Gulfstream G800 vs Dassault Falcon 10X | FULL COMPARISON
What if we told you that there are two private jets that defy the bounds of luxury and speed? Meet the Gulfstream G800 and Dassault Falcon 10X, where supersonic flight meets lavish comfort. These jets are vying for supremacy in the business aviation world, travelling faster than the speed of sound. In today’s video, we delve into the depths of their performance, design, features, and pricing. Which of these jets emerges as the dream jet? Stick around, and let's explore the skies of luxury and innovation.
In today's video we look at Gulfstream G800 vs Dassault Falcon 10X | FULL COMPARISON
🎁 Become a WOL Member Today: bit.ly/join_wol
🔔 Don't miss our latest jet reviews-hit the bell icon!
👇 Enjoying the content? Consider buying me a coffee to help me creating these videos. Your support means a lot!
➡️ www.buymeacoffee.com/world_of...
Subscribe for Private Jet, Billionaire Lifestyle and Luxury Lifestyle. Inspired by King Luxury, Sam Chui and Aviation Base.
Inspired by Dassault Falcon 10X VS Gulfstream G700 | FULL COMPARISON
Inspired by Bombardier Global 8000 VS Gulfstream G800
Inspired by A First Look at Dassault’s Falcon 10X Ultra-Long-Range Business Jet - AIN
Click here to subscribe: bit.ly/Subscribe-to-WoL
Thank you for your support!
Click here to become a WOL Member today and to support our channel: bit.ly/join_wol
1) Thank you for watching 💪 Please share this video with loved ones and groups. It helps everyone discover this content! 2 ) Drop a comment with your thoughts or suggestions. We value your input. Thanks! 🙌✨
Please.....these jets are not supersonic. How could you make such a huge error?
Because it's just a bunch of clips from manufactures marketing videos. This channel doesn't know anything about aircraft. You can really tell when the voice over keeps mispronouncing 'Dassault' over and over
❤😮 EXACTLY that is TERRIBLE mistake
Chatbot 😅
Maybe the manufacturers had to take them supersonic during certification flight testing.
Falcon 10x please 😊
I like the G800, but the final factor is the Dassualt is the same company that builds the French Fighters..and their fighters are top notch!
Well that is true but gulfstream is owned by General Dynamics which makes the F-16 which is probably better than any french jet. Plus they don't use fighter jet engines on busness jets
@@kemithapeiris you might wanna rethink that!
U disagree U think the French make better fighter planes they don't even have a 5th gen fighter out. i am not saying u are wrong just think u doubt the capability of a F22 compared to any french plane
@@kemithapeiris overall I know that the U.S. fighters are better, I'm a Marine..but all I'm saying is that the 10X is an impressive commercial aircraft.....but the French Mirage is no joke..it has had success against the f22 and the f16, first plane to shoot down and f22 in simulated dog fight
Respect on the marine. u probably know more than me after all i am only a student. the Mirage simulation, i assumed that was just propoganda to boost the mirage guess i was wrong u our right the 10x is an impressive plane . just wondering during the similation was the F-22 in absolute steath like u know like no communication because I assumed it wouldn't show up on radar cause the composite coating which is meant to absorb the radar waves or scramble them is in all the F-22 in service
Both aircraft are very good but for a long flight the extra 11 inches of cabin width makes a huge difference in passenger comfort.
Falcon looks like a nicer place to be on a long trip but I would gladly take either
Gulfstream makes an amazing plane. they don't just sell to you because you're rich. you have to be able to maintain it. My dad flew a G-5 and it had to go to gulf stream twice a year. You never hear of gulf stream crashing.
Wasn't a easy win for G800,I thought it was going to totally dominant falcon 10x,but it was close,the Gulfstream still wins,I wouldn't mind adding the Falcon 10x to my fleets though.✍️
Yes, you're right. Both jets are amazing
What did you like about the Falcon 10X over the G800?
Interior is unique & full of life & more spacious, actually feels more personal & less official, unlike Gulfstream, which is mostly suitable for business & nice to have partners in it
Wien Two jets are similar in almost everything, interior space and rest make te difference,in this case the falcon takes the trophy by far.
You only compare the Dassault falcon 10X and the Gulfstream G800. But you for get that there is a 3rd aircraft in the same category which is the Bombardier Global 8000. All 3 ULR business jets has a similar range and more..... But for me, the Dassaul falcon 10X and the Bombardier Global 7500 and 8000 are my favourite aircraft.
The Global 8000 is indeed the superior plane, it has the range of the G800 and the large 4 zone cabin plus crew rest of the Falcon 10x.
@@christianbayerstein5243 How about the Embraer Lineage 1000?
@@NeonTechnologyStack the Lineage 1000 has a range of only 4500 nm, no competition for the Gulfstreams or Globals.
Vertical take-off and halfing its wing span will be new challenge
wouldn't the G700 be a better comparison as it offers more interior room, IE is the largest Gulfstream and would be against the largest Dassault Falcon with both having a private bedroom suite and shower option?
Is there an option for an anti-missile defense system?
Is it possible to increase the fuel tanks substantially on any of these?
As long as it takes off and lands safely that’s enough luxury for me.
The cabin seats in the 10X look horrendous and uncomfortable.
Dassault is the master of the world.
สนใจคับ
What about the Global 8000??
i was thinking the same
These jets are not supersonic!
fuel consumption in pound per mile is that even a unit lol What about t/h for business jets consumptions?
Nice video, but this an apples to oranges comparison. The G800 has a 10’ shorter cabin than the G700. The G700 will be flagship for cabin size, directly comparable to the 10X, yet a faster maximum Mach (Mm0) at .935. The G800 will have the cabin size of the G650, but when all is said and done, a legitimate range of 8000 nautical miles or better (think Pacific Ocean crossing). Much farther than the D10X or the G700.
And the Bombardier Global 8000 tops them both!
How?
faster,longer.@@TChalla007
The Global 8000 has the range of the G800 and the larger 4 zone cabin of the Falcon 10x.@@TChalla007
Falcon 9X for me 🎉
LOL. comparing these two that haven't been certified yet while not discussing the Global 7500 which is in service. or if you want to discuss upcoming biz jets where is the Global 8000?
We also made a video from this 😊
Здравейте х10 2024 lyxse interior 2024😊 весело посрещане на всички дами по света честит 8 март😊 много здраве и късмет желаят всичко добро 😊
MI REY
🇺🇸 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 🇫🇷 .amen
Where supersonic meets luxury not sure that’s true
Both are dream jets, but not supersonic...
9,206 MIES, you guys need to use spellcheck 😂😂😂😂😂
Falcon can do better missions than the Gulfstream
10x is comparable to G700 its not like for like
💥🐲🐉💯
You just read two press releases and made a video out of it. that's a downvote
Narrated with obvious bias toward the Gulfstreem.
Can't even spell miles or put metric in subtitles.
Pardon me for bringing up one little annoyance: Pronouncing "Dassault" improperly. ☹️ Pronunciation here: kzhead.info/sun/rb5tmqmkjYR-mmg/bejne.htmlsi=78C1ddizKs92TyaF
Because it's just a bunch of clips from manufactures marketing videos. This channel doesn't know anything about aircraft.
The Falcon does not even come close to the G800
How?
why??? The Falcon X has a much larger 4 zone cabin, whereas the Gulfstream G800 has only 3 zones, because it is a shorter version of the G700. If you don't need the extra range of 500 nm of the G800, you would better take the Falcon 10x. And if you need the extra range you would better take the Bombardier 8000 which offers the same range as the G800 , but also has the much larger 4 zone cabin of the falcon 10x.
You wouldn't say that if you were 6 foot four.
@@vipstarizm6990 Facts. I'm, 6'6" ex athlete.
0,4 pounds per mile?! 😮 Что за чушь? Может всё таки 0,4 gal per mile?