Tu 160 - The strategic Bomber which India is eyeing | What is India preparing for? | WION Game Plan

2023 ж. 11 Мам.
407 813 Рет қаралды

Strategic bombers are combat aircraft designed to fly deep into enemy territory to destroy strategic targets and India is keen on acquiring these. India eyes the world’s biggest bomber aircraft, the Russian Tupolev Tu-160. What’s this bomber all about? What is India preparing for?
Watch Game Plan with Shivan Chanana
#gameplan #Tu-160 #tupolev
About Channel:
WION The World is One News examines global issues with in-depth analysis. We provide much more than the news of the day. Our aim is to empower people to explore their world. With our Global headquarters in New Delhi, we bring you news on the hour, by the hour. We deliver information that is not biased. We are journalists who are neutral to the core and non-partisan when it comes to world politics. People are tired of biased reportage and we stand for a globalized united world. So for us, the World is truly One.
Please keep discussions on this channel clean and respectful and refrain from using racist or sexist slurs and personal insults.
Subscribe to our channel at goo.gl/JfY3NI
Check out our website: www.wionews.com
Connect with us on our social media handles:
Facebook: / wionews
Twitter: / wionews
Follow us on Google News for the latest updates
Zee News:- bit.ly/2Ac5G60
Zee Business:- bit.ly/36vI2xa
DNA India:- bit.ly/2ZDuLRY
WION: bit.ly/3gnDb5J
Zee News Apps: bit.ly/ZeeNewsApps

Пікірлер
  • For the US, in the long term India could pose challenges in world business order, key decisions etc because of its independence approach. US wants India to be a Market place only. Not a technology producer or maker. US wants India to depend on them. Hence, India should balance both US, Russia, France and other countries in terms of defence planning.

    @sudhakarv9@sudhakarv9 Жыл бұрын
    • 1.4 billion people still cannot make their own bomber.

      @kevinjaitejmontbose5377@kevinjaitejmontbose5377 Жыл бұрын
    • By Russia junk🤣

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
    • India the emperor with no cloths. .. india eyes on "strategic Bomber" , "strategic ship" .. you name it. .. but that's about it. .. india always lives in present tense. .. you never heard that lndia has accomplished anything they always either "eyes" or "is eying" ... to be .. what??!! .. SUPA' POWER:2020??!!🤣🤣

      @akhanddbangladesh8274@akhanddbangladesh8274 Жыл бұрын
    • What defence plan? You all said Ukraine should surrender, so I would assume you would do the same. But don’t worry, we will abstain.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@akhanddbangladesh8274 Who is talking? What you know about india. You must be a Jihadi or CCP useless begger

      @sumo890@sumo890 Жыл бұрын
  • It's India's decision, a sovereign country, developing their own defence capabilities.

    @rogerhammett5295@rogerhammett5295 Жыл бұрын
    • yes it is only tu-160 is a obsolete bomber

      @Noodleanrgry@Noodleanrgry Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@Noodleanrgry bro needs a functioning brain

      @mulla_impotent@mulla_impotent Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@Noodleanrgry how many countries actually built this kind of bomber, Obsolete technology means what, you might using new technology, old technology is also good, There is no obsolete technology,

      @rakesharamaiah2737@rakesharamaiah2737 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@Noodleanrgry Are you out of your mind?? That thing can bring the entire EU to its feet

      @ravitejshanbhag12@ravitejshanbhag12 Жыл бұрын
    • @@rakesharamaiah2737 there is no time to build a new bomber for india but in my opinion india should go for b 1 lancers cuz Russia is still recovering from the war and is quite a bit behind in the arms race these days , we should make allies with US as there is some increasing heat between US and china which will benifit us (enemies enemy is our friend). i m not telling to throw russia fully off but in times of war they are not able to give parts and components for the IAF. we should always keep a big boi behind our back at all times like we kept russia these years

      @Megh_Vachhani@Megh_Vachhani Жыл бұрын
  • Yes! India should definitely go for a strategic bomber squadron. What with mean neighbors all around us. Jai Hind 🇮🇳

    @parthoghosh5809@parthoghosh5809 Жыл бұрын
    • Your neighbours'feelings are mutual. Mean and belligerent India is no good for peace as it would invite American werewolves to foment more strife and discord .

      @angkukuey007@angkukuey007 Жыл бұрын
    • Big LoL

      @soumyadipjana5119@soumyadipjana5119 Жыл бұрын
    • Oh no.. India will fill up this bomber with human feces (it produced plenty of) and rain terror on its neighbors... Turning its neighbors to be like India.. such a terrifying outcome..

      @IndiAnFasod@IndiAnFasod Жыл бұрын
    • India has no need for strategic bombers...all our enemies are at arms length

      @rasputin774@rasputin774 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes! India should either acquire or co-produce newly built Tu 160 and Tu 22 with Indian electronics.

    @Desire123ification@Desire123ification Жыл бұрын
    • Yes the electronic warfare suite should be indigenously made for better interoperability.

      @bikaripaxtan4746@bikaripaxtan4746 Жыл бұрын
    • India should acquire tu 160 but with better engines. Indigenously built engines

      @zephyrabysstrinity@zephyrabysstrinity Жыл бұрын
    • Tu 22 enough..

      @John_honai1@John_honai14 ай бұрын
  • The US is with India for its interest whereas Russia has been by our side the whole time when we needed them so it's better to go with Russia than the US

    @pauriagum2095@pauriagum2095 Жыл бұрын
    • Compared to USA, the 🇷🇺federation has a common fear along with India, and it's China. Pakistan is not of a great deal for a combined arms operation with India. Whereas USA seeks opportunity to install new bases in India, have a certain control over political decisions, were Russia doesn't want to interfere because it's not their matter

      @JolaNat@JolaNat Жыл бұрын
    • If India want buy Tu-160 can’t low loop in skirmishes.. China easy Radar detect track Tu-160 very loud engine than B-1 lancer very low and low loop.. China hard detect track B-1 very low loop Stealth mask..

      @f-35lightningii6@f-35lightningii6 Жыл бұрын
    • @Pauriagum What Russia are you talking about? It is the USSR who saved you in 1971 and the leader was Ukrainian Leonid Brezhnev. Why are indians cheering when russia is killing Ukrainians?

      @ORCs-R-Idiots@ORCs-R-Idiots Жыл бұрын
    • You clearly know not all details ? russia never have bin India's friend. same for Russia india is just a market with easy acces as they could not get Western weapons in past. BTW now India is dropping almost all russian made weapond and buying Western Kit (more reliable and of better quality)

      @Noodleanrgry@Noodleanrgry Жыл бұрын
    • At the end of the day, India will have India's interests, even if it means turning on Russia. What India needs to understand is that the U.S has no friends, only vassal states.

      @outsiderfrancis5979@outsiderfrancis5979 Жыл бұрын
  • Fact is this TU160 is a formidable long range super sonic bomber even the west admits it and India should acquire it.

    @ibrahimmoncada2710@ibrahimmoncada2710 Жыл бұрын
    • Absolutely correct

      @pagan-540@pagan-540 Жыл бұрын
    • But i guess b2 is more advanced

      @shauryashukla6805@shauryashukla6805 Жыл бұрын
    • @@shauryashukla6805 ..Alright get the pentagon to sell it to India and to throw some F35 to sweeten the deal

      @ibrahimmoncada2710@ibrahimmoncada2710 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ibrahimmoncada2710 yes talks are going on between me and Pentagon.

      @shauryashukla6805@shauryashukla6805 Жыл бұрын
    • @@shauryashukla6805 ..Insolent

      @ibrahimmoncada2710@ibrahimmoncada2710 Жыл бұрын
  • The US wants India to be weak. However, India deserves to be strong and well represented both diplomatically and militarilly by the UNSC permanent member seat and a fully developed nuclear triad including long-range strategic aviation. No doubt Tu-160 is the right choice!

    @petrsovicka@petrsovicka Жыл бұрын
    • Go with Russia and you will be like them 🤣🇺🇸

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
    • @@UncleTonyshotsauce Yeap, you've hit that man! Go with Russia to be treated as an equal! Go with America and you'll never be like them. They will always see you as their servant or worse as a slave.

      @petrsovicka@petrsovicka Жыл бұрын
    • Go with Russia and you'll find yourself in a very small very weak alliance with a nation that likes to try and throw what little weight it has left around. It kicks off and your axis powers 2 but much weaker than the originals

      @ricardosmythe2548@ricardosmythe2548 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ricardosmythe2548 The Axis Powers 2.0 is the US with its dependencies like Germania (aka the EU) and the exEmpire (soon to be the Kingdom of England only following the Irish reunification and Scotland independence)... Imho I can't see any banks crashing anywhere else than in the US...

      @petrsovicka@petrsovicka Жыл бұрын
    • @@petrsovicka the west is overwhelmingly more powerful than any alliance that could be formed against it. Its not even close. NI and Scotland will remain a part if the UK. I take it your not up to date on news regarding the Scottish nationalist party 🤣

      @ricardosmythe2548@ricardosmythe2548 Жыл бұрын
  • As lndia is currently building it's indigeneous Nuclear powered SSN & SSBN Submarines to acquire lethal underwater sea power, it's a strategic move to also acquire lethal air power by having it's own long range strategic power. India has a victorious, professional & battle-hardened army has shown in all it's previous wars & recently in Galwan whereby 60-70 invading chinese soldiers were butchered in face to face & hand to hand combat whereas lndia's casualties was due to coward ambush on them under the cover of darkness plus slipped & fall down the slopes. With the lethal weapons & assets, the lndian Army shall cement their might further.

    @ferliexstanislaus5593@ferliexstanislaus5593 Жыл бұрын
    • Those little Chinese 🐒 are no match to the tough Sikh Indians. Jai Hind 🇮🇳❤🙏 Love from An Afghan

      @dawood2u@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
    • ​@John Turner what please..

      @Kaushal_M1998@Kaushal_M1998 Жыл бұрын
    • Lol.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
    • Fact is this TU160 is a formidable long range super sonic bomber even the west admits it and India should acquire it ..

      @ibrahimmoncada2710@ibrahimmoncada2710 Жыл бұрын
    • Oh you were there and saw what happened? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

      @Travis26X@Travis26X Жыл бұрын
  • India should make its own bombers. Our engineers are very much capable to build a world class lethal and effective long range bomber.

    @mailforsudarshan@mailforsudarshan Жыл бұрын
    • It took 40 years to make a weak teja plane which no one wants with USA engine look at turkey tfx fighter 5th generation fighter

      @oliurrahman9103@oliurrahman9103 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@oliurrahman9103 Random Pakistani beggar spotted ..😅

      @slayypoint126@slayypoint126 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@oliurrahman9103It's was in Congress Era.Till Modi ji is there he will push aatmanirbhaar bharath

      @jothimurugan2319@jothimurugan2319 Жыл бұрын
    • @@oliurrahman9103 It was our first aircraft made to replace the mig21, its primary role was to put an aircraft devolopment system inplace, and the tejas is quite capable as compared to its rival the jf17, and the mk2 is coming in 6 years, which is a way shorter devolopment, so that system is now in place.

      @arjunsarkart@arjunsarkart21 күн бұрын
  • Problem with western defence equipments, especially US, is that they come with a lot of terms and conditions, then Pentagon decides where and against whom they are being used for, even when you purchase it in full price.

    @ajay262134@ajay262134 Жыл бұрын
  • India is a sovereign state and they could pursue any military relationship and procure hardware from whoever they want. The US needs to understand that...

    @kevinearle8955@kevinearle8955 Жыл бұрын
    • India is a giant 3rd world country with delusions of grandeur.

      @donaldcarey114@donaldcarey114 Жыл бұрын
  • It isn't about entering enemy airspace. It's about carrying enough long range missiles to a place from where they can hit areas of great importance to the enemy. Like, the Chinese heartland on the SE coast. And of course, covering the entire Indian Ocean, so now Chinese Navy fleet would dare enter. Yes..we definitely need a squadron!

    @gauravtripathi2643@gauravtripathi2643 Жыл бұрын
    • Based the squadron off of andaman and nicobar islands lol

      @spectra2005@spectra2005 Жыл бұрын
    • India would have to pay Chinese Yuan to Russia said no more junk Rupees..

      @jimmylam9846@jimmylam9846 Жыл бұрын
    • @@jimmylam9846 cry more

      @adityasharma3093@adityasharma3093 Жыл бұрын
  • I would like Indian Navy to have these as a cruise missile carrier. A single bomber of this kind is more powerful than any frigate that Indian Navy has. Moreover it can fly beyond Mach 2.

    @SunnySikdar@SunnySikdar Жыл бұрын
    • Large Aircraft carrying capability from a Naval Carrier is challenging.

      @shirkedance@shirkedance Жыл бұрын
    • @@shirkedance these can be operated from the shores like P8i

      @csourav01@csourav01 Жыл бұрын
  • This is a good idea however India 🇮🇳 must take decision very seriously and spend a lot and wisely this could be a game changer in a war may India get the best and a lot of them

    @jaimejimenez4199@jaimejimenez4199 Жыл бұрын
  • India must be aatmanirbhar in every sphere of defence . Till then what is our immediate need to win a war must be procured . Both short term and long term needs .

    @Def-senaRaksha-sg9ig@Def-senaRaksha-sg9ig Жыл бұрын
  • yes for self defense and protect the country JAI HIND

    @AnilKumar-kt5wo@AnilKumar-kt5wo Жыл бұрын
    • @@VoltarStarman toilet will be build with the saved money i think india has to dump american weapons and buy cheap russian as india have to build toilets

      @jj-uo9ti@jj-uo9ti Жыл бұрын
  • It is not what the us thinks India should do. It is rather what India thinks it needs that only matters. JAI HIND 🇮🇳

    @ajitnairk010@ajitnairk010 Жыл бұрын
    • Go with Russia please 🤣🇺🇸

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
  • India must have a squadron of long-distance bombers to support large-scale targeted aerial bombings.

    @rajasingammuthusamy959@rajasingammuthusamy959 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes,! India should have strategic bomber, to counter enemies 💪

    @shiyaritripura777@shiyaritripura777 Жыл бұрын
  • It is a good idea to have 3 squadrons of TU-160 - one in the East, one in the west and one in the South - all adapted for the needs of the region, including fast mobilised convoys while the squadron in the South is modified for destroying warships and air craft carriers. However, T-160 must fit into a more modern scenario wherein the squadrons are supported by long range missiles that can reach targets intended for T-160. Missiles can be modified for live relay of images to command centers with capability to reprogram these missiles to circle and strike targets from behind enemy lines ahead of T-160 take off.

    @beldeusingh483@beldeusingh483 Жыл бұрын
    • It's managing resources, we need to acquire 114 Rafales(24 for Navy), additional 50 mk1a, Then AMCA, with an eye to replace, migs, jaguar mirages, so 1squardrons like mig25 will serve the purpose.

      @aelredsaizar7976@aelredsaizar7976 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@aelredsaizar7976nice joke 114 rafale overly priced jets 🤦🏽‍♂️ why not the foldable FA 18 block 3 I don't think the MK1A will have any use instead of just defence AMCA will take 200 million years for its first flight 🤷🏽‍♂️

      @L.K.P_@L.K.P_ Жыл бұрын
    • Lot of Talk. Usual Desi habit. First learn how to stop shooting down your own choppers. So called surgical strike was abject failure and an embarrassment.

      @AG-dk6qb@AG-dk6qb Жыл бұрын
    • @@AG-dk6qb cope harder dumbo

      @adityasharma3093@adityasharma3093 Жыл бұрын
  • It's a must for our Great Country. Good choice,right choice n super choice.

    @mechimvukoza9118@mechimvukoza9118 Жыл бұрын
  • We need it 🙏

    @monoramabhowmick4699@monoramabhowmick4699 Жыл бұрын
    • better buy other T160 is aobsolete bomber and can no longer be build. russia will sell only refurbished models from aging stocks

      @Noodleanrgry@Noodleanrgry Жыл бұрын
  • Aum.India ... Yes yes Magic magic.. You must and you will ..move in this direction ...

    @mahavishnunaiker4490@mahavishnunaiker4490 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, India must have all the formidable weapon systems.

    @sivarajendras@sivarajendras Жыл бұрын
  • It is very much necessary to have heavy bombers. It can make crippling damage to enemies target with help of flankers.

    @sambanthamkarunakaran360@sambanthamkarunakaran360 Жыл бұрын
    • Flankers 🤦🏽‍♂️🤣 Who can't even lock a single paki jet in 2019 btw I'm indian paki mat bol dena 😂

      @L.K.P_@L.K.P_ Жыл бұрын
  • Definitely India must opt for strategic bombers as far as US B1 lancer is being concerned it's much costlier than Tu-160 and it has less range than Russian one as per India's requirement for two front war India can opt for Russia one but the deal must be considered or proceed under the test and trails

    @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7@013_rohandwivedi_aiml7 Жыл бұрын
    • Well you have Russian tanks because they are cheap, so I guess you should go for cheap airplanes too. They may be crap but cheap is good.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
    • @@ThePedroski007 if you are so reluctant to give weapons to India just slash their cost by 30 percent otherwise just keep mum. One month before your hypersonic Missile program failed ya that's cheapness you mentioned. Multiple HIMARS destroyed in Ukraine ya that's cheapness. We will buy weapons from any country Russia Israel Korea France as per our own convenience you wouldn't have to worry. Having weapons doesn't means that you are superpower unless and until you don't know how to use it and which weapon to use it in which situation. It's better to keep your advice with you. Thanks

      @013_rohandwivedi_aiml7@013_rohandwivedi_aiml7 Жыл бұрын
    • @@suryaprasanth9105 wow, Ukraine is still struggling to contain the second army in the world? Imagine that. Anyway, at least they are winning.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
    • I'd nato goes full scale then Russia use poseidon, tsar bomba.. This is the best way to weak Russia and eliminate..Strategically nato play a game.. Zelenesky is the puppet.. Russian leader also saying this🤔🤔

      @s.d.jayasundara5319@s.d.jayasundara5319 Жыл бұрын
    • @@s.d.jayasundara5319 lol, nato haven’t even put their boots on yet. Ukraine are winning so keep supporting the loser, loser.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, we must have them

    @ramanujahs513@ramanujahs513 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, India has a right to must defend its national strategic interests.

    @azizaziz5621@azizaziz56218 ай бұрын
  • For sure India should have the Stratgeic bombers so that Bharath will have an edge over the other two rivals and the superiority of the bombers gives more advantages to our tri forces.

    @kotragantisreekanth8382@kotragantisreekanth8382 Жыл бұрын
  • For Any strong country self-relying capabilities are far more important than allied trust in diplomacy

    @VishnuMaayan@VishnuMaayan Жыл бұрын
  • Why not!! Sure, we need it very badly. India 🇮🇳 keep moving

    @wandersworld-pg@wandersworld-pg Жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely. Immediate requirement

    @indrajitchatterjee7018@indrajitchatterjee7018 Жыл бұрын
  • Why not B1B lancers. I mean US is offering those. It's totally unwise to buy Russian hardware given current situation since acquiring spares for these will become a headache

    @satyakiray8588@satyakiray8588 Жыл бұрын
    • US is not trust worthy, They don't give integrate our missile, Our Bramhos missile made with Russia, how can we integrate with B1 bomber

      @rakesharamaiah2737@rakesharamaiah2737 Жыл бұрын
    • Coz The US isn't trustable at all at any cost they just betray using some pathetic tricks up their sleeves

      @Lucifer.__.@Lucifer.__. Жыл бұрын
  • Yes we need

    @prasannakumarnair5118@prasannakumarnair5118 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes , Offcourse, As an Indian we want to see , we have Bomber

    @saroruhagoswami9202@saroruhagoswami9202 Жыл бұрын
  • B1 is more modern but it comes in with an unreliable supplier. Tu-160 is older but comes in with a reliable supplier. Lets see what the IAF thinks.

    @Gorkhali_01@Gorkhali_01 Жыл бұрын
    • 😄😁👌

      @sandipkamat5604@sandipkamat5604 Жыл бұрын
  • India's air force and U.S air force are neck to neck. But it's not what you think. 27th February U.S started - Black Hawk helicopter crashes on Alabama highway during a flight-training mission, killing all onboard 17th March India responded - Two pilots killed after Army’s Cheetah helicopter crashes near Arunachal’s 29th March - USA responded - Nine soldiers died after two Blackhawk helicopters from Fort Campbell crashed in Kentucky 23rd April - USA again started - US Army helicopters crash in Alaska, killing 3 soldiers 4th May - India gave a befitting reply - Indian Army chopper with 3 onboard crashes in Jammu and Kashmir's Kishtwar district 5th May - USA responded to that reply - U.S F-16 downed near North Korea 8th May - India's counters back with - IAF's flying coffin MiG-21 crashes near Hanumangarh in Rajasthan; three killed.

    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai@Indian_Kumar_Poombai Жыл бұрын
    • Last time i checked, China holds the monopoly in driving battle tanks over their own citizens packed in a square. Self goal 101.

      @sirpatriarch8122@sirpatriarch8122 Жыл бұрын
    • What about 700 crashed J8 ? Wonder how many pilots have died, these jets are still in use and many even dont have ejection seats

      @maverickbeyondlimits9847@maverickbeyondlimits9847 Жыл бұрын
    • @Eshwesha Shawn so your high on something, i dont remember India even operated more than 500 of mig 21 s

      @maverickbeyondlimits9847@maverickbeyondlimits9847 Жыл бұрын
    • @Eshwesha Shawn idiot 🤣, crash reports dont come easily outside of china, as per your logic if india lost 8937 mig 21s imagine china must have lost least 800 of their j8 🤣

      @maverickbeyondlimits9847@maverickbeyondlimits9847 Жыл бұрын
    • 0

      @rabiahmed3529@rabiahmed3529 Жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely !

    @binitbhatt1981@binitbhatt1981 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes very much required

    @amethysturanus6351@amethysturanus6351 Жыл бұрын
  • US machines are damn expensive. Why would we go with that? They can suck their thumb if they aren’t pleased with us deciding what’s good for us.

    @karthikdevanahalli@karthikdevanahalli Жыл бұрын
    • Because it's the best 🇺🇸

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
    • Stick with Russia 🤣

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
    • @@UncleTonyshotsauce US made machines might be or might not be better than Russian made. We ain't fighting Russia or America. And China is the only country we need to be prepared for. So strategically and economically Russian made works for us. Also US has at many a times denied weapons to India and chose to make deals with our neighbouring terrorist nation. You know the country that was harbouring the guy that bombed America's twin towers.

      @karthikdevanahalli@karthikdevanahalli Жыл бұрын
    • @@paul_jmr8022 Hmm the bubbles people live in!!

      @karthikdevanahalli@karthikdevanahalli Жыл бұрын
  • Long time since India had bombers. in fact, India should start building its own Bomber prototype asap. If we can send rocket to market, we can certainly build a bomber. Only thing that holds us back is political will. There is no dearth of talent.

    @fun3721@fun3721 Жыл бұрын
    • How about feeding their people first?

      @chris_anon88@chris_anon88 Жыл бұрын
    • @@chris_anon88 Just because there is poverty doesnt mean people dont get to eat. Poverty is everywhere in this globe. Use your brains to think if you have any. Dont use your ass to think.

      @fun3721@fun3721 Жыл бұрын
    • @@chris_anon88 our people are well fed , what are u talking about?

      @archismaanrudra876@archismaanrudra876 Жыл бұрын
    • @@chris_anon88 how about you feed your people first?

      @dankseid3793@dankseid3793 Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@chris_anon88how about keep your mouth shut ,and find your identity

      @dgnsfjstjstjsykstjstjfabzf777@dgnsfjstjstjsykstjstjfabzf777 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes we need that

    @onelife7698@onelife7698 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes An airforce bomber squad for India is realy a great magic

    @unpredictedlife3747@unpredictedlife3747 Жыл бұрын
  • 7. As a member of the public, I want to extend my deepest appreciation to all the charge inventors for their dedication and hard work. Your efforts have created an amazing and unforgettable experience that surpasses all expectations. This event is a perfect example of leadership and innovation, and it showcases your passion and commitment to your craft. We are in awe of1. As a member of the audience, let's take a moment to acknowledge the tremendous time and effort invested in this production. I want to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the dedicated inventors for their remarkable work. Your passion and impressive dedication do not go unnoticed, and they make a significant difference in the guests' experience. We appreciate your commitment to your craft and recognize the long hours you put in, often without breaks. Your hard work is truly amazing and deserves our utmost appreciation.

    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai@Indian_Kumar_Poombai Жыл бұрын
  • White Swan ❤

    @Burebista_82-44B.C@Burebista_82-44B.C Жыл бұрын
    • More like white duck goose 🤣🇺🇸

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
    • @@UncleTonyshotsauce that's B2 🤣🤣🤣

      @Burebista_82-44B.C@Burebista_82-44B.C Жыл бұрын
  • Yes definitely we need it. To strengthen our forces.

    @chetanbharat6766@chetanbharat6766 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, India certainly needs a strategic bomber squadron. Jai Hind

    @guptraja@guptraja Жыл бұрын
  • 8 December 2021, an Indian helicopter carrying lndia's most senior commander as well as many of lndia's most highest ranking captains, generals, officers, chiefs, squadron leaders all onboard crashed resulting in the death of all 14 passengers. If lndia can't even guarantee their highest military commander a safe short and simple 6 minute flight, how can they possibly accomplish anything?

    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai@Indian_Kumar_Poombai Жыл бұрын
    • Yeah... I hope Chinese are not involved in that sabotage which led to a crash. By the way, In Wuhan Virus crisis how many people did Chinese communist party slaughtered who were resisting China's zero covid policy...We would never know as china is all about crushing free thinking voices.

      @kumarprabhakar3751@kumarprabhakar3751 Жыл бұрын
    • The largest real estate scam in the world just unfolded in China. When China can't sort out such critical stuff at their own home, they shouldn't meddling in other's affairs.

      @sirpatriarch8122@sirpatriarch8122 Жыл бұрын
    • Mishaps happen when machinery is involved didn't the USA astronauts get blown to shreds in their space shuttle ?? ... does that mean USA can't make reentry vehicles meant for multiple space missions. So get off the high horse and understand the basic rule of evolution, you evolve after failures... With a 30 tn debt are you saying USA is a perfect example of financial prudence ??... USA wasn't built in a day and India inspite sanctions of technology transfers is evolving on its own .... that needs resolve and self confidence Indians are proud of what they achieve with their blood and toil .. !!

      @Vision2Win@Vision2Win Жыл бұрын
  • 6. As a viewer, I am captivated by the interesting and entertaining experience provided by this event. It's an opportunity for me to express my heartfelt thanks to all the charge inventors for their devoted and impressive work. Your dedication and hard work do not go unnoticed. Your efforts have created a captivating spectacle that brings joy, fun, and love to the audience. We recognize the long hours you put in, often without breaks, and the high-quality entertainment you provide. Your commitment to your craft is beyond words, and we appreciate your tireless efforts to bring us the very best.

    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai@Indian_Kumar_Poombai Жыл бұрын
  • Yes ,have it asap.

    @hmy20111@hmy20111 Жыл бұрын
  • A bomber? Are you serious? If it ain't REALLY stealth, nowadays, that thing gets shot down in 5 minutes, Ok Ok, 12 minutes then, from beyond the horizon.

    @chazzcannon3614@chazzcannon3614 Жыл бұрын
    • Go back to your room and sleep again.

      @wisdomchannelphilippines2760@wisdomchannelphilippines2760 Жыл бұрын
    • Go back to your room and sleep again.

      @Jessicaclar891@Jessicaclar891 Жыл бұрын
    • Bombers are stupid, but if you have them in numbers, you have a slight edge.

      @karthikdevanahalli@karthikdevanahalli Жыл бұрын
    • ​@@karthikdevanahallistop playing war thunder and read some wikipedia

      @JolaNat@JolaNat Жыл бұрын
    • This is where modern long range bombers like TU 160 and b1 are far different from a B52, long range strike capability, those bombers don't need to cross the radar to engage a target due to the cruise missiles and air to ground missiles, Compared to bombs, missiles are far more lethal but not cheaper

      @JolaNat@JolaNat Жыл бұрын
  • Are strategic bombers vulnerable? Strategic Bombers: Still Relevant? In this context, bombers are vulnerable to air defense missiles, interceptor aircraft, electronic warfare, and even electromagnetic pulse bursts; this raises questions about their capability to reach well-defended targets in the current age of high-performance air-defence systems.. These can be shot down much before a bomber reaches strategic location.

    @mannsinghs@mannsinghs Жыл бұрын
    • Bombers also act as missile carriers, which india needs since the Su-30 and Tajas can't carry more then one. Second, they can be launched from a safe distance before coming into the enemie's missile range, i.e it can safely launch the missile without entering enemy airspace

      @ChimeraISD@ChimeraISD Жыл бұрын
    • @@ChimeraISD That even Sukhois and Tejas can do, in a more effective way.... The only point can be amount of arsenal.

      @mannsinghs@mannsinghs Жыл бұрын
    • @@mannsinghs they can carry only one missile, bombers like the Tu-160 can carry multiple

      @ChimeraISD@ChimeraISD Жыл бұрын
  • Yes absolutely, every tools at it's disposal.

    @makahanp@makahanp Жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely... It goes without saying or any doubt that india should have bomber squadrons as well as missile force in its arsenal.

    @gauravgautam55@gauravgautam55 Жыл бұрын
  • Russian Tupolev 160 is a more potent Aircraft. And Vladimir Putin seems a Man without Duplicitous Attitudes, when it comes to Friends. Go for it.

    @priyanthapandukeabeynayake9407@priyanthapandukeabeynayake9407 Жыл бұрын
  • When people think of the Indian air force. The first thing that comes to their mind is Bipin falling out of a helicopter.

    @Indian_Kumar_Poombai@Indian_Kumar_Poombai Жыл бұрын
    • When people think of Chinese airforce.The first thing that comes to their mind is the KJ-200 landing on a hill side with a splendid splash.

      @sirpatriarch8122@sirpatriarch8122 Жыл бұрын
    • No it never came to our mind.

      @nightmist7977@nightmist7977 Жыл бұрын
    • When think of pak airforce one can only think of their worlds biggest srndr in 1971. They not only sutrndrd in large amounts but their air force army Navy and para military signed instrument of surrender of pak document and then surrender large territory to India.

      @Ms-a_1@Ms-a_1 Жыл бұрын
  • Definitely yes

    @ayankrdutta3671@ayankrdutta3671 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes! 👍

    @sonabarnes6670@sonabarnes6670 Жыл бұрын
  • Saying America can destroy Russia is like saying Ukraine a sovereign country 😂😂

    @willyblacofficial7292@willyblacofficial7292 Жыл бұрын
    • American can destroy Russia 100 times without them destroying a single US city, wakeup call needed badly

      @idiotburns@idiotburns Жыл бұрын
    • Very true!!

      @hewlettpackard1731@hewlettpackard1731 Жыл бұрын
    • So you're saying Russia can destroy America??🤣

      @omarionbayley9721@omarionbayley9721 Жыл бұрын
    • Russia is in self-destruct mode.

      @Hkchinese888@Hkchinese888 Жыл бұрын
    • For 0.1 percent of the US gdp, it’s doing a great job tearing down Russia. You noticed the sanctions are one sided and Russia can’t do a thing about it.

      @ett40146@ett40146 Жыл бұрын
  • Russian is the way 💪💪💪 🇮🇳🇷🇺

    @Dhrruvv@Dhrruvv Жыл бұрын
    • Modi no more friend with Putin no longer..

      @f-35lightningii6@f-35lightningii6 Жыл бұрын
    • Once Russia is defeated soon enough, we'll watch the Indians come crawling back. Also worth pointing out that once China attacks India, the west will stay neutral. Although we may still buy Chinese goods :~)

      @chris_anon88@chris_anon88 Жыл бұрын
    • Go with the weak Russians 🤣

      @UncleTonyshotsauce@UncleTonyshotsauce Жыл бұрын
  • You do understand that its a design from 1981 and not being build anymore for about 15 years, only 36 where ever build (yes for there time they was great aircraft but also become completly obsolete for this era)

    @Noodleanrgry@Noodleanrgry Жыл бұрын
  • Maintenance cost is very very high for this type of bomber and also it's cost is high.

    @anandtiwari9739@anandtiwari9739 Жыл бұрын
  • Russia makes beautiful aircraft. The White Swan is no exception.

    @truth959@truth959 Жыл бұрын
  • These huge bombers don't work against a country that has a decent Air Force and air defense system, like Pakistan. India should get stealth planes like the F-35 from the US. Love from an Afghan, Jai Hind 🇮🇳❤

    @dawood2u@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
    • Those Bombers can drop bombs over Indian Air Space while the trajectory and gravitational pull will ensure they drop on pakistani targets

      @dankseid3793@dankseid3793 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dankseid3793 SU-30MKI with Brahmos missiles will do an equally good job. Those huge bombers will be a waste of money. These huge bumpers only work if India achieves Air Supremacy over enemy airspace like US in Iraq in 1991.

      @dawood2u@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
    • @@dawood2u Brahmos missiles are incredibly expensive, the cost of 1 missile can get you several dozen bombs.

      @dankseid3793@dankseid3793 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dankseid3793 I agree with you on that. But then we are talking about smart bombs, probably laser or GPS guided, not dumb gravity bombs. Smart bombs are expensive too. If I was in charge, I would send 20 SU-30MKIs with Brahmos missiles and launch them at 50,000 feet from the LOC, Brahmos missiles can cover insane distances and they are super accurate. Tu-160 would only work in case of a war like Kargil, not if you want to hit targets in Islamabad or Lahore. Those places are highly defended.

      @dawood2u@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
    • @@dankseid3793 If you fire a Brahmos missile from an Su-30mki from Amritsar, it can easily hit Islamabad. So why bother buying expensive Tu-160s. I would invest that money on developing Superfast versions of Brahmas missiles, like Mach 8 speed Brahmos missile

      @dawood2u@dawood2u Жыл бұрын
  • I think India was already deal with Russia for "white swan" strategic bomber aircraft to counter Pakistan and mainly to "china" and as well as "to maintain India's dominance in the world".😎💪🇮🇳🤝🇷🇺✈️

    @raviraj56000@raviraj5600010 ай бұрын
  • Indeed 👍

    @subhashranjan3722@subhashranjan3722 Жыл бұрын
  • India should develop its nuclear potential to at least 800 nukes with the equivalent of 100 megatons of TNT. India should also develop more weapons that are non-nuclear in nature and are extremely lethal. for example-MOTHER OF ALL BOMBS AND FATHER OF ALL BOMBS. AS WELL AS MISSILES THAT CAN BE EQUIPPED WITH THIS STRENGTH TYPES OF WARHEADS.

    @MajesticOPs@MajesticOPs Жыл бұрын
  • Now that's Top Gun

    @jacksononesmo7694@jacksononesmo7694 Жыл бұрын
  • It’s crazy that Russia has also these advanced weapons but yet they haven’t even used them

    @Jocksman100@Jocksman100 Жыл бұрын
    • It's called Restraint

      @quilt704@quilt704 Жыл бұрын
    • Former sukhoi worker steal blueprint TU-160 escape to Mexico into Texas..

      @f-35lightningii6@f-35lightningii6 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, we must

    @DatsLens@DatsLens Жыл бұрын
  • You're wasting your money by buying military equipments from Russia, my advice is that you need to change and buy what we call quality but not quantity, and I believe that you know where to find the quality equipments. I love you India and God bless you 🙏

    @firstbornchannel1525@firstbornchannel1525 Жыл бұрын
  • Good commentary. The problem with procuring defence gear from abroad is always fraught with uncertainty. India must stop looking at Russia with the cold war era affection and adopt a more practical and.pragmatic approach towards that country. That doesn't mean cold shouldering Russia like the anglo saxons have been prodding us to do. Far from that, India should have the best of relations with Russia but stop short of pandering to each and every thing Russian. It needs to be noted that today's Russia also doesn't consider India a top priority in her foreign policy matters. Today's Russia is too closely aligned with China and too much interested in befriending Pakistan (possibly with Chinese nudging) much to India's indignation. Today's Russia is just playacting its strategic role with India and there simply isn't much either country can do about this state of affairs in our relationship. So, the TU Tupolev deal doesn't look like it is going to take off anytime soon. India must invest more on indigenisation of defence equipment and ordinance to the extent possible.

    @DevDutta_STANCE@DevDutta_STANCE Жыл бұрын
    • You should be a double agent. Let us betray both Russia and America, that way we’ll be right half the time.

      @ThePedroski007@ThePedroski007 Жыл бұрын
  • 2:20 f16 free package to Pakistan and lecture for india.

    @RajSingh-yd8ue@RajSingh-yd8ue Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, definitely

    @sivarajendras@sivarajendras8 ай бұрын
  • Yes no doubt not only bombers but also aircraft carrier of 1 lac + DWT. Jai Hind

    @krishnanswaminathan@krishnanswaminathan Жыл бұрын
  • Good luck buying Soviet antique. The American B-1B is capable of flying low to evade radar and surface to air missiles. Your Tu 160 will be shot down by Chinese air defense.

    @albertohusay3002@albertohusay3002 Жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂😂😂 lower flying without being detected 😂😂😂😂 the same they are claiming, until they got down in servia, by old Soviet S200 😂😂😂😂😂 US made weapons are more propagandist than efficient in real battlefield, they control media propagandist narratives, that is all .

      @sapienbrain8120@sapienbrain8120 Жыл бұрын
    • f-16 got shot down by north korea a few day ago.

      @S.Chand91@S.Chand91 Жыл бұрын
    • But the US defense products comes with a lot of conditions. these are meant to protect only american interests with Indian money. India would not have the freedom to use them the way India deems it fit.

      @herearewe@herearewe Жыл бұрын
    • @@Radio9730killer Antique collector. 😂

      @albertohusay3002@albertohusay3002 Жыл бұрын
    • @@sapienbrain8120 Duhh. The f-117 in serbia are not designed to fly low. It depends on its stealth. B-1B is not stealth but it can hide. Compare that to Tu 160 which is a big target in the sky. 😂🤣😂

      @albertohusay3002@albertohusay3002 Жыл бұрын
  • Namaskar Prends 🙏🙏 Karnataka Dalit man assaulted after he overtakes upper caste men on motorcycle; later ends life due to his humiliation. Please campaign for Dalit rights. 🙏🙏🙏🙏

    @Raghav_Modi@Raghav_Modi Жыл бұрын
    • Name a right(s) that the beloved Dalits doesn't have and i will fight for it/them.

      @sirpatriarch8122@sirpatriarch8122 Жыл бұрын
    • Sry, Karnataka does not do such things. Get a life. Stop spreading misinformation.

      @mmurthy9662@mmurthy9662 Жыл бұрын
  • yes

    @AnKiTeditSZonE@AnKiTeditSZonE Жыл бұрын
  • Good thought.... Initiative this plan...as soon

    @maheshmagi307@maheshmagi307 Жыл бұрын
  • yes this is a great thing to have , it will be a game changer

    @stevensreejith3041@stevensreejith3041 Жыл бұрын
  • Very Important

    @kirandeepchakraborty7921@kirandeepchakraborty7921 Жыл бұрын
  • INDIA shoud go for the Russian Tu160 Bomber. India has excellent relationship with Russis and US has has recently suppplied F16s to Pakistan and has yet to prove they are there with India in thick and thin despite the talks.

    @andreasadler5188@andreasadler5188 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes 💯

    @ulriccooke3859@ulriccooke3859 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes..

    @jobythomas1975@jobythomas1975 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes surely india must have such a squad.

    @bharatsingh8604@bharatsingh8604 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes definitely

    @sanjeevraina6492@sanjeevraina6492 Жыл бұрын
  • We need bombers like the tu 160 with long range missions and abilities of carrying cruise missils for we lack a bomber squadron after the retirement of Canberra.

    @RCLepcha@RCLepcha Жыл бұрын
  • Yes we want atleast 1😊🎉❤

    @leonfernandes131@leonfernandes131 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes, India should have it. Stability is must for India to grow economically and business will happen smoothly if India grows it military power.

    @amitkapoor6845@amitkapoor6845 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes

    @designworks1960@designworks1960 Жыл бұрын
  • India should have everything

    @_complicated__life@_complicated__life Жыл бұрын
  • Any proud country with a dream of being recognised as a global leader and a super power needs an arsenal that can project massive firepower even a long distance away. Proliferation and such technological restrictions laws are the last of apartheid kind of laws that are left. And the moment west understands this, India will become an unbreakable ally.

    @medhavi100@medhavi100 Жыл бұрын
    • But I am sure that they won't.

      @medhavi100@medhavi100 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes yes

    @lenrich3383@lenrich3383 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes.

    @getubeyene6681@getubeyene6681 Жыл бұрын
  • It is time for India to stretch out its muscles especially in the IOR and Indo-Pacific

    @hubert140990@hubert140990 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes ,sooner the better

    @t.rajanpillai8726@t.rajanpillai8726 Жыл бұрын
  • Definately !! We do have need for these bombers, with our jet squadrons ageing up. And not many fighters to strike deep lying enemy targets, these bombers would be of great importance, not only for entering enemy territory but also because of the amount of missiles it can carry alone in a single flight. We definately should have multiple squadrons of these kinda bombers, be it of any origin tbh 🤞🏽

    @subhamagarwal196@subhamagarwal196 Жыл бұрын
  • Maybe Tu-22M3M is a better choice for India with Brahmos 2 as main standoff weapon.

    @ronaldedilbertoona1146@ronaldedilbertoona1146 Жыл бұрын
  • India should need thiss

    @dineshbanny3700@dineshbanny3700 Жыл бұрын
  • Yes Bharat must have strategic Bomber

    @nitinjain1605@nitinjain1605 Жыл бұрын
KZhead