Channel Dash by Battleship Scharnhorst & Gneisenau 1942 Animated

2022 ж. 3 Сәу.
960 884 Рет қаралды

The Channel Dash of 1942, also known as Operation Cerberus, was a daring and successful naval operation by the German Navy during World War II. The operation involved the evacuation of three powerful German warships, the battleships Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, and the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen, from their base in Brest, France, to Germany.
The Channel Dash was a significant achievement for the Germans, as it allowed them to avoid being trapped in Brest by the British Royal Navy. The operation began on February 11, 1942, when the German ships slipped out of the harbor and made their way through the English Channel, with the support of Luftwaffe bombers and fighters.
In conclusion, the Channel Dash of 1942 was a significant event in the history of World War II. It demonstrated the effectiveness of German naval tactics and equipment, and had important psychological effects on both the German and British militaries. The operation also had significant strategic implications, as it allowed the Germans to reposition their naval assets and better defend against the British blockade.
Animation, Directed and Produced by: The Warline

Пікірлер
  • This channel has 600 subscribers? it should be in the millions range. What an incredibly well put together video.

    @derekweiland1857@derekweiland18572 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
    • No Kidding!

      @tfs203@tfs2032 жыл бұрын
    • Probably cose there are other, older and vastly popular (and in some aspect better) videos about those topics. About Channel Dash specificly there are great videos by Operation Room and BuzBattles. Btw, this one look suspiciously symilar to Buz's one.

      @wardasz@wardasz Жыл бұрын
    • why illegals don't care about gringo

      @onlythewise1@onlythewise1 Жыл бұрын
    • Yes, very high effort videos

      @emretasdemir8028@emretasdemir8028 Жыл бұрын
  • The British submarine Sealy-un!?! It's Sea-Lion!

    @ronnelson7828@ronnelson7828 Жыл бұрын
    • Ya, and Boulogne isn't Bologna either!

      @wahwahweewa@wahwahweewa Жыл бұрын
    • Tee-Pits...no it's pronounced Tur-puhts

      @NeedlessPedantics@NeedlessPedantics Жыл бұрын
    • Wow, boys - calm down. - Here to add to these pronunciation critiques: quality video, presenting a very accessible explanation of this thrilling wartime episode. Good script and graphics.

      @AndrewGivens@AndrewGivens Жыл бұрын
    • Frisian was another one

      @Muesli711@Muesli7116 ай бұрын
    • AI innit.

      @davefb@davefb5 ай бұрын
  • Just been recommended by histograph channel , good video.

    @dwaynehicks6838@dwaynehicks68382 жыл бұрын
    • Same here! Found this channel that way too. Made sure to subscribe. Looking forward to future videos!

      @ChaosMongrel@ChaosMongrel2 жыл бұрын
  • I was already very familiar with this operation so I actually came here to check the quality of the video and find out if it was worth subscribing. Let's just say I was so pleased with the quality, I watched it to the very end despite knowing the entire story already. Subscriber count: +1

    @kevin9392@kevin93922 жыл бұрын
    • Seconded.

      @DidMyGrandfatherMakeThis@DidMyGrandfatherMakeThis2 жыл бұрын
    • Was there not somekind of duel between British and German coastal artillery?

      @juhopuhakka2351@juhopuhakka2351 Жыл бұрын
    • The top commentor approves.

      @rudolphguarnacci197@rudolphguarnacci1975 ай бұрын
  • Here to make a shoutout to Historigraph for showing Your channel. Much respect for You and Your work! Very enjoyable and a wonderful job done! Instant subscriber.

    @viesturslevada8554@viesturslevada85542 жыл бұрын
  • I love this mission. It was so bold, mad and straight to the point. Plus succeeded.

    @MALITH666@MALITH666 Жыл бұрын
    • Indeed. A successful strategic calamity for the Germans, effectively signalling the end of their surface fleet as a relevant factor in the war.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dovetonsturdee7033 It was ending anyway. Germany was running out of fuel therefore Naval fleet was always on the clock. Plus US comiting to carriers fully broke/changed Naval warfare and rendered all these fleets useless.

      @MALITH666@MALITH666 Жыл бұрын
    • @@MALITH666 'Plus US comiting to carriers fully broke/changed Naval warfare and rendered all these fleets useless.' Really? Perhaps you might explain the importance of US carriers in the naval war against Germany?

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dovetonsturdee7033 They didnt have to. Its a case of 'even if Germany managed to have a surface fleet'. American partners, the British, succesfully did that with their fleet air arm. Which is the prelude for the this mission. 1940 aircrafts were far too great deterrent than the biggest battleship.

      @MALITH666@MALITH666 Жыл бұрын
    • @@MALITH666 Which German warships, or come to that Italian warships, were either sunk, or even crippled, by Fleet Air Arm aircraft?

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
  • Came here from historiograph!

    @luxin6235@luxin62352 жыл бұрын
  • This channel needs far more exposure + appreciation!

    @tfs203@tfs2032 жыл бұрын
  • I love the history of battleships. Respect for all the captains regardless of nation or reasoning. Absolutely amazing marvels of war technology.

    @jonathonparker1532@jonathonparker15329 ай бұрын
  • Wow! That WW2 must've been terrifying for all those involved. I'm just glad no one got hurt.

    @moistmike4150@moistmike4150 Жыл бұрын
    • Nope, no casualties during the whole war!

      @melangellatc1718@melangellatc17187 ай бұрын
  • This is terrific. The channel dash was always one of my favorite world war maneuvers

    @davidasher8718@davidasher87186 ай бұрын
  • I love the video but I spotted that your map may be more recent because of the coastline of the Netherlands. Keep up the good work!

    @TheInternetBanana@TheInternetBanana2 жыл бұрын
  • Your back! I’m so glad. I hope you do get more recognition.

    @legallyblind393@legallyblind3932 жыл бұрын
    • thank you for your support..

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • I was reading a biography of Nelson in shop where Commander Fanning came in. Happy to see some one interested in Naval History he offered his copies of Nelsons letters for me to read. I was told after he left that he had been awarded the D.S.C. Commander Fanning returned with a huge book and I asked about his medal. He said that he had been a navigator whilst chasing the Prince Eugene and Gneisenau and that the government had dished out some medals and his name was pulled out of hat to recieve a medal. When you think of the responsibility of of these young men, I feel very humble.

    @marksingleton7199@marksingleton7199 Жыл бұрын
    • No disrespect to him and there's no doubt he deserved it but he was telling the truth. I met a man who saw out the war as a mess waiter with a regiment in Italy. It was not a high flying job but in his position he saw and heard just about everything. He said after major battle they got a list of decorations to be awarded and in one case they passed the job to a Major who awarded himself the D S O.

      @freebeerfordworkers@freebeerfordworkers10 ай бұрын
    • @@freebeerfordworkers I understand. Yet he navigated a flotilla of ships and therefore had thousands of lives to look after. One of those very young men who took on huge responsibility. I respect them all.

      @marksingleton7199@marksingleton719910 ай бұрын
    • Hi there, just to be precise: The name of the ship was >Prinz Eugen< .

      @kulturfreund6631@kulturfreund66315 ай бұрын
  • So happy I found this channel by accident, keep up the good work! Can’t wait to watch more of your videos!

    @ethanchang6417@ethanchang64172 жыл бұрын
  • Found this channel by accident, but I’m glad I did. Great story telling and animation.

    @Docwilson91@Docwilson912 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for drawing our attention to this excellent account of the Channel dash👍

    @hisdadjames4876@hisdadjames48762 жыл бұрын
  • This is the most underrated channel ever, good luck man, earned a sub :)

    @Itz_Shadow66@Itz_Shadow66 Жыл бұрын
  • A couple of years later it would just have been another trip for 617 Squadron and their Tallboys.

    @chrisst8922@chrisst8922 Жыл бұрын
  • Incredible content. waiting impatiently for more.(thanks historygraph)

    @ethical3429@ethical34292 жыл бұрын
  • This was really good, I thoroughly enjoyed it!

    @HoH@HoH Жыл бұрын
    • I'm glad you enjoyed it

      @TheWarline@TheWarline Жыл бұрын
  • What a good coordination and plan by the kriegmarine and the Luftwaffe, their dedication is commendable!

    @charlesfrancis6925@charlesfrancis69259 ай бұрын
  • Came here by recommendation.good video,hats off

    @chkoha6462@chkoha64622 жыл бұрын
  • Kenneth Campbell and his 3 crewmen perished in the attack on Gneisenau, but he and his crew's bravery put Gneisenau out of action for many months in which it might have wreaked havoc on British convoys. God bless the brave men of the RAF and RNAF.

    @moistmike4150@moistmike4150 Жыл бұрын
    • every goddamn pilot/crew was a knucklehead within that airforce

      @kalebjames1953@kalebjames195311 ай бұрын
    • He was posthumously awarded the Victoria Cross for his actions.

      @Muesli711@Muesli7116 ай бұрын
  • Well done and informative, thank-you.

    @R.U.1.2.@R.U.1.2. Жыл бұрын
  • Prinz Eugen was a lucky ship that survived the war. It was destroyed in a post-war atomic bomb test.

    @parthin@parthin Жыл бұрын
    • Two nuclear bombs, and Prinz Eugen is still partially above water.

      @mattg432@mattg4326 ай бұрын
    • No, it wasn't, because nukes don't exist.

      @swervsplatt9672@swervsplatt96726 ай бұрын
    • I don't care what you memorized from school, or what you watched on TV. Because that's all you have for proof.

      @swervsplatt9672@swervsplatt96726 ай бұрын
  • Your last 2 videos, phenomenal. You've found your mix. Keep up the good work.

    @danieltraverso3940@danieltraverso3940 Жыл бұрын
    • Thank you very much!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline Жыл бұрын
  • Lovely narration and animation, and I honestly applaud your approach of butchering French, English and German city and ship names alike.

    @novacolonel5287@novacolonel5287 Жыл бұрын
    • I actually think the pronunciation was quite good. Except maybe for the city of Wilhelmshaven, which sounded like "Wilhelmshown". I suppose this is an artificial computer generated voice. Maybe it's programmed or follows the name "Copenhagen" as a role model, which in Danish is written "København" and pronounced "Koebenhown". The V in Wilhelmshaven (literally: Williamsport /Williamshaven) is pronounced as F. Side note: The V in German and Dutch words and names of Germanic origin is pronounced as F . Examples: Vater (father), Vogel (bird), vier (four), vorbei (over, past), Volk (people, the people, folk), Hannover (Hanover), von Bismarck, van Beethoven, Amstelveen (Dutch town), Bremerhaven (coastal city, port of Bremen) ... Whereas the V in German words of Latin/Romance origin is pronounced as V. Like: Variation (variation), violett (violet), Vibration, Viktor/Viktoria (personal names), Vakanz (vacancy), Lavendel (lavender) etc.

      @kulturfreund6631@kulturfreund66315 ай бұрын
  • What a great video. This chanell will blow up for sure

    @koppo9172@koppo91725 ай бұрын
  • Wonderful graphics and narration. Please continue making videos! You will get the recognition you deserve soon.

    @noahj.1232@noahj.12322 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • great graphics, and well told 😊

    @lievenmoelants@lievenmoelants Жыл бұрын
  • Amazing video, always so interesting to see the Ugly Sisters in action.

    @FiveSkitsAtFreddys@FiveSkitsAtFreddys11 ай бұрын
  • Great Video, best one I’ve seen on the channel dash

    @matthewbatchelor5084@matthewbatchelor50842 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • wow this is some high-quality stuff!

    @Barwasser@Barwasser2 жыл бұрын
  • Bro this channel is so underrated 8.5k views only? It should be more.

    @Sunsdeath@Sunsdeath2 жыл бұрын
  • Wow this channel deserves atleast 100k subs with content like this

    @Memeo.@Memeo.2 жыл бұрын
    • Wow, thanks!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • Also check this out:- Das Reich Division vs French Resistance ww2 - kzhead.info/sun/qNWOhpFxsaKwhp8/bejne.html Sinking of the Shinano by the USS Archerfish Submarine 1944 Animated - kzhead.info/sun/jMiPma2ImZaYd6s/bejne.html The Sinking of Blucher - kzhead.info/sun/m9B7m92lln2vaX0/bejne.html Sinking of Yamato Battleship - kzhead.info/sun/h5aGYtKnhappgoE/bejne.html The Saint Nazaire Raid - kzhead.info/sun/l92jlbaPjpSLoas/bejne.html The Wake Island 1941 - kzhead.info/sun/i82yYJaNZ6ydY6M/bejne.html

    @TheWarline@TheWarline Жыл бұрын
  • Very well animated

    @hjones3056@hjones30562 жыл бұрын
  • Poor Prinz Eugen... Survived the entire war only to die to a nuclear blast

    @thomasthurman7840@thomasthurman7840 Жыл бұрын
  • Historiograph brought me here. Excellent channel, you're looking at some serious growth in the near future. High quality video.

    @Tomtiedom12@Tomtiedom122 жыл бұрын
    • Wow, thank you!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome vid looking forward to the next one

    @deejj9766@deejj97662 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • Great production!

    @49metal@49metal Жыл бұрын
  • Very good video loved the detail and style

    @STRAYGAMING@STRAYGAMING2 жыл бұрын
    • Thanks so much!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • Really excellent presentation.

    @chel3SEY@chel3SEY Жыл бұрын
  • Great details!! Kudos!

    @moiyamoyam5761@moiyamoyam5761 Жыл бұрын
  • What an interesting channel! Thanks for your efforts :)

    @johnnymartinjohansen@johnnymartinjohansen Жыл бұрын
    • The British Channel, you mean ?

      @kulturfreund6631@kulturfreund66315 ай бұрын
  • This is fantastic!

    @AllthingsWW2@AllthingsWW2 Жыл бұрын
  • Historigragh sent me. Excellent work

    @AndrewBuell@AndrewBuell2 жыл бұрын
  • Now this is great content

    @lostdrathen4254@lostdrathen42542 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent, detailed exposition with good, simple and clear graphics. Information is mainly accurate as well. My only criticism is that some of the translations are a little too direct and need to be corrected into English idiom. Good to hear a non-transAtlantic accent and a clear voice. I look forward to the next one.

    @mikepowell2776@mikepowell2776 Жыл бұрын
    • Info should not be mainly accurate. Either it is or not. In second case one should not spread it having a YT channel.

      @Ansset0@Ansset0 Жыл бұрын
  • Awesome animation and subscribed.

    @fitt4393@fitt439310 ай бұрын
    • Thanks for the sub!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline10 ай бұрын
  • Great video! I have no doubt this channel will take off like a rocket quickly!👍🙏😎

    @robbabcock_@robbabcock_ Жыл бұрын
  • Can’t wait for part 2!

    @springerk2007@springerk2007 Жыл бұрын
  • This video reminds me almost to mutch about the operation room video about the dash through the channel

    @casperborumandersen1458@casperborumandersen14586 ай бұрын
  • Quality work 👍 👏

    @change_your_oil_regularly4287@change_your_oil_regularly42872 жыл бұрын
    • Thank you so much

      @TheWarline@TheWarline2 жыл бұрын
  • The account is good, but does not mention that Bletchley Park had decrypted the co-ordinates of the swept channel past Terschelling, which enabled the RAF to drop mines into the swept channel and thus damage both battlecruisers. Scharnhorst took months to repair and my recollection is that Gneisenau was bombed while on a floating dock at Kiel so that she was never used again in anger. I defer to better information.

    @peterjarvis9367@peterjarvis9367 Жыл бұрын
  • Keep 'em comin!

    @rocha7686@rocha76862 жыл бұрын
  • Heinz Knoke in his book, I flew for the Führer, described the operation from his position flying cover for part of the dash. The Germans were able to.maintain silence until swordfish appeared, them the typical Luftwaffe radio chaos ensued with everybody talking all over each other. He seemed to feel German pilots were a bit excitable when in combat.

    @michaelreifenstein2114@michaelreifenstein21142 жыл бұрын
  • “Both of these were battlecruisers” Oh boy you just caused a firestorm

    @looinrims@looinrims2 жыл бұрын
    • I rather call them Undergunned Battleships, but Also agree with the term Battlectuiser

      @Cobra-King3@Cobra-King32 жыл бұрын
    • Nah, they are battlecruisers in role and usage.

      @alphamaccao5224@alphamaccao5224 Жыл бұрын
    • @@alphamaccao5224 Not at all. The intend was to counter the Dunkerque class. That makes them Battleships.

      @hannesromhild8532@hannesromhild8532 Жыл бұрын
  • Excellent.

    @johngordonmeade361@johngordonmeade361 Жыл бұрын
  • Scharnhorst and her sister had battleship armor. Even thicker than the French dunkerque class. (Which were proclaimed battleships.) But their guns were vastly inferior to battleships by WWII. Some would say this makes them a propriety class. Others say that since they were meant to murder cruisers and run from battleships. This makes their roll that of battlecruisers. And therefore battlecrusiers they are..... In Truth, At the end of the day you can call them whenever you want.

    @spencerderosier6649@spencerderosier66492 жыл бұрын
    • Germany just called them Battleships because germany never run the name battlecruiser. In Germany a battlecruiser like ship is named a Großkreuzer (Big Cruiser). It was planned to make a retrofit on the Scharnhorst class with 3×2 380mm guns. Never happend because the war started to early and not as planned 1949.

      @michaeld.uchiha9084@michaeld.uchiha90842 жыл бұрын
    • They were fast battleships, just with relatively small guns.

      @tomriley5790@tomriley57902 жыл бұрын
    • @@michaeld.uchiha9084 Germany had loads of battlecruisers, up until Jutland anyway...

      @tomriley5790@tomriley57902 жыл бұрын
    • @@tomriley5790 Well, they werent officially called Battlecruisers. For fiscal reasons. They were Big Cruisers (Große Kreuzer), just like the Armored Cruisers before. On the same note, officially Germany didnt have Battleships (Schlachtschiffe) until, well, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau came around. All before were Ships of the Line (Linienschiffe, Pre-Dread) or Big Ships of the Line (Großlinienschiffe, Dreadnoughts, so Nassau to Bayern) Inoffically the crew etc still called them Battleships /-cruisers, cause thats what they were.

      @535phobos@535phobos2 жыл бұрын
    • Even thicker then the Dunkerque does not mean much. The Twins had a really strong Beltarmour with a decent Turtleback as backup. The Gund are also not too bad. They really performed quite well for the caliber. Penetration and range clearly make them capital ship guns. The mission profile for the Twins also was not cruiser killing but to oppose the Dunkerques. That makes them Battleships and they are classified as such.

      @hannesromhild8532@hannesromhild8532 Жыл бұрын
  • Well told...

    @tejupagi5663@tejupagi566310 ай бұрын
  • Best video I ever seen.

    @ondrejdobrota7344@ondrejdobrota73442 жыл бұрын
  • Great detail

    @johnwalsh7256@johnwalsh7256 Жыл бұрын
    • Thanks!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline Жыл бұрын
  • Also came in by a recommendation. Maybe you'll get a lot of new subscribers now :)

    2 жыл бұрын
  • ah dats why Prinz Eugene called the Lucky Ship through-out the end of war.

    @JavaIsAwesome@JavaIsAwesome10 ай бұрын
  • Great cideo! Subbed!

    @albertoroma2244@albertoroma22442 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for this, like others I had read a fair bit about it BUT your maps etc put the words in a better perspective - for example, I hadn't taken on board just how far along they were when first found nor how much luck played a part (HMS Sealion/recon Spits etc).

    @PaulP999@PaulP9996 ай бұрын
    • Glad you enjoyed it!

      @TheWarline@TheWarline6 ай бұрын
    • @@TheWarlineI always wondered why the St Margarets Bay 14" guns didn't seem to play a part, at least one was in place by end of 1940 and the other somewhere around the Dash itself..?

      @PaulP999@PaulP9996 ай бұрын
    • In 1940 two 14-inch cross-channel guns were installed near St. Margaret's at Cliffe. These guns were named 'Winnie' and 'Pooh'. The four shown in the video is an mistake.

      @TheWarline@TheWarline6 ай бұрын
    • @@TheWarline You may not be mistaken, I have strong recollections 9.2" guns were on the coast, ex-navy ones which had no ship to go on (though I think Drac mentioned plans for a "super cruiser" with 9.2" guns..). I wouldn't bet proper money on it however (the 9.2" coastal guns, not the super cruiser). My favoured author said Pooh was installed in Feb '41 so could have been around for the Dash but later on two 15" were also mounted. They and the 14" guns had duels with German heavy coast guns it is claimed, along with some railway guns of similar calibre. Anyway, today I have enjoyed two of your videos and expect I will enjoy some others no doubt.

      @PaulP999@PaulP9996 ай бұрын
  • I read someplace that, after the Gneiseau was badly damaged by bombing in Kiel in early 1942, it was planned to not only replace her bow but lengthen it. Would this have allowed her to carry eight 15 inch guns? I assume that she could not do so in her original design.

    @johnthompson4067@johnthompson40677 ай бұрын
    • No. Her nine eleven inch in three turrets were to have been replaced by six fifteen inch in three twin turrets.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70336 ай бұрын
  • " Mom I want The Operations Room!" "We have The Operations Room at home" *THE OPERATIONS ROOM AT HOME :*

    @finnanutyo1153@finnanutyo11532 жыл бұрын
    • I was gonna say BazBattles but that's fair too

      @xsh4dowfallx@xsh4dowfallx2 жыл бұрын
  • Could have sworn some fella named Galland played an active role in the dash.

    @jamesmuller3807@jamesmuller3807 Жыл бұрын
  • Nicely done Warline! Altough to be frank your map about the Dutch coastline is not just "more recent" as somebody has already pointed out but also incorrect regardless of the time it is set. Because the dijk which separates the Ijjselmeer from the North see was already built by the beginning of the war but the Markerwaarddijk which separates the Ijjselmeer and the Markermeer was not. But the point is the Markermeer is shown as a body of water on your map but the Ijjselmeer is not. This is a clear mistake whatever time the map is based on. I know it sounds harsh but to be honest I really loved your work and your video. It is great that you have put this together. I just wanted to help you with you later contents. Keep up the good work!

    @bencebenyo6788@bencebenyo6788 Жыл бұрын
    • Hi, thank you for your feedback.

      @TheWarline@TheWarline Жыл бұрын
    • The coastline look level of details of all the countries were the same. The maps were adequate to show ship movements imo.

      @TermiteUSA@TermiteUSA Жыл бұрын
    • @@TermiteUSA Nobody said it wasnt decent enough for its purpose. But still a map is a map and it should be correct otherwise people get confused and with mistakes like this its harder to locate the exact location of the story.

      @bencebenyo6788@bencebenyo6788 Жыл бұрын
  • There was also some electronic / radio deception conducted just prior to the dash.

    @NYCamper62@NYCamper62 Жыл бұрын
  • Why is the closed captioning text so wildly different from the spoken audio? In some parts, it's literally describing details never covered by the narrator.

    @dreadgod81@dreadgod81 Жыл бұрын
  • Ok so a minor correction: Victorious renown and repulse didnt battle bismarck. That was suffolk, norfolk, rodney and i think sheffield or dorsetshire, along with king george V.l

    @GearGuardianGaming@GearGuardianGaming Жыл бұрын
    • Victorious, or, at least, her aircraft, did. Repulse was with King George V (not VI) initially, but withdrew due to lack of fuel Renown stayed with Ark Royal, as the whereabouts of Prinz Eugen were unknown.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
  • Listening to the operation being narrated got me anxious.

    @randied603@randied603 Жыл бұрын
  • Great content dude I landed here due too historiograph.

    @yashkalkar223@yashkalkar2232 жыл бұрын
  • Came from historigraph, great content indeed !

    @williaml.@williaml.2 жыл бұрын
  • Radio silence. Had the fighters been able to call back position, the Germans might possible have been stopped at the choke point. Well done Britain

    @qzwxecrv0192837465@qzwxecrv0192837465 Жыл бұрын
  • 6-5-24. 12.47.p.m. 22' Saludos internautas, uno mas que se suma a las fila.lei sobre la operacion cerbero, en los 70, en una obra de coleccion. " ASI FUE LA 2DA GM" y lo percibi con emocion y romantisismo, ahora que he visto este video, comprendo lo que la narracion describia, ((( si pudieras describir, las batallas y contrabatallas de rhize, diciembre, 41 a octubre, 42, graficarlo, ahhhh, tambien lo de las colinas de mamayek, ((( stalingrado: setiembre: 42, gracias.....saludos internautas, ...firmes y erguidos.

    @javieralarcon1485@javieralarcon148512 күн бұрын
  • Nice

    @taikosultanz6243@taikosultanz62432 жыл бұрын
  • Brilliant except for one very important qualifier - by this time the British had cracked almost all the German enciphered combat coms. Although still deliberately withheld it is almost certain the British knew every aspect of the German Navy directions to their ship commanders as well as essential navigational parameters that allowed them to close in as they did. There are some references out there that provide some limited descriptions of what Benchley Park had already done, the impact on specific seemingly amazingly successful operations (to include Kursk) remains highly classified or obfuscated. Admittedly however egalitarianism is a potentially lethal strategy in warfare, being oblivious and remaining so to systematic security breaches or technology compromises are extremely serious issues that must be prevented with utmost attention to potential indicators and ruthless prompt energy to immediately and verifiably correct such issues.

    @rogerwilcoshirley2270@rogerwilcoshirley227010 ай бұрын
  • Great. Mostly unknown stuff ,even in Germany

    @canerguener8664@canerguener86649 ай бұрын
  • Operation Cerberus was just about the only time in the entire war that German ships proceeded at sea with proper air cover. Perhaps their freinds in japan talked some sense into them.

    @studentjohn35@studentjohn35 Жыл бұрын
  • To not include Rodney in the graphic regarding sinking Bismarck is criminal.

    @jamesoliver6625@jamesoliver6625 Жыл бұрын
  • Much as people like to talk about "blah blah, German strategic defeat" , "blah blah running away / retreating", while extolling the heroism of the British units which were sent piecemeal as part of the 'plans' for Fuller, I simply cannot fault the German operations in either planning or execution. 'Cerberus' is rightly viewed as a brilliant operation by the Germans.

    @AndrewGivens@AndrewGivens Жыл бұрын
    • Do you know who firdst called the Channel Dash a German Strategic Defeat? Some chap called Erich Raeder. I suggest that he was in a position to know.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
  • which island is being illustrated when you claim that Tirpiz was in the Baltic Sea at 4:40?

    @pbssandman9985@pbssandman9985 Жыл бұрын
  • That German task force cruised the English Channel taunting the Brits to do something about it…

    @anthonyiocca5683@anthonyiocca5683 Жыл бұрын
    • By which I assume you mean that the three German heavy ships fled back to Germany under a massive air umbrella, abandoned any future possibility of operating in the Atlantic, and thus played almost no part in the rest of the war, Admiral Raeder declared the Dash a major strategic reversal. He was correct.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
    • @@dovetonsturdee7033 A risky dash, torpedos and mines made it to risky…

      @anthonyiocca5683@anthonyiocca5683 Жыл бұрын
  • I’ve always heard the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau referred to as “Pocket Battleships,” not as “battlecruisers.” In fact, when HMS Glorious was sunk by the Gneisenau and Scharnhorst, the message it sent out specifically identified the two capital ships attacking it as “PBs,” which was the abbreviation the Royal Navy used for German pocket battleships. I had always understood that, though lighter than a regular battleship, the pocket battleship still had more armour than the typical fast battlecruiser (such as the HMS Hood). Could you please clarify this terminological confusion? Doesn’t a pocket battleship also have a bit more firepower than a typical battlecruiser, which sacrifices armour and a few guns in the secondary battery usually in return for markedly increased speed? I guess I’m simply wondering *how* the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau survived *so* much battle damage from torpedoes, naval guns, aircraft bombs, and mines without sinking, whereas the most celebrated battlecruiser in the world, the HMS Hood, was sunk quickly by **ONE* direct hit from one of Bismarck’s naval guns…to be followed in short order to the bottom of the sea by the battlecruiser HMS Repulse, part of the foolishly small Force Z sent with nearly no air cover to “intimidate the Japanese” and defend Singapore. Instead, the kido butai had little difficulty locating the battleship HMS Prince of Wales and the Repulse; launched their torpedo and dive bombers; and easily sunk both warships. This is my point: a pocket battleship *does* sacrifice *some* armour to *seem* to comply with the Washington Naval Treaty, but in fact these warships were still perfectly well defended enough to operate in formations with slower ships in relative safety, and, more importantly, to form part of a naval battle line, and be able to depend on its armour to offer it a good deal of protection as it exchanged shots with enemy warships. The same cannot be said of the standard battlecruiser, whose greatest assets were its speed and maneuverability.

    @MrMalvolio29@MrMalvolio2911 ай бұрын
    • "pocket battleship" referred to the much smaller KMS Deutschland and KMS Graf Spee, equipped with smaller guns (only 6, 11 inch guns) and lighter armor, as well as being much smaller to the Scharnhorst and Gneisenau, which were very much comparable to the HMS Hood in size. Pocket Battleships have far less firepower and armor than battlecruisers, and were only employed by the Germans during the interwar period to skirt treaty limitations on their ships. Think of battlecruisers as battleships with less armor and higher speeds. Pocket Battleships are smaller and weaker in every way--their like bite-sized candy.

      @fightingdreamer123@fightingdreamer12310 ай бұрын
    • @@fightingdreamer123 , this was not how the Royal Navy categorized the Scharnhorst or Gneisenau. When those ships were spotted, HMS Glorious Used the abbreviations P/Bs, in the message sent to the Admiralty. I appreciate your response, though. Thank you.

      @MrMalvolio29@MrMalvolio2910 ай бұрын
    • @@MrMalvolio29 Glorious had more pressing matters concerning her than whether she was being attacked by Deutschlands or Scharnhorsts. The Scharnhorsts were definitely called battleships by the German navy.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70339 ай бұрын
    • @@fightingdreamer123The Germans never used the term Pocket Battleship. They used Panzerschiffe which means armored ship. In terms of concept the Panzerschiffe were closer to the armoured cruisers of the pre-dreadnought era

      @RocketHarry865@RocketHarry8656 ай бұрын
    • Deutschland was renamed Lutzow - before the Norwegian campaign. Renamed by Hitler as he did not want a warship called Deutschland to be sunk. In the German Navy, Deutschland / later Lutzow was classified as panzerschiff / armoured ship , this could be translated as armoured cruiser. Some newspapers of the time called the Deutschland a pocket battleship.

      @dalek3086@dalek30866 ай бұрын
  • Such a dash that made the British look very incompetent. "Fotune favors the bold". It certainly did so her

    @crisespinoza1979@crisespinoza1979 Жыл бұрын
    • No. It made the Royal Air Force look incompetent.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee7033 Жыл бұрын
  • I would not want to have to stand in front Churchill and tell the bad news. Nor would I want to be any of the major figures in this.

    @donaldboyer8182@donaldboyer81824 ай бұрын
  • Amazing how determined the British were to totally annihilate the Kriegsmariner

    @fastair8546@fastair85468 ай бұрын
  • Well conducted operation by the Germans and to be frank incompetence by the RAF and RN, most of the MTBs had petrol engines by the way and were prone to catching fire and exploding catstrophically. Even so it strategically to my mind feels like a failure - "We have well strategically positioned warships - I know genius idea we'll move them to somewhere where they're less of a threat! Victory!" That said Scharnhorst and Gneisenau don't seem to ever have managed to go to sea without breaking or flooding something. Incidentally Ark Royal is spelt Ark (not Arc)

    @tomriley5790@tomriley57902 жыл бұрын
  • I betcha Otto never misses an opportunity to tell people he is a celiac.

    @RoboticDragon@RoboticDragon10 ай бұрын
  • 14.35 The swordfish aircraft were massacred a German fighter pilot who took part could not understand why such aircraft were sent unsupported against the defensive screen. I read very recently that Admiral Ramsey considered the attack pointless and suicidal and said so but the orders from the Admiralty were simply the Navy will do its duty. When it comes down to it the Admiralty knew the proverbial was going to hit the fan and the best way to divert it was a heroic sacrifice and the swordfish attack filled the bill. someone else said the channel in North Sea is shallow and it's known that ships have to stay in particular channels at various states of the tide . If they had dropped mines like the one that damaged Scharnhorst in the channels hours beforehand it would have been far more effective,

    @freebeerfordworkers@freebeerfordworkers10 ай бұрын
    • I read a comment somewhere from the son of somebody lost in that Swordfish attack, he was quite scathing, especially about them taking all the navigators who were not needed for an attack in sight of the coast and were valuable trained men Britain could ill afford to lose.

      @sean_d@sean_d5 ай бұрын
  • Even if they despised the Nazis, the British had to at least appreciate the Nelson-like boldness associated with the Channel Run.

    @princessofthecape2078@princessofthecape207811 ай бұрын
    • Except Nelson never fled.

      @dovetonsturdee7033@dovetonsturdee70339 ай бұрын
  • Scharnhorst was sunk over a year later at North Cape, Prinz Eugen survived the war, was surrendered to the US who then sunk her at Bikini Atoll and Gniesenau was used as a block and sunk intentionally at the end of the war and was scrapped after Germany surrendered

    @AirwolfGames@AirwolfGames Жыл бұрын
    • Prinz Eugen was not sunk at Bikini Atoll, she survived able and baker, due to a bilge pump failure she rolled over at Kwajalein Atoll where she rests with her rudder, port shaft and center screw visible.

      @powderb2009@powderb200911 ай бұрын
    • @@powderb2009 thank you for clear that out, Prinz Eugen would have survived if there were no radiation after the nuclear explosion. RIP Prinz Eugen 🕊

      @Rockstarmodz32@Rockstarmodz328 ай бұрын
  • 130 bombers couldn't hit these two ships in their dock. They needed dive bombers. What about having a sub sitting outside of Brest? Looks like the British needed better search patterns.

    @ppumpkin3282@ppumpkin32828 ай бұрын
  • Rest in Peace: *Kenneth Campbell, VC* and his three crew mates, *Sergeants J. P. Scott DFM RCAF (navigator), R. W. Hillman (wireless operator)* and *W. C. Mulliss (air gunner)* that died alongside Sir Campbell after their Beaufort was bought down by anti-air after their daring torpedo run. According to Wiki. The Germans buried Sir Campbell and his three crew members with full military honours. Sadly, while their heroic sacrifice didnt sink the Gneisenau, They still did enough damage to push her back to port

    @Rose.Of.Hizaki@Rose.Of.Hizaki6 ай бұрын
  • It seems there is some debate over whether you pronounce the 'G' in Gneisenau. I have always been taught it was a silent G by professors I learned under for Modern History, but some channels on YT seem to believe you do say the G making it an awkward word to speak.

    @ukmediawarrior@ukmediawarrior8 ай бұрын
KZhead