Martin Scorsese gets honored with the Cecil B. DeMille Award at the 2010 Golden Globes - Part 2
2010 ж. 17 Қаң.
72 051 Рет қаралды
Check out this cool Martin Scorsese collection: amzn.to/1txoBLL
Check out this cool Martin Scorsese collection: amzn.to/1txoBLL
I love the part of Scorsese's speech when he says that seeing a De Mille picture was an event for him because for me seeing a Scorsese film is an event.
He mentioned Satyajit Ray. Rare.
The best living director for sure! Even his worst movies are amazing.
the de niro speech about the tapes when he´s presenting scorsese is already a classic!!!!
Wow, what a speech!
0:32 'Man my husband sucks'
it must be a great honor to be directed by Martin Scorsese.
I love Martin scorsese he is just a brilliant director!!!
And what is your fave film of his?
Great guy! my faves of his are Goodfellas, Taxi Driver, Casino After Hours, Wolf of Wall Street are my faves of his
Marty mentioned the Cinema of Senegal films. Very impressive.
The crowd lissens with a gazed look on their face before the few Italian masters left in hollywood, must i say reminds me of a church crowd listening to their pastor..
LOL Ive noticed Scorsese never says ¨MOVIES¨, he always says ¨PICTURES¨! Keeping it Old school lol.. My favorite director all time..
lol QT's nod at 2:03.....what a cool guy
I love how the camera cuts to George Lucas as Martin Scorsese is talking about the importance of preserving films
Yup and in 1988 they made a speech about preserving films and made that film preservation thing of AFI
And Tarantino earlier, you just know Quentin was giddy right there when he started reeling off those titles
@84g8 Are we forgetting Al Pacino Eastwood and Nicholson here? (although distantly relevant genre)
2:03 tarantino is like " i wanna be like him some day!"
Well Pulp Fiction and Reservoir Dogs are Scorceses like
@Gaston088able That's an OLD film storytelling motto. Now, with Cameron's help, you can actually make a perfect film without dialogue. Not a silent film, per-say. But, Cameron has certain laid the track for perfect visual storytelling. On par with Kane, IMO.
@84g8 Yeah I went overboard with the off screen bit. Although ever since that film Di Caprio has come on leaps and bounds. I think Day Lewis was better by a fair margin but ever since Leo has been superb. Although There Will Be Blood has some of the most understated, real acting I've ever seen from Day Lewis. Its a shame everyone just remembers those scenes he dominates. Paul Dano is outrageously good as well. He could be a genuine great on the basis of that film alone should he get the roles.
Kate WInslet! 2:20! oh and this made me think how much of a legend leo is going to be by the time he's de niro's age!!
No, Scorsese is the king
@84g8 o wow, my favorites the departed also, but i think his best film is raging bull (with taxi driver being a VERY close second)
Never been a fan of Raging Bull but for me Goodfellas is his best
Eastwood too. :)
@84g8 spot on.
@malows1234 Um, Leo worked with Scorsese and Cameron - in a movie and a role that will be as legendary as any De Niro film, I bet anything.
Because you don't understand how Cameron's shots work, does NOT MEAN that they're hollow in any way. And making a film, where the plot is the most crucial thing, is pretty one-dimensional. BUT, if the plot is a byproduct of great character story, motivation, etc, you get a James Cameron film. And, given the finished products like Aliens and T2, I'd say that will make for a GREAT FUTURE in film.
3:47 James cameron table :D
@84g8 i cant say how much i agree. what's your favorite scorsese picture?
You meant Francis Ford Coppola.
After doing my own storyboards, based off everything I've learned, simply by watching Cameron's work, there's no goddamn way I'm going to change my mind about his genius. And, it's too goddamn bad for you, if you don't like hearing me defend him, against inexperienced, juvenile comments. What the hell do you mean, Cameron masks his actor with his writing? He's actually creating characters so well, visually, with every shot, you just think Cameron's writing is poor.
@LukeLovesRose THE BASE OF A TRULLY GREAT FILM IS THE SCREENPLAY,...LIKE BILLY WILDER SAID : "YOU CANT MAKE CHOCOLATE FROM EXCREMENT OF CHICKEN ".....YOU GET IT???...CAMERON HIMSELF ADMITS HE IS A REGULAR WRITER....
the EFFIN AUDIO IS OFF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Goodfellas DOES come to mind as the greatest show on Earth.
@84g8 Agree with everything but Day-Lewis and Chaplin are the best actors of all time. You would hear more about them if they had American passports. Scorsese is the best though!!
should have been deniro and pesci that presented the award with all due respect to dicaprio
@BullshiterBader Tarantino toooo!!
I noticed that too. We are maybe wrong, but it looks like Cameron are thinking like ''I'm listening Scorsese only because I have to, his time has passed and I'm a way better director than him''.
Quintin is a downright hollywood fanboy
@guez999 good point but scorsese greatest movies starred deniro and pesci eg Raging Bull and Goodfellas , even though Gangs ,Aviator and Departed are all solid movies they are no way near the movies scorses did with pesci and deniro
@merlin999999 isnt he alreaady???
You know what pisses me off about Scorsese and Cameron is the way Marty here said that "We need technical directors like James Cameron." As a film lover or genius himself, Scorsese can't see the artistry in the way Cameron conveys characters. Marty is treating JC as nothing more than another Bay or DeMille or any other filmmakers that supposedly cares more about effects than character and story. BUT, Cameron did bring the Terminator to life and aside from a few shots, he was not an effect.
@razbigranicu DeMille really was never as great as Marty let-on. He may have made big event movies, but they always had one defining characteristic. They never really submerged the viewers into their world as well as most of the true masters have done so well over the years. Yes, he helped found film, but he wasn't a master of the moving image like Scorsese, Cameron, Kubrick, Hitchcock, etc. These directors know exactly where and how to keep the audiences attentions, no matter what happens.
You still haven't answered my question. What kind of movie did Travis Bickle take Betsy to in Taxi Driver? It's really not hard, if you've actually seen the film.
@84g8 Nah I'd disagree with you there! (again!) The Departed isn't as good as the original japanese/chinese film (can't remember now). I also happen to think that Scorsese best picture and Leo's best performance was in Shutter Island although I understand thats not everyones taste!! leo is superb in that. Its a crime if he doesn't take home the best actor award for SI. Or if his (similar don't you think, the wife kids etc) inception performance is considered more worthy.
@LukeLovesRose DOTN MAKE ME LAUGHT!....YOU ARE "ONE OF THE CHOSEN ONES" WHO CAN SEE THE ARTISTIC MASTERPIECES OF JAMES CAMERON????......JAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAJAAJAJAJAJAAJAJAJAJAJAJA!....I ALMOUST DIED LAUGHTING!.....WHAT IS A MASTER PICE FOR YOU?...WHAT CAMERON FILM HAS GREAT NARRATIVE, GREAT PERFORMANCES, REAL HONEST DRAMA???? (NOT THE CLISHE LOVE STORY FOR TEENAGERS OF TITANIC AND AVATAR)....I ALWAYS ENJOY WATCHING CAMERON FILM FOR THE SPECTACLE THEY ARE!...BUT NOTHING MORE! LUKE ROSE...GROW UP!!!!
@84g8 No way. Day Lewis has never done an average performance. Not all of his performances have been about intensity either, some of his best work are his understated performances. I've watched all Di Caprio films apart from Blood Diamond and all Day lewis. Day Lewis is superior although he has been around a great deal longer and with every role Leo improves. No Day Lewis has diversity vs Di Caprio. He is quite far ahead in that department although Leo will definetly be an all time great.
Unlike people with such limited vision, like you, Gaston, I've actually experimented with Cameron genius techniques on my own... and I've gotta say.... What James Cameron can do visually is so much harder than writing some "revolutionary" screenplay. Btw, writing such an awesome screenplay... that transcends all others before it... is impossible... after the gargantuan amount of screenplays produced in Hollywood in the last 100 years. So, maybe you should cut JC some slack.
@razorraymarv KING OF AMERICAN CINEMA? how about SPIELBERG, COPOLLA, CAMERON
@mrkottinmouth That's unfair. We obviously have no idea what Cameron was thinking in that shot. However, Cameron's work has been phenomenal for almost 30 years. His films are aging like wine. And, I think anyone would be a fool not to count James Cameron among the true masters of film. But, I've recently noticed that there are a lot of fools in Hollywood today. Like everyone felt after 2001, filmmakers better learn to adapt to James Cameron's definitive style or get out.
@ I have watched every single DDL performance. Selfish? That is crazy! He doesn't write or direct so dominating screen time etc by his own hand is an absurd accusation. Also watch other performances like Gangs of NY where he acts Leo of screen despite being on for less time. Saying hes selfish is like complaining when Messi runs from one end of the field to the other and scores a wonder goal 'why didn't he pass it?'' Good point about Keaton but he never made a film IMO as good as City Lights.
@Ichir Might compare? The American media seem to believe to be a great actor you have to have an American passport. Day Lewis has already had a much more diverse set of roles than Brando, Pacino and De Niro. He also hasn't done any terrible films or ever seeked to just cash in on his fame like De Niro in Meet The Fuckers etc. He also hasn't done a bad or average performance which you certainly couldn't say for the above 3. No, Day Lewis is in a class of 1 to anyone that has seen ALL his films.
But dont write him back....just read the comments!
Gaston088able, I can't believe you're still trying to fight me on this. I have an opinion and I'm sticking by it. You may not agree with my opinion. But, that doesn't mean my opinion is bad. I just happen to look at film a little differently than you. That's not a bad thing. That just means that we're both unique individuals... with different perspectives. Btw, I think we should go back in time and tell Shakespeare not to write that teen romance of his. It's too cliche and melodramatic right?
Now, if you want art for the sake of art, watch Barry Lyndon and 2001. They are both perfectly made for that reason. But, I want more than that. I want ART AND entertainment. I want movies like A Clockwork Orange and Dr. Strangelove. I want The Terminator, Aliens, The Abyss, Terminator 2, True Lies, and especially Titanic. I also want Avatar. These are all art AND entertainment films. Michael Bay does not make art. He makes explosions look cool. And that's all he's capable of.
The future of film? If that is the case, then we are in big trouble....If Scorsese's is "old news" and Cameron speaks for the future of films...then you are basically saying that the idea of good storytelling is outdated...and the future is all about hollow visuals.......can't wait for the future!
Typical, Kay. What makes you really Scorsese knows more about what film can do than Cameron? Cameron was able to make an Austrian bodybuilder, who could barely act before, into a living legend, with his first film.
goodfeller
His masterpiece with Taxi Driver and more
@84g8 Don't make me laugh...
WHAT ELSE ONE CAN SAY TO A GUY WHO SAYS : "WHAT CAMERONS DO TECHNOLOGICAL IS MUCH MORE IMPORTANT TO ANY REVOLUTIONARY SCRIPT",...OR THAT CAMERON IS THE MODERN KUBRICK AND HITCHCCOCK . Clearly for you 3-d visuals in cameron films are more important than his 2d-characters and RECYCLE/COPY STORYLINE!!!!!!!!!!... "GREAT FILMAKING".... How, tellme please how can you defend yourself after those lines???.
Wow...all of those people are great, but 10 pluses?! Martin doesn't touch Orson Welles. DeNiro and DiCaprio? Do you watch any movies before 1980? Get real people.
@MrPrincebinondo Spielberg and Cameron??? Is that supposed to be a joke??? They aren't even close to being worthy of such a title..
You misunderstood everything in Cameron's films. So, I'm not going to bother responding to your childish banter.
when you put cameron to the level of great filmaking from legends like kubrick and hitchcoock ,by definition you are saying that the great cinema and filmaking is that: explotions and pyrotechnics = cameron films are about and nothing more....what you find in cameron movies besides of the visual spectacle???, what meaning, deep, narration skills, ideas, stories you find great on those films???'....thats why is so stupid that you keep saying that cameron is the mdoern kubrick or hitchcoock!
@LukeLovesRose luke rose, damn! you will never learn! read my other comments( the first part of this page, i wrote for you)....remember me?...you still think Cameron does "several masterpieces"...my god.... he is just a Visual technical freak in the good way" but nothing more, MArty is more about Characters developemnt and actors directors, besides he nows also direct big movies like GANGS OF NEW YORK or THE AVIATOR, and MArty has said he admire the thecnical talent of CAmeron! that is wrong?
@MrPrincebinondo believe me they are nowhere near martin scorsese when it comes to filmmaking.....
Hi kay....why you waste time arguing with the joker of LUKELOVESROSE...i do it because i can humialliate him very easy....look what i also wrote him in this page here on youtube "Steven Spielberg winning an Oscar® for "Saving Private Ryan" "...... And tellme if im wrong in what i wrote to him!....
Lynch, Von Trier, Scorsese and Polanski art is so much on the surface and obvious that I picked it all up like 10 years ago. My suspicions were confirmed when certain filmmakers started telling us all their intentions for the films in the audio commentary. Cameron lies about his intentions for each film. You know why? Because he can. Because there are only a chosen few of us who can see his films for the artistic masterpieces that they are. Your childish crap confirms that.
Yes. I'm saying that you need help. Give it up. I'm not reading anything more from you.
martin looks so old but he sounds like a 30 year old, LOLL
He sure does for a guy born in 1942
JAJAJAJAJ....I ALMOUST FALL OF MY CHAIR WHEN I READ YOUR PATETIC SORRY ANSWER TRYING TO DEFEND CAMERON!!!....why you keep defending the impossible man??? One thing is that some film use an element of something that was done before....but the entire storyline????...that is your idea of GREAT FILMAKING???....AVATAR...THE ABYSS....ENTIRE PLOTS COPIED FROM OTHER FILMS....HOW CAN YOU DEFEND THAT???
@iloveneytiri DDL is one of the most overrated actors of all time. He's very talented, but he is such a selfish actor that I could never consider him one of the 10 best ever. Hell, he's not even in my top 5 for his contemporaries. Chaplin is the most important actor of the silent film era, though you could make the argument for Keaton being better.
@LukeLovesRose Cameron definityve style?...i laught readind the stupid things you wrote, what Cameron does is only make storys base on clishes like titanic(the clishe love story just like rome and juliet in a ship) and avatar(dances with wolves, the last samurai,etc) In space. Cameron does storys and character in 2-d!! WAKE UP! How old are you? GROW UP, and FAST! please! Watch Lynch, von trier, Scorsese, polanski works and The Cameron films looks like child play!
What is your need in comment your CAMERON LOVE, TRYING to make the point he is the "best" in the pages of other filmakers like scott, here(scorsese)???....your objetive is that we all thing like you? sorry, most of the people knows what cameron trully does and what GREAT FILMAKING is about....look how many diferent people are making the point to you in diferent pages...why you keep proving your ignorance and give the reason to them, me, ceratoide??? what drives you? your ignorance? or arrogance?
CAMERON MOVIES ARE ABOUT 1 OR 2 "MAJOR STORIES" over and over and over....IS DIFERENT TO SAY THAT FILMAKING IN GENERAL IS ABOUT "7 MAJOR STORIES" IDIOTIC! They are so diferent stories like films made every year....they have similaritys in some things,beucase they are about universal trues about human nature, but you IGNORANT "CONFUSE" to "8 major stories" resuming filmaking to that because you try to make the point that is OK that cameron copied other stories, not SOME, THE COMPLETE STORYLINE!
You guys are getting seriously psychotic in your hatred for certain Cameron films. I'm seriously going to ignore you from now on.
Cameron has not made a good movie since True Lies
Is this really how pathetic you have become? All of a sudden, being responsible for an actor's stardom makes you a genius? One of many things that keep Scorsese and Cameron apart, is that Cameron masks his actor with his writing. It's not about the actors, it's all about his weak writing. For Scorsese, it's about an actor contributing to another dimension to the story. If you got Arnold with Cameron, you got the best out of DeNiro through Scorsese....you should really stop with this nonsense.
Eastwood was good. Until old age hit him. Hereafter was TERRIBLY dull if you ask me.