What’s happening in this Red Dragon movie clip?
FBI agent Will Graham (Edward Norton from Primal Fear, American History X and Fight Club) visits forensic psychiatrist Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins from The Lion in Winter, The Silence of the Lambs and The Elephant Man) to discuss a case. Graham has been working with Lecter on a psychological profile of a serial killer who removes edible body parts from his victims; Graham says he has realized the killer is a cannibal. Realizing Graham is close to discovering he is the killer, Lecter stabs him, but Graham fights back, stabbing and shooting Lecter before they both fall unconscious.
Rent or buy Red Dragon here: amzn.to/2W1YIIR
What’s the Red Dragon movie about?
In 1980, FBI agent Will Graham (Edward Norton from Primal Fear, American History X and Fight Club) visited forensic Hannibal Lecter (Anthony Hopkins from The Lion in Winter, The Silence of the Lambs and The Elephant Man) to discuss a case. Graham realizes that the killer is a cannibal, but Lecter stabs him. Lecter is imprisoned and Graham retires to Florida with his family. Years later, another serial killer, the Tooth Fairy, kills two families. Graham is asked for help by agent Crawford (Harvey Keitel from Bugsy and The Piano) and Graham concludes that he must consult with Lecter. The killer is Francis Dolarhyde (Ralph Fiennes from Schindler’s List, the Harry Potter saga and The Grand Budapest Hotel), and acts on the order of his alternate personality, whom he calls the Great Red Dragon. A letter from the Tooth Fairy is discovered hidden in Lecter's cell, expressing his admiration for Lecter and his interest in Graham. Dolarhyde has a relationship with Reba (Emily Watson from Breaking the Waves and Oranges and Sunshine) but her alternative personality requires him to kill her. Desperate to end the Dragon's control over him, Dolarhyde goes to the Brooklyn Museum, tears up Blake's painting and eats it. Later, Dolarhyde goes to Reba's house and learns that she has spent the evening with a colleague. Enraged, Dolarhyde kills him, kidnaps Reba, takes her to his house and sets it on fire. Unable to kill her, Reba escapes when the police arrive. Dolarhyde infiltrates Graham's house, takes his son hostage and threatens to kill him. To save his son, Graham reminds Dolarhyde of what he knows about his childhood. Enraged, the Dolarhyde attacks Graham. Both are seriously injured in a shoot-out, which ends when Graham's wife kills Dolarhyde.
Credits: © 2002 Universal Pictures
Like this video if you want to see more episodes and tell us what you thought in the comments below.
Don't forget to turn on notifications to catch our next videos!
Keep up with us on Facebook!
Binge Society | / bingesociety
Binge Society - Action | / binge.society.action
Binge Society - Comedy | / binge.society.comedy
Binge Society brings you the best of your favorite movies and TV shows! Here you will find iconic scenes, moments, and lines from all the films, characters, celebrities and actors you love. As movie fans, we give you content we know you will enjoy!
#reddragon #thriller #mystery #anthonyhopkins #edwardnorton #movieclip #hannibal #cannibal #killer #investigation #psychopath
Wow that doctor didn't take criticism well! I hope they catch the cannibal though...
😂
Lmao
incredible comment
I like to think Dr. Lecter left that book in obvious plain view for Graham to find-and even left the bookmark on the 'sweetbread' part wanting Graham to solve who the killer was while being actually killed by him. Oh Hannibal you and your poetic justice. He rather liked Graham and even sort of tries soothing him while he bleeds out.
Like the theory, but definitely not. Hannibal had no expectation Will was going to figure out it was him that day.
But it is weird that Lecter wrote "sweetbreads" in the book. In all likelihood, he is fluent in French.
@@theguywhoisaustralian1465 what does he call him before Will says he's not psychic?
@@mirzaghalib8659 "eidetiker" - person who has a photographic memory, though in this case Lecter's also talking about Will's talent for intuitive leaps & visualization. I still haven't seen this film, but in "Manhunter," William Peterson's version of Will Graham was portrayed as borderline psychic in his ability to "empathize" with the killer, same as Hugh Dancy's Will Graham in the few "Hannibal" TV episodes I saw
@@PrestigeLearning Yeah. The "whole this is my design" thing. They show that in this too especially in the climax when Will uses Dolarhyde's trauma against him.
He admired Will's Courage so he wanted to eat his heart
When Will speaks of Dr. Lecter's "disadvantage" the insanity of being caught, wanting someone he felt was a kindred to know what he did, what he was doing was all too alluring to not leave a clue; even if it meant he would kill Will; after the realization that Hannibal was in fact the killer they as a team were trying to capture. That was the insanity and the disadvantage; that strange duality.
"The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success." Will ALMOST caught Lecter. He didn't even suspect Lecter until he pieced it together from the book Lecter left behind. Lecter ALMOST got away with it. Him leading Will on a wild goose chase certainly implicated him. Will finding that book and getting stabbed confirmed it.
@@delanorrosey4730 He did suspect Lecter for not even proposing the idea that the killer is eating his victims. But, as he stated in their conversation later on in the movie, he failed to act on these suspicions until it was too late.
What he meant by that was Hannibal was too insane to see how he gave himself away. It wasn't just the book that did it, it was the fact that Hannibal seemingly never suggested the killer was cannibalizing people, which meant that he was also leading Will on and astray at earlier points for a reason. He also didn't really question or seem all too surprised at the realization of the killer eating people, even though it was actually quite a revelation. Hannibal behaved the way he did because he was completely confident that he was going to be able to take Will down, even though Will may have never made a connection to Hannibal had he simply left, Hannibal couldn't take that risk, and he let his insane side take over. He also made it a point to get Will's coat for him...which was a ploy to get a weapon. He didn't need to get Will's coat, such a thing would be superfluous and senseless, because Will could have just as easily got his own coat on his way out. So it was disguised as a polite gesture, because he knew Will said he was tired, he figured he could make such an excuse without raising alarm. An odd action, but not so odd that a person would immediately suspect a nefarious motive. It was a psychological manipulation. He also meant that Hannibal could have just killed him instead of trying to make it a thing. But Hannibal wanted to preserve him and carve him up for food, instead of just kill him, so he didn't go straight for the kill. Hannibal kills with technical skill maybe, but doesn't really kill efficiently, because he doesn't want to discard his kills, and he has a mindset going into it, so he only kills in specific ways, that are almost ritualistic in a way. He stabbed Will, but he didn't want him to feel much pain because he had respect for Will's ability to think like and understand him. Hannibal could have just stabbed him in the side and then quickly slit his throat. But his insanity wouldn't allow him to kill in that way, because his kills had to be very personal, 1 on 1, and ritualistic. That allowed Will to get the upper hand. Hannibal had grown soo used to killing, that it became soo easy, he never really even expected any surprises or a fight he couldn't handle. Will surprised him by being able to stab Hannibal back with his own arrows, in pretty much the same place Will was stabbed. The irony of this was not lost on Hannibal. So for all of Hannibal's intelligence, he was still too insane to just get rid of an imminent threat quickly without involving all the extra ritualism. For Hannibal, in a way, hunting down someone who was hunting him, was like the rush of a high, an ultimate trophy, which is why he said he'd eat Will's heart. Hannibal was angry that Will caught him, even lashing out at Will from inside his cell, unable to see or even admit to himself that it was his own fault. He kind of knew it in the back of his mind, but he didn't want to accept it. His anger at Will was almost artificial, like he was looking for an excuse to not blame himself.
I was that damn ponytail that threw Will off
My boy Will pulled that back up piece like a pro. 😎
One of the best scenes ever
Sinister nonsense
Hannibal's face when he says he's eating them. He's like your well off the mark.
Never underestimate a .38 snubbed nose. It can save your life.
In the book, Will switches to a Charter Arms Bulldog in 44 special. Specifically because the .38 failed to kill Lecter. Just some fun trivia.
Someone should have said this to John Lennon.
@@itzsal5739 I carry a S&W hammerless 640 .357 j-mag myself. Can be filled with .38, .38+P or .357 rounds so it will be very useful if ammo becomes scarce for whatever reason. It's still quite small unlike .44s and being both a revolver and hammerless it will never jam or snag if shot from say, a jacket pocket or something. All my firearms tend to be ones that can use a variety of different ammo though 12 gauge pump 3" or 2 3/4", .308 or 7.62x51 Nato rounds etc.
@@Seven_Leaf no one asked bro
There is always a weak spot in anyone , even in Hannibal !
Will got stabbed with a small knife and went down yet Hannibal got stabbed with arrows on the same spot yet kept going.
as with kinetic projectiles its always an issue of placement
Lecter actually gutted will in this scene. Later in the movie, you see that will has an 7-8 inch scar.
I wonder, if Will had stayed sitting and not wandered around to find the book would Lecter still have tried to kill him? I've always thought that he wouldn't but now I'm not so sure
I always thought the fact he returned without Will’s jacket was the telling part, after saying he was going to get it for him, that he just returned with a knife showed it didn’t matter if Will had found that book or not. He intended to kill him either way.
I always wondered that too. I feel like he was going to kill him regardless because he was closing in on Lector. Even if he hadn't read that book he could tell Will was not far from figuring it out and it was only a matter of time.
I think Will knew too much, he might not have intended to kill him if he didn’t say the whole “you don’t strike me as the type to make mistakes”. Once he heard that he must have thought it was only a matter of time before he might realize.
He would have killed him. It was obvious during the conversion that Will could have an insight at pretty much any moment, with or without any further clue. He said he ”almost had it” during the conversation itself. Also, Hannibal didn't want Will to tell the others about the cannibal thing (that's why Hannibal asked if he had told the others).
@@xyhmo That was the best line. He does it with perfect casual innocence, without arousing suspicion. So hard to do with a question like, "You haven't shared our secret with anyone else yet, have you? Good, then it dies with you.."
My estimation of Hannibal as a man just freaking plummeted.
You didn't spend 20 years in the can t9 have this happen
You ate cheese of the radiator
@@ebo2o215 - that animal Blundetto
@@unclephilly2127 you. Know what he called jenny
I came into a tissue
I love this scene so much. Edward's so adorable. Dr. Hannibal said it well, the boy is indeed remarkable. Great ending!
An excellent bit of direction: Will's hand brushes the arrow feathers, foreshadowing his hands on them later, and then when will first falls down the only other thing that moves in the shot is the arrows as they bounce. Finally, they're the only other object in view besides the characters in their last moment in frame before will uses them to stab Hannibal.
I’ve never been alone in a room with Anthony Hopkins.
"No, I know I'm not smarter than you." "Then how did you catch me?" "You stabbed me, indicating that you are probably the killer."
What an awesome movie
hannibal is fucking invincible what the fuck dude gets stabbed and shot multiple times and he just walks fine LMAO
Disgraceful language on a KZhead channel that allows the youth to watch
@@matimus100 naturally a movie about a cannibalistic serial killer is mainly intended for the youth
@@matimus100 its not the use of profanity per se, but the idea that these kids think they are the first humans on the planet to punctuate their thoughts with overemphasis, with oaths and ejaculations implying strong emotions
@@rickdeckard1075you call them humans ? primate
@@senpaiii623 no zero excuses and none given
You have good heart! Always eat the good stuff
My one criticism of this scene: I wish Lecter wasn't wearing shoes, as a nod to the Red Dragon novel.
And Will Graham should have been on the phone when Lecter stabbed him.
Great to be seen 100 times
He has a strange gift of seeking the minor flaw in the over-all perfection and dealing with it. My hat is off to you Doctor.
Has anyone ever thought that if you look at the injuries sustained by each person. Lecter would have woke up first, and he somehow still got arrested?
My client did not have a gun!! Police brutality!!!!😅😂😂
Great scene in modern cinema.
"I think I'll eat ur heart, awwwl !"
Why would Will expect anyone, even a forensic psychologist, to make the jump from missing body parts to someone cooking and eating them? Post-Silence of the Lambs, yeah, maybe. But before? Give me a break … lol
Because missing body parts only leave two options. Trophy hunting or cannibalism. So for a top psychologist to completely leave out the second is weird at best. On top of that organs is a very uncommon trophy. Trophies are usually things that are easy to maintain (eg skulls, horns, skin or pelts etc) and organs are almost always eaten and are very highly prized both among hunter tribes and the animal kingdom in general.
@@shadearca Wow. You’ve thought about that in much more detail than I ever have. Might explain why the FBI never called me back for that second interview …
Never heard of Albert Fish huh?
ThT was too close ! Too close to being a dinner 🥘!
Remarkable boy , I do admire you , I think I'll eat your heart.
Always carry the back-up
Imaginn esto una caterva de viola2 y plotu2 llamando la atención , quiero admirar esta obra de arte y aparece los cabezas de viola2 y plotu2 ,Lean banditas
In the book its a linoleum knife but i like this version better, its more surgical and almost humane
Nice homage to SOTLs with those insects.
Nice Homage to Larousse with that book of recipes. Nice homage to the native Americans with them arrows. Nice homage to hte NRA with that convenient gun. Nice homage to steven segal with that stupid little ponytail. Nice homage to psychiatry and behavioural science with the whole damn scene.
@@whynottalklikeapirat No way man, Lecter definitely thought of the ponytail first. Seagal just added the oily hair dye.
What's wrong with sweetbreads? Mmmmm🐽
3:25 lol
2:50
It was an great Chemie ⚗ 😂
Man, that was a pretty crazy mishap. I think Hannibal might be the cannibal Will is looking for.
Findet die Wahrheit raus... Lach... Das war alles nicht hart genug.... Ich durfte nicht arbeiten.... Grins...
Idk but I'm not very convinced by Norton's acting in this film. And christ what is Hannbial lector like Michael Myers now?
Agree with you on the Norton part. And about Hannibal, tbh, humans can be sometimes incredibly and surprisingly resistant to damage. Given that Hannibal's descriptions often border on the brink of supernatural, imo such a scene can be forgiven
Bruce Willis father and borther.
Correct me if I'm wrong but is lecter saying will is a EMPATH MUTANT OR A GIFTED HUMAN THAT POSSESSES EMPATHY???
He saying he is good at placeing himself in killers and psycopaths shoes And most people are unable to understand psycopaths or insane people
It's a little confusing, because the word he says is "Eideteker", which means someone with an eidetic memory (basically photographic memory), which makes sense as a response to Will having a flash of the photos of the one victim after seeing the chicken get cut up, but it doesn't really match with Hannibal's immediate next line, which is more along the lines of saying that Will has great empathy and ability to put himself in the mindset of someone different from himself.
I really love this movie.
Then the book on gastronomy dialed 911
There are a lot of sweaty lines in this scene. “All the body parts used in cooking” - What he describes are common offal ingredients. They are not parts used in cooking. Virtually all body parts are used in cooking.
I think he means they are parts one would generally select as prime or specific parts used for cooking, like how there's a best part of a cow. Especially when it comes to human meat, because we're not exactly like other animals, most of our meat is too fatty or under developed or tough due to our modern way of living, and he also wasn't just choosing anyone for their parts, he was selecting specific people because of their features in these parts, like finding the best cow for slaughter if you want a specific part of the cow. So he was visually judging the quality of the meat on areas of people, to decide what best to take, but was also doing it in a ritualistic and very specific way. Pretty much any part from any random person would have been pretty much as "good" as any other, but he wanted the ones that specifically caught his eye.
@@peoplez129 “liver, kidney, tongue, thymus… all parts used in cooking” - None of these parts are “prime”. None are any more likely to be used in cooking than any other part of any animal’s edible muscle, bone or organs. In fact, all are typically less desirable than the traditional prime cuts that would immediately come to the mind of a layman as be “parts used in cooking”. That is what makes the line sweaty.
He who lives by the sword dies by the Sword the law Karma .
Olor a pedo , VIENDO
Wait so Hanibal was the killer?!?
Lmao
I was a chef for almost 40years and the Larusse Gastronomique was our bible
How's it going today my friends I am an atheist as well
Was there ever a worse actor than Edward Norton? It's too awful to watch
What are you nuts? DeCafrio is the most overrated. Jack Dawson in every movie.
i dont get it, I thought it was decent.
The Rock.
What drugs are you on? He's a good actor
@@TheBatman135 But NOT for this character (rol)....! Period!