You do great videos but don't cut away from the play so quickly. Show enough so we see what the call is.
@fredworth8613 Жыл бұрын
Thanks bro
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max.
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
@@hospedajepr I think your making nonsense up.
@samobaraa Жыл бұрын
@@samobaraa Sorry, I’m just an attorney. Still learning, have a nice day 😉
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
@Hospe Daje but the clips are longer then 5 seconds?
@JeffUr7 Жыл бұрын
This isnt a good video. You need to show what the rulings end up being for any of this to have any meaning whatsoever.
@michaelmahoney567711 ай бұрын
This is interesting to watch all these strange plays - but it would be nice to know what the final ruling is on some of these. Mostly, we never know.
@DavidEmerling79 Жыл бұрын
yeah... i gave up 3 mins in... It was most unsatisfying
@josephj.prioli1823 Жыл бұрын
Agree. This is too choppy and jumps from one to the next too quickly.
@brianarbenz1329 Жыл бұрын
@@brianarbenz13290
@lmlopez368211 ай бұрын
Totally agree, also can't assume every watcher knows what rules are being broken (eg what was Illegal about the pitch that hit the umpire). Title of video is Illegal moments, so I am assuming there is something not allowed in the play. To my understanding of baseball (which isn't much, I'm Australian and don't follow MLB) there is nothing wrong with the play, just the umpire being unlucky.
@neilhulands24268 ай бұрын
I love to see good umps not giving players a Hit-Batter call and even better calling Strikes on pitches when batters lean into them.
@Maxbps88 Жыл бұрын
I wonder if anyone has been hit by a pitch twice in one at bat after not being awarded first base the first time.
@lo1bo2 Жыл бұрын
Don’t cut the clip so short. You’re leaving out the explanations of what happened.
@HealthyHearts Жыл бұрын
Sorry bro Thanks for watching
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Yeah, I didn't finish watching.
@stevegabbert9626 Жыл бұрын
@@stevegabbert9626 Yeah between the title and how badly cut this is its unwatchable
@Fly-The-W10 ай бұрын
Yeah, sadly this made an otherwise cool video unwatchable.
@ross-carlson8 ай бұрын
I always love Scott Servais's look of irritation. It's one of the great things in baseball.
@judyjohnson630 Жыл бұрын
Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell
@Fit4C11 ай бұрын
MLB interference calls are confusing. The runner has to allow defense to attempt a play, and defense can't get in the way of the runner. How does that work?
@sethranney Жыл бұрын
For each play where there can be a play made on the ball, the closest umpire decides which defensive player is most likely, in their opinion, to make the play (99% of the time, this is an obvious choice). That player has right of way to fielding the ball, and even if their attempt to field the batted ball gets in the way of the runner, as long as they are in the act of fielding, the runner must avoid them. Any other fielder that gets in the way of the runner is committing obstruction, and once that fielder is no longer in the process of fielding the batted ball, and does not possess the ball, they must also clear out of the way of the runner or they will be committing obstruction.
@OngakuSensei86 Жыл бұрын
@@OngakuSensei86Even possessing the ball doesn't necessarily protect them from being called for obstruction. It's less likely since they'll likely be making a play on the runner, but still possible.
@ericwildfong3 ай бұрын
When players go out of their way in getting an obstruction/interference call, they should call the player out or the runner allowed to take the base. Ynoa was maybe a foot or two in the field of play maybe just off the base path and the player just reaches out and touches him and they call Ynoa for obstructing the runner.
@screwthisin3 ай бұрын
The standard is "hinders or impeeds" for obstruction and I believe also interference. Sounds like a case of type 2 or type B obstruction which isn't an automatic base award like type 1 or type A. Type 2 is protection to the base which in the umpires judgement would of been safely reached without the obstruction and the ball remains live. Advancing beyond this base can be done at the runners own peril (essentially "nullify the act" and only enforced if needed). Additionally per the rule book the base path only officially exists when there's a play being made on a runner, in all other cases they are essentially free to run where they want and technically it's up to the defence to avoid them.
@ericwildfong3 ай бұрын
That very first one was NOT....ABSOLUTELY NOT....a balk. That was a violation of the "detached equipment" rule. You can't use equipment (i.e., a face mask), detached from it's normal wear on your body to make a play on a live ball.
@viking956 Жыл бұрын
I'm not up on umpire mechanics, but apparently it's signed as a balk and charged to the pitcher as a balk, and the runners, if any, advance.
@skydiverclassc2031 Жыл бұрын
@@skydiverclassc2031 Actually the correct signal for a balk is a "delayed dead ball" whereas the signal for detached equipment is "dead ball". Most umpires don't know the difference.
@viking956 Жыл бұрын
@@skydiverclassc2031 The point to the ground/catcher by the umpire is not the balk mechanic. You also don't kill play immediately for a balk, you need to let it play out. I believe if a runner successfully steals a base on a balk they don't get another base (but I could be wrong). The penalty for most defensive violations is runners advancing (since that's the only real negative the defence have), while for the offence it's a strike or an out. Sometimes you see balls awarded because of a violation by the defence (going to the mouth, and pitch clock rules come to mind) but much less common that base awards.
@ericwildfong3 ай бұрын
There was a couple plays where the incident happens off camera. Too many smash cuts and several it doesn't even say what the ruling was.
@villaxy11 ай бұрын
These are being cut off way too fast! Can't tell what actually happened 🤷🏾♂️
@Gamer65Actual6 ай бұрын
Please keep it going till we know what happened with rulings, awarded bases, etc.
@WDOB-gt7sv6 ай бұрын
Announcers need to know the difference between interference (offense) and obstruction (defense).
@scolley061611 ай бұрын
While you're technically correct, interference is not specific to offensive players. It also extends to catchers, umpires, any player that isn't in the game, and fans.
@Floydisgr811 ай бұрын
Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell
@Fit4C11 ай бұрын
Yes, except that interference is on the defensive and obstruction is on the offense. I use catchers interference to help remember.
@chavamitzen189411 ай бұрын
@@chavamitzen1894 Catchers interference is the "oddity" where it's the catcher that gets in the way of the batter swinging the bat. Interference is typically committed by the offence involving hindering or impeding the defence, while obstruction involves the defence hindering or impeding the offence. Spectator and umpire interference are similar in that they involve a spectator or umpire hindering or impeding the defence. Both interference (all types) and obstruction while some have prescribed penalties generally follow the mantra of "Nullify the act" or in other words, position runners based on what in the umpires judgement would of happened had there been no interference, in some cases that means letting the result stand. Say a runner trips over a fielder who isn't fielding the ball (Type 2 Obstruction), but they still make it in safely. You don't enforce additional penalties because the trip didn't result in an unfair advantage for the defence (didn't hinder or impede the runner enough to change the result). Alternatively, suppose the same runner trips rounding second, but then gets out halfway to home. Again it's Type 2 Obstruction so if the umps determine he wouldn't of scored anyway he's still out. Its only really in the close plays where type 2 obstruction really comes into play. You can even hear the umpire in one of the clips calling obstruction as "Thats interference" so even pro umps can't keep the two straight sometimes.
@ericwildfong3 ай бұрын
Let each clip run a lil longer so we can see what the exact rulings are. Good video
@user-zt2vc5ph2z11 ай бұрын
Agree with most comments..these clips are interesting BUT they cut off way TOO SOON.
@ginathacker62072 ай бұрын
I used to be fast enough that I could reverse direction during a run down just as they threw the ball and run into them, always got the base.
@blauer2551 Жыл бұрын
Nice tactic
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
@@TopAllSports our coach taught us to stay out of the base line so that couldn’t happen and you weren’t throwing over the runner either.
@blauer2551 Жыл бұрын
An explanation of what happened & why would be better.
@Jmatt45511 ай бұрын
Not sure what is so 'illegal' about most or even all of these plays. More than anything, they're just bloopers.
@kyle3810002 ай бұрын
Many of these cuts are too quick. We can't necessarily tell what was called in each case. 1:17, for instance. Last thing we hear is "out at first", but there appears to have been obstruction on the catcher when the runner ran into his back as the pitcher went after the ball. Was that called?
@eauhomme Жыл бұрын
That game 3 of the Cards and Red Sox series was my favorite
@carlbinkley4723 Жыл бұрын
Elvis Andrus shows up quite a few times here
@letmebemad3 күн бұрын
Tough way to lose or end a game. Got a new subscriber. Was fun to watch. Great video
@storytimewithunclebill1998 Жыл бұрын
maybe let some clips play out? some of them I have no idea of the outcome...otherwise thank you!!
@PeterOkeefe54 Жыл бұрын
I was at that Oakland vs Boston game at Fenway. That was game 3 of the 2003 ALDS. A's won the first two game of the 5 game series and gave away two runs in game 3 then lost games 4 and 5. Was the series that set up the 2003 ALCS where Grady Little did not take Pedro out of the game and he lost the lead. Yankees when on to win in game 7 with a Boone homerun but the Marlins won the World Series.
@StanSwan3 ай бұрын
You have excellent videos, did your editor just had an off day? I still am a fan of your videos. Just seemed the editing was a little sloppy. But thank you for the entertainment
@thiswasabadidea85923 ай бұрын
Would be good to see some info on the why's and how's of why these plays were illegal. Some are obvious but others need some explanation and slo-mo ect. Otherwise it was an interesting video. FYI I'm an Australian with an interest in mlb so a lot of the finicky rules I'm ignorant of.
@Rodent197011 ай бұрын
@@LiamG4 Thankyou for that. Some of the throws looked deliberately thrown into the runner but the runner was penalized. Doesn't seem fair.
@Rodent197011 ай бұрын
@@Rodent1970If you're talking about the Runners Lane interference ones (throws to first from the home plate area), the runner isn't protected running outside the runners lane in the last 45ft to first (supposed to be in foul territory up the first base line). He can leave the lane in the last step or two to reach the base, but if he never entered he can't leave. The throws might be deliberate but the runner also isn't where he's supposed to be and he's "in the way" so by rule you have RLI (Runners Lane Interference). Baseball interference/obstruction rules are decently complicated
@ericwildfong3 ай бұрын
So.. runners getting hit by a thrown ball to first are interfering? In my world, the base runner gets the benefit of the doubt. The man has to run the baseline, it's not his fault the defender can't aim.
@timothywalker8018 ай бұрын
Obstruction on the guy who fielded the ball - that's a new one.
@MaydayAggro Жыл бұрын
I stopped watching a little over halfway through. He wouldn’t let the video clip go to the resolution to even sure what the call was in so many of these.
@HealthyHearts Жыл бұрын
😊
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Thumbnail ump giving the universal “don’t do that” sign 😂
@cougar2013 Жыл бұрын
😂
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Intentionally hitting the umpire? My hero.
@CommodoreFloopjack78 Жыл бұрын
😂
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
I don't believe it was intentional. Sometimes catchers get crossed up.
@kevinadrian9366 Жыл бұрын
@@kevinadrian9366 If the clip had played out instead of having been cut off when it was, you would have heard the play-by-play commentator mention that the umpire had recently missed an obvious strike call. The battery were trying to wake up the umpire.
@arinerm1331 Жыл бұрын
@@arinerm1331 Plus an earlier questionable strike three call on a Tigers' batter and ejections of the Tigers' starting catcher and manager for arguing over the call you mention above.
@RobertShubitowski2 ай бұрын
Here's an idea: cut down on the number of plays and let the explanations from the announcers or umpires come through. I know the rules of baseball inside and out as a former umpire with 3000 games officiated. Most people don't have that kind of knowledge.
@garygemmell34883 ай бұрын
So many of these involved Ahmed, what in the world.
@basicguy9910 ай бұрын
I always wondered what happened to Edward Scissorhands. Apparently, he's editing your videos.
@indyspotes33102 ай бұрын
Shouldn't professional baseball commentators know that it's called "obstruction" when a baserunner is hindered by the defense?
@reformCopyright Жыл бұрын
I came to comments just to say that few things irritate me more than an announcer with 30 years expereince calling obstruction "interference." Since you're already here on top, I'll reply instead of posting my own. But the answer is "yes."
@kurtissjacobs5618 Жыл бұрын
Oh criminy, then we finally have an announcer saying "obstruction" and it was runner interference see 12:08.
@kurtissjacobs5618 Жыл бұрын
Or just call it offensive or defensive interference. Offensive if the offensive player interfered with the play, or defensively if the defensive player interfered.
@screwthisin3 ай бұрын
Saying that that was them intentionally hitting the umpire is one of the dumbest things I have seen in awhile. Hmm...I'm going to throw it hope it doesn't hit the batters bat or body, hope the catcher misses it (and if he's in on it make sure it looks like an accident). That is just silly.
@jamesrichardson3818 ай бұрын
Dude these clips infuriate me😂
@NUBBO123 Жыл бұрын
😂
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
5:18 It was not interference in the 1975 World Series. When Larry Barnett did not make the call on Ambrister. His non-call made him famous.
@riff2072 Жыл бұрын
I love this video, the plays are great but whoever set it up did a SORRY job. WAY TOO MANY plays were cut off not knowing the result. LET THE PLAY FINISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@richierasmussen30862 ай бұрын
Why is a runner with his back turned away from the player throwing the ball interfering when he's just trying to get to base? That rule needs to be removed.
@youtubecommenter25273 ай бұрын
A-Rod knocking the ball oout of Arroyo's glove in the 2003 ALCS should have been on this video.
@komickaze8510 ай бұрын
I was looking for that. Has to be the most famous interference play ever just about.
@rubewaddell17048 ай бұрын
You need to improve your editing skills. You cut the plays short before the story even gets told.
@frankmiller91578 ай бұрын
Bro Ahmed in like every clip
@matthuepatterson5597 Жыл бұрын
😂
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
You cut them all too short.
@joea7876 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching bro
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
@@hospedajepr I’m subscribed to SEVERAL DIFFERENT sports channels and they ALL have INTIRE clips posted in their videos without any issues! He’s the ONLY channel that does this!
@laurakruk4692 Жыл бұрын
@@laurakruk4692 intire clips well he only does entire KZhead videos. Thanks for your comments, have an intire beautiful day ;-)
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
@@hospedajepr That's not why or how COPYRIGHT works. Top All Sports should learn to insert some educational comments. ) > "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
@bluecadillac Жыл бұрын
Should change the name of the video to “baseball in-play bloopers” because thats what this is. Because despite them being illegal, there all mostly failed plays.
@k29king111 ай бұрын
It's kinda interesting how many times Ahmed comes up in here.
@alexandermason3845 Жыл бұрын
1:06 if the catcher runs into the batter, and the ball is the other direction, how is that interference? Ball is to the left side, foul, and catcher runs forward fair to make the 'interference call'.
@ingiford175 Жыл бұрын
Yes
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Have you ever caught a high pop up like that? The ball does not go straight up and it does not come straight down. The batter needs to know where the catcher is and stay out of his way.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
Which is why as the hitter you need to immediately leave the area after contact is made. Not just stand there looking around.
@briancallaway1690 Жыл бұрын
12:12 that’s bs the first baseman came all the way over in front of the second baseman
@michaeltaylor4271 Жыл бұрын
So what? he was trying to field a batted ball and he has the absolute right of way. The runner is out for interference.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
First base needs the double bag with this rule, makes it cut and dry.
@jondp214 Жыл бұрын
This should be titled "a lot of bad baseball calls"
@emdubl3 ай бұрын
The runner's lane plays are painful to watch... we all know the rule, so until it's changed get outside the line and figure out how to step on the bag from there. This should not be difficult.
@Desirsar Жыл бұрын
First base needs the double bag
@jondp214 Жыл бұрын
@@jondp214 Yes, but the runners still need to figure out how to run in the correct lane until then.
@Desirsar Жыл бұрын
"You can't do that!" clap clap clapclapclap
@shanetography Жыл бұрын
The very first play is NOT a balk. It's a violation of rule 5.06. The catcher used his mask to stop the ball. It's the detached equipment rule.
@michaelstetson6890 Жыл бұрын
Dude play through the play ....
@craighanson-rc1md7 ай бұрын
Maybe let the clips go a little longer. No idea what happened in half of them.
@nickhogue6465 Жыл бұрын
Luv u bro❤!
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
❤️
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
I heard "Ahmed" so many times 😅 dude plays super rough
@lordaizen800410 ай бұрын
In the very first clip, the announcers got it wrong. They said "balk. The pitcher did not come to a complete stop possibly". That is not what happened. The reason the runners were allowed to advance one base is because the catcher illegally touched the ball with his catcher's mask. That is illegal in baseball. It is explained in this video kzhead.info/sun/nMyimJF5rqWupKs/bejne.html
@911jedi8 Жыл бұрын
Yeah, we'd have known that if he didn't cut the clips so incredibly short. Such a shame, could have been a cool video.
@ross-carlson8 ай бұрын
6:13 he clearly sticks out his arm in order to draw obstruction and he got it.
@coltino99 Жыл бұрын
I wish these broadcasters would learn the difference between interference and obstruction
@granthampubunderground Жыл бұрын
Some of these are the worst excuses of 'rules' ever. A runner running straight down the line to first base, someone behind him throws the ball directly at him, hitting him..... obstruction?
@SSXVegeta Жыл бұрын
I don't really understand this rule either. I don't watch baseball, but this rule doesn't make sense to me.
@grumpyref Жыл бұрын
First of all, it is interference, not obstruction. The runner needs to be in the running lane to avoid interfering with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
@alanhess930611 ай бұрын
Whatever happened Im sure the umps got it wrong and half the time the Dodgers were the culprit.
@BlazingShackles Жыл бұрын
8:30 where the hell is the runner supposed to go? He's basically already on the base when the throw gets there.
@CapAnson123452 ай бұрын
He should be in the running lane, which would protect him from interfering.
@alanhess93062 ай бұрын
suprised you didnt include pete roses illegal miscondust with minors, that was the most illegal moment in baseball, still a great vid tho
@smoceany94782 ай бұрын
Sorry, I don't understand what the final decision was on several plays. Please restore the explanations of the play.
@bluecadillac Жыл бұрын
thank you for cutting all the videos short so we didnt get a chance to see what illegal acts were called.
@stevenkingston5114 күн бұрын
Too many of the clips are being cut off, before I can see the results of the play.
@vincentrobinette1507 Жыл бұрын
Yeah okay Ynoa looked as if he were trying to obstruct the runner, but if the runner had been in his 3' lane as he was supposed to be, there would have been no contact. I could see "that's nothing" on that one.
@kurtissjacobs5618 Жыл бұрын
right? If he just stayed on the baseline (or even on the dirt) he would've been fine.
@sethranney Жыл бұрын
The runner does not have to be in the running lane. He can run wherever he wants. The rule is if he was out of the lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, he would be out. But that is not what happened in this video. Obstruction on the pitcher was the correct call.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
Runner's lane only comes into play on a throw to first.
@MaydayAggro Жыл бұрын
@@alanhess9306 obstruction on the pitcher was absolutely the worst call. He fielded the ball and had it in his glove when the runner collided with him. Notice the first baseman's glove is empty?
@MaydayAggro Жыл бұрын
@@MaydayAggro Watch it again and pay attention this time. The pitcher did not have the ball, F3 had the ball and the pitcher was between the runner and F3. Try again.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
You need to let the play and play call end. You're cutting the clips too short.
@SpruceOaks Жыл бұрын
You forgot "Slappy" Alex Rodriguez
@66edoug Жыл бұрын
As someone who's trying to increase my knowledge of the rulebook, this could have been really interesting, but with most of the replays and commentary missing, it's too difficult to follow.
@Keifsanderson Жыл бұрын
You're right. But I enjoyed the video by embracing the mystery of it all.
@polarvortex3294 Жыл бұрын
Close Call Sports is much better at explaining rules.
@alanhess93062 ай бұрын
@@alanhess9306 I'll check it out. Thanks.
@Keifsanderson2 ай бұрын
Listening to the announcers so ignorantly calling obstruction interference and calling interference obstruction makes me crazy.
@OriginalCoastalDistancing3 ай бұрын
9:34 I think that call was kinda crap if you ask me, that was a pretty normal movement by the batter and he wasent even in the way, he didn’t slow up the catcher any and he still made a good throw so not sure why there was interference
@michaeltaylor4271 Жыл бұрын
The batter moved out over the plate interfering with the catcher. Interference was the correct call.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
Lack of context = lack of entertainment
@PsychoThirteen Жыл бұрын
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max
@hospedajepr Жыл бұрын
I can deal with the unknown broken rules, but I despise cheaters.
@reedr7142 Жыл бұрын
You cut away too quickly. No one knows what the plays are for the most part. You need to show the final results.
@gregheaney6731 Жыл бұрын
As with many of these baseball compilations, there is no context. No explanation of what happemed and why.
@georgemckinney304911 ай бұрын
Why they gave him 1st base is beyond me. He didn't block the runner until he had the ball in his glove. And the runner was out of the running lane, as well. Terrible call.
@adamwatkins1150 Жыл бұрын
The running lane is irrelevant on this play.
@alanhess93062 ай бұрын
I don’t understand when a player throws a ball at the runner and they call the runner out?
@rickbijl7031 Жыл бұрын
That happens when the runner is out of the running lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
@alanhess9306 Жыл бұрын
Please leave the call in these clips
@dougman2311 ай бұрын
The announcers not knowing the difference between obstruction (defensive team) and interference (offensive team) is infuriating.
@zakaryjester843411 ай бұрын
Obstruction is on the defense. Interference is on the offense.
@davidforbes439211 ай бұрын
@@davidforbes4392 that's... Exactly what I said
@zakaryjester843411 ай бұрын
What about A-Roid slapping the ball out of the fielders play at first base?
@soupdragonuk Жыл бұрын
Why you cut the videos so short. Whats the point if you dont know the outcome
@dirtybirds4202000 Жыл бұрын
Baseball has some of the stupidest rules
@barretblake2 ай бұрын
I hate the new rules.
@grccmo5687 Жыл бұрын
Me too
@TopAllSports Жыл бұрын
Why did the ball touching the catchers mask matter
@Owenbalcarcel258 ай бұрын
I honestly miss like, 80s 90s and 00s sports... back when defense mattered, when everyone wasn't soft. And Im young like Im in my 30s, not some boomer here but I understand how thing are now. Gotta protect the athletes, it makes sense but, you don't see many exciting plays like the Albert Belle one for example, guys using their body to intimidate has always been a part of the game. Yeah you're out if you do that but you should not get suspended by any means for a play like that. But nowadays you might... IDK. It's why guys like Tom Brady and Lebron James will never be among the best in their sport, they've been so heavily protected that they've had an advantage 10 times greater than say, steroids would give a player. They don't have to take any hits compared to players in previous eras like Montana Bradshaw Aikman Elway, Jordan Jabbar Bird Iverson Thomas Barkley Robinson Malone etc, even say, Kobe Bryant for example. He won his championships in seasons where you had NBA finals games being 81-76. Now? Noone plays defense, and you got 120-115 games with guys like Lebron Harden and Curry playing zero defense, standing there shooting 3's without having to drive the ball. Early Career Lebron I respected, same with Brady. Late career, not so much, just overprotected faces of the league who win scripted-fixed titles cause them winning makes the most money for each league.
@MoneyHoneyBunny Жыл бұрын
You said you aren't a boomer, then gave the most boomer response ever
@camc909310 ай бұрын
@@camc9093 You must be seriously depressed and lonely to even reply. Me? I'm waiting for my beautiful fiancee to get out of the shower so I've got a minute to put you in your place. Hows that super bowl choke taste still after all these years? Gotta suck knowing the Seahawks shoulda had a dynasty. And what happened to your NBA team? Good luck with the shitty NHL team your city bought.
@MoneyHoneyBunny10 ай бұрын
Tough to understand how you obstruct a runner to first base in fair territory. The runner should simply not be there, hence so many interference calls in favour of the fielding team. Some consistency here would be helpful.
@zelandakhniteblade543611 ай бұрын
It is interference if the runner is out of the lane AND interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
@alanhess930611 ай бұрын
Poorly put together. Seem to lost the “thread” of what the video was about.
@louisreed7809 Жыл бұрын
At 1:02 The pitcher who the runner ran into, not the other way around, had the ball in his glove. So how is it that the umps called it obstruction and not a simple tag?
@Manolo052811 ай бұрын
Probably because the first baseman was acting as a wall of sorts
@rickhaavisto902311 ай бұрын
Sure but the runner has to be to the right of the baseline. He is breaking the rules by even being there. He’s clearly left of the baseline. And the ball was caught on the fly while the runner breaks the rules of where to run and then was still awarded the bag 😂
@jonjurgens74128 ай бұрын
@@jonjurgens7412 The ball was no caught on the fly. If it was, there'd be no obstruction. The batter only has to run to the right of the baseline if he wants protection for RLI. If he doesn't want protection, he can run wherever he wants
@rickhaavisto90238 ай бұрын
@@rickhaavisto9023 i encourage you to refresh the running one to first base, and I don’t think it involves running into the grass to make purposeful contact with a fielder. But sure maybe you’re right.
@jonjurgens74128 ай бұрын
@@jonjurgens7412 As long as the runner isn’t judged to make malicious contact with a fielder without the ball, it is obstruction
@rickhaavisto90238 ай бұрын
You need to let these run so the viewer hears the final outcome !!
@thomraine60010 ай бұрын
against the rules yeah. ilegal no. Nobody could be arrested.
@artful19672 ай бұрын
I love how baseball fans are idealistic about "pure game" and "unwritten rules" but it's the sport where most cheating happens possibly 😅
@andredornelles80142 ай бұрын
4:47 I'm a Yankee fan, but that wasn't illegal. He tried to get out of the way.
@lightningsamurai41345 ай бұрын
On almost all of the plays at first base the runner should be out. The lane at first base - in foul territory - is meant to keep the runner more out-of-the-way, so the defense has a better chance to make a play. The runner should be out if he is not running in that lane during a play at first. It is rarely called, however.
@325194111 ай бұрын
It is interference if the runner is out of the lane AND interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base. Simply being out of the lane is not illegal.
@alanhess930611 ай бұрын
@@alanhess9306 Thank you for the info. I seem to have forgotten that little bit of info - don't get OLD!!
@3251941Ай бұрын
@@3251941 I can't help getting old, but it's better than the alternative, right?
@alanhess9306Ай бұрын
The ump eating one is not illegal.
@pahowitzer4463 ай бұрын
Hitting the ump with a pitch isn’t against the rules, so I stopped watching.
@cbirdman11 ай бұрын
The ones where the players clearly throw it at the runner are bs and shouldn't be outs imo, especially when they hit the runner in the back going to first.
@packerpf Жыл бұрын
Most of them involve the batter taking an unorthodox path to first base to try to block the throw. You can do that on other bases but not at first.
@dleblanc Жыл бұрын
I don’t get how Peacock can get an interference call @3:00. He’s following the baseline, and it’s not like he can tell the where the ball is coming from behind him. Is he supposed to shift over out of the way while running to first?
@KarnivorActual11 ай бұрын
It is a clearly running lane interference, absolutely the correct call.
@alanhess93062 ай бұрын
Commentary on what happened ???
@stephen4763 Жыл бұрын
very cool vid
@cgoodiefunk Жыл бұрын
No Jeter slapping the ball as he runs to first in the 2004 ALCS game 6?
You do great videos but don't cut away from the play so quickly. Show enough so we see what the call is.
Thanks bro
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max.
@@hospedajepr I think your making nonsense up.
@@samobaraa Sorry, I’m just an attorney. Still learning, have a nice day 😉
@Hospe Daje but the clips are longer then 5 seconds?
This isnt a good video. You need to show what the rulings end up being for any of this to have any meaning whatsoever.
This is interesting to watch all these strange plays - but it would be nice to know what the final ruling is on some of these. Mostly, we never know.
yeah... i gave up 3 mins in... It was most unsatisfying
Agree. This is too choppy and jumps from one to the next too quickly.
@@brianarbenz13290
Totally agree, also can't assume every watcher knows what rules are being broken (eg what was Illegal about the pitch that hit the umpire). Title of video is Illegal moments, so I am assuming there is something not allowed in the play. To my understanding of baseball (which isn't much, I'm Australian and don't follow MLB) there is nothing wrong with the play, just the umpire being unlucky.
I love to see good umps not giving players a Hit-Batter call and even better calling Strikes on pitches when batters lean into them.
I wonder if anyone has been hit by a pitch twice in one at bat after not being awarded first base the first time.
Don’t cut the clip so short. You’re leaving out the explanations of what happened.
Sorry bro Thanks for watching
Yeah, I didn't finish watching.
@@stevegabbert9626 Yeah between the title and how badly cut this is its unwatchable
Yeah, sadly this made an otherwise cool video unwatchable.
I always love Scott Servais's look of irritation. It's one of the great things in baseball.
Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell
MLB interference calls are confusing. The runner has to allow defense to attempt a play, and defense can't get in the way of the runner. How does that work?
For each play where there can be a play made on the ball, the closest umpire decides which defensive player is most likely, in their opinion, to make the play (99% of the time, this is an obvious choice). That player has right of way to fielding the ball, and even if their attempt to field the batted ball gets in the way of the runner, as long as they are in the act of fielding, the runner must avoid them. Any other fielder that gets in the way of the runner is committing obstruction, and once that fielder is no longer in the process of fielding the batted ball, and does not possess the ball, they must also clear out of the way of the runner or they will be committing obstruction.
@@OngakuSensei86Even possessing the ball doesn't necessarily protect them from being called for obstruction. It's less likely since they'll likely be making a play on the runner, but still possible.
When players go out of their way in getting an obstruction/interference call, they should call the player out or the runner allowed to take the base. Ynoa was maybe a foot or two in the field of play maybe just off the base path and the player just reaches out and touches him and they call Ynoa for obstructing the runner.
The standard is "hinders or impeeds" for obstruction and I believe also interference. Sounds like a case of type 2 or type B obstruction which isn't an automatic base award like type 1 or type A. Type 2 is protection to the base which in the umpires judgement would of been safely reached without the obstruction and the ball remains live. Advancing beyond this base can be done at the runners own peril (essentially "nullify the act" and only enforced if needed). Additionally per the rule book the base path only officially exists when there's a play being made on a runner, in all other cases they are essentially free to run where they want and technically it's up to the defence to avoid them.
That very first one was NOT....ABSOLUTELY NOT....a balk. That was a violation of the "detached equipment" rule. You can't use equipment (i.e., a face mask), detached from it's normal wear on your body to make a play on a live ball.
I'm not up on umpire mechanics, but apparently it's signed as a balk and charged to the pitcher as a balk, and the runners, if any, advance.
@@skydiverclassc2031 Actually the correct signal for a balk is a "delayed dead ball" whereas the signal for detached equipment is "dead ball". Most umpires don't know the difference.
@@skydiverclassc2031 The point to the ground/catcher by the umpire is not the balk mechanic. You also don't kill play immediately for a balk, you need to let it play out. I believe if a runner successfully steals a base on a balk they don't get another base (but I could be wrong). The penalty for most defensive violations is runners advancing (since that's the only real negative the defence have), while for the offence it's a strike or an out. Sometimes you see balls awarded because of a violation by the defence (going to the mouth, and pitch clock rules come to mind) but much less common that base awards.
There was a couple plays where the incident happens off camera. Too many smash cuts and several it doesn't even say what the ruling was.
These are being cut off way too fast! Can't tell what actually happened 🤷🏾♂️
Please keep it going till we know what happened with rulings, awarded bases, etc.
Announcers need to know the difference between interference (offense) and obstruction (defense).
While you're technically correct, interference is not specific to offensive players. It also extends to catchers, umpires, any player that isn't in the game, and fans.
Jesus loves you alot trust in His death 4 salvation and be saved from eternal hell
Yes, except that interference is on the defensive and obstruction is on the offense. I use catchers interference to help remember.
@@chavamitzen1894 Catchers interference is the "oddity" where it's the catcher that gets in the way of the batter swinging the bat. Interference is typically committed by the offence involving hindering or impeding the defence, while obstruction involves the defence hindering or impeding the offence. Spectator and umpire interference are similar in that they involve a spectator or umpire hindering or impeding the defence. Both interference (all types) and obstruction while some have prescribed penalties generally follow the mantra of "Nullify the act" or in other words, position runners based on what in the umpires judgement would of happened had there been no interference, in some cases that means letting the result stand. Say a runner trips over a fielder who isn't fielding the ball (Type 2 Obstruction), but they still make it in safely. You don't enforce additional penalties because the trip didn't result in an unfair advantage for the defence (didn't hinder or impede the runner enough to change the result). Alternatively, suppose the same runner trips rounding second, but then gets out halfway to home. Again it's Type 2 Obstruction so if the umps determine he wouldn't of scored anyway he's still out. Its only really in the close plays where type 2 obstruction really comes into play. You can even hear the umpire in one of the clips calling obstruction as "Thats interference" so even pro umps can't keep the two straight sometimes.
Let each clip run a lil longer so we can see what the exact rulings are. Good video
Agree with most comments..these clips are interesting BUT they cut off way TOO SOON.
I used to be fast enough that I could reverse direction during a run down just as they threw the ball and run into them, always got the base.
Nice tactic
@@TopAllSports our coach taught us to stay out of the base line so that couldn’t happen and you weren’t throwing over the runner either.
An explanation of what happened & why would be better.
Not sure what is so 'illegal' about most or even all of these plays. More than anything, they're just bloopers.
Many of these cuts are too quick. We can't necessarily tell what was called in each case. 1:17, for instance. Last thing we hear is "out at first", but there appears to have been obstruction on the catcher when the runner ran into his back as the pitcher went after the ball. Was that called?
That game 3 of the Cards and Red Sox series was my favorite
Elvis Andrus shows up quite a few times here
Tough way to lose or end a game. Got a new subscriber. Was fun to watch. Great video
maybe let some clips play out? some of them I have no idea of the outcome...otherwise thank you!!
I was at that Oakland vs Boston game at Fenway. That was game 3 of the 2003 ALDS. A's won the first two game of the 5 game series and gave away two runs in game 3 then lost games 4 and 5. Was the series that set up the 2003 ALCS where Grady Little did not take Pedro out of the game and he lost the lead. Yankees when on to win in game 7 with a Boone homerun but the Marlins won the World Series.
You have excellent videos, did your editor just had an off day? I still am a fan of your videos. Just seemed the editing was a little sloppy. But thank you for the entertainment
Would be good to see some info on the why's and how's of why these plays were illegal. Some are obvious but others need some explanation and slo-mo ect. Otherwise it was an interesting video. FYI I'm an Australian with an interest in mlb so a lot of the finicky rules I'm ignorant of.
@@LiamG4 Thankyou for that. Some of the throws looked deliberately thrown into the runner but the runner was penalized. Doesn't seem fair.
@@Rodent1970If you're talking about the Runners Lane interference ones (throws to first from the home plate area), the runner isn't protected running outside the runners lane in the last 45ft to first (supposed to be in foul territory up the first base line). He can leave the lane in the last step or two to reach the base, but if he never entered he can't leave. The throws might be deliberate but the runner also isn't where he's supposed to be and he's "in the way" so by rule you have RLI (Runners Lane Interference). Baseball interference/obstruction rules are decently complicated
So.. runners getting hit by a thrown ball to first are interfering? In my world, the base runner gets the benefit of the doubt. The man has to run the baseline, it's not his fault the defender can't aim.
Obstruction on the guy who fielded the ball - that's a new one.
I stopped watching a little over halfway through. He wouldn’t let the video clip go to the resolution to even sure what the call was in so many of these.
😊
Thumbnail ump giving the universal “don’t do that” sign 😂
😂
Intentionally hitting the umpire? My hero.
😂
I don't believe it was intentional. Sometimes catchers get crossed up.
@@kevinadrian9366 If the clip had played out instead of having been cut off when it was, you would have heard the play-by-play commentator mention that the umpire had recently missed an obvious strike call. The battery were trying to wake up the umpire.
@@arinerm1331 Plus an earlier questionable strike three call on a Tigers' batter and ejections of the Tigers' starting catcher and manager for arguing over the call you mention above.
Here's an idea: cut down on the number of plays and let the explanations from the announcers or umpires come through. I know the rules of baseball inside and out as a former umpire with 3000 games officiated. Most people don't have that kind of knowledge.
So many of these involved Ahmed, what in the world.
I always wondered what happened to Edward Scissorhands. Apparently, he's editing your videos.
Shouldn't professional baseball commentators know that it's called "obstruction" when a baserunner is hindered by the defense?
I came to comments just to say that few things irritate me more than an announcer with 30 years expereince calling obstruction "interference." Since you're already here on top, I'll reply instead of posting my own. But the answer is "yes."
Oh criminy, then we finally have an announcer saying "obstruction" and it was runner interference see 12:08.
Or just call it offensive or defensive interference. Offensive if the offensive player interfered with the play, or defensively if the defensive player interfered.
Saying that that was them intentionally hitting the umpire is one of the dumbest things I have seen in awhile. Hmm...I'm going to throw it hope it doesn't hit the batters bat or body, hope the catcher misses it (and if he's in on it make sure it looks like an accident). That is just silly.
Dude these clips infuriate me😂
😂
5:18 It was not interference in the 1975 World Series. When Larry Barnett did not make the call on Ambrister. His non-call made him famous.
I love this video, the plays are great but whoever set it up did a SORRY job. WAY TOO MANY plays were cut off not knowing the result. LET THE PLAY FINISH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why is a runner with his back turned away from the player throwing the ball interfering when he's just trying to get to base? That rule needs to be removed.
A-Rod knocking the ball oout of Arroyo's glove in the 2003 ALCS should have been on this video.
I was looking for that. Has to be the most famous interference play ever just about.
You need to improve your editing skills. You cut the plays short before the story even gets told.
Bro Ahmed in like every clip
😂
You cut them all too short.
Thanks for watching bro
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max
@@hospedajepr I’m subscribed to SEVERAL DIFFERENT sports channels and they ALL have INTIRE clips posted in their videos without any issues! He’s the ONLY channel that does this!
@@laurakruk4692 intire clips well he only does entire KZhead videos. Thanks for your comments, have an intire beautiful day ;-)
@@hospedajepr That's not why or how COPYRIGHT works. Top All Sports should learn to insert some educational comments. ) > "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: Allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing."
Should change the name of the video to “baseball in-play bloopers” because thats what this is. Because despite them being illegal, there all mostly failed plays.
It's kinda interesting how many times Ahmed comes up in here.
1:06 if the catcher runs into the batter, and the ball is the other direction, how is that interference? Ball is to the left side, foul, and catcher runs forward fair to make the 'interference call'.
Yes
Have you ever caught a high pop up like that? The ball does not go straight up and it does not come straight down. The batter needs to know where the catcher is and stay out of his way.
Which is why as the hitter you need to immediately leave the area after contact is made. Not just stand there looking around.
12:12 that’s bs the first baseman came all the way over in front of the second baseman
So what? he was trying to field a batted ball and he has the absolute right of way. The runner is out for interference.
First base needs the double bag with this rule, makes it cut and dry.
This should be titled "a lot of bad baseball calls"
The runner's lane plays are painful to watch... we all know the rule, so until it's changed get outside the line and figure out how to step on the bag from there. This should not be difficult.
First base needs the double bag
@@jondp214 Yes, but the runners still need to figure out how to run in the correct lane until then.
"You can't do that!" clap clap clapclapclap
The very first play is NOT a balk. It's a violation of rule 5.06. The catcher used his mask to stop the ball. It's the detached equipment rule.
Dude play through the play ....
Maybe let the clips go a little longer. No idea what happened in half of them.
Luv u bro❤!
❤️
I heard "Ahmed" so many times 😅 dude plays super rough
In the very first clip, the announcers got it wrong. They said "balk. The pitcher did not come to a complete stop possibly". That is not what happened. The reason the runners were allowed to advance one base is because the catcher illegally touched the ball with his catcher's mask. That is illegal in baseball. It is explained in this video kzhead.info/sun/nMyimJF5rqWupKs/bejne.html
Yeah, we'd have known that if he didn't cut the clips so incredibly short. Such a shame, could have been a cool video.
6:13 he clearly sticks out his arm in order to draw obstruction and he got it.
I wish these broadcasters would learn the difference between interference and obstruction
Some of these are the worst excuses of 'rules' ever. A runner running straight down the line to first base, someone behind him throws the ball directly at him, hitting him..... obstruction?
I don't really understand this rule either. I don't watch baseball, but this rule doesn't make sense to me.
First of all, it is interference, not obstruction. The runner needs to be in the running lane to avoid interfering with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
Whatever happened Im sure the umps got it wrong and half the time the Dodgers were the culprit.
8:30 where the hell is the runner supposed to go? He's basically already on the base when the throw gets there.
He should be in the running lane, which would protect him from interfering.
suprised you didnt include pete roses illegal miscondust with minors, that was the most illegal moment in baseball, still a great vid tho
Sorry, I don't understand what the final decision was on several plays. Please restore the explanations of the play.
thank you for cutting all the videos short so we didnt get a chance to see what illegal acts were called.
Too many of the clips are being cut off, before I can see the results of the play.
Yeah okay Ynoa looked as if he were trying to obstruct the runner, but if the runner had been in his 3' lane as he was supposed to be, there would have been no contact. I could see "that's nothing" on that one.
right? If he just stayed on the baseline (or even on the dirt) he would've been fine.
The runner does not have to be in the running lane. He can run wherever he wants. The rule is if he was out of the lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base, he would be out. But that is not what happened in this video. Obstruction on the pitcher was the correct call.
Runner's lane only comes into play on a throw to first.
@@alanhess9306 obstruction on the pitcher was absolutely the worst call. He fielded the ball and had it in his glove when the runner collided with him. Notice the first baseman's glove is empty?
@@MaydayAggro Watch it again and pay attention this time. The pitcher did not have the ball, F3 had the ball and the pitcher was between the runner and F3. Try again.
You need to let the play and play call end. You're cutting the clips too short.
You forgot "Slappy" Alex Rodriguez
As someone who's trying to increase my knowledge of the rulebook, this could have been really interesting, but with most of the replays and commentary missing, it's too difficult to follow.
You're right. But I enjoyed the video by embracing the mystery of it all.
Close Call Sports is much better at explaining rules.
@@alanhess9306 I'll check it out. Thanks.
Listening to the announcers so ignorantly calling obstruction interference and calling interference obstruction makes me crazy.
9:34 I think that call was kinda crap if you ask me, that was a pretty normal movement by the batter and he wasent even in the way, he didn’t slow up the catcher any and he still made a good throw so not sure why there was interference
The batter moved out over the plate interfering with the catcher. Interference was the correct call.
Lack of context = lack of entertainment
Do to copyright issues he probably has to cut early if not then he may get a copyright strike. I think it’s 5 secs max
I can deal with the unknown broken rules, but I despise cheaters.
You cut away too quickly. No one knows what the plays are for the most part. You need to show the final results.
As with many of these baseball compilations, there is no context. No explanation of what happemed and why.
Why they gave him 1st base is beyond me. He didn't block the runner until he had the ball in his glove. And the runner was out of the running lane, as well. Terrible call.
The running lane is irrelevant on this play.
I don’t understand when a player throws a ball at the runner and they call the runner out?
That happens when the runner is out of the running lane and interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
Please leave the call in these clips
The announcers not knowing the difference between obstruction (defensive team) and interference (offensive team) is infuriating.
Obstruction is on the defense. Interference is on the offense.
@@davidforbes4392 that's... Exactly what I said
What about A-Roid slapping the ball out of the fielders play at first base?
Why you cut the videos so short. Whats the point if you dont know the outcome
Baseball has some of the stupidest rules
I hate the new rules.
Me too
Why did the ball touching the catchers mask matter
I honestly miss like, 80s 90s and 00s sports... back when defense mattered, when everyone wasn't soft. And Im young like Im in my 30s, not some boomer here but I understand how thing are now. Gotta protect the athletes, it makes sense but, you don't see many exciting plays like the Albert Belle one for example, guys using their body to intimidate has always been a part of the game. Yeah you're out if you do that but you should not get suspended by any means for a play like that. But nowadays you might... IDK. It's why guys like Tom Brady and Lebron James will never be among the best in their sport, they've been so heavily protected that they've had an advantage 10 times greater than say, steroids would give a player. They don't have to take any hits compared to players in previous eras like Montana Bradshaw Aikman Elway, Jordan Jabbar Bird Iverson Thomas Barkley Robinson Malone etc, even say, Kobe Bryant for example. He won his championships in seasons where you had NBA finals games being 81-76. Now? Noone plays defense, and you got 120-115 games with guys like Lebron Harden and Curry playing zero defense, standing there shooting 3's without having to drive the ball. Early Career Lebron I respected, same with Brady. Late career, not so much, just overprotected faces of the league who win scripted-fixed titles cause them winning makes the most money for each league.
You said you aren't a boomer, then gave the most boomer response ever
@@camc9093 You must be seriously depressed and lonely to even reply. Me? I'm waiting for my beautiful fiancee to get out of the shower so I've got a minute to put you in your place. Hows that super bowl choke taste still after all these years? Gotta suck knowing the Seahawks shoulda had a dynasty. And what happened to your NBA team? Good luck with the shitty NHL team your city bought.
Tough to understand how you obstruct a runner to first base in fair territory. The runner should simply not be there, hence so many interference calls in favour of the fielding team. Some consistency here would be helpful.
It is interference if the runner is out of the lane AND interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base.
Poorly put together. Seem to lost the “thread” of what the video was about.
At 1:02 The pitcher who the runner ran into, not the other way around, had the ball in his glove. So how is it that the umps called it obstruction and not a simple tag?
Probably because the first baseman was acting as a wall of sorts
Sure but the runner has to be to the right of the baseline. He is breaking the rules by even being there. He’s clearly left of the baseline. And the ball was caught on the fly while the runner breaks the rules of where to run and then was still awarded the bag 😂
@@jonjurgens7412 The ball was no caught on the fly. If it was, there'd be no obstruction. The batter only has to run to the right of the baseline if he wants protection for RLI. If he doesn't want protection, he can run wherever he wants
@@rickhaavisto9023 i encourage you to refresh the running one to first base, and I don’t think it involves running into the grass to make purposeful contact with a fielder. But sure maybe you’re right.
@@jonjurgens7412 As long as the runner isn’t judged to make malicious contact with a fielder without the ball, it is obstruction
You need to let these run so the viewer hears the final outcome !!
against the rules yeah. ilegal no. Nobody could be arrested.
I love how baseball fans are idealistic about "pure game" and "unwritten rules" but it's the sport where most cheating happens possibly 😅
4:47 I'm a Yankee fan, but that wasn't illegal. He tried to get out of the way.
On almost all of the plays at first base the runner should be out. The lane at first base - in foul territory - is meant to keep the runner more out-of-the-way, so the defense has a better chance to make a play. The runner should be out if he is not running in that lane during a play at first. It is rarely called, however.
It is interference if the runner is out of the lane AND interferes with the fielder taking the throw at first base. Simply being out of the lane is not illegal.
@@alanhess9306 Thank you for the info. I seem to have forgotten that little bit of info - don't get OLD!!
@@3251941 I can't help getting old, but it's better than the alternative, right?
The ump eating one is not illegal.
Hitting the ump with a pitch isn’t against the rules, so I stopped watching.
The ones where the players clearly throw it at the runner are bs and shouldn't be outs imo, especially when they hit the runner in the back going to first.
Most of them involve the batter taking an unorthodox path to first base to try to block the throw. You can do that on other bases but not at first.
I don’t get how Peacock can get an interference call @3:00. He’s following the baseline, and it’s not like he can tell the where the ball is coming from behind him. Is he supposed to shift over out of the way while running to first?
It is a clearly running lane interference, absolutely the correct call.
Commentary on what happened ???
very cool vid
No Jeter slapping the ball as he runs to first in the 2004 ALCS game 6?