It has been brought up a lot lately, so I wanted to make a video on the topic.
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @thehockeyguy
Join us on our discord to chat hockey, talk with others during the game, share pet pictures, and more.
/ discord
Order jerseys from Ben H Sports while saving 10% off the listed eBay prices by sending him an email regarding jerseys you spot in his listings. ben.hoogenband@yahoo.ca Just tell him Shannon sent you.
Support The Hockey Guy via Patreon / thehockeyguy
/ youtubehockeyguy
Instagram: thgshannon and thg_cats
Spoutible: spoutible.com/TheHockeyGuy
TheHockeyGuy.yt@gmail.com
Contact me via snail mail at:
The Hockey Guy
PO Box 15038 Seven Oaks PO
Abbotsford, BC
V2S 8P1
In the USA:
Shannon Skanes
1125 Fir Avenue
Suite 119
Blaine, WA 98230
should be called Pluses and Minuses of NHL's +/- Stat
I was today years old when I found out that plus/minus doesn't include power play points...
Like the joke at the beginning of the video …” where is everybody going? … 😂😂
+/- without context is meaningless. But in context it can say a bunch.
Nicely summed up!
context isn't a magic word, how much context is enough to make it useful? what kind of context?
+/- would unfairly destroy stats for penalty killers if powerplays counted.
Here's a random thing I recently looked at, Wayne Gretzky was a -80 in his last six seasons 😮
That Gretzky guy must’ve sucked. My +/- in the NHL is at 0 so I must be better right?
He played on some shitty LA and NYR teams in his last few seasons (his stint in STL is too small a sample to consider).
@@mcj44 Gretz for his career was +520. What are you talking about?
@@timetowakeup6302 It’s a joke.
@@mcj44 👀
+/- is mostly a team stat, but you can still draw some decent conclusions if you compare teams in similar situations. Ex: Forsling this year was +10 better than the next player in the NHL, and +23 on the next guy on the team. So we can infer that Forsling had a great defensive season even beyond the team's great performance, especially when you consider his normal partner in Ekblad missed more than 30 games, and Gus still led in +/-. But no +/- is not an end all, be all, then again no stat should be an end all, be all. If you want to use +/- as a factor in determining a player's season it should at best a secondary or tertiary factor, not the primary. Basically, numbers can be misleading, just watch the guys play.
Funny stat that used to have an award, then basically was seen as worthless. It got its place, just like most other stats.
Like GAA
Exactly. It's not a "hard" stat like a goalie's save percentage. It's a "relative"/"trend" stat that's only useful over time/across a group. What's the average +/- for each line on a team during a game? Which one underperformed? Which team has the best/worst +/- across the league?
@@dnasty312 Exactly. It's why more people look at Save Percentage.
I'm one of Erik Karlsson's biggest fans, and +/- is a stat that doesn't do him any favours. Over his career he has been on the ice for 63 empty net goals for and 115 empty net goals against, so - 52. This really killed him on the Sharks - last season he was - 26 but actually - 10, and in 21-22 he was - 14 but actually even. Earlier in his career it wasn't as bad (in 10-11 he was - 30 but only - 3 in EN) but coaches pull goalies earlier now than they did in the early 2010s. In EK's career with SJ he was - 67 but without EN - 19 - that's how drastic the numbers can be for a guy with his deployment on bad teams. Also, he's the top PP guy on his teams but doesn't kill penalties, or rarely does, so he has been on for 72 PP goals against but only 20 shorthanded goals for, so - 52. (He's - 99 for career, those EN and special teams numbers are - 104). Compare that to his favourite partner in Ottawa, Methot, who had 1 PPGA and 18 SHGF, or +17. And though I don't know the specific numbers, his EN +/- was aided by the fact that he defended leads and was on for many empty net goals for. A lot of shutdown D-men types have good +/- because they aren't on for ENGA, on for many ENGF, and win the special teams +/- battle. Marcus Pettersson is a great example. And then there's also the little things that bother me about it. The past two years EK has had like seven assists at ES where he wasn't credited with the plus because he got off the ice just before the goal was scored. Or sometimes he isn't even off the ice yet but the player replacing him jumps on in that "buffer zone" and they get the plus instead. It's a very flawed stat, best to be used with all this context in mind, especially if looking over a career.
It's also not just empty net goals either. Late in games before you pull the goalie the trailing team will start taking extra risks. Those could be extra pinches or forwards cheating up the ice among other things. If you're on a bad team you're going to be the trailing team more often so your +/- is going to be hurt by taking the additional risks whereas if you're on a good team you're going to benefit from the other team taking the risks.
Should probably rewrite the stuff like “- 10” to “-10” or avoid using dashes because currently they’re very much blending together But I like the write up
I LOVE the Solar Bears jersey!!! I didn't know you owned that one :D
That jersey is sick!! The color scheme is great
@@Nate-vq8wy It's like their 2nd or 3rd jersey but I love it. I'm actually going to their playoff game next week so it was a nice surprise to see
Could Utah borrow those? That's the kind of color scheme NHL needs right now
@@JPS47 That would be a nice color scheme for Utah now that you mention it
Just bet your money that if its a hockey jersey, theres a chance that Shannon already have it 😂
5:53 “he plays for Chicago Blackhawks”
Love the Solar Bears jersey! Thanks for explaining this!
I've always kind of hated the +/-. It often tells more about the team than the players themselves and it gets more skewed the more playtime the player has.
The Blackhawks players are highlighted in this video, so to should Alex Vlasic who played 76 games and was -4. I watched many Hawks games this year and unlike his teammates, Vlasic was strong along the boards and very reliable with the puck. It was noticeable and backed up in +/- compared to his peers. It is worth pointing this out, and I think his new contract is possibly the most team friendly in the NHL.
Amother great video your the only person i heard talk about this and Thank you for that .
I think maybe a better stat would be “plus minus relative to team average”. Usually the best teams will be mostly full of + players with a couple minuses who stand out. And vice versa for bad teams.
It might be a bit better but it'd still be a bad stat. If someone is a massive outlier on their team that's one thing, but your best players are going to get a lot of minutes when you're down by a goal or two late in a game and you start taking extra risks ranging from extra pinches/cheating out of the zone to pulling your goalie. I remember at one point last season Karl was out for a full 5 minute shift with the goalie pulled. Your fourth liners are probably stapled to the bench in those situations and your third line might get an occasional shift, but most coaches are going to rely on their best players at the end of games when they need a goal.
@@jonmendelson1104 Yeah that’s a good point.
Very informative! Thank you.
I love this stat I know it’s not everything but it can definitely change how I feel about a player
I've never clicked on a THG video this fast. I love all your content, but the "boring" hockey talk is fascinating. Your research and in-depth analysis is such a refreshing change from the clickbaity content that most hockey accounts put out. Thanks!
IIRC, Larry Robinson has a career +/- of around + 612. A statistic that still blows my mind.
Makar deserves to win it again! Go Avs Go
"I'm gonna talk about plus/minus stats.... Where's every is going"? Funny. Dad joke stuff for sure. Love your content THG. Love from Finland P.s I see no Leaf's guys in either plus or minus side.??? One would think Toronto's defense would be high in minus stats.
great dive brother
Having PP goals count in +/- would make the stat even more useless, since then you wouldn’t be able to fairly compare team members with each other in this regard as not every player gets powerplay time (on which it’s way easier to score and not get scored on).
As a defense man i can say you said the most important thing that its a stat you can use on a nightly basis to see if a player is on the ice for point production or defending points form being scored. I absolutely agree with you that the +/- stat should be used on not only PP but on PK as well
Great video Shannon! And especially talking about the Norris race. The numbers don't lie when it comes to defensive ability. Also love the jersey! i recently just bought the Avalanche colorado retro makar jersey XD My collection is slowly growing lol
Loving the Solar Bears rep
Love the Solar Bears sweater. Been in FL for 23 years. Been to a few games.
Love the solar bears sweater
I can't believe I caught this right away. I also totally love this discussion!
I remember back in 17-18, when OEL was still an elite d-man, he had sth like -31, and analyst said that thing takes nothing away from him because he was the only great d-man on that coyote team so whenever they were scored on, he was on the ice all the time.
18:38 described what happen to Calen Addison in Minnesota.
Close to -20 of Bedard's -44 was 6 on 5 empty netters.
I think the stat is good for direct comparisons. Looks at the top 5 teams in GAA, goal diff, or scoring. Then look at the +/- of those top respective teams area (D men for top gaa teams, forwards for top scoring, etc) and i think you can clearly see who the top performers are in those areas.
Solar Bears! That jersey is fantastic, I only have the white one.
Would love to see a comparison of the top +/- over the years and see where they ended up in the Norris race.
I agree. I think Makar has shown more defensive capabilities in his stat line than Hughes i.e. penalties taken/drawn and giveaways/takeaways. I guess we will see what happens, but I am guessing they are going to give it to Hughes, because of his point TOTAL and +/-.
Couldn’t agree more on plus/minus and the pplay..
Including PP in plus-minus stats would skew the plus side toward the few players who play on the PP special team. Think about it... teams put their best players out on the PP and that's when goals are more likely to happen. Third and fourth line forwards get shafted.
Also why add the pp goals for and not against. So if you do that suddenly your pk guys look horrible
Alright, but why count empty net situations?
Agreed, remove them too.
Im 1000% in agreement with you about powerplay counting for +/-. Preach!
Bedard 18 and starting at first line center wing to put up them points is AMAZING all on its own!
I've always liked +/-. No, it's not an all-encompassing stat that determines how good a player is at defense, but it's actually fairly handy to compare it in the aggregate across a whole team over time, or a player over their whole career. The key is that you have to know the context of the team a player played on, or an era a team played in. But within that context, it can be useful.
the plus minus of plus minus?
I'd argue it's all minus.
Powerplay points are a factor, although it doesn't change the picture amongst Norris finalists this year. All 3 of them are close with Josi 33 PPP, Hughes 38 PPP and Makar 39 PPP.
People arguing Faber over Bedard for Calder, while citing +/- as a consequential reason, is pretty ridiculous to me.
Don’t forget all Faber’s secondary assists!!! 😂
Dude Bedard missed so much time and still put up those numbers lol I hope he puts on some weight for next season though. Faber is gonna be great for the Wild though!
I would say that for forward +- is not as important as for defencemen
@@Nate-vq8wyBedard didn't break his jaw because of weight.
@@Cacuna I'd say it's equally as useless for both forwards and defensemen.
The players know who is the best at their position. Only they should vote.
Imagine what Sakic's career plus minus would be if you counted all his points on the PP!
As good as Sakic's numbers would be, could you imagine Bobby Orr's?
I think is great for like a 5-7 game stretch
Im a new hockey fan and to me +/- feels kind of similar to pitcher wins in baseball.
Orr and Robinson should be up there as footnotes.
I like the stat in small sample sizes, like loss/win streaks or playoff series, but I think that it’s more a stat about the coach’s decisions rather than the player’s performance.
It's more skewed in small sample sizes like playoff series, therefore less reliable than over a full season. I mean, if you get 3 or 4 home games against Edmonton and you get the duty of matching up with McDavid's line, you're not likely to have a favorable rating. Over a full season most teams roll the top 4 except for maybe a handful of home games where the coach feels matchups are necessary.
Second assist is silly sometimes
I think the +/- is a decent measure for a players performance for a single game but doesn’t say much beyond that.
You should get press passes and get to vote. How do we make that happen?
Should power play shots be counted seperately from even strengthed shots?
As an even further rabbit hole does +/- count goals scored on delayed penalties
plus/minus always seemed like a real “arbitrary” sabermetric stat where it’s supposed to be a catch-all stat, but in reality doesn’t say much of anything, like OPS in baseball. the layman can look at the stat and get the impression that a player is having a great season/series when they haven’t really been playing that well.
I always viewed the +\- stat as relative to the whole team. If everybody else on your team has a (-40) then it can’t be expected from somebody like Bedard to have a positive. The +\- stat is only really relevant when one player is highly above or below the average for the rest of the team
Are these the small magnets that THG been talking about that he has hundreds of lol
It's a good stat, shows which defensemen are on the ice when the opponent scores. Plenty of minuses = bad defending.
Or being on a bad team. Put Forsling in Chicago or San Jose and see that +56 go to - instead.
Who was the guy behind the bench when the goal was scored?
How about if you did something like an adjusted plus/minus (not sure what the appropriate name for this stat would be), where instead of looking at the raw plus/minus of the individual player, you instead look at the difference between their raw plus/minus and the average plus/minus of the rest of their team? Think this could go a long way toward removing the bias in the stat inherent with being on a good or bad team. Regarding the power play, how about a compromise? Count power play goals as a plus for the players on the scoring team, but not as a negative against the players on the negative team.
You can make this argument for every stat. assists.... 1st compared to 2nd. (pass to the playmaker..... 2nd assist) goals...... be on McDavid's line and turn into a 50+ goal scorer. Being on a really strong team will boost your stats, same as being on a weak team. etc. etc.
Maybe they can do a +/- | - It would show how far above/below specific players are in comparison to their teammates collective average +/-
Great opening! I had to stay for the whole video just because of that. I loved your Bedard analysis. Perfect.
So based on all of your knowledge and observation, who do you think deserves the Norris this year?
Its an important complimentary stat
Forsling +56, Montour +1, same team, top minutes.
+/- is best used to compare against team mates. For instance, if you are the only plus, or only minus, on a team over a certain stretch, then it can be used to help dig deeper into how a player is performing vis-a-vis their team mates. When used to compare with players on other teams, it begins to fall apart and is pretty useless.
I love plus/minus. After “advanced” stats became a thing, I thought of p/m as the original advanced stat. As with any data point, it should not be used exclusively, but rather as part of a whole to give the number context.
If you are take the penalty, you should also get dinged on the plus/ minus. [Probably not for things like bench minors].
OMG a Solar Bears sweater 😢
Let the #THG4AwardsVoter campaign commence.
Where’s everybody going? Went to the store and I’m back with snacks to enjoy the video :>
I think plus monus is a very good stat. Back in the day, David Backes had at least one season where he had 30 goals, 30 assists, and + 30. If i had 6 players like that on my team, i get the cup every year. I do agree with your logic on the pp and pk. That never made sense.
+/- is the stat I laugh at the most. People always bring it up as a means of a "gotcha". It's like Goalie Wins. A goalie could have 40 wins, but each game could have been won 5-4. It's just a general, old, outdated stat. It's a Team Stat, not an indiviudal stat.
I suspect the thinking for excluding PP goals when the stat was created was it was unfair to give penalty killers, who are operating at a significant disadvantage, the same minus as for even strength goals. Which led to the idea of not giving minuses or pluses to either side for PP goals. Maybe use - call it a power plus minus - which gives pluses to skaters on the ice for PP goals without giving minuses to the opposing penalty killers? Not sure this would be any more meaningful.
But then why give players who are on the ice with the goalie pulled who are operating at a significant disadvantage the same minus as even strength goals?
The NHL needs a good stat to measure defensive performance. +/- is used because the NHL does not make advanced defensive stats more accessible to fans and the media.
THG should be able to vote.
One problem with including power plays - some teams use their first unit almost the entire power play.. The Rangers, usually figure they are AT LEAST 1:20, unless they just got off the ice. You get a player who may be +10, say, 5-on-5, and another is +5. If Mr. +10 is on the PP, if you count the PP, he may be +30!! Makes the difference look HUGE. Show you how much PP stats inflate numbers - who was second on the Rangers in 5-on-5 goals this year behind Panarin? Kreider? Trocheck? Zibanejad? No. Lafreniere. 26. Same number Kreider had a couple years ago... when he had 52 overall... but Laffs doesn't get much PP time.
Jason Dickinson was +4 for Chicago while playing every game during the regular season and having the 5th most time on excluding goalies so what does that say about him?
Do you think the NHL should have an all-defensive team with 3 forwards and 2 defensemen on first and second teams? Just like the NBA has with all-defensive team and MLB with the gold glove.
This is why, for me, even though I love Hughes, Makar is the Norris winner.
I’ll pitch a wild idea, but what about giving 0.5 +/- point to PP goals, and reward PK players with 0.5 +/- point as well when they kill a penalty? I don’t think you should penalize a team for pk goals. Tho might be tricky to determine who gets those pk +/- lol
I don't think that +/- should include empty net goals or special teams. I think we should use separate stats to track those situations. For the special situations, I think it should be a net goals per minute stat rather than a total +/-. Then you could look at a good penalty killer having better than 0.1 net goals per minute conceded, or a good power play scorer having more than 0.1 net goals per minute scored type of thing. And something similar could be done for empty net goals and goals scored with the extra attacker (although how to handle situations where it's not 6 on 5 while the net is empty, because of players in the penalty box, and how to handle delayed penalty extra attackers is certainly complicated). You make a good point about scoring a few seconds after a power play ends, but I don't know of a good way to try to account for those situations.
It makes so little sense that the stat is applicable for the penalty-kill but not the powerplay. It should really count for both or neither.
I finally see a guy at the top on a list from my birthplace, yes! That most mean that +/- is the most important stat! Give that guy norris, hart and art ross thophy and why not vezina too 😉
I believe, plus / minus get credited during 4 on 4 & 3 on 3 situations - also... Correct me, IF I am wrong.
From the NHL glossary: Plus-minus, +/- In a sense, plus-minus was hockey's first enhanced stat, becoming an official NHL statistic in 1959-60. Plus-minus is a team's goal differential while a particular player is on the ice, excluding power play goals for and against but including empty net situations. All the skaters on the ice receive a plus or minus when an even-strength goal or shorthanded goal is scored depending on which team scored; plus-minus is not tracked for goalies.
+/- shouldn't include PP because it serves to measure the contribution the player has on his team scoring more goals. If you include PK, then it moves that stat down for PK players => it does the opposite of what we're trying to show. Here's a simple trick to keep your +/- higher than the rest of your team in Shannon's stat world: take a lot of penalties!
why did the preds get rid of ekholm
I hate the plus/minus stat, always have. Hockey is a team sport-why should an individual who just stepped on the ice seconds before a goal is scored be hit with a minus? Get rid of it!
If he stepped onto the ice seconds before his team scored, he'd be credited with a plus. It's fairly rare and evens out. It's not something to base your hate on.
@@jefflarson1652 Sorry, but plus/minus favors the good teams. Bad teams get screwed by it. Stats show that. Get rid of it!
@@Bogieking78 Nobody is rewarding a Stanley Cup for it. It's not a reliable measurement to compare players on different teams, but it has its uses. Just last night Ray Ferraro said that it's a source of pride in the locker room to be a plus player. That means it's putting the thought of defensive responsibility into their heads. Being -8 on a team where the average is -25 is still more of an accomplishment than being +8 on a team that averages +25.
Pavel Datsyuk "won" the NHL's "Best +/- award" a few years in a row, then suddenly the award disappeared.
Remember when Ovechkin scored 51 goals while going minus-35? Capitals didn’t make the Playoffs that year. The next three years, out in two rounds. Then they won their Cup vs. Vegas Ovechkin was +40 those four years, while scoring 78 PPG’s. Yes it’s a flawed stat; it can also be quite telling.
I think plus minus is an underrated stat that shouldn’t be taken at face value and will always need more context when looking at a players plus minus. There are a lot of factors that can either boost or negatively impact a players plus minus.
A game between Calgary and Carolina is tied 4-4 going into the third period. Carolina scores to take a 5-4 lead, and no more scoring happens. Carolina wins in regulation; no overtime is played. A game between Montreal and Detroit is tied 4-4 going into the third period. Detroit gets a penalty, and on the resulting power play Montreal scores, taking a 5-4 lead. No more scoring happens. Does the game go into overtime? No? Then power play goals count just as much as other goals. If you don't want power play goals, you can do two things: a) improve your penalty killing or b) don't commit penalties.
I might piss off the stats needs, but Corsi and Fenwick always felt like fancy +/- to me
There have been countless articles that skewer both Corsi and Fenwick for the exact same reasons +/- gets hit for. Hockey is not a sport where advanced analytics are anywhere as useful as baseball. Baseball is pretty cut and dried. Batter vs pitcher is a matchup of two individuals. The only thing in hockey that compares are penalty shots or breakaways and those just don't happen often enough to make comparisons.
If you are on a really good team and everyone is a plus and you are a -10, something is amiss in your play. And vice versa, if a guy is a +15 on a bad team thats impressive. Its flawed but interesting and fun in my opinion
Ovechkin was a -35 in 2013-14. I remember people saying how awful he was He had 39 power play points that year. Really didnt make sense to me
i didnt know they dont count powerplay goals to the +/- 😄, all goals should be counted in +/- or there should be 5v5 +/- and special team +/-😆
There are so many debatable metrics to weigh on this one that it certainly deserves the 22 min breakdown from THG. Sometimes it does matter and other times it’s deceiving is where I leave it 😂
+/- can sometimes be misleading. But when it comes to the difference between Luke Hughes and Simon Nemec, it's not.