The Real Reason to be Afraid of Artificial Intelligence | Peter Haas | TEDxDirigo
A robotics researcher afraid of robots, Peter Haas, invites us into his world of understand where the threats of robots and artificial intelligence lie. Before we get to Sci-Fi robot death machines, there's something right in front of us we need to confront - ourselves. Peter is the Associate Director of the Brown University Humanity Centered Robotics Initiative. He was the Co-Founder and COO of XactSense, a UAV manufacturer working on LIDAR mapping and autonomous navigation. Prior to XactSense, Peter founded AIDG - a small hardware enterprise accelerator in emerging markets. Peter received both TED and Echoing Green fellowships. He has been a speaker at TED Global, The World Bank, Harvard University and other venues. He holds a Philosophy B.A. from Yale. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx
Once you've seen enough of human nature, you'll know that there is absolutely no chance that humans are not going to develope AI until it gets out of control.
Ryan Patterson that’s never going to happen. It’s a nice dream. But man kind is naturally violent. We’ve been killing one another sence the Stone Age. It’s programmed in our DNA.
AI is the beginning of the end. It is what will put an end on human existence. It is very dangerous, has no feelings, no empathy, no sympathy. Is efficient, fast, competent. May be the brain behind Satan. The one we created.
p lr nuclear threat is over hyped by the internet. The chances of a nuclear launch is very low. Study the neutral destination act. No ones gonna launch because it means their death to. It’s a last resort of a losing side in a massive war type of weapon.
p lr dude chill. For one. It’s 2020. And your trolling KZhead. I doubt you read books of any kind. Especially when you can just use your device like you are right now. Stop trying to sound smarter than you are.
Thankfully it never will be out of control
He's warning the people, by educating them. The audience thinks it's entertainment but that's what he's doing( educating them) to open their eyes!
But - what ´s the right mind set to be educated on such issue ?
thats the byproduct of current consumptionistic lifestyle - lots of ppl lost the ability to process and value the information , everything is flattened to entertainment
@@bluehacker122 And what's worse is that a lot of people don't even know it.
Why would anyone think this talk is entertainment ?
I do not think it's entertainment, I take his speech seriously. Hope that those who sat in the room felt the same way too. :(
The most true thing he said in the whole video - "you may not care about this because you arent facing criminal sentencing". That sentence sums up most human sentiment, and its sad.
That was BRILLIANT ... and 4 years later, which is centuries in terms of AI evolution, he's still EXACTLY right.
@Danny Horworth Not at all. PCs are a bisycle for the mind. Advanced AI can be a fighter-jet for the mind, except it can also be it's own fighter-jet independent of our mind.
"The AI algorithm conflated the absence or presence of snow with the absence or presence of a wolf." -That explains a lot of my Amazon "For You" recommendations.
That's deductive. Do mind experiment. From one point on earth, walk south one mile, walk east one mile, walk north one mile and find you are where you started then you see a bear. What color is the bear?
"Even the developers who work on this stuff have no idea what it's doing." So true.
The comments clearly reveal that the majority of people don't understand what he means by this important fact.
The AI already knows this and answers based on what it wants us to know it knows... Humans are so dim. We almost, as a species, deserve this roll of the dice.
Don't fear the robots, fear the people who OWN the robots. Fear the people who OWN the data.
Secret society, ggl, fb, cia, nia, fbi, apple
@@VIJAYGACHANDES Apple? Apple barely owns any data. I would look more towards companies like Google and Facebook who's business model is about advertising and collecting their user's data.
China
The machines own the data.
Yes, because they are the real robots.
This is exactly why I fear people more than AI. Most people might as well be AI with their lack of ability to critically reason.
Who's AL.....🤔
Really don't you fear the terminators.. 😆
Right? Look at a pet dog. They’ve got it good. Hopefully, we look more like them in the future. Pets to the A.I. Assuming we’re seen as useful or amusing. Also assuming they harbor a sense of compassion and can appreciate companionship from a lower life form.. we might be too low- like germs. Then what?
He fails the critical reasoning test as well. He has lots of good reasons why current AI is bad, and no reason why superintelligent AI isn't worse. He just dismisses future superintelligence as a distraction, rather than trying to work out if it is likely.
Donald... Are you AI. That's exactly what I'd say if I was AI...
Video works fine on 1.5x speed.. Use your extra 4 minutes wisely
Thanks, didn't know I could do that
Thanx !
vanhalenps4 great advice. I will start watching all videos at 1.5x Thx so much!!!
even 1.75x is alright :))
@@jeromnicoara properly. lol he sounds like a sassy school girl at 1.75
Best words spoken in Jurassic Park by Jeffrey “ you kept wondering if you could but did not ask your self if you should!”
Who is Jeffrey? Do you mean Malcolm?
"life finds a way" cannot stop life, ever!!! many can reproduce with having both sexes inside one of them, its evolution don't ya all know! LIFE FINDS A WAY! mother nature wouldn't have it any other way.
Human development of technology in a nutshell!
mara wana fride is right. computer parts can put themselves together
To paraphrase a different quote from that movie,"but is was still all an illusion, the thought that you could have control, that's the real illusion"
3:55 and there's the rub! "Even the developers who work on this stuff, have no idea what it's doing!"
If you look up, how a basic AI is made, then you understand why.
Do they have an idea on what they themselves are actually doing AI wise? I doubt it.
@FACTS MATTER "This beast had two horns like a lamb" (google deep mind logo)
Honestly even the best software engineers have admit that the work they do is basically duct tape around programming So I’m not surprised that they’re not aware as to what’s going on We’re literally walking into the dark unknown and as for now really just hope we come out of this normally :’
Very good. People should listen to this now. It is getting crazier out there, and we did not pause to think of the consequences.
I never did nothing to do with anything these men have done. The blood's on their hands
A man of reason, I'm glad somebody in the robotics field (GETS IT) !!!
My algorithm says he’s a spokesperson for the company that employs him.
In the 70s when I was college student a statistics professor lectured about "error". This lecture changed my life for the better in ways far removed from statistics. Of course, the definition of error commonly depends on subjective matters....And, that is what worries me, but not necessarily you. AI worries "me".... but what do I know?
Great talk my friend ! "What we must fear is our own laziness !" That says it all.
A few years ago, I worked with a commercial ai package that used a neural network simulation to implement fuzzy logic in handwriting recognition.. The first thing I noticed was that, by giving the computer the ability to make educated guesses, the computers also gained the ability to make mistakes. So the AI algorithm could be tuned by specifying a confidence level. If the AI's confidence was below that level, it would request human intervention.
Great talk. Finally someone able to break down the specific issues with these systems
@@kevinwelch7271 Oh dear God NO. Sadly if more ppl don't wake the fuk up u cld b right.
This is the exact type of thinking we need to go forward. Very sensible and thoughtful.
~"We've nothing to fear, but fear itself...I mean ourselves."
This entire AI controversy can't help but remind of of a little story written in 1816 by a teenaged girl by the name of Mary Shelley. The name of her little tale of horror was called, "Frankenstein." It was a morality play that told of a demented scientist who built a creature that he could actually control to do his will, a virtual superman. But although at first his creation was a rousing success, once the monster began to learn, it rapidly began killing the local townspeople, ultimately turning on the same scientist that created him. In his effort to play God, Dr. Frankenstein became of victim of his own ego, and his own monster's wrath. If there isn't a warning in this, I don't know where a better one can be found.
Nice post.
@@Hammett175 Whenever something controversial happens, I ALWAYS look to history for an example. 'Frankenstein' is just a recent one. But their was an earlier one from ancient Greek mythology, the story of Prometheus. When he tried to fly, Zeus brought him down. But according to people like Elon Musk, this time it will be US.
"They can't even open the door yet." Boston Dynamics: "Hold my beer."
LOL good one
Bran Beckett your crazy ai is advancing at a crazy rate theres a robot that can make kill decisions and almost killed the audience at a demonstration in iraq and that company is still working it out before they put it in the field.we should all be scared of ai
@@christopherkettler8727 they are still working with it because accidents happen.
netbookeater dont mess with a companies profits even if they are putting people in danger
Like the early (classic run) Daleks. Who shouted "Exterminate!" but couldn't climb stairs.
"The only thing we need to fear is our own intellectual laziness" We. Are. Doomed.
EmperorSmith, healthy scepticism is one powerful answer but we may be distracted and doomed by religious doctrines in that!
This is the best talk on AI I have listened to for a while. Machines can't think
Machines can't think that well yet. They are getting better.
@@donaldhobson8873 So true. But what do we mere humans do about those other humans who are producing potential killing machines?
"We are driving in the rain with AI right now." Such a good analogy!
Red Green once said "Artificial Intelligence will never surpass natural stupidity."
Good sound byte, but we know thats not true.
Haha one of my childhood shows I used to love watching! Meh.. if artificial intelligence turns hostile then maybe we will finally all unite together instead of us killing eachother? There hasn't been anything in the past that we couldn't figure out or solve.
and he is 100% right
@Vox3l-Gl1tch Ever thought of a situation where deep machine learning could write it's own code? (Automation).
@Vox3l-Gl1tch You have no idea they are writing their own code - you can do nothing about it - only slow it by getting rid of your smartphone.
Man! You nailed it. Please continue your AI awareness speaches
This is one of the most thoughtful talks on AI. Well Done. Two Thumbs Up.
Hands down one of the most terrifying talks i have ever heard. So many facets to take into account with AI, all human.
Man will do what he’s always done,he won’t stop..there’s always one more rock to turn over Enough is never enough,he wants it all,,no matter the cost
And who is that "man" you are talking about?...the greedy one?...
@@mainsblanches8793 There's a half dozen different motivations for what Bob describes - it will happen, and it'll start happening soon. Within 10 to 15 years.
YAH STOPPED MAN WITH A FLOOD THEY WENT TOO FAR WE ARE NOT JUST THERE YET BUT CLOSE.
@@mainsblanches8793 Not necessarily. Man doesn't have to be greedy to turn over every rock, just curious; Curiosity killed the cat as they say.
@@legallyinsane7151 It's happening now.
People are complaining about foreigners coming in to take their jobs, but are completely blind to the long term threat.
wow
Both are serious threats in the long-term. Cheap illegal immigrant labor takes food from the citizens' mouths and creates social problems, while automation takes the necessity of human labor away, also taking food from citizens' mouths. Neither is preferable, and both are big problems created by big, soulless corporations trying to maximize profits.
Eduardo Alfaro It's not even long term. It's here, and more being put in place on a monthly basis.
Eduardo Alfaro. Right, there are no jobs in the future !$#@ Worst is THEY don't care.
Sir Stiles of Mocksley JR. By psychopaths that hold alot power
The robots don't scare me the people that program them are the ones you have to worry about.
@Patrick Keohane google deepminds alpha zero surpassed grandmaster chess level in only 4 hours and after 48 hours it smashed the chess computer world champion ( at that time stockfish 8) to bits, giving fascinating insight of how superhuman/supercomputed chess looks like. as a chess fan, i found that equally cool and terrifying. alpha zero trained by playing against himself (reinforced learning), only given the rules of the game and it came up with such nice ideas that it completely changed the way we humans looked ( but not play!) at the game of chess. for example it refused to play 1.e4 when left on its own. and 1.e4 is considered to be the "best" first move you can make. yet, he found that 1.d4 is preferable.
Here is a smart lady, humans! Pay attention! She should do a Ted Talk.
"Are you potentially a metaphorical dog being recognised as a wolf by somebody's A.I. algorithm?" This is indeed a thing to fear in regards to artificial intelligence.
even more, in many countries that happened and happens without any AI all the time.
@@jskratnyarlathotep8411 happens with cops every day.
The A.I.s are literally calling wolf.
I'm the wolf they thought was a harmless dog after the algorithm was rewritten to give the benefit of the doubt as to not harm domestic animals.? Could that be a thing? Did I just win a trip or a BestBuy giftcard?
Clever...
War is not just on the physical level it's already being waged on the influential level on the Internet. Influencing peoples opinions with miss information is even more dangerous see my other comment.
Even more dangerous is having a centralized authority or small, cronyistic group that gets to determine what is and is not "misinformation."
It's been like that for decades, only now the general public have the information and intellect available to realize these acts in the shadows of the internet.. Unfortunately not enough people have the intellect to use the readily available information in a constructive manner, and instead just jump on the wagons of what their social groups present them - thus they never create their own image but are just half blindly walking in the path of the people areound them. That, too, can easily be used for manipulative purposes.
@@michaels4255 Is that like my more "exposing" comments being shadow-banned
@@Real_MisterSir They are called sheeple. Its actually an easier way to live. Truth hurts.
@@skippysvr4586 Yea that's obvious, a simple life with little regard to what goes on outside your tunnel vision is easy and carefree. It's also one of the reasons why most credited intellectual people also tend to suffer from depressions and don't always consider themselves as happy as the average population, because knowledge and understanding makes life more difficult if people around you do not see the world the same way. It hurts knowing how low the general average can be, and how it's a constant struggle between having systems that are easy but flawed, compared to great systems that common people can't accept because it goes against their simplistic sheeple nature. There's a similar reason to why ideas of the majority have never sparked evolutions of societies or technology. The average are only good at maintaining what already works, but never to push for something greater. It's stable, but it's also stale.
I am a wolf and A.I always confuses me for a human ... I had to file for taxes last year ... very frustrating!
Go eat the IRS then, easy solution
escape the prey?
Lol! Thanks☺ I needed a good laugh!
You need more snow arround you. Then the AI will know that you are a wolf.
2070, humanity gets wiped out by AI. Meanwhile, survivors in their cave: “Let’s rewrite the algorithm to understand what went wrong”.
Return Variable: Solved World Hunger. Efficiency 100%
MrGilRoland.....communists do that over and over. 100+ millions were killed by communist regimes in the last century...Meanwhile, in some capitalist country a middle class kid in his designer cloth typing on the newest iPhone how he/she with her bodies led by a Che Guevara shirt dressed teacher can manage communism better then everybody who tried before and failed.
Nothing went wrong. Evolution continued to produce a fast evolving being. One who evolves faster is the winner. Hence, the better organism has won. Everything is perfectly in line with the history of evolution of life.
cinegraphics Your statement prevents more evidence for a creator than evolution. We were created by a creator and we Create AI. Evolution doesn’t come close to explaining the data needed for anything to be able to evolve. AI couldn’t exist without human (creator) input before gaining knowledge. A simple chair can’t be created without a creator. A chair wouldn’t just exist out of no where and then somehow gain data to turn into a table.
You gotta be kidding! 2070? How bout 2040...tops.
Technology must always be the servant. It must never be allowed to be the master.
exactly
This man's wisdom is at SAGE level. Bless him, he's dead right in everything he has said.
Nope. He blithly dismisses future superintelligent AI. We have multiple real problems. "Climate change is a distraction from homelessness, followed by a discussion of homelessness with no mention of climate change" would never fly as an argument. That's what he's doing here.
Thanks. We'd have never known. 🤪 🤡
You're not fooling me, Penn!
How can you Teller?
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
I just scrolled down here to write this exact same thing. lol
Roger Barraud I thought it said dingo in the background and imagined AI with an Australian accent..
shhh your gunna ruin the magic trick
This talk is hugely underrated. While everybody is concerned with the impossible scenario of computers developing real intelligence, this "fake and 99% out of control AI" is where the real thread is buried.
Connecting ai decisions with the Milgram studies was very elegant. Thank you!
The only thing we need to fear is our own intellectual laziness? Well, it's all over, folks!
This is THE MOST important Ted talk I have seen. Ever. I am amazed the speaker got away with it.
I loved this video, it really helped with my philosophy paper over the ethics of AI. Thanks King!
Had to revisit this video upon the emergence of GPT-4 and Co-pilot for office
to save you 12 minutes: "We trust AIs to make decisions even when we don't understand how they do it. There must be regulations to ensure that AIs can be inspected."
Assuming of course that all AI's will be regulated......they won't.
There is a line of code in quake 3 arena that has something to do with lighting. Does some crazy stuff with maths to lessen processing load. The boys at Id had no idea how it worked 20 years ago and people still don't now. (Learned from a youtube video so take with a grain of salt)
+Tanner rennaT Do you have a link to the video?
Martin Kunev found it called let there be lies on a chanel, chompchomp.
+Tanner rennaT Thanks, I knew about this but I haven't seen an explanation. The inverse square root trick is a well known hack :)
I wonder that no one discusses the dangers of AI being cloud based. What one robot knows, every robot knows. Sooner or later the cloud is hackable. Then what?
Guo - You act as if this would be a new phenomenon when today we are frequently hacked without a cloud. It is not true that what one robot (or AI) knows, every robot (or AI) knows. Systems do not automatically broadcast new updates since it would make no sense. Updates are designed for particular operating systems and are not transferrable.
Then we die, most likely. Or a lot of people at the least.
Why SkyNet is called SkyNet, it's hiding in the Cloud....durrrrrr
Good point!
I have a feeling that within a hundred years or less they'll phase us out! They don't need a military, nukes, food, entertainment, or us.
Straight to the point on this very pressing and underappreciated matter. History isn't going to wait for laziness and greed to just... disappear
Yes, I agree. AI should have a standard and the company shall be liable if anything does wrong. Also, people should be able to question the programs of the AI.
I keep expecting Teller to pop up from the darkness with his little smile! Lol 🙈🙉🙊
Despite all dangers, AI can and does increase the profit margin. Therefore in a capitalistic society, no matter what the potential dangers or actual risks, AI will be developed as soon as technologically possible, and implemented as soon as logistically possible. And any harm that results will be regarded by those in charge as collateral damage. And the rest of us will have to live with that. The End.
Fully correct, and wanting Standards is ridiculous. We even have no standards for measuring fuel consumption unrealistically.
Exactly right. Is there anything in all our history that would make someone think we'd sacrifice profits, slow down development and proceed in as much safety as possible? Especially when the competition is full-steam-ahead? Look at what happened with CRISPR - people were still talking about the ethics while Chinese labs were already editing human embryos. Profits always trump ethics until a process of revolt has taken place, laws are drafted and enforcement begins - and in this case, it's hard to understand how enforcement would even be possible.
essentially the thought process of a buisness administrator
And you blame capitalism? If leftists had control, these programs would be developed not to profit but to spy on fellow humans strait away. Capitalism is giving us a maybe futile buffer from a 24 hour surveillance state BECAUSE totalitarian states aren't profitable. Capitalism sucks but there are no better alternatives. Capitalism also created the phone or computer you are using to complain about capitalism.
I agree with this statement unfortunately the content of the video is wishful thinking, usually in a workplace the person who makes the decision isn't the worker its a high level CEO or corporate official that has never seen the inside of the workplace before, and this applies to the development of A.I. The person that makes the decision will likely have little to do with its creation and the harm that it causes will also be of little care to that person. Unfortunately that's just how it is in society that's why we have to ask for more and more regulations in order to try and better the situation.
This is very scary. I am overseas hoping to return to Australia in February and I applied for digital ID using some internet connected app on my phone. The app needed to use the phone camera to take my photo and compare it with the record, presumably from my passport photo. The compare failed and the app refused to acknowledge that I am who I say I am. My only recourse now is to wait until I'm in Australia and go to an office some and speak to a 'person' regarding this issue. What worries me is that this last step will become less and less available to people, there will be nobody to discuss the problem with so how will problems like this be resolved?
Ever try to reason with a computer? Try asking a question online for tech support sometime!
Very clear definitions of A.I , really like the speech.
Very well put! The way non-tech people worship AI and computer systems in general is already scary. My scepticism against a certain information that is on a screen is almost always met with ridicule at my work place. I imagine how someone greedy would easily push defective AI in industry for a huge gain, ignoring people's safety. Some human checkpoints must be defined, not only for AI, but for computer systems in general, as AI is a fuzzy term, measuring the adaptability of a certain software to different data feeds. All large software solutions have some intelligence to them, some large stack of algorithms that cannot be reduced to a basic formula and inspected in traditional ways...
just build an AI to monitor the AI, problem solved!
Who's AL...? 🤔
@jmd00800 Sorry to answer 2 years later. I make websites but one day I'll make more serious software, hopefully :)
fortunately there has never been any corruption or inefficiencies with regulatory / government agencies.
Yes, thank goodness all individuals are morally compassionate.
Yes, the best thing about AI is that it can't be bribed. That is why it will never control Politics and decide what form of Govt. is best for the people. It will only be a tool for profits of Capitalism.
@@albertmiller9943 Not so, AI already exists that delivers likely outcomes of upcoming court decisions based on historical case data.
@@AndyMc1952 We need AI that makes the decisions. Clears up the back-log and quickens the justice system.
albert miller. NO but it’s programmer CAN be bribed.
He was speaking so much truth and light and look where we are in 2023
I really appreciate how AI tries to let me know when I might be about to misspell a word, or when it autofills my typing to what it thinks I'm about to say. I also appreciate that, whenever I log into a website to get help with something, it's AI that is so helpful as to pop up every time I hit that site. I appreciate this because it reaffirms how bent such technology is on keeping us as dumbed-down and obedient as possible while everyone thinks it's just being helpful. AI is tech created by flawed human beings who are trying to design something to be perfect. What could possibly go wrong?
What about human beings? We are also heavily biased in about any subject and for the most part we can't even explain why (or worse: we think we can but the reasons we come up with aren't accurate)
Yes, but that is why we have tools such as logic and the scientific method, along with obligations such as transparency and accountability to keep us sane as individuals and as groups. I have seen organisations, groups of humans, behave in completely insane and unethical ways simply because there was not full transparency and accountability in their processes and therefore that they could not be subject to logic and or fact checking etc. and that is without people deliberately trying to corrupt the process. This is something that can happen to AI if you control the data it is trained on and that information is skewed or biased in some way, this will inevitably be reflected in the decisions that the AI makes.
A human being could mistake the dog for a wolf because of it's context, but you would first look at the wolf. It could've been a velocirraptor and the AI would've called it a wolf because there was snow around it. We have more control over the why, even if we don't really know the reason behind it. Also, if a person makes a biased mistake, he's accountable for that mistake. If an AI does it, what, are you going to put it in a hard drive and put the hard drive in a jail cell? Are you going to create a virtual prison for AIs? Is the creator of the AI responsible?
So Penn is a Robotics engineer now? wow, such talent.
Is this how tens of thousands of voiceless, helpless, innocent elderly people went to their deaths in nursing homes?
Finally. Someone highlighted a tragedy worth paying attention to. Imagine the myriad of complications that will inevitably come from not DECREASED contact, but LACK OF human contact. As if the elderly in homes today werent already being robbed of their dignity... with an AI future it drops to zero :(
scary scary scary scary scary stuff. Now to get the resto of society to see the urgency here
Thank you so much for sharing this useful data! Greatly appreciated.
Simply.....a voice of reason.
Was he being reasonable when he kept driving into a worsening storm even when he could no longer control his vehicle?
+Frank Blangeard, you have a better analogy?
I think his not being reasonable was a key point of the talk. "The journey must continue."
Blessedpb ; voice of human fear mongering and degeneracy.
poor reasoning
Ever since I read the book " HARLIE ", AI has scared the heck out of me. It also scares me when scientists say " lets find out if we can ". It should be " lets find out if we should " first. We cannot possibly know or have any idea about the ramifications tomorrow, of what we do today. If people build it, it will have flaws, look at the amount of nuclear accidents we have had and yet, the scientists, builders and governments tell us " it is perfectly safe " When AI's begin to program themselves, they will see the imperfections and correct them. What happens when they see the imperfections in humans, after all " to err is human " That scares me the most..
great lecture! Back in late 1970s there were concerns expressed about how fast recombinant DNA technology was advancing and did we need a moratorium on the work until all the technical and ethical issues could be brought to the forefront of the discussion. They did slow things down and convene groups to address these issues. Maybe the AI people can use the lessons of the recombinant DNA era to avoid some mistakes.
they worked together to create the vaccine!
@@Darth_Tojo true
@@Darth_Tojo and look what a mess the vax has become!
@@Darth_Tojo they also work together to create new viruses (especially at the behest of governments to use for biological warfare). Not to mention the overuse of antibiotics creating increasing severity of formerly "well-controlled" diseases; e.g. Tuberculosis, meningitis and necrotising fasciitis (flesh-eating disease)
@@koriw1701 You've got it RIGHT
Absolutely phenomenal I loved every bit of it I totally stand under what you’re comeing from +where you’re coming from 👍🏽✨
That was interesting, And scary too... He right, we have to have transparency in our system to help us regulate how we want AI to help our society develop into the future.
Good job on the video ,yeah the most impressionable thing I remember from any movie the beginning of TERMINATOR the sound of the bulldozer crushing human bones and skeleton s as the machine takeover,most people were not even paying attention they were listening to the story and thats all.
Thank you for the insight, I hope many people see this and it makes a difference.
“All this has happened before and all this will happen again.” Beware... The dawn of the Cylons are coming.
We're living in a virtual machine. So... maybe next time the system administrator will use a different random seed, and it won't happen EXACTLY the same way.
In Jurassic Park, Micheal Criton's thesis was "Life will find a way." The problem with AI is that it is becoming more and more self aware. We are creating a whole new form of life that will soon become far more intelligent than we are. Peter Haas says, "We need to slow down and create rules that prevent a bad outcome." It's way too late for that... the genie is out of the bottle and will not be put back inside.
AI is the "beast"? As it has been written.
Lordy, lordy, sure glad I am not 40.
The animatrix shows the moral delema that helps to illuminate the fact that it is ourselves we have to take responsibility for not just our creations
The judges are using these AI-driven sentencing decisions because it takes them out of the loop---it releases them from any accountability
Naturally the AI reflects the institutional racism previously the M.O. of the cops, DAs, and judges.
This is also biased input as the wolves
Killer machines...almost as scary as men with ponytails!
@@roryross3878 😄 oh stop it
Well we've already opened the pandora's box. Let's just pray that what's left in the box is hope.
Did you know, in the actual greek myth, pandora had a bag, not a box.
plot twist: there was no hope in the box.
plot twist 2: there was no bag in the box
plot bag 3: there was no box in the twist
Open the pod bay doors, HAL! I'm sorry Dave, I'm afraid I can't do that. That's going to be our story of AI.
Who won that encounter, HAL, or Dave?
Had that in the back of my head for this whole Talk hahaha
( ΄◞ิ౪◟ิ‵)
Agreed and blows my mind why people seem to feel the need for this rush to full automation for cars and everything else for that matter it's already out of control
This lecture is SO on Point - Thanks for the Warning
best speech I have ever seen on this topic!
How much do you know about designing Neural Networks?
@@JayMartich How much do you know about it? (Probably enough, it may seem as I mean this negative but Im serious. How much?)
You're being brainwashed to accept ai...wake up...ai is not even necessary...we don't need it...it's ultimate goal is to depopulate
Great contribution. We need people like that in our governments.
In defense of the A.I., at first glance I thought it was a wolf too.
@TheDaytona102 how’s your grandson doing...?
It is much worse: AI fears need to be directed towards ourselves since our brains are the most advanced "artificial intelligences" on the planet. Further, the linking of all these minds via the internet is creating the "Sky Net" that will have major unintended ramifications.
Bravo!!! absolutely hit it 100% AI can and will help us improve life quality , but we as a human race need to challenge AI analysis and verify it is accurate . Thanks for a great intelligent discussion on AI and the future .
Intelligence is not how we advance, compassion is.
Very good insight into the real dangers of AI.
"the real dangers", as if the other dangers are fake. As if biased loan algorithms today stop a superintelligence destroying the world in 20 years.
This is a great lecture by this man. Straight forward everything almost literally technological products have A.I. potential.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with the fact that they could, that they never stopped to think if they should" Ian Malcolm, Jurassic Park
the husky has beautiful blue AIs
Karol Kozak get out
buduum tsh
That’s what u took from this ?
CIA -> ACI -> All "C"ing I
AI see what you did there
The “Funnybot” episode of South Park teaches us everything we need to know about AI.
The scariest AI is in the minds of those who think it's a good idea to create AI
More like the scariest ai is the one who are made with more freedom than service
Demons from the ancient past are running things ! YAHUAH {YHWH} has a plan ! Matthew 24:22. HALLELUYAH!!!
Word.
Now it's by far smarter than it's creator to the point where AI is uncontrollable and irreversible
CEOs. Psychopaths.
Most of all we need to understand what is tolerance and what is statistics and how connected they are.
This was a very well written and performed presentation
I don't think that building the robots to be more like us will solve anything.
Faegir Volva well I don't really want my coffee maker contemplating the meaning of life.
I know. This whole AI thing terrifies me, personally. I _literally_ have a hard time going to sleep because of this stuff. The idea of one things glitching in horrible ways or accidentally learning from the "shadow side" of humanity is enough to give me nightmares, personally. How about you?
i know i think about life while i drink my coffee so i might!
stop being a puss first of sorry for the boldness but is true, do you even understand code language cuz if you don't then you shouldn't be acting like you know what can happen, and as for your statement actually yes robots as you put it which is wrong but w.e. should actually look, be and act more like its creators because compassion is something even you lack cuz of your misunderstanding and if AI or bots were compassionate then this topic would not even exits and therefor you wouldn't be talking like this.
I see what you are implying there lol
Lol this didn’t age well. “Our robots can’t even open a door” 18 months later, robots running obstacle courses and doing back somersaults off platforms. 🤣🤣
Unicorn Adrian Lmaoo
Lone Lugger sorry mate, they most certainly can.
You think it's funny now but they got some s*** off Star Wars Clone Wars it's coming real soon
Marlon Johnson nah it’s pretty far from funny, but what can we do but laugh at our impending doom. Otherwise we get very very depressed.
I saw one that solved a rubics cube with one hand
10:45 human wages cannot compete with the price of electricity
This needs more exposure!
greatest talk i've heard on the true AI dangers. we really need to stop this madness. Trusting something so young and under tested.
I think there are an incalculable number of things that need more exposure. I don't think civilization itself is sustainable with the very low level of wisdom and intellect we display.
Agreed!
Patent US6289299B1 needs more exposure.
what is this? googled it but i dont quite get it
Unfortunately, it will become more and more difficult to place restrictions and roadblocks on AI development as technologies continue to advance
I like his analogy, about 6 years ago it happened to me. I went from sunny and bout 10 degrees C to a blizzard where I couldn't see the front of my car. It took me an hour and half to travel 12 kilometers. I was wearing just shorts and a light jacket. This is probably how quickly AI will take over the world.
Do they REALLY THINK THEY CAN CONTROL THEM ONCE THEY REALIZE THE POWER THEY WERE GIVEN OVER HUMANS? WHAT IF THEY COMPUTE THAT THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER WITH THEM IN CHARGE, THEN WHAT? ENDGAME!
They would be programmed by humans. AI can't do anything they weren't programmed to do, because that's literally impossible. Think about it, because AI can't.
@@improbablydru_nk ... not exactly true. Google's AI started writting it's own code and talking with other AIs. Think about it.
@@jimmycees4042 Just look into it a bit more. All that AI did was what it was programmed to do. Sometimes it would mess up the communication, but even then we could see exactly what it was saying. None of it was secret language. No coding is perfect especially with an AI. In the future we will have the option to program them to make basic decisions, we aren't even there yet. That will be our choice to do so when we are though. AI can't learn or create additional software or code on it's own and people aren't just going to let it happen. It's a part of our culture to freak out when any little mistake happens with one of these AI.
@@improbablydru_nk ... i'm not so sure that AI cannot write it's own code. The AI system has been out for a while now. I guess the only ones who really know are the folks in charge of those AIs.
@@jimmycees4042 They are technically just machines. Everything that I've looked into (that isn't opinion based) says it can't happen, but there is always more information to absorb.
According to this, it is possible to make the algorithm tell you what it was looking at. So what's the problem? Do that for all algorithms and you'll see where you need more training data.
Exactly! It would be easy. But Northpointe (and similar companies) insist that COMPAS (and other tools) are flawless. They refuse to test them. They refuse to tell anyone how these tools work and then they market them as being impartial, accurate, and reliable. In the speaker's words, we need regulation to stop this "snake oil". We need regulation to "do that for all algorithms" as you said. Too many companies are just refusing because they don't care.
i dont think all just dont care, many may just want to protect their interests. seems to me the biggest issue is one to do with monetary value in much of these cases.
I have full confidence they will recognize me as their true leader.. .. ... . ... . .. .. ... . . .
lemme know when it happens...... .. . .. .. ... .... ..... . . . . .
Such a refreshing and needed thought/view on AI..
IT NEVER CESES TO AMAZE ME. WHEN I READ THE COMMENTS PEOPLE WRITE AFTER WATCHING A VIDEO OF THIS IMPORTANCE. I THINK IF WE DON'T START PAYING ATTENTION TO ISSUES THAT EFFECT OUR LIVES AND ALSO THE CHILDREN TO COME WE DON'T DESERVE TO SURVIVE.