Allied tank destroyed by Axis during Second Mondial War: American Sherman, Soviet T-34, T-26, T-28, Brithish Matilda, French Char B1 and KV-2, KV-1, IS-2, Pershing, ML VIII Cromwell, M3 Lee, A10 Cruiser, Churcill, BT-7
Allied tank destroyed by Axis during Second Mondial War: American Sherman, Soviet T-34, T-26, T-28, Brithish Matilda, French Char B1 and KV-2, KV-1, IS-2, Pershing, ML VIII Cromwell, M3 Lee, A10 Cruiser, Churcill, BT-7
My great-Grandpa was a Bulgarian who served in WW2 on the German side. He used to tell me stories about singing Lili Marlene while destroying Russian tanks.
Great
@Agent Hitler- FBI Bulgaria was allied with Germany during the war. They may have sent volunteers or an expeditionary force to the eastern front
@Agent Hitler- FBI well, you are right. However after the armistice the Bulgarians fought on the Allied side of the Eastern Front. I don’t know but this may be the event mentioned here
@Agent Hitler- FBI I was suggesting that he was mistaken
@Agent Hitler- FBI I don’t know the full story. His grandfather could have ran away to join the Wehrmacht after the armistice, he could have defected to the Germans against the Tsar’s orders... I don’t know
My great grandfather told me that he joined the 2nd Armored Division he became a machine gunner and he said "Seeing a panzerfaust aiming at your tank you will just have to think if you can survive that" Because armors of the shermans in ww2 isn't strong as other shermans He passed away in 2006
In WoT Blitz Sherman have a bad armor.
In truth, the armor of the Sherman was slightly thicker than the T34-76, the difference was in the sloping of the armor. Not even the Tiger could take a hit from the Panzerfaust, or the M9 Bazooka, even in the front hull (the front mantlet was practically impenetrable), from the sides even the short-barreled 75mm could penetrate at 500 meters. The 17 pounder, and the longer-barreled 76mm, could penetrate both sides from 1000 meters. Oddly, you hardly ever have someone showing that!
Que descanse em paz seu avô..LUTOU PELA LIBERDADE..UM HERÓI..DEUS SEMPRE O TENHA 🙏🙏
Thank you for your share. Bless your grandfathers soul. American owes these and all vets their thanks.
@@hrodberht.027 wot jogo de criança da porra
*_WARNING_* If you see _'equipment'_ when you expect _'crew'_ or _'team'_ it might be due to the fact that the author is a native speaker of Italian and in most Latin-based languages both words are written the same. Here in Italian _'equipaggio'_ as _'equipo'_ in Castilian and _'équipage'_ in French. Let's jump over this language barrier and enjoy the video. 😊
Preussen über alles in fact I understood the meaning because I am an Italian native speaker...but is horrible to read "equipment in save" when a derelict tank is shown....
@@jerrykofiadonu4763 : 😂😂😂 It's like a sunk submarine officially called _'permanently deployed'_ on the bottom of the ocean.
Here in Brasil (portuguese base language) we have "equipe" to team or crew and "equipamento" to equipment, it is, indeed a little confusion ;-;
Equipaggiamento = equipment
In spanish the crew is never a "equipo", they are "tripulación", the "equipo"'s are for sports
Fascinating. I’m just VERY glad I’ll never have to climb into a tank and go into combat. Terrifying. There is some shocking footage of dead WW2 tank crews being lifted from knocked out tanks. And they were just kids. Much as I love military history war really is utter bollocks.
I worked at a company that hired a Russian, engineer back in the early 90's. He said his grandfather worked for a Unit in the Soviet Army, that got war footage for none other than Joseph Stalin. He said fortunately his grandfather, was a producer/technical for the films. and wasn't a combat cameraman He said that the boss wanted POV footage of the combat. He said they had criminals and deserters locked in tanks to fight and win or die. along with all kinds of crazy shit. He said the films are still locked away at that time 30 years ago.
literally same as today
Panzerfaust, although very short ranged, was deadly to enemy tanks. Grandfather to the RPG family.
David James No, the bazooka is the grandfather. In fact the Germans copied the bazooka and made the panzershreck.
@@cchaffe the difference is the other one is a shape charge which is more effective
@@northropp-61blackwidow34 the deployment mechanism is also different the faust was somewhat like a piat but using blackpowder and disposable. The bazooka was a rocket propelled warhead. The panzerfaust was definitely more destructive but it was a close range weapon for the most part, better than trying to use mines though.
@Hrvatska Policija desperation led to the approval of alot of non conventional projects, some were money sinks ( porsche tanks) and most of the successful ones were incomplete and badly engineered to the point of weakness. The stg was definitely revolutionary in adopting various concepts from previous wars and nations but it was also a bad system in various areas.
Yes, allies copy a lot of Nazi technology after the war.
Thanks for this. We don`t often get to see things from this perspective.
24:09 Т-34-85 с номером К210 командира 2-й танковой роты 1-го батальона 20-й тбр. 28 июля бригада силами 1-го танкового батальона «стремительной атакой ворвалась в Седлец и вышла на северо-западную окраину города, где вела тяжёлые бои с танками, артиллерией и пехотой противника. Ввиду отсутствия пехоты и артиллерийского прикрытия батальон выведен на юго-западную окраину Седлеца» Возглавлял атаку 1-го батальона его командир, будущий Герой Советского Союза майор Александр Герасимович Булгаков - представление к высшему званию было подано командованием бригады буквально накануне, 25 июля, за успешные действия при освобождении городов Парчев, Радзынь, Луков. Однако на этот раз атака при поддержке 1-й роты 50-го огв.ттп закончилась неудачей: ударная группа угодила в засаду и, ведя тяжёлый бой с немецкими танками и противотанковыми орудиями, была вынуждена с потерями отступить. Сводка штаба 11-го гласила: «20-я тбр к 12:00 закрепилась на перекрёстке железной и шоссейной дорог в районе Стшала. В 13:00 была контратакована 21 танком, 7 самоходными орудиями и до батальона мотопехоты противника с артиллерией из района Стшала. К 15:00, уничтожив 6 танков противника и подбив 7 самоходных орудий, потеряв при этом 4 танка [первоначальная запись «9 танков» в документе позднее исправлена. - Прим. авт.], бригада отошла на северо-западную окраину Седлеца. Частью сил 3-го танкового батальона во взаимодействии с 3-й гвардейской кавалерийской дивизией прикрывает шоссейные дороги Седлец - Варшава, Седлец - Серочин. Потери: сгорело танков Т-34 - 4, убито офицеров - 1, ранено - 3. Сержантского состава ранено 6 человек». Данные по потерям личного состава в ежедневной сводке, по всей видимости, были записаны со слов вышедших из боя. Согласно отчётным документам по потерям личного состава, 20-я тбр в боях 29 июля потеряла не менее трёх командиров орудий: командир орудия сержант Швецов Егор Алексеевич; командир орудия сержант Руденко Александр Данилович; командир орудия старший сержант Енокян Перч Седракович; заряжающий сержант Хнычкин Василий Николаевич; пулемётчик сержант Бикбаев Павел Иванович; радиомастер старший сержант Прокопенко Николай Захарович; командир роты автоматчиков младший лейтенат Альпенидзе Тарас Нарикович. На вечер 29 июля, после боя в северной части Седльце, бригада докладывала о наличии в строю 28 танков, ещё 7 числились в ремонте, а 18 отнесены к безвозвратным потерям. Танк с номером К210 был оставлен на поле боя с небольшими повреждениями ходовой части, которые немецкие танкисты позднее устранили и поставили трофей на ход. Он интересен тем, что принадлежал командиру 2-й роты и мог использоваться офицером, управлявшим боем. Фото avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-zen_doc/1567507/pub_5db1acfddf944400b1208c44_5db1e14f32335400b1392abf/scale_1200 Фото используется как фейк avatars.mds.yandex.net/get-zen_doc/1574327/pub_5db1acfddf944400b1208c44_5db1c17ba06eaf00b019f4ae/scale_1200
00:24 that guy just had his leg blown off, but had enough adrenalin left to get out of the tank.....what a hero!
He not survive
11:03 Известное фото: брошенные в районе Дубно Ровенской области Украинской ССР тяжелый танк Т-35 (образца 1938 г.) и легкий Т-26 (образца 1939 г.). На башне Т-35 видны две белые параллельные полосы - тактическое обозначение машин тактический знак 67-го танкового полка 34-й танковой дивизии 8-го механизированного корпуса Киевского особого военного округа, Т-26 - той же дивизии.
8:36 Подбитый у тюрьмы города Венев советский танк КВ-1. Танк принадлежал 32-й танковой бригаде, был подбит 27 ноября 1941 года во время боев за город. В правом борту башни видны не менее 20 попаданий разного калибра, прострелен и ствол орудия.
I think kV hit by tiger 2 or tiger 1? Because his caliber same 88m
@@tankblitzmalaysia1100 On November 27, 1941 , the Germans had no tigers near Moscow.
@@Ebash-Banderu ouhh
@@Ebash-Banderu panzer 4 or stug 3 maybe , those were good armour
Any man that takes on a tank on his own is close to a super man with steel balls
The German named the Sherman „ Feuerzeug „ because most of the time they went up in flames. When they hit the Sherman.
It was actually the tank with the lowest chance to be set alight
5:28. Похоже кадр отзеркален. На нем: Танк «Тигр» 101-го тяжелого танкового батальона СС, подбитый в Виллер-Бокаж (Villers-Bocage) 13 июня 1944 года. Этим танком, из состава 2-й роты, 101-го тяжелого танкового батальона СС (schwere SS-Panzer Abteilung 101), командовал обер-штурмфюрер СС Ханнес Филипсен (Hannes Philipsen). Механик-водитель «Тигра» был выведен из строя, и танк продолжал движение по инерции вниз по улице, пока не врезался в здание магазина. Экипаж покинул машину и скрылся, Филипсен погиб через три дня.
👍
1:17 Panther loader: YEET!!
Great footage. Thanks for sharing.
8:01, it's a Vicker 6ton Mark E (british built but exported in a lot of place)
17:30, it's a t-34-76
Damn, good eyes, I would have thought it was a t-34-57
zvallid Can you please tell me what piece of music is filled with 10 seconds of video?
sorry it's an old video, I've cancelled all files related to this video. I think it come from youtube music library
Great selection of images. COMBAT (not combact) But a Great job. Shocking -but fascinating at the same time.
Ничего. Старший брат моей бабушки очень удачно жжег немецкие танки. Как под Москвой начал , так под Берлином закончил.
@Алекс Кулинич По своему деду судишь? Бывает. Как у кого в родне шваль оказывается , так он на радостях начинает других грязью мазать.
12:41, the tank hited had a 85mm, it's either the T-34-85 or the IS-1, both have the 85mm D5T or Zis-53 but not the KV-1
At 7:18 the tank labelled as Sherman is actually a Grant. Note the riveted construction. at 15.33 the "M10 Wolverine" appears to be a T34. At 15:51 the "T34?" is an M10 Wolverine tank destroyer.
T34 US heavy or T-34 Soviet? T34 US heavy tank has yet to be in Battle
@13:04 was that a crew men’s body falling down after the turret hits the ground? To the left on the screen
It's possible. Kinda looks like it.
Thank you. Hell of a job to find all these clips.
24:15 Танк Т-34-76 с номером К249 3-го батальона 20-й танковой бригады. 29 июля 1944 г. Седльце. Польша.
AWESOME, thank you homie.
WW2 tanks were basically just big metal coffins. A metal box stuffed full of ammunition, meat, and in some tank designs: fuel tanks. I feel bad for modern tankers, especially the ones in Ukraine that are facing threats WW2 tankers didn't face like drones, ATGMs, and top-attack munitions. You aren't even safe behind friendly lines anymore.
Awesome footage 😀
✝️🙏 RIP ALL SOLDIERS FROM ANY SIDE..!!⚫
Смерть нацистам, пусть идут в ад...
@@user-ke8or5cw8i ok Commie lol
All wehraboos right now: “Welcome my dear dick, we’re gonna have fun each other for half an hour, jaaa!”
Remember camera man can follow you everywhere
and it's called Sturmgeschütz - or with an "Umlaut" Sturmgeschuetz, not Sturmgeschmutz
+Sven Frey I know but I have no umlaut in my keyboard
And that's why you have to write it with "ue" in Germany it's the same as "ü" :)
+Sven Frey thank you, I'll use next time
+zvallid you're welcome! :)
+Sven Frey Sturmgeshütz or without an umlaut Sturmgeshuetz :-)
1:59 looks like a KV-1.
Um dos melhores vídeos que já assisti parabéns ótimo
Thanks to you for show those magnific film l don t understan how lost the war.
11:42 the driver is still allive and it seems he want to drive his burning tank to the enemy lines. What a man!
Sorry! I mean 11:24!
He is probably dead already the t34s had a strange gearbox which would sometimes keep going forward like an old tractor
@@willus567 Yes the early t 34 veesions were sometimes a little strange but the tank was good
@@dominikconrad280 stronk Stalinium intensified
Doesnt looks like its fire More like smoke U can clearly see that there is a smoke grenade laying on the floor close to the tank
Thank you for inspiring me to make a 30 min of destroyed axis tanks video
Good luck finding all the footage
@@naosei2.086 oh i have quite a bit
@@ISU-KV- still haven’t made one
@@naosei2.086 I mean, it wouldn't be that hard. There were a lot of knocked out German armour
27:38, the first tank on the left is a BT-5, the next one on the right is a T-35,
You can feature virtually the entire 7th Armoured division after Michael Wittman got through with them. 😮
Thank God for the Sherman crews that survived WW2. How could the American Army field such an unsafe piece of equipment.
It was literally the safest tank of WW2. Sherman crews had an extremely low mortality rate. In the entire war only around a thousand tankers died.
good job collecting such old recordings mate
Its too bad he can't bloody identify most of them.
1:49 This seems more likely to be a Hs 129, not a stuka. Stuka has two cannons that fire in unison.
12:31, the turret look like the one from a Valentine or the Matilda II, the Valentine have a similar hull shape too. but while the T-34 hull look like that hull, the turret do not look like it and the barrel look to be a british 2pounder (used on some valentine tank)
Pure satisfaction
Shut up
@@mitarbeitermarcelhering6487 shut up
@@JV-bj4kx is isn't pure satisfaction seing destroyed Tanks because you know that people died in there
And people say Shermans performed better than the other German tanks which 'can barely move freely without breaking down' German tanks improved their horrendous unreliability problems after Kursk
it's easy to point and claim superiority of a nation's armor when the entire video is a compilation of their exact purpose, put all into perspective and germans did not do well with tanks any time during the war.
Well Kursk was basically a battle test for the new german cats, that’s why it often breaks down because it hasn’t been throughly field tested and improved upon
Actually, by Kursk the MK's III & IV were very reliable tanks as to their drivetrain and overall systems, as was the Tiger, although slightly less so. It was the Panther that had teething issues, literally. The StuG, based on the MK III, was VERY reliable.
German tanks upgraded to inductive Prox switches after the north Africa campaign. Genius! Don't believe me, look it up!
Mis respetos para todas aquellas valientes vidas perdidas durante este documental. ⚫⚪⚡⚔️⚙️💐
TimmyO toole , когда фильм снимает ни кто не умерает . Люди погибли в дистивитеным войне . Им вечный память!!! 🌹
Очень много ошибок в видео- вместо М3 Stuart-Sherman, вместо T34-M10, и много чего ещё ошибочного. В общем, стыдно должно быть автору показывать такой бред широкой публике...
hahaahahahah🤣
Смешали пропагандистке фильмы с историческими кадрами и кормят неискушенных. )
@@user-wz9tx3do8m на 1'10" Ju 87G-1 (с двумя пушками 37 мм) поджигает КВ-1, на 2'10" не Т-34, а два БТ-7. Далее не "Шерман B1" в Нормандии, а французский Char B-1 в 1940 году. полно и других неточностей. и из учебных фильмов кадры
16'30 нет такого КВ--81, был КВ-85, но пушка коротка и командирской башенки не видно, так что скорее всего Т-34
15'44" Пантера, подбитая обошедшим ее Першингом в Кельне
What is the music in the background?
NICE collection
3:35 it's an t 37 heawy tank
Thank you for putting these clips together and publishing here. Many of the scenes are staged and many of the captions have the wrong tanks listed, but that didn't detract from my enjoyment.
that tank on the minute 7:39 wasn't a M-10 Wolverine it was a Sherman M4A4 Firefly with the 17 pounder cannon
17:10, it's a french turret on the left, maybe a Char D1 or D2
15:40 пантера
Ja, schon damals war das Shooting gut! Interessantes und wertvolles Material. Krieg aus einer anderen Perspektive. Bilder des Krieges, die wir nicht kennen. Danke an den Autor, tolle Arbeit !!
When 1 of these shermans get hit do they scrap the whole tank or patch it up. Some of them show the whole tank explode inside I would think all of the equipment inside would be damage do they repair or scrap them?
+ualuuanie Most of the ones that didn't burn from the ammunition were typically repaired and put back into service.
Nathan Peterson That would take a long time. They would need to remove all the damage equipment, install new ones and not forgetting the body works and paint job.
ualuuanie Typically, whether it burned or not, the transmission, running gear, gear box, and engine blocks made it out fine. Assuming they weren't hit directly. Some M4s were simply cut in half, and the part that wasn't damaged replaced the other section of a tank that was damaged.
the problem wt german panzer force is the lack of fast moving-long range vehicles the Puma recon 8x8 would be a great chassi to use to fit a Flak 88 in the turrent wt its speed, range and manuverabillity and low cost would make its capacity able to strike in groups of 5 at lines of allied middle-tanks even knowing that they ar mass produced like the 50.000 m4 shemans they would be destroyed by a considerable inferior vehicle faster then they could be built and shipped to the front
Adding a weaponbof a size to a puma would ve impossible without making it slow and hard to use
Tanks... rolling metal coffins... always were... always will be!
8:13 great exit hole straight through Sherman by German 88mm !
Like butter
Amazing !
Yep Prob a AP or APCR, but why use that instead of the aphe?
13:02 see a T-34 crewman smack the ground after being launched with the turret
He believed
Großartiges tolles Videomaterial.
Sherman was only a meal for the tigers and panthers
?
@@jesserpinkman What are you on about?
That’s FALSE. See The Chieftains KZhead presentation on misconceptions about American armor in WW2.
And the Sherman's won. That math hurts don't it?
Roger Out - you’re probably thinking about Yamamoto. Tojo was one of the militarists who thought the US would crumble and fold - a serious miscalculation.
Finnaly,sick of seeing only destroyed Pz4s,Panthers and Tigers for decades!
That`s what I was getting at with my comment above.
Dieppe is where Churchill lost the confidence of his commanders but it was Roosevelt that kept in power. He was advised not to commit a large landing there by his Generals .
11:09, the turret is facing the other side, dont you see that the sherman is going backward? you even see the antenna that is at the rear of the turret.
25:00 останки этого танка установлены на площадке музея-панорамы Сталинградской битвы в г. Волгоград.
*_1k angry americans disliked_*
Or, people disappointed with the lack of effort identifying these vehicles?
@@peterson7082 *_They can fuck off, if they are allied tanks, it doesn't matter. There are too many edgy-obsessed nerds on this site that care too much about names._*
gotta love those KV-2s !!!
Excellent vid.
Germany lost the war just because it ran out of ammunition.
Certainly all of that happened, but the pivotal reason was that they ran out of both ammunition, weapons and soldiers for all of it was spent in the Eastern Front which Hitler feared the most, and for good reasons because of all the mayhem he had caused them. At last, the main lesson should be to shun military solutions but it seems that some people don't care to shed rivers of blood.
@Anthony Z : The Luftwaffe was destroyed in the Eastern Front, and so was the Wehrmacht as well. The Western Front was supported with minimal power for Hitler feared the revenge from Russians in view of the ruthless mayhem and slaughter caused there so that the most and the best of both weaponry and soldiers was sent to engage the Red Army along with most ammunition and fuel. The few skilled German pilots in the Western Front succumbed due to numbers, not quality, either of weaponry or human. *When 100 aircraft attack 10, and the former can replace all the shot down whereas the latter can't, that is to lose by numbers.* That is something Pindostanis lack both the gut and the wisdom to recognize for all the life since children they are brainwashed by Hollywood and its lies. Just check _Tobruk_ in Wikipedia for you to learn how a failed operation is presented like a successful one. The ranks in the Western Front was filled with elders and children, that decolorates the purported Pindostani _'victory'._ But as Pindstanis are utterly uncapable of any sense of honor, they prefer to make fake history movies. Have you ever seen a Pindostani reading books in a library instead of watching TV fake news? Have you ever seen a Pindostani buying dictionaries instead of gadgets for useless purposes?
Germany lost because it fought against the rest of the whole world!
@Roger Out Not when it was convenient they switched when Germany attacked them. The Soviets split up Poland with Germany at the start of the war.
@Roger Out Who's we. The Soviets were uneasy allies with Germany until they where attacked in the summer of 1941. By then France was already knocked out of the war.PS WW2 started when Germany and the Soviet Union invaded Poland and Great Britain and France honored their treaty with Poland. The US, while giving some aid to England, didn't really enter the war until Japan attacked Pearl Harbor and the genius Hitler declared war on the US. That insured that Germany had an enemy on both sides with almost unlimited manpower and resources.
23: 20 23:55 Седльце. Польша. 29 июля 1944 года. Один и тот же По всей видимости, перед боем командир танка №44 гвардии лейтенант Кузнецов заменил выбывшего по неизвестным причинам командира танка №33 гвардии лейтенанта Фёдора Алексеевича Грубиянова. Вот видео и инфа kzhead.info/sun/ocmbZd1pkZF-oaM/bejne.html
At 26:38 that's not even remotely a British Sherman, it's not an allied tank at all. It's a destroyed Panther. You can easily tell by the larger size, different shape, the fact it has a commander's cupola on top, different drive train/wheels, the muzzle brake and gun mantlet- all very different from a Sherman. Compare it with the following picture at 26:40 which is a Sherman and you can notice the different shape, smaller size, different drive train/wheels and the lack of commander's cupola (and before you say "It's a Firefly variant" the Firefly only noticeable difference from other Shermans is the gun, the rest of it is pretty much the same)
Beautifull Video wir deutschen können es halt und sollten die welt regieren
nice video!!!!!!! Axis Stronk!
Jingle Jangle they were so strong that they lost
@@Loup-mx7yt stronger than russia :P
Sweet !
It's so satisfying to watch 😍
Sherman at 2:30 is a movie scene from Band of Brothers.
LOVED watching the STUKA "Tank Buster" gun down that T-34.
Me too
Are you a fucking nazi lover or sommin
David James Probably the master. He was awesome with that 37mm. Obviously the highest score of anyone. Hans Ulrich Rudel had no equal, even with one leg.
james pulford No he recognized ability. Apparently he missed your non ability to grasp the English language.
@@Filmpilot apparently all German soldiers were Nazis. Its funny how people automatically resort to calling someone a Nazi when they just recognize skillfull work by a German soldier.
Shermans were no match to german steel
+MrPearlJack right
+MrPearlJack No match? Put it against a Pzkpfw IV then you have a match.
+MrPearlJack nice to see you here, Mr animator :)
+MrPearlJack And German steel was no match for allied air power.
+Strommy777 yeh a real good army to shit scared to face a country head on just bomb them for months most of them not even soldiers just civs at work most of us bombings took place while germany was retreating back to germany fucking cowards and not alot has changed us still use planes to replace there tiny balls
Sehr gute - mir bis jetzt nicht bekannte - Aufnahmen ! Leider stimmt oft die Typ-Bezeichnungen zu dem gezeigten Filmmaterial nicht überein . Ansonsten super informativ !
jeloo Caught most if not all of the errors. Good work!
25:13, it's hard to tell how it was destroy, but the blast was causing the tank to roll over, not the damaged turret that show the tank made more than one roll, it need a good blast for making a tank roll, unlike the improvise explosive who usually just break the track, probably a mine or a bomb from a dive bomber. the missing wheel and track may just had been salvaged.
yep German Panzer was far superior but that pershing you said was actually a German panther killed by the 90mm from a pershing heavy tank and the firefly you mentioned did have larger longer gun but not the firefly with the 18'ft 17pounder L7 gun it was the latermodel up gunned Sherman A4 E8 or Easy 8 with 76mm gun thanx I'm here all week good video tho honest mistakes really I felt they needed correction was all
No German non-prototype WW2 tank was superior to the Pershing. End of story.
Justin Berryman wtf man panther is superior with its high velocity 75 mm cannon penetrates more than Pershing and Tiger 1
「Vythal」 and a good frontal armor wich Pershing cant pen just the turret but panther can pen it everywhere
That’s FALSE. See The Chieftains KZhead presentation on misconceptions about American armor in WW2.
4:00 No Churchill MK VII were used in the Dieppe raid, the 4 types used were the MK I, MK II, MK II Oke and the Mk III.
Pershing hit by panzerfaust at 15:42.... is that not a panther hit by pershing during battle of cologne?
5:17 Not a Churchill, IIRC, an American Stuart light tank
Alemanha .... Sempre um show em cada vídeo que assisto. Eternamente Maravilhosa.
Just for the main title i can Tell the vid is gonna be satisfatory af
3:18 is samua s-35 no sherman. It is the French tanks no us tanks
Friggin any war unless for self defense is makin tank makers rich and vets go home in body bags. let the damn politicians volunteer to go fight yike
thankgodfordavidgf So you just going to let the Germans hand free in Europe?
Love seeing the Shermans with holes in them !
David James Germans were bad ass
?
No one else does. There are people in there
Love seeing the Panthers/Tigers with holes in them! But seriously asshole. There were people in those tanks. Evil bastard.
@Oi Can you read? I said it as a mere joke to point out the barbarism in his comment. Why I said seriously. And I said "tanks" not American tanks. That could refer to all tanks when I said it in my second sentence.
Who would choose to operate a Ford, Chrysler or Chevy rather than say a Porsche, BMW or Mercedes.
At 7:42 that looks like a Sherman not Wolverine.
Gracias por compartir
Hi, At 3:18 it's clearly not à sherman but a French Somua tank. Question: why this background music ?! It's probably not a good choice.
Sherman was no Tank, it was an joke :-D
it was a logistically viable option that was strategically superior for the situation. While they got roasted half the time, the germans lost due to the fact that they couldnt field or equip thier units to the capacity that the allies did. Hense the sherman being the most viable choice.
Yea such a joke that they were still using it in the 1973 Yom Kippur war.... what a pile of crap, clearly.
just because they still hade 10000000 rosty cans
there's a thing called upgrade packages. The last shermans where completely differant, and where even then pretty antiquated. Hense why the abrams is over 30 years old and still going strong.
hence....germany won....oh wait....
Queria passar onde foi esses combates fica na historia
3:59 is not a Churchill VII but a Churchill I. The VII had covered tracks while the I had open tracks.
+Arjen Muit (D3al3r) Unless the Churchill VIIs had some sort of alien time machine and teleporting device, Churchill VIIs didn't even exist yet when Dieppe happened