GeForce RTX 4060 | Ray Tracing Performance vs RTX 3060, RTX 2060, and GTX 1060
The GeForce RTX 4060 is available now! Experience performance multiplying DLSS 3, the ultra-efficient NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, immersive ray tracing, and the RTX platform of technologies to supercharge your gaming and creating.
Footage capture: 1920x1080 Resolution, Highest Game Settings, DLSS Super Resolution Quality Mode on RTX 20 Series, 30 Series, and 40 Series; Frame Generation on RTX 40 Series, i9-12900K, 32GB RAM, Win 11 X64. RTX 3060 12GB model.
Learn More: www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/...
Subscribe to GeForce! / @nvidiageforce
GeForce Twitter: / nvidiageforce
GeForce Instagram: / nvidiageforce
GeForce TikTok: / nvidiageforce
GeForce Facebook: / nvidiageforce
GeForce Community Portal: www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/...
#BeyondFast
#RTXOn
showing 2060 and 3060 with DLSS off and 4060 with DLSS on + frame generation on; fair comparison!
I really don't understand this comparison either. It's not directly an apple to apple comparison... If all games could use framegen then they would have an argument, but its way too few games for now to even be a selling point. Nvidia just really lost touch with reality.
Wait what? I actually thought NVIDIA cheated only by enabling frame gen on the 4060! If they disabled DLSS on the 3060 and 2060, that's straight on a lie
read the description it compare with 2060 , 3060 dlss on
@aboassaad4759 the 2060 and 3060 don't have Frame Generation, which is the major selling point of the 40 Series Cards. It's using ai to generate fake frames, and to make games look like they run better than they actually do. It's only on 40 series cards. DLSS 2 is on the 20 and 30 series cards, not DLSS 3 amd frame generation.
@@KaranBenchmarks kzhead.info/sun/hcOwlrmMo5hrgas/bejne.html
Card is a joke without DLSS3.
Watch it become more of a joke when amd releases FG for everyone, which they've been planning for months
Fsr for all open source.
No it isn't. For anybody with a 2060 or lower the 4060 is a godsend. DLSS3 is just icing on the cake.
@@Wobbothe3rd a "godsend"? With only 8GB of VRAM?
@@Wobbothe3rd Lmao a godsend, really? Have you seen the specs of the 4060?
Fake interpolated frames don't count as frames, you can't benchmark them as if they're real frames, they don't improve responsiveness whatsoever. It's like old TV makers falsely advertising 60Hz TVs as 120Hz or 240Hz based on interpolation.
Fake it till you make it!
Saying 4060 with DLSS3 is faster is like saying your car is faster because you took the doors off and the seats out.
GPU go vrrrrrruummm
But it's faster andd looks good so no?
No
@@leeperkillz5397the 3060 ti gives better performance or the same for a better price
@@ek94gamer403060ti is a lot expensive than 4060 in my country
Lmao nvidia stop being greedy
What this man said
lol they're a company that's literally their job
Frame Generation is so amazing! It’s in 12 whole games out of tens of thousands! Wow! We don’t even need good performance anymore! We can just play DLSS3 games only and pretend it’s okay! Nvidia is the best!
Idiots like ypu said the same thing about DLSS itself back in 2018. Look at things today...
Insert their IA generated song at computex "I really like NVIDIA" in the background....
@@jonylentz oh no. Please don’t remind me of that again lol. I almost died of cringe when I saw it on GN’s video.
🤣 красавчик😉
@@Sydney_2011link to video please? 😅😅
I’d be excited if I lived under a rock. Unfortunately I’m well aware this gen is not for gamers.
You're in an active Nvidia echo chamber bubble of biased bullshit. In the real world 90% of gamers choose Nvidia for a reason.
It's not for gamers it's for framers, ppl is all about frames
@@wessun5487Gonna use the term "framers" now, thank you
@@wessun5487 Thanks for the new word. Framers, I'll use it too from now on
for those who did not see the description they say that the comparison is in 1080P, DLSS in quality mode (without DLSS in the GTX series, in RTX 40 with frame generation), the system is I9 12900K, 32GB of ram, Windows 11 64Bits
So 1060 can run DLSS? figures....
@@winni2701 No, GTX series do not support DLSS, but can benefit from AMD's FSR
@@winni2701 he obviously said a 1060 cant run dlss are you drunk?
@@7xyn comment got edited, are you blind? don't do methanole
@@winni2701 how am i supposed to know what he said before he edited?
I'm a big fan of software augmentation to improve framerates and such, but I miss the days where we would see old gen (no dlss) + new gen (no dlss) + new gen (with dlss). Not all games support DLSS, let alone DLSS3 with frame-gen, so it seems deceptive to cherry-pick a handful of games that do. Makes it feel like you know you have something to hide when you're not giving the full picture (which, as many have already pointed out, seems to be the case)
Reviewer: this card is so good at being bad Nvidia:"this card is so good"
As amazing as DLSS is, I don’t want it to be a technology that’s used as an excuse by developers to not optimise their games. Also, it shouldn’t even be solely focused on for “extra frames”
You could literally say that about every graphics card technology ever. Should we go back to software rendering since GPUs are themselves a "crutch"!? Stupid complaint. STOP WHINING.
Yes this new RTX 4040 is looking good vs the GTX 1060.
Don't insult the 1060. It was a great value in it's day and age.
@@zodwraith5745um what?
The 1060 is rendering at a higher resolution
@@zodwraith5745 It still is.
@@scarlet7960s a man who ran a 1060 for 5 years until 3 days ago, i can say it is great.
we don't need fps tests from you guys there are channels like LTT on youtube who truly test and review these cards Why don't you turn off frame generation and show us the comparisons instead
Lol those channels are AMD biased liars.
don't care fake frames, show us the real frames comparison!! dlss at 1080p is a joke I think you guys knew that!!
comparing it with 1060/2060s that are not using DLSSS is super cringe. FAKE FRAMES
Breaking news, nvidia's bs and shady marketing strikes again!
My first ever card was the 2060 Super. I loved it. I upgraded to the 3060Ti the next year and got a massive performance upgrade. If I upgrade this year though? I’d just be wasting money for almost no uplift. DLSS3 only helps in the 0.001% of games that support it. My entire steam library only has 1 game that supports it. It’s a slap in the face to consumers. I will not upgrade this year, but when I finally do, it will be an AMD card.
А моей первой видеокартой была видеокарта Radeon с памятью 128 Mb, даже не помню как она называлась, GTA Vice-City ее убила от перегревов🤫🤭 Это был 2003 год.😅
yeah i did the same got my rx 6600 . but u can wait for 2 generations to get an impreesive upgrade and stick with amd cause nividia don't care nymore about gamers they r into ai much more now
@@russlanruslanovich Во ты мажор =) 128мб . Моя первая GeForce2 MX400 32Mb
@@pushthetempo3229у ребят есть графические карты?
@@elitesooraj 3060 ti
If fsr 3 ever become a thing, what will NVIDIA do for advising
DLSS wipes the floor with FSR 😂😂😂 no competition whatsoever.
@@RoyARJ007dlss 2 looks a little softer compared to fsr 2 they run bassicly the same and fsr 3 is planned to use frame gen, but even so it's a free upgrade for everyone
@@RoyARJ007like I said it's good for everyone to has options and those previous generation cards get a nice boost
@@0opsyt I guess FSR 3 Frame Gen only exclusive for AMD GPUs.
@@Jakiyyyyy 😂😂😂😂 In your dreams, that cheap ass tech will be available for everyone.
price for 4060 is too high, and it also does not work well in 2k resolution, having significant frame rate drops due to lack of memory. I always bought only nvidia, but this time I thought about switching to amd
Buying this instead of the 6700 XT is a travesty, honestly.
Cope and shill. This card is a way better value than a 6700. And for the fucking record $300 is cheaper than the AMD MSRP for the 6700, liars.
memory is not even the main issue
You wanna play in 2K? Buy a 4070
At same price rx 6700 xt can do 4k
Lmao Nvidia taking big Ls with the 4060 that they had to do this unfair comparison which is also bringing them more Ls
Do these guys even watch their own product reviews?
Giving high fps at low power is best for gpu life , most cards generate heat bcoz of high power usage. If they display the temperature of gpu it would be excellent to know this card capabilities.
its a good card tbh not bad
That's the only thing I looked at.
As someone living in Germany, the power-efficiency of my system is a significant consideration!
Lol Just use integrated graphics, for a steady 5 FPS if electricity is so expensive.
@@gruiadevil Currently it costs about €130-150 per year to run my PC, though I do avoid the heating costs in the winter thanks to it! 🤣
@@gruiadevil agree :D
Dann Kauf halt ne gute Karte (z.B ne 6700xt oder so) und undervolte das Ding?
What? The PC consumes pennies. I pay 2 dollars for my computer in Russia
to be sure that the 4060 beats the 1060, always use dlss 3 and frame gen! (lol)
What about comparing raw performance, ngreedia?
Frame Generation won't help when base FPS is not good. You'd just get artifacts. At 1080p you need DLSS to bump up the framerate with RT just so you could get higher FPS allowing you to turn on FG in tandem. The result is a messy, blurry image. I don't know anyone who would play like this... It makes sense at 4k and 1440p, but 1080p is a disaster for DLSS and FG You might as well turn everything off and play native. I've been buying Nvidia for some time now and I was really hoping the 4060 could be something more. Time to switch folks!
Coping harder every generation, I see
Oh wow! I'm so impressed that the card from 2023 significantly outperforms the one from 2016!
4050 turned into 4060
All these 40xx framerates are of course using frame generation etc so its not a fair comparison
What's the matter with raw performance? Misleading test by Nvidia cause all the games have DLSS3 enabled, this card sucks.
Some of the clips make the raw performance seem nearly as good as the double faked ass preformance like the one at 0:56
its awesome how they put the live power draw of the GPU when in order to get those frames you have to be drawing +300W from a 12900k at 90°C lol
DLSS doesnt care about CPU performance
There is a typo for this launch this is a RTX 4050 right?
I don't buy 8 GB VRAM card in 2023 sorry.
That should be the mantra for GPU buying from now on.
@@wingman-1977Yeah the mantra for AMD fanboys.
@@RoyARJ007 you are the type of guy who buys every iphone
@@bhorin8874Come on peeps. There’s no need to start the fangirl wars. Let’s focus on telling Nvidia that this product is not fair.
@@RoyARJ007 That is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard.
Poor Nvidia. As soon as ARC is good you'll be long forgotten. How's the sales of the 4060 8gb cards going?
What about AMD?
@@vorkzen4767 Yep. AMD as well. Competition is healthy for the consumer and stops companies like this becoming a runaway train.
@@ironmaiden5658 which sucks 'cause AMD and Nvidia seem to be price fixing
@@ofon2000 Yeah they certainly are. It makes it difficult to upgrade if we wanted to. . It's actually interesting to come back and revisit this comment. ARC has come a long way in 8 months since I made this comment.
I'm happy with my 1060, but thanks Nvidia
What if the game doesn't support dlss? then how's the performance?
LMAO against GTX 1060
you should use the tensor cores to also improve sound sampling as it could bring much higher audio quality
Frame Generation is good if you have a 144hz monitor and want to boost your fps from 100 to 140, but you shouldnt use it to boost your fps from 30 to 45 cause frame generation requires additional vram and usually by the time your fps are that low your vram is full anyway. It is also a bad idea to use frame generation if you have a 60hz monitor and have something like 45 fps and you turn FG on and it boosts the frame rate to 70 fps, you CANNOT use frame generation with vsync on so you will get screen tearing everywhere.
I am not against Nvidia relaying on some AI technologies to upscale or generate frames as long as these technologies would be on bar with native rendering, but they are not. DLSS 2 is perhaps something, but DLSS 3 is a joke. Fake frames and worse inputs. It is kinda stupid and shouldn't really exist. Some people say it is useful for smoother experience which I don't really get it. Smoother means more visual data and less blur, but these are fake visual data + weird artifacts + higher input lag. I don't understand how such a thing is going to be useful other than tricking some fool consumers.
VSYNC being disable does not cause tearing everywhere. VSYNC dramatically reduces FPS in every game that exists. And usually there isn't much tearing with it disabled.
Well, it seems like power efficiency and DLSS 3 are the key selling points this generation.
Or rather, not-selling points.
agreed, I wish raw performance was also given importance
show numbers without dlss frame generation
now do it all of the GPUs without DLSS on.
And if the game doesn't support dlss?
Sério isso ? A NVIDEA está comparando uma RTX 4060 com placas antigas. Compara com uma RTX 3060 ou RTX 3070 da geração anterior.
This is a rtx 4050 but not a 4060. The raw performance and price are ridiculous.
yeah, now show me the performance without DLSS3 and tell me why DLSS3 is exclusive of 4XXX when the architecture is the same than 3XXX?
Not all game use dlss 3, are driver going to push by it self on older games, AMD its gonna add that ability next drivers for olders games.
Honestly if the raw performance was amazing and faster like the 3060 vs thr 2080. The 40 series cards would be a hit. Like imagine 3080 lecel performance with 4060 pricetag and the new features. Like dlss 3 ontop of that. But nah. The 30 series are still a bettee value
For Next Gen We Want RTX 5060 is faster than RTX 4090 without DLSS or Frame-Generations RTX 5070 is beyond the fastest GPU of today
You're asking for a $10,000 GPU. If you want that type of computing power then call them up and bulk order industrial GPUs.
@@Dobertathonit's not about money, it's all about performance and futureproofing, 16K Resolution is a thing today in 2023 & it's the future resolution for modern GPUs
Show input latency as well.
For the price, i love my 4060 I mostly play RDR2 / GTA 5 in 4K ultra/max . Low watts card that can handle any game so far for a low price. I can't complain
AMD is technically beating NVIDIA just because they don't rely on DLSS and others and still perform very well
But the drivers are awful. I’m sitting on one that’s nearly a year old because they can’t get their shit together
Im upgrading from a 1060 3GB to this. Im soo happy
im upgrading to this too
Nvidia trying really hard to off the 1000-series cards.
If anything this shows their still really good, considering you can get decent fps on a modern game for way under 100 bucks
RTX 4060 8 GB is better for rendering 3 d modelling purposes ( sketch up, lumion) ? Or 4060 8 GB vs 3060 12 gb which is good for 3 d rendering....🙂
3060 more cores more vram
mofu just used FrameGen without mentioning it. LMAO 💀
Wouldnt be surprised if they used a 1060 3gb
I am gonna wait for Rtx 5060 ngl.
I demand to compare 1060 vs 4060 not fps but cost... The era of mining is over but the cost remains the same. Thanks Nvidia! thanks Huang! Top PC it's 50% of the video card and 50% the rest.
You showing a raw power 1060/2060/3060 vs AI based 4060 GPU, not fair comparison !
I have a RX 570, should I upgrade to this or a 3060ti?
I upgraded from a GTX 1660 Ti, and honestly, the 4060 ain't that bad. I can run Cyberpunk with RT on with capped to 60 fps with DLSS, and the image doesn't really differ from native when you play on a 1080p screen
I bet the dislike ratio 95% percent on this video
Nvidia's reliance on DLSS will cost them heavily someday
Well it sure aint costing me. $300 for a card that out performs a 1080ti in every aspect is a good deal no matter how much software it's using.
Even in many titles 4060 looses to 3060 .
a 2060 super performs close to the 4060 , its just sad.
Why RTX3060 not open DLSS ? Are you afraid ?
thanks for making my 4060 laptop same as a desktop 4060
Well at least 40 series laptop have that GPU equality unlike 30 series. 😭
That's what they were aiming for. People complained for too long, that their friends with desktops get better FPS. Now it's a tie.
Nvidia W on this
Can we all agree Nvidia constantly pushes technology forward?
Yes but I also agree NVIDIA= greed compagny as fuck.
Not constantly. Not always forward.
The RTX 4060 is a perfect example of how you shouldn't do a generational "improvement", because the predecessor is cheaper, as well as faster in some instances. The predecessor (RTX 3060) has more VRAM, which is necessary nowadays for 1080p ultra. On top of that, path tracing also increases the VRAM usage, so the RTX 5060 needs at least 12GB VRAM, because 8 ain't enough. Frame generation also is terrible, because some games on 1080p ultra are going to have really high input latency, making it really unpleasant to play. Additionally, the RTX 4060 uses a 50 class type of chip, and it gets called as a RTX 4060 (for greedy $299) anyway. NVIDIA also made the excuse, that this card is really energy efficient and how much money is being saved, in which I can say, that this isn't all that relevant, because there's also a good amount of people on this planet that don't pay electricity bills themselves, aside that one graph by NVIDIA shows the electricity cost in Germany as US dollars, which makes no sense whatsoever because we are here in Europe and don't use dollars. The RTX 4060 is overall just an example of incompetence, greed and laziness
1. The frame generation hardly impacts gameplay with a latency cost of 10ms 2. The VRAM claim is fair but honestly baseless, since 8GB is plenty for 1080p gaming, and most games are able to make due with the 8GB. 3. I don't know what bro is yapping about "NVIDIA shows the electricity cost in Germany as US dollars, which makes no sense whatsoever because we are here in Europe and don't use dollars." Like did bro really just run out of things to complain about that man's proceeds to say that they didn't use the correct dollar amount for your country? There's a thing called currency conversion, where you can convert currency into your currency, it's pretty crazy bro.
Is it me, or does the 3060 look better than the 4060? Pay attention to the clip around about 0:55
Frame generation
So this assumes frame interpolation for the RTX 4060? Dishonest comparison...
Uses less power, better frame rates, that's a win.
Now do this again but use FSR3+FG on 3060 and 2060 and compare.
#fake frames dont win games!
Honest question. Why do people care about "fake frames" if they actually looks and feels good in the real world? People call it just "trickery" that cheats the user, but aren't games in general a bunch of those combined together anyways? (I am a 5700xt user btw)
Because it's only available in a very small number of games
Not everyone is playing games that has dlss
@@derilriordan4109 But I have seem Nvidia made it very easy to implement in any game, and there's is a modder who already implemented it in fallout 4, skyrim, jedi survivor, resident evil 4 and the last of us with great results... Most of those games being sponsored by AMD and only supporting FSR natively only.
wait nvidia . i have gtx 460 , do u not wanna compare performance ?? if it helps gtx 460 may mistakenly be read as rtx 4060 by mistake . people might even buy it by mistake .
Fake frames. Greedy company gatekeeping software that could work for older cards just for newer ones so they could sell you basically the same product yet again. Great job. Way to keep customers and restore your already bad image
Nah just put dlss3 and frame gen for 2k and 3k series
This card and most of the RTX 4000 gen cards are pitiful!! What a slap in the face, after the debacle that was the pandemic you would think if they were going to scalp there own cards they would make it we would have a decent performance jump. Instead they are trying to sell **50 tier at **60ti pricing & **60 tier at **70 pricing. Gamers need to band together and push the skip button on this generation!!
4090 IS a monster.
@@vorkzen4767 yes at 2300 Canadian it's a crazy card that's more then the price of most people's system and the only decent card in the line up. 4080 could have been alright but it's to overpriced and could use more VRAM.
my gtx 1060 be screaming and crying
My favorite part of setting up a new game is turning both DLSS & RTX off and watching the frames improve massively. 😂
Why would you turn DLSS off?
@@choonblaze it makes everything blurry in the distance. Plus I've had a few instances where it actually gives me less frames than TAA.
@@GarageRecordings that's what it's designed to do. TAA is for antialiasing lol.
@@choonblaze It's designed to give me less frames and make everything blurry? Yeah, but you use DLSS in place of antialiasing in most settings menus. It just does the job terribly.
@@GarageRecordings no, it's designed to give you more frames by dynamically adjusting rendering, still nothing to do with antialiasing. Sounds like you're doing it wrong, judging by your confusion with what DLSS and antialiasing is
No nvidia, frame generation it's not real framerate. Stop comparing real fps vs generated fps. The rtx 4060 it's a 50 series tier card. Name it rtx 4050
En vrai, moi qui ai une 6500xt. Ça ne me dérange pas de prendre une 4060 juste pour le rtx
now 4060 dlss3 vs 3060 fsr3
So your comparison is 2060 , dlss off and 3060 dlss off and 4060 w dlss on? Really??
all three have dlss on. 4060 also has frame generation on (which the other two cards lack).
We're get a 1000 FPS ON UHD 8K???😅
these comments are why most companies hide their comment section
So i get this vid is all about pushing your 4060. However is dlss 2 turned on on the 2060 and 3060 in this vid? or are you just using dlss3 for the 4060? because thats not a fair comparison now is it.
Description says it’s on DLSS2 Quality and High settings at 1080p, with the 4060 using Frame Generation on top. Not a fair comparison at all. Especially considering there’s millions of games on the market, and only a small handful with DLSS3 compatibility. Nvidia is trying to get away with selling a weaker card being that’s only ahead because of Frame Generation.
I reckon this generation is a flop to sell 50 series
i don't get why people complain so much about this card it has the same power consumption as a 3050, so its a good option for people who don't wanna spend money on a new power supply not to mention if your cpu is the bottleneck, then my uneducated guess is that frame generation wont introduce ANY latency since the cpu is already making as many real frames as it can it just seems like a reasonable upgrade if you have either a bad cpu or a bad psu, and it looks like an very good option if both things apply and if you have a 1080p monitor like 64% of people (according to steam's hardware survey) vram is not that big of a deal.
Bro with how expensive this is, you could upgrade both the PSU and CPU. Do your math
@@scarlet7960 ok let's do some math. let's say you got 300 dollars, you could either buy (with estimations): an rx 580 (170 dollars) a ryzen 5 2600 (50 dollars) a 500 watts psu (60 dollars you can go lower at your own risk) which is a bit unfair since buying used stuff is always gonna be better if you are careful with who you buy from. OR just buy a 4060 and still get more fps with fg (with some old core i5) OR just buy a 6600 and get that same amount of fps with amd's fg when it comes out and i didn't think about that this card might just be waiting to destroy the 4060's appeal entirely lol it's just needs 22 more watts but it could mostly perform the same under these circumstances. not to mention the big difference in price.
@@something5931 yeah guess your right I was kinda an asshole when writing that comment
@@scarlet7960 don't worry about it, thanks to You i came to a different conclusion anyways
At least the 4080 and 4090 are badass? I don't have $1200+ though?
4080 and 4090 cost beyond $1200 those cards still expensive for the market
@@Ghostlynotme445 not sure what market you're in but in the US they're at MSRP. I've even seen the 4080 at $1100.
@@84jdgregorysome models go $1100 other more even to the 4090 price and still never come down yet well amd 24gb gpu I see them coming down $899-830
They trying so hard to find a way to make this card not look utterly dogshit so they compare it against cards with DLSS on, very fair....
Everyone knows without DLSS 3 card is just a downgraded 3060. It would be fire if some mod introduces DLSS 3 on 30 series.
Really? There are many benchmarks with DLSS off showing 4060 wiping the floor with 3060
I'll wait a little bit more until they release something that isn't bullshit, for now im happy with my 1660. Raw performance is what really matters, and even if i had an RTX card i won't be using raytracing because mehh. Of course it looks good, not gonna lie, but it isn't something that makes me say ohh my god, i need that ;/ also, the only reason why im still with Nvidia is for their graphics tecnologies for the other games, like Nvidia Flex, PhysX, etc, and AMD doesn't have any of that.
Trash
The card is saved by performance per watts hopping for a low profile upgrade to rtx a2000 maybe? #RTXOn
We need the original frames from the game, we don't need DLSS virtual frames
Shit graphics...where are the raytraced shadows, the indirect bounces, the reflections? - We been using shadowmapping for 40years Nvidia, get a move on ffs!!!
I feel that the 4060ti at $350 solves all of the issues with the regular 4060. There’s no need for 2 video cards at that price point. They have a great upscaling technology with DLSS3 and Framegen and they shoot themselves in the foot.
"great upscaling technology" doesn't produce good framerate, and framegen additionally hurts your input lag. Which is fine if you have 60-80 fps, but not when you are close to 40's. And as it is a 60 model, it will meet with 40 fps alot.
@@ARCAD3BLOOD but DLSS does allow for lower resolutions which can run at higher framerate and the upscaling results are great. Framegen is not perfect but a lot of people have said that it works fine and the benefits outweigh the drawbacks. We cannot expect 3080 or 4090 performance from a video card in a $300 range. It'd be awesome but unrealistic. The 4060Ti priced at $349 is a phenomenal value. Actually, I would love if my XSX and PS5 had a 4060-grade SOC with DLSS and Frame-gen. There'd be no stutters like PC or settings to deal with, almost all games would run at 80-100fps (uncapped) and it would handle raytracing - especially Insomniac's or UE5's Lumen - like a champ with DLSS Quality. But the current consoles are pretty impressive and it all comes down to game design more so than GPU capabilities.
@@techsamurai11 4060 lineup is priced wrongly, has not enough vram, and are DOA. For cheaper price you can get 6700xt. XSX and ps5 still use upscaling, And will be included in amd's fram gen. you're not loosing alot by consoles not using nvidia, they already are using their own upscaler anyway. "We cannot expect 3080 or 4090 performance from a video card in a $300 range." Strawman argument. Yes, it will not have, doesn't mean we cannot expect some level of performance.
@@ARCAD3BLOOD With regard to consoles, the use of FSR in Jedi Survivor and Final Fantasy 16 - 2 AAA titles - is now becoming its own issue. The developers are using FSR with DRS and when resolution dips too low, FSR is struggling to reconstruct a stable image except when there is no motion. FSR3 will hopefully bring improvements but we'll see what it does. As for the 4060, it does some things well. It's a disappointment sometimes when compared to the previous gen GPUs - the 2070 and 3060. However, in some things it performs well especially once DLSS and FrameGen3 are used and can deliver surprisingly good performance. The 4060 needs a bit more and faster RAM and the same Cudas as the 3060 for $300 and it would have been a great vide card.
@@techsamurai11 But it doesn't have it. It's not a good card. It's dead on arrival, and Dlss won't change how consoles works. Deal with it.