Ibn Taymiyya - The Father of Salafism?
In this video we talk about a scholar who represents the very opposite tendency compared to many other figures we have discussed on this channel. Ibn Taymiyya is a controversial thinker, but one that has had a major impact on the contemporary Islamic world.
Sources/Suggested Reading:
Abrahamov, Binyamin (1998). "Islamic Theology: Traditionalism and Rationalism. Edinburgh University Press.
El-Rouayheb, Khaled & Sabine Schmidtke (2019). "The Oxford Handbook of Islamic Theology". Oxford University Press.
Hoover, Jon (2019). "Ibn Taymiyya". In the Makers of the Muslim World Series. OneWorld.
Moustafa, Mohamed A. (2017). "Upholding God's Essence: Ibn Taymiyya on the Createdness of the Spirit". Journal for the History of Islamic Philosophy and Sciences. 3(2): 1-43.
Skeikh, Mustafa (2007). "Ibn Taymiyya, Analogy and the Attributes of God". Faculty of Theology, University of Oxford.
#IbnTaymiyya #Islam #Salafism
Thank you so much Philip for all the amazing content that you post on your channel. I was looking for this video for so long. It came right on time. If you can do another one on Ibn Al Qayim Al Djawziya that would be awesome. Once again a million thanks :)
Thank you. I I truly appreciate your very informative topics in your videos!
One can not understand ibn taymiyya without understanding the situation of the middle east in his time. The middle east today is very similar to his time, a divided post-caliphate muslim world. This is why he's very popular
You're right
It is true, but his influence is more widespread due to Pan-Islamism and the lack of any substantial power in the region. Although divided, the Mamluk Sultanate was strong, defeating the Crusader and Ilkhanate armies North and West
He is very popular because he was invoked by wahhabi+saudi movement to overtake the rule of Hijaz from the Hashimites, and with enough oil money and the appearance of legitimacy of governing the two holiest cities in Islam you have the situation we have today.
@@ayyashC no, he was also as famous as now before the formation of Saudi Arabia
no it is not the same, today is different kind of worse and but not in every aspects in his time the abbasid caliphate was still existing in egypt as a religious leadership under the political power of mamelooks, but today , Britain and the european powers managed to extinguish the caliphate for good, and the west imposed its plans on the region and forbade any chance for the return of unified muslim state but in the same time there is more access to information and people are more free but not all free from the belief of myths and the lies of suffism
Whoa. This is one massive achievement. You should really be proud of what you just did. Thank you so much my man!
stop bothering him by asking are you muslim are you muslim ! better to search .
@@wriimonmir it’s a little weird of you to tell this commenter to stop saying something when they’re not even saying that in the comment..
kzhead.info/sun/dayNkq6phJN8dK8/bejne.html
check out some of the top scholars whose works are in subtitles and translated, Sheikh Fawzan, Sh Albani, Sh bin Baz, Sh Uthaymin, Ahmad Najmi, Abdul Mohsin al Abbad, AbdurRazzaq Badr, Solomon Ruhayli, Sh Rabee Madkhali, Muhammad bin Hadi, Sh. Muhammad & Ahmad Bazmul, etc. Good pdf : 3 Fundamental principles of Islam by Ibn Abdul Wahab 4 principles of Shirk by Ibn Abdul Wahab Pillars, conidtions and requirement of prayer by Ibn Abdul Wahab Prophet's prayer as you see him by Sheikh Albani Aqida Wasitiyah by Ibn Taymiyyah Usul Us Sunna by Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal Islamic Aqida and it's History by Muhammad Aman al Jami!
I really like to view : Scholarly subtitles, People of Knowledge, and Hidaya translations, Masjid Ribat, Sunnah discourse, DarusSunnah, FaruqPost, PathtotheSalaf, eesa bin roy, Ayyub al-Mahdi, Salafeeya, etc.
This is a fascinating video that puts a lot of what we’re seeing today in its proper perspective. Thank you for this delightfully respectful, truthful, and entertaining video!
yes, we see muslims defending killing apostates largely based on ibn taimayya. what do you think of his fatwa of his calling for the killing the druze as apostates?
Informative, objective and accurate illustration as usual. Thank you brother.
Great video. Well balanced & insightful as always
This so informative and concise that does not compete for time...Thank you for sharing
Thanks. Great as always. Please make a detailed video on how neoplatonism, gnosticism and sufism have influenced Ismailism. Would love to see your take on it.
One of the greatest imams in all of time ❤
True
fazur rahman...d 1988..AND shk Qaradawee..d 1926..?:as to the end? true or not?
Praised be ibn tayimmia because he destroyed islam and saved us from this effort. Since ibn tayimmia islam is in decline and losing itself.
@@sagn1962 ..othe rcomment abiove..qaradawee..didnt die in 1926....? ur comment too sorry to say bit misleading apologies for own mis understandiung.....ibn taymaya did sewrv ice or not..to ie worlds solution islam...?..u hav emuslim name..suspicion sinful..r u muslim ? as to islam decline far from...still growing in numbers...fastestb growing today..y?..yes quality c.f to quantity..zionmiasm..has the capital power
wow...talking falsehood..u the reason ior the satans..trutrh is free as as speech too..ty..may Allah Allaha as jesus called Him too..ie not his self..ie pray to himself....reward us all..have a song..through heavens eyes..the the ...stevens things..meeeeeooooow... Allah bless ..as His light shines on..deut 33 1 2 3...the fig tree chapter...palestine olive hill...freedom awaits...Allah Akbar
this video was really good. Congrats on the accurate information and comments.
This Salafi moment reminds me a lot of the broader Protestant and Puritan Christian movements in the much later centuries that aimed to "purify" the dominant religion which was perceived to have strayed away it's origin both carrying a similar legacy in their respective realms of influence (but obviously with different overall timelines/trajectories). There is also some ideological similarity in his legal approach to what we would call Constitutional Originalism in the modern United States.
I was thinking the exact same thing. Protestantism and Salafism are essentially the same movement but one resulted in a very liberal culutre and the other a very conservative one
@@emZee1994 I disagree, both have resulted in varying degrees of progressivism and conservatism at different points in time. And ultimately while both are technically "radical" their goal is to conserve a form of religiosity that they perceive as true, pure, and original. Those two theological movements, although coming from a similar thought process, they have been impacted by different material cultures and histories which impacts how they are perceived by wider society and between societies.
Also - it seems to me - they both have a literalist approach when it comes to how they intrepret the religious texts.
@@SanFranFan30 Two parallel lines starting from different points will end at different points. This doesn't deny the parallel aspect (although I agree that this is oversimplification, unlike atoms, subjects involving humans cannot be put into mathematical formulas)
@@ChannelDefault spot on.
What a great, balanced and informative video. Thank you so much. God bless you!!!
I'm a native Arabic Muslim and I've been researching Islamic literature for as far as i can remember, and to be honest, your coverage was far beyond my imagination and exposed me to some ideas i have never thought of. Great effort man really appreciate it 🙏
Well, I'm a native Arab ex-Muslim and this channel is my favorite in term of honest research, no BIAS in favor or against any mythology including Islam. Other KZheadrs( atheists and theists) are subjective in their reporting . I literally never heard about Ikhwan al-Safa or Al-Hachachin until I started following this amazing channel.
Doubt
@@farhatk6054 why you left islam? Is islam really not true or it is but we see it from radical pov
@@farhatk6054 why have you left Islam? I've never found a good reason for it
@@zaryabshah3268 @عمر I left Islam znd religion over all simply because when you (really) dig into it, it does not make any sense, for Islam for instance, a lot of Quranic verses and stories of Muhamed spitting the moon, riding on a horse to the 7th sky where Allah exists ( I thought he were everywhere ?) and tons of stories that completely contradicts science and basic common sense.
Hats Off to your devotion, good interpretation and presentation. Much Respect!
Amazing work, thanks for your efforts this was an extremely well done and accurate put together video
This truly is an outstanding work!
Very well done, highly objective and precise.
Great video, it would've been nice to hear more about his refutation of deductive theology, bit nice summary ما شاء اللَّه!
please enable auto generated subtitles. It will help those who dont speak English as first language. Great video, please make more of these
Great video. We absolutely love a video on Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya
Amazing video!. Would love to see a video on Ibn Al Qayyim the foremost student of Ibn Taymiyyah.
The distinguished students of Ibn Taymiyyah are many and they had a great influence in the Islamic library, some of them excelled in jurisprudence, interpretation of the Qur’an, doctrine, etc.
@@user-kj8yl6sn2z tell us some of theese other students other than ibn Qayyim
@@dom3073 ibn Rajab, Ad dhahabi, Ibn kathir
Islamic medicine, if there's any, covered by Ibnul Qoyyim Al Jauzi, this topic is good for future video
@@dom3073 there is ibn rajab a very known hanbali scholar which rulings are still followed till today by hanbali scholars, Al-dhahabi which work on hadith is used by everyone, and ibn kathir, which tafsir is the most well known and famous today, mohammad ibn abdul hadi al-maqdisi the writer of Al-mu7arrir in hadith, jamal al-deen al-muzzi the one who wrote tahtheeb al-kamal, A very known book in hadith, ibn mufli7 al-maqdisi, who also is known for his hanbali fiqh
This is alot of work you have done. Thanks
Impressive! Very brief but full of knowledge.
What can my enemies do to me? My Paradise is in my heart; it goes with me wherever I am. If they kill me, it is martyrdom. If they exile me from my land, it is a vacation in the Path of Allah. If they imprison me, it is to allow me a private devotion with Allah. Ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullaah).
He was not a good person, he was full of hate and was looking for a ways to justify killing other human beings
and he said 'kill the druze'. what do you think of that?
Alhamdulillah!!! Here is yet another informative golden gem in my my way to the journey of Islam. Thanks a lot. It couldn't be much better!!!
May Allah keep you on the truth and being vigilant !
@@Bat7Yamhe doesn't interpret anything he just explains what other people/scholars have said...
Thank for the great work you done ❤
Another great teaching brother. Thoroughly enjoyed it.
Sacking? Mongols sacking Baghdad is quite putting lightly. They slaughtered at least a quarter million ppl like animals and raized the city to ground. If they only sacked, seen some art and literature would have been saved.
Is there any archaeological proof of the quarter-million claim?
@@genekalutsky8813 They burned people like they burned books. Can't find proof if ppl turned to dust if thats what you are implying.
@@Roland_Deschain The burning of the books was invented in 14th century AFAIK. And modern estimates for victims of the sacking do not exceed 90 000
@@Roland_Deschain People don't burn up completely even in crematoria. The quarter-million victims claims are clearly exaggerated.
@@genekalutsky8813 Burning books have happened since ancient times from Greece to China
Excellent, absolutely informative - very well done , as expected . Is there a chain of theologians which exists till 19 - 20 th century .
Awesome work! Thank you!
i'm really enjoying the change up to a different type of figure/history of a different ideological movement.
So salafism rose during the Mongolian invasion and revived during the colonial invasion 🤔
its much deeper
Ibn Taymiyyah didn’t have much followers after his death
Salafism is a modern movement. He is simply a retroactive influence on it
@@thirdocean3784 Unfortunately, mostly women i've heard because of his stances on divorce, which was much more relax than conservative scholars, but Allah knows best.
Welp looks like we know what's coming due to western invasions...
May Allah have mercy on him Aameen. Sheikhul Islam
do you agree with ibn taimayya that the druze should be killed as apostates?
@@user-on8jx3qr8w if they are declared believers who then committed apostasy under a Khilafat, then absolutely yes.
@@shahriar4706 yeah, so how do you square that with Islam supposedly being a tolerant religion? 'the religion of peace' and of course the oft quoted 2:256? I'm i correct to assume you equate someone leaving Islam with 'treason'? what do you think of the verse fo the koran that says someone believed, then disbelieved and then believed again and so forth? did they always 'repent' in 3 days and therefore weren't killed?
@@shahriar4706 إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ ءَامَنُوا۟ ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا۟ ثُمَّ ءَامَنُوا۟ ثُمَّ كَفَرُوا۟ ثُمَّ ٱزْدَادُوا۟ كُفْرًۭا لَّمْ يَكُنِ ٱللَّهُ لِيَغْفِرَ لَهُمْ وَلَا لِيَهْدِيَهُمْ سَبِيلًۢا ١٣٧ 4:137 Indeed, those who believed then disbelieved, then believed and again disbelieved-˹only˺ increasing in disbelief-Allah will neither forgive them nor guide them to the ˹Right˺ Way. -no mention of needing to kill them? again, am i correct to assume you get your fiqh form the 84th book of bukhari and the quote of muhammad: 'whoever changes his [islamic] religion, kill him'?
What you want to say exactly @user-on8jx3qr8w
Thanks for this it is very enlightening!
Thank you for this video!
Excellent video, and a fair coverage IMO. Since you spoke about Bi-La Kayf and Kalam, can you also make videos about Al-ash'ari, Athari, and Al-Maturadi, and the Islamic theology of absolute rationalism (late mu'tazilah)? EDIT: Also hoping you explain to people tawil and tafwid.
Mut'azila are weirdos
@@bayern1445 just like the wobblers
@@r.a1301 What is your problem with Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab رحمه الله ?
That should be left to Islamic theologians
those who lie about Allah?
Awesome, I suggest that you make a video about people who lived when Moghols attacked the Islamic countries.There are lots of people who had a great influence on Islamic world that lived in that century, people like Rumi or Ghazali or some of the most famous Iranian poets. I think it would be great if you analize their life through the context which they lived in. There is no time in Islamic world that they have this number of famous people.
Ghazali has much to answer for
He already made a video on imam-al-ghazali..
Ghazali lived before the mongol invasion . His influence in the Islamic world is gigantic compared to Ibn tahmiyah. The reason why ibn tahmiyah didn't have a lot of influence during his time is because of imam ghazali. Of course it would have been nice if they lived at the same time. Tahmiyah would have learned a thing or two about Islam through imam ghazali. Not to say that ibn tahmiyah was less of a scholar. Afterall he was called Shaykh al-Islām.
@@vinlondon8904 hahahaha how ignorant of you comparing sheikh al Islam ibn taymiya to al Ghazali obviously Ibn taymiya is way beyond his league because unlike Ghazali ibn tamiya sticks to Quran and sunnah Ghazali didn’t that why in his last days it was very very hard for him to get out from doubts
@@ismailmounsif1109 shake Islam my ass, every one hate us because of him
Great effort and excellent presentation, thank you.
thank you.. such a beautiful explanation..
As a modern Salafi, I wanted to thank you for a fair and objective presentation about this topic - you were careful with your words and despite the very difficult subject matter, you really treated it like a completely unbiased documentary. That is truly hard to find nowadays; may Allah reward you.
You have goat beards. You follow the goat. Not God. Wild goatmen.
@@cowsmuggler1646 the Prophet sullalahu alaihi wasallam was a much better man than you, as was Jesus, as was Moses - you are nothing compared to them, yet you make fun of them, and only show your own stupidity and corruption. They all had beards, and if you do not then you are more like a woman than a man.
@@cowsmuggler1646 Why attack em, because he looks like a man? (Unlike you)
@@cowsmuggler1646 vegetable
That's because people are united on division
Wauv! Thank you. I'm not muslim, but I really enjoyed watching it, since I like to understand the problems with(in) islam in the world today. Thank you, once again! Keep more coming, please!!
The problem in islamic world is made by the west to steal oil from the desert .
It’s natural to have schematics in every religion.
Saw the whole video. Thank you!
Thank you for the informative video.
As a person who read a lot of ibn teymiyye's work a long time ago, this is a video i waited a lot
You should do Ibn Hanbal next!
Bro this was really good one🙌
Brilliant! Thank you.
11:29 Ibn Taymiyyah wasn't against dhikr, this is completely false . The asal of dhikr is established from Qur'ān and Sunnah. Instead what he was against is dhikr in unison i.e people sitting together and reciting and praising Allah's name together in one voice. This according to him was bida' and not the dhikr itself. So according to Ibn Taymiyyah if people get together inorder to remember Allah i.e dhikr its fine as long as they dont start doing this in unison in one voice. He (Ibn Taymiyyah) will call this bida' because it wasn't established from Qur'ān and Sunnah and neither the first three generations....
What a good video! Also when the letter 'b' comes after a 'n', the 'n' morphs into a 'm' sound- for ease of pronunciation. E.g, Hanbali turns into Hambali. Also in the Qur'an; 'min ba'di' morphs into ' mim ba'di', meaning..after...
This is false. This is only in tajweed of Quran and does not reflect outside of the quran so hanbali is correct
@@user-ux3wv3rz1d regardless, isn't it easier to say the 'm' sound though?
@@user-ux3wv3rz1d I'm not saying you have to, but just for ease
@@re_patel no because it would be changing his name. This a common mistake and I asked one of the students of knowledge studying hanbali fiqh in Medina he informed me that ita not correct in the Arabic language and that this is only from the tajweed rulings when reciting Quran.
@@user-ux3wv3rz1d ok
great and much needed video
Excellent work thanks for this video
What an amazing video!!!! U explain all these arguments in such simple terms and so non judgmentallyit amazing!!!! Just shows ur academic excellence.💖.
Well, when I explain things I would not act is if there is an "Islamic terrorism". But 'Let's talk Religion" felt the need to repeat this narrative. In my opinion it is normal that people defend themselves when attacked - also in Muslim lands. "But we need to explain jihadist movements!" Yes, on one unimportant page and not in a negative way.
It's always good to understand why people turn to violence and murder as a righteous cause because it's being done to them.
Well done on the video mate!
Great explanation, your knowledge of Islam is very vast.
Thank you, brother. Very interesting and informative video. It is puzzling to balance his rather Puritan attitude towards the interpretation of textual sources and personal ijtihad with his aggressive theology, that is closer to anthropomorphism than not. I think this is why most of the Salafi schools now completely drop the kalam/theology arguments, and focus on the importance of worship and its detailed technicalities.
Thank you for bringing this information to us Philip it's clear that Ibn Taymiyya's ideology is still very influential and I think us understanding this will go one step towards a greater understanding of the issues it has led to and the fact that Islam, like all religions is no monolithic edifice, it contains just as much diversity of thought as all of humanity itself..
Ibn Tamiya is a cursed pig
@@husshuss2652 maybe you give him your good deeds and take his sins for your lies as hadith bankrupt says!
I think the word Monolithic in itself is deeply problematic and so subjective in this context that is becomes moot. Honestly, Islam is pretty monolithic when contrasted against other faiths. WHat I think is happening here is people outside of Islam watch this channel without a real-world sense of how nuanced Islam is beyond an academic discussion. By discussing these details it may seem more "non-monolithic " than it actually is. Monolithic is not always a negative. But depends on what we are discussing and from whose perspective. Still if you come to South Africa or Kenya or Ethiopia, a mosque is a mosque and the religion is pretty clear cut. Ramadan is Ramadan where ever you go.
@@husshuss2652 i‘m a Sufi. But i still love and respect THE GREAT ibn Taymiyyah, he was a great Scholar you have to respect
@@husshuss2652 Allah will punish you
Thanks again for sharing :) - Wonder if you been looking into Ertugrul with the hit show and be great to see what historic information can be found.
Absolutely great video. Keep up the good work🙂
Thank you so much for sharing this figure. Such a comprehensive video! Indeed, it is difficult to consider Ibn Taymiyya a Sufi, because usually academics categorise a Sufi into two schools, either "Tasawwuf Sunni" or "Tasawwuf Falsafi". However, Ibn Taymiyya himself in fact cannot be classified into these two schools of Sufism. Fazlur Rahman felt the need to make up a new typology to cover Ibn Taymiyya's Sufism style outside of Sunni Sufism and Falsafi Sufism. This typology is termed neo-Sufism by him. The views of Ibn Taymīyah and his loyal disciple, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, are then classified as neo-Sufism. These two classical figures are considered by him the pioneers of neo-Sufism; a Sufism school characterised by a great emphasis on moral motives and the application of the methods of remembrance and muraqabah to God. In contrast to Rahman, several academics such as Mustafa Hilmi and 'Abd al-Qadir Mahmud categorise the position of Ibn Taymiyya's Sufism outside the typology of Sunni Sufism and Falsafi Sufism as well as neo-sufism, that is "Salafi Sufism" (al-Tasawwuf al-Salafi). This typology is considered in line with the model of Salafism of Ibn Taymiyya.
he is successful in uncovering the disgrace of sufism in many of his works. The name tasawwuf itself was considered heretical because not a product of the prophet and his companions or the tabiin. How could he be considered a Sufi if the name itself was rejected by him.
I think he just criticized the extreme sufis, despite many, but not all of them...
@@alturatsalturats9691 You shouldn't project the present onto the past. He was not anti-Sufi and I even read a 14th (iirc) century Islamic book about many Muslim Awliya' that referred to him as a Sufi. Most modern-day Sufis would agree with a lot of his critiques of popular sufism practiced by lay people. Let's not create divides where they don't exist.
@Qizilbash Salafiyah isn't a thing to begin with, the meaning of Salafiyah is the return to the pure islamic teaching of the Quran and prophet without whatever Sufi's scholars innovations
@Qizilbash @Qizilbash but it is a historical fact based on the hadith: "the best people are those living in my generation, and then those who will follow them, and then those who will follow the latter." Inevitably the name Salafiyah was literally not known but as a factual history it is not merely "a name".
Many make the mistake of comparing "Salafism" with Protestantism. The "message" might be the same, but the application and the resources are very much different. Also, the main divide here is between the Salafists and the Asharite/Maturidites. Shiites are not included in the picture, as they're a completely different breed of Islam and are considered extreme heretics by both Salafists and Asharites (excluding extreme sufis, who share many of Shiites traditions hence they consider Salafists enemies by nature). The message is clear and simple. We have clear and unambiguous instruction from our Prophet peace be upon him, the companions, and all Imams that follows from the first three generations, that whoever and whatever innovations, big or small, that is introduced into the religion (Islam), is rejected. This leads to the major division between Salafists and Asharites, is that Asharites, very much later after the Prophet's death (peace be upon him), they went into explaining Allah's nature and attributes in a manner that is extremely new and innovative, bringing in western philosophies and sciences in order to substantiate their beliefs (with good intention ofcourse). Again, I have to stress the point that the divide between the Salafis and the Ashartes is not as extreme, not even mildly close, as the divide between Sunnis in general and Shiites. This is proven by the adoption of knowledge between Salafis and Asharites, where (majority of) Asharites consider Ibn Taymiyyah as a great scholar (with mistakes), whereas Shias consider him the number 1 heretic and enemy of their religion.
Feeling honoured to be the first one to comment! Love your channel Mr. Fillip. :)
Accidentally added the video to a few playlists even though it is technically not out yet! Hope you liked it nonetheless! 🙂
@@LetsTalkReligion Always! :)
Hahaha thanks for doing this topic! the Muslim Oliver cromwell! I remember I requested it 😁
Actually i can argue three things that were said in this amazing video: 1. His "harsh" fatwa against alawits and duruz, it was not an unique fatwa of his own, and this fatwa had a political side in the context of thier negative role in the ongoing conficts that time, and this fatwa got very influent and popular because it came from such an important influent scholar/fighter and made him more popular. 2. His fatwa against mongols, again there was a historical and political context, when mongols invading the heart of the islamic empire and some of muslims were having second thoughts defending themselves against the invaders because some of them declared themselves muslims, so ibn teymiyye said that even if some of them believe in some islamic ideas and believes, they still should be fought back. 3. The views againt "taklid" that were mentioned in the video seems like the anti-taklid school in the 20th century, not ibn teymiyye's view himself, he always had been a hanbali scholar, but felt himself free to go beyond his hanbali school when he found it right, and had the courage to do it alot of times but in the frame of hanbali school, the nowadays school of salafis (or most of them) do not look to this that way, and some of them went too extreme in baning "taklid" completely
And i want to add something i believe in, ibn teymiyye's school influents a lot of movements nowadays (wahabis, salafis, isis, etc) but you can rarely find a scholar nowadays that follows ibn teymiyye's school from a to z, most of them are just following his theologic thoughts (regarding god's attributes). for example, he was totally against saint graves visiting, but when wahhabi movement started its war against sufi movements in hijaz area, ibn teymiyye's words was just used to justify the war, even if ibn teymiyye himself didnt mentioned a word about starting a war againt this graves! The same happend with al-qaida and takfir movements in general, i realy admire ibn teymiyye's work and message in his era, i believe he was a genius, and i realy get sad when i see movements using his name and writings to justify or support thier own thoughts and actions
Great points! He should have mentioned the historical context for these fatwas instead of just making him out as some crazy secterian warmongeror. The alawis he takfired were people that used to attack the settlements of sunni Muslims, hence the harshness and permisibility to kill them.
@@muhammedmemduhoglu7854 isis came from al queda who the Saudis booted but cia 79 iran the original jet bombers took them in following shi'a st. fayruz who took Umar then his own life. view : *Saudi Arabian Foreign Minister Rips Apart The Raafidhi MaJEWsi Iranian Foreign Minister *
@@muhammedmemduhoglu7854 truth is ibn Abd. Wahab defended as the Sahabas didn't go to graves for prayer and hadiths said lower graves as high graves lead to polytheism and creation worship which is wrong. Look at Nasir al Hanbali community pages on Saudi vs. Ottomon graves with hadith citations!
Wahdat al Wujud is from the Prophet AS directly from the Muwatta when he (SAWS) said "Do not curse time, for Allah is Time" (ktab al kalam, 3rd Hadith first page) Imam an Nawawi said its a metaphor to explain that Allah swt's Will is behind the unravelling of Time. Since Allah Will is behind everything, the statement "Allah is everything" holds the same weight as the Prophet AS statement that "Allah is time". So Wahdat al Wujud is from the Sunnah directly. What do you make of this argument? Maybe the peer pressure would be too much if you ended up agreeing lol but I still want to hear your thoughts about it
Although many Muslim with disagree with this man and many will agree with this personality. Thank you for the upload.
But is God happy?
Excellent! Thank you 🙏
very thorough study, and informative program
Ibn Taymiyyah was based, not saying I agree with all his views, but the man knew how to hold his own.
it seems to me that radical protestant ideas permeated islam in 18th century, and that the clerics at the time searched for some kind of person in the history of islam which held similar views to name it their predecessor. Ibn Taymiyya got that honor.
I think you are 100% correct
I'll mostly agree. I also think there is also some correlation between ibn Taymiyyah living in a post caliphate society and the fact that the salafi movement really took off after the abolition of the Ottoman (caliphate)
@@emZee1994 they are very different, protestants have their own bible... where as Quran is preserved, so Salafis are a true revival... also liberals can be very strict look at marxism in a moral vacum balance it key!
It's the opposite, salafis are most peaceful and shias are the scorned ones. Turkey in early 1900s was plagued by cultural tasawuf which lead to secularism. Jordan wanted to keep Arabic and rebelled with uk backing, but Jordan lost to Saudis who united Arabia on 1920s.
Saudi formed in 1925 & to 1980 no terror except tel aviv, why? In 73 Saudis & Egypt beat tel aviv for sinai, cia backed iran in 79 to be israelis ally. Iran follow she'a fayruz 1st suicide kariji who knifed Umar then self. Saudi booted al queda, This inspired iran to be original jet bombers, & take in al queda, lie on iraq wmds and leave arms for isil to Aid Assads tyranny.
👏 Congrats, great works....
Very informative 👌🏻
thank you for your informative and beneficial videos , I would really like if you could make videos about the four primary school of sunni islam and represent the similarities and diffrences like comparsion to help us understanding them very well ,thank you!
you are asking a kafir to teach your your Deen? by the way, are you even aware of the level and gravity of mistakes, misinformations and misinterpretions in his videos on anything related to Islam?
@@bana5819 where did she state that she's muslim? You attacked her based on an assumption.
Great work I really loved your objective on this topic. Btw its really beautiful to see Muslim (at least sounds like:)) names between your patrons
Much appreciated effort
It's fascinating how much Ibn Taymiyyah parallels Martin Luther. I was already somewhat familiar with Ibn Taymiyyah, but this time around it hit me that what he's advocating for is remarkably similar to (though definitely not the same as) Luther's principles of sola fide and sola scriptura.
Why do you like isis.
For the same reason you think the Eiffel Tower is a conspiracy concocted in 1473 by Bigfoot, Nixon, and a cabal of Armenian cheese industry moguls. In short, I don’t.
Actually the muslim version of Martin Luther would be Ibn Abdulawahab
@@Dhoom1981 I can certainly see an argument for that. It would depend a bit on what you think the defining significance of Martin Luther is in Christian history. These kinds of comparisons only go so far.
@@Salsmachev Simply because - as stated in the video - for both Martin Luther and Abdel Wahab, their legacy was achieved during their lifetime, unlike Ibn Taymiyyah, whose influence began long after his death.
The hanbali mazhab was actually not the strictest, Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal usually gave multiple rulings for issues because he believed in the leniency of Islam. The strictest mazhab is generally considered to be Hanafi.
I think what he meant was strictest in its methodology brother, hope it helps
Do you have a source on him believing in the leniency of Islam?
Atharee creed basically. Strictly keeping in line with Qur'an and Sunnah and avoiding opinions in the absence of scriptural references.
Nope. the most lenient and has room for the thought and even sufism to express itself is the hanafi. It goes like this Hanafi>shafi'i>Maliki>Hanbali from most lenient to the most extreme
You have never studied fiqh to say this
Very well analysed development of Ibnu Tammiya’s views.
Great informative and interesting video.
Long-awaited episode! I did a presentation on Ibn Taymiyya and his understanding of Theodicy a couple of months ago. His actual life and teaching is certainly more nuanced than the popular caricature and whether you agree with his worldview or specific ideas or not, one has to admit his great importance as a Muslim theologian, maybe second only to Al-Ghazālī
Search Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, also a great theologian, the best imo because he had some kind of honesty that was rare in those times. Al-Razi basically came to the conclusion that the mind (or logic) can only go so far in understanding the world (and God), I think Ibn Taymiyya built on his achievements. Also, I think Al-Ghazālī isn't the brightest of muslim theologians, he's just famous in western circles because William Lane Craig popularized him.
@@eladdad why do you think that Al-Ghazali is not the brightest in your opinion? If not him then who do you think is?
@@strangeair3917 I haven't seen any interesting ideas Al-Ghazali had to offer (in theology/philosophy), he was mostly traditional and I don't usually hear his name when listening to discussions about islamic philosophy. I would pick Al-Razi as the best theologian I know of, he discusses philosophical issues in a skeptic way unlike any of his contemporaries. Ibn Taymyya is also a genius, but I'm still trying to understand his world view.
@@eladdad Al-Ghazali was so influential in his time that he even indirect caused the Almohad dynasty to reise to power in the west.
@@claudiotavares9580 I'm not disputing his influence but his theological/philosophical output compared to Al-Razi or Ibn Taymyya
This is the real authentic straightforward Islam fellow. Unlike those philosophies.
That was so beautiful detailed version of Ibn e Temiyah
Very interesting channel you cover all aspects
Great work! I think I can add one point: Ibn Taymiyya's harsh fatwas on shia in general were motivated by politics, The mongol illkhanate accepted islam and favoured Shia ideology over sunni ideology, that meant Muslims in levant had to fight invading MUSLIM mongols. That made the notion to fight mongols back less popular,as they already had an overwhelming power in addition to their cruelty, and fact that mongols accepted islam made it even more complicated. In fact Ibn taymiyya's most popular book( Minjah Al sunna Al nabawiyya) is a response to a book called ( Minhaj Al Karama fi Ithbat Al Imamah) written by Ibn Mutahhar Al Hilli who was the head of Shia scholars during his lifetime(first to be given the title Ayatollah), Ibn Al Mutahhar himself was a student of Nasir Aldin Al Tusi, A prominent Shia scholar, who was an advisor to the infamous Hulagu Khan. It's accepted among Sunnis and Shia today that Ibn Al Mutahhar was the reason Mongol illkhanate officials favoured Shia doctrine over its Sunni counterpart. So in my own personal opinion: Ibn Taymiyya viewed Shia as an enemy that was trying to undermine the Muslim world. He never viewed them as Muslims with different views. Same goes to other Shia minorities: alawites and duruz: he accused (in his fatwa) these minorities of siding and aiding mongols and crusaders. In short: Ibn Taymiyya and his critique of Shia and their beliefs were the result of Muslim-Mongol conflict
His critiques of shias is because of their beliefs which are totally against Quran
Another made up story by a shia 😂😂 just like all other stories of shias
@@zeeshanbhat6862This is what people don't want to accept and they bring all sorts of other reasons
great neutral reporting on this great figure
Wow your pronunciation of Arabic words is amazing
Did anyone else get unsubscribed to this channel? I have around 300 subscriptions and this channel is like one of my top 5 favorites and never had I unsubscribed to it, yet I just had to subscribe again.
He was in the way. Plain and simple. You can’t have peace with a person like him around.
What library is the book you authored on establishing peace, stored in? Happy to buy. An Amazon link might be better if you have that on hand.
@@obaid5761 mocking someone for their statement instead of bringing a legitimate counter statement to encourage discussion speaks volumes. Be better. You have every right to disagree, mockery isn't the way to do so.
Was mid mental breakdown and got video notification. All smiles now.
An unbiased overview of Ibn Taymiyyah. Thank you.
He was seriously biased
@@Omer1996E.C 100%
Thank you sir.❤️
a lot of people claim the aqeedah of Ibn Taymiyyah are the one's of the pious predecessors, even though its creed is not in line with the predecessors, as it emphasizes many ambiguous ayats of the Qur'an literally, whereas the default Athari position was a form of unreflective traditionalism, where you don't ask anything and leave the meaning to god. the Ash'ari and Maturidi do tafwidh, but they add up a meaning to find the hikma behind the ayat, while at the same time knowing that the true meaning is left to Allah. I really hope this makes people understand the difference. nonetheless, great video, there are some errors in the "Bi la Kayf" of Ibn Taymiyyah, as he imposes the modality of mutashabihat ayats, but a lot of them are pretty descriptive.
I don't know what ibn taymiyyah wrote but atharis do not take make anthropomorphic interpretations.
@@ishxyzaak depends of what strand of athari we're talking about here, the true athari (which lives on through Ibn Qudamah) creed is the creed of the shahaba, which is not anthropomorphic at all, whereas those who follow the modern salafi creed and claim to be athari is unfortunately slightly anthropomorphic.
@@ishxyzaak from my experience they ("Salafis" in particular) generally hold an anthropomorphic stance, as they take mentions of the "face" or "hands" or such of God to be literal. So they say God has a face and hands and legs but unlike those of humans. Mainstream Sunnis (Ash'ari and Maturidi) have usually held these as descriptive metaphors.
I think the Ashaari creed has been shaped by politics in a way to serve as an official state relgion. There are many similarities between it and the Christian orthodoxy, from which the Ashaarism has borrowed the "Divine right" among many other political feature. That was not possible without some theological resemblance too. We know that al-Kalam (Ashaari theology system) is mainly inspired by the Christology which is based on Aristotle syllogism. In a time when Aristotle was veneered either by the Church or by the Muslim erudits as well,Ibn Taymiyyah compiled one of the earliest critique studies to Aristotle to prove Aristole was wrong, just to serve his endeavor to refute Ashaarism, which opened the path for later ones such as Francis Bacon and René Descartes against the Catholic Church.
@@HamzaBaqoushi Plato was way more influential between sunni erudits that Aristotle in the middle ages.
You should make a video about the history of Wahhabism and the horrors it has unleashed upon the world. The numbers of tombs of saints and family members of the prophet that they destroyed. They had the audacity to try to destroy the tomb of Muhammad himself!
kzhead.info/sun/qs-wcrh-ZGlnYKM/bejne.html
The horrors is Islamic terrorism is well know to the world lol
ibn Abdul Wahab actually defended himself and followed the hadith of lowering graves which Ali narrated, so he wasnt bad, its just the grave worshipers who don't know Islam teaches to pray to Allah alone were upset. Go to Nasir al Hanbali's page!
Islam is to worship ALLAH not tombs, this bidʻah was introduced many centuries after the death of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and was not known at the beginning of Islam
Wahhabi sack of Karbala for example
Hi, Good Job to cover such crucial topics. Please also make episode on Allama Iqbal, Maulana Maududi. Hasan Al Banna Shaheed
May Allah have mercy on Shaykhul Islam Ibn Taymiah Rahimahullah for his balanced understanding of Islamic creed and straunch opposition to religious innovations and saint and grave worshipping.
And he "corrected" God and his prophet, 700 years after the last revelation. Just created a religion based on his taste and (mis) understanding of actual Islam.
Ibn taymiyah was a teacher who defeated the mongols
16:57 It is not to ibn Taymiyyah that all forms of innovations are wrong rather it is sahih hadith in Sunan an Nasāi' which is as: It was narrated that Jabir bin 'Abdullah(رضى الله عنه) said: "In his Khutbah the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to praise Allah as He deserves to be praised, then he would say: 'Whomsoever Allah (سبحان وتعالى) guides, none can lead him astray, and whomsoever Allah sends astray, none can guide. The truest of word is the Book of Allah and best of guidance is the guidance of Muhammad. The worst of things are those that are newly invented; every newly-invented thing is an *Innovation* and *every innovation* is going *astray* , and every going *astray is in the Fire* .'....." Sunan an-Nasa'i, 1578 In-Book Reference: Book 19, Hadith 23
Well said
May Allah guide you. You’re intelligent.
can u make a video about al-qarafi and his approach to the limitation of the state? Peace from Germany
Thank you for a great video. I do believe that many non Muslim scholars come to Ibn Taymiyyah with a tainted view because of biases against modern Islamic movements. Also a note that yusef al qardawi is still alive. The last quote indicated he died in 1926, that's probably his birth year. Thanks again for a great video.
ibn Taymiyya (rh) was awesome
He is a reckles man, see his wtiting its mesy
He was godfather of terrorists