The Evil Within A Beautiful Mess

The grim beard himself!

When are you going to cover this gem you goth?

Deja vu.

Wow grimbeard himself on sphere hunter. Can't get more awesome than that

I'm still watching the video but here's a really dumb thing I'd like to point out: so he says he's always low on ammo cause he can't hold more then he says he's always got ammo no matter how dire the situation is. What?

I feel you, this game comforted me so much. I love all the battles with Keeper

the evil within is the real depression.

I had just lost my job when I played it, def an awesome distraction hehe.

They have devices now that can literally just scan your full body appearance into a program? Like if I was rich, and wanted a game made about me, I could actually go to the studio or workspace, and have my whole body scanned in? And they'd just touch it up and add details to finish making the model look like me? Is that how it works or am I way off?

@@jakethesnake4040 Well, the full body scanners are these huge devices that are pretty expensive, but yeah. Common in Vfx especially for digital double work. However, what @Lying Figure is talking about is an alternative called photogrammetry, which is less expensive and is a method of extrapolating 3d shapes from a series of sequential photographs. It's gotten pretty good lately.

@@jakethesnake4040 Like Lying Figure said, you don't need to be rich. A good quality camera, good lighting and a podium to rotate you while you T-pose are all you need.

Then why don't any of the other characters have similar scans in their underwear?

@@goten339 Because the dev team probably wanted her character to have more realism in the shaping. There's some stylization and adjustment for sure, but it probably started life as a scan. Hands always have to be made bigger too(scan data hands are very tiny). Her character wears tighter closes where as the male characters are in suits and you don't see the silhouettes of their body's physique compared to Kidman's. Female character modeling is actually very difficult(the female character in the last game I worked on was a struggle), way harder than a typical male character. The more subtle the shapes and forms, the harder to nail and the easier to screw up and have it look bad.

Nah I don’t remember

Exactly, although I don't hate the sequel, I feel the linear take the first game made whenever the environment changed all around me made me go "Ah man where the hell am I now?"

The first one was way more scary for sure, but the sequel is just as good tho i really enjoyed the exploration aspect of the game

Weird because I felt the exact opposite, it felt like at any point something could attack me. Though this only applies to the first act, after it's a shoot fest

i felt the exact opposite, especially when i activated the ghost lady from the sebastian PTSD sidequest, i was on alert the whole time, always looking around for enemies that could sneak up on me. I was calm in the evil withinh 1 beccause it was linear and just an action game most of the time, the huge amounts of ammo i had even in higher dificulties made me confident, and dying all the time just made me frustrated. The Evil Within 2 made me feel helpless, beccause in higher dificulties, i was finally worried about using too much ammo and not having as much as i wanted to, the constant optional stealth section in the second game gave me more tension. And unlike a lot of people, one of my favorite sections is Theodore's blood sea, that area made me extra carefull.

@Mass Dupp Addiction funny thing, ghostwire tokyo was supposed to be evil within 3

​@Mass Dupp Addiction from what we know it was changed in very early development. Doesn't mean we'll never get TEW3

I enjoy evil withins more then resident evil ....i don know its just me??? The second i enjoy more .....

@Mass Dupp Addiction yeah im serious lol and i have no idea why. im currently going through EW2 at the moment. So maybe the ending didnt really need a 3rd game?

I think the first game was superior in terms of gameplay as well. The second one was just boring.

You read my mind!

It’s just too easy to exploit the A.I. in 2. Stealth is king sadly.

Nah part 2 was trash. Part one, although janky, had WAY MORE soul and fun gameplay!!! Polish but the game being a turd means it’s just a polished turd!!! I’ll take an unpolished gem(The Evil Within 1) over a polished turd(The Evil Within 2) ANY DAY!!! Although both polish AND gem would be a no brainer…

The atmosphere and story as well as the designs were better in the first game but gameplay is a massive part of… well, a game. If they made an update to it that fixed at the very least the gameplay issues the game had then I think TEW would be looked back on a lot more.

Oh wow I actually prefer the story in 2 a lot more. Probably just hit harder for me since I was totally confused the whole time lol

Same. Literally everything she didn't enjoy I loved. I hate big open world scavenger hunts. Backtracking just pisses me off at this point in my life.

It is pretty fascinating. I loved just about everything about this game. My cons/issues are more on the technical side, and I didn't like a large part of the City levels. Just about everything else I was enjoying. The mood and atmosphere, the enemy designs, I loved how the game restricts you but doesn't make you fully helpless. It is what it is, but I feel she was way too critical and had unrealistic expectations and too caught up in the hype. Was weird how she complained about Horror games not allowing you to fight back, and wants a return to Survival Horror and we mostly get that in Evil Within aaaand she doesn't like it? Eh *slow shrug*.

@@senorgato4273 I actually agree tbh. I rolled my eyes at a few of her points. Especially the racoon city reference, that was cringe even Oh well everyone is different.

@@senorgato4273 How the fuck are different opinions "L"s?

And yet that's why I didn't enjoy the evil within. I love games like the RE2 remake where you have free rein to explore, but you really have to think about how to spend your resources as you solve puzzles. I like when games expect you to think and explore but subtly nudge you in the right direction with expert game design. Games that are too linear leave me feeling bored right along with most open world games that lack proper pacing and level design, it's a delicate balance.

I consider Revelations 1/2 to be the actual RE5/6. Never mind that Wesker died in one of those games, it's kind of counterbalanced by the end of Rev2 anyways.

I love RE6. It's the ultimate mash up of all the characters in the series. Was super fun playing as Sherry.

@@ireallydontcareabouthandles I could see that with revelations 1... Don't exactly see that with 2. Like yeah, it's still survival horror, but not only is a lot of characters pratical shells of themselves, but the gameplay is bogged down with your partner. It's silent hill, not resident evil

Let's be honest. Resident Evil hasn't been the same since Shinji Mikami left.

@@LadyAtoli it's a great action game I love it!

Oh yeah and I don’t like 1 but it somehow made me appreciate it more when 2 would do a call back to it. 2 was shockingly good and I think it’s a shame that it was often over looked.

fr

You mean the Headshots that don't kill half of the time because the critical hit is literally RNG?

@@StabYourBrain blood clout shut yur mouth

@@StabYourBrain Omg STFU, the game is great!!! 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

@@StabYourBrain urgh. You are awful.

The true monster is encountered by those who save with no ammo and heals

@@mateuszjasicki This is me 😭 I be using one save file for no reason

agreed every time one showed up i was running for my life.

I prefer EW 1 to EW2 as well. I just didn't like the open world aspect and felt we just never really explored fun or interesting levels like in the first game. I also had many technical issues with the sequel. Still some great stuff in it.

I like playing EW2 more but yeah the story is definitely better in 1. In 2 it’s like “okay here are twenty million villains for no reason”

yes everything was so much better and the small places that you were was amazing

I felt 2 was way more comprehensible and better written in terms of characters

@@peppinoandweskerfriendsfor3450 There's like 4 villains, which go down to 3 at the end.

Shes a cynical pos

my main issue is later in the game it just becomes unfair especially in the water section!

@@InfiniteGatsu thats a skill issue

@@symbiote3220 nah just annoying but what the 2nd half of a game is usually the weaker half anyway

If it does happen, im pretty sure another protagonist would take the spotlight, I mean Sebastian's arc is over, he saved his daughter and redeemed himself. Joseph Oda could perhaps be the next main character

@@Dukesparrow1999 but Ruvik is still alive in Evil within 1

@@aliefalfino9278 potential main antagonist of TEW3?

@@Dukesparrow1999 I mean he's not dead and Oda still missing, so yeah

lets hope it's not like the second game which was horrible.

Also Kidman's. Jennifer Carpenter was truly missed in TEW2.

I prefer the voice of Marqus Bobesich, from the sequel

Not saying you’re wrong, but I thought I did too until I played it again recently. To me, for 99% of the game, Sebastian constantly sounds mildly annoyed/surprised and it takes me out of it.

@@MrMetalforever5 I like that a lot more than the grainy voice of 2.

"Out of ammo?!"

The art direction, pacing, enemy design and atmosphere is much stronger in the first game I think. But yeah, as a game, the sequel is definitely the better game.

Yea I don’t even hate this game, but I don’t like it as much as the second game.

2 is universally panned and regarded as much worse. Wtf yall on fam. Its like some of you live in a different universe and time line. You state why 2 is so bad but also claim its a better game LOL You on some kinda drug there or what

@@jonathansoko1085 Maybe people preferred the story and character in 2? Maybe people liked that it's a much better game performance wise? On PS4, the first game struggles to get even close to a stable 30fps.

First game is definitely much better. It's basically the Resident Evil 5 we should have got after 4. The variety of encounters, pacing, level design and boss fights is really cool. Sure it was clunky and had some problems (terrible intro, after that stealth is basically not required or used much) and poorly explained mechanics (such as matches, which is a great mechanic if you know how to use it). But I love it even with these faults. And cmon, most of survival horror genre has glaring issues like Evil Within has.

Kidman in the DLC also cant run for shit :P

Amen .

Tew 2 is great

This. TEW2 is clearly more polished compared to first game but it lost it's charm.

Not saying TEW2 is bad of course

Tough to say, but both are very underappreciated in my book!

me too

It literally is not

@@Mindwalker030 It is, have you ever seen one of the very big KZheadrs or Streamers play it?

I love it. I just wish the camera didn't feel so.... janky. It makes me motion sick. It's the only 3rd person game that does that. They fixed that issue in the sequel though.

@@EinfachVille That's because it's not that good. Thus it's not underrated.

@@Mindwalker030 the second one is very underrated, the evil within 2 is the best game for me I seen popular youtubers Play and so as the first one but the fact it made a quarter of sales then the first one, like wtf it made so fucking little that literally it will never have a third part

"fad" lol

And, the big reveal to the mystery as one goes along, is that all the twisted imagery and stuff going on that seems supernatural is actually sci-fi based horror via technology of the STEM device, a matrix like artificial world comprised of many people's memories and nightmares - People that are controlled by one "master mind" whether for good or bad aka Ruvik. TEW has a really wild world premise, that basically gave fans of Resident Evil and Silent Hill series a mixed dose of psychological/supernatural/body horror all under the sci-fi based umbrella. Using technology as a form of control of the masses....

For me the most important factor was that I couldn't just run away a bit and then approach the secton anew, because you can't just easily go back into stealth mode + there was no noteworthy stealth to begin with. Sure you can approach certain situation (the carousel for example) with stealth, but it was rarely easy and once you mess up you were often forced into combat unless you reload your save.

TEW2 has grate gameplay and ots flashed out but TEW 1 has atmosphere and charm

@@shockshow9823 you're right, I really wish they would remake The Evil Within 1 like how they did with The Last of us. New graphic, mechanics to give it a modern look & feel.

Its because actually tew1 does have the better mechanics and a better approach to horror

@@theredoctopus3196 better mechanic ? Definitely not, movements were clunky but better approach to horror ? Definitely yes! Especially when you're thrown into a horror that you couldn't understand at first.

also I realy liked!

Y'all through around the word masterpiece too easily

@@sage9498 There clearly says "personally". Seems like reading isn't that easy for you.

@@rafogameplays3321 nono i understand that don't worry ☺️ i just don't understand how one could call such a game a masterpiece

@@sage9498 it's because it is. Learn to read. Usually the word personally means personally. Who made you gatekeeper of the word masterpiece

They forgot what game they were playing and went Rambo style.

@@fastwing3295 Exactly, they either went rambo style or are very bad at aiming and miss shots. They could use bottles, melee weapons, stealth, good match strike, so much to conserve ammo because thats what I did and always had ammo left over for when I needed it.

@@fastwing3295 Hell the crossbow alone is the main reason you can have too much ammo because some of the bolts can just kill entire groups of enemies. I dont understand the problem of "forcing" the player to upgrade ammo capacity, that seems more like the person playing doesnt utilize the environment to their advantage fully. I even tried to not use the crossbow as much because I felt like it was a crutch in some cases and made certain sections a bit too easy

I can tell from this video that she's not very good at the game and didn't understand how to utilize the games many different mechanics.

Yeah to me it felt like it was an interesting system because you start off really limited in what you can carry and have to work to conserve your ammo but then you find out that if you invest some green gel you can increase your carrying capacity but at the cost of not being able to get other vital upgrades like sprint out time, syringe recovery, guns & crossbow etc. for more time it creates such interesting decisions when I played. I found I was pretty good at managing my ammo by using stealth and fire or crossbow combos in combat as often as I could, so I opted to not upgrade the carrying capacity as much instead getting sprint time so I can better outrun or escape and hide from enemies, syringe recovery, and upgrading my weapons. When the game started to get more difficult in it's encounters later on I shifted my priorities to being able to carry some more ammo because to max out the sprint time to 10s and get the increased stamina recovery buff it was SO MUCH green gel that I decided not to and leave my sprint time at 8s cause it felt good enough. All these decisions you make ultimately cost you the green gel you get from exploring the environment or killing enemies the stronger the enemy the more gel you get but that will use up your resources to kill it.... everything ties together so seamlessly all the mechanics in this matter everything you do adds up to make an awesome truly survival focused experience.

Its stress inducing.

tbh it was actually pretty good w the horror

its really fun to see diifferent prespectives, for example i like re4 but i played only one time , the game is way to long for me, although i love watching videos of and about re4

She praised lots of parts of it, but just because you like the style and story, does not mean it is a well designed game.

The gameplay to me is mostly the problem. Too many hinderances for the sake of making it “difficult”. I also think the environments can be pretty bland at times, and the enemies are a bit to quick for how stiff your main character moves, which is the problem with resident evil 2 remake, which 3 makes up for it with the dodge. However, there are certainly good qualities that make it creative.

@@5000Seabass doesn't mean it's not to you. Who makes you the gatekeeper of a well designed game if he thinks it's was then it was if you don't the you don't tr

@@5000Seabass I liked the style and story as well as the games mechanics because it's a very well designed game objectively. This is a masterpiece it completely inspired the current new generation of survival horror while doing a ton of things actually better than both it's predecessors and successors.

My opinion is this: Survival Horror isn't a genre, it's a capcom marketing tool. I consider even the classic RE games to be action horror games. Even the newer fps ones, which take control away from the player far too often thereby negating one of the greatest strengths of being first person, have tried to entice the people back to RE who shunned it as being tooactiony with the words survival horror. Survival Horror is just a nonsense term they slapped on the back of the box, not a design ethos.

For it to be survival horror the player must be rewarded for avoiding combat and punished for engaging in it, for example RE4 is not survival horror because of the item drops, RE7 has no item drops so engaging in combat will cost you rather than reward you, also there must not be any areas where all enemies must be killed in order to clear the level other than boss fights of course, avoiding combat must always be an option, that's my honest opinion on the most important factor in defining something as survival horror

@@redplanet667 Good take👍

@@redplanet667 I hate when people use the higher difficulty settings as an argument the game is survival horror due to things like resource managing, if it was survival horror because of things like resource management it wouldn't be just in higher difficulties but actually always be of that genre. I think this confuses people to where they mistakenly think something now magically becomes survival horror based on the difficulty when it's just meant to be harder not meant to become a different genre.

Excellent comment, I agree with every single point you made here, and I also adore this game.

The second one was like a straight to VHS movie.

I really disagree, the first one to me felt way more generic and very dated, somehow feeling more outdated than re4.

@@CayeDaws The dated feeling was a deliberate design choice. You can find interviews where they (Tango) speak about how they tried to essentially make the game a tribute to classics survival horror in terms of mechanics and design.

@@jamess854 But it's nothing like classic survival horror. It references RE and RE4, but that's about it. Combat, setpieces, level design, it's all an action game disguised as survival horror. The last few levels play like Gears of War.

Yeah. I feel like people that love this game really fail to see the many flaws it has. Clunky gameplay, the storytelling is confusing just for the sake of being confusing, too many trial-and-error moments, questionable mechanics. This game has A LOT of charm, everything that Mikami touches has an undeniable charm, but I believe that most people that love TEW are not realistic

She shouldn't have. I'd rather watch somebody elses video about it who actually understand the game they had to PAY for without worrying it would ruin their brand. ☺️

@@tarkovsky97 lmao what in the world? This is probably the most in line with my opinion review I’ve heard on Evil Within. It was marketed as something it only pretended to be for maybe 10-15% of the playtime. There were a lot of good ideas and great designs, but it was horribly unpolished and uneven.

@@residentevilclone it literally isn't what? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 suzis worst review ever this is the reason i stopped following her opinion like a sheep, maybe you should too

pls watch some tew 1 speedruns and watch people playing it on highest difficulty and then come back and tell me the 2nd one has the better gameplay

@@paso6234 But I'm not a speedrunner even though I enjoy watching those.

Yeah, but Revelations 2 is also a PS Vita game (ported as is to other supports). Complaining that it has no dismemberment is like complaining a gameboy title has no 3D graphics : yeah, it's a valid criticism in a vacuum, but also understand it's not happening in any conceivable reality.

@@gryffehondor4236 I’d partially agree but I’m pretty confident Revelations 2 was ported from consoles to the Vita, not the other way around. Frima Studios developed the Vita port. Which means it was essentially developed as a console game first and the handheld port came second. Plus while I do agree that you shouldn’t expect next gen visuals on a handheld, I do think it is still completely fair to criticise a game for certain visual issues like a lack of feedback to damage even when taking into consideration weaker hardware such as that of a handheld. You can make a game with pixel art (e.g Hotline Miami) still feel more impactful than some big budget games with filters, effects (like shaking the screen) and animations.

resident evil is not dead space. dismemberment wasn't a part of it's formula

@@cappedminer369 The series definitely does have a history of limb destruction all the way back from the original game however, heck even in the first three you can blow up half of a zombie with explosives and they went through the effort of animating that instead of just having them fall down. While you are right about the fact that the gameplay was definitely not designed around the idea dismemberment, there are elements of it already there that can be used

Yeah I hated those Revelation games… absolutely overrated trash.

Wait what are we talking about the right one, Evil within 2 had a better story drama than the first one, sebastion has his daughter to save, while dealing enemies to protect her from psychos trying to use her, than we have is wife that has a very tragic ending. Then we have Kidman where we are able to understand what kind of person she is when you get closer to the ending. Especially the morbuis team that you meet, and Kidman partner. EW2 has better storyline, characters graphics, scares, enemies etc. They approve everything they got, but just sucks that they made only a quarter from the first one

@@diegosoriano2492 IMO the gameplay and graphics was much better in TEW2 but the story was just "I'm going to save my child" now in TEW1 I felt more intrigued.

@@diegosoriano2492 TEW2 story was just full of cliche. The Castellanos family consisted of tropes. The sad dad who doesn’t have personality, the mom who sacrifices herself for her family(the problematic representation of a woman character yeah), and the mcguffin daughter. It wasn’t impressive at all, it was just a lazy writing. Mobius members were all one-dimensional and all the antagonists lacked backstory. The “drama” was just a cheap melodrama that anyone can write in 5 minutes. TEW1 story wasn’t perfect but it was much much better than 2. Also Kidman’s character was developed very well in the first game DLCs. TEW2 didn’t have character development for any character.

@@playniohgames8635 Jesus H Christ, I seriously thought I was the only one who thought the story drama in the TEW2 is terribly weak sauce. The gameplay is "better", but it lacks so much soul artistically.

@@TheChriskilla100 I think most people think that the story in 2 is definitely weak. Seriously TEW2 had one of the most generic stories I’ve seen in video games.

Not really.

@@Andygb78 zzzzzzzzzzzzz

you clearly have no idea what survival horror is.

@@moonstruum327 ROTFL

​@@moonstruum327do you survive? Yes. Is it horror? Yes. Then, it is a survival horror game

Play Tormented Souls. That's the closest to RE1 we will ever get.

IMO a good fifty percent of TEW1 feels on par with the best of RE4, Dead Space or any other action/survival horror, another twenty percent was pretty okay to good and the last third (mostly action chapters in the second half) was just underwhelming. When it's good it's a nightmarish fever dream that you'll not easily forget and when it's bad it's definitely a nightmare you'll wish you could forget.

agreed.

Urah! 😁

ExactLy!

and I want to actually know what happens to Joseph I mean in the first game after you complete the Kidman dlcs it's implyed he's dead since Mobius agents just drag his limp body away but in the second it's revealed he's somehow still alive but you don't actually know what happens to him also the fact he's alive should be impossible considering Connolly and Dr hemenez went brain dead when they died in stem once but Joseph dies twice and still lives

I would like a 3rd game too but I think the 2nd had a good ending if they wanted to end the series there. 🤷🏻‍♂️

No, it’s not different strokes, it’s haters that hate on this have bad taste and being incapable of recognizing substance! I’m TIRED of everything being “opinion,” I truly believe there is such a thing as true classics otherwise no one will ever remember them in 10-20 years time!!! The fact that they’re remembered means something that people don’t wanna give credit to!!! I know the definition of greatness and this isn’t mere opinion, I understand the formula!!! And The Evil Within 1 HAS that formula!!! It excels in all the right ways while half assing in the less meaningful areas but people with bad taste naturally focus on those unimportant areas because their personality is an equivalent of that pretentiousness so they only seek what they already are and they LASER FOCUS on that overlooking and undervaluing THE ACTUAL IMPORTANT PARTS because that’s not who they are as a person!!! Like attracts like!!! I have no patience or mercy on haters of TRUE QUALITY!!!

@@user-qe7bt9dz1l ok grandpa let's get you to bed

@@user-qe7bt9dz1l c'mon grandpa, phaidon is right. It's time to take your pills

@@user-qe7bt9dz1l in my opinion the evil within is a good game but not a great game when it comes to incorporate survival horror elements. I think they totally destroyed this franchise in part 2 this franchise had the potential to be a good survival horror franchise.

Same I disagreed with a lot of her points in the video, such ammo, animations, and how certain enemies can one shot you if they land a certain hit and much more. I honestly loved when the game threw enemies that can one shot you, made it more stress inducing and fun.

RE5 is GOAT'd, nice try tho

And yet it's aged far worse than Re4 in less time.

RE5 coop is legendary

the disappoint in re5 directly contributed to me buying this game on xbox.

I think Resident Evil 5 hasn't aged that well, but damn if people didn't pull off incredible co-op combos in Mercenaries. I personally would have liked Chris and Sheva to have individual campaigns though, like Resident Evil 2.

Thanks god TEW2 doesn't have as many bullshit moments as this one with all those traps and chase sequences, hell they even let you run from enemies most of the time and let you heal using coffee machines in safehouses

Shes paid to be “the cynical rat”. A woman so tunnel visioned by the most overrated franchise she has to cry about everything she cant accomplish on the hardest diff or snag the nearest collectors

Agreed. Mikami really wanted to capitalize with a survival horror title with Bethesda and he did that with EW. The game has slowly become a classic; people forget that Resident Evil started off like that and slowly became popular. EW1 was definitely amazing in tone and atmosphere and while it can be tedious, it was an amazing experience for me. People praise RE4 so much and forget it too was tedious in parts and also inconsistent with its tone. Just like every game, there are going to be peaks and valleys, considering the length of games has increased.

the game was heavily criticised for technical issues at release. I think they were actually even worse on PC. I remember the Super Best Friends Let's Play had to move to PS4 part way through after experiencing a poor frame rate and 4 separate crashes on PC.

@@iMoD190 yeah I remember that

@@iMoD190 Really? My play through of TEW1 on pc I experienced none of these problems the game ran super smooth

@@athens9740 when did you do your playthrough?

@@CayeDaws About two months ago

To be fair though, yeah; The Executioner is kinda terrible.

To each their own, but the clunky and delayed controls and crappy linear story lowers the rating for me.

​@Sam Spade Whats wrong with its "crappy linear story". The story is one of the things the game is praised for. It's very interesting.

The whole sequel isn't like that though, its 2 parts but its not like some huge map where theres so much different stuff going on. You just have options to check a few buildings that offer a few quick side missions that offers more to the story and the chance to get items or weapons

The sequel sucks don't even bother. It's nothing like the first game and doesn't even continue the story from the first game

@@unshackledmind7863 pretty sure the sequel does continue the story line but in another approach, did you even read the document's in the first game and kidmin dlc? Though the second game does feel stiffy from seb running and walking is awkward and slow. But the open world is really fun and interesting yet scary

@@leonic458 I’ve played all the DLCs from the first game and the second one didn’t feel like a proper sequel at all, it was very disappointing.

Yeah don't bother it was so bad and they replaced Anson Mount which sucks

I think u have a different perception of survival horror

then why in the second game they had to bring back my man Sebastian while Kidman did nothing ?

@@carlosgarzon8900 Because spoiler alert Sebastian’s daughter, whose consciousness acted as the new stabilizing core for the new STEM system, and Sebastian’s wife, who acted as her caretaker while in stem, both went missing/offline while in stem so then Morbius (the evil organization Kidman works for) thought Sebastian would be the perfect candidate to enter their new STEM world, survive it’s corruption, and bring his daughter and wife back for them, and all because of his success at surviving the events of the first game’s STEM, that coupled with the fact that he would be highly motivated to succeed so that he could see his family again, especially his daughter who he thought was dead for years.

@@carlosgarzon8900 Because the core of the Stem is his daughter The company wanted the core to be retrieved and they didn't really think that bringing Kidman to do the job will bring the core to them, since they think she's pretty much a stranger for the core. They need someone that the core can trust, someone familiar, and that's where Sebastian came in. If the core is someone else, they probably would just ignore Sebastian

Because they probably would have been sued by Konami lol

Yeah it's totally why was the perfect person to take Ruvik down.

That’s nice, no one asked.

@@5000Seabass Having opinions is illegal, I forgot.

then you're either blind or incredibly lucky, because the game is a technical mess.

@@iMoD190 git gud

@@headcreeps7198 'git gud' at crashes, unstable frame rates, and texture pop-in?

No time for a smoke while dealing with demons😂😂