A Look Inside The Most Powerful Artillery Of All Time | Weapons That Changed The World | War Stories

2024 ж. 28 Сәу.
96 944 Рет қаралды

Explore the evolution of artillery, from ancient cannons to America's formidable M777 Howitzer. Join Wil Willis as he uncovers the secrets behind the lethal accuracy, versatility and firepower of these fearsome weapons.
00:00 Intro
01:35 M777 Howitzer
10:20 History Of Artillery
11:35 Swedish Leather Cannon
17:18 Napoleon’s Artillery
18:20 American Civil War
23:30 Driggs 1 pounder
28:20 WW1
30:20 WW2
31:30 Pack Howitzer
34:00 M119 Howitzer
36:00 Self-Propelled Howitzer
36:45 M109 howitzer
42:20 Nuclear Artillery
43:00 M101 Howitzer
War Stories is your one stop shop for all things military history. From Waterloo to Verdun, we'll be bringing you only the best documentaries and stories from history's most engaging and dramatic conflicts.
Discover the past on History Hit, with ad-free exclusive podcasts and documentaries released weekly and presented by world-renowned historians Dan Snow, Suzannah Lipscomb, Matt Lewis and more. Get 50% off your first 3 months with code 'WARSTORIES': historyhit.com/subscription
You can find more from us on:
/ warstoriesdocs
This channel is part of the History Hit Network. For any queries, please contact owned-enquiries@littledotstudios.com.
#warstories #documentary #military

Пікірлер
  • I was in SSG Rivera's first unit. We both re-enlisted to stay in First Infantry. Alpha Battery was a Brotherhood. 1-7 FA was a Fraternity we had to know our unit history and military protocol. Serving in that unit was the square foundation of my military career. I'm so proud of Rivera for making the Artillery his career.

    @crypto_que@crypto_queАй бұрын
  • Great show! As a retired Gunner I served on M105 and M109. Ubique!

    @ianwilson4286@ianwilson4286Ай бұрын
  • Decent documentary. Artillery deserves it's "atta-boys"!

    @robertdelacruz2951@robertdelacruz2951Ай бұрын
  • Flak 88 is what immediately comes to mind. Surprising to me that they didn't even mention it.

    @Haltzo@HaltzoАй бұрын
    • wehraboo cringe

      @AltCtrlSpud@AltCtrlSpudАй бұрын
    • Because it is not artillery. It was designated as Anti-Aircraft or Anti-Tank. These are direct fire weapons. Artillery is indirect.

      @JeepWrangler1957@JeepWrangler1957Ай бұрын
    • Like the name suggests the Flak88 is a "Flugabwehrkanone"- an Anti-aircraft gun. Also like JeepWrangler1957 correctly stated the Flak was used for direct fire unlike an atillery gun.

      @patrickkrohl3612@patrickkrohl3612Ай бұрын
    • ​​@@JeepWrangler1957the flak 88 can be used and was used for indirect fire though.

      @kimzgwapo7657@kimzgwapo7657Ай бұрын
    • Flak 88 was a much a waaaaaaaaay more advanced machine. 8^)

      @quoderatdemonstrandum5442@quoderatdemonstrandum5442Ай бұрын
  • I first served in the Florida Army National Guard in 1979. I was in B battery 1-116 FA out of Avon Park. We were 105 MM towed (M101A1). Most of our section chiefs were Vietnam veterans. I was assigned as a FIST team chief. We were a very good unit with a great reputation then. As good as a weapon system may be they are useless without good men and crews to operate them. I feel very proud to have served with those men in that unit!

    @russellparrish5745@russellparrish574525 күн бұрын
  • I used to watch this show when I was a kid. It used to air on Discovery Science channel. Love this show. This show made me a gun nut lmao

    @freebrums4018@freebrums4018Ай бұрын
  • Nice introduction about long ranges of artilleries characteristics...video focused on Hawtizer guns...as( battle king ) dealing with nearby enemies...

    @mohammedsaysrashid3587@mohammedsaysrashid3587Ай бұрын
  • You missed the M-110 8" self propelled howitzer.

    @thomascoy3195@thomascoy3195Ай бұрын
  • Gotta love artillery. The bigger the better!

    @aussiefan354@aussiefan354Ай бұрын
  • @34:27, that throw......... He will clean house in carnival games

    @kwan3560@kwan356017 күн бұрын
  • The Ukrainians have them and even them are impressed by the power of this artillery gun

    @dylanross5930@dylanross5930Ай бұрын
  • Incredible

    @dungeonquesting8075@dungeonquesting8075Ай бұрын
  • Forward observers are a highly prized target for snipers.

    @user-kk8vc9ck3t@user-kk8vc9ck3tАй бұрын
  • Retired gunner 🇬🇧 worked lance missile,light gun, FH70 & AS90 and also air defence systems javelin & rapier

    @pipmeister2103@pipmeister2103Ай бұрын
    • I had a friend that was with the British Lance crews. As you knew, the Americans controlled the nuclear warheads. He said the officers mess was an experience foreign to our O Clubs, but the troops were great. Did you ever fire a Lance? If so where? We in West Germany flew down to Crete and fired into the Mediterranean.

      @doughudgens9275@doughudgens927528 күн бұрын
    • @@doughudgens9275 yes fired lance in the outer Hebrides. We were based with the Americans in Menden near Dortmund

      @pipmeister2103@pipmeister210328 күн бұрын
  • as a german: now where is the big artillery the title promises? puny little toy guns. XDXDXD

    @billy5179@billy5179Ай бұрын
    • 😂 That's just super funny bc i know exactly what you're thinking about, the German's big,big, bad WW2 Guns. Thor, Big Bertha, & the biggest one of all, that i totally forgot the name but the shells we're like over a ton in weight. I need's to look up the names of those big Germán monsters but can you correct me if i'am wrong. Thank you and God bless you & your family always 🙏👍. PS; Can you tell me the one's you where thinking about that they did'nt mentioned on here, Thank you. 👍

      @raymondtorres-gy8uj@raymondtorres-gy8uj25 күн бұрын
    • @@raymondtorres-gy8uj I was thinking about "schwerer Gustav" and his sister "Dora". Biggest landbased artillery ever build. :) have a good one, my friend.

      @billy5179@billy517925 күн бұрын
    • ​@@billy5179I don't care if they ended up not being practical because of their immobility and time to set up, they were awesome pieces of destructive firepower and just go to show how advanced German manufacturing was at the time!

      @WhitestRob@WhitestRob12 күн бұрын
  • Drag Queen Story Hour is a CRUCIAL requirement for gun crew certification!

    @soundspartan@soundspartanАй бұрын
    • Is your makeup provided or do you buy your own?

      @atomicwedgie8176@atomicwedgie8176Ай бұрын
    • ha dont let out the secretes

      @davidmcnamara8759@davidmcnamara8759Ай бұрын
  • This looks like fun. Proper team work needed.👍

    @DT-wp4hk@DT-wp4hkАй бұрын
  • The ENIAC (development began in 1942, introduced in 1946) was not the first computer, it was the German Zuse Z3 (development began in 1938, introduced in 1941). The German army phased out such field guns decades ago. We have the Panzerhaubitze 2000 and Multiple Launch Rocket System (MLRS) mobile weapon system, which only requires five respectively three operators instead of ten. It's also strange to see that artillerymen don't wear hearing protection.

    @The_real_Marcoman@The_real_MarcomanАй бұрын
  • South African G6-Rhino 155mm anybody ?

    @maruissmall914@maruissmall914Ай бұрын
    • Looks pretty spesh..

      @johnnunn8688@johnnunn8688Ай бұрын
    • This is a video for the americans, if they dont see american weapon as the best they will throw a fit, note that they never mentioned that m777 is a british howitzer

      @Ikit1Claw@Ikit1Claw19 күн бұрын
    • And the G5??? Yrs ahead of it's time. But naturally nothing beats the big mouth yanks!!😂😂😂

      @user-ul3bj3ix9n@user-ul3bj3ix9n5 күн бұрын
  • King of Battle!!

    @hackedbyBLAGH@hackedbyBLAGHАй бұрын
  • How do they get the numbers that the forward observer gives them after he/they see the target?? Is it like GPS longitud, latitude cordinates?? Can someone please explain to me, always wanted to know...Thank you & God bless

    @raymondtorres-gy8uj@raymondtorres-gy8uj25 күн бұрын
  • Surprised that the M110, 8 in. Howitzer not mentioned. I served as a crew member on that one.

    @markcatlin-eg3kn@markcatlin-eg3kn17 күн бұрын
  • It's friggin will Willis!

    @jonathanseifert59@jonathanseifert5927 күн бұрын
  • Where is the German PZH2000, currently the best piece of artillery

    @KulinBan777@KulinBan777Ай бұрын
  • I ship out to Fort Sill in September for basic and ait to become a 13B (cannon crew member) as seen in this video. Hella excited

    @apollogamer9310@apollogamer931027 күн бұрын
    • Awesome! Hope you like Oklahoma while you’re here!

      @Dub1191@Dub119120 күн бұрын
  • anyone else up late playin wit they worm?

    @AltCtrlSpud@AltCtrlSpudАй бұрын
    • omg me

      @AltCtrlSpud@AltCtrlSpudАй бұрын
    • It's daytime though

      @hackedbyBLAGH@hackedbyBLAGHАй бұрын
    • Yep..with a bag on my head.

      @Chief-Dueef@Chief-DueefАй бұрын
    • He answered himself 😂

      @alexlarson6123@alexlarson612316 күн бұрын
  • History of Mortar, please ❤

    @trungbao8452@trungbao845211 күн бұрын
  • The 105 is very effective for avalanche control too. Helluva lot of fun to fire.

    @chevtruck1000@chevtruck100026 күн бұрын
  • No damn way those water buckets were 200yds. They were maybe 75 if that lol.

    @dhooter@dhooterАй бұрын
    • I just came here to type that exact thing in. That's at most 75 but looked closer, 50.

      @pointblank748@pointblank74823 күн бұрын
  • I don’t think a shell hit that car. I don’t think any shells were fired at that car. Just saying.

    @johnnunn8688@johnnunn8688Ай бұрын
    • Not enough recoil, no FDC computing fire commands, no map for the FO to determine coordinates, explosions vertical when viewed from the side, way to close to neighboring houses, yes it’s Hollywood.

      @doughudgens9275@doughudgens927528 күн бұрын
  • Woah

    @TheCosmicGuy0111@TheCosmicGuy0111Ай бұрын
  • I feel like a cave man for saying this, but that car boom at the end was awesome!

    @onebeartoe@onebeartoeАй бұрын
  • Awesome to see Fort Sill as an Oklahoman!

    @Dub1191@Dub119120 күн бұрын
  • Pound for pound it's still the German Flak 88 because of its versatility and power

    @michaelcodelmar9547@michaelcodelmar954716 күн бұрын
    • That was an anti-aircraft weapon that was pressed into direct fire use, totally outclassed in every possible way by an M777 and many others, so don't even waste your time.

      @WhitestRob@WhitestRob12 күн бұрын
  • Panzerhaubitze 2000 🎉🎉🎉

    @ChrisP.Austrian@ChrisP.Austrian3 күн бұрын
  • Entertaining and certainly worth watching, but hardly approaching the legend of "The Most Powerful Artillery Of All Time". I can think of at least 5 guns that didnt make it here and dwarf those on show (most of which wee made in Germany). :)

    @Veilingmeat@Veilingmeat28 күн бұрын
  • We need that in the EDCA sight, Philippines 🇵🇭🇺🇸 vs 🇨🇳...

    @sanaall0214@sanaall021429 күн бұрын
  • What if this artillery system bring back into 1861-1865?History will be changed

    @homelandfighters8541@homelandfighters854116 күн бұрын
  • Red Legs!

    @JeepWrangler1957@JeepWrangler1957Ай бұрын
  • Did Wil Willis uncover that M777 is a british howizer?

    @Ikit1Claw@Ikit1Claw19 күн бұрын
  • HIMAR has changed all that. As it can double back on it's self. To hit even the opening on the other side of the hill..

    @WizzRacing@WizzRacingАй бұрын
    • Rocket artillery are useful but way too expensive, heavy and slow to be as ubiquitous as guns

      @anon-iraq2655@anon-iraq2655Ай бұрын
    • @@anon-iraq2655The cost to man an Artillery is the cost. As it takes 7-9 people to operate. As you have to train them. Pay them. Then support them after they leave. The actual hardware is not the cost. And the reason HIMAR exist. It takes less personnel. Has a longer range. No barrel erosion to deal with. So no replacing the barrel every 900 rds. And the Vehicle cost less. And there is nothing slow about a HIMAR..

      @WizzRacing@WizzRacingАй бұрын
    • ​​​@@WizzRacing 1. Even if you consider the cost of labour, gun artillery is still cheaper. 2. There is a reason(two) for existence of rocket artillery: range and firepower. 3. Rocket artillery is slow to reload.

      @rajashashankgutta4334@rajashashankgutta433427 күн бұрын
    • @@rajashashankgutta4334 You can reload a HIMAR in 10 mins. And the cost is not cheap when you have 40,000 people to man an artillery brigade. As the cost to pay their Pension Fund and Medical Benefits once they leave is not cheap. It's 70% of the Military Budget. It's $551 Billion for them alone..

      @WizzRacing@WizzRacing27 күн бұрын
  • Looks like I picked the wrong field to park my car in.

    @FrankBoston@FrankBostonАй бұрын
  • And yes this is 6.3

    @katyusha9050@katyusha905029 күн бұрын
  • Whisky whiskey your drunk

    @alancervantes498@alancervantes498Ай бұрын
  • They forgot the French 75MM.

    @sfdeliveries76@sfdeliveries76Ай бұрын
  • God of battle!

    @pashapasovski5860@pashapasovski586016 күн бұрын
  • g5 g6 all the way

    @coenraadkruger2498@coenraadkruger2498Ай бұрын
  • Ferdinand got left out?

    @patmagh@patmaghАй бұрын
  • whiskey whiskey...

    @DopeDillah@DopeDillahАй бұрын
  • Animating the m982 round flattening out and flying and turning then going straight down is a little disingenuous guys, cmon

    @DJJ81@DJJ81Ай бұрын
  • Gustavus adulfus. Libera et impera!

    @draconian6692@draconian669214 күн бұрын
  • Never knew you could see the rounds heading down range. Sadly this is outdated. While the M777 is great at fighting technologically inferior foes the Russia/Ukraine conflict is re-writing everything we know. Drones may well have replaced artillery. The FOO is replaced by a drone with camera and your shells replaced with kamikaze drones. M777, Abrams, Leopards, Bradleys and Challenger 2s all burning, and at sea water based drones taking out Russian ships. Best to train for the NEXT war, not the past ones. We are at a technologically pivotal game changing time.

    @wfp9378@wfp9378Ай бұрын
  • Breaking news Beacon Tracker unjustified by Jamaica,England and America 2024 0

    @user-ek7uo5lr6p@user-ek7uo5lr6p15 күн бұрын
  • The only thing they have is lots of bodies

    @brotherscoobs@brotherscoobsАй бұрын
  • 777 to grat na wojnie na Ukrainie! Ruskie rozwalają to po pierwszym strzale! Radar artylerji znajdzie stanowisko lub dron i jest po stanowisku! Amen! Może w Afganistanie. Nic poza tym!

    @grzegorzrokita2330@grzegorzrokita2330Ай бұрын
  • Crew of 10? Titanium? 9000 pounds? Sorry, outdated, overpriced and a waste of titanium.

    @dt5735@dt5735Ай бұрын
  • early comment

    @THB1945@THB1945Ай бұрын
  • el

    @AncientRylanor69@AncientRylanor69Ай бұрын
  • Police are the standing army the founders warned about

    @manny2ndamendment246@manny2ndamendment246Ай бұрын
    • you mean like the local police dept? And their "plan" is what? Or am I misunderstanding your comment? I hope its the latter

      @Swellington_@Swellington_Ай бұрын
    • @@Swellington_I think hes just is mad at the police for warrants he got oh him 😂. Don’t know where the police topic comes in this vid myself😆🤪

      @SageShadow096@SageShadow096Ай бұрын
  • YOUR m1a1 Mission was BS the gun wasnt in action ... shame on your armorer ... also m1a1 are in use today in the Ukraine 2024

    @davidmcnamara8759@davidmcnamara8759Ай бұрын
  • Now all the US has to do is grow a spine and send some to Ukraine. Australia sent all theirs.

    @Steve1734@Steve1734Ай бұрын
  • The US has good weapons and can fight Iraq, the Houthis and so on. But dare not go to war with Russia and China, the best examples are the Korean War and the Ukraine war.

    @dieter3051@dieter3051Ай бұрын
    • US weaponry would devastate both adversaries at the same time.

      @hackedbyBLAGH@hackedbyBLAGHАй бұрын
    • Lol American air superiority would just decimate both without a single ground troop stepping into territory

      @armyman-ig7qs@armyman-ig7qsАй бұрын
    • The US has gone to war with both, in Korea and in Vietnam... In Korea it especially got the measure of the Chinese in the mountains during winter... And the US armed forces air arms fought the first dog-fights of the jet-age with the Russians... Read it up on some history, ignorance is a stinky suit 😤

      @ruddle-tango@ruddle-tangoАй бұрын
    • Air and sea domination they wouldn’t be able to get troops around if we don’t allow it we can fully incircle North America if need when you count ships and jet jets can fly a long way away from a carrier and can take fuel in the air and a B-52 B-2 B-1 can all fly 24 hour missions nonstop if needed we could honestly probably cover north and South America if needed honestly once you own the air you got it but once you own the air and sea it’s no chance

      @bradthackston5217@bradthackston5217Ай бұрын
    • Lol

      @Chris-tq2kx@Chris-tq2kxАй бұрын
  • Wait a minute… within the whole entire US military machine, there isn’t 1 black person who can lead an artillery fire team? Weather historical or contemporary? Not ONE!?😲… that’s not a good look Will… with all due respect. 🫡

    @kakodae6298@kakodae629828 күн бұрын
  • Great show! As a retired Gunner I served on M105 and M109. Ubique!

    @SkyAIChannel@SkyAIChannelАй бұрын
    • Royal artillery ? Ubique = everywhere ?

      @robertsolomielke5134@robertsolomielke513418 күн бұрын
  • Breaking news Beacon Tracker unjustified by Jamaica ,England and America 2024 0

    @user-ek7uo5lr6p@user-ek7uo5lr6p15 күн бұрын
KZhead