Novavax, Moderna, Pfizer Myocarditis Comparison - Updated
You have been asking for a comparison chart for these three vaccines. I have put together a few numbers, however, these aren't stratified and comparable to each other. Still, let's review these.
If you like this content and want more, I am doing a special lifetime membership offer. Click here:
www.drbeen.com/yt-special-p/
Want to support this work?:
Buy me a coffee :-) www.buymeacoffee.com/DrMobeen...
Become my patron: www.patreon.com/mobeensyed?fa...
PayPal: paypal.me/mobeensyed?locale.x...
My substack: mobeensyedmd.substack.com/
#drbeen #koolbeens #COVID
Disclaimer:
This video is not intended to provide assessment, diagnosis, treatment, or medical advice; it also does not constitute provision of healthcare services. The content provided in this video is for informational and educational purposes only.
Please consult with a physician or healthcare professional regarding any medical or mental health related diagnosis or treatment. No information in this video should ever be considered as a substitute for advice from a healthcare professional.
URL list from Thursday, Nov. 3 2022
Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021 | Vaccination | JAMA | JAMA Network
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
Interim Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of the Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine in Persons Aged ≥18 years - United States, July 2022 | MMWR
www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/71/w...
COVID-19 vaccine safety report - 20-10-2022 | Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA)
www.tga.gov.au/news/covid-19-...
Analysis of Thromboembolic and Thrombocytopenic Events After the AZD1222, BNT162b2, and MRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in 3 Nordic Countries | Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network
jamanetwork.com/journals/jama...
Novavax Patients Fact Sheet 10192022
www.fda.gov/media/159898/down...
FDA: Novavax COVID vaccine effective, but cardiac questions remain | CIDRAP
www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-persp...
Nuvaxovid | European Medicines Agency
www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicine...
Three cheers to anyone who admits getting something wrong these days. You're one in a million Doc!
Indeed. Demonstrates a strong moral compass, & high ethical standards
My new doctor that I will change ASAP asked me why I would not get the jab? I told him my personal experience was that my 19 yr old neighbor suffered myocarditis and had heart surgery and is permanently injured. 2) my 43 yr old friend died in his sleep after 1st booster. 3) my friends 53 yr old uncle died on the way home from his 2nd jab. Doc said; that’s not soo bad with all the lives being saved. (INSANITY) He said that he still fully endorses the jab although his daughter had suffered 30 days in the hospital after her inoculation. WTF?
Did you ask him if he gaslights all of his patients?🙄
After our doctor doomed her community with her vaccine push, she bailed. She quit her job and closed her practice. That says it all.
They're brainwashed
@@nobodymatters3294 my God
@@IndigoCosmic They all bought the Psyop,lock stock and barrel.
Did the Pfizer and Moderna include Pericarditis numbers as well? Seems strange to add pericarditis figures to Novavax but not to Pfizer or Moderna figures.
Typical!! Novavax has been treated like the red headed step child since day one. And the American taxpayer paid $61 billion for this vaccine. Nothing is fair.
Im wondering this too and shouldn't the numbers of age cohorts for pfizer be added so it's the 16 & over cases. Then i think Novavax is still a smidge better
@@PLeejo if you add the numbers you have to then divide by 300,000 so the result is the same basically but the way it is now show the higher rate for 16-17 year olds
The novavax trial only included myocarditis rates and the rate was three times higher
The biggest problem is that those who suffer harms are treated like pariahs, when they should be helped for as long as they're suffering.
What evidence do you have that this is occurring? The fact that anonymous posters on you tube claim something - doesn't make it so.
Great. Now lets include all the sudden adult death syndrome data so we can get an actual idea about how dangerous this all is.
Yes I agree. But I've heard they are not examining that? It's very scary how many young people are just dropping dead. I know a 40 year old woman that just dropped at work! 😥
@@vickieandjules137 many more to come
I really don't trust any covid vaccines.I am not trying to be rude and thank you for your conscientious information and continual studies. I do believe however that people should have the right to choose and shouldn't be ridiculed or persecuted for their choice when their intentions are good.
Yes And why are they still creating new Covid variants of this virus ? Or is it actually a man made parasite?
You forget, last year this time the unvaccinated was getting accused of being the problem. If people ain't got enough sense, to think that they can't live without a shot in their arm every so many months then there's something wrong with their choices.
@ Tim Little - neither do drug companies where there's no liability for their products.
As soon as they became mandated by governments, I knew something was wrong with these products.
The worst persecution came from family . One side of the family was so angry that my son 26 didn’t get the vaccine and didn’t inform them. He wasn’t hiding it but they felt he should have made an announcement.
This comparison is still flawed. First, as already mentioned cases of pericarditis from Pfizer and Moderna need to be included in a comparison with Novavax if we are including its cases of pericarditis. Second, Pfizer and Moderna data were 'after the second dose' whilst Novavax was 'per dose'. It seems then that Pfizer and Moderna data does not include cases after the first dose where Novavax does. Of course the exact wording from the studies needs to be carefully examined.
👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Dr Been got a big pfat pfaycheck
Also, how many people took Pfizer or Moderna as their first dose then took Novavax then blaming myocarditis from their first mRna shot on Novavax?
@@ruili96 Mixing and matching jab types was a fraud from the beginning. I bothered to read all the trial data for the main jabs used in the west and every one of them states they have no data on the safety or efficacy of mixing brands, yet government encouraged people to do this. It was the same with pregnancy. All reported having no data on safety or efficacy of jabs in pregnant women but government went ahead and encouraged it anyway.
I applaud your diligence, integrity and gifts for humanity.
Hey, remember when "the experts" said you could mix and match shots and boosters? LUDICROUS!!!
Probably because it confuses the case of liability. 🤔
Remember this everyone, CDC and FDA and TGA do NOT want you to take Novavax. I would just do the opposite of what they recommend, to be in the safe side.
These are the same organisations who banned ivermectin. So if they say Novavax is dangerous, it must mean Novavax is safe like ivermectin.
👍🏼😆
What about undetected or unreported cases of heart damage? What about time dependent damage that are ongoing? These studies are barely scratching the surface.
What about the more extensive and more common cases of cardiac injury from unvaccinated Covid-19?
Exactly, I personally believe the complete picture is alot more grim
@jamesmason2228 that's just a throw away to get you to take the vaccine.
That's assuming they're reporting the mRNA correctly.
I don't think comparing Pfizer/Moderna at 7 days is a great comparison to novavax as the mrna recipients have been shown to be producing spike protein for many months after vaccination, therefore I believe there would be myo/pericardis cases diagnosed well after the 7 days in this comparison. Novavax on the other hand gives you all the spike in 1 hit at the beginning and is not an ongoing process
good point
Also how many people who got myocarditis "from" Novavax took Pfizer as their first shot?
was thinking the same
I'm not sure this is correct if my own experience is anything to go by.
yes
Why compare one piece of garbage to another? Not as if I'd ever have anything to do with the sh!t. Just heard someone we know died shortly after the 8 mice booster...
Love your sense of humor Dr Been. 💜 Thank you for the update.
Per my understanding, in Australia & New Zealand the Novavax is offered as an 'alternative'. That is to say, offering it to people who may have concerns over the mRNA technology, or are allergic to certain ingredients in the mainstream (mRNA) vaccines. In that case, there would be situations that are not comparable. For example, a participant might have a 1st dose of Pfizer, then followed by 2nd dose of Novavax, etc. If such a participant eventually developed myocarditis, would the condition be related to the 1st dose, or the 2nd dose?
Exactly my point, we do not know if they ONLY took Novavax or not. I personally took Novavax for first and second dose. I measured by troponin and d dimer levels after both shots and EKG after second shot and all measures came back normal. So no myocarditis for me after Novavax
@@ruili96 I took J and J two years ago two doses had a lot of pain in my feet the first shot of Novavax yesterday some but not all the pain in the feet is gone but it is more tolerable truth but I did with the J and J had vitamin d deficiency truth
The truth is right in front of your eyes,I’ve lost 31 friends and acquaintances since inception,I’m sure they skew the reports
Is there any studies about Sinovac and Astraseneca Vaccines?
We still need data on longer term outcomes. NVAX appears to do more for reducing asymptomatic infection than mRNA vaccines and is more durable. There still may be some real advantages to Novavax but we need more data to be sure.
I wonder, in Australia, how many of those individuals vaccinated with the NovaVax had a previous dose of either Modern or Pfizer? I am wondering if it is purely unvaccinated for C19 and the NovaVax is the first time they have been exposed to a C19 vaccine OR are the 700k+ people prior vaccinated with Moderna or Pfizer. I feel like that could be incredibly helpful in understanding these cases of heart issues. I realize it shouldn't matter, but maybe in this vaccine it does. Maybe components of it aren't playing nicely with others. It would be an interesting thing to look into. My neighbor had Moderna the first two times. Her third boost was the Pfizer bc it was all that was on hand, she has had a solid lump in her arm and has been sick for 10 days now. She said she will go back to only Moderna. That got me thinking. It isn't something we have generally had issues with historically with our standard vaccines. But I wonder if these are somehow just different enough that they cause some level of cross issues. 🤔🤔🤔
I'm curious to know why there is ANY myocarditis from Novavax when it's a different (non mRNA) technology.
They are all full of graphene oxide
GREAT QUESTION... and I think someone answers below....ALL the Vax's have Graphene oxide IN them....causes inflammation of blood vessels...( probably other binders and crap we don't want IN our bodies!!)
@Asperobin robin Thank you good points on the dangers of "regular" flu vaccines...and the fact that this crap is being forced on population that doesn't really need it....( PS i had covid last december of 2021...lotta fatigue...no lung...used Ivermectin...helped immediately , also did antiviral herbs and plain old rest!!) Lost my "fear" of Covid...
I have a question about the spike used. So all these vaccines are creating a spike (in some way or another) and then the human body is encountering it. Given that Novavax does not seem to be able to avoid the peri-myo risk, the manufacturing method doesn't matter. So it must be the spike itself. So my question is, are all these vaccines creating a specific, same spike from the virus? And if yes, why? are there not other spike proteins on the virus that could be used as a template? perhaps ones not so high risk/toxic?
They don’t have to use the spike at all. Once your body recognizes a foreign invader it tries to fight against it - so other parts of the virus could have been used. When I asked why they used the spike when it’s so harmful someone in a comment thread claimed that yes, other parts of the virus could’ve been used but wouldn’t have been as effective. Who knows if that person knows what they’re talking about but the argument is seriously flawed. I’m also interested to know the difference between spike proteins used and if/how/why they’re manipulated. We know they’re damaging but let’s continue to pump them into people regularly?
The one interesting thing about novavax is you're technically getting a specific amount of premanufactured spike. With MRNA, the spikes are being manufactured in your body... How much is your body making? Who knows, might vary between person :/
Your body only makes about 10 % spike antibodies. the main antibody your body makes is the n protein antibodies
@@thedevilsadvocate5210 you need to give context with such a sentence. but besides that, i don't think anyone should be making claims about how much of x or y the body is making from an mRNA template. There is no way to track how much of the given protein/spike the mRNA causes the body to produce, or to which regions it makes its way. that's why, in my opinion, there is so much autoimmune issues with it compared to the old school vaccines, which they themselves still have risk, because can never be certain what MAY happen when you put the immune system under stress, but at least in those cases the quantity is finite and the dose can be varied.
@@ericaugust1501 this is if you get wild corona Your body only makes about 10% spike protein antibodies. 15% e - antibodies The body makes mostly 75% n - antibodies. The mRNA jab makes you produce only s- antibodies after your cells produce trillions of the spike proteins. The point I was trying to make is your body does not make so many spike protein antibodies. That could be part of the problem too many spike protein antibodies gumming up the works
Thank you Dr. Been. Are there any studies on myocarditis / Pericarditis following Sinopharm vaccine, Valneva or other Inactivated virus vaccines?
Appreciate the candor.💕
Now, we are only missing the data about how "strong" the dose actually was. Rumor has it that more than 90% of the doses were placebos or very low. That's why, the secret contracts forbid the monitoring of individual charges of the substance.
Pardon my skepticism..but I think Novavax has been scrutinized far more carefully in their clinical dara wheras multiple country meta-analysis w questionable reporting?
Thank you Dr.
Sweden have suspended Novavax for those under 30 as they are concerned about this.
Have you heard about or looked into the snake venom theory yet?? Seems like everyone is suffering from venom poisoning according to data recently uncovered.
I feel like this theory which was brought up by Dr. Ardis isn't viable. There may be some similarities between venom poisoning but overall the spike toxicity and perhaps autoimmune data is more compelling better explained and has more data to support it.
Update, i looked again at the data and Dr. Been please notice that the Novavax data includes 16 year old. If you look at the per dose data of Australia the rate of myocarditis is much lower than the phisfer data because you have to add 16-17 to the 18-24. That number is over 15 per 100,000. So isn’t Novavax a better vaccine with regard to just myocarditis ( since there was no data include for periocarditis for the mrna ones? Hope you see this comment , ty.
So what about Janssen in males?
I wonder what the stats on natural immunity is?
The use of Myocarditis figures for the mRNA vaxes and COMBINED Myocarditis and Pericarditis figures for Novavax and noting that Novavax has higher adverse events is a misuse of statistical comparators that I would not have expected in your usually carefully judged and reliable analyses. When comparing Myocarditis figures alone (which are available for all selected vaccines), Novavax, from the larger sample drawn from the Australian experience (compared to the smaller sample drawn from the Novavax company trials), has less Myocarditis (apples with apples) adverse events than the MRNA vaccines. Why have you not emphasised this point instead of emphasising the apples with pears comparison (Myocarditis numbers vs Myocarditis AND Pericarditis numbers). You acknowledge the apples vs pears comparison in today’s analysis but do not appropriately weight it’s significance. Why? Indeed, why?
My thought exactly, and thank you for articulating this point very concisely
Am I correct in thinking he is comparing Noavax australian study to USA Pfizer study? Is it safe to assume the USA studies were done much earlier and they weren't looking for myo and peri as hard... I remember in earlier days the myocarditis explanation was "debunked" as a "conspiracy" by the mainstream. @biltonbay, do you think the best comparison is Australian Novavax vs Australian Pfizer? In those studies, Nova still has less myo risk, right?
Because he was paid off. It really is that simple.
Excellent info, thankyou
First comment! Hey Dr. Been big fan!
Thank you 🙏
How is this still allowed into arms?
Something happened with my KZhead and I can’t find the links for the articles Dr. Been talks about. Can someone help me?
There’s a new tab called lives…. It’s under there now.
You have overlooked the issue sbout novavax. Many people had sometimes had a previous nrma vax and reacted badly to it. I met five of these when getting my shot, as they used novavax after experiencing bad side effects after using Nrma the first t. Once again data sometimes doesn't tell the correct story🤔
why is it that i can’t find the newest videos (only those from before 4 months) in Mobeens Video list? If i wouldn’t get the newest videos recommended in my main Y T page i wouldn’t be able to watch them,
I’m in Australia. I had my first nova at the end of Feb and my shoulder changed colour. A large purple patch. I think it’s capillary leakage but haven’t had it checked
When will you when its falls off?
Maybe it change in colour with every booster
Dr. Been, can you explain why the Novavax myocarditis data from Australia is so different than data from Taiwan and South Korea?
Because the Australian TGA is an inept and corrupt organisation. Remember, they WANT you to take mRNA. They don't want you to take Novavax. What all needs to be said?
Thank you for the sustained analysis of research on Covid-19 vaccines and the VARs. But I am curious why there is hardly any discussion on the vaccine adverse reactiond to the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine. In many countries like India, Oxford vaccine has been administered to most of the people who have taken it. Yet, much of the focus has been on the mRNA vaccines. Is it because of the novelty of the mRNA technology? Or, are there fewer and less severe VARs to the conventional virus technology in the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine?
I think the AZ vaccine is practically pulled from the market because of adverse effects.
can amyloidosis cause myocarditis/pericarditis? (does that make sense?) And how is amyloidosis diagnosed? Possibly by a simple blood test?
ok 😟 There is no specific blood test and results of investigations vary greatly from patient to patient. The diagnosis of amyloidosis starts when a doctor becomes suspicious of the patient's symptoms. A definitive diagnosis of amyloidosis can only be made through a biopsy.
A biopsy that shows amyloid deposits is the best confirmation of amyloidosis. The physician usually takes the tissue sample from abdominal fat or rectum. Sometimes, the tissue comes from damaged organs such as the liver, heart, kidney or intestines.
Any tissue where amyloid deposit can experience disruption.
Thanks again.
Hi.. Yr Topic interesting but u need end up with conclusion.. Tks.
Have you investigated the Glycocalyx and the lack of Mucosa lining damaged thus break down of the Endothelia cells and then you get trouble. By fixing this Glycocalyx you no longer have COVID.
Important =====> ======> In a statement today, Novavax said natural background levels of myocarditis are expected, with young males known to be at higher risk. It said the difference in the rates between the vaccine and placebo groups was very small (0.007 % and 0.005%, respectively) and that in post-crossover portions of the study, cases were within expected parameters. So far, clinical data covering 50,000 participants doesn't support a causal relationship, the company said, adding that it will continue to monitor all adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis.
Young getting Covid vax why?
Because of lack of brain 🧠🧠 of their parents.
This could not be a more apples to oranges comparison.
@DrBeen Medical Lectures You are an amazing educator!
Does anyone have a theory as to why? Seems counter intuitive.
Did Pfizer get to our good Doctor?
控えめに言って毒ですね
Always go for Pfizer vaccine
I had (forced by work) 2 novas. Each time on a Friday afternoon. Heart racing all weekend both times and within weeks of the 2nd I got covid first and only time. Lots of my friends are still unvaccinated. The ones that got covid were completely fine. What a messed up world
Consider yourself lucky, I lost two relatives and friend to Covid
No music this time :)
Just say NO synthetic drugs kids
?? So it’s not an MR a in novovax but still causes peri- myocarditis?
spike is the problem, in the disease and it is present in all of them
Yeessss!
Spike proteins cause it. They decided to use the dangerous part of the virus as the target. Trust the science!
So if you've had the virus you could have heart issues? Just great having avoided the jab thus far.
It still has the spike, I think.
I view your videos for a long time. This analysis is very biased. Apple to Apple please.
Its obvious none of these clot shots work.What a waste of time.
Always go with Pfizer vaccine
Stock price fell to $7.00