How the Royal Navy RESPONDS to Russian Navy THREATS | Documentary

2024 ж. 2 Қаң.
382 595 Рет қаралды

Did you know that there’s an intense yet quiet war fought between the British and Russians? In this battle, the British Royal Navy, making use of cutting-edge technology and centuries' worth of maritime experience, overthrows Russian naval threats like it’s nothing. These acts are way more than just confrontational, you can see them as a game of chess with geopolitical skills.
With the heating of the geopolitical climate, waters surrounding Europe have become home to an increasingly tense atmosphere between Britain and Russia. In a rather bold and provocative series of moves, Russia has been pushing the limits in these waters, testing the patience of European nations. This isn't just a splash in the ocean; it's a strategic move that's drawing attention and concern on an international scale.
In response to this rising tension and the need to safeguard the integrity of European maritime borders, Britain has taken a decisive step. The Royal Navy, a venerable force with a legacy of maintaining maritime order, has been deployed to monitor Russian naval activities closely. This move by Britain isn't just about flexing naval muscle; it's a clear message of vigilance and readiness.
These Royal Navy warships, equipped with advanced surveillance and defense capabilities, are Britain's eyes and ears in these contested waters. Their presence serves as a deterrent, a reminder of Britain's commitment to protect its interests and those of its European neighbors. As these warships patrol and monitor, they represent a critical component of Britain's strategic response, showcasing a blend of restraint and readiness that's essential in today's times. #royalnavy #aircraftcarrier #british #navy
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Become a member and proudly bear the title of 'Navy Life Supporter'!
As a 'Navy Life Supporter', you show your appreciation and respect for all Navy Sailors. By becoming a member, you not only support this channel but also enjoy fun extras like unique badges and emojis, and your comments get the attention they deserve!
Let's share special experiences and stories in the comments under the videos. This is the chance for former sailors to reminisce and for everyone curious about life at sea. It's more than just sharing stories; let's together discover and share the fascinating and diverse aspects of maritime life. Let's strive to show the world how intriguing and complex the life of a sailor at sea can be, with all its challenges and adventures.
Together, we offer a glimpse into the unique world of the navy and show our appreciation for the brave men and women who brave the open sea and defend our country. Whether you want to relive old sea tales or learn more about the maritime world, it's all possible here.
Do you also want to show your appreciation and support for the brave men and women of the Navy? Support this channel by becoming a member!
Click the link below and proudly become a 'Navy Life Supporter'!
/ @navyproductions

Пікірлер
  • Dear patriotic Brits , thank you for your steadfast support to my home country, USA. Recently both nations have collaborated to respond to the Houtis who did their best to upset international maritime traffic. Our long term goals remain as one against the old adversary, Russia. Your professional Navy is world class.

    @rudolfyakich6653@rudolfyakich66534 ай бұрын
    • . We cannot send our aircraft carrier to suez because we do not have the resources to man or operate it. It is scandelous. Our navy is a laughing stock & incapable of anything. We cannot even supply our own ship that is in the gulf because we do not have an active supply ship. We will have to rely on the goodwill of another country. What sort of farcical navy do you call that. The RN is s..t.

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
    • Not only world class, but one of the most proven Navies in the world.

      @RogueCylon@RogueCylon4 ай бұрын
    • @@RogueCylon Rubbish. It cannot get its aircraft carrier out of harbour due to lack of resources. It cannot re supply the destroyer in the gulf as we do not have any supply ships. Please talk sense.We do not have a working navy of any more. None of our existing modern ships have been in any sustained battle. We have fired off a few missiles when under cover of the americans & that is it. WE HAVE NOT BEEN PROVEN

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
    • Let us hope that the result of the Presidential Election does not result in the withdrawal of America from NATO.

      @robertmiller1299@robertmiller12994 ай бұрын
    • @@robertmiller1299 It will not. The Republican offering uses bluster but knows the hard facts. It is a damn shame that Ukraine is now a electoral bargaining chip. Extreme foolishness prevails for the time being. These issues must be resolved. The current "president" now sides with terrorists in Israel to appease his terrorist base here in the USA.

      @rudolfyakich6653@rudolfyakich6653Ай бұрын
  • God bless our shipmates from Great Britain. Fair winds & following seas ! 🫡 🇬🇧 🇺🇸

    @billotto602@billotto6024 ай бұрын
    • 🇺🇲👍. 🇬🇧🙌

      @Zubair-to2jq@Zubair-to2jq4 ай бұрын
  • Being patriotic of my country, the UK, I am more than confident of all of our fighting forses.

    @alanmcmillan6969@alanmcmillan69694 ай бұрын
  • Its not about the size of the navy, its about the quality of the men and women who serve aboard Royal Navy ships. The UK has fended off numerous opponents whilst outnumbered and the Royal Navy has won numerous battles during its service to the United Kingdom, yes due to cuts and ships being mothballed we are not quite where we once were but we're still capable of defending not just the UK but also our allies, the seas and all interests.

    @i_druth@i_druth4 ай бұрын
    • the best navy in the world 🌍 UK

      @SurprisedDesertCobra-px6nd@SurprisedDesertCobra-px6nd4 ай бұрын
    • Very important fact! Respect from USA! Your navy is a marvelous force!

      @changingworldllc1157@changingworldllc11574 ай бұрын
    • Absolutely agree. The Royal Navy may not be the biggest in the world anymore but they are still 100% the BEST. They've been best for... ohh.... five hundred years now and will continue to be for centuries to come. Check out Drachinifel's video about the voyage of the Russian 2nd Pacific Squadron. Near the start of that voyage the Russians mistook the trawlers of Hull Fishing Fleet for Japanese torpedo boats (yeah.... they did.....) and opened fire managing to damage a couple and sink one. The Tsar immediately apologised and made restitution, but until the crisis was settled the ships of the RN Channel Fleet and Mediterranean Fleet were ordered to stand to and prepare in case the two sides ended up going to war. After Admiral Beresford, commander of the Med Fleet, studied what had happened and saw the ABYSMAL Russian gunnery (one ship firing more than 300 rounds and not hitting ANYTHING) he wrote that he was preparing a "chivalrous" response, and he'd send four of his battleships to deal with the Russian fleet. The Russian fleet that had 29 warships. Yeah. Even all those years ago the Royal Navy STILL had a sense of humour.....

      @trevorday7923@trevorday79234 ай бұрын
    • We have not won any wars with our current navy. The falklands was ages ago. Since then we cannot send our aircraft carrier to suez because we do not have the resources to man or operate it. It is scandelous. Our navy is a laughing stock & incapable of anything. We cannot even supply our own ship that is in the gulf because we do not have an active supply ship. We will have to rely on the goodwill of another country. What sort of farcical navy do you call that. The RN is s..t.

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
    • @@trevorday7923 Lol, they definitely aren't the best anymore

      @Flightman453@Flightman45325 күн бұрын
  • God bless the U.K. From your brother across the atlantic.🇺🇸&🇬🇧👍🙏

    @Mike-tq7nz@Mike-tq7nz4 ай бұрын
    • 🇺🇲👍. 🇬🇧🙌

      @Zubair-to2jq@Zubair-to2jq4 ай бұрын
  • As a Brit, I am happy that, Finally, the Government appears to be changing their attitude to the Armed Forces. To be Honest I thought that Labour Policy was being implemented There is FAR MORE to do to Restore the UK Military after YEARS of Cuts, but in terms of Innovation and Technology, we do appear to possess a cutting edge in most areas Rich Rishi cannot keep Labour Out. God knows who, in Central Office, ever thought he could Possibly be Popular in Today's UK. He does NOTHING he says he will do. Boats? What Boats?

    @Rabmac1UK@Rabmac1UK4 ай бұрын
  • Being a patriotic Brit I’m sure the Royal Navy is bloody good especially considering its relatively small size. The deployed technology is cutting edge. But and there is always a but, bigger Navies sheer weight of numbers could be a handful.

    @davehadley3567@davehadley35674 ай бұрын
    • 🇬🇧🇺🇸

      @bonniejordan8192@bonniejordan81924 ай бұрын
    • And are you aware that the Russians sink this in 2 minutes? And after that you will swim around the island like rats.

      @user-lf2jh2ru9f@user-lf2jh2ru9f4 ай бұрын
    • Never annoy a swimming rat ...@@user-lf2jh2ru9f

      @johnhough7738@johnhough77384 ай бұрын
    • @@user-lf2jh2ru9fputin is that you?

      @lgbak20@lgbak204 ай бұрын
    • @@lgbak20 Yes,thats me,Putin. Vladimir Vladimirovic Putin.

      @user-lf2jh2ru9f@user-lf2jh2ru9f4 ай бұрын
  • The Royal navy has a thousand years of experience. Its traditions and self confidence have remained, despite politicians parsimony. Still the best navy in the world

    @nwandarsa@nwandarsa4 ай бұрын
    • yet wont defend its own borders as were invaded by illegal migrants

      @joelaw5207@joelaw52074 ай бұрын
    • Most of the women & trans operating as pa.sy sailors in our current fleet are not fighters. They are just lefty woke diversity tick box posts. What I want to know is where are the disabled & wheel chair users. Then it would be the complete joke .. Clearly 1000 years of experience means sweet FA if you think it does

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
    • The Royal Navy is the shop window for BAE Systems. Both the European navies and Russian shadow box all the time, its a pantomine based on the MAD principle (Mutual Assured Destruction). Ourselves, the French and the US in NATO all have sub launched nuclear missiles. There are many other countries (unofficially) have nuclear tipped deployable missiles. Most of the modern navies have the technology but not the locker of weapons or personel (serving and technical) to actually deploy their fleets. The UK can maybe deploy eight escorts, three subs, and some glorified fisheries protection vessels (River Class). If it got into a shooting war it doesn't have the auxillary ships to re-supply (Europe certainly doesn't). There are three higher technical and skilled (smaller) navies in the world that can actually deploy ships in numbers, none are in Europe. They are Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. Sorry to burst the bubble of eneryone but the Royal Navy (and I'm British) is not as strong as everyone thinks. If it wasn't for US backing it would not be able to deploy the aircraft carriers (essentially second decks for the US Maine Corps) and subs (the engines and missiles are all based on US technology transfer). Type 45 may look all very nice but three are always being repaired and the UK doesn't have the money to actually arm them for conflict. Oh, shooting down cheap Iranian drones doesn't count.

      @lawrenceabbott5292@lawrenceabbott52924 ай бұрын
    • It's worthless. Just like the entire brit 'military' 👎

      @dioghaltasfoirneartach7258@dioghaltasfoirneartach72584 ай бұрын
    • Haha, best navy in the world. The Royal Navy could be destroyed in one day. USA USA USA We are top dog! You are our bitches… Suck it up you has- beens.

      @user-nh1ub7vq5z@user-nh1ub7vq5z4 ай бұрын
  • With new warships and subs coming on line we’re getting kick ass in our navy now

    @philipkersey4892@philipkersey48924 ай бұрын
  • Keep up the good work.

    @rayallan8481@rayallan84814 ай бұрын
  • Rah Rah Royal Navy. Im British BTW. While the RN does have some good and very good ships. It does not have nearly enough of anything. Typical penny pinching and head in the sand thinking from the politicians. The rule of thumb for warships is four. Number One on station doing its job. Number two working up to replace the first on station, or be surged out. Number three is in pier side maintenance . Number four has its guts strewn across a drydock in refit. The UK has six Daring class ASW Destroyers. We were supposed to have 12. With 12, that's three out doing its job. It all goes to hell if a single ship has an accident or is sunk with six. More hulls means less wear on ship and crews. So both last longer. The US Navy has been effectively running on a Wartime footing since 2001. With a third of the USN at sea at anyone time. Which is why ships are wearing out and crew retention is falling. The RN and The USN are in the same boat (ha). Neither have any cheap plentiful ships to show up and show a countries interest aka showing the flag. We both have to sent billion plus tier One ships. As that's all they both have left. So more wear on ships and crews racing all over the planet to show the flag. The UK needs to return to its national strength. Boots on the ground has never been the British strength. The UK can never generate a realistic ground force due to the population numbers. The Cold War British forces in Germany where a historical aberration. The UK need severely expand the RN. Its politicians rushing British Forces all over to look "tough". The RN does not have the ships to just peel off a Daring to zip across to wherever for some politician's whim. Rant almost over :) If the RN had the ships as specified when first ordered (12 Darings and three QE Carriers etc). We would have enough hulls to do everything being asked of the RN with some slack.

    @Yandarval@Yandarval4 ай бұрын
    • Darings reduced from 12 to 8 by Blair. Reduced from 8 to 6 by Brown. Thanks boys!

      @barrymiller3385@barrymiller33854 ай бұрын
    • @@barrymiller3385 Both sides are just a guilty.

      @Yandarval@Yandarval4 ай бұрын
    • @@Yandarval we should have never moffball our other carrier. Wasted tax payers money, look at hs2. What a joke. The politicians dont know how to budget and waste whole load of cash.

      @leeparsons70@leeparsons7010 сағат бұрын
  • After seeing Russian Army and all its incompetence, I wouldn’t put too much credence into there 2nd class Navy!

    @Dave-sg6br@Dave-sg6br4 ай бұрын
    • I can you have no idea what you talking about , i'm brit myself i love my country but if you think that russia fighting a proxy war agains the whole nato for almost 2 years is "incompetence"you should really get educated about these stuff.

      @FactsFactorytwo@FactsFactorytwo4 ай бұрын
    • ⁠@@FactsFactorytwoYour about as British as Mad Vlad the man who’s lost half the Black Sea Fleet to a country without a navy.😂🤣😂

      @mac2626@mac26264 ай бұрын
    • AHAHAHAHAHAH ROYAL NAVY IS INCOMPETENT NOT RUSSIA NAVY. NO ONE STORM SHADOW CAN HIT CRIMEA ANYMORE. UK BECAME A TIERCE WORLD COUNTRY

      @aldinokalla868@aldinokalla8684 ай бұрын
    • Get yourself over to the frontline and test out that Incompetence and if you make it back I'd be delighted to hear your version of Russian Incompetence. As for a 2nd class Navy, it's bigger than ours and probably better tooled up weapon wise and Tech savvy, so they've lost a couple of ships, it's a war, you do tend to lose things, however with something like 40 + countries emptying their stocks of military eqp't and supplies ie NATO basically fk'ed Russia is still winning.

      @Alien9828@Alien98284 ай бұрын
    • @@mac2626 because Russia destroyed their Navy, cast your mind back to 1982 if your old enough, where we Brits lost a good amount of our Navy to Argentina

      @Alien9828@Alien98284 ай бұрын
  • Glory to British Royal Navy !!!

    @Olizimm@Olizimm4 ай бұрын
    • *Royal Navy. It’s the only navy in the world not qualified by nation. So the correct term is simply: Royal Navy.

      @OiOiSillyBoi@OiOiSillyBoi4 ай бұрын
  • A vast library of sonar information is a edge in any form of naval warfare, some libraries contain books but the naval library contains information on everything submarine and surface systems and other military matters, knowledge is power

    @paulb8603@paulb86034 ай бұрын
  • Every point made in this segment has to compensate the British procurement process which sometimes seems haphazard.

    @sundragon7703@sundragon77034 ай бұрын
    • Sometimes? Mate, our procurement process has been a mess since the 1970s. The Army are always put last. With the defence secretary asking the Royal Marines to justify their existence recently, I suspect the fighting men of the Royal Navy are about to experience the same disregard our Army have lived with for decades. Imagine asking the Royal Marines to justify their existence! I was an Infantry soldier for 13 years, it was the Royal Marines I respected the most, not the Paras (although they are worthy of respect).

      @madMARTYNmarsh1981@madMARTYNmarsh19814 ай бұрын
  • God bless America our trusted friend and brother in arms, Amen.

    @ty2124@ty21244 ай бұрын
    • America needs Blessing by God, Its that Evil.

      @newton18311@newton183114 ай бұрын
    • You need to read your history lad on how the Americans deliberately set out to bankrupt Britain during and after WW2 and forced you to give up your empire.

      @davidcampbell3642@davidcampbell36424 ай бұрын
    • trusted? what are YOU smoking?

      @Mike7O7O@Mike7O7O21 күн бұрын
  • "Suddenly a submarine, a blip on the RADAR" Yeah, Subs do not appear on RADAR, they appear on SONAR.

    @Hedington@Hedington2 сағат бұрын
  • If the Royal Navy had promoted this content ,it could welll have proved an ideal recruitment tool. This would be particularly useful currently

    @boblovell5789@boblovell57894 ай бұрын
  • the best of the best well trained and over a hundred years of experience

    @SurprisedDesertCobra-px6nd@SurprisedDesertCobra-px6nd4 ай бұрын
    • Well over 400years 😎

      @Bob10009@Bob100094 ай бұрын
  • 10:53 That was probably a sonobuoy, but imagine a MAD detector down deep and sensing in a sphere instead of what's close underwater?

    @greggweber9967@greggweber99674 ай бұрын
  • The elephant in the Ward room is that Britain’s defences (including the RN) have been hollowed out. We need more ships, planes, troops and tanks to meet the most daunting international situation for decades.

    @robertmiller1299@robertmiller12994 ай бұрын
  • Happy new year ❤2024 good jobs 🎉keep up the great work 💐wonderful world clean love ❤️ 😊

    @angelaychou5128@angelaychou51284 ай бұрын
  • Britain/ Europe gets SOSUS line and Baltic. USA Gets First Island Chain and Persian Gulf stuff. France and Spain (If they are participating with the west are working the Mediterranean/ East atlantic.

    @watchthe1369@watchthe13694 ай бұрын
    • We cannot work the Dover Strait. Nor could we stop Somali pirates a few years ago. Pathetic effort. The Iranian Gunboats- tiny little runabouts- run rings around HMS Duncan regularly. They just take the piss out of us.

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
  • The boys in the air also have their owngoing thing too. I'd back the Royal Navy every time when needed to be called on and that goes for all the other Forces too. No matter their state!

    @carlwhite3471@carlwhite34714 ай бұрын
  • Britain's pride. We must be on top of the many naval threats as our very life blood depends on the sea. Though now four decades ago the Falklands war did a lot to wake us up to how important the navy is.

    @stephenbesley3177@stephenbesley31774 ай бұрын
  • A pity that the Royal Navy's "cutting-edge technology and centuries' worth of maritime experience" is of no use in stopping the invasion of rubber dinghies that is in progress along the Southern coast.

    @jon-xd7tl@jon-xd7tl4 ай бұрын
    • It’s not their job 🤦🏻‍♂️

      @Bob10009@Bob100094 ай бұрын
    • @@Bob10009That's a lame excuse.

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
    • @@MrDertien no, the OP is talking bollox.

      @Bob10009@Bob100093 ай бұрын
    • @@Bob10009 The only ones talking bollox here are those in this propaganda video, blindly following their Führers... the politicians wearing suits who are good at beating their chests like gorillas while sending a young generation into iron coffins to fight supposedly evil Russians. There is no honor in dying as a tool for a fool of a 'Ser', especially not to enrich the rich elites of the Blackrock conglomerate.

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
    • @@Bob10009 Furthermore, I think OP was being cynical, and in that case he's not talking bollox at all, you just didn't read between the lines.

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
  • They don't leave Portsmouth easy.

    @peterfox2538@peterfox25384 ай бұрын
  • BRITANIA RULES THE WAVES 🇬🇧

    @timtom2522@timtom25224 ай бұрын
  • Britain and the USA both have equal understanding of how they must maintain control of the sea for overall security. The USA has strategic depth, Britain has to remain tactical/ operational due to limits of their economy and proximity of the threat to their borders. I tam surprised that the USA is not starting up another bunch of Burke Class (Ticonderogas maybe?) with a hull extension to take missiles as large as the minuteman..... for ballistic interceptors that can be deployed forward, or very deep magazines to increase fleet ordnance supplies afloat.

    @watchthe1369@watchthe13694 ай бұрын
    • The Brits and Yanks are going to bring the Aussies onboard with the latest sub tech. The five eyes group could take on the world and win.

      @noahway13@noahway134 ай бұрын
    • I wouldn't even go to the cinema with the one who escaped from Afghanistan as a mouse.

      @user-lf2jh2ru9f@user-lf2jh2ru9f4 ай бұрын
    • The Burke hull is tapped completely out. Its a 70s hullform. Just look at what it was like when launched and now. The flight III Burkes are hauling 1300 more long tonnes around then when launched. Burkes are a Sardine tin now. Any and all available space has already been used for upgrades. What's needed is a new hull design. If the Zumwalt infrastructure had not been canned. Thats the hullforn the US should have continued with. The Zumwalts have the space and power generation for a huge weapon fit. Its the usual suspects that canned it. The hullform and engines design works fine. Its only the Koolaid weapon systems it was supposed to have that are vaporware. If only the the block III Burkes weapons and sensor fit have been "slapped" on to a Zumwalt. You US would not have had to restart Burke production with a crash programme.

      @Yandarval@Yandarval4 ай бұрын
    • Are you talking about Russia? @@user-lf2jh2ru9f

      @noahway13@noahway134 ай бұрын
  • Again as a Brit I am please to see our naval capabilities modernise, but as well as acting alone the Royal Navy is part of NATO. A force that Russia does not want to take on. I would say Putin’s war on Ukraine has proved how inadequate his military is and suffering a 20% loss of ships in the back sea to a country without a naval force again points to Russia’s over estimation of it’s capability.

    @steverobinson2389@steverobinson23894 ай бұрын
    • Когда мы потеряли 20 кораблей в Тихом океане???🤔

      @igordyvak@igordyvak4 ай бұрын
    • Я сказал, что вы потеряете все корабли в периферии. я сказал, что Россия потеряла корабли в Бакловом море возле Крыма

      @steverobinson2389@steverobinson23894 ай бұрын
  • How many years are needed to replace an RN warship? 5 - 8 yes Therefore we can't afford to lose a ship in a war. Why have such power projection capability when is irreplaceable?

    @petersellers9219@petersellers92194 ай бұрын
  • The brits dont have the biggest navy anymore but they always show up

    @bravo2zero796@bravo2zero7964 ай бұрын
  • Peace is the way forward

    @Oui700@Oui7004 ай бұрын
  • Within NATO, the term ‘RN’ is usually replaced by ‘UKN’, to avoid confusion. This has been the routine for more than 40 years. It is used mainly to identify naval staff source service, for example, ‘Commander Bloggs UKN.

    @johnarrow3354@johnarrow33544 ай бұрын
    • Erm… No.

      @Ubique2927@Ubique29274 ай бұрын
  • Yes, analyse, muss work together. But we also need to be Ready to protect ourselves at the same time you should never rely on your allies alone Friends always can turn on You. friends

    @user-kq4hu9kt4q@user-kq4hu9kt4q3 ай бұрын
  • How to change the print size on hp pronter

    @johnfuller6430@johnfuller64304 ай бұрын
  • Winning a short battle against the Royal Navy may happen. Surprise and a clever plan can do that sometimes. You aren't however, going to win the war. The British have a lot of good hardware and love to fight. Better bet on Britain.

    @GM-fh5jp@GM-fh5jp4 ай бұрын
  • I swear that carrier was on fire

    @incomingvirus5569@incomingvirus55694 ай бұрын
  • Being that we only have a dozen or so active war ships it'll be prudent to keep away from other countries sea lanes and just protect our British coastline,

    @philipellis4530@philipellis45304 ай бұрын
  • Britain simply sends this emoji over to the russians.... 😅.

    @Mr.Canuck@Mr.Canuck4 ай бұрын
  • With modern missile systems large naval assets are very vulnerable.

    @projectedone@projectedone4 ай бұрын
    • Depends on Défense of these assets, You dont put Assets in harms way if you cannot defend them.

      @newton18311@newton183114 ай бұрын
    • as it stands now there is no defence against hypersonic missiles. I know Ukraine claims to have shot down some but that turns out being false

      @projectedone@projectedone4 ай бұрын
  • what would adm nelson do ??? foward i believe sir

    @thelivingbranch@thelivingbranch4 ай бұрын
  • I hope all this technology is EMP protected...............

    @GraemeMurphy@GraemeMurphy4 ай бұрын
  • Most recently I hear vitriol and angst towards the UK from Russia and I don’t where that is coming from or what is pissing the Russians off ! Surely the Russians don’t think that the Brits took out their pipeline there has to be some verbal bruha going on ! I hope the Brits tread lightly here !

    @oceanhome2023@oceanhome202328 күн бұрын
  • Kinžal, Cirkon and?.?

    @dragankostic3491@dragankostic34914 ай бұрын
  • AND don't forget the 1/r

    @ggoodwin6202@ggoodwin62024 ай бұрын
  • India found out how good the master USA & British were in1971 tried to attack India they ran away when seen Russias submarine

    @prafulbhadesia4964@prafulbhadesia49644 ай бұрын
  • Brillant video fair play commentary top class

    @adrianshjadesheehan9991@adrianshjadesheehan99914 ай бұрын
  • @user-pt5hl9rr7m@user-pt5hl9rr7m2 ай бұрын
  • In a perfect world, this would be a really uplifting video, however.Even if our military naval hardware are as state of the art as claimed, there's a few massive problems. Our Royal Navy and it's fleet of fighting ships is so pathetically tiny, it's going to be useless against any modern, substantially large military naval forces it may have to fight, unless ( as with our army and royal air forces) they can miraculously be in 10 places at once.The other thing is...... Because the building and assembly contracts of our modern fighting ships are given to the cheapest bidders,a LARGE percentage of them are constantly not fit for purpose and being repaired. I often listen to people complaining about the number of foreign people who have settled in our country and I have to tell them something very important. This country has now got a population of well over 60 million, which means a hell of a lot more taxes and duties being plowed into the government, so...If the NHS has been stripped and stretched to breaking point, and our once mighty armed forces have been all but destroyed by the British government, where's all our money gone and going???????

    @grahamjones6106@grahamjones61064 ай бұрын
  • The Brits are great allies....I'm glad they're enjoying our F35 Lightning fighters. No one can build carriers like we can, though.

    @chrisdean6700@chrisdean67004 ай бұрын
    • The first carrier ever built was British; the UK has far more experience building ships than the US. It’s an island, a seafaring nation whose empire was built from its naval prowess dating back centuries.

      @OiOiSillyBoi@OiOiSillyBoi4 ай бұрын
    • You lost a lot at Midway Then Brit carriers Got your Back

      @leehotspur9679@leehotspur96794 ай бұрын
    • The Americans got there ideas for their amazing F35 hover aircraft from our British made harrier jump jet but still just as brilliant as our own hover jet but sadly not in service anymore and my favourite aircraft made by our US brothers and sisters is the tornado jet and my favourite US helicopter the apache gun ship not sure anyone will want to mess with and us British love our American family across the pond we work together share the same ideas together and build things ❤️ 🇬🇧🇺🇸

      @user-os5qv6tt9f@user-os5qv6tt9f4 ай бұрын
    • @@user-os5qv6tt9f Not only that, the actual lift fan in the F35 that enables its vertical takeoff and landing is made by Rolls Royce PLC (British owned - only the motors branch is German owned now). Over 30% of the aircraft is British made.

      @OiOiSillyBoi@OiOiSillyBoi4 ай бұрын
    • Education for you. Tornado was a British and German built jet,zero to do with USA!​@@user-os5qv6tt9f

      @MyScotty7@MyScotty74 ай бұрын
  • We maybe smaller these days but we are and always will the best 🇬🇧

    @stephensenior3589@stephensenior35894 ай бұрын
  • The Royal navy only has 12 warships that are available to be deployed.

    @leemacdonald6533@leemacdonald65334 ай бұрын
  • Why WWI and WWII clips?

    @glynluff2595@glynluff25954 ай бұрын
  • Nice.. gmg2 brown

    @steviebturtle@steviebturtle4 ай бұрын
  • Pity they can't patrol the channel.

    @markmeadows3485@markmeadows34854 ай бұрын
  • Fancy showing an aircraft carrier at sea flying the Union Jack, Royal Navy vessels at sea fly the White Ensign.

    @leub01@leub01Күн бұрын
  • A very informative video today. Tax money is utilized by the United Kingdom are used for an effective protection. 🇬🇧🙂👍🇺🇸

    @martinmarsola6477@martinmarsola64774 ай бұрын
    • Rubbish. It is used inefficiently & wasted. We pay ridiculous amounts for what we get.

      @grahamlongley8298@grahamlongley82984 ай бұрын
    • 🇺🇲👍. 🇬🇧🙌

      @Zubair-to2jq@Zubair-to2jq4 ай бұрын
  • I'm a little confused by the headline, What Threats ? Where ? What contested waters ?

    @Alien9828@Alien98284 ай бұрын
    • You're not the only one.

      @williamnovak6869@williamnovak68694 ай бұрын
    • The threat of 'Sirs' stuck in the safety of staff rooms, playing wargames on digital screens not having enough toy soldiers, grunts and tools to send to their deaths I believe and making us pay for it, for they say it is OUR war too.

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
  • 👍👍

    @Ralphie_Boy@Ralphie_Boy4 ай бұрын
  • This is content for children. Written by children. Primary age children, at that.

    @Mike7O7O@Mike7O7O21 күн бұрын
  • Lol, I think not deploying to the red sea to help global shipping against really small navies shows you ain't gonna deploy against Russia guaranteed.

    @tylerdurden4006@tylerdurden40064 ай бұрын
    • The Russian navy is not a blue water navy. The US and Royal navies are.

      @wasp6594@wasp65944 ай бұрын
    • We have deployed 3 ships, how much more do u want deployed...

      @EnglishScripter@EnglishScripter4 ай бұрын
    • @@EnglishScripter why have a "super" carrier if you are too scared to use it? What does it do besides waste money doing nothing?

      @tylerdurden4006@tylerdurden40064 ай бұрын
    • Wha.. because it is already being deployed elsewhere.. Whats the point of a carrier in the gulf?@@tylerdurden4006

      @EnglishScripter@EnglishScripter4 ай бұрын
  • Thay are building up the navy...but having difficulty in recruiting enough to run the ships,thay might be moth balling some because of that......apparently

    @johnwatts9932@johnwatts99324 ай бұрын
  • Financial overstretch, the RN reflects this pressure. Economic decline meets ever higher cost of its upkeep. The war in the Ukraine, has past its zenith, a political settlement, an unspoken as yet coming. A million lives lost, perhaps Russian and Ukrainian. Nato eastern expansion curtailed ? A game of thrones power tragedy. Except for arms manufacturers.

    @Aubury@Aubury4 ай бұрын
  • Does Russia still have Navy ships that stay above water?

    @rickrick196@rickrick1964 ай бұрын
    • Sure they do, but regardless of intended class of ship, they are used primarily as smoke screen vessels.

      @edwardhugus2772@edwardhugus27724 ай бұрын
  • The Uk are in trouble

    @anthonymichaelwilson8401@anthonymichaelwilson84014 ай бұрын
  • Is that western propaganda designed to keep the spirits high? Serious question! I immigrated to US 9 years ago and i can proudly call myself an American citizenand seeing a video about our allies being strong only makes me feel more secure and confident but i assume the russians and the chinese ppls have similar content floating around about north Korea operating 14 aircraft carriers or something like this.😂

    @hristohristov7491@hristohristov74914 ай бұрын
  • My ancestors migrated to the United States in the early 1800's from England. Being a history nut, I'm not a fan of the U.K. or any of those European countries. I don't understand how the U.S. can be allies with it's Natural enemy, the British. I find myself rooting for Russia over the British 9 out of 10 times. The UK has taught the world what not to do. If you love Freedom, the UK is not your friend.

    @QuigleySharps45@QuigleySharps452 ай бұрын
  • the Britsih Dreamers with their rusty failing metal coffins couldnt even win the proxy war. Theatre!

    @Davidnumber23@Davidnumber234 ай бұрын
  • Navy is far to small & the two carriers don't have cats & traps 🤦🏼‍♂️

    @gcarter1973@gcarter19734 ай бұрын
    • pretty sure they are built around the use of vtol fighters, so there isnt really the need as we dont use typhoons on the carriers

      @zamstig66@zamstig664 ай бұрын
    • @@zamstig66 the F35B is slower,.heavier & carries less fuel & weapons than the F35C that the US Navy use, & we've had to buy the F35B because carriers have no cats & traps. They are basically over sized US Marine carriers! Originally they were to have cats & traps that's why they are so big but the politicians go involved saying to expensive midway they the build! & We ended up with 2 oversized Vtol carriers.

      @gcarter1973@gcarter19734 ай бұрын
    • @@gcarter1973 F-35C cannot be refuelled by the RAF…..so for us the B has greater range. 😎 Our carriers are indeed more like USMC carriers….because that’s more like the role the RN serves. Why else do you think our carriers were designed to carry a large number of Royal Marines ? Why else do you think the USMC have already deployed onboard several times ? We simply cannot afford super carriers like the USN…..but we can do carriers far better than the USMC.

      @Bob10009@Bob100094 ай бұрын
    • @@Bob10009 even the French carrier is far better in every way than those 2 big sitting ducks

      @gcarter1973@gcarter19734 ай бұрын
    • @@gcarter1973 name a single way….

      @Bob10009@Bob100093 ай бұрын
  • I have full trust in the Navy

    @tonieveritt7045@tonieveritt70454 ай бұрын
    • Sure, the Navy's all right. The ones NOT to be trusted are a few echelons higher. They are called Johson, Sunak and Sir...

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
  • There is no doubt that technology plays role and at current state Russian Navy is no match for the Royal one. But when fuming Kuznetsov is putting shame on Russians we do have to ask how often is Queen Elizabeth air carrier is out to the sea? Repairs are taking longer than active duty. Then the next question is how many Astute subs are available and how many are functional? I do not believe that they are a match against quantities of Boreys and Yasens Russians have. And frankly, I think that the latter two are great boats - even Americans agree. But the biggest concern is that if it will come to direct battle then 6000 nuclear warheads Russians possess are somewhat overwhelming disbalance over 200 British ones. I wonder if this accident, God forbid, occurs will all these boats have a harbour or even a whole island to return to. Can we discuss what happens if one single Sarmat falls close? So what is the purpose of this spectacular Milky Way ad?

    @stolengoldenratio@stolengoldenratioАй бұрын
  • Ini bule ngomong apa sih wasweswos😊😊😊😊

    @alvianlee5079@alvianlee50793 ай бұрын
  • We always have tricks up our sleaves 👍

    @scottrowlands874@scottrowlands8744 ай бұрын
  • While laughing

    @David_Camerwrongun@David_Camerwrongun4 ай бұрын
  • Be aware of north korea.

    @user-qh8sp3zs9k@user-qh8sp3zs9kАй бұрын
  • We, the UK, love our colonial cousins

    @geoffrussell2471@geoffrussell247116 күн бұрын
  • I think all allies should be exercising their weaknesses within the military as a collective group. To expose nato short coming. Against all military adversary

    @UnderThreatNationNews5.0@UnderThreatNationNews5.04 ай бұрын
  • It's our people with the tech that makes the difference.

    @comedyshane@comedyshane4 ай бұрын
    • The Germans in WW2 believed that too...

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
  • Expliquer en français

    @Fenjy_Dalphinis@Fenjy_Dalphinis4 ай бұрын
    • study english.

      @Olizimm@Olizimm4 ай бұрын
    • @@Olizimm That's a great European union you advocate here friend... taking to your allies against evil Russia like that...tsk tsk.

      @MrDertien@MrDertien3 ай бұрын
  • Can these ships survive an EMP blast?

    @chrisseaborn4739@chrisseaborn47394 ай бұрын
    • EMP blast means nuclear war has started. None of us survive that.

      @Bob10009@Bob100094 ай бұрын
  • Hod bless the royal navy true patriots

    @adrianshjadesheehan9991@adrianshjadesheehan99914 ай бұрын
  • You have to admit the US has made some of the best aircraft in the world and the fastest like the RS super fast black bird spy plane that flies 2500 mph

    @user-os5qv6tt9f@user-os5qv6tt9f4 ай бұрын
    • Mostly British designs.

      @newton18311@newton183114 ай бұрын
    • Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird was retired from service in 1998/1999. 92% of those planes were made of titanium . Guess where that titanium covertly came from.

      @williamnovak6869@williamnovak68694 ай бұрын
    • @newton18311 really wow nice one yes us clever British have a lot too answer for and even the space shuttle the engine's also had something to do with the British as well i heard some years ago

      @user-os5qv6tt9f@user-os5qv6tt9f4 ай бұрын
    • @williamnovak6869 i wouldn't have a clue mate

      @user-os5qv6tt9f@user-os5qv6tt9f4 ай бұрын
    • @@user-os5qv6tt9f Britain was well Advanced of America and the world in Jet Engines, Planes ,Atomic research, That Knolage did not just stop and go away.

      @newton18311@newton183114 ай бұрын
  • 10% of content, 90% of meaningless empty words. Ever considered a career of a politician?

    @vmasing1965@vmasing19654 ай бұрын
  • Need to pull their finger out !!! I know its not the navy but the financial hub of the western world can only afford to send Ukrsine 60 million ?? absolute disgrace !!!

    @davidinmossy@davidinmossyАй бұрын
  • Britannia rules the waves 🌊

    @richowens600@richowens6004 ай бұрын
  • British navy belong to usa navy !! It one of the command center for usa navy .

    @lamnguyen-uj6lh@lamnguyen-uj6lh4 ай бұрын
    • I don't want to get into a slagging of match but your probably 90% British I don't understand how you are so quick to slag the UK off when your the one who so easily ditched your herratige 😢

      @user-js4mi8vw6q@user-js4mi8vw6q4 ай бұрын
  • Lots of people are saying we are not very good anymore only if they knew the truth

    @user-kq4hu9kt4q@user-kq4hu9kt4q4 ай бұрын
  • Total Number of Submarines by Country 2024 kzhead.info/sun/aLynZLmqjpGDma8/bejne.htmlsi=sJGI0W_xmjhlQbvH Strategy Channel : www.youtube.com/@strategy3d

    @worldnetworkhd3605@worldnetworkhd36054 ай бұрын
  • We were the best when I served, we are still the best Navy in the world, all nato navies train with us because we are still the best we offer better world domination training programs

    @joulesmorris6476@joulesmorris64764 күн бұрын
  • 😂😂😂😂😂🎉

    @user-qk6oo3ds9m@user-qk6oo3ds9m2 ай бұрын
  • And with all this firepower and tech. The actual enemy is Islam not Russia. Islamic

    @TheCashback@TheCashback4 ай бұрын
    • what ever beliefs you hold they will always be a problem with your opposite. Get rid of religion and ideology, and we live in a more peaceful lives in our world. We will never go any where if we dont work together.

      @leeparsons70@leeparsons7011 сағат бұрын
  • Russia very dangerous Country

    @afghanmilitaryofficer9877@afghanmilitaryofficer98772 ай бұрын
  • Haha, The Royal Navy carriers spend their time sailing around with no aircraft. Pathetic I call it!! Never mind Uncle Sam has their backs.

    @user-nh1ub7vq5z@user-nh1ub7vq5z4 ай бұрын
  • 😂😂😂👎

    @maxkazzora4234@maxkazzora42344 ай бұрын
  • Just watched More rhetorical propaganda

    @RobertJackson437@RobertJackson4373 ай бұрын
  • How clever are all of you!!Shame you!!distroying all planet!After said that klima ist hot....bla,bla!!

    @mariawagner3414@mariawagner34144 ай бұрын
  • Stay turned for Government Propaganda

    @explorecriminalminds@explorecriminalminds4 ай бұрын
  • Almighty God and Lord Jesus Christ please being this madness to end with your 😢😢😢😮😮holy spirit and love to all the world .in Master Jesus Christ holy name I pray Amen. Davidjohn.

    @davidjohn7735@davidjohn77354 ай бұрын
  • Don't count on the RN even being able to operate on a strategic level for too much longer. Our Civil Service and politicians ever since Cameron (or even since Blair) was PM, have deliberately been reducing ALL our forces, the RN first, to a point where they'll simply no longer have the necessary coherence to function effectively as an independent NATIONAL military. The intention, of course, is to eventually merge them in a pan-European force run by the repulsive EU institution. RATHER THAN SEE THAT, MANY OF US WOULD PREFER TO REPLICATE SWITZERLAND'S STANCE OF TOTAL, NON-ALIGNED NEUTRALITY

    @squirepraggerstope3591@squirepraggerstope35914 ай бұрын
KZhead