AMD Ryzen VS Intel for Video Editing - Which CPU is best for Premiere Pro & DaVinci Resolve?
Which CPU is better for video editing? Intel or AMD Ryzen in 2023/2024, let's find out!
Oct Sale Whokeys.com 25% Coupon Code: TN20
Windows 10 Pro OEM Key ($17): biitt.ly/tCRXT
Windows 11 Pro OEM Key($22): biitt.ly/gsyBS
Office 2019 Pro Plus key ($47): biitt.ly/CsUJp
Windows 10 +Office 2019 pack ($60):biitt.ly/6jg8Q
✅ Buy Intel 13th Gen here:
i5 13600k geni.us/i513600k
i7 13700k geni.us/i713700k
i9 13900k geni.us/i913900k
✅ Buy Ryzen 7000 here:
R5 7600x geni.us/7600x
R7 7700x geni.us/7700x
R9 7900x geni.us/7900x
R9 7950x geni.us/7950x
🟦 Intel testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/Z790ProArt [Asus Z790 ProArt Creator]
RAM: geni.us/h2EE [Kingston Fury Beast @5600MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/cnVpbO [Phanteks Glacier One 360MP]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/eRVfwYj [Samsung 980 Pro 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/y75Sg [Samsung 980 Pro 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/qs5Asp6 [Deepcool PQ1000m]
GPU: geni.us/tuf3090 [Asus TUF RTX3090]
🟥 Ryzen 7000 Testbench:
Motherboard: geni.us/x670eProArt [ASUS X670e ProArt]
RAM: geni.us/h2EE [Kingston Fury Beast @5200MT/s]
Cooler: geni.us/StrixLCII360 [ROG Strix LC ii 360]
Cooler Fans: geni.us/cRsu3 [Phanteks T30]
OS SSD: geni.us/Hmf9MA [Teamgroup Cardea C440 1TB]
Project Drive: geni.us/2TBm480 [MSI m480 Spatium 2TB]
PSU: geni.us/yZC1Nk [Corsair hx1000]
GPU: geni.us/tuf3090 [Asus TUF RTX3090]
👇❗️PC Builds for Creators [Latest]❗️👇
➡️ $750 BB4B (Best-Bang-For-Buck) PC geni.us/750-1300BB4B
➡️ $1500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/1500-2300BB4B
➡️ $2500 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/2500-3500BB4B
➡️ $4000 BB4B Creator PC geni.us/4000-5kBB4B
Want me to check out some tech or interested in collaborating?
📩 email me: thetechnotice@gmail.com
✅ LATEST TN MERCH HERE: www.technoticestore.com
FB: / thetechnotice
IG: @thetechnotice
#creators #AMDvsIntel #videoediting
Video produced by Lauri Pesur
Edited by Sam Ruddick
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GEAR USED IN THIS VIDEO:
[All 'geni.us' links below redirect to Amazon (or some other Online stores) and may earn commissions]
AUDIO:
-The Recorder + Mic I Use: geni.us/tscmdr-10l
-Shotgun Mic I Use: geni.us/T35T
-My Main Headphones [CHEAP]: geni.us/dzv7Q
-My Main Headphones 2.0 [NOT CHEAP]: geni.us/as7q9v
VIDEO:
-A-roll Camera: geni.us/NvnoA
-Lens for A cam: geni.us/J009I
-B-Roll Camera: geni.us/wVlF8J
-Top Down Cam: geni.us/56576C
-Main Bokeh Lens 4 Sony: geni.us/k09oA
-The Wide Angle beast w OS: geni.us/9KfCwy
LIGHTS:
-Main Fill Light: geni.us/qTbE
-Hair & RGB Lights I use: geni.us/TdY1
-RGB Tube Wall Light Behind me: geni.us/96gWdz8
-The Fire effect light: geni.us/GX5KA
OTHER:
- Favourite camera Monitor w LUT: geni.us/tecUD
- Music Licences:
▶Get 2 Months for FREE when joining Artlist/Artgrid below◀
Music & SFX Licensing Site: geni.us/TNartlist
Stock Footage Site: geni.us/TNartgrid
DISCLAIMER: I have to state that some of the links on this channel are affiliate links which means by clicking on them and purchasing the items I get a small commission. I'm part of an Amazon Affiliate and earn revenue from qualifying purchases. Using the provided links does NOT change the price for you.
⏲️
0:00 Intro
0:33 Sponsored Segment
0:57 Testing Method & parts
2:10 RAM Speed difference & WHY?!
4:42 Testbench
4:59 DaVinci Resolve: Extended overall Score
6:54 Standard Overall Score
7:53 4k Media Score
8:42 8k Media Score
9:49 GPU Effects & Fusion Score
10:27 Premiere Pro & iGPU
11:35 Extended Overall Score
12:45 Standard Overall Score
14:03 Different Codecs
14:20 Long GOP [EXT + STD]
14:42 Intraframe [EXT + STD]
15:16 RAW [EXT + STD]
16:20 Conclusion: AMD Ryzen or Intel?
17:03 ALL CPUs & More Softwares
17:43 Best Bang for Buck PC for creators?
I asked about this comparison in your last live stream . Tnks for this video
your videos are both very helpful and fun to watch! I've learned so much about hardware and editing from you
Awesome, thank you!
Thank you, but could you also do a video with both systems with souped up RAM, because that's how most users will be running it. Thank you.
What about a video on dual 4090 builds for Redshift/Octane? What Mobos and Cases can fit it? What are the temperatures of the upper card when they run almost glued together? Caveats of PCI speeds and lanes. And most important (for me): Is it possible to have two suprim liquid x 4090s on a Fractal North build?
Love it, best timing for this video. Not seen you in a while! Every month or so you re-engage my interest with one of these things :) Great work again.
Welcome back! What are some of your favourite topics/videos on the channel? :)
Well since I am using movie Maker HD and my old Zen2 rig, basic creator kit - I always come back here before I buy something. January is the planned upgrade time, so really anything that's going to help me make a better decision is a must-watch at the moment. I had a far more humble start than you did, but my ambitions are probably just as wide - but I have a far stricter budget lol. I think it's unlikely I will spend more than £2k on the entire setup, monitor and computer. That means unless I am getting a great deal on a GPU, it will be whichever one gives me the editing grunt that I will need at the lowest reasonable price. It's the least likely part to get an upgrade in future! But aside from those things which you already do quite often, certainly as often as I require - additional things you could do that I would like : - Spy and virus guards which are good with the least performance hit (I never get to disable mine not even for a day). - Best ways or methods to have a main rig for editing and recording, and maybe 3 or 4 other HDMI devices along with a big screen and 3 smaller ones. What is the optimal way to organise and run all that stuff together? I have a terrible time with that. I have so many extra cables and box switches and stuff, and it's still not ideal or even near to! it is functional lol. I bet you could do a far far better job, in fact if you did a long video that 100% solved this problem I would go and spend £30-40 in your store or Patreon just for that one thing! Only since it is you doing it though, don't farm it out to somebody else lol I was stung by that once with LTT. Or should I say ETT.@@theTechNotice
I love your videos, it was very helpful this year as I had a new system put together and went with the 13700K and 64gb Ram and a RTX 4070 and the system is ridiculously fast and doesn't miss a beat whatever is thrown at it. I decided to spend a bit more and added a second screen and it;s amazing how much time I save now in my editing.
Same, has 13700K and 7800XT. 😊
Oh im Building thinking to Go for 17 14th Gen But confused about GPU@@blaze26700
I am plaining to get an i7 13700k and 7800xt should go for it or instead consider a rtx 4070?@@blaze26700
@@blaze26700and how much did you pay for your 7800xt?
Are you having air cooling or AIO? And what monitors are you using? 4K?
Just gave the 1000th like - so satisfying. Thanks this is super helpful!
Great video! Glad you labeled it specifically for video editing. If I’m not mistaken, that mobo has a noise canceling feature. It would be interesting to see a video comparing its noise canceling vs nvidia or AMDs.
They all suck and should not be used in anything production worthy. I have tried the amd and nvidia ones and they are both quite aggressive 😅
@@JoseMariArceta ya, but which one sucks the least and why?
@@_B.C_ I tried the first driver amd shipped with the noise cancelation feature and it works but leaves a light hissing sound, not sure if this was patched up. The nvidia one works fine. The asus software is probably similar to another cpu based noise isolation software called Krisp voice (the same stuff embedded in discord for noise isolation).
Thanks for the video. It would have been great if you could have thrown in the details for power consumption and heat management for those CPU's and show the stats. Thanks like your content.
I've actually done that in a different video if you'd like to check that out. Search for power consumption AMD vs Intel :)
Alright thanks for letting me know will check it out, keep up the great work.@@theTechNotice
Adding After Effects can make this video complete! But thanks for this one! 💯
Enjoyed! I have the ProArt motherboard for my 7950X CPU and a mid-tear video card. I am a DR user. I will wait for the next gen to upgrade my video card. The 10G connection to my NAS is a crucial feature.
Agree!
okay now make a video with 7950x, 4090, and ARC gpu in second slot to see if ARC card will be recognized or utilized for anything in premiere/davinci
Dual A770 16gb after that please. 😂
Hey this is thr fjrst time ive seen a post like yhism.. does that mean the arc gpu will work the same way as intel igpu??
@@Immortal__ There are claims by Intel that ARC and the integrated graphics can work together from when it was introduced but from what I know (which is very little honestly as I have never touched an ARC gpu) it hasn't worked how they've claimed. But all that information is before recent updates.
That would be an interesting pair of tests to compare this data to.
Is Sony vegas no longer a thing
Any idea on how the 3d v cache cpu (like the 7800x3d) perform in production benchmark ( photoshop, resolve ... not 3d) ? Can those programs benefit from the cache like games ?
It would have been perhaps better to test with 4 sticks and the speeds where that is stable at. A highend system would often like to have more memory.
thanks! if I can't afford any dedicate GPU, should I go for Intel or AMD, I guess Intel due to the better codec support right? But the AMD 780U actually has better Gaming performance, do you have any test on that? Coz there are more people starting to use handheld PC / Ultraportable Laptop for video editing in dock mode. I wonder how amd 7840U + 780m iGPU vs Intel 13900H + Iris Graphics
Please do test with real world footage(4k,6k,long gop, A intra etc) , and compare that with benchmark scores
I'm using Davinci Resolve, went from 5900X to 7600 because I went with DR Studio so work is done through GPU. A friend informed me that Intel with iGPU actually works better in Davinci Resolve for scrubbing through DR timeline (I'm doing 4K reso). Current I'm not facing any lag or lack, just wondering if it's worth me spending a good load of money just for a new board, go with Core i3-12100 (the only one I have with iGPU, not using CPU cores much). Would appreciate if could get some opinion from you. TIA.
I would say it's not worth it right now for you to spend money to completely switch platforms. Wait until you need to upgrade, then switch over to Intel. At least wait until Zen 5 comes out to see if it might actually utilize the iGPU at all. Intel's next gen will be Arrow Lake in 2025. That might be a good time to upgrade and switch over.
@@squatch545 thanks man, the thing is .... I don't actually have to spend to switch platform, at least if I do it won't be much. I have all the platforms and systems configurable, just wondering if it's worth the hassle. Currently only AM5 RDNA2 for my work and felt no lack.
@@goldfries I don't understand. Why did you ask, "just wondering if it's worth me spending a good load of money just for a new board," ?
@@squatch545 yeah forgot the description I used in a 10 day old comment. What I meant that time, was only for the motherboard. An ITX B660 board with DDR5 from Asus costs quite a bit as a board itself. But my response to you just now was because you mentioned (to what I understand) as an overall platform. Pardon me for any confusion. Really appreciate your comment.
Hate to resurrect this video, but is there a GPU video for Premiere Pro & DaVinci Resolve? I'm debating the 7900xt and 4070 ti super.
I plan on doing an I9 12900k setup. It will be a slow build and a dedicated gpu will be last. I am currently using the an I9 9900k with a RTX 3060 for Sony Vegas. It does quite well as I use it for both gaming and editing.
I was actually expecting the power usage, but thanks for this info. Please do this again when 14th gen comes out. Thanks mate
you Might wanna check out this video: kzhead.info/sun/fayQqKWcgn1qi58/bejne.html&ab_channel=TechNotice
@@theTechNoticeim also waiting for your intel 14th gen reviews, especially of the 14700K
@@theTechNotice yah i have seen this video before. And for the past 5 months I had also seen a lot of videos how the amd high power usage during idle can be fixed. Please include power usage again for your 14th gen review.
was looking at buying an intel i7 12700kf, I'm assuming it falls in-between the i7 13700k and Ryzen 9 7950x ? maybe a little lower than the Ryzen ? was just curious with your opinion on it. looking to use it for premiere pro
Another great video. Man, these must be a lot of work! I have a high end PC with the 13900K and a 4090. It does very well in Resolve. Especially when adding Noise Reduction or certain effects. However, when it comes to smooth Timeline performance and overall fluidity in editing, I gravitate to my M1 Ultra Studio. It just slices through all footage better. It’s a better editing experience. Especially with 10 bit 4.2.2. Footage. The Intel does do a good job with that footage, but the M1 is simply faster and smoother with it.
I've got to revisit the Mac Studios! What monitor are you using for the M1 Ultra?
I use a 5k by 2k LG monitor. For both. I switch between Thunderbolt and Display Port. I know that the M2 Ultra Studio literally runs strong noise reduction effects in 4k and can do about 30fps while editing. Pretty impressive. @@theTechNotice
The reason I asked about the monitors is because of Apple scaling 'issues'. Not sure if you saw my M1 Ultra long term review? :) You've done right and went with the 5k resolution monitor. If I wanted to switch to mac studio, I'd have to replace my monitors... which really annoys me!
Hello, how well it runs adobe premiere and adobe after effects at the same time ?
For overall video editing, Intel Quick Sync is a real game changer. A couple of months ago, I switched my main PC from a 5800X to a 13700K, and every issue I had with AMD has disappeared with Intel. Overall, everything feels smoother and snappier. Even when using a dedicated GPU, exporting directly with Quick Sync usually works faster and better than with a dedicated flagship GPU.
Interestingly, I also have a Mac M2, which works wonders for video editing, and its overall performance is on par with something like the 13700K
It's comments like this that makes me feel like changing. Even if it's from AMD Ryzen 5 7600 to Intel Core i3-12100 for the iGPU usage.
@@goldfries Or (and I actually have no ide if this would be a viable option) you could get an A380 and maybe you can run quicksync through that? Again, I do not know if this is possible, but it might be worth looking into it since it should be the cheaper/easier (solution)
you know that quick sync ruins the quality of the video right ?
@@georgitodorov4048 I honestly can not tell the difference between nvidia nvenc h265 and intel quicksync h265 at 4k 16Mbps (and even amd vce h265), though it might just be me
Love the video man! Ryzen 7000 and intel 13th are absolutely amazing. I can definitely back that intel hits higher numbers for performance in most scenarios compared to 7000. Only reason i went with ryzen though is mainly the power draw. Intel cpus suck down quite a bit more than the ryzen and since the performance is fairly small and probably not noticable in every day task, i went with 7950x back in December and dont regret it one bit.
I heard the power draw average is in favor of Intel. Amd use more power at idle and in games the power is the same. It is at rendering that the power draw is higher. And we are talking of no more than a bulb consumption difference. My issue is more the temp of both Intel and new amd cpu. Undervolting is necessary and i don’t know the impact on long term. Intel has better memory controller and no cpu burning like amd. I wait to see ryzen 8000 and intel 15900k. By the meantime i will simply upgrade to 5950x or 5900x
Trust me not a big difference because Intel is the most efficient when not gaming or only background task can go down to just 15watt but my brothers Ryzen was still pulling around 70-90watt not sure why they are designed like this idle power consumption is not as good as Intel
@@CC-gt3ro Not that is means much, but I did run a 7700k for 5y, was constantly hitting 100°C and thermal throttling (problem with the cooler but I never changed it), it is still working well in my second build and surprisingly enough it still can hold the 5ghz profile I created in 2017 (with same voltage). I believe there was a slight chip degradation since the 5.1ghz profile isn't stable anymore, but if you ask me it is still mighty impressive. Adding to this I think Intel stated that they expect their chips to be "fine" at running at TJ max. Therefore in general I would not worry too much about temperatures
I just want to point out that intel cpus seam to have a much lower idle power draw than AMD multi-chiplets cpus, thus depending on the use case intel might come out as the higher efficiency option. (Tech Notice himself did a pool a while back asking AMD users what was the idle power draw of their cpu and there are other reports around about this)
@@mastroitek I noticed this as well after posting cause it seems like in my use case my AMD CPU for some reason enjoys to sip on power. Idle wattage without anything running in the background is only around 20-25w, 30-35w when using browser, and 70-90w maximum when I game. I didn't realize normal wattage pull for 7950x was closer to 40w idle and a bit higher for other use cases
Can you test next After Effects, Fusion, Autodesk Maya/Max with intel vs AMD cpus
What camera do you use to shoot your videos? Or do you use an iPhone?
What would be the best gpu/cpu combo for Ableton and Davinci for a 1k pc?
Could you test the new a580 by Intel and compare it to the older a380?
@theTechNotice can you do a video for budget photo editing pc whc mostly works withe Adobe Lightroom CC and Adobe Photoshop as well.... Thanks In Advance
Did i miss power consumption in test somewhere?
⚠️ How well these systems run adobe premiere pro and adobe after effects at the same time using complex projects, transferring media one from another ? Did you made this test ? Does anybody knows ? I intend to do an upgrade on my machine to another editing one, but I'm still deciding about amd Ryzen 7950x and Intel 13900k for both intense adobe premiere pro and after effects. Thanks. 🎉🎉❤
I just wanna say thank you for covering the Creators needs when it comes to hardware benchmark !!!!! , If there is a possibility compare the last gen Ryzen Cpus plss.
There is one out there. Search, "Tech Notice 12th gen vs ryzen 5000" :)
uhhh didn't see it :"""""") thanksssss!!@@theTechNotice
does the AMD has new decoding for the 8k 10bit 422? I was considering get intel because of the quick sync. My current amd Can't run davinci 8k 10bit 422 , I get like 5 fps while 420 I can get around 20ish
Any chance we can see real-world identical tasks comparison as oppose to the benchmarks? Or would that not provide any additional relevant results?
I'd recommend looking into Pugetbench and how they test the hardware, because that's as close as you can get to 'real-world' identical tasks without adding user error into the equation.
Can you make a video about the AI on the Lightroom , i have a Ryzen 5700G and its takes some time until it detects or make some changes. it is CPU or GPU accelerated ? I dont have a GPU, i run only iGPU
Great timing, I am now planning to upgrade next year after a devastating crash that corrupt my project file that made me redo all my work Might go for intel, much cheaper because of ddr4, gives more time to save for ddr5 Do Photoshop Next
Iam aware intel 14th gen is around the corner but im not aware of any upcoming amd CPU release. Do you know anything about ryzen 8000?
where is the smooth playback comparison on igpu? hope to see it soon =)
Please run them on ram speeds that works best for them. Most people probably won't run their 6400 kit at 5200. Could also show the difficulties running it at higher speeds if there are any.
Wait for the 14900k review :)
Coincidentally I was already saving up and planning a January upgrade - a new rig to sit alongside this one. Could not have timed this video, and also this comment any better :) I will definitely be looking to run my memory at the fastest stable speed. For the first time in a decade I probably gonna go with blue team.@@theTechNotice
I wana selct between a laptop ryzen 7640hs or 7840hs for gaming and some 3d animation tasks with unity will I loose a lot of performance with the ryzen 7640hs over 7840
Super helpful video!
would you please try something like 7840hs vs 13700h， both iGPU only.
One thing I'm wondering about when comparing Intel to AMD is how much cooling do you need? Apparently ryzen 7000 series are designed to run hot and I don't know if this is just AMD making excuses or whether the CPU actually performs better at 95C compared to running a custom loop capable of lowering the temperature. Can a 360 aio cool a 13900k so it won't throttle for video editing? I know sometimes the tests used to test these CPUs push them beyond what regular workload will ever ask of the CPU. Is the cooling required the same between the 7950x and 13900k? Sorry if you have already covered these questions in a previous video. I'm still pretty new to your content.
According to my studio editors Intel really is made for that... They have zero issues As for me as a 3D Artist there's literally none 😭
What do you mean? :)
@@theTechNotice in my workplace the editors who work in Adobe line of products or Da Vinci prefer Intel CPUs And as for us 3D artists We can't say , even Xeon is falling short😅
helped a lot, thanks
Thank you for this review, I personally went with Intel despite people saying to get AMD for performance. Not a single regret. Intel is fast enough for gaming and definitely faster for video editing!
Please cover adobe after effects and media enconder
Looks like their close enough to not really even matter unless perhaps you’re working on very tight deadlines.
for the laptop video editing workstation which one platform should i go please suggest is macbook pro 14 or any windows laptop i am extreamly uses photoshop and premiere pro and after effects
MBP!
@@theTechNotice thank you so much for the replay and suggestions sir I am big fan from India
*Please test also for Photoshop. Which is the better CPU and memory amount!*
Depends on which program you're using. Clipchamp? Hang it up. Either processor will do great with adequate ram and a decent gpu (whatever the gpu has to do with it) unless either of these are APUs. I dunno. Cant afford that type of thing wot with all the inflation going on in my head. How fast is editing on a pentium or athlon using Windows Movie Maker?
I can't understand how you still haven't hit a million subscribers? The numbers on YT are definitely not based upon overall quality. If they were, you would never have left the top three most visited channels. Mystifying algorithm.
Why didn't you include the Ryzen 9 7950x3d or the 14th gen intel CPU's?
Did you ever do the non-X series of CPU comparison?
Yeah this would be very interesting. I have the most entry level Ryzen 9, the 7900, and it'd be super interesting to see more of the ryzen 7000 non-x CPU benchmarks.
if you ran PBO on the non 'x' Benchmarks, it would become an 'x' variant basically :)
Is a I5 12600kf for 150€ or a 12600k worth it for Davinci and Ableton?
intel is on sale right now, I was thinking of picking up the 13700k, but I think I am going to wait a little bit longer since raptor lake refresh is 3 days away.
The big jump for Intel will be arrow lake with the 15900k. I have the feeling this processor will be a beast with 40 cores and probably 4/5 nm chip. For Intel it will be a big jump. On the 14th only the 14700k seems good with more e-cores. For Amd i would pass on the first gen am5 zen 4 and wait zen 5 or zen 6
Need a video about pro art monitors
P-core and E-core are Intel terms just like hyper-threading. AMD only has cores and SMT. I understand your reasons for your RAM speed selection but doesn't really make sense as the comparison is biased. To be consistent you should have disabled boosting on both CPUs as there specified rated TDP are going to be out of spec otherwise. As far the memory controllers being weaker or better, that could be true but not necessarily accurate and AMD's chiplet design and infinity fabric wouldn't necessarily perform any better if it's IMC was "stronger" or "better". AMD released a new AGESA that improved DDR5 speed on AM5 to DDR5-8000 MT/s, does change the chips engineering but doesn't it make the previously weak IMC "stronger". If you used had locked the base frequencies for both then the extra power requirements for Intel wouldn't have been an issue.
I thought about that, but not sure if you've looked into 4 stick EXPO on Ryzen 7000 or higher capacity RAM (64GB+) EXPO stability? As creators we need more than just 32GB and at higher capacities Intel does do a better just at the moment, which should be reflected in the benchmarks. If I used 6000mts 32GB on both platforms, I'd actually bottleneck the benchmarks by the RAM capacity which would skew the results even more. The reason I'm leaving the power limits open is not because I've opened them, it's because most* motherboards have set the MCE or equivalent ON by default (whether this should be on is another conversation) and I believe most people will use the motherboard like that. Hope this clarifies this abit.
@@theTechNotice AM5 does have limitations on 4 sticks, so most people needing 64 GB will use 2 32 GB sticks. And most users will enable XMP/EXPO. I would even go so far as saying they would put some effort in basic memory tuning. I don't expect you to do that when benchmarking. Since you use primarily Intel terminology I assume you are more comfortable in that environment. But if you are going to allow any amount of power on an Intel platform you should at least use the optimum 6000 MT/s with 2 x 32 GB for the AMD system. They are both sanctioned overclocking. I'm of the mind it's wilful bias because no one would do what you are doing and then claiming that one system is better than the other.
Please make something for after effects and blender/ 3D softwares. Which cpu will be better ?
have a look at my 'i tested all the cpus for creators' video :)
I don't know why but I wanted the AMDs to do better. Either way by the time I finally get to upgrade, you'll have a video for the 14900 vs 8950 video out. Whatever I end up choosing then, will get de-lidded and a custom loop to cool it. 20 degree Celsius drop in temps under load on the 7950 de-lidded.
Because AMD is the reason Intel has to make better chips. If it were not for AMD, intel would be selling it's Raptor Lake chips for twice the price they are now.
@@humansvd3269 mmm aside from that. Best analogy I can think of is cheering for your home team. With the road map of when I can actually upgrade I will probably still go with the 8950X. I wanna say 'to support the underdog' but overall AMD is killing Intel in the high priced server market and AI sectors. I should also mention that anything current or upcoming is going to feel like heaven coming from my aging 7820X on the X299 platform.
For encoding Films what is the best for speed ansd win Time
Why didn't you talk about the quicksync in Davinci Resolve? When you compared AMD and Intel with Davinci 2 years ago, you talked about the quicksync a lot and you recommended the Intel for Davinci resolve. What is the difference now?
as a person who doesn't care about Puget tests and prefer more personal use experience can you please do more of that kind of review or add it to all these tests
just use media encoder and render / prep all your assets prior to editing. It will make everything feel alot faster and efficiently.
I kinda wonder how a 13500 would perform. I bet it'd do really well relative to its price - it's still a 14-core i5, albeit with that 6/8 split.
same me: I've been following that CPU for a couple of months now. Everyone saying it's great for editing/rendering but I didn't find good comparisons with these CPUs
Don't use either, use Sony Vegas or Sony Movie Studio. Hail to the kings, baby. I don't even know why you'd spend a fortune on a video editing rig, and then use free junk like Resolve. Spend a bit of cash on your video editor. On the other hand, I don't know why you'd spend a fortune on Premiere Pro. Seems like the opposite end of the spectrum... too much. Sony Vegas dominates the nice middle ground, and it's got this luscious multirack editor. I went with the 7950x. It gets the job done. Limit it to 80C and/or 140w in BIOS and it runs sweet, 7% lower Passmark than balls to the wall cooking and I'm fine with that. Once you go over 2 sticks of RAM, your speed is going to drop down to 3800mghz. Having 128gb is sweet. Now I want 192gb... What I was surprised at was how much my editor uses the GPU 3D engine and no so much the encode and decode engines... which it's not maxing out. All those little Nvidia cores though it makes big time use of them to render transitions and effects.
Test lower end Video Editors in the $100 to $200 range. Most of us just need basic or mid level editing.
That would be Resolve
This was very helpful. It seems nearly impossible for me to find information from a creators first perspective instead of gaming benchmarks. I don't even play fortnight. More like this please.
Why are you don't do export video time To know who faster..
I think you've handicapped the 7950x by lowering the ram timings.
*speed not timings. Timings were the same :)
It comes out of the factory handicapped :)
Why not test the Threadrippers?
Whait for 15th gen or buy 14th gen intel for video editing?
Bro for video editing which one is best i7 or ryzen 7? And also I'm Going for asus anyone please give any suggestion!
So nice this work you are purchasing. Each Time I am so grateful. So much Thx for your work! And your style.
Glad you enjoy it!
Would you be able to update the intel RAM link? It is a duplicate of the Motherboard link
Thank you for this, updated now!
@@theTechNotice You're a gentleman and a scholar.
A low budget comparison would’ve been more practical for most users. 5600G 12600K 12400K 12100 This price range is relevant I think for most people.
why dony you under clock the RAM for intel at 5200 Mhz to match both ...400mhz is big difference to change the benchmark results...set both to euals frequency and check again
still gonna pick Ryzen for cooling stabilities
Bro AMD is the future 😉
Just bought a pc from an m1 pro MacBook and i think im definitely going back to mac where stuff just works! It’s not like im a developer i just want a snappy machine period!
What about Intel now? Should this video have an update?
Intel 13 gen has improved a lot and thanks to Microsoft and Intel always working together 😊
improved a lot and still 10nm 😂😂😂😂
Did you not know that AMD get the same amout of frequnecy as intel? 8000MT+ on 48GB? Also hardcore overclokers say AMD controller is more stable at higher MT
Yesterday I ordered Ryzen 9 7900x over Ryzen 5 7600x. It means I wasted my money ?
wut do u think would b the best computer at around $400
I am not the guy you asked, but I think I can still help you a little bit. I can't include the link without it getting snipped, but I managed to get a AMD 5600G with integrated graphics (125) cooled with EKL Ben Nelvis cooler (25) and 16GB of Kingston Fury Beast DDR4-3600 (50) on an MSI MPG B550 board (120), housed in a NZXT H5 Elite (110) and powered by a non modular 400 Watt BeQuiet PSU (60) with a gold rating for just under 500€ total in Europe. Add in a cheap M.2 for about 40 Euros and you'd have yourself a PC for about 500. I'd say you can get pretty much the same maybe with a different cooler and PSU for about 450 dollars in the US, because most parts are slightly cheaper in dollars, so maybe you can even get a 2TB M.2 with that and stay just under 500. You would have to get a real GPU later and don't try encoding video or playing games in 4k or hell even any newer 3D games on that. As a creator save up for an Intel ARC 750 GPU for about 200 bucks and double the ram for another 50. If you manage to get a 650 Watt PSU for not much more than the 400 gold and you will definitely step up later, then obviously buy that right away. Let's say you get one for 80. So that adds 330 to the tab. Then you will be at around 830, which gets you a good PC that looks really nice and performs better than what 90% of the people have. It's not going to be a 2023 high end machine, but it will look great, allow you to do video editing and be okay even in games, especially if you aren't trying to game on a 4k monitor. Once you have a little bit more money you will want to step up to the GTX 4070 most likely, unless all you do is like photoshop and premier pro. But you will need more CPU power to max out what that card can do. On the other hand if you don't do creative work and you will only game in 1080p, maybe a GTX4060 and 550 Watt PSU is enough for you, which won't require more than 5600G as a processor to be honest. But if you want to max out the 4070 and do quite a bit of video editing and gaming with that PC eventually, you would be looking at a 5800X3D as an upgrade. If you want to do work only and mostly video work, the the 5950X is still not too bad of an upgrade path. As for Intel Asrock's cheapest 760 Lightning mainboard will give you DDR5 for 120ish. A 12700K which is the cheapest option with 8 fast cores is still almost 300 though. You could also go 14600K for more slower cores and less faster ones and about the same overall speed for about the same overall price. Then you'll need 32 GB of DDR5, which will run you at least 100, probably closer to 120. A very good M.2 with 2TB can be had for about 90. You'll need 100 Watts more for Intel these days and this is a much faster CPU than the AMD from above, so you are in the 850W range, where the good ones cost you 150. That's 120 + 300 + 120 + 90 + 150 = 780. Still need the case and air cooler which adds another 150 or so (can be more if you step up the cooler, which you might have to), unless you buy something pretty ugly. So that's 830 and over double the budget and also doesn't include a discret GPU. In fact the AMD will have better 3D power, because their integrated graphics are better. But then again the Intel K variants give you Quicksync and more, which can be a much bigger deal as a creator than whether you can get 26 or 14 frames in a new title on low settings. The above 500 dollar AMD build gets you some Blizzard arcade games, some shooters on super low settings or oldschool games in 1080p, stutter free youtube and will feel quite snappy until you try to use lightroom, photoshop or video editing without proxy files. After you upgrade that with the Intel ARC for 220ish, you will be fine doing most things and can even game a little. Check the 750 benchmarks to see what exactly would work. But then the upgrade path on AM4 isn't there. You can step up one time to a 5950X or 5800X3D and get within about 20-30% of todays highend builds. It will be enough to power anything south of a 4070ti as well, but you will need a new PSU to power those cards. On the Intel build you are within 15% of today's best PCs for most things and maybe you won't bottleneck a 4080 much. You can probably sell that Intel PC better than the AMD one, too. It will suck a lot more watts from the plug though. You can upgrade it all the way to a 14900k and 4090, but I probably wouldn't do that with that board. Intel is basically buy use for 3 years sell. AMD with AM4 is the cheapest path to a fast PC right now, but AM5 will have a longer lifespan. You can get a 7800X3D now and later on maybe get a 8950X3D or maybe even a 9959X3D if that will be a thing. AM5 will be here for a while most likely. So an AM5 mainboard will be upgradeable and then you usually sell that kind of system when the new socket has been adopted for a year or two at a fraction of the cost of new parts. That's why most PC youtube videos are centered around the Intel 1700 vs. AMD AM5 routes. How good are these systems at what exactly and will you keep them, upgrade them or sell down the line. That is what people worry about right now. By the way both ways can be financially quite equivalent, but I would say the initial investment for Intel and power usage at the moment is a little higher than for an AMD system. A budget of 400 is basically an i3 on a cheap 1700 intel or the AMD version from above and the AMD is faster and better and has the much better GPU, so it is perhaps your only real option here. It's like Android vs. iPhone You can buy a new iPhone every other year and get some money for the old model, so that the difference pays about for a mediocre Android or you can buy a mediocre Android for a third of the price, throw that away in 2 years and get a new one. After the initial investment for Apple you effectively lose the same amount of money, but you probably do have a better phone. And just like with Android, you will have to pay for a lot of apps that are free for Android. Right now Intel probably is a little bit better than AMD for most things except for maybe gaming, but it costs more and you need to pay more as you go, because AMD is more energy efficient and not just by a little bit. So the true answer to your question is probably that you might be able to get a nice PC for 400ish, but not with a discrete GPU. A 4060 is 300 by itself and is about the entry barrier to 4k gaming on very low settings. Gaming sites will tell you that it is basically a 1080p only card. The 4070 costs a little over 600. And that plus the above Intel build gets a solid creator PC that you can max games out with at 1440p and that will still play most new titles well if you lower some of the settings. And something like that was the topic for the last video on this channel. That's basically the equivalent of last years iPhone for you. If that's your work tool and you make money with your PC work, that's probably where it starts. The 900 dollar build was really the barebones minimum like, if you don't make any money, but you also actually do a ton of work on your PC, you might be able to get by on that 900 dollar build or mine for 830 or whatever. Those aren't that different to be honest. I probably have the better CPU and he probably has an entry level GPU in there already, but that's a guess, because I only watched the 1.5k one and that is pretty much what I would do as well. I'd go NZXT for the case though, but it's all within 10-20 bucks of what anyone with good knowledge would do. The man knows his fans, coolers and m.2 SSDs though, that's for sure.
What’s the Best Value “Bang-4-Buck” Intel Build ?….( Motherboard, CPU, RAM, GPU )
why not using ryzen xxxx3d cpu than test benchmark
Better to show performance/watt also
Vegas Pro? :)
😂😂😂😂😂
5950x vs 7950x again, so confusing 5th had better playback sometimes :)
By now I'm pretty sure you guys are clones. There are only two names on the credits of every video. The same two guys. You are releasing once every two days. The production quality and amount of research beating whole production houses. If you are reading this comment, please congratulate the other clones.
very useful video for people thinking on going amd and getting extra cores
TLDR For 4k get intel For 8k get AMD
warranty of factory spec? This guy is clueless. AMDs website shows you which ram kits to buy to get speeds up to 6000. There is no fine print saying you will void your warranty. Not that I care what he does. But I think that qualifies as AMD approved. Pretty sure he knows that also.
have you tested this for yourself? i have and running 4 sticks of 6000MHz on AM5 is a horror show. At 5600MHz no issues.
Yeah the whole "warranty" statement left a weird taste in my mouth, I don't buy it.
I think he worded that a bit poorly but his intention was to state the default memory controller frequency. Expo doesn’t void warranty and in fact AMD was paying for shipping broken CPUs from that SOC voltage fiasco a few months back. Tldr: he probably didn’t mean warranty
I highly recommend checking out AMD's EXPO page here: www.amd.com/en/technologies/expo Click on the little arrow on this page and footnotes, which is very interesting. Now at the same time even though they shouldn't officially warranty the OC-d CPU I've heard multiple stories how AMD has replaced the CPUs even when they've been OC-d. This could vary by region and they 'don't have to legally', but it's just an important point to consider... Also, this conversation with JJ might also shed light on this topic: kzhead.info/sun/qt6PisuMh2RoY2w/bejne.htmlsi=pvUyBWl9qGIrmToJ
I was literally just asking myself this question.
the price of the motherboard is more then my budget for entire pc so , slowly walks away ,,,,
no cpu power usage??
Done in a different video!
what is best for coding, ml etc? amd or intel
generally speaking from what I have heard intel is slightly better overall in coding, although having friends who code, they say its easier to build an amd rig that runs cooler and quieter during their work than a modern intel rig without sacrificing much performance. but if you want the best performance at the moment just go intel, although maybe wait for 14th gen to come out for price drops
@@sparklingionthanks for the suggestion. I was running a complicated code in my current pc but it couldn't run properly so I was thinking of getting a new one
@@cybercop47 what’s your current specs?
@@sparklingion i7 10700 16gb ram no dedicated gpu
@@cybercop47 10700 is still quite capable overall, maybe just the lack of gpu holding you back? Really depends on what you’re doing I guess. 16gb is also fine for most, but usually workloads are starting to require or need more, generally most are fine with just 16
So the conclusion is that amd needs a good Igpu for video editing and it will suppress easily intel cpus
They already have, but they are ALWAYS late to the game or brush aside. Intel was the first to showcase that iGPU can be used for other than display graphics and game, Nvidia followed suit. AMD claims that you need more CPU cores, not a dedicated SIP like NVENC and QuickSync, but time and time again, both Intel and Nvidia proved AMD wrong; image quality and performance gets better. AMD is not a very innovative company, they simply copy-paste whatever their competitor(s) are doing, and giving a shortchange.
Just admit they are bad at the task lol. Don't have to faboy over some brand xD buy what suits your task
@@AlfaPro1337 As long as there are options and competition , personally I would be happy with either brands in my PC. The difference is not chaotic.
@@AlfaPro1337hahaha spotted on buddy
@@thodorisi.2889 The CPU space is just duopoly. GPU space too, even when Intel enters the chat. Whatever Nvidia's charging, AMD simply undercut them slightly by US$100-200. There's literally no competition for QS and NVENC, yet, both Intel and Nvidia are improving their SIP. AFAIK, neither compared their SIP together, it's always QS vs CPU H264, or NVENC vs CPU.
"pugetbench for davinci resolve" test only use 1 track of videos ,. that suppress intel igpu performance ; the real advantage of UHD iis , it have 2 decoders which make it 2-3 times fatser then dpgu's ,. and this 2 decoder only work , if we use more than 2 track of videos (of course we use more than 2 timeline videos),. so testing UHD performance with "pugetbench for davinci resolve" is pointless;
good addition!