KZhead
Ойын-сауық

Largest & Biggest Strategic Bombers in the World (2020) | Active Bombers Size Comparison

The Buzz
2020 ж. 2 Нау.
228 639 Рет қаралды
Жүктеу

**Largest & Biggest Strategic Bombers in the World (2020) | Active Bombers Size Comparison **
► More Military videos on ‘THE BUZZ’: • 10 Most Powerful Howit...
🏆 Video Information:
 A bomber is a combat aircraft designed to attack ground and naval targets by dropping air-to-ground weaponry (such as bombs), launching torpedoes, or deploying air-launched cruise missiles. .
 There are two major classifications of bomber, strategic, and tactical. Strategic bombing is done by heavy bombers primarily designed for long-range bombing missions against strategic targets to diminish the enemy's ability to wage war by limiting access to resources through crippling infrastructure or reducing industrial output. Whilst tactical bombing is aimed at countering enemy military activity and in supporting offensive operations, and is typically assigned to smaller aircraft operating at shorter ranges, typically near the troops on the ground or against enemy shipping.
 In this video, we present you the list the size comparison of active strategic bombers in the world today.
Enjoy watching. Cheers!
🔝 Sources & Credits:-
military.wikia.org/wiki/
www.militaryfactory.com/
www.army-technology.com/weapons/
www.military-today.com/
machinesforwar.blogspot.com/20...
basilzolotov.com/side-views/tu...
basilzolotov.com/side-views/tu...
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
* Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
The Buzz does not own the rights to these pictures. They have, in accordance with fair use, been repurposed with the intent of educating and inspiring others. However, if any content owners would like their images removed, please contact us by email at-thebuzz938@gmail.com

Пікірлер

  • It's called White swan by the Russian Airforce. NATO designation is Black jack.

    @dataman6744@dataman67444 жыл бұрын

    • The US takes pride in being colorblind. They even voted a Kenyan into presidency.

      @nickkorkodylas5005@nickkorkodylas50053 жыл бұрын

    • @@nickkorkodylas5005 Nice racism bruh

      @kptlt.phillipthomsen5973@kptlt.phillipthomsen59733 жыл бұрын

    • @@nickkorkodylas5005 it’s actually because NATO has a certain way of naming things, for bombers it always starts with a B like the bear or in this case the blackjack, fighters start with a f, like the flanker and fulcrum. This is to keep things consistent so even if you don’t know the name if someone says bear you know it’s a bomber and if someone says flanker you know it’s a fighter.

      @Koyomix86@Koyomix863 жыл бұрын

    • @@Koyomix86 Guess it explains why *B* arrack was so hellbent to bombing people.

      @nickkorkodylas5005@nickkorkodylas50053 жыл бұрын

    • @@nickkorkodylas5005 Stop crying man!

      @mitahenare8901@mitahenare89012 жыл бұрын

  • Tu 160 the beautiful bird the LETHAL bird.

    @manishbhat2466@manishbhat24664 жыл бұрын

    • My favorite combat plane

      @soenarsesastrokarijo3@soenarsesastrokarijo33 жыл бұрын

    • Well so is the B2 spirit

      @peterharrop179@peterharrop1793 жыл бұрын

    • @@peterharrop179 B2 looks like bat

      @TheDazzler420@TheDazzler4203 жыл бұрын

    • TheDazzler420 true

      @constantinocampero6722@constantinocampero67223 жыл бұрын

    • The B-1B carries more and flies lower.

      @gazof-the-north5708@gazof-the-north57083 жыл бұрын

  • Totally different bombers. In Russia, the real heavy bomber still is the Tu-22M3 Backfire, today Tu-22M3M. The Tu-95MS and MSM are cruise missile carriers (actually a Tu142MK modified for long range aviation). The Tu160 is a mach2 strategic nuclear bomber (today probably with conventional capability too).

    @riccardosmirnov5063@riccardosmirnov50633 жыл бұрын

  • Muy ilustrativos, claros, precisos tus videos muy agradecido contigo y tus colaboradores, tremendo equipo,. Excelete

    @ramirosuarez2321@ramirosuarez23214 жыл бұрын

  • I find it odd how seen alone in the air the Bear looks enormous while the Lancer looks like the size of a fighter jet but in reality they are both about the same size.

    @listerdave1240@listerdave12403 жыл бұрын

  • Imagine identifying a fleet of Tu-160s flying overhead. Who would you even call?

    @George.Coleman@George.Coleman Жыл бұрын

    • Ghost Busters!

      @mikaelbiilmann6826@mikaelbiilmann6826 Жыл бұрын

  • Tupulev 160...i like

    @subhrohasdakshuvro481@subhrohasdakshuvro4813 жыл бұрын

  • Good video from 🇮🇹

    @meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo87@meand6ix9inedieinprisionpo874 жыл бұрын

  • Nice❤

    @rajmishra6221@rajmishra62214 жыл бұрын

  • Awesome

    @videomotivationymas5540@videomotivationymas55403 жыл бұрын

  • Tupolev Tu-160🥂🥂

    @SoydeCubaCompay@SoydeCubaCompay Жыл бұрын

  • Make a video on top 10 towed howitzer

    @shubhamkumar_z@shubhamkumar_z4 жыл бұрын

  • The White Swan has no equal

    @carinhall4508@carinhall45084 жыл бұрын

    • @Frank The Tank Russia has the largest active bomber aircrafts in the world

      @Electrono7036@Electrono70363 жыл бұрын

    • @ADRIEN DOUCET B1Bs will not be sent in unless air superior is achieved and the b2 is more affect then you think

      @TN_Whiskey@TN_Whiskey3 жыл бұрын

    • A b1 knockoff

      @batuhan8604@batuhan86043 жыл бұрын

    • @@batuhan8604 both have different roles, Tu 160 was built for Strategic Nuclear Deliverance while B 1b is a close range air support. If you really wanna compare it with something, then you have Tu 22 which was also built before B 1b.

      @AnIndianPatriot@AnIndianPatriot3 жыл бұрын

    • @ADRIEN DOUCET not sure how you think a stealth bomber is less effective. In order to even know these planes are over your airspace you need to see one first as the radar cross section is so small that it is drowned out by large amounts of bugs. Can it hold the most bonbs/missiles? No. By the time you know it is above you it has already dropped its payload and is moving away. Look at what the iraqis did to try and defend against them. They shot anti aircraft guns into the air at random which did them no good.

      @richwood2741@richwood27413 жыл бұрын

  • I wouldn't have never, ever guessed that the B-1 actually weighs more than a B-52...go figure.

    @jamesorsby7553@jamesorsby7553 Жыл бұрын

    • More ordnance too

      @willdenoble1898@willdenoble1898 Жыл бұрын

  • Tu 160 M2

    @adron0997@adron09972 жыл бұрын

  • Please buzz make video on top ten towed artillery

    @govindsinghrawat1338@govindsinghrawat13384 жыл бұрын

    • Meinst du von Pferden gezogen, oder mit gezogenen Rohren?

      @berndlinnecke5738@berndlinnecke57382 ай бұрын

  • Damn the B2 is heavy

    @Ksehsatoo@Ksehsatoo Жыл бұрын

  • Правильнее наверное указывать не вес пустого самолёта а вес нормальной или максимальной взлетной массы. Там у многих он в два три раза больше веса пустого

    @user-sg9fj2ld4k@user-sg9fj2ld4k3 жыл бұрын

  • Kinda wild that the B2 is the smallest but it's still #3 in wingspan Such a wild ass plane

    @Troggie42@Troggie423 жыл бұрын

    • Weird how this channel thinks the word biggest means longest.... length x width x height

      @nyag1337@nyag13372 жыл бұрын

    • Dude its litteraly called a flying wing

      @timothyimmanuel570@timothyimmanuel5702 жыл бұрын

    • Probably why it's called the flying wing. lol.

      @dewboy910@dewboy9102 жыл бұрын

    • It's also pretty stupid operatively. It costs 2 billion dollars each, with which China and Russia build a dozen or more of their strategic bombers, and needs over 60 ground personnel to operate and maintain each one. It's a fancy ass thing that makes no sense anymore after the strong developments of 8K optometric array detection systems which make old "stealth" technology completely useless. In terms of performance it's equivalent to the TU-95 "Bear" but consumes 3 times as much fuel and needs 4 times more personnel to run it.

      @ClaudeMagicbox@ClaudeMagicbox2 жыл бұрын

    • @@ClaudeMagicbox Let's be honest, all of the bombers on this list, aside from *maybe* the B-1 and B-2, would be shot down instantly if they tried to attack a powerful nation. The US wanted to develop a bomber that could fly into Eastern Europe and survive.

      @Jake-rs9nq@Jake-rs9nq2 жыл бұрын

  • B 52 should be at number ☝️!. . It's proven itself time and time again!👍

    @g1native@g1native2 жыл бұрын

    • Yeah against the people who can't fight. 🤣

      @razercortex9292@razercortex9292 Жыл бұрын

    • againts cave man

      @Brian-qj4kk@Brian-qj4kk Жыл бұрын

  • Something about B2 . look is just everything

    @njnikusha@njnikusha2 жыл бұрын

  • TU 160 White Swan

    @lac9586@lac95862 жыл бұрын

  • Load capacity would help

    @chonomercy@chonomercy3 жыл бұрын

  • Mirrored swan)

    @HakujinTrue@HakujinTrue3 жыл бұрын

  • You did not mention their playload capacity. How to compare??

    @StayHealthy363@StayHealthy3632 жыл бұрын

  • Do retired bombers comparison

    @patrickorjaliza9174@patrickorjaliza91742 жыл бұрын

  • Even though it's not in service , the B-36 was the largest ever. Makes these planes look mid-sized.

    @ronaldcharan2705@ronaldcharan27053 жыл бұрын

    • Nah 🖕🏻🤣🖕🏻

      @tomaspolizzi3321@tomaspolizzi33213 жыл бұрын

    • Nope, Tu-160 is. Holds the world record for it.

      @jimallen9859@jimallen98592 жыл бұрын

    • @@jimallen9859 B52 Wing span is 185 FT B36 Wingspan is 230 FT the TU-160 is 183 FT

      @Nick-jl2yp@Nick-jl2yp2 жыл бұрын

  • Is that empty weight or max take-off weight?

    @mikaelbiilmann6826@mikaelbiilmann6826 Жыл бұрын

  • looking at a b2 bomber sideways look wierd

    @sebastiansethd.lastimosa6610@sebastiansethd.lastimosa66103 жыл бұрын

  • Tu95 is the most beautiful aircraft in my opinion. As far as bombers are concerned at least, f14 is the best looking fighter jet

    @SyntaxError-nz4kg@SyntaxError-nz4kg2 жыл бұрын

  • That weight is including the amunition load?

    @sihebat1@sihebat14 жыл бұрын

    • no. just empty weight

      @thebuzz4108@thebuzz41084 жыл бұрын

  • India also have tu 142 bomber 😊😊

    @Lexcru24@Lexcru243 жыл бұрын

  • Compare their range

    @buttert5091@buttert50913 жыл бұрын

  • 3:13 The NATO designation is Blackjack not White Swan

    @user-ii2jo4nh4j@user-ii2jo4nh4j3 жыл бұрын

  • Bomb load is an important figure that was left out.

    @kevinferrin5695@kevinferrin56952 жыл бұрын

  • What did you mean? The longest, the heaviest, the widest wingspan, or what. This makes your ranking very different.

    @HeinrichGermany1@HeinrichGermany12 ай бұрын

  • The video should be "longest bombers". The B2 is larger by weight than 5 and 6.

    @wisenber@wisenber2 жыл бұрын

  • The list India will come as soon 💪

    @dubaitamilwaalapranksfunny9713@dubaitamilwaalapranksfunny9713 Жыл бұрын

  • All of them are dinosaurs except for the B2.

    @WeSRT4@WeSRT4 Жыл бұрын

  • 1

    @user-yz7bf4jo4b@user-yz7bf4jo4b4 жыл бұрын

    • 2

      @georgeantabi6025@georgeantabi60253 жыл бұрын

  • B-52 was never called Stratofortress, it's was B-25.

    @gradientascent4218@gradientascent42183 ай бұрын

  • The biggest bomber in history is the b36 peace maker which makes the b52 looks small

    @coolsquad7428@coolsquad74282 жыл бұрын

    • No doubt but it’s not operational, these still are

      @tupolev.designs@tupolev.designs Жыл бұрын

    • Он не был стратегическим

      @doorkapatrool536@doorkapatrool5366 ай бұрын

  • Tokyo C7 Flying Saucer with Plasma Sun Gun 8 of Them, Speed of 7000 Time Speed of Light ,300 Crew Members

    @kimkotanaku7490@kimkotanaku7490 Жыл бұрын

  • we do the most minimal amount of trolling

    @sniper7303@sniper7303 Жыл бұрын

  • Russia is weapons capital in europe 🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳❤️🇷🇺❤️🇮🇳

    @ananya-rb1un@ananya-rb1un4 жыл бұрын

    • WTH is this comment?! LoL why the Indian flag

      @sir.justain4403@sir.justain44034 жыл бұрын

    • @@sir.justain4403 india russia are friends of all time 🇮🇳💖🇷🇺

      @ananya-rb1un@ananya-rb1un4 жыл бұрын

    • @@sir.justain4403 can we friend

      @jitu5923@jitu59233 жыл бұрын

    • Lol but america is no.1 powerful country

      @basedguy___@basedguy___3 жыл бұрын

    • @@basedguy___ Yes. We are friends 🚩💅🕉️🇮🇳👩💖🧔🇺🇲💪🚩

      @ananya-rb1un@ananya-rb1un3 жыл бұрын

  • Putting the B-2 behind the H-6 seems silly considering the B-2 is almost twice as heavy and way wider. Not to mention it can carry better weapons farther, faster, and can lift over twice as much weight then that Chinese copy of an old Soviet bomber.

    @lemmingsfly@lemmingsfly8 ай бұрын

    • Это сравнение длинны

      @doorkapatrool536@doorkapatrool5366 ай бұрын

  • This girl mirrored the images!!! YAY!!!

    @runtime1976@runtime19762 жыл бұрын

  • Строго говоря: Ту-95 и Ту-160 - ракетоносцы. Бомбить их учили значительно позже и в качестве расширения номенклатуры применяемого вооружения, которая не является главной целью их применения. А Ту - 22 не был стратегическим. Это ракетоносец оперативно-тактического назначения. Так что из представителей советской школы бомбардировщиком можно назвать разве что H-6, который является развитием Ту-16.

    @paulzero25@paulzero253 жыл бұрын

    • Не развитие, а лицензионная сборка с последующей модернизацией по части электронной начинки.

      @harkko5683@harkko56832 жыл бұрын

    • Ту-22 изначально был стратегическим, но лишился функции дощаправки в воздухе согласно договору о сокращении наступательного вооружения и перестал им быть

      @doorkapatrool536@doorkapatrool5366 ай бұрын

    • @@doorkapatrool536 от того, что у комплекса есть или нет штанги, или дальность действия не определяет назначения. Стратегические бомбардировщики решаю стратегические задачи, так же как и номенклатура вооружения, прикрученная к нему. Но, если в 160 загрузить в бомбоотсеки по завязку и отправить бомбить передовую, он будет решать тактическую задачу, при этом не перестанет быть стратегическим ракетоносцем. Не путайте теплое с мягким. Главная задача 22 - уничтожение АУГ, а это оперативно-тактическая задача.

      @paulzero25@paulzero256 ай бұрын

  • Tupolev tu 160 .

    @ivansouza646@ivansouza6462 ай бұрын

  • The TU series is like move the fuck over

    @jetstreamchad4712@jetstreamchad47123 жыл бұрын

  • Hmmm.... is this right? A B52 is empty 83.250 kg. But starting weight is 120.000 kg. Maximum weight is 220.000 kg. It would be nice to get the complete information from Wikipedia.

    @ronalmere@ronalmere4 жыл бұрын

    • I gave the empty weight of that aircraft. I didn't mention about maximum take off weight and loaded weight.

      @thebuzz4108@thebuzz41084 жыл бұрын

    • @@thebuzz4108 It is just a very interesting comparison. I checked several bombers. Big differences in price and payload. Thanks for sharing.

      @ronalmere@ronalmere4 жыл бұрын

  • B-1 Lancer 👍

    @PpAirO5@PpAirO52 жыл бұрын

  • B52 is old but still kickin.

    @juicylemons6843@juicylemons68434 жыл бұрын

  • Where is the best and bigest and fastest TU 160m ?

    @natasaradenkov2352@natasaradenkov23522 жыл бұрын

  • Is this an American channel why are metric units listed first?

    @kilobyte8321@kilobyte83212 жыл бұрын

  • please,I wanna ♥

    @secretsaturday2089@secretsaturday20894 жыл бұрын

  • 爆撃機の全長比べて何の意味があるんだ？重要なのは積載量と航続距離だろ

    @punjin3702@punjin37024 жыл бұрын

  • TUPOLEV TU-160. 😍😍😍

    @tomaspolizzi3321@tomaspolizzi33213 жыл бұрын

  • Cost BI vs TU22

    @singarajancarter1042@singarajancarter10422 жыл бұрын

  • The XB-70 is the largest bomber over all

    @whitestaralliance7190@whitestaralliance71903 жыл бұрын

    • True

      @georgeantabi6025@georgeantabi60253 жыл бұрын

    • But it never really became a bomber

      @user-ii2jo4nh4j@user-ii2jo4nh4j3 жыл бұрын

    • Lector Dogmatis Videx no but it was deigned to be a bomber

      @whitestaralliance7190@whitestaralliance71903 жыл бұрын

    • @@whitestaralliance7190 never made it though sadly

      @user-ii2jo4nh4j@user-ii2jo4nh4j3 жыл бұрын

    • Lector Dogmatis Videx no but I would still put it in

      @whitestaralliance7190@whitestaralliance71903 жыл бұрын

  • you dont even list the range and how much it can carry.. kind of the most important thing..

    @mackjsm7105@mackjsm71052 жыл бұрын

  • They should have been rated by payload.

    @josephgibbons1631@josephgibbons16312 жыл бұрын

    • In terms of payload, the Tu-160 is also in the first place

      @tonibrazo4717@tonibrazo4717 Жыл бұрын

  • TU-22M Atau TU-95

    @danihutama4113@danihutama41132 жыл бұрын

  • Make a video on indian army😘😘

    @suyashgupta9016@suyashgupta90164 жыл бұрын

  • You could've ranked these bombers by their load capacity, You chose to rank them by their length which is totally meaningless!

    @mofleh177@mofleh1773 ай бұрын

  • Largest and biggest?

    @Gostwriterindisguise@Gostwriterindisguise Жыл бұрын

  • Does Indian Air force used tu 22 m? If not, then why you put Indian air force ignisia n flag on it?

    @himangshubaruah1140@himangshubaruah11402 жыл бұрын

    • Yes, u saw that too 😂. Very strange..

      @user-FEFe@user-FEFe18 күн бұрын

  • Mother Russia 🇷🇺 👏🏼

    @elimrmartian@elimrmartian2 жыл бұрын

  • Ту-160 Миг-31 the best

    @user-gx1kh6sf8v@user-gx1kh6sf8v3 жыл бұрын

  • Tu-95😩😩😩

    @ahmsdenielp.herrera7190@ahmsdenielp.herrera71902 жыл бұрын

  • H6 is just a medium bomber

    @SPEARHEADGLOBAL@SPEARHEADGLOBAL3 жыл бұрын

  • Russia always number 1 in military weapons 🤒🤒

    @zhangbaweiba9033@zhangbaweiba90334 жыл бұрын

    • Well they did give PepsiCo a bunch of nuclear subs and aircraft carriers for a bunch of pepsi

      @DuggzValentine@DuggzValentine3 жыл бұрын

    • @@DuggzValentine that is what’s called a pro gamer move

      @user-ii2jo4nh4j@user-ii2jo4nh4j3 жыл бұрын

    • Russia isnt always the number 1 lol russia is just number 1 at biggest country in the world

      @anonymouse6129@anonymouse61293 жыл бұрын

  • « إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا »

    @ahmad000almahdi@ahmad000almahdi2 жыл бұрын

  • As Bombers go, I think the B-1 is the sexiest. Killer plane.

    @kenflagler635@kenflagler6352 жыл бұрын

  • What ? See the photo of tu 22m bomber and see it carefully on its tail , there was indian flag colour in its tail ????

    @praveenkaushik655@praveenkaushik6552 жыл бұрын

  • B2 at 7. You have got to be joking

    @Jermo7899@Jermo7899 Жыл бұрын

  • I’m no expert, but I’d say this “Buzz” logo infringes the copyright of McClatchy Newspapers’ Sacramento, Fresno and Modesto Bee newspapers and online news outlets. This ‘Bee’ drawing clearly is a copy in spirit of the real “Bee” newspaper logos, which originally were created by for McClatchy by Walt Disney. Interesting report though.

    @HDBoyWonder@HDBoyWonder2 жыл бұрын

  • 0.5 have the Romanian Flag,so,does Romania have Tu,anyhow?

    @iuliansin7657@iuliansin7657 Жыл бұрын

  • B2 is the smallest bomber ever created.... from the eyes of radar

    @Catsrule1132@Catsrule1132 Жыл бұрын

  • Tu-22 is not a strategic bomber, he is a tactician after the IRNFT agreement.

    @ilmol3829@ilmol38294 жыл бұрын

  • Its crazy B-52 is still operational & best in the world after all these decades

    @MrAnonymous3333@MrAnonymous33334 жыл бұрын

    • Ol' reliable

      @awesomefacepalm@awesomefacepalm4 жыл бұрын

    • Best in the world? Based on? not saying it's not an excellent platform, but I think 'best' would be quite an overstatement without proper backing.

      @nottoday3817@nottoday38174 жыл бұрын

    • Ho many shoot down in Vietnam ? 😅

      @GangsarDwi@GangsarDwi4 жыл бұрын

    • @@GangsarDwi 52 b52s were killed . Some of them by mig-21 fighters, some by soviet groud to air missiles s-75

      @user-gd2pb3mb6h@user-gd2pb3mb6h4 жыл бұрын

    • Together with the Tu-95/142, the B-52 is a 1950's workhorse that just never seem to actually get obsolete. Sure, they need weapons and electronic upgrades every now and then, but their basic performance (range, payload) has been proven, and not surpassed since, and they've outlived every other bomber from that era (not counting the Chinese Tu-16's, whatever they're called).

      @callespringer9718@callespringer97184 жыл бұрын

  • What the heck. I had no idea Tu-160 was that large. I thought that because it was based on B-1 that it was also similar in size.

    @MiroslavHundak@MiroslavHundak3 жыл бұрын

    • Tu-160 isn't based on B-1. It's the other way round. Tu-160 is a design from the 1950's.

      @jimallen9859@jimallen98592 жыл бұрын

    • @@jimallen9859 You're right. My bad.

      @MiroslavHundak@MiroslavHundak2 жыл бұрын

  • India usa sa b1lancer bombar karana aur rassia sa tu160 black jack bombar dil kara jai hind jai bharat banda matram

    @SonuKumar-iw5fr@SonuKumar-iw5fr Жыл бұрын

  • Just because it is the largest does not mean it carries the most ordnance. The b1 b has a larger payload than the largest bomber. The only thing that the russian bomber has that is better than the b1 b is it faster and has a slightly larger range. The russian bomber due to its empty weight has a much reduced payload capacity. Funny that people compare all the bombers and see who would win but in truth none of them would ever have reason to go head to head. Their targets are never in the air. Their missions involve dropping bombs or large missiles on targets that are at ground/sea level. Air to air combat is a no go for all of them.

    @richwood2741@richwood27413 жыл бұрын

    • This m8 is spittin' some facts here

      @georgeantabi6025@georgeantabi60253 жыл бұрын

    • And also they are from completely different countries, who designed and built them with completely different purposes in mind.

      @user-ii2jo4nh4j@user-ii2jo4nh4j3 жыл бұрын

    • b1b carries 34 tons, tu-160 45 tons bombs, use google )

      @Hollivet@Hollivet3 жыл бұрын

    • this was about the Size comparisons, not ordnances

      @bayan5694@bayan56943 жыл бұрын

  • 白天鹅yyds

    @user-db8by1ti8h@user-db8by1ti8h3 жыл бұрын

  • That b-2spirit isn't low visible, ask Serbs.

    @slavisastankovic4599@slavisastankovic45994 жыл бұрын

    • wrong plane you are thinking of the F-117A the B-2 Spirit has far better track record

      @TN_Whiskey@TN_Whiskey3 жыл бұрын

  • Number 0: USA B-36D Peacemaker

    @damiangonzalezlopez829@damiangonzalezlopez8293 жыл бұрын

    • This is actually my all time favourite bomber

      @georgeantabi6025@georgeantabi60253 жыл бұрын

  • 😂😂Russian baby bear

    @MrVanalen@MrVanalen3 жыл бұрын

  • le mirage 2000 👍🏼🇨🇵

    @mehditurki5480@mehditurki54803 жыл бұрын

  • ' look at number 06... china xian H-6 was made from ussr russia... Xian H-6 - (Conventional Bomber) Original, conventional bomber; Tupolev Tu-16 produced under license in China, first flew in 1959. A prototype conducted China's first aerial nuclear weapon test at Lop Nor on 14 May 1965... The Tupolev Tu-16 (NATO reporting name: Badger) is a twin-engined jet strategic heavy bomber used by the Soviet Union. It has been flown for almost 70 years... see that tu-16 and xian h-6 are same airplanes bombers... pooooor both countrys china=ussr russia

    @bestamerica@bestamerica10 ай бұрын

  • the way she pronounces the word 'strategic' bothers me

    @robertcetl7358@robertcetl73583 жыл бұрын

  • B-52 Bomber B-1 Bomber B-2 Bomber Are My Favorite GOD BLESS AMERICA 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

    @mitchelljohnleslie1696@mitchelljohnleslie16963 жыл бұрын

    • Авангард благословит..

      @user-oc9gs5lc3t@user-oc9gs5lc3t3 жыл бұрын

  • 3rd heart me

    @waraghud@waraghud4 жыл бұрын

  • Horrendous narration. Perfect for young children and mental cripples.

    @unfurling3129@unfurling31293 жыл бұрын

    • The narration pisses me off too lol

      @stefanw3953@stefanw39533 жыл бұрын

    • Definitely a video where a robo voice would have been a better choice for narration. A potato could have done a better job.

      @ExWEIMan@ExWEIMan3 жыл бұрын

  • Flying Saucer Vril 9 Build 1945 By Maria Orsic Could Destroy Them all In 5 Minutes by Use Her Worm Hole Machine Make them in to 0.5% Matter Vril 250 Build July 2022 by Maria Orsic On Alpha Centauri B Third Planet From the SUN

    @kimkotanaku7490@kimkotanaku7490 Жыл бұрын

  • Is it a kid or a woman as a narrator?

    @theverminator8048@theverminator80483 жыл бұрын

  • Russia is at number 1 as always...

    @albertdubrovsky9545@albertdubrovsky95454 жыл бұрын

    • Not always but its great.

      @olliepainter2155@olliepainter21554 жыл бұрын

    • Not really this list is just by weight of them being empty. The Tu-22 Blinder is actually retired and ths Tu-95 Bear can only carry 33,000 lbs of ordnance less then all there of the U.S. bombers and the Tu-160 White Swan carriers 96,208 lbs of ordnance which is only more then the B-52 Stratofortress and B-2 Spirit the B-1B Lancer carries 125,000 lbs of ordnance plus all three of the U.S. bombers have a wider variety of armament compared to the two chooses on the Tu-160 White Swan and four chooses of the Tu-95 Bear

      @TN_Whiskey@TN_Whiskey3 жыл бұрын

    • @@TN_Whiskey No, Tu-160 is the largest capacity. Search it. Holds the world record

      @jimallen9859@jimallen98592 жыл бұрын

    • @@jimallen9859 nope the lancer can carry 50,000lbs on its 6 external hard points and 75,000lbs in it's 3 internal bomb bays add it up and you 125,000lbs

      @TN_Whiskey@TN_Whiskey2 жыл бұрын

  • In space..... russia is the first 😁😁 not america !! 😄😄😄

    @uttamthapa2579@uttamthapa2579 Жыл бұрын

  • Realy I like this powerful bombardiers

    @ioanbota9397@ioanbota939710 ай бұрын

  • ' come on americans companys musts makes many more better power arms weapons to destroy all ussr russia arms weapons down

    @bestamerica@bestamerica2 жыл бұрын
KZhead