The Battle of the North Cape - Ice and Fire at Sea

2019 ж. 15 Қаң.
1 135 554 Рет қаралды

In which we examine the last stand of the Scharnhorst and the various changes in naval tactics and technology tested and proved in the battle.
Want to support the channel? - / drachinifel
Want to talk about ships? / discord
Music - / ncmepicmusic

Пікірлер
  • Pinned post for Q&A :)

    @Drachinifel@Drachinifel5 жыл бұрын
    • Was there ever a problem with large naval guns (5- to 16-inch) deafening or incapacitating other people on the deck, like firefighting crews or nearby gun crews for smaller AA guns? Is there active gun design or gun layout to prevent this, and if so, what is it? Especially, what is the dangerous radius around the big gun muzzle?

      @henryh.448@henryh.4485 жыл бұрын
    • If the japanese did manage to complete their 8-8 program, would they still build the yamato class

      @datgood121@datgood1215 жыл бұрын
    • If the Italian Navy was on par with that of the Imperial japanese navy, would have they stopped the British from dominating in the first place?

      @joweeqc98@joweeqc985 жыл бұрын
    • What, other than parts availability, naval treaties, and the nature of gunnery, and structural integrity issues, stopped the Americans from just giving the Iowas two single 20" guns and a lot more armor?

      @typehere6689@typehere66895 жыл бұрын
    • Can you discuss fratricide between USN aircraft and USN anti-aircraft (in the Pacific). How big of a problem was it? Are there notable 'incidents'. What doctrine/tactics/policy/procedures were used to mitigate fratricide?

      @Kevin_Kennelly@Kevin_Kennelly5 жыл бұрын
  • 22:34 “a harmless star shell” **aggressive Taffy 3 noises**

    @claypidgeon4807@claypidgeon48073 жыл бұрын
    • The USS Samuel B. Roberts - "The primary use of this weapon is to violate the Geneva Convention."

      @jonathanh5106@jonathanh51062 жыл бұрын
    • But with what you know of Admiral Bey, do you think he would have run from Taffy 3 even had he been in Scharnhorst, and not in Yamato?

      @PalleRasmussen@PalleRasmussenАй бұрын
  • Hope that guy who spliced Duke of York's radar back together got a medal.

    @MarioMario-vn3fx@MarioMario-vn3fx5 жыл бұрын
    • I think it's likely he did as honors were given out for a job well done. The Russians were also very pleased with the result.

      @brianspendelow840@brianspendelow8405 жыл бұрын
    • @@cogidubnus1953 Seems to state a somewhat different version of events as in he never repaired split cables rather realigning the radars aerials still the key parts are probably aloft, dark, force 8 gale. Maybe it was better to give a brave man a tale the public could understand the important of.

      @jonathanevans4610@jonathanevans46105 жыл бұрын
    • @@jonathanevans4610 Absolutely...that's what I read between the lines anyhow!

      @cogidubnus1953@cogidubnus19535 жыл бұрын
    • @@cogidubnus1953 Hat off for Barehands Bates, I too have climbed a mast in a winter gale to repair electrical wiring in well below freezing conditions. An experience I don't care to repeat.

      @N0rdman@N0rdman5 жыл бұрын
    • N0rdman My cousin, as captain of a container ship, did the same to chop ice off the radar ariel so it could revolve as his crew had flat refused due to the swinging of the mast in the high seas. He got half way up and thought “What the bloody hell am I doing up here? I’m the bloody Captain! And this is stupidly dangerous!” He still got the antenna moving though.

      @SvenTviking@SvenTviking5 жыл бұрын
  • Interesting that the Saumarez seems to have been able to punch torpedoes not only into the Scharnhorst but later into IJN Haguro. Little beast of a destroyer.

    @dalehawthorne6301@dalehawthorne6301 Жыл бұрын
    • My father was on the Saumarez for both of the battles

      @jeffwalters6778@jeffwalters67782 ай бұрын
  • 76 years ago today. Second to last Battleship fight in history. I know the Germans were the enemy but what a terrible way to die, stay on a burning sinking ship or freeze to death in the water. The merchant marine suffered through this type of death for years in WWII. Brave souls all. RIP.

    @73Trident@73Trident4 жыл бұрын
    • At the end of the day, all sailors are sailors

      @tomirk4404@tomirk4404 Жыл бұрын
    • Aye.

      @shep9231@shep92313 ай бұрын
  • My Dad was a 20 year old midshipmen on Duke of York at North cape, still have his log book.

    @trondog8503@trondog85033 жыл бұрын
    • Peacetime is strange. In all my decades as a network tech I've never had to scale a mast in terrible weather, under fire, and get the network back up. Those boys were the best.

      @arturoarzadon5525@arturoarzadon55253 жыл бұрын
    • my uncle norman was a marine on hms belfast

      @peterhowell4233@peterhowell42332 жыл бұрын
    • My dad was an era he was 21 just he released one of the anchors that jamed have a photo of the survivors my father never spoke about it

      @janicedavis4920@janicedavis49202 жыл бұрын
    • @@arturoarzadon5525 Why would you repost Neil Wilson's comment - made over a year earlier? Are you so pathetic that you are reduced to stealing other people's KZhead posts?

      @davidforbes7772@davidforbes77722 жыл бұрын
    • My Great uncle was a Lieutenant Gunnery Officer on the HMS Duke of York (Llewellyn Scillitoe MBE) during this action (age 45) he was awarded a MiD and I have his medals with his Oak Leaf cluster on his 39-45 Star. This action took place just before his 45 Birthday (28 Dec), Your Dad would likely have known my great uncle. He had previously been on HMS Renown in 1940 when they first encountered the KMS Scharnhorst in the North Sea off the Lofoten Islands in Apr 40. What brave souls they were. Greatest respect....

      @colingb5877@colingb5877 Жыл бұрын
  • The Germans never thought that the British could have developed the cavity magnetron for microwave radar at the end of 1943. They understood the concept of the cavity magnetron, but they used the klystron tube as a more stable source of UHF radar signals up to about 750 MHz. The British vessel's true microwave radar transmitting at 3 GHz was never seen by the Germans, since their radar warning receivers only went up to about 900 MHz. British radar receivers were able to pick up the German radar signals from about 50 miles out. The Germans also needed about 4 kw of power to get only about half the range as the British obtained with 1 kw of power. This was a big deal in ship's electrical systems never constructed to handle these additional power demands. The Battle of the North Cape demonstrated once and forever the primacy of ships that had the most advanced radars and best trained radar operators. Before this, many senior naval officers considered radar as little more than a technological toy developed by the big brains back home. The other radar lesson from the battle was the need to develop smaller radar antennas that were less prone to battle damage and the overriding importance of redundant cabling so a lucky hit couldn't sever the one cable set used operate the radar.

    @sarjim4381@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
    • The night action of the 4th battle of savo island is a much better demonstration of integrated radar fire control on Washington and South Dakota.

      @dongiovanni13@dongiovanni135 жыл бұрын
    • @@dongiovanni13 You're thinking of the Second Naval Battle of Guadalcanal. It was not really a good demonstration of what radar would become, except for Washington's surface search set acquiring the Japanese task force 31 miles from the entrance to the Strait. After that, Washington lost the Japanese in the clutter of the many small islands in the Strait. South Dakota's radars and pretty much all her communications facilities were destroyed by battle damage early on in the battle. When Washington found the Japanese again, it was done mostly visually. GFC radar helped with return fire but it wasn't integrated, even on the Washington, since the Combat Information Center concept was in its infancy. The Battle of Surigao Strait almost two years later, or the Revenge of the Pearl Harbor Battleships, was probably the best WWII example of radar integrated into a CIC during a surface engagement.

      @sarjim4381@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
    • @Alexander Challis Indeed, and even worse for the Germans, it was an offhand remark from a captured British airman that stopped them from using Metox on submarines. He pulled a prank of his interrogators by telling them British planes were able to home in on the incredibly weak RF radiation from the Metox receiver's local oscillator. Since the Germans couldn't believe that the Enigma code had been broken, they had long believed the British had some kind of submarine detector that allowed Coastal Command planes to attack a surfaced sub without warning. As a result of this prank, Doenitz ordered all Metox units turned off on July 31, 1943. In addition to Enigma intercepts, the British had developed airborne centimetric radar, something the Germans believed impossible. It was this higher frequency radar that was the cause of more attacks, not planes detecting a Metox receiver. The USN wasn't immune to this silliness. A single experiment at Princeton "discovered" the signals from local oscillators of shipborne receivers could be picked up by a German sub 20 miles away. The Navy spent millions developing "radiation safe" radios and ordering all non-safe radios to be turned off when out of port. After the war it was discovered that the scientists involved had cooked the books and stretched the distance this signal could be received by using exceptionally poorly tuned radios with leaky LOs and huge antennas to pick up the LO signals. The distance using an average radio and average antenna was really about 75 feet. The test was paid for by a radio company named EH Scott, a name familiar to modern stereo buffs. I'll bet you can't guess which company was ready with compliant radios. :-)

      @sarjim4381@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
    • @@dongiovanni13 Either that or the night action during the battle of Cape Matapan. Where 3 Italian heavy cruisers were basically eviscerated in a single broadside from a combined 3 Battleships.

      @1993Crag@1993Crag5 жыл бұрын
    • @rpr6.5 creedmoor Yes, but the idea then was to have enough radar equipped ships that at least one would be able to cover any blind spots. The complete loss of power on South Dakota showed the weakness of that plan, and all capital ships would have at least two sets of radars and antennas after that.

      @sarjim4381@sarjim43815 жыл бұрын
  • For those who don't know, HMS Belfast is still around. She's enjoying a comfortable retirement in London on the Thames, moored just west of the Tower Bridge and directly across from the Tower of London on the opposite bank. (She's only a 15-minute walk from the Tower of London using the bridge.). The ship can be boarded and viewed for a small fee, and most sections of her from the engine rooms to the admiral's bridge are open to the public. There's also a great self-guided audio tour for those who want to know more about the ship, its history, and life aboard a British light cruiser in WW2. Her forward turret has a very interesting audio and visual presentation about the Battle of the North Cape and her role in it, complete with narrated accounts from her officers and crew. It plays up her part in the battle a bit, but that's honestly pretty typical for most preserved ships I've been on, and it's still a very fun and educational, albeit loud (simulated gunfire!), experience. (This info comes from my own visit in June 2018. Beautiful ship, definitely a treat to tour.)

    @1Korlash@1Korlash5 жыл бұрын
    • I enjoyed a fabulous afternoon exploring every inch of that warship a few years ago. That and the ship museums in Portsmouth were the best parts of all my European vacations so far.

      @carterjackson8033@carterjackson80335 жыл бұрын
    • I live about 40 odd miles away from The Belfast, visited on numerous occasions from boy to man :)

      @mrpirate3470@mrpirate34705 жыл бұрын
    • i went on it yesterday (not the first time tho)

      @apdouble7@apdouble75 жыл бұрын
    • Still find it sad that one of the KGC Battleships was not saved for our future generations to learn and marvel over, these amazing machines and the stories they tell

      @daveelliott5855@daveelliott58554 жыл бұрын
    • my great uncle also served on the belfast during ww2

      @apdouble7@apdouble74 жыл бұрын
  • Peacetime is strange. In all my decades as a network tech I've never had to scale a mast in terrible weather, under fire, and get the network back up. Those boys were the best.

    @neilwilson5785@neilwilson57855 жыл бұрын
    • Don't jinx yourself

      @matiastorres1510@matiastorres15104 жыл бұрын
  • The lieutenant who repaired the Duke of York's radar was Lt H. R. K. Bates RNVR. He also was accompanied by Able Seamen Horace Badkin and Geoffrey Whitton. I'm not sure if they assisted in the repairs.

    @treeshakertucker5840@treeshakertucker58405 жыл бұрын
    • I hope they got the medals they deserved.

      @TheLesserWeevil@TheLesserWeevil5 жыл бұрын
    • @@TheLesserWeevil D.SC for Bates and D.S.M for Badkin and Whitton.

      @treeshakertucker5840@treeshakertucker58405 жыл бұрын
    • @@treeshakertucker5840 I'm sorry but braving freezing weather in combat conditions to repair a series of cables and all they got was the Distinguished Service Cross/Medal? One would think some promotions would also be in order for an act like that...

      @adamdubin1276@adamdubin12765 жыл бұрын
    • @@adamdubin1276 Bates did end up a captain in the regular fleet. I'm not sure what happened to the Able Seamen.

      @treeshakertucker5840@treeshakertucker58405 жыл бұрын
    • @@treeshakertucker5840 Probably got promoted to cleaning the officer's heads.

      @wordzy@wordzy5 жыл бұрын
  • "the Norwegian destroyer showed remarkable antipathy to the Scharnhorst, blasting away at it all the way in and firing torpedoes point blank" alternate phrase: the Norwegian warship invoked its Viking ancestors on a raid heard within Valhalla

    @maxschaeffner9005@maxschaeffner90053 жыл бұрын
    • Cringe

      @wordsshackles441@wordsshackles441 Жыл бұрын
    • I disagree. That’s awesome.

      @Kowalski089@Kowalski089 Жыл бұрын
    • Cringe degenerate

      @macmaczee3485@macmaczee3485 Жыл бұрын
    • The Free Navies were crewed by patriots and madmen with the line between blurred often. And then there were the French :shrug:

      @davidlewis5312@davidlewis53129 ай бұрын
    • @@davidlewis5312mers el kebir was clear example

      @holdencross5904@holdencross59047 ай бұрын
  • The Scharnhorst never had a chance against a KGV class Battleship. These Battleships were splendid fighting machines and in my opinion greatly underrated by some over the years.

    @paulsalmon5928@paulsalmon59283 жыл бұрын
    • What class of battleship did any of the pocket battleships or armored cruisers stand a chance against? I suppose they had a chance of damaging a true battle cruiser or an Alaska, but any capital ship was going to make Swiss Cheese out of them. Worse, a fast battleship could at least meet their speed. An Iowa, Richelieu, or Dunkerque class could run them down. Battlecruisers existed when they were designed, the German navy was never going to be big enough to force the Royal Navy to keep all their capital ships in their home waters. The design was a mess to begin with.

      @recoil53@recoil53 Жыл бұрын
    • @@recoil53 The Scharnhorst was a battleship, not a pocket battleship. It would be an underdog, but bigger underdog victories have been won.

      @matthewhecht9257@matthewhecht9257 Жыл бұрын
    • @@matthewhecht9257 Every hit from a real battleship's guns would just go through the Scharnhorst's armor. Meanwhile they are all armored against stronger guns than the Scharnorst's 11 inch guns. Even the Alaska's 12 inch guns were about at strong as a WWI battleship's 14 inch guns. The Scharnorst would have to evade every shot from a battleship's guns while getting close enough to actually damage a battleship - in the open waters of the Atlantic.

      @recoil53@recoil53 Жыл бұрын
    • Scharnhorst had an armour scheme and strength comparable to Bismark, gun size was her weakness. There's a lot of nonsense talked about British 14 inch guns, their demolition of Scharnhorst proved their worth.

      @nickjolliffe8118@nickjolliffe8118 Жыл бұрын
    • @@nickjolliffe8118Even beyond the Scharnhorst. You yourself said that Scharnhorst and Bismarck had comparable armor schemes, and the Prince of Wales penetrated deep into the Bismarck, into her citadel, and mission k*lled her at Denmark Strait.

      @sebastianm538@sebastianm53811 ай бұрын
  • Every man on every ship had to know that they would likely die if they ended up in the sea. That had to take a special courage.

    @scotthill8787@scotthill87875 жыл бұрын
    • You basically have no choice at that point

      @sctm81@sctm812 жыл бұрын
    • A British submarine copped a bomb which didn't explode, but lodged a few feet below the deck at the end of a 40 foot long horizontal tube, a little over 18 inches in diameter. A small submariner pulled himself through the tube with a rope around his ankles. He worked for 2 hours defusing the bomb, all the time knowing that if a plane appeared on the horizon the submarine would dive, and he would be drowned. He won the Victoria Cross for that episode.

      @ianlowery6014@ianlowery6014 Жыл бұрын
  • Nothing like seeing a KG V class battleship ploughing through heavy seas.

    @phbrinsden@phbrinsden5 жыл бұрын
    • Literally

      @wierdalien1@wierdalien13 жыл бұрын
  • 22:05 and the Duke of York said: let there be light.

    @ironstarofmordian7098@ironstarofmordian70985 жыл бұрын
    • And then the Scharnhorst answered: „Please make it dark again.“

      @fabianzimmermann5495@fabianzimmermann54954 жыл бұрын
    • And the Duke answered no and commanded his escorts to cast the Scharnhorst into the depths

      @Cpt_Boony_Hat@Cpt_Boony_Hat4 жыл бұрын
    • Imagine what they thought/felt on Scharnhorst bridge at that exact moment =D

      @Schimml0rd@Schimml0rd4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Schimml0rdBrown alert?

      @Philip271828@Philip2718283 жыл бұрын
    • @@Schimml0rd oh scheisse

      @aaronstorey9712@aaronstorey97123 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent detail of the battle as it unfolded with many really interesting technical items. Great work. Frazier’s final comments were completely in keeping with naval tradition of both navies.

    @phbrinsden@phbrinsden5 жыл бұрын
    • No doubt an excellent video but my favorite part was where the Norwegian destroyer “sailed to within 1500 yards firing with all her 420mm guns”... goddamn, the Norwegians know how to arm a destroyer lol!

      @dynamo1796@dynamo17963 жыл бұрын
  • Just about fell off my chair hearing that the Nords were shooting a 420MM gun, then I realized that he meant to read 4 120MM guns. Excellent content as always it is a highlight of my day to see and hear your work!

    @johnivkovich8655@johnivkovich86555 жыл бұрын
    • True. I thought they would capsize after one salvo, lol.

      @neilwilson5785@neilwilson57855 жыл бұрын
    • 420mm guns would capsize the destroyer by just being on it.

      @spikespa5208@spikespa52084 жыл бұрын
    • 420MM blaze it.

      @KageMinowara@KageMinowara4 жыл бұрын
    • @Marry Christmas You seem to be missing something about ship stability, the little destroyer may float with 420mm guns, but it will find itself floating upside down.

      @roryross3878@roryross38784 жыл бұрын
    • @@roryross3878 Na, they were submarine guns. Ultra secret weapon

      @Agnemons@Agnemons3 жыл бұрын
  • Just like the BISMARCK, SCHARNHORST took a tremendous beating before she finally succumbed to her battle wounds. The punishment those two ships took in their final battles is a great testament not only to the German shipbuilders sound construction, but also of the damage control department's skill. Once again Drachinifel, another accurate and thorough video. I wish someone like Peter Jackson would turn this one into a movie!

    @lloydknighten5071@lloydknighten50715 жыл бұрын
    • Illuminatiwood doesn't like White History.

      @wolfgangshrenk6032@wolfgangshrenk60325 жыл бұрын
    • Not to mencione they had to fight in the "ratio" 1 boat against 10...

      @antonioferrao4047@antonioferrao40474 жыл бұрын
    • Considering he hasn’t made a real war movie and his last effort was the Hobbit ‘trilogy’ not sure I’d back your choice of director!

      @rogerpattube@rogerpattube3 жыл бұрын
    • Imagine hero worshipping mediocre commanders and overengineered mediocrities.

      @TheNerdForAllSeasons@TheNerdForAllSeasons3 жыл бұрын
    • Scharnhorst's commander was hardly mediocre when the British honoured her after the battle.

      @aristosachaion_@aristosachaion_3 жыл бұрын
  • Mate of my Aunty worked closely with Bruce Fraser during the war. He told me few years back (both he & my Aunty still alive) that the secret to this battle was Fraser had worked on designing the guns for King George V battleships and chose exactly the right range to open fire. Battle of the North Cape then got him promoted to Adm of the British Pacific Fleet.

    @TheRex1970@TheRex19705 жыл бұрын
  • Me 2:00am PST: I should probably go to bed *new warship video* Me: ok after this

    @Sleep-is-overrated@Sleep-is-overrated5 жыл бұрын
    • 0500 EST here.

      @kyle857@kyle8575 жыл бұрын
  • Much is not known of Heroic bravery of England Navy and convoy to bring needed supply to Soviet Union. Convoys to Murmansk and Archangelsk were of immeasurable importance. Drachinifel your work is important Tovarich

    @nikolaidelchinski4412@nikolaidelchinski44123 жыл бұрын
    • This would require people accept the fact that lend lease saved the USSR from collapse

      @looinrims@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
    • @@looinrims kzhead.info/sun/aK6xgcywhnyXaI0/bejne.html

      @rachmandikalucky2775@rachmandikalucky27752 жыл бұрын
    • Да здравствует родина

      @andrewemery4272@andrewemery42722 жыл бұрын
    • @@looinrims it did not, but it was immeasurably helpful. Without it I can imagine the war on the Eastern Front lasting for another year or maybe even two. We still could have made it just by our forces alone, but it would be much much more blood and sweat to get it done. And we should really be thankful for having such allies that, despite everything, still helped us that much. Seems like Soviet/Russian historicians tend to downplay the Lend-lease importance... but the Western are exaggerating it in just the same fashion. The truth, as it often happens, is in between...

      @fear-is-a-token@fear-is-a-token2 жыл бұрын
    • @@fear-is-a-token Sorry considering how much famine was in the USSR with the west supplying some 40% of food, just for one example And all their logistics but we’ll skip that, just 40% of total foodstuffs come from the west, in a nation that was notorious for famine…pretty straight forward I would say

      @looinrims@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
  • Love that camouflage paint scheme that makes the Scharnhorst look like a much smaller ship.

    @chriscase1392@chriscase13925 жыл бұрын
  • One of my favorite Uncle Drach videos. I watch it whenever my leg is in pain, because while I'm focused on the brilliantly told story I forget my discomfort.

    @mbryson2899@mbryson28994 жыл бұрын
    • ironic cause i'm here to get my mind off troubles of my own....physical and ....losing my apartment... anyway yes Drachinifel videos are like morphine. Just as addictive too.

      @MarcStjames-rq1dm@MarcStjames-rq1dm3 жыл бұрын
    • @@MarcStjames-rq1dm I really hope your situation has improved!

      @steriskyline4470@steriskyline44702 жыл бұрын
  • Most of Scharnhorst's career was undeserving of fame and glory - as was the case with most German warships she was little more than an overengineered pirate ship in practice. But on the day of her death she fought hard and well against impossible odds, and was worthy of respect.

    @bairdrew@bairdrew5 жыл бұрын
  • This was a superb and highly detailed account of the battle and I really enjoyed it. Only thing I would add/correct is that the British Cruisers and Destroyers moved in very quickly to rescue survivors. Reports from survivors of the Scharnhorst as well as crewmen of the Sheffield and other ships estimated that between 400 and 600 men were visible in the water. Even then however, many were succumbing to the water and were freezing to death. The rough seas made rescue nearly impossible, with crewmen of the Scorpion making lassos to grab nearly frozen survivors from the water as many were too cold and weak to grab onto the nets dropped to them. The British made a very heroic and quick attempt to rescue as many as possible against horrible conditions, however minutes in a report came that U-Boats were closing on the location, so the British fleet began to pull out of the area. This report was true, though the U-Boats were almost an hour away due to the sea conditions. This lead to some controversy later on with claims that the British left many to die in the water, however many of the 36 survivors of the Scharnhorst came to the defense of their rescuers, citing the incredible friendliness and hospitality they were immediately shown. Many of the survivors had said they felt welcome amongst the British up until they were blindfolded and taken off to land. The survivors and members of the British crews would meet for decades after as friends. Again, superb video...glad I found it and subscribed.

    @ChizAfterHours@ChizAfterHours3 жыл бұрын
  • I had read about the battle before and I seem to remember watching a documentary about it. But I very much enjoyed hearing about it again. Two of my late fathers old brothers sailed on those Arctic convoys. Not a place I'd choose to be. To the best of my knowledge neither of them was torpedoed. The irony here is that my fathers eldest brother was and he was in the army on a troop ship.

    @bigblue6917@bigblue69175 жыл бұрын
    • Would it have been this one, perhaps? kzhead.info/sun/osOFhrdlrGRsoac/bejne.html

      @Trek001@Trek0013 жыл бұрын
    • There was a documentary in the 1970s featuring Admiral Sir Bruce Fraser before he died. A fantastic BBC programme from a golden age of great programme making.

      @ScienceChap@ScienceChap Жыл бұрын
  • My next to favorite last stand in naval history to learn about! A very well done addition to your channel Drachs ;) I always must bow my head in respect to Scharnhorst’s crew

    @sse_weston4138@sse_weston41385 жыл бұрын
    • Which is your favourite?

      @dobypilgrim6160@dobypilgrim61605 жыл бұрын
    • That would be the Battle of Sunda Strait between (input large number) Japanese warships and HMAS Perth and USS Houston

      @sse_weston4138@sse_weston41385 жыл бұрын
  • I can only imagine the horrific conditions the German Damage Control Teams worked to make successful repairs that restored speed more than one time and other efforts to keep the ship in fighting condition. The valiant Germans crewing Scharnhorst are on Eternal Patrol. Respects.

    @mikegallegos7@mikegallegos75 жыл бұрын
    • For a second I read that as "Eternal Petrol"

      @ThatSlowTypingGuy@ThatSlowTypingGuy4 жыл бұрын
    • Respect for the brave seamen, regardless of nation, who fought bravely to the last? Yes. Even the Japanese, who were known for their cruel, brutal treatment of prisoners, at times saluted a fallen foe who had fought with honour by their reckoning.

      @kieranh2005@kieranh20054 жыл бұрын
    • @@realpatriot1553 who are you atifa crap that no one likes sorry dude sailors understand one another even in war the sea teaches you but you will never now .

      @peterwolf8395@peterwolf83954 жыл бұрын
    • @@kieranh2005 I'm sorry, but I just can't respect any of the japanese armed forces in ww2.

      @sheeplord4976@sheeplord49764 жыл бұрын
    • @@peterwolf8395 Fuck off, Nazi

      @mrboatface4023@mrboatface40234 жыл бұрын
  • Without a doubt, the best description of a WW2 naval engagement I've seen. Thank you.

    @charlesrichardson3860@charlesrichardson38605 жыл бұрын
  • Best analysis of North Cape sea battle ever! Thank you so much! Better balance (not pro-British) description of this great battle, describing, in detail, the over whelming odds Scharnhorst was facing. She was brave, well led, and rose to the legendary level of her namesake, from WW 1 fame!

    @davidabney7700@davidabney77004 жыл бұрын
    • Fighting for a lost cause was never a recipe for victory and Germany was never a maritime nation so why did they think they could win when all the shipping they had went to the bottom eventually.......a typical case of mismanagement and lack of understanding of the need to have the right gear at the right time and plenty of it too. In reality, it was the entry of the USA into the war, not once but on two occasions, that sealed the German's fate,........some people never learn?........ no matter how loud the trumpets blew for the Allies.

      @gangleweed@gangleweed3 жыл бұрын
    • @@gangleweed They weren´t fighting for a lost cause. I am pretty sure, that with having the treaty of versailles in mind, they thought that this time Germany wouldn´t survive as a nation, if they will lose the war.

      @Bazgatow87@Bazgatow872 жыл бұрын
    • @@Bazgatow87 Misled and misinformed, if that isn't a recipe for a lost cause I don't know what is.........that was the German problem all over........it's been 75 + years since 1945 when Germany finally bit the bullet and became more peaceful instead of wanting to rule by a might is right and absolute sacrifice mentality that got them nowhere.

      @gangleweed@gangleweed2 жыл бұрын
    • @@gangleweed Dear Ian, I do not know you personally, you will surely be a nice guy and I do not want to hurt you in any way. But, as an elder German with some knowledge on our and our neighbours history I am wondering what your strange judgements and conclusions about Germans and Germany are based on?

      @christianermecke9941@christianermecke99412 жыл бұрын
    • @@christianermecke9941 Yes, the war made many people bitter and full of sorrow for their losses......we only ever see out own loss, being a Brtit, as we are of the opinion that we were attacked and therefore had to defend to the utmost against the "Hun"......whatever.........deep wounds heal the slowest and the loss of friends and relatives no matter which side you subscribe to only makes you have bad feelings for the opponent no matter how hard they fought or were brave in doing so. History does have a way of giving reasons for any act no matter the outcome.....we are all Human and tend to interpret History in our own way.

      @gangleweed@gangleweed2 жыл бұрын
  • You made a passing mention of good ol “bare hands bates” repairing Duke of York’s radar by splicing its wires back together. Or as popular belief puts it: “Holding the ends together with his bare hands!” Great job telling this and other stories from WW1 and WW2! I’m definitely subscribing!

    @danieljones7843@danieljones78433 жыл бұрын
  • Very accurate commentary on North Cape sea battle, supported by photos, art work, and diagrams. Great job here! Surely the spirits of WW1 German sailors of SMS Scharnhorst SMS Gnesienau, and SMS Blucher were on board WW2 Scharnhorst that fateful day at North Cape. Admiral Fraser honored the "fighting spirit" of the sailors, command staff, and Admiral Bey of Scharnhorst at battles conclusion. This German WW2 battlecruiser crew honored their predecessors, with their bravery, under impossible combat conditions. Thanks again for this well done video of North Cape!

    @davidabney7700@davidabney77005 жыл бұрын
    • If the spirits of the WW1 sailors were on board during the WW2 battle, then it must've sucked having to be sunk for a second time.

      @HappyFlapps@HappyFlapps4 жыл бұрын
    • WWII German/NAZI warships did not have or use SMS.... Just names, SMS would be WWI Imperial German warships. Kaiser Wilhelm II, just a little disgraced.... Germany being a little faster then England. But having less direction(a national compass might help, a common problem in all of Europe[France, Spain.....] and any where the media standards are low[Canada,U.S.A., Mexico).

      @knutdergroe9757@knutdergroe97574 жыл бұрын
    • @@knutdergroe9757 He means that the spirits of the WW1 ships SMS Scharnhorst, SMS Gneisenau and SMS Blücher, who all went down fighting, were with their WW2 sister as she met her fate

      @535phobos@535phobos3 жыл бұрын
    • @@knutdergroe9757 I appreciate that English may not be your first language, but the OP was referring to the Scharnhorst, Gneisenau and Blucher of the Imperial German Navy

      @ThePhoenix198@ThePhoenix1982 жыл бұрын
  • I have worked at sea off the north cape, out of Hammerfest and Kirkeness. I shudder to imagine the difficulties and sacrifices of the men involved in battle in these waters.

    @freddieclark@freddieclark5 жыл бұрын
  • 32:42 "blasting away with its four hundred-twenty millimeter guns" had to listen to that one twice :D

    @namewarvergeben@namewarvergeben5 жыл бұрын
    • Same

      @roryross3878@roryross38784 жыл бұрын
    • its 4 x 120mm

      @gavin2144@gavin21444 жыл бұрын
    • What's wrong with 4.7 inch?

      @melvillesperryn9268@melvillesperryn92683 жыл бұрын
    • @@gavin2144 thanks that clears it up

      @ilfarmboy@ilfarmboy3 жыл бұрын
    • @@ilfarmboy To be comprehensive - Wikipedia: The ship was armed with four 45-calibre 4.7-inch (120 mm) Mark XII guns in dual-purpose mounts. For anti-aircraft (AA) defence, had one twin mount for Bofors 40 mm gunsand four twin 20-millimetre (0.8 in) Oerlikon autocannon. She was fitted with two above-water quadruple mounts for 21-inch (533 mm) torpedoes. Two depth charge rails and four throwers were fitted for which 70 depth charges were provided.

      @sallykoep@sallykoep3 жыл бұрын
  • I thought you covered this very well. If I may suggest a way of improving the supporting graphics - you exposed the total surface plot timeline right from the get go. It would be easier for the viewer to assimilate all the information if the plot was ‘revealed and updated’ at each of the key stages of the battle you are explaining.

    @normanboyes4983@normanboyes49835 жыл бұрын
    • Good point

      @Drachinifel@Drachinifel5 жыл бұрын
    • I very much agree. Even pausing to try to sort out the maps, it was hard to follow at times. Also, time stamps in the narration don't necessarily correspond to the ones indicated on the map. It's possible to interpolate between waypoints, but these details would make an excellent video all the better!

      @MendTheWorld@MendTheWorld5 жыл бұрын
    • Agreed. The surface plot was often more confusing than helpful. Better visuals would improve the narrative immensely.

      @eggyolknyc@eggyolknyc5 жыл бұрын
    • Especially tough as the exact timestamps aren't on the plots. Interpolating positions as you talk doesn't make for easy viewing. Tracing them out to would add a lot. It would also make for a more compelling narrative if we can't see what's coming.

      @mostevil1082@mostevil10825 жыл бұрын
    • @@mostevil1082 *Sunk* was a spoiler for you?!

      @roryross3878@roryross38784 жыл бұрын
  • "I'm a shell, I'm a shell. It's so boring being a shell." BANG!, "Weeeeee! Oh! What's That? It's a ship! I wonder if it'll be friends with me?....

    @aluminumfence@aluminumfence5 жыл бұрын
    • 🤣lol

      @WALTERBROADDUS@WALTERBROADDUS5 жыл бұрын
    • BOOM!

      @arnavkalgutkar6169@arnavkalgutkar61695 жыл бұрын
    • You've been reading John Ringo.

      @readhistory2023@readhistory20235 жыл бұрын
    • @@readhistory2023 It was more like Drach meets Douglas Adams.

      @aluminumfence@aluminumfence5 жыл бұрын
    • I pictured that with a cute, high-pitched voice

      @HaydenLau.@HaydenLau.5 жыл бұрын
  • A wonderful first person account is by A. G. F. Ditcham in “ A Home on the Rolling Main.” As Director Officer on HMS Scorpion, he scored a four hit first salvo at near point blank range. His ship picked up the few survivors. He also saw his exact counterpart position on HMS Saumarez wiped out when that ship’s director tower was smashed by Scharnhorst. A good read throughout.

    @billbrockman779@billbrockman7795 жыл бұрын
    • TY for the book reference

      @davidluck1678@davidluck16783 жыл бұрын
    • Tony used to come to the Joint Staff College to tell us about North Cape. You could hear a pin drop. As i hsppens I spoke with him this morning (26/2/21).

      @cascades17@cascades173 жыл бұрын
    • I might add that the radar operator in Scorpion 'saw' Scharnhorst sink by watching her radar echo diminish and then disappear. He reported her sunk to the bridge and was asked "how do you know?"

      @cascades17@cascades173 жыл бұрын
  • Great picture at 5:08 showing how camouflage can make a ship look much shorter/smaller visually. Excellent content as usual and especialy appreciate all the old naval pics and videos that you find and stitche together. Well done!

    @qtig9490@qtig94903 жыл бұрын
    • Probably intended to make her look like a Hipper class cruiser. The lack of a 4th turret would be a give away, but might not be obvious from a distance. HMS Norfolk had something similar done to her hull in 1940.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70333 жыл бұрын
  • Every time I see pics of a ship covered in ice, all I think is how miserable it had to be for the crews.

    @CSSVirginia@CSSVirginia5 жыл бұрын
    • Maybe not were the crew thi king they were lucky not to be in that frozen sea death in minutes

      @ericloeschmann3258@ericloeschmann32585 жыл бұрын
    • @@ericloeschmann3258 On the contrary, the crews on ships operating in these water had to constantly brave the weather on deck to remove the ice, as gone unchecked the weight of the ice could've caused the ship to capsize.

      @fishbmw@fishbmw5 жыл бұрын
    • Braving the weather was not braving the freezing sea if they fell in or ship sunk death in.minutes

      @ericloeschmann3258@ericloeschmann32585 жыл бұрын
    • @@fishbmw braving the weather wasn't deadly braving the freezing sea if ship sunk of crew fell in was deadly there is a difference

      @ericloeschmann3258@ericloeschmann32585 жыл бұрын
    • @@ericloeschmann3258 yeah cleaning off deck ice in gale winds on a heaving ice covered deck isn't tricky at all.

      @purplefood1@purplefood15 жыл бұрын
  • Another excellent video of an iconic naval battle. I've always found the Scharnhorst to be the prettiest fighting ship ever BTW. In a way, the battle shows how surprisingly delicate these huge capital ships can be: a golden bb from Bismarck unexpectedly one-shotted the hood, another golden bb knocked out Scharnhorst's radar right at the opening of the engagement, putting her in a huge disadvantage.

    @ErdenizS@ErdenizS5 жыл бұрын
    • And the British battlecruisers at Jutland in 1916. The losses were appalling. It was poor ammo discipline apparently.

      @neilwilson5785@neilwilson57855 жыл бұрын
    • @@Arthion With Scharnhorst''s radar out, she blundered straight into HMS Duke of York.

      @Wombat1916@Wombat19165 жыл бұрын
  • Great to hear my fathers ship (HMS Savage) mentioned in this action.

    @ianthomas1959@ianthomas19593 жыл бұрын
  • The lads on both sides had such big balls that putting their trousers on must had been tricky. RIP to all lost, I salute you. Ric

    @riccapucho@riccapucho3 жыл бұрын
  • Amazing work!... “You” need to do a warships version of “Inside the Chieftains hatch” where they film you exploring various historical warships whilst revealing their history, weaponry, inner and outer workings, displacement etc. In fact maybe you should approach the “World of Warships” people with a short demo video in that format? I know I would watch!

    @MrWhiskers65@MrWhiskers654 жыл бұрын
    • Will he do a "by jove the ship is sinking" segment?

      @jeffreyskoritowski4114@jeffreyskoritowski41144 жыл бұрын
  • Love the thumbnail picture of Duke of York ploughing through heavy seas swathed in cordite smoke.

    @phbrinsden@phbrinsden5 жыл бұрын
  • May I suggest the County Class Cruisers of the Royal Navy would be a good one to cover. Also, the CVE carriers served an important function in both the Atlantic and Pacific. Covering one of the major classes would be another good choice.

    @scottgiles7546@scottgiles75465 жыл бұрын
    • HMAS Australia would be a great ship of the class to cover. Operated in all theatres of the war and I believe was the last to meet the breakers torch.

      @nnoddy8161@nnoddy81615 жыл бұрын
    • @@nnoddy8161 As did the HMS/HMAS Shropshire 500000 nautical miles travelled, 19 battles and only lost 6 men in 6 years all to accidents

      @jacktattis143@jacktattis1434 жыл бұрын
  • Love this sort of content! And you sound much better this week lol

    @DMac12flyers@DMac12flyers5 жыл бұрын
  • THANK YOU for these great battle descriptions. These are as good as any TV documentary: awesome writing and great delivery. I love these!

    @Senor0Droolcup@Senor0Droolcup4 жыл бұрын
  • These battle reports are possibly my favorite of your content. Good job!

    @justinarchibald3857@justinarchibald38575 жыл бұрын
  • You’re narration made this battle come alive-thank you👍

    @linnharamis1496@linnharamis14964 жыл бұрын
  • I love these posts - as My late father was on the Arctic convoys aboard HMCS Haida .

    @shawnfoxfirth9684@shawnfoxfirth96845 жыл бұрын
    • HMCS Haida is a popular boat in WoWs.

      @joselitostotomas8114@joselitostotomas81145 жыл бұрын
    • I'll have to look into this WoWs - Back in the mid '70s My Dad Sternly corrected a Naval Cadet that was giving us a tour of the Haida , well the young Cadet referred to her as a Boat my dad pointed to a skiff and said "Thats A Boat This is A Ship" .

      @shawnfoxfirth9684@shawnfoxfirth96845 жыл бұрын
    • @@shawnfoxfirth9684 I spend many hours on the Haida pretending I was her captain. WOWS is world of warships in case you needed the know. The in game Haida is ok but wargaming made her a ship that sits in a smoke screen hiding while firing her guns and torpedoes and is weaker then the British tribals. I for one am disappointed on how war gaming made her.

      @Peorhum@Peorhum5 жыл бұрын
    • She was Anything but weak - Known as a Lucky Ship with a Bold Capt - Henry George 'Harry' Dewolf known to his men as 'Hard Over Harry'. Capt Dewolf came over from the River class Destroyer the HMCS St Laurent My late father served under him on both ships the whole war . The Haida is the Most Decorated Ship in the RCN .

      @shawnfoxfirth9684@shawnfoxfirth96845 жыл бұрын
    • @@shawnfoxfirth9684 My grandfather, on my mother's side was on the Saguenay and later the Goderich during the war. My father tried to join the Cdn army with his friends but had health issues so was rejected. He was send to make universal carriers in Windsor instead. His friends were all killed at Dieppe and shortly before he passed away, I found out he had survivor's guilt for not dying with his friends he tried to join with.

      @Peorhum@Peorhum5 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for this. I've read a lot about this action but appreciate the minute by minute detail.

    @barrylloyd4109@barrylloyd41092 жыл бұрын
  • Well explained, with background context too, thanks

    @richardsleep2045@richardsleep20455 жыл бұрын
  • ma boi drach has uploaded again, now my day is 10x better

    @sarpkaplan4449@sarpkaplan44495 жыл бұрын
  • I've read descriptions of this battle in books that took me less time than this video-and this video is MUCH better. Great work!

    @xylomeat9913@xylomeat99135 жыл бұрын
  • “The convoy are starting up in earnest and Admiral Donuts asks permission for a cup of coffee.” I love the humor of the captions generators.

    @davidoltmans2725@davidoltmans27253 жыл бұрын
  • Great story, magnificently detailed. Thank you so much.

    @charlesclager6808@charlesclager68083 жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely a great video

    @scottoeltjendiers6007@scottoeltjendiers60075 жыл бұрын
  • Not much out there on the Battle of North Cape. Appreciate this great breakdown.

    @ljfisher21@ljfisher215 жыл бұрын
  • Another great video! Informative and well researched.

    @michaelbriggs5503@michaelbriggs55035 жыл бұрын
  • Many years ago, I saw this newsreel, after the Scharnhorst was sunk, I saw Sir Bruce, stopping his ship near the sinking site of the Scharnhorst, and he dropped a wreath. Has anyone else seen this? Best wishes.

    @oldcity1954@oldcity19544 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you! A very sombre end note, well worthy of gallant seamen and a reminder to us all; in the end we are all brothers in arms.

    @N0rdman@N0rdman5 жыл бұрын
  • My late Father George Firth V-4923 served in the RCN aboard the HMCS St laurent and then the new HMCS Haida , He was on the Arctic Convoys to Murmansk and Arc Angelsk .

    @shawnfoxfirth9684@shawnfoxfirth96845 жыл бұрын
  • The account of the battle was thrilling, and the final comment about Scharnhorst very touching. Bravo!

    @16denier@16denier5 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the video chap - it was worth the wait.

    @EdGeyy@EdGeyy5 жыл бұрын
  • This is a great channel. Glad I subscribed!⚓️U.S. NAVY Boiler technician 1980 to 1984.

    @bryantcurtis2665@bryantcurtis26653 жыл бұрын
  • Oh how the Germans love sending their ships on lonely adventures

    @penkagenova7073@penkagenova70733 жыл бұрын
    • They are surrounded,cannot break wind without a neighbor's nose up in the air. A minor jaunt,was an adventure for them.

      @aldenunion@aldenunion3 жыл бұрын
    • Why didn't they put task forces together with their big units like bizmark, tirpitz and a few heavy cruisers instead of sending out lone sorties

      @bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith243 жыл бұрын
    • @@bobbyrayofthefamilysmith24 They tried doing that a few times. Bismarck and Prinz Eugen were supposed to be part of a larger force that included Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, but those 2 were in Brest and were being bombed to hell so they decided to leave without them. They couldn't send light ships into the Atlantic because they didn't have enough range.

      @roborovskihamster5425@roborovskihamster54253 жыл бұрын
    • As they didn't have a lot of them that was the only option..

      @ulfpe@ulfpe3 жыл бұрын
    • It’s not like the had enough ships to send them in groups

      @notoriousblt1038@notoriousblt10383 жыл бұрын
  • Really great vid, its the in depth explanation of this battle i have always wanted.

    @ArenBerberian@ArenBerberian5 жыл бұрын
  • The artwork used in this video is superb for both the photographic and especially the illustration work. Kudos to Drachinifel for having the keen eye and good taste to chose these images! Personally I prefer hand drawn illustrations over cga/cgi and these are as good as they come.

    @shadroid@shadroid3 жыл бұрын
  • Never underestimate the power of Radar in battle.

    @titanicww2345@titanicww23455 жыл бұрын
  • Great video Drach and I'm glad to hear you sound much better, Tgose pictures of ship covered in ice and snow were chilling. It showed just how harsh and tough a place the Artic Ocean is in winter and how dangerous it was to run convoys to Russia in such conditions. THe biggest danger seemed to be the build up of ice on a ship wich could jam vital equipment and maybe even capsize a ship if left unchecked. The crews on both sides fought bravely in appalling conditions in proved that the Battleship still had a role to play. A Carrier would have been useless in this situation.

    @johnfisher9692@johnfisher96925 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for another great presentation.

    @niclasjohansson4333@niclasjohansson43335 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent documentary. Well done sir. Keep up the good work!

    @billycanas1582@billycanas15825 жыл бұрын
  • From my understanding from watching a documentary about the battle was that Duke of York's salvoes got increasingly effective the further away Scharnhorst got as the angle of impact changed from hits impacting the horizontal belt armor to relatively minor effect to plunging straight through the thinner deck and dealing crippling damage

    @Arthion@Arthion5 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah german ship armour was very effective on closer ranges. Just look at the Bsimarck that got blown to shits but its armored belt remained basically intact so it was sunk by scutteling. The citadel and generally the upper part of the ship were blown to utter shits though.

      @noobster4779@noobster47792 жыл бұрын
  • 24:47, i think thats a nelson class ship going by the superstructure and the 2 turrets with 3 guns, you can see a horizontal gun in the loading position on turret B.

    @cbennetts2746@cbennetts27464 жыл бұрын
  • I enjoy going back and listening to Drach’s old videos. I’ve lost count how many times I’ve listened to this one.

    @DardanellesBy108@DardanellesBy1083 ай бұрын
  • I always love your videos and the work you put into them. Keep it up sir.

    @admiraltiberius1989@admiraltiberius19895 жыл бұрын
  • I really enjoyed that one Drac, The first sea battle I ever read about at I'd be about 11 years old.

    @davidrobinson4553@davidrobinson45535 жыл бұрын
  • 32:30 Three cheers for the Norwegians!

    @lamonstra1464@lamonstra14645 жыл бұрын
    • Oh yes they did not like the Germans

      @jacktattis143@jacktattis1434 жыл бұрын
    • @Golden Eagle Four 120 mm guns.

      @gunnar6674@gunnar66744 жыл бұрын
    • Hip hip

      @aaronstorey9712@aaronstorey97124 жыл бұрын
    • @@jacktattis143 Not entirely surprising given that their homeland had been occupied by the Germans for over three and a half years by this point.

      @ThePhoenix198@ThePhoenix1982 жыл бұрын
  • This was actually one of the better navy stories. Watched it twice now, thanks.

    @altatude9677@altatude96774 жыл бұрын
  • An excellent and informative video. Thank you.

    @morriganravenchild6613@morriganravenchild66135 жыл бұрын
  • You don't mention the crucial role played by "ULTRA" in the battle. Admirals Fraser and Burnett were both "in the club" so they had up to date info on Scharnhorst's intentions when Bey reported to group west. The German destroyers were detached because they couldn't keep up with Scharnhorst in the prevailing weather without taking serious damage. Up until that point, Scharnhorst was considered a lucky ship. It's such a shame that these magnificent ships have to be destroyed with the loss of so many brave men.

    @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars@PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars5 жыл бұрын
    • Poor leadership from the top and poor support doomed these ships to death

      @charlesfollette2655@charlesfollette26554 жыл бұрын
    • These are fighting ships and fighting men. Both win or die, that's war. We preserve our USN vessels as a testament to the men who fought and died on them and their peers. They are not museums for to us enjoy, they are memorials.

      @toomanyhobbies2011@toomanyhobbies20113 жыл бұрын
    • Not a shame, Hitler's navy belonged at the bottom of the ocean.

      @1599maybole@1599maybole2 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for this summary of Battle of North Cape. As far as I remember I have read somewhere that the Luftwaffe actually spotted Adm Fraser's task force on Eastbound, however the information was not, for some reason, transferred to Adm Eric Bey. If this had been known it is far from certain that Scharnhorst would go to sea.

    @eplekake3870@eplekake38705 жыл бұрын
  • Fantastic piece sir, well done.

    @stevefriswell5422@stevefriswell54223 жыл бұрын
  • MY OPINION: YOUR verbal explanation is/was OUTSTANDING!! (I LOVED your subtle humor!). THANKS! VERY GOOD! 👍👍

    @alvashoemaker8536@alvashoemaker853610 ай бұрын
  • Excellent vid as usual. Always felt sorry for the German surface navy; Hitler gave them the ultimate hospital pass, as one might say in rugby. The point about radar is crucial. I think people overlook just how decisive the advantage in radar enjoyed by the UK and USA forces, particularly airborne in the case of the Atlantic and surface and air search in the case of USN submarines. I believe Scharnhorst's Captain almost made it to safety, but was unable to hold to an upturned life boat long enough to be retrieved. At least the seemingly out of place sense of chivalry never quite died in naval combat. Once the ship was destroyed, naval personnel quickly turned to the matter of rescuing fellow seamen regardless of nationality. Cheers p.s. phonetically it's not "Fore-Castle", it's "Folk-Sell".

    @steeltrap3800@steeltrap38005 жыл бұрын
  • Outstanding analysis, commentary and review of this naval engagement. Your skill would well benefit any Naval Academy in the world. God Save the Queen and God Bless the United States of America.

    @barbieann2836@barbieann28362 жыл бұрын
  • Watched this on my lunch break today sitting directly opposite the HMS Belfast down on the south bank near London Bridge, fantastic content will definitely be returning to the channel.

    @Roteyes@Roteyes2 жыл бұрын
  • Many thanks a fantastic video and telling of this amazing battle

    @daveelliott5855@daveelliott58554 жыл бұрын
  • 34:25 Truly noble sentiments expressed by the Admiral.

    @MikeB071@MikeB0714 жыл бұрын
  • I knew a man who served as a Commander on HMCS Iroquois, (I think), on the Murmansk run. Every winter he would rub his hands and express his hatred for the cold. He said he'd received a lifetimes worth of it during the war. He died around 1993.

    @Lord.Kiltridge@Lord.Kiltridge5 жыл бұрын
  • Yet another excellent video, much enjoyed, thanks very much.

    @adamskinner5868@adamskinner58684 жыл бұрын
  • Great descriptions of what went on, sounds unreal.

    @seeingeyegod@seeingeyegod5 жыл бұрын
  • At 25:00 the name of the Lieutenant that climbed the mast, PLEASE. The names of heroes should always be used.

    @leebenson4874@leebenson48745 жыл бұрын
  • Absolutely awesome episode. Well done. Do we know to what extent Blenchley Park played in Fraser anticipating the Kriegsmarines attack? 24:22 - Nelson Class battleship image has snuck into the battle???

    @nnoddy8161@nnoddy81615 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you Drauq as most essays on the Scharnhorst class couldn’t distinguish between the two. With the main mast for Scharnhorst was back on the rear upper deck where the Gneisenau mast was on her funnel. Your the man !!!

    @alexlupsor5484@alexlupsor5484Ай бұрын
  • Great content! Congratz i wil eventualy watch every single one of your vids

    @luisfernandotrenoritaferre3356@luisfernandotrenoritaferre33565 жыл бұрын
  • A 14 inch star shell sounds phenomenal. They would be amazing to use in a New Year's Eve fireworks display!

    @hobmoor2042@hobmoor20424 жыл бұрын
    • I think there is one 14” barrel left, at Fort Nelson near Portsmouth.

      @mebsrea@mebsrea3 жыл бұрын
    • We can do better than that, use the 15" guns outside the Imperial War Museum!

      @chrisoddy8744@chrisoddy87442 жыл бұрын
  • Really sick and twisted leadership/government them Germans had during WW2, but oh boy, did they build themselves some absolutely beautiful warships.

    @HappyFlapps@HappyFlapps4 жыл бұрын
    • And we sank them. British sailors"heart of Oak"

      @willhenry5385@willhenry53853 жыл бұрын
    • 6------to--------1 Always sent them out in low number or alone.

      @aldenunion@aldenunion3 жыл бұрын
    • Not really much choice in that. When you're facing down the RN after having to build your navy in 20 years basically from scratch, you can't really invest your entire force to one major battle that you would definitely lose.

      @charlesbechen821@charlesbechen8213 жыл бұрын
  • Keep these videos coming! I really enjoy them

    @Militaria_Collector@Militaria_Collector4 жыл бұрын
  • Best thumbnail pic of all. Just awesome.

    @phbrinsden@phbrinsden4 жыл бұрын
KZhead