Why did Hitler declare War on the USA?

2024 ж. 11 Мам.
561 528 Рет қаралды

Why did Hitler declare war on the United States of America? What were his reasons?
»» GET OUR BOOKS ««
» Stukabook - Doctrine of the German Dive-Bomber - stukabook.com
» The Assault Platoon of the Grenadier-Company November 1944 (StG 44) - sturmzug.com
» Army Regulation Medium Panzer Company 1941 - www.hdv470-7.com
» Achtung Panzer? Zur Panzerwaffe der Wehrmacht - panzerkonferenz.de
»» SUPPORT MHV ««
» patreon - see videos early (adfree) - / mhv
» subscribe star - www.subscribestar.com/mhv
» paypal donation - paypal.me/mhvis
» KZhead Membership - / @militaryhistoryvisual...
»» MERCHANDISE ««
» teespring - teespring.com/stores/military...
» SOURCES & LINKS «
Syring, Enrico: Hitlers Kriegserklärung an Amerika vom 11. Dezember 1941, in: Michalka, Wolfgang: Der Zweite Weltrkrieg: Analyse - Grundzüge - Forschungsblilanz: S. 683-696
Goda, Norman J.: The Diplomacy of the Axis, 1940-1945, in: Cambridge History of the Second World War, Volume II, p. 276-300
Weinberg, Gerhard L.: German Strategy, 1939-1945, in: Cambridge History of the Second World War, Volume I, p. 107-131
Germany & The Second World War - Volume VI
Das Deutsche Reich und der Zweite Weltkrieg: Band 6: Der Globale Krieg - Die Ausweitung zum Weltkrieg und der Wechsel der Initiative 1941-1943
Roosevelt's Quarantine Speech Transcript (1937)
millercenter.org/president/spe...
» CREDITS & SPECIAL THX «
Song: Ethan Meixsell - Demilitarized Zone
#hitler #WhyHitler #unitedstates

Пікірлер
  • You are forgetting also Hitler declared war on the US in hopes Japan would join the war against the Soviet Union so the Russians would fight on two fronts but instead the Japanese signed a non aggression pact with Soviet Union and Hitler was furious.

    @StarTrooperZ22@StarTrooperZ224 жыл бұрын
    • Nein! nein! Nein!

      @MrYusu-jg2if@MrYusu-jg2if3 жыл бұрын
    • Fuhrerious

      @Joker-yw9hl@Joker-yw9hl3 жыл бұрын
    • That’s not true! Japan was axis power and never flipped side to Allies during ww2 and willing to fight until last man standing until 2 atomic bombs dropped and emperor had no choice. Never did Japan signed any non aggression pact. In fact one of the biggest mistake that Germany made was not communicating with Japan to launch attack on soviet eastern front.

      @bruceyung70@bruceyung703 жыл бұрын
    • @@bruceyung70 Yes, well, the Japanese were not interested plus they had a non-aggression pact with the USSR.

      @koookeee@koookeee3 жыл бұрын
    • @@koookeee The pact didn’t mean a damn to axis powers. Japan was focused on pacific Asian expansion as Germans were focused on Europe, North Africa and Middle East expansion. If I remember Germans also had non aggression pact with Stalin which was broken by hitler. My point is that startrioperz22 got few things wrong. His statement saying that Germany declared war on US hoping Japan would join war against Soviet was not right. Hitler joined the war after Japan already attacked Americans in Pearl Harbor and bearing straights in attu islands. If you study one of the biggest blunder of hitler is that he didn’t communicate with Japan to have them mow down Soviet from the eastern side.

      @bruceyung70@bruceyung703 жыл бұрын
  • he desperately needed the victory points

    @CrunchyNorbert@CrunchyNorbert7 жыл бұрын
    • CrunchyNorbert HOI4 reference lol

      @suryaprakash2126@suryaprakash21265 жыл бұрын
    • You don't need victory point if you don't declare war

      @pepebeezon772@pepebeezon7725 жыл бұрын
    • @@pepebeezon772 He's already in one, the War in Russia, and by December 1941 he knew it couldn't be won in a short time.

      @user-dc1ud6px3s@user-dc1ud6px3s5 жыл бұрын
    • But he could never take those war goals anyway

      @cheydinal5401@cheydinal54015 жыл бұрын
    • If you pre-decided that you were going to have the war no matter what Hitler actually preceded very rationally. It was merely this blind decision to have a war whether or not it could be won that was the issue. Germany was never going to be the equal or near equal to the USA before the USA intervened no matter how well the war went. Even if Hitler was parading through London and Moscow as soon as the US forces landed partisans would spring up like a wildfire. These occupied territories were not loyal. He'd face open rebellion as soon as they thought they had US support.

      @Arigator2@Arigator25 жыл бұрын
  • "Fuhrious" 😂😂😂

    @josuebarboza9809@josuebarboza98097 жыл бұрын
    • 1:31

      @josuebarboza9809@josuebarboza98097 жыл бұрын
    • Running out of "Öptions" I love this channel because of this humor.

      @LordVilmore@LordVilmore7 жыл бұрын
    • Josue Barboza I tried so hard not to laugh at that

      @chuckschultz3646@chuckschultz36467 жыл бұрын
    • Führious Öptions Blöddy hell

      @samwansitdabet6630@samwansitdabet66306 жыл бұрын
    • 1:31

      @alienx6106@alienx61066 жыл бұрын
  • Hitler also had the hope that showing his support for the Japanese would convince them to dedicate some land troops to the U.S.S.R. in the East reducing stress on his troops in Western Russia. Unfortunately for him, they were already overextended in other theatres.

    @douglasfels9789@douglasfels97894 жыл бұрын
    • Ha, ha, ha... Japanese land troops. smh

      @mousermind@mousermind4 жыл бұрын
    • If so, why didn't he just ask the Japanese to attack Russia instead of indirectly trying to provoke them to by Germany declaring war on the US...

      @johnscott353@johnscott3533 жыл бұрын
    • @@johnscott353 I have a friend that's an anime voice actor and business is handled more circumspectly in general in Japan. A Western style simple yes or no was probably not their first choice, leaving Hitler to guess... I've read that the diplomats did approach the subject, but I don't remember the details.

      @douglasfels9789@douglasfels97893 жыл бұрын
    • @@mousermind virgin.

      @seanncabin4902@seanncabin49023 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@douglasfels9789 That's a funny way to say "they were scared of USSR so they didn't try to provoke them". Red army won series of border battles against Japan's Imperial army in Manchuria before the 2ww started and Japan considered it humiliating enough to try and avoid any future conflict wit USSR. they to took it to the extend that ,every time a USA ship carried supplies for Soviets, Japan wouldn't attack it. Yah it's a response to a one year old comment

      @marcinkrz3140@marcinkrz31402 жыл бұрын
  • "the dangerous gamble and the rational choice are close together." I'm gonna use that sometime. Love it.

    @cavejohnson8665@cavejohnson86654 жыл бұрын
  • please a "hilter be Fuhrius" mug. 10/10 would buy those.

    @kirk_7632@kirk_76327 жыл бұрын
  • This is an exceptionally well-presented and informative channel. I wish I’d found it sooner-looks like I’ve got a lot of catching up to do.😁

    @maddog8356@maddog83562 жыл бұрын
    • Welcome aboard! That is an old video.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized2 жыл бұрын
  • I love your videos. There's so many KZheadrs that make videos on WWII that clearly have no idea what they're talking about.

    @jeffferreira1321@jeffferreira13216 жыл бұрын
  • I like how Hitler’s mustache is used as the dot for the “I” in Hitler

    @thebelugaman9572@thebelugaman95725 жыл бұрын
  • Short answer. Because the USA and japan declared war on each other

    @anguishedteen7836@anguishedteen78365 жыл бұрын
    • Short Answer: Because he is still stupid

      @Gerwulf97@Gerwulf975 жыл бұрын
    • @@Gerwulf97 - Because the USA and japan declared war on each other

      @PerezosoDoom@PerezosoDoom4 жыл бұрын
    • that is no answer at all. Japan didn´t declare war to Russia when Germany attacked Russia. Without the eastern troops Stalin would have lost Moscow in 1941 and probably the whole war. It would have been difficult for Roosevelt to declare war against Germay during the war aganinst Japan... So stupid Hitler helped Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin to defeat himself.

      @barfuss2007@barfuss20074 жыл бұрын
    • Say, wasn't there an answer from me in this thread, saying pretty much the same thing like barfuss2007? I am pretty sure I posted it. Is it still there and I can't see it, did somebody delete it or is this KZhead fucking up?

      @wjzav1971@wjzav19714 жыл бұрын
    • barfuss2007 The loss of Moscow would’ve literally meant nothing because they already failed to stop the USSR from transporting its factories to the Urals. The outrage of Americans after Pearl Harbor immediately raised support for interventionism and the USA would’ve entered the war in 1942 anyways.

      @jeffreyliu1648@jeffreyliu16484 жыл бұрын
  • While acknowledging the 1928 quote about the power of the US, my own experience with writing is that you can easily forget what you have once written, even over shorter spans of time. That Hitler realized that the US could only be defeated with massive resources back in 1928 does not mean he remembered that 13 years later.

    @diedertspijkerboer@diedertspijkerboer4 жыл бұрын
    • Also bear in mind that by 1941 Hitler did control the resources of the entire continent of Europe. And so, using his own logic, could be compared to US industrial power.

      @will2brown50@will2brown502 жыл бұрын
    • @@will2brown50 but those resources had to be used for the Russian invasion and other balkan countries. I'm pretty sure he meant that he needs all resources to defeat the US.

      @lenny7822@lenny78222 жыл бұрын
    • @@lenny7822 yes I think Hitler felt that the war in Russia was basically over by December 7th 1941.

      @will2brown50@will2brown502 жыл бұрын
    • The bottom line is that the US was already effectively at war with Germany by the end of 1941 so the declaration of war simply allowed Germany to more directly engage the US in the Atlantic.

      @nutyyyy@nutyyyy2 жыл бұрын
    • @@nutyyyy ehh I reject that. It would have been very difficult for Roosevelt to suggest putting millions of Americans in Europe against the Germans in what would have been an offensive war had Germany not declared war on them.

      @will2brown50@will2brown502 жыл бұрын
  • Love your videos man, and greatly appreciate that you provide sources!

    @OriginalWarwood@OriginalWarwood5 жыл бұрын
  • The Stahlhelm with the peace logo made me laugh, well done.

    @0utc4st1985@0utc4st19857 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks for the the clear explanation of this matter. I always wondered why.

    @tommy-er6hh@tommy-er6hh7 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome video man, thanks for these!

    @Keymaster2022@Keymaster20227 жыл бұрын
  • Hitler:* attackes the Soviet Union * Hey japan you wanna join? Japan: makes a anti attack treaty and attacks the USA Hitler ~ o#0 nein ~

    @user-ey3fv9do1n@user-ey3fv9do1n4 жыл бұрын
    • 🇺🇸 🔫🗡 💂🏻

      @cmds5604@cmds56043 жыл бұрын
  • I swore that he said Pornhub at 6:15

    @RealJustJason@RealJustJason7 жыл бұрын
    • Just Jason He did ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

      @xyphyofthewest8208@xyphyofthewest82086 жыл бұрын
    • {Xyphy of the West} LMAO. He said Pearl Harbor.

      @jackgrimaldi8685@jackgrimaldi86855 жыл бұрын
    • the first time i listen, i thought PHUB too, but the 2nd P.Harbor. @Josef Mengele

      @markindiana4220@markindiana42205 жыл бұрын
    • @@jackgrimaldi8685 r/wooooosh

      @grant8164@grant81645 жыл бұрын
    • 😂😂😂

      @bollywoodnews.@bollywoodnews.5 жыл бұрын
  • I absolutely love your videos. Have you ever done one dedicated to Guerrila Warfare? I would love to see the ins and outs of it because I find it so interesting.

    @iminyourhouserightnow.6526@iminyourhouserightnow.65267 жыл бұрын
    • not yet, but I was once quite interested in it and for years wanted to do a computer game on it. Although not on my short list.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
  • I recently discovered your channel. I find your information, presentation, and approach highly insightful and fascinating

    @notme3272@notme32724 жыл бұрын
  • As thorough a treatment of the topic as could be made, given the admitted lack of official documentation. Thoughtful and well presented as always.

    @johngeverett@johngeverett4 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you. I am something of a student of this and your analysis is about the most reasonable I have found.

    @robertrobertson7129@robertrobertson71297 жыл бұрын
    • thx, it is not really mine, I just summed up the an article and added some stuff, but since a lot of it is in German I didn't directly quote from it.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
  • 6:00 Running out of Öptions :D

    @kalks4334@kalks43347 жыл бұрын
    • funny fact, for quite many years that was actually how I pronounced that wörd...

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • Military History Visualized Well as far as i know, the O in "Word" is actually pronounced like a Ö

      @3uujh656@3uujh6567 жыл бұрын
    • 05x32 but not in Options/Optionen

      @Schrix@Schrix6 жыл бұрын
    • @@3uujh656 similar but not the same

      @wilmer89@wilmer895 жыл бұрын
    • Military History Visualized ökäy, thïs ïs ëpïc

      @bigsouthwind3949@bigsouthwind39494 жыл бұрын
  • I enjoy your presentations. Best wishes for every success! Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to All!!!

    @bringyourownbrilliance4353@bringyourownbrilliance43537 жыл бұрын
  • Wait this might be crazy, but could it be because japan did and they were allied?

    @metalema6@metalema67 жыл бұрын
    • watch the video

      @Khorney@Khorney7 жыл бұрын
    • "allied" the Japanese didn't told the Germans nothing. Also the Japanese uphold their treaties with the Soviet Union... The Axis was basically a dysfunctional and separated family, where they called each other when they needed something.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • To call the Axis members `Allies` is being generous. The Axis is more like a loose confederation of independent powers with similar goals who worked together when it was convenient but paid no consideration to the other powers in their own decision making.

      @marsnz1002@marsnz10027 жыл бұрын
    • They were "Allied" but not coordinating at the time (and they really never did much). Besides the AWESOME industrial might of the United States--that would be the strategic war--the day to day tactics of the Allies was fairly well coordinated, where as the Axis never combined their forces and expertise for effect very well. Germany and Japan mostly because of distance, Germany and Italy -- mostly because the two had nearly zero respect for one another. Yes, Germany put troops in Italy, but it never REALLY played as a team there.

      @scottgates4979@scottgates49797 жыл бұрын
    • Germany only deployed troops to Italy after the Italians switched sides.

      @marsnz1002@marsnz10027 жыл бұрын
  • Excellent work ! In fact at least since spring 1941 the USA was unilaterally at war in the Atlantic with Germany escorting British convoys, flying reconaissance and even attacking German U-boats. The highlight was Roosevelts official order in Sept. 9th 1941 to shoot at any German vessel. The declaration of war to the USA gave the German navy the choice to fight back to US aggressions.

    @berndf.k.1662@berndf.k.16627 жыл бұрын
    • He could simply ask the Navy to fight American vessels, like Roosevelt did, without a declaration of war

      @WilliamHouStudio@WilliamHouStudio4 жыл бұрын
    • When did Hitler worry abut diplomatic niceties?. While the Americans did not inflict any casualties the Germans sunk two American ships with hundreds of sailors dead.

      @charlesstuart7290@charlesstuart72904 жыл бұрын
    • @King Royal Very correct. Thanks.

      @berndf.k.1662@berndf.k.16622 жыл бұрын
    • @@WilliamHouStudio whats the point? after sinking a couple of american ships the US would declare war on them anyway

      @theend6966@theend69662 жыл бұрын
    • ​@@theend6966 they did sink american ships sending supplies to the british. And roosevelt was reluctant to join the war that even churchill was pissed

      @des_AT@des_AT Жыл бұрын
  • It's possible that Hitler's megalomania had gotten so bad by the end of 1941 that he was incapable of perceiving the accuracy of his own writings of 15 years earlier.

    @squamish4244@squamish42445 жыл бұрын
    • Doubtful. He also attempted to sign a peace treaty with Britain and the U.S in 1941 so he could attack the soviet union unimpeded by the west.

      @Bitchslapper316@Bitchslapper3163 жыл бұрын
  • Thanks. As always I learned a lot from your video.

    @alitahir4147@alitahir41474 жыл бұрын
  • Which tool do you use for your presentation/visualization? I really like it!

    @Wildeskraut@Wildeskraut7 жыл бұрын
  • Very good analysis. I agree entirely with your argument.

    @jasonallen1712@jasonallen17127 жыл бұрын
  • He watched the man in the high castle and thought he could reenact the show

    @brianmo2965@brianmo29655 жыл бұрын
    • That starts getting kind of meta. He's currently at war, sees a depiction of a universe where he's won the war but also has scenes of _another_ universe where the war ended in a loss for him...

      @mousermind@mousermind4 жыл бұрын
    • The only way they win is if they get the bomb first like in the book

      @noticemesenpai69@noticemesenpai693 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for shedding light on this poorly discussed topic.

    @blessedtraveler537@blessedtraveler5375 жыл бұрын
  • Perhaps he hoped his DOW against the USA would encourage the Japanese to join his war against the USSR. A Japanese offensive in Siberia would tie down several Soviet divisions.

    @michaelhorning6014@michaelhorning60145 жыл бұрын
    • Finally someone who knows what they are talking about. Hitler needed a second front against the Russians in order to deliver a knockout punch and take Moscow. Seeing Japan bomb Pearl Harbor, he thought if he also declared war on the US, the Japanese would open a front in Russian Siberia.

      @nick56677@nick566774 жыл бұрын
    • Heath N well, the United States were fucking going in on the Japanese while we were also in Europe so they couldn’t rly do anything and right before we’d just won over Italy

      @nikn1250@nikn12504 жыл бұрын
    • @@nick56677 Japan was already dealing with the United States at the time, aswell as having an ongoing war in Asia, so I don't know if they would've been too up to task to put their soldiers through icey tundra whilst having to deal with 2 major other things at the same time.

      @Nicholaskgaming@Nicholaskgaming4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Nicholaskgaming I know the history, I'm saying the Japanese could've used a smokescreen offensive in Siberia, if they had, Stalin wouldn't have moved his Siberian forces to East Europe, which in turn changed the war

      @nick56677@nick566774 жыл бұрын
    • @@nick56677 sorry if I sound dumb here but what's a smokescreen?

      @Nicholaskgaming@Nicholaskgaming4 жыл бұрын
  • Another great video MHV and I thank you! You are the first person I have ever heard that believes the act was not that of a madman. In my humble opinion; 1. Your focus on the U-Boat Campaign was spot on as, in the winter of 1941/42, that campaign was firmly under Nazi control. 2. (In My Opinion) - Should Japan be able to force America into a negotiated peace within the next 6-9 months (which was Japan's objective) then Germany, as a declared ally, could ask that the end of lend lease be included into the negotiations. While it was a long shot, it was the only shot Germany had at putting the USA out of the war.

    @mattmischnick2926@mattmischnick29265 жыл бұрын
  • He may have underestimated the capability of the U.S. I know you addressed this in the video but I'm talking about the ability of the U.S to fight a multi front war on both sides of the planet. He may have thought the U.S would be tied up in the Pacific and would not move on Europe, at least not for a long time. The war declaration gave his military full legal rights to attack U.S assets in Europe and at sea.

    @Bitchslapper316@Bitchslapper3163 жыл бұрын
  • Great presentation. 👍Thank you!

    @KOLDBLU3ST33L@KOLDBLU3ST33L4 жыл бұрын
  • Another great video MHV and I thank you! You are the first person I have ever heard that believes the act was not that of a madman. In my humble opinion; 1. Your focus on the U-Boat Campaign was spot on as, in the winter of 1941/42, that campaign was firmly under Nazi control. In fact, with the war declaration came Operation Drumbeat which was also called "The Second Happy Time" by German submariners. There was a strong belief that this serious disruption of lend-lease combined with a major summer offensive (Case Blau) would be enough to force Russia to at least force Russia into a negotiated peace. (Remember, they did not have the God's-gift of hindsight that we all possess now). 2. (In My Opinion) - Should Japan be able to force America into a negotiated peace within the next 6-9 months (which was Japan's objective & a totally realistic possibility in 12/41) then Germany, as a declared ally, could ask that the end of lend lease be included into the negotiations. While it was a long shot, it was the only shot Germany had at putting the USA out of the war. Every major country in the world knew of the U.S. industrial might by the 1930's because every major country traded with the US. What they didn't realize was the absolute lightning speed at which the US was not only able to shift their industry into a wartime footing (less than eight months) AND to create an delivery industry on an unheard of scale (Liberty Ship Building) that would allow all that wartime material to be delivered in a timely manner. (Because if you can't get to where it needs to go, then what good does all the guns, ammo, fuel and food do anyone?)

    @mattmischnick2926@mattmischnick29265 жыл бұрын
  • Japan: "I bOmdEd PeArl HaRbOr!!!" Germany and Italy: "You what?" ...

    @AmishGangsterWith_a_Hellcat@AmishGangsterWith_a_Hellcat4 жыл бұрын
  • Because we had been giving materiel, money and aid to his enemies for years without declaring war formally ourselves?

    @spybreak23@spybreak234 жыл бұрын
    • hey idiot there was American companies that aided the Germans too .. America wasn't just giving materials to Germany's enemies I.G. Farben a German company who supplied 80% of the explosives for germany was partnered with Rockefeller's U.S. Standard Oil Co. the German air force could not operate without a fuel additive made by U.S. Standard Oil Co. ... so you keep on believing the bullshit with out doing any of the research .. moron

      @KenMabie@KenMabie4 жыл бұрын
    • @@KenMabie I see you are just copying and pasting that nasty comment... nice

      @kyle18934@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
    • the US was still in trading relations with the UK so not sure why they thought being at war with the UK would stop trade from happening. And prior to the Declaration of war from Hitler the US was still free to trade from what I know with Germany. The only real undeclared war part is the US patrolling the Atlantic but even that is shaky as there was a time or two the US had spotted German ships and could've fired but didn't.

      @joesmith701@joesmith7014 жыл бұрын
    • @@joesmith701 I mean "as long as you dont hurt me I wont hurt you" is a pretty good motto. It makes since that the us navy would protect u.s. interests but not engage when not necessisary

      @kyle18934@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
    • Seriously? This question has an obvious answer. Hitler depended on Japanese aid with their army threatening easter Russian holdings. The Japanese refused his offers, but he tried to make it work. Hitler failed and the Japanese signed a secret deal with the Soviets, which freed up Soviet divisions in the east, which they brought west and counter attacked in the Winter, stopping and pushing back German forces short of Moskow. That simple Hitler wanted Japanese help, and he badly misjudged them, simplifying US political problems in attacking Germany and aiding the allies; and gaining nothing for it. Bottom line, Hitler totally screwed up, making a decision which greatly aided his enemies, and gained himself little or nothing.

      @britts9215@britts92153 жыл бұрын
  • Howdy! I'm sorry if this comes across as disrespectful or unkind, as neither are my intent. I really enjoy watching your videos and appreciate your well researched, insightful content. I often find myself having difficulty understanding your accent. You have a lovely sounding voice, but your English accent is sometimes difficult to understand. I would really appreciate closed captions, as to understand you better. I think ESL viewers might get even more utility from captions than native-English speakers, like myself. Regardless, thanks for all you do, I appreciate your work. Sorry if I sounded mean. :(

    @DAndyLord@DAndyLord7 жыл бұрын
  • Not long after he declared war on the USA in early 1942 at a meeting Fritz Todt told Hitler with tears in his eyes that the war was inevitably lost as both Russia and the USA produced 5 or 6 times the amount of bombers as Germany. Todt left shortly after and Albert Speer was due to leave with him but Hitler persuaded Speer to stay and the plane Todt left on mysteriously blew up.

    @alexbowman7582@alexbowman75824 жыл бұрын
  • well american ships were bringing war supplies to britain

    @paulstewart7529@paulstewart75296 жыл бұрын
    • paul stewart but that not war. Because multiple neutral countries supplied Germany.

      @stevennguyen5771@stevennguyen57715 жыл бұрын
    • Steven Nguyen, really? Which ones?

      @hishamseddiqee9528@hishamseddiqee95284 жыл бұрын
    • leonidGorbachev Xd the Soviet Union supply them with oil before operation Barbarossa, Spain have volunteers to fight for the axis and supply them with tungsten, and Sweden allow them to use they railroads and supply them with iron.

      @stevennguyen5771@stevennguyen57714 жыл бұрын
    • Steven Nguyen, Soviet Union giving oil to the Germans in return for something else is called Trade. Members from the fascist paramilitary of Spain would join up with the Germans, Germans had enough people anyways and it was nothing compared to how the Americans were supporting the British and fighting Germans without declaring war. Sweden allowing Germans to taken Iron ore and heavy water was also called trade. Germans would use iron and heavy water to improve infrastructure more than create weapons, as they had no need for them because they had enough. Again, the support for the English from ALL of it’s colonies and secret allies and Allies was nothing compared to the 3 neutral countries you told me were “supplying” Germany

      @hishamseddiqee9528@hishamseddiqee95284 жыл бұрын
    • Yeah and the United States would be economically crushed without these trading routes running

      @nikn1250@nikn12504 жыл бұрын
  • He declared war because the US was already at war with Germany lol.

    @Slippindisc@Slippindisc7 жыл бұрын
    • MrAdvantage1 That makes no sense.

      @june6445@june64457 жыл бұрын
    • Uh no, The US did not join the war after Pearl Harbor. Before that, the US was declared a neutral country. Germany declared war after the retaliation from the US, after the attack in Pearl Harbor. The US only supplied The UK with artillery.

      @SupaDupaaFlyy@SupaDupaaFlyy7 жыл бұрын
    • "He had to be revoted" What? Are you implying somehow that the US WANTED to go to war with Germany?The reason why even the UK got involved, was because Hitler had Invaded entirely Chzechoslovakia. The British own interests didn't conflict with the US. So it would be in both parties best interest to support each against a common enemy. Read the *Munich Agreement*. Hitler had a chance to settle with a diplomatic solution, yet he just went along with it because at that moment in time, his army wasn't strong enough to take on the UK-US.

      @SupaDupaaFlyy@SupaDupaaFlyy7 жыл бұрын
    • What reading that Nazi propaganda website. No thanks, I rather not believe in fairytales and go by actual facts. Go read the the *Munich agreement* I'm pretty sure HItler kept his promise on that one. lol

      @SupaDupaaFlyy@SupaDupaaFlyy7 жыл бұрын
    • The US didn't want to go to war? The McCollum Memo says otherwise

      @Slippindisc@Slippindisc7 жыл бұрын
  • Awesome vid!!!

    @vemethh3110@vemethh31107 жыл бұрын
  • Good vid! I had always assumed that the Tripartate Pact was Hitler's motivation. How silly of me to think that he did anything because of a signature on a piece of paper!

    @wordsmithgmxch@wordsmithgmxch5 жыл бұрын
  • "We are struggling in the Atlantic and on the Eastern Front. Let's declare war on the Americans!" Fucking tactical genius there. No wonder he lost.

    @Fredfredbug4@Fredfredbug47 жыл бұрын
    • Fredfredbug4 Well he wanted to attack the American escorts

      @JohnSmith-yc3hi@JohnSmith-yc3hi7 жыл бұрын
    • Paulus encircled in 1941? You mean end of 1942, Stalingrad, right?

      @elixir4487@elixir44877 жыл бұрын
    • Your comment above seems to mislead in this direction. "Beginning of the end for the Germans was by November 19, when Paulus..." It looked like for me you meant 19th November, 1941

      @elixir4487@elixir44877 жыл бұрын
    • Allright, have a nice day!

      @elixir4487@elixir44877 жыл бұрын
    • Actually Hitler was driven in the first place by his perception of the germans as the better race. Nothing he did was rational thinking. Declaring war made him feel glorius and powerful. Surely it helped him to forget the disaster at Stalingrad.

      @JakobFischer60@JakobFischer607 жыл бұрын
  • Good video and pretty interesting discussions in the comment section.

    @jeromevillaflor3896@jeromevillaflor38967 жыл бұрын
  • Here's an idea. Could you make a video explaining the organization, functions and employment of various higher level commands in World War 2? Namely Corps, Armies and Army Groups. In other words, how the chain of command from High Command to division worked.

    @SaintJavelin2022@SaintJavelin20227 жыл бұрын
    • added to the good questions list, but may take a while. Got loads of books recently and I really need to start reading. Too often I start digging to find answers for good questions like yours, but more often than not this takes way too long.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_organization#Modern_hierarchy Just read the table there, it's accurate enough. Bigger units are made up of smaller units, the unit sizes are approximate and vary depending on the army in question, and some nations skipped certain size units.

      @acommunityofhermits@acommunityofhermits7 жыл бұрын
  • AS always fascinating , Please , please can we have more !

    @welshpete12@welshpete127 жыл бұрын
  • Very rational and fact based analysis. There were two main strategic calculations...1) the US could not enter the European theater in force for at least a year, which was correct (north africa in Nov 42, italy in summer 43) by which time the war would be decided in the east. In the meantime Germany could at last legally interdict US Atlantic convoys 2) it was hoped Japan would reciprocate by declaring war on the USSR and attacking the Soviet far east - which they did not. Lastly Hitler's address declaring war is interesting reading, being a litany of US violations of neutrality and like his opponents, framing the war as a larger civilizational struggle.

    @ExVeritateLibertas@ExVeritateLibertas4 жыл бұрын
  • Please make a video about the naval war in the Mediterranean Sea.

    @zanzao-1ps318@zanzao-1ps3187 жыл бұрын
    • I will definitely cover some of that stuff, but nothing immediately planned. Although looked several times into Malta and Crete, although the later is not really naval war. Got "Sea Power" today, maybe Taranto... "the Pearl Harbor of the Mediterranean" ;)

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • Military History Visualized Okay and thanks for the answer :-)

      @zanzao-1ps318@zanzao-1ps3187 жыл бұрын
  • By the time of the Pearl Harbor attack, Germany was beginning to face a stalled campaign on the eastern front. It was also beginning to face a hard Russian winter. Surely, Hitler would have been aware of the power of the US, if only because he himself was a WWI veteran. Adding to this bigger equation, after Pearl Harbor, Hitler was heard to remark that Japan had never lost a war. A point you did not make was that Japan had already defeated Russia earlier in the 20th century. Japan was already on Russia's doorstep having occupied Manchuria. The major point you left out was, Hitler hoped his declaration of war against the US, opening two fronts for the US, would cause the Japanese to declare against Russia, opening a far eastern front for Russia, easing the German position in Russia. Respectfully, I think this was a bigger reason than any you cite.

    @frankhoffman3566@frankhoffman35664 жыл бұрын
  • December 7th 1941, Then America went on to win a War on two fronts and bring it all to an end.

    @shinjaokinawa5122@shinjaokinawa51224 жыл бұрын
    • @James Henderson Because Stalin was willing to sacrifice every man women and child to put as big as a gap between him and the german Wehrmacht. not to mention the red army was literally starving and half of them didn't even have a weapon before the Americans had to aid them.

      @blackhole9961@blackhole99614 жыл бұрын
    • @@blackhole9961 US help to the Soviet union was only about 5% of the the USSR total war production. You are forgetting that in the most critical year of 1941 the soviets fought alone. The lend lease began in 1942 and didnt arrive in huge quantities till 1943. Sorry to break it to you but the soviets single handedly defeated the german war machine. It is quite sad that many people have been brainwashed by US films and tv shows that the US won the war while the red army killed 80% of the german soldiers.

      @KillerofWestoids@KillerofWestoids3 жыл бұрын
  • another great video. Thank-you

    @Kaiserbill2@Kaiserbill27 жыл бұрын
  • "Judea declares war on Germany" - 1933

    @asuraazoth7137@asuraazoth71374 жыл бұрын
    • Too many people don't know this and shrug it off. Makes my blood boil

      @ACM-sp1gh@ACM-sp1gh4 жыл бұрын
    • Neo nazi detected , News flash nazi germany lost and lost badly because of their ridiculous racial policies

      @mathewkelly9968@mathewkelly99684 жыл бұрын
  • Can you do a video on Foco tactics?

    @youngstalin1310@youngstalin13107 жыл бұрын
  • I video on the reasons and tactical situation for the invasion of Norway , and the Artic naval battles during the Murmansk convoys would be Great

    @sivaro1@sivaro17 жыл бұрын
  • He did not, FDR declared war on Germany Sept 11 when he issued a "shoot on sight" order for German submarines. That constitutes a declaration of war. Hitler also did not declare war on England or France.

    @maynardfrench5418@maynardfrench54184 жыл бұрын
    • He kind of did actualy declare war on France and Britain, though not litteraly since it was clearly established that they would go to war over poland, and he attacked them anyways

      @superzebrasuperzebra@superzebrasuperzebra4 жыл бұрын
    • USA were the bad guys in that war.

      @jonclarkson5911@jonclarkson59114 жыл бұрын
    • @@jonclarkson5911 in what sense were they worse than the axis?

      @superzebrasuperzebra@superzebrasuperzebra4 жыл бұрын
    • Jon Clarkson ....war was declared on them...so how does that make them the “bad” guys?....though they probably should have also annihilated Stalin while the chance was there....as Patton suggested...

      @zeroceiling@zeroceiling4 жыл бұрын
    • James Henderson ...James..FDR gave the “shoot on sight” order specifically in targeting German submarines found unofficially in US territorial waters. Do you suggest that these acts by Germans were supposed to just be tolerated? If I, as a rancher, used to put up a sign stating that trespassers / rustlers would be shot on sight...is that a declaration of war? Does it not mean that if there is no trespassing, no hostilities will be undertaken? In other words, it’s easy not to be in a conflict by simply respecting a countries stated “defensive imperative.” I believe that this directive would be directed at virtually any country systematically entering US territorial waters...in an armed war implement such as a submarine. As it so happened, it was only Germany that was doing this consistently.

      @zeroceiling@zeroceiling4 жыл бұрын
  • Sounds a bit like a "Leeroy Jenkins!" situation.

    @lewisirwin5363@lewisirwin53636 жыл бұрын
  • Why did Hitler think that the US would declare war against Germany in 1942? Given that the US was already at war against Japan this would have been most unlikely.

    @hypothebai4634@hypothebai46344 жыл бұрын
    • he wasn't very intelligent. A charismatic and a good actor, but not very smart.

      @christianhoffmann8607@christianhoffmann86074 жыл бұрын
    • @@christianhoffmann8607 That may be true. But I think that Hitler was more strategically aware than most of the German military and government. For instance I have read somewhere that the US entry into the war was not noted by any German generals in their diaries. And it seemed to have occurred without any acknowledgement within Germany as a whole.

      @hypothebai4634@hypothebai46344 жыл бұрын
  • Can you do IF naval warfare was still focused at battleships,that battleships are still the key to naval warfare.That may lead to ships that was planned but wasn't built because they built aircraft carries instead of the ships planned,like the USS Montana.

    @sake5140@sake51407 жыл бұрын
  • FDR declared war on Japan and Germany the moment he signed the Lend Lease Act. With this act he made it possible for Britan to buys goods in the USA and pay them later.

    @mark12strang58@mark12strang586 жыл бұрын
    • Don't be a fool. Germany could have bought to. But Canada and England would have attacked any German freighters crossing the Atlantic Ocean.

      @rutabagasteu@rutabagasteu5 жыл бұрын
    • rutabagasteu Don’t expect nazi apologists to listen to reason

      @counterfit5@counterfit55 жыл бұрын
    • @@rutabagasteu If a friend supported the guy who was going to duel with you in a boxing match wouldn't you be at least a little skeptical of that person?

      @justmonika2345@justmonika23455 жыл бұрын
  • I am finally starting to understand your accent SUBSCRIBED

    @nowdid@nowdid7 жыл бұрын
  • " the options for chancellor were so small that the dangerous gamble and rational decision were quite close together" excellent writing !

    @daxmac3691@daxmac3691 Жыл бұрын
  • I'd like to add the fact that while the US Navy was first class in December 1941 the US Army and the USAAF were very poor and needed to be built up to become a useful instrument of war. So from the German perspective these branches of the American military weren't an immediate threat. This adds to your narritive, because the declaration of war allowed Germany to engage the Americans in the North Atlantic and to focus on bringing down the Soviet Union while at the same time there was no immediate danger of Allied landings in Europe or an American strategic aerial campaign against Germany. Those started not before spring/summer 1943 at which the war against the Soviet Union was lost anyway.

    @hstf@hstf7 жыл бұрын
  • Roosevelt's speech was in 1937 that's 1937 two full years before ww2 - I think he wanted a confrontation with Germany long before Poland...

    @geraldgriffin8220@geraldgriffin82206 жыл бұрын
    • The isolationists. would have forced him out of office.

      @rutabagasteu@rutabagasteu5 жыл бұрын
    • Gerald Fallon-Griffin Germany and Japan were all ready doing a lot of dodgy shit well before the invasion of Poland. The operations within Germany alone were reason enough to see them as a threat

      @conors4430@conors44305 жыл бұрын
    • @@conors4430 yeah the way how Hitler dealt with opposition in Germany alone was pretty staggering. Then gives the finger to the WHOLE treaty of Versailles, and the allies didn't do shit about it till shit went down with Poland, but even THEN the allies didn't really do shit. Then about two weeks later and UP the germans are in Paris, welp I guess we'll pack up back home and call it a day, better get America on the phone, I doubt they'd want to miss this.

      @ilikewindows3455@ilikewindows34555 жыл бұрын
    • @@ilikewindows3455 the fact france signed a treaty with russia before the invasion of poland voided the other treaty. Plus Britain and france signed a aid agreement with poland then did nothing after. Plus russia invaded poland also yet france and britan sided with the soviets so it was all a set up by britan to force germany into a conflict

      @trossk@trossk5 жыл бұрын
    • @@trossk the Polish got cucked at the end of the war as well. Weren't even invited in the celebration march

      @ilikewindows3455@ilikewindows34555 жыл бұрын
  • It is actually amazing in a way that Germany lasted as long as it did during the war. Japan did nothing to assist in German operations. Italy was content on marching her poorly led and poorly armed troops through the deserts of Africa until the British stepped in and the Italians needed German assistance. Really, the only allies of any use to Germany was Romania and Hungary, as they had a common goal with Germany. You could also argue Finland, although they and Germany were more belligerents than allies to each other.

    @oilersridersbluejays@oilersridersbluejays7 жыл бұрын
    • The power of propaganda, training, guile, tactics, innovation, and appeasement.

      @richardkmetz8928@richardkmetz89287 жыл бұрын
    • Grundy Malone They didn’t have the oil supplies to last much longer than they did. Sure, they’d save some by not invading the USSR, but the US/UK bombing campaign against the German oil production facilities was extremely successful, at least according to several Nazi leaders.

      @counterfit5@counterfit55 жыл бұрын
    • By 1943, the Germans were, essentially, on the defensive. Especially after Kursk. While fuel may be necessary to operate their vehicles, the other issue was manpower. But yes, its impressive how the Germans fought for 6 years straight against three major powers and industries, and still managed to force them into a bloody bludgeoning match that would see serious total war level operations. The only mistake the US and GB made was not going after the Soviet Union, knowing damn well they would be a threat because of their leader.

      @JohnDoe-wt9ek@JohnDoe-wt9ek2 жыл бұрын
  • Thank you for the manner in which you have prepared and presented the facts(reasons) that Hitler declared war on the United States of America. Well done sir. Bless you and work.

    @horsepukey@horsepukey4 жыл бұрын
  • I was wondering if you could do a further video on the current ability of Britain and France to conduct military operations anywhere in the world (if they can and/or under what limitations). The reason why I ask is that from what I understand they, along with the USA are the only 3 nations capable of global military operations with states like India, China and Russia are only regional military powers. Its just a topic I'm interested in and thought it might interest others to.

    @marcus7564@marcus75647 жыл бұрын
  • I can already tell there are going to be wehraboos in the comments before even watching the video.

    @Bcso591@Bcso5917 жыл бұрын
    • you dont like the trueth, schlomo ?

      @Peipzz@Peipzz5 жыл бұрын
    • @@Peipzz your spelling shows just how uneducated you are right off the bat.😂🤣😅

      @keelyleilani1326@keelyleilani13264 жыл бұрын
  • He declared because his war goal almast expired

    @chrisretro8599@chrisretro85994 жыл бұрын
  • Hitler or Germany did never underestimated capabilities of US,they just honored their alliance with Japan and they thought Japan would attack on Soviet Union but they didn’t.

    @erichvonmanstein1952@erichvonmanstein19524 жыл бұрын
  • Good Work

    @ahlussunnahapologetics3230@ahlussunnahapologetics32304 жыл бұрын
  • One factor too often overlooked is that the US Navy had been attacking German vessels in international waters since late Spring of 1940. That was on Roosevelt's direct orders. Roosevelt needed a major war to undo the harm his economic policies had done to America, which had actually worsened the economic depression here.

    @kevins1114@kevins11144 жыл бұрын
    • The thing is though Roosevelt had every right the shoot down those submarines they were illegally in American Waters

      @highcouncil1302@highcouncil13024 жыл бұрын
    • @@highcouncil1302 You seem to have misread my comment. If you try reading it again, you may notice I said "In INTERNATIONAL waters", and that it was being done BEFORE December 7, 1941.

      @kevins1114@kevins11144 жыл бұрын
    • @@kevins1114 the submarines entered American Waters under the maritime law Roosevelt had every right to order them shot down

      @highcouncil1302@highcouncil13024 жыл бұрын
    • @@highcouncil1302 You're STILL refusing to address the situation of the unprovoked attacks in INTERNATIONAL waters. What is painfully obvious here is that you are just a sad little troll who has nothing better to do than show your glaring lack of knowledge of history. It's time to give the computer back to your mother, and go outside and play.

      @kevins1114@kevins11144 жыл бұрын
    • @@kevins1114 not a troll just stating the facts German ships entered American Waters illegally and we're shot down

      @highcouncil1302@highcouncil13024 жыл бұрын
  • Is because Japan and tripartite which requires mutual declaration of war to any enemies of the pact Read this as a joke guys but if I'm right then ahaha

    @Kriegter@Kriegter4 жыл бұрын
    • And that idea is what made ww1 so bad. Alliances after alliances to the point that the world was tied down with them. Sorry random comment

      @kyle18934@kyle189344 жыл бұрын
    • No the Pact only required coming to the aid of a signer by all means including military if another signer was attacked by a power not currently involved in the European or China/Japan wars. In other words if the USA or USSR attacked an Axis member the rest of the Axis had to help the fight. But the Pact did not require going to war if an Axis member was the attacker instead of the victim.

      @IrishCarney@IrishCarney4 жыл бұрын
  • 1:33 XD That pun.

    @Mint-Lynx@Mint-Lynx7 жыл бұрын
  • Hitler traded a short term tactical advantage for a long term strategic disadvantage. One of the reasons Operation Drumbeat was so successful was the Pacific Fleet ships operating in the Atlantic had already transited back to the Pacific. Two fleet carriers were left in the Atlantic. USS Wasp made it's second delivery of Spitfires to Malta in May 1942 at the same time as the Battle of the Coral Sea and US forces in the Philippines surrendered. With the USA focused on Japan, the Neutrality Patrol and Lend Lease would have disappeared except for LL to Britain in Asia. Even the sale of weapons was doubtful as the US military was is competition with LL before December 1941.

    @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38024 жыл бұрын
    • en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plan_Dog_memo

      @nickdanger3802@nickdanger38024 жыл бұрын
  • I’ve often wondered about this in my 64 years, having talked with many WW2 veterans (some of who didn’t know Hitler declared war on the U.S. the day after Pearl Harbor). You cover the points very well into what must have been going on in Hitler’s mind in 1941 (this is before you can say he was making REALLY bad decisions under the influence of amphetamines-becoming a “speed freak”) . I think he over estimated what the Kriegsmarine’s submarine warfare capabilities were. The Kriegsmarine was totally caught by surprise and it took 3 weeks to get submarines off the U.S. Coast. I believe Hitler thought “Good” “America will know what it is like to fight a two front War”. But No, I don’t think he really understood what a colossal industrial power America was at the time. Had he not declared war on the U.S. Roosevelt would have been in a pickle. There was a not insignificant portion of the American public who wanted nothing to do with the European war. When the Japanese had actually attacked us, and killed thousands of Americans, public opinion would have required FDR to ignore the European war and concentrate on Japan. People like Charles Lindbergh would have been loudly proclaiming it. By declaring war on the United States, Hitler played right into Roosevelt’s hands and made his, and Germany’s defeat inevitable. Roosevelt turned America’s industrial power against Germany first.

    @jonathanhansen3709@jonathanhansen37095 жыл бұрын
  • Never forget that my country (USA) Roosevelt went on a long campaign of antagonism. whether it be embargoing the japanese or jailing of German civilians from merchant ships. Roosevelt was looking for any way to get into the war, the death of 2400 sailors was a great way for him, despite knowing we broke the japanese naval code prior to this. Also never forget that Roosevelt also recognized the Soviet Union (a country that considered the US an enemy) in 1933-4 the same years that the collectivization edict was in it's height in the Ukraine which killed millions of Ukrainians.

    @AtlasAugustus@AtlasAugustus7 жыл бұрын
    • Look up the word "realism" - there was a world war going on, not some civil war in some remote hellhole :P

      @hjorturerlend@hjorturerlend7 жыл бұрын
    • Darion Johnston FDR was a massive piece of shit. He tried to pack the Supreme Court, violated the gentleman's agreement only run two terms and push the country towards socialism. He was the worst. As always, getting the US into a war is always an alternative to fixing bad domestic policy. The crippled socialist wanted a war and the war we were going to have.

      @gregorybarton3550@gregorybarton35507 жыл бұрын
    • Now, get to the bad parts.

      @WhiteCamry@WhiteCamry7 жыл бұрын
    • wait... so you'd be against the US embargoing Japan? Have you seen what Japan did to the Chinese, Koreans, and South East Asians? The US should embargo and put sanctions on any nation that does such atrocities (or go in to stop them by force if the world won't grow some back bone).

      @Gorilder@Gorilder7 жыл бұрын
    • By that logic why didn't the USA embargo itself for invading and committing atrocities in Puerto Rico, Kingdom of Hawaii (who was their ally), China (during the Opium Wars) then later exclusion under the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. The USA was an Imperialist power just like Japan and Germany, yet tried to act like it wasn't.

      @tcc5750@tcc57507 жыл бұрын
  • What if Hitler had negotiated with the US against the Japanese after the attack and gone against the agreement. Interesting hypothetical situation and one I’ve wondered about

    @s.thompson9@s.thompson94 жыл бұрын
    • James Henderson Yes but only with Japan initially. Hitler would have first had to have reached a peace agreement with Britain and restored diplomacy in some way. I don’t think the allies would have turned down the offer if Germany agreed to help in the war effort against Japan

      @s.thompson9@s.thompson94 жыл бұрын
  • Got a Mafia City ad,will always watch them throufh

    @siva4wotblitzhero531@siva4wotblitzhero5313 жыл бұрын
  • Could you do the next video about the Amerika Bombers and the plan of strategic bombing + Invasion against the US?

    @komradetuniska2003@komradetuniska20037 жыл бұрын
    • know nothing about it, at some point maybe, but it is mostly sensationalism, not my cup of tea, reality is exciting enough.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • It's worth a look in my opinion, if only as an example of how not to run a procurement program. It reflects a lot of what was wrong with the way the Luftwaffe acquired its aircraft. Here's an interesting place to start: www.amazon.com/Luftwaffe-Over-America-Secret-United/dp/1848328427 (A fair bit of reading between the lines is advisable to get the most out of it.) Given the vids you've already done on the German aircraft industry and aircraft development (e.g. the Me262), I would really like to see you attempt this one at some stage.

      @Ensign_Cthulhu@Ensign_Cthulhu7 жыл бұрын
    • Glad you're avoiding sensationalism

      @Delzak1@Delzak17 жыл бұрын
    • Call something on a blueprint "Amerika Bomber" and see how busy the homeguard is whizz around....^^

      @mikeromney4712@mikeromney47127 жыл бұрын
    • +Military History Visualized Yeah, you're right. We'll keep it historical only but it's still an interesting alternate history scenario.

      @komradetuniska2003@komradetuniska20037 жыл бұрын
  • What was the first of HItler's major war decisions you would qualify as irrational?

    @Battleschnodder@Battleschnodder7 жыл бұрын
    • I know, it is a question directed at M.H.V., but in case he doesn't answer, I'll throw in my 2 cents: The most important and probably decisive irrational mistake Hitler made, with other words, the mistake that probably lost him the war, was when he interrupted the Battle for Britain to start "The Blitz". The Royal Airforce was actually almost defeated by the German air attacks. The airfields were bombed out, the radar stations were largely destroyed and the pilots were exhausted. You can see in letters they wrote that they were demoralized and expected the UK to surrender every day. Then there was that first successful bombing raid against Berlin and Hitler went apeshit. He ordered the Luftwaffe to stop attacking military targets and attack useless civilian targets instead, in retaliation. They even strapped 250 kg bombs to the Bf 109 fighters, further decreasing their range and endurance. That gave the Royal Airforce the time they needed to recover, repair the airfields and radar stations and fight the Luftwaffe back. It is actually mostly British historians who admit that the UK didn't so much "win" the Battle for Britain, as rather "not lose" it and that it was a mistake by Hitler that caused the outcome. If the Germans would have kept attacking military targets, they would pretty much inevitably have won the Battle of Britain and that would have meant keeping air superiority over Europe and the ability to keep American/Canadian supplies away from the Russians. All the other mistakes Hitler made that get talked about so much, like halting the Wehrmacht and allowing the British Expeditionary Force to escape at Dunkerque or the decision to take Stalingrad, are rather insignificant in comparison. The current crop of historians doesn't like to admit that Germany ever had any chance to win the war, so they don't talk about that one giant mistake Hitler made that probably decided the war.

      @TrangleC@TrangleC7 жыл бұрын
    • TrangleC Thank you for your opinion on that question, I didn't even think to locate it that early. You make a convincing argument

      @Battleschnodder@Battleschnodder7 жыл бұрын
    • Battle of Britain. Taking Crete instead of Malta. And operation Barbarossa.

      @nattygsbord@nattygsbord7 жыл бұрын
    • Die Halte Befehl

      @marsnz1002@marsnz10027 жыл бұрын
    • well, probably the one that was most unreasonable was the halt order at Dunkirk: kzhead.info/sun/hJ1uj8Ofj3xvn2g/bejne.html But it depends if it was solely intended to show the High Command who is in charge then one could argue it wasn't so irrational at all. The thing is most "irrational" behavior can make quite a lot of sense if one knows all the circumstances of the person, but also doesn't know other stuff. So, probably the standfast order in Winter 1941 was the most irrational, because he assumed that the soldiers would stop "running". But I never gave it a thought.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
  • What Hitler apparently failed to appreciate was that FDR would have had a hard time getting Congress to support a declaration of war against Germany without Hitler declaring war on America first. The American public was ready for a war against Japan even before December 7, 1941. A declaration against Germany was another matter. Hitler's declaration was an enormous political gift to FDR. Also Hitler was quite an undemanding ally. His declaration assured that the bulk of America's resources would be devoted to defeating him rather than Japan. Japan, on the other hand, made sure to stay in the good graces of Stalin and enabled him to transfer over 18 divisions, 1,700 tanks, and over 1,500 aircraft from Siberia and the Far East. These were the forces used in the very successful counter offensive referred to in the clip. No matter how you look at it, Hitler's declaration of war against the US was an enormous blunder.

    @billboth4814@billboth48145 жыл бұрын
  • Well reasoned video

    @llamov@llamov4 жыл бұрын
  • Rose-ah-velt not rooz-eh-velt

    @CreativeZachGaminglebestvids@CreativeZachGaminglebestvids5 жыл бұрын
    • Neither are correct if you're Dutch.

      @crose7412@crose74124 жыл бұрын
  • If Germany had denounced Japan and offered to help the United States against Japan, it would've been almost impossible for the United States to declare war on Germany for at least a year and possibly longer. There were already many people in America that didn't think we should get involved in the war in Europe anyway. It was a blunder by Hitler to declare war and I think it was mostly an emotional reaction.

    @EtzEchad@EtzEchad5 жыл бұрын
  • Can you make please english subtitle? I love your videos, but sometimes I can't understand the words. (English is not my native, and I'm 16, so I don't have much experience in language).

    @domestoscraft@domestoscraft7 жыл бұрын
    • sorry, I can't spend the time to do subtitles, although I review community submitted subtitles as soon as I spot them.

      @MilitaryHistoryVisualized@MilitaryHistoryVisualized7 жыл бұрын
    • I can understand. Thank you for your reply.

      @domestoscraft@domestoscraft7 жыл бұрын
  • I also heard that due to the Soviet Winter offensive in late 1941 and uncertainty regarding Jaanese intentions in Siberia, he wanted to guarantee Japanese entry into the war against Russia. (As negotiations with Washington broke down, there was a debate between the army who favoured a "northern" strategy against Russia in Siberia like in 1918 and the navy who favoured a "southern" strategy in the East Indies and Pacific against the so called ABCD powers.) So he wanted to pressure the Japanese into declaring war on the Soviet union sensing that the Japanese might turn southwards away from the Soviet Union, and "in return" declared war on the USA. Hitler also had ideological as well as strategic reasons for getting the Japanese in the war against Russia instead of moving southwards--he feared that the destruction of the Euro-American colonial possessions in the Pacific would deal a great blow to white supremacy. Ironically, both Churchill and Hitler mourned the fall of Singapore to the Japanese (he forbade any German officials from celebrating it).

    @ericthegreat7805@ericthegreat78054 жыл бұрын
  • He wasn’t stupid. Crazy, yes. Evil, yes. But he was very smart.

    @thejamesperson2822@thejamesperson28225 жыл бұрын
    • my dictator is more powerful than your dictator

      @Hopesedge@Hopesedge4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Contagious93812 Stalin purged his army, tried invading Finland, caused the holdomor that's somehow smarter

      @Wickedonezz@Wickedonezz4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Contagious93812 and lost how many? You know America would've got it but they held back

      @Wickedonezz@Wickedonezz4 жыл бұрын
    • @@Contagious93812 what? I think your grammar is wrong but America still would've gotten Japan even Germany without the Soviets you know the Chinese were still a thing right

      @Wickedonezz@Wickedonezz4 жыл бұрын
  • I say its better he held his fire. Longer America was not on him the better. U can say 1942 at earliest Franklynn declared war on him would benefit Germany as more time.

    @TheKeithvidz@TheKeithvidz7 жыл бұрын
  • I've always thought it more likely that he declared war on the US in order to encourage the Japanese to declare war on the Soviet Union. My understanding is that Stalin maintain troops in the far east in order to counter a potential Japanese invasion and it was only when he learned that no such invasion would take place that he was able to move the troops westward, in time to win the Battle of Moscow. Had the Japanese acted differently, Hitler would have taken Moscow and possibly won the war in the east.

    @ChefEarthenware@ChefEarthenware7 жыл бұрын
    • Hitler though he had Japan's support if he went into the Soviet Union. Germany and Japan had an agreement that if one of their nations was attacked the other would declare war. Unfortunately It didn't say anything about declaring war on a nation you attacked. Not to mention the fact that the Japanese and Soviet Union had a treaty which Japan was not about to violate since they were getting their butts kicked by the Soviets earlier.

      @richardkmetz8928@richardkmetz89287 жыл бұрын
  • The more interesting question is why the Finlandized states of Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania for no particular reason declared war as well (roughly at the same time), and it took the US some 6 months to reciprocate. History sometimes tends to be dispassionate in its analysis, judging something but its logic in hindsight. I think it is hard to make sense of a lot of the 30s without acknowledging the pathos of the time.

    @juankenon@juankenon6 жыл бұрын
  • holy jesus fuck me how did you get 135k subs? last time i checked you had like 5k

    @thepigmaster8193@thepigmaster81937 жыл бұрын
    • Because he's a good unbiased visualiser of history (see what I did there :P)

      @darthcalanil5333@darthcalanil53337 жыл бұрын
  • "Now the general who wins a battle makes many calculations in his temple ere the battle is fought. The general who loses a battle makes but few calculations beforehand. Thus do many calculations lead to victory, and few calculations to defeat: how much more no calculation at all! It is by attention to this point that I can foresee who is likely to win or lose." - Sun Tzu's _The Art of War_ The little man made a plan that was inflexible to the US entering the war earlier than 1942. This caused him to lose opportunities and was forced to reevaluate and react, losing any control he might have had of the war. In chess parlance, he was white, and had the advantage. But then he screwed up and lost his momentum to black, and eventually the game. *Then he ragequit.* 😹

    @mousermind@mousermind4 жыл бұрын
  • Japan used diplomacy and negotiations to lay American guards down, they already had the Philippines invasion plans layed out and approved, what was needed were concessions yet Yamamoto insisted on attacking Pearl Harbor if the U.S didn't give up the Pacific, which it clearly wouldn't.

    @advisorynotice@advisorynotice Жыл бұрын
  • Hitler gained very little from his alliance with Japan. He would have been better advised to continue the Weimar Germany policy of backing nationalist China. Hitler wanted Japan because he mistakenly believed that Japan would be an ally in a war on the USSR.

    @tancreddehauteville764@tancreddehauteville7642 жыл бұрын
  • No, there was no way of knowing if the U.S. would declare war on Germany. Many in the U.S. (including my father who joined the navy after Dec 7th) He thought most of our effort should be against Japan, who had directly attacked us for really no reason. But Hitler made the great mistake of taking the U.S. on. Yes Germany might have been able to keep the U.S. from declaring war. Hitler made the great blunder, and yes he did have a choice.

    @zoila605@zoila6054 жыл бұрын
    • "Great mistake" Germany had already lost the war, usa only sped it up. Usa only really did an actual impact by supplying the allies, which they already did before they were at war with Germany.

      @Reijvi@Reijvi4 жыл бұрын
    • @James Henderson Yes there was an embargo by the U.S. But the reason for this is that Japan had invaded Korea and raped that nation. Then Japan went into China and did the same. Not to mention that Japan was not honoring the the agreement with the U.S. to scrap navel ships. The U.S. did scrap theirs but Japan lied and did not. So what oh great wise blame the U.S. for NO REASON Jim should the U.S. had done? Do business with Japan selling them oil and vital metals and turn a blind eye to what Japan was doing? You would be even madder if the U.S. continued to supply Japan thus aiding them to rape the rest of Asia. And my mother lived through the hell of occupied Philippines by the Japanese. And when I say rape I mean rape.

      @zoila605@zoila6054 жыл бұрын
    • Japan did not attack for no reason. It may have been a foolish plan in hindsight but they had many reasons for attacking Pearl Harbor and other US naval bases in the South Pacific. Mostly it was about oil and other resources that it needed to extend it's Empire. Their goal was not to defeat the US but to force the US into a negotiation. The US most certainly would have declared war on Germany as they were allies with Japan and the Nazis were attacking US ships in the Atlantic.

      @shrimpflea@shrimpflea Жыл бұрын
  • No one escapes PURE FREEDOM MERICA

    @tiscotisa9731@tiscotisa97317 жыл бұрын
    • LIBERTY BOMBERS DROPPING LIBERTY! Hence the name! ...and democracy.

      @napornik@napornik7 жыл бұрын
    • The OutdoorGamer especially Americans. They don’t even know what freedom is

      @conors4430@conors44305 жыл бұрын
  • Good vid; thx

    @elliota.1063@elliota.10636 жыл бұрын
  • While Hitler did have some grasp on the potential power of the US he still underestimated it, as shown when he scoffed at his underlings' estimations of the US' industrial production capabilities (as it turns out even they had underestimated the industrial might of the US).

    @Kagemusha08@Kagemusha083 жыл бұрын
KZhead