1972@Gunni19722 жыл бұрын
    • @@Gunni1972 But Russian tech is like 15-20 years behind!

      @ThePowerLover@ThePowerLover2 жыл бұрын
  • Russia: This new plane will change everything. We will dominate the skies. Also Russia: We can only afford to make one… out of wood.

    @JG54206@JG542067 ай бұрын
    • The practice of the war in Syria, Georgia and Ukraine has shown that the bastards escape even from wooden Russian planes.

      @MrTaramka@MrTaramka5 ай бұрын
    • And dry wall screw's :)

      @Retardando@Retardando4 ай бұрын
    • ​@@MrTaramkaya don't forget america lost against fucking farmers in Vietnam and they did not do shit in Korea and they lost in Afghanistan plus ukraine for Russia is going well they are already destroying Abrams and many other nato tanks.

      @user-gz2pv2jn6o@user-gz2pv2jn6oАй бұрын
  • Given current events I'd be shocked if this jet ever flies

    @8bitfrenzy376@8bitfrenzy376 Жыл бұрын
    • Про Авангард Пересвет насколько я помню говорили мультики Путина сейчас не смешно

      @user-zl8hp2xe7m@user-zl8hp2xe7m4 ай бұрын
    • WhAT events?

      @ojjoooooo@ojjoooooo4 ай бұрын
  • Su-75 is an aircraft that surpasses other current 5th gen stealth category fighters by a wide margin: not only its stealth, it even does not exist!!;)

    @letecmig@letecmig2 жыл бұрын
    • It does exist but its still in prototype up for display it wont be released until 2023

      @NotLRK@NotLRK2 жыл бұрын
    • @@NotLRK its not a prototype. Its cardboard mockup

      @letecmig@letecmig2 жыл бұрын
    • @@NotLRK Sure buddy. The onboard computer will probably run on Windows Vista.

      @rick7424@rick74242 жыл бұрын
    • I just made a aircraft to surpass it. It's called the Gfjsye-2548362819643 but no one can see it, top secret

      @kousand9917@kousand9917 Жыл бұрын
    • why do americans hate russia so much..? I dont care who is better, this plane is beautiful and I think it will eventually make it to the skies. instead of hating let's try to compete and make better machines, if history thought us something, the most powerful nations always fall while in denial of not being the best anymore.

      @jhonedoe3734@jhonedoe3734 Жыл бұрын
  • The F35 isn't a superiority fight, but a multirole fight.

    @collins3D@collins3D2 жыл бұрын
    • it shows how shitty your aircraft is when you have to compare a superiority fighter to a strike aircraft 😂

      @jamesmaddison4546@jamesmaddison454611 ай бұрын
    • Also a good submarine

      @zerosteel0123@zerosteel012310 ай бұрын
    • @@zerosteel0123A submarine that can fly, is being sold globally, and isn’t a riveted together wooden mockup piece of shit like the last two Russian aircraft.

      @KD-wl3fk@KD-wl3fk9 ай бұрын
    • @@KD-wl3fk 😂😂😂 you guys are funny. Interesting seeing western equipment getting shredded and blown to bits right now. I guess you guys aren't so tough after all.

      @zerosteel0123@zerosteel01239 ай бұрын
    • @@zerosteel0123 Wow, 2 leopards and a couple of M-2’s get destroyed and you guys are shocked? Its war dumbass, stuff will get destroyed. Whats about the mountains and mountains of T-72’s, T-80’s, BMP-1/2’s, and other Russian equipment that has been shredded by basic Javelins and TOW missiles? Does that mean the Russian Army is completely useless? Wait till NATO actually shows up, because you guys will be on your knees begging for forgiveness when your entire air-force is grounded and we are on the doorstep of Saint Petersburg within 48 hours.

      @KD-wl3fk@KD-wl3fk9 ай бұрын
  • USA should be really afraid of those who made this high quality CGI animation

    @alexmay3533@alexmay3533 Жыл бұрын
  • This video is 2 years old and the plane has still never flown.

    @kevinfogle7929@kevinfogle79295 ай бұрын
  • I seriously doubt the US is Afraid of the SU75 sounds like a click bait title to me.

    @leeadams5941@leeadams59412 жыл бұрын
    • Normal when you are KZheadr ...that's paid advert

      @elpafishing@elpafishing2 жыл бұрын
    • You are free to think whatever your doubt doesn't change anything 😜

      @DSM85986@DSM859862 жыл бұрын
    • At USD40 million a piece it just worth it

      @wishfulguy4819@wishfulguy48192 жыл бұрын
    • @@DSM85986 we're really not scared of an imaginary jet

      @Just_A_Random_Desk@Just_A_Random_Desk2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Just_A_Random_Desk to me been on your bed for sure you are not but those who will really face it does your response is equally as of my grandmother

      @DSM85986@DSM859862 жыл бұрын
  • For the record, that weapons diagram was for the F-18, not the F-16.

    @erfquake1@erfquake12 жыл бұрын
  • “Go 2 times the speed of light…” yeah sure

    @albernard8751@albernard8751 Жыл бұрын
  • The hawker tempest that will come out in 2032 as the new eurofighter looks a lot like the f22 raptor

    @alfiebutterworth-cu4ys@alfiebutterworth-cu4ys9 ай бұрын
  • In Russia you don’t play chess with chess pieces *You play with fighter jets*

    @captain_commenter8796@captain_commenter87962 жыл бұрын
    • With fighter jets that exist only as anímations!

      @tombrunila2695@tombrunila26952 жыл бұрын
    • @@tombrunila2695 And, this video is ruined.

      @545x39mmRound@545x39mmRound2 жыл бұрын
    • @@tombrunila2695 the truth

      @richardsears4665@richardsears46652 жыл бұрын
    • @@tombrunila2695 damn people really hate russian developments, yet they hype the american FA-XX so much (which even the animation itself doesnt exist yet) lmao. cant you just take the joke without having to despise russia?

      @user-xj9lp3fs7m@user-xj9lp3fs7m2 жыл бұрын
    • @@user-xj9lp3fs7m, the only stuff that is being hyped is Soviet/Russia weapons! They are all supposed to be vastly superior, but when the shooting starts they prove to have been expensive targets! And then comes the claim that the Soviet Union or Russia had delivered substandard "export" versions of the weapons to their most important clients! NEVER is there even a hint of that before the shooting starts. Before the claim is that these super weapons will make mince meat out of Western weapons! And this "new" Russian fighter is a copy of what Northrop had developed nearly 30th years ago!

      @tombrunila2695@tombrunila26952 жыл бұрын
  • In the Checkmates glossy ad they used an image of a RAF 617 Squadron F-35 patch, someone in Russia didn't do their research properly 🤣🤣

    @TheNinjaGinger@TheNinjaGinger Жыл бұрын
  • Ah yes, the wooden mockup with a double chin for an air intake

    @carlosadriandelgadoolsen1945@carlosadriandelgadoolsen19459 ай бұрын
  • What I seem to notice about the eastern block is that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation has really good designs and concepts for military equipment, but lack funding and proper engineering know-how to successfully make them function as they were internet

    @abeliniguez9705@abeliniguez9705 Жыл бұрын
    • Lack of funding? More like politicians went stealing spree

      @hehe-jg8zz@hehe-jg8zz Жыл бұрын
    • @@hehe-jg8zz and that is definitely true, but at the end of it they would lack the funds

      @abeliniguez9705@abeliniguez9705 Жыл бұрын
    • Soviet union doesn't exist, but the russian spirit is great. Theyre starting to build their funding back up after the past destruction of the country.

      @jeremyr7147@jeremyr7147 Жыл бұрын
    • @@jeremyr7147 hopefully they can pick themselves back up after this, it’d be interesting to see what comes up from the most resilient people on earth

      @abeliniguez9705@abeliniguez9705 Жыл бұрын
    • Yup, the best plane in the world means nothing if you can't afford to build and maintain it.

      @MrM0nKey79@MrM0nKey79 Жыл бұрын
  • It's pretty similar to the Boeing X-32B, just less stealthy and I remember when Russia said that the TU-144 was better than the Concorde

    @Then.72@Then.722 жыл бұрын
    • It is

      @eliasziad7864@eliasziad7864 Жыл бұрын
    • @@eliasziad7864 except the Concorde was much more reliable than the TU-144, the Concorde could supercruise at Mach 2 while the Tupolev couldn't, the passenger cabin in the Concorde was as quiet as a normal airliner while the TU-144's was so noisy that passengers had to pass notes to each other, The Concorde had a brilliant safety record apart from a crash that was caused by tire debris from another aircraft while the TU-144 had 226 failures during 102 flights. The only thing the Tupolev beat the Concorde at was speed

      @Jusuff@Jusuff Жыл бұрын
    • Fake Russia military is outdated and old

      @josephmana8972@josephmana8972 Жыл бұрын
    • @@josephmana8972 Same for US army...

      @eliasziad7864@eliasziad7864 Жыл бұрын
    • @@eliasziad7864your third world country can't even compete against us y'all weak and poor and outdated

      @josephmana8972@josephmana8972 Жыл бұрын
  • I'll start thinking about being worried about the "Checkmate" when it actually flies.

    @FlightSimHistorian@FlightSimHistorian2 жыл бұрын
    • Twenty years from now.....

      @spikymikie@spikymikie2 жыл бұрын
    • For now its just a 10-move setup...

      @xiaoxiagao1254@xiaoxiagao12542 жыл бұрын
    • When it flies, Covid-19 probably wiped out human being

      @Chris58851@Chris588512 жыл бұрын
    • Lockheed Martin working on the FR-72.

      @chattyknight9559@chattyknight95592 жыл бұрын
    • This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the "Poseidon nuclear torpedo"(Status-6). Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.

      @SmotritelMayaka29@SmotritelMayaka292 жыл бұрын
  • Su 75 the "stealth fighter" with a double chin

    @drbear2029@drbear2029 Жыл бұрын
  • Calling it the ‘Checkmate’ really shows how far the Russians are trying to stretch the idea this concept art of a plane is high tech.

    @thelouster5815@thelouster58158 ай бұрын
    • They have had a history of hyping up their Aircraft. Must be a communist thing since China does it too.

      @michaelmichaelagnew8503@michaelmichaelagnew85034 ай бұрын
  • Finally Sukhoi provided data about how the new Su 75 can easily destroy an F-35... A Tu 95 loaded with all blueprints and promises of this marvellous plane should have to fly above an airport where there is at least an F-35 landed in the middle of the parking range, very visible. Then the Tupolev -95 would make a landing crash on the F-35...

    @elbeiser@elbeiser Жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @laynestaley4957@laynestaley4957 Жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

      @aandradejr213@aandradejr2134 ай бұрын
  • The U.S has already produced this tech 30 years ago with F22 and F35 and has been operating both while Russia is just getting started. The U.S is already moving on toward Gen 6 fighters.

    @onebridge7231@onebridge7231 Жыл бұрын
    • I hope our new fighter program produces something dope. I saw the design they unveiled. It looks awesome

      @McGriddy51095@McGriddy51095 Жыл бұрын
    • F-35 неудача сплошная, а насчёт того, кто у кого ещё копирует это надо посмотреть) натырили чертежи в 90х, радуйтесь, что хоть что-то смогли построить, и то не все...

      @user-xg4dw8wq1p@user-xg4dw8wq1p Жыл бұрын
    • The Check mate looks pretty neat, its just kinda useless considering its first flight is estimated to be in the mid 2020s and the US is trying to press its first 6 Gen fighter into service by the early 2030s...

      @laynestaley4957@laynestaley4957 Жыл бұрын
    • Technically 40, the F-117 first flew in 1981.

      @pyronuke4768@pyronuke4768 Жыл бұрын
    • It isn't intended for the same market. China will be their main competition.

      @baronvonlimbourgh1716@baronvonlimbourgh1716 Жыл бұрын
  • They will leave a special blank spot on the dash for pilots to mount their commercial GPS units on the 3 production units they will take 18 years to build.

    @datatebo7863@datatebo7863 Жыл бұрын
  • If you think this is impressive, the Roc, the Phoenix and the Thunderbird fly as well as an SU-75 and are just as real.

    @vapoet@vapoet7 ай бұрын
  • “AFRAID” is the perfect choice word for clickbait but that’s about it.

    @spitfirekid1@spitfirekid12 жыл бұрын
    • From the end of the video, it seemed like he was talking about defense contractors being afraid it would take sales away from the f35, which seems reasonable if it is developed quickly and at near the proposed price.

      @johnathanclayton2887@johnathanclayton28872 жыл бұрын
    • Scared for a virtual jet....hihihi

      @alexdias8627@alexdias86272 жыл бұрын
    • Su 57 only 12 units and 2 crash so only 10 now Su 75 ? J 20 has 150 units so far J 31 only 5 units so far F 35 has 500 units worldwide so far ... You decide....kkkk

      @alexdias8627@alexdias86272 жыл бұрын
    • @@johnathanclayton2887 30 million dollars is impossible for russia becouse its the same price as j 10 from china Su 75 is like 70 million dollars for reality check not a virtual one....

      @alexdias8627@alexdias86272 жыл бұрын
    • Su 35 is 65 million to 85 million dollars to buy so a new jet is not 30 million dollars its ridiculous....

      @alexdias8627@alexdias86272 жыл бұрын
  • Interesting aircraft. In theory, it has very good specs. We’ll see how it all eventuates over coming years of testing.

    @PaulStewartAviation@PaulStewartAviation2 жыл бұрын
    • Russia can't afford this project

      @jamesmcgee1566@jamesmcgee15662 жыл бұрын
    • @Tylon Holmes lol i love the derailing topic. this isn't about healthcare, Russian healthcare is awful too but unlike russia us can afford 800+ jets without its economy collapsing,

      @tophatv2902@tophatv29022 жыл бұрын
    • @@tophatv2902 Естественно при таких бюджетах они очень хотят воевать(я про США), и Россия при бюджете в несколько раз меньше всё равно обходит США в некоторых структурах. При таких бюджетах, которые США выделяет на армию в год можно было бы уже медицину бесплатной сделать. Но нет, США будет говорить о том, что им нужна мощная армия на триллионы долларов. Я очень люблю, когда сравнивают Страны по количеству танков самолётов и т.п. Ну много у вас самолётов, молодцы. Системам ПВО России хотяб разогреться дадите.

      @Blackholee-kc4op@Blackholee-kc4op2 жыл бұрын
    • @@Blackholee-kc4op those air defeenses are gettting rekt by some dudes with bayraktars

      @vignasimp2835@vignasimp28352 жыл бұрын
    • @@vignasimp2835 c400 or c500 or 550 ? no

      @Blackholee-kc4op@Blackholee-kc4op2 жыл бұрын
  • "The 75 in the name is the amount of years Sukhoi will need to make an actual stealth fighter, because they clearly don't know how to make one after the failure of the Su57. I see you over there, don't try and sneak up on me." - Tym3 Glitch

    @radosbarner1734@radosbarner1734 Жыл бұрын
  • This is a 4.5 generation fighter. The IR done is still round making it highly reflective to radar.

    @DarkRendition@DarkRendition8 ай бұрын
  • The Checkmate looks like if you combined the XF-23 and the XF-32

    @khylesamuelkimmelanio688@khylesamuelkimmelanio688 Жыл бұрын
    • and look at the cockpit of YF-23 and on the wings of YF-22 and compare this to su-57, its simular right? maybe the only original things of su-57 are engines

      @michalc1018@michalc1018 Жыл бұрын
    • @@michalc1018 No! They‘ve stolen the engines from Star Wars or from some other Hollywood shit. I think the Russians have also stolen the english language but they reproduced it to cyrilic, that‘s why we don‘t understand it anymore. However, the first thing they‘ve stolen from the US was the Idea of people having a need to breath to stay alive. (Sarcasm)

      @neko1533@neko1533 Жыл бұрын
    • @@michalc1018 wait what- are you trying to say Su-57 is a copy of...........what the fu- nope not at all doesn't look simular at all

      @BlackPhantom_II@BlackPhantom_II8 ай бұрын
    • @@BlackPhantom_II Even IF, it couldn't be a "copy". More like a Mash-up, and if someone could pull that off, Congratulations. You solved the "what if"-problem, in Aircraft construction.

      @Gunni1972@Gunni19725 ай бұрын
    • YF?

      @cellokid5104@cellokid51043 ай бұрын
  • It looks like they combined features that the suits and stockholders in the military opted out of (YF-23 and X-32/F-32). Will be interesting to see what it's capable of.

    @bengonzales1182@bengonzales1182 Жыл бұрын
    • Yes that's what I thought

      @legofighterjets541@legofighterjets541 Жыл бұрын
    • russia found another way to copy homework but not be like china

      @HELaughsJRS@HELaughsJRS Жыл бұрын
    • It’ll be capable of collecting dust seeing as it’s made of wood 💀

      @DiamondSquidy@DiamondSquidy Жыл бұрын
    • @@DiamondSquidy I'm sure it also burns well if they store the wooden mockup indoors

      @ambassadorofreee3859@ambassadorofreee385910 ай бұрын
    • @@ambassadorofreee3859 yeah the only modern jet that’s a cigaret butt away from being deleted from history 😭

      @DiamondSquidy@DiamondSquidy10 ай бұрын
  • Russia has only enough money to make animations of cool planes.

    @wabash1975@wabash1975 Жыл бұрын
  • Give me a break, the felon is held together by deck screws and caulking

    @daddyj2030@daddyj2030 Жыл бұрын
  • F-35 doesn’t have the highest thrust-to-weight ratio, but its engine sure as hell does. If they can’t beat that, they’ll just have a cool-looking fighter that still needs to hang stores externally.

    @2IDSGT@2IDSGT2 жыл бұрын
    • On empty weight, F-35A Block 3F's T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50/52's. F-35A has an active engine upgrade program.

      @valenrn8657@valenrn86572 жыл бұрын
    • The F35 is actually underpowered they have a newer engine in development.

      @graham1996@graham19962 жыл бұрын
    • @@graham1996 false, For empty weight, F-35A T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50's. You haven't normalised the range between the two aircraft design.

      @valenrn8657@valenrn86572 жыл бұрын
    • @@graham1996 The basic wing loading without body and vortex lift. F-35A Empty weight: 29,300 lb Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. There's a reason for the engine upgrade program. F-35A's 45,000 lbf thrust upgrade road map is 1.57X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. F-35A needs at least 44,330 lbs thrust to preserve 1.55X scale factor There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C to F-35A on basic wing loading, engine thrust, and empty weight. F-35A's wing area is influenced by weight growth and F-16C's empty weight wing loading target.

      @valenrn8657@valenrn86572 жыл бұрын
    • They are working to improve the F135 with 11% more range 10% more thurst and 50% better thermal management. To my knowledge though GE and RR are working on a next gen engine to possibility repower the F35 and 6 gen aircraft.

      @graham1996@graham19962 жыл бұрын
  • Little correction.. the MAKS Airshow is not every year, it is all two years.

    @swisstestpilot@swisstestpilot2 жыл бұрын
  • The United States Air Force is so much further advanced than anything Russia has. One advanced F-16 could take out multiple Russion aircraft and they wouldn't even see it coming.

    @jlunsford100@jlunsford100 Жыл бұрын
    • Cap brudda russia fighter jets have always impress everyone especially usa

      @Heythere12344@Heythere1234411 ай бұрын
    • lmao

      @younessbenaguida9895@younessbenaguida989510 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Heythere12344 according to Russia that is

      @magnuskain278@magnuskain2786 ай бұрын
    • You gonna get disappointed with F-16 performance in Ukraine

      @MT-rg4fn@MT-rg4fn5 ай бұрын
    • @@MT-rg4fn Put our F-16's in there with our pilots and our Air commanders and you will see the F-16 as anything but a disappointment. You will think it is the greatest aircraft ever made. First like we always do we will take out any possible way of yall being able to detect it on radar. But all that will probably start a new war.

      @michaelmichaelagnew8503@michaelmichaelagnew85034 ай бұрын
  • Yea I have a literal UFO flying saucer fighter that I built in my back yard. It has the ability to shoot down any enemy aircraft or vehicles, day or night, anywhere on Earth, while still taxing out of the hanger!!! It is completely invisible, on radar and optically, and emits no sound or heat whatsoever. It also has a fully functional recreation area for the crew, with everything from a spa to a gym, and a full kitchen with chef if they should feel peckish at any point. There's even ping pong and pool tables if the crew feels like a little competition, since they won't get any from the enemy. Of course it could do everything without the crew on board, but they just love being on board, and once inside, they're basically in the safest place on Earth, even during combat, because of its impenetrable force field. So even if you could see it, there's no type of weapon currently on Earth that could penetrate this force-field, including nuclear weapons. And best of all, it actually exists in exactly the same way this Russian aircraft exists!! So while this Su75 obviously does exist, just like my UFO, it would be like if an ant tried to attack an Abraham's Tank. It would not make much of a dent.

    @mierbeuker8148@mierbeuker81485 ай бұрын
  • The air inlet reminds me of the American x-32 when they tried air-2-air refueling the refueling thing headed for the massive air intake on the x-32, which was a little bit concerning for the pilot.

    @matthewbaynham6286@matthewbaynham62862 жыл бұрын
    • It just wanted to take a big sip

      @TornaitSuperBird@TornaitSuperBird5 ай бұрын
  • It looks pretty much PRECISELY like a 50/50 mix of Lockheed Martin and Boeing Prototypes. Pretty cool!

    @andreastauber5739@andreastauber57392 жыл бұрын
  • America: hey Russia we have the F-35 Russia: Oh yeah , we have Checkmate….on paper😂😂😂

    @AlexisLopez-pb8ms@AlexisLopez-pb8ms8 ай бұрын
  • Like virtually all Russian military equipment this jet is almost certainly given far more credit that it’s due

    @tb6376@tb6376 Жыл бұрын
    • Whatever

      @dionross1241@dionross1241 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dionross1241 😢😢😢😢 cry more

      @rizzzzzza4643@rizzzzzza4643 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dionross1241 Мат! Ukrainian for Checkmate!

      @dondarko7885@dondarko7885 Жыл бұрын
    • @@rizzzzzza4643 cry more ?

      @Zx17OPv57i@Zx17OPv57i Жыл бұрын
    • 😂as if the ones from nato aren't over hyped

      @sr71lockheed80@sr71lockheed80 Жыл бұрын
  • No offence, but some bragging the air superiority out of the US with RUS, I immediately thought of Vietnamese using 2 outdated subsonic Mig-17s vs F-4s or F-105s. Migs were always outnumbered by the US in 1:12 ratio , but managed to do so much damage to the US. You can have all the funny gadgets and AI, but pilots are pilots.

    @reisen1932@reisen19322 жыл бұрын
    • Shhh ….. , nobody who watches History Channel knows that….. 😏

      @socotroquito2007@socotroquito20072 жыл бұрын
    • Same as Israel six-day war, Israel also outnumbered by the arabs, it is about the pilots

      @nickkung8041@nickkung80412 жыл бұрын
    • pretty sure its about how you treat your enemies. ive seen many americans underestimating their opponents

      @user-xj9lp3fs7m@user-xj9lp3fs7m2 жыл бұрын
    • @Brian Roome either way the soviet tech indeed did many damage to the us back then (?)

      @user-xj9lp3fs7m@user-xj9lp3fs7m2 жыл бұрын
    • @Brian Roome 1:12 number ratio, 2:1 kill ratio means 1:6 of actual K/D rate, dude. Take some maths. Or in this case, can't swallow the truth against White Supremacist about "the US is invicible" arrogance, you could say.

      @huuduyvu9714@huuduyvu97142 жыл бұрын
  • The name of the fighter aircraft is "Checkmate". The word "Checkmate" originates from Persian "Shah Mat" meaning "King is helpless" and the game of Chess itself originated in India...So, judging by the name the main market for this aircraft will be India and Iran.

    @azimazim6806@azimazim6806 Жыл бұрын
    • well, Russia close friend undoubtable

      @02suraditpengsaeng41@02suraditpengsaeng41 Жыл бұрын
    • It’s not that deep

      @softdrink-0@softdrink-0 Жыл бұрын
  • "Can I copy your homework?" "Yeah, just don't make it obvious."

    @boogernights1@boogernights19 ай бұрын
  • These CGI fighter jets are looking better and better! The performance is just unbelievable.

    @almiromeragic9341@almiromeragic9341 Жыл бұрын
  • History is replete with high-flown concept planes that under-delivered...or, by the time the kinks in the system were worked out, their "cutting edge" technology was already obsolete. So, I'll worry about the Checkmate when it actually moves beyond 'flying prototype' and into actual production. Until then, it's a paper tiger.

    @AllTradesGeorge@AllTradesGeorge2 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, NATO outmatches Russia and the CSTO in every way.

      @jonblack3807@jonblack3807 Жыл бұрын
    • Same thing happened with the foxbat, they hyped it up so the USA made f-15 just for the foxbat to be a price of trash

      @chaseprobst7259@chaseprobst725910 ай бұрын
    • Kita bukti kn mlm ini

      @HasbiJaya-kq9ov@HasbiJaya-kq9ov9 ай бұрын
    • @AllTradesGeorge The checkmate isn't exactly "cutting edge" at this point. Not even for Russia. It's more like playing catchup with America, at least insofar as their military purpose aircraft exports are concerned.

      @hollowgonzalo4329@hollowgonzalo43296 ай бұрын
    • @@jonblack3807 Wishful thinking

      @MT-rg4fn@MT-rg4fn5 ай бұрын
  • Checkmate is a PRO level marketing move. Love it.

    @cyrilio@cyrilio2 жыл бұрын
    • Not really. Very amateurish.

      @covidhoax7646@covidhoax76462 жыл бұрын
    • . Hostile Pilot >

      @02suraditpengsaeng41@02suraditpengsaeng41 Жыл бұрын
    • Just like all the Russian Pros working in brothels worldwide.

      @gaoxiaen1@gaoxiaen111 ай бұрын
  • Pretty insane to build a cardboard mock-up and call it a plane actually.

    @wwlb4970@wwlb49705 ай бұрын
  • I always think this flightier is a perfect match with the Chinese up coming LHD 076, if the Russian mil-30 can be bk on track , then it might become a game changer.

    @et9953@et9953 Жыл бұрын
    • @et9953 Could be. It would maks a decent stopgap between some of the more outdated late Soviet 4th gen designs of the J-1X series and the more recent Chinese 5th gen stealth designs. That of course hinges on the assumption that Russia is capable of mass producing the thing and that it lives up to expectations.

      @hollowgonzalo4329@hollowgonzalo43296 ай бұрын
  • Hi, really like your video as usual. But I have noticed one little mistake. MAKS is not an annual airshow. It is organized every two years. Greetings from Russia :)

    @user-td6qk6rf2p@user-td6qk6rf2p2 жыл бұрын
    • I hope Su75 it sells like Mig21

      @shimadwan8251@shimadwan82512 жыл бұрын
    • @@shimadwan8251 if you havent realized. The Su-75 is technically a stealth Mig-21

      @flogger8413@flogger84132 жыл бұрын
    • @@flogger8413 lol i sure hope it's not any way like a MiG-21 those things drop like flies

      @mikailvito7200@mikailvito72002 жыл бұрын
  • I also drew a pretty impressive plane, I also wrote down some bad-ass specs. I call it the "draw-4".

    @sarcasmo57@sarcasmo572 жыл бұрын
    • But you don't have history of building real planes.

      @_Epsilon_@_Epsilon_2 жыл бұрын
    • )))

      @kakhaalibegashvili4077@kakhaalibegashvili40772 жыл бұрын
    • @@_Epsilon_ The SU-57 tells you all you need to know about Sukhoi's ability to deliver on the promise of amazing stealth tech, still not even a squadron of the fuckers out despite being worse than the Lightning II

      @windrose5988@windrose598810 ай бұрын
  • Too bad they can’t fund the project anymore except for the wooden mock-up model….also did anyone notice the striking similarities to the Boeing X32 prototype that lost to the F35?

    @portcybertryx222@portcybertryx22210 ай бұрын
  • Doesn't seem like a lot of exotic technologies. Not including finicky nonsense like making the frame adaptable for multiple configurations, including a VTOL version, can save a lot of time. A standard stealth aircraft body plan by any measure. Even the ruddervators have historically worked with the YF-23, meaning it can be done. Russian stealth has typically been a painted on coating, so less time needed to innovate some kind of stealth material (which they're not promising anyway). I can see them flying in 2023, at the very least meeting the brief of a 'first flight' with a bare bones aircraft with stealth coating.

    @deeya@deeya2 жыл бұрын
    • Anything can fly by 2023.

      @deeacosta2734@deeacosta27342 жыл бұрын
    • 2023? I'd give it more time than that. But definitely simplicity is their selling factor if the price is appropriately low as well

      @carlosandleon@carlosandleon2 жыл бұрын
    • Stealth paint is a less effective method of reducing a radar signature as opposed to using stealth materials. Both are known to degrade as time passes.

      @michaelkatz275@michaelkatz2752 жыл бұрын
    • @@michaelkatz275 I remember a f-35 documentary where a spokesman is saying 70% of stealth is the shape of the aircraft so it won't even matter,but I don't know they might decent stealth coating for the su-57 and the su-75 we"ll just have to wait and watch till it's first flight.

      @newguy954@newguy9542 жыл бұрын
    • @@newguy954 Yes, in the past that has been true. But now it is less so I understand due to the development of new materials. One of the reasons that the F-35 is limited to Mach 1.6 is that stealth materials have a habit of flying off the aircraft at high Mach numbers.

      @michaelkatz275@michaelkatz2752 жыл бұрын
  • Several problems I can see plaguing this aircraft. IF, and it’s a big if, Russia can pull this off at a $30 million price point, AND meet all of its specifications it claims it can achieve, it will be beyond impressive, considering they have yet to do it with the Su-57, of which only 14 have been built to date (which only have 2 units that are combat-ready, 12 used for training craft), and they have struggled to build even those numbers. Mind you, this hasn’t even flown yet. No flight testing has occurred. They are years away from mass producing this fighter, and it may not even see flight before the advent of sixth-generation fighter jets, which China, the UK, France, and the US are already developing (the US already announcing they have test flown a sixth-gen prototype). It may be outdated before it even leaves the ground. I would be very surprised if it can meet the $30 million price point without making significant sacrifices in capability, or Russia pressing forward, and omitting certain technologies initially promised to bring down the cost. Like I said, they haven’t been able to do it with the Su-57 yet, which is likely going to sell closer to $70 million/unit, up from the $50 million price point initially advertised. That said, if this is what Russia claims it to be, and they can field it in comparable numbers to rival the F-35, which has over 700 produced as of November 2021, and over a half-dozen buyers, it could be a beast, and a formidable rival. But I’ll believe it when I see it… If I see it. As I said earlier, we’re still waiting on the Su-57, which still has no foreign buyers. And with no foreign buyers, neither program will be a serious rival to the F-22/F-35, or even the J-20.

    @Krebssssssss@Krebssssssss2 жыл бұрын
    • I'm more worried about what China has, rather than Russia.

      @stellarcollapse@stellarcollapse2 жыл бұрын
    • The F 35 was better than this with a 45 million price target when it was a concept. Compromises in performance and increases in cost are always part of going from prototype to production. The SU 75 hasn't even reached the prototype stage yet. Russia loves to announce new weapons and brag about capabilities but their stuff rarely proves it's effectiveness in actual combat. The Russian military is only modern if you count ambitious projects as operational weapons. If you look at what they actually uses, it's all good war era stuff.

      @peterbruno657@peterbruno6572 жыл бұрын
    • And now war with Ukraine has left Russia in a situation where they can't even supply munitions for their troops and anything that isnt assault rifles and ammo for same is almost impossible to produce. All that high tech electronics they're claiming will be a feature are now probably out of reach as the west cuts off sales. I rekkon its dead in the water at this point and even if it isnt lets remember the Tu22, a supersonic bomber capable of bombing the USA from bases in Russia which, if propoganda was to be believed, they'd have 800 of by 1960. I mean, it WAS supersonic...

      @katrinapaton5283@katrinapaton52832 жыл бұрын
    • @@peterbruno657+ You are spot on Peter! I think Russia have built a couple of impressive looking Rolling display pieces. I think their ever crippling Financial Sanctions & Global Isolation is forcing them back decades in the world of Weapons Advancement! I believe this is a technique we'll be seeing a lot more of! Designing & building fancy concepts, give them a big public launch just to try & project a false image to other nations. The (SU-57) Is Basically An (SU-35) In A (F-22 RAPTOR) Style Fancy Dress Costume. I (Personally) feel Russia builds the (Sexiest Looking) fighter jets in the world, BUT they simply do not have the Engines & Avionics to compliment these creations. & this is only going to get worse!

      @NANIutd08@NANIutd08 Жыл бұрын
    • My thoughts exactly, how is a new entry in the Sukhoi line something to think about when the last one has barely made its mark

      @jackfromthejungle7538@jackfromthejungle7538 Жыл бұрын
  • When they build one prototype, they will move on Su86.

    @robertkrcmar557@robertkrcmar557 Жыл бұрын
  • If Sukhoi avoids the issues that plagued the F35 they can have a capable aircraft.

    @mitchjames9350@mitchjames93507 ай бұрын
  • It looks a lot like the YF 32. The plane that lost out to the F 35.

    @cjsteadman6217@cjsteadman62172 жыл бұрын
    • Because it is...they stole the plans🤯

      @SIGNALFREQ@SIGNALFREQ2 жыл бұрын
    • x-32*, and yes it does. when he said "it looks like the f35" im like, no, that stupid mouth clearly shows its dad is the x-32

      @kryse4806@kryse48062 жыл бұрын
    • Looks nothing like YF-23 , not to mention this is single engine and YF was double engined...

      @grujicdanijel7963@grujicdanijel79632 жыл бұрын
    • while the X-35 looks like the Yak 141 while this looks like the X-32 minus the big mouth

      @3nglehart@3nglehart2 жыл бұрын
    • It does not. It has other wings in different position, another nose. The idea is the same: 1-engine fighter with the smiley face in the front and the pitch-elevators, but the realization is completely different

      @maratkard@maratkard2 жыл бұрын
  • It doesnt look ANYTHING like the F-35. It looks similar to the SU-57, which is the point as it's sharing a lot of tech/design from that platform which keeps its cost low.

    @sisyphusvasilias3943@sisyphusvasilias39432 жыл бұрын
    • It’s like a thinner X-32

      @myusername3689@myusername36892 жыл бұрын
    • Russia has a couple of operational SU-57's. Now their economy is "Check mate", so this design is a paper tiger sales pitch.

      @la7dfa@la7dfa2 жыл бұрын
    • @@la7dfa the russian economy now is at its peak high because of gas and oil prices, i wonder where you get your information from

      @amir021idm@amir021idm Жыл бұрын
    • @@amir021idm you mean zhe oil and gas nobody is buying from them

      @lennymegakill9580@lennymegakill9580 Жыл бұрын
    • @@lennymegakill9580 when i buy things from the store i can afford whatever i want that’s what important for me, unlike other countries

      @amir021idm@amir021idm Жыл бұрын
  • A little bit too late. When this goes out, 6th gens will be starting their test flights

    @apeinto5637@apeinto5637 Жыл бұрын
  • Unlike the the F 35 , which is not a single engined F22 , Checkmate is more like a single engined SU 57. Which will help reduce development time. And it's very much export oriented.

    @sidharthcs2110@sidharthcs21102 жыл бұрын
    • I think of the SU-75 as more like the SU-57 if the Russian Federation had been patient and waited a few more years. They could've had this plane a little later, but they got stuck with the SU-57...now the SU-57 is a great plane and probably better than every 4th gen fighter in the world, but it's not a good 5th gen fighter!

      @laynestaley4957@laynestaley4957 Жыл бұрын
    • Air inlet sucks in air great from straight ahead,but amending direction amends flo RATE and that checkmate 75 Chyte..ABSOLUTE GOB CHYTE..Like news saying Putin's regime crumbling,these designs are same media swill for dumbies..

      @aldenunion@aldenunion10 ай бұрын
    • @@laynestaley4957 the Su-57 isn't a bad 5th gen, its just not a 5th gen, it has the RCS of a 4th gen.

      @swiffersweatjet7815@swiffersweatjet78159 ай бұрын
  • "But at 21st century, arm race continues at full speed ahead between the US and the Russian federation..." China: Am I a joke to you?

    @Non-StickPan@Non-StickPan2 жыл бұрын
    • welll condisdering on how many "license built" and copy paste they had they probably would have been probably DNF

      @destroyertashkent5713@destroyertashkent57132 жыл бұрын
    • Hmm nah.. It was just a cold war parallel and China wasn't part of it, so...

      @Yautah@Yautah2 жыл бұрын
    • Chinese tech is all stolen from the US and Russia

      @zqplyn-r6648@zqplyn-r66482 жыл бұрын
    • @@zqplyn-r6648 Can't agree with you more lmao Just want to ponit out China is making way more copypasted American weapons than Russia these days

      @Non-StickPan@Non-StickPan2 жыл бұрын
    • yes china is a joke

      @richardsears4665@richardsears46652 жыл бұрын
  • Does anyone know the brand of model glue they used?

    @carolinalonewolf9445@carolinalonewolf94453 ай бұрын
  • The checkmate is more of a russian heavily upgraded f16, rather than a f35 equivalent...

    @smtx2117@smtx2117 Жыл бұрын
  • 0:28 *outer wing pylons* "stealth"

    @xx_insert_cool_username_he6876@xx_insert_cool_username_he68762 жыл бұрын
    • That doesn't mean it'll have those outer pylons all the time. Just like the F35

      @sidharthcs2110@sidharthcs21102 жыл бұрын
    • The model was made by this channel so the blame's kinda on them

      @randompheidoleminor3011@randompheidoleminor30112 жыл бұрын
    • Stelf

      @blinthepannkek6173@blinthepannkek61732 жыл бұрын
    • They're made of wood

      @oxcart4172@oxcart41722 жыл бұрын
    • Someone's is stupid enough to not understand that this was an animation made of su 75 and the plane wont using them when it's on Stealth mode

      @dankshark4808@dankshark48082 жыл бұрын
  • No way of telling until they actually build the thing. Anyone can say "I'm going to build a fighter, and it's going to be futuristic and better than everyone else's fighter" but actually building the thing is a different story.

    @SelfProclaimedEmperor@SelfProclaimedEmperor2 жыл бұрын
    • Seriously, It sounds like children having an imaginary battle, they hope they can sell these things based on theory. Reminds me a lot of Tesla Semi.

      @bobzang5255@bobzang52552 жыл бұрын
    • They will probably never build it. Its first prototype is slated to be built only 5-10 years away from the US's sixth gen fighter.

      @laynestaley4957@laynestaley4957 Жыл бұрын
  • What good is the airframe if you can't source the electronics to make it go?

    @dave7830@dave7830 Жыл бұрын
  • I'm from Argentina and tbh we would be lucky to have something that isn't from the 1960s-1970s lmao we still fly our old A-4s if I'm not mistaken and we kinda struggle with getting new armament. Partly because of the UK embargo after the war and partly because our economy sucks

    @buscadiamantes1232@buscadiamantes12328 ай бұрын
    • Late reply, I know. But I read recently that Denmark are offering F-16s and the UK seem fine with it so maybe relations are improving, I certainly hope so. JF-17 Thunder and HAL Tejas are the other contenders, so hopefully those A4s can be safely retired soon.

      @benmckinlaywilliamson3394@benmckinlaywilliamson33945 ай бұрын
  • A very impressive and beautiful aircraft. Unfortunately, it has one problem - it doesn't exist.

    @sergejx7261@sergejx72612 жыл бұрын
    • All aircraft never existed in the first place.

      @ebiyeyanga8003@ebiyeyanga80032 жыл бұрын
    • My thoughts exactly, a scare tactic....they take our old found jets left at bases and reverse engineer them, always behind us.

      @lauranydb7979@lauranydb79792 жыл бұрын
    • Well, same was once said for many of the already existing Russia's modern weapons and military equipment, mostly just by some trolls and not real experts. Chances are high to see Su-75 first test flight next year already.

      @otvinta@otvinta2 жыл бұрын
    • @@otvinta When people speak truth, Russians would call them trolls and traitors. I'm sure the Soviet Union still exists only in Russia.

      @ebiyeyanga8003@ebiyeyanga80032 жыл бұрын
    • @@lauranydb7979 sounds like you love that sweet US propaganda. MUH F22

      @theswagman1263@theswagman12632 жыл бұрын
  • The words “voice recognition” made me cringe when I learned it would be used for controlling certain functions

    @connormclernon26@connormclernon262 жыл бұрын
  • Chess is a 2d game. Checkmate is created on a 2d chess game. Similarly, the 75 will probably stay on a 2d surface without ever flying.

    @foopys3270@foopys327011 ай бұрын
    • Bruh XD

      @02suraditpengsaeng41@02suraditpengsaeng4111 ай бұрын
  • The F-35 is far from a failure

    @timwhitten9918@timwhitten9918 Жыл бұрын
    • Yeah, I’ll never get how the people who subscribe to Pierre spray can call the most commercially successful and massed produced stealth fighter in history a flop

      @nathanielweber7843@nathanielweber7843 Жыл бұрын
    • Right. It's a close failure. Still not operational.

      @jgarbo3541@jgarbo3541 Жыл бұрын
    • It hardly works

      @elihernandez330@elihernandez330 Жыл бұрын
    • @@elihernandez330 If it hardly works then why do countries keep buying it?

      @AuroraTheRobot@AuroraTheRobot Жыл бұрын
    • @@elihernandez330 What about it hardly works then

      @kandd2591@kandd2591 Жыл бұрын
  • I’m seeing two elements from the joint strike fighter program and both of them are coming from the Boeing X 32. The engine intake is similar to the X 32 and it has a Pelikan tail.

    @ethanfairweather8736@ethanfairweather87362 жыл бұрын
    • Agree. I see it as well. Looks like a stretched, slim down and sexier X32A JSF prototype.

      @AhmadHermi@AhmadHermi2 жыл бұрын
  • Visually it looks like a stretched Boeing F-32 , the plane that everyone laughed at . Cockpit , intake , wings, tails ..............................................this is beautiful , hope they build it ..💛💙

    @fredtedstedman@fredtedstedman Жыл бұрын
  • 2:45 the similarities between F35 and Su75.. Well, didn't Lockheed Martin bought and improved on a Soviet VTOL jet design? So of course..

    @Rocky-rh3rz@Rocky-rh3rz Жыл бұрын
  • jet fighter with external pylons can't be stealth at all, and with external loading it loose all superiority comparing to 4th gen jets.

    @borise4104@borise41047 ай бұрын
  • Small amendment. This aircraft is primarily aimed at selling abroad. For third countries, SU-57 is expensive. Therefore, the manufacturer did not make this commercial project by order from the Ministry of Defense, as usual, but on an initiative basis independently and expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Be specific in the comments.

    @giggling_boatswain@giggling_boatswain2 жыл бұрын
    • The last Stealth airframe Russia built was th SU-57 they had one count it one partner: India. India pulled out and is now buy French Mirage.

      @softballm1991@softballm1991 Жыл бұрын
    • India cancelled their Su 57s because they thought they were scrap

      @PD-yd3fr@PD-yd3fr4 ай бұрын
  • 12:56 they decided to replace it with the f-22, then the f-35 and now another f-16. What a great idea, right!

    @M3PH11@M3PH112 жыл бұрын
    • they almost decided to ressurrect the canadian avro arrow and give it some upgrades instead of choosing the f-35, even after 60 years a few upgrades and modern avionics and the avro arrow could easily contend with fifth generation fighters for a fraction of the cost, but uncle sam doesnt like competition, they always pressured foreign countries to not invest or buy from canada and they helped scrap the cl-84 which was canadas vtol craft that the osprey was based on decades later and they also pressured diefenbaker to scrap the avro arrow program which spelled the end for canadas aerospace industry, at that time canada was a world leader and had the worlds 4th largest airforce, were the 3rd country to launch a sattelite into space and after the avro arrow program was scrapped and 17,500 people were left jobless the best of the industry moved to the US and joined NASA and were instrumental in the success of the space program and the moon landing.

      @King_Flippy_Nips@King_Flippy_Nips2 жыл бұрын
  • Just a simple question How in the hell having air intake in the lower body how one can store weapons in internal bay?

    @ayushaladeen4894@ayushaladeen48946 ай бұрын
  • the 75 in su 75 femboy name refers to the number of years it will take for Russia to build an actual stealth fighter

    @sms9070@sms9070 Жыл бұрын
  • When he said “has America very afraid” I knew he knew nothing about export or military powers. Lel

    @fwix771@fwix7712 жыл бұрын
    • If you have ever watched the russian/american channel "RT", that is most of their content is propaganda by a young american guy.

      @lauranydb7979@lauranydb79792 жыл бұрын
KZhead