If you'd like to learn more about quantum mechanics, use our link brilliant.org/sabine - You can get started for free, and the first 200 will get 20% off the annual premium subscription.
Correction to what I say at 14:22 -- The KATRIN experiment does not look for neutrinoless double beta decay, it's trying to measure the absolute neutrino masses. There are several other experiments looking for neutrinoless double beta decay. Sorry about that mixup!
Some physicists are claiming that there is something "wrong" with our understanding of the universe. Oftentimes, it's just to justify asking for funding for new experiments, a better detector, a new telescope, a bigger collider, but what if there's something more than that? Do we have evidence of new physics? Or not? In this video, we will look at dark matter and dark energy, quantum gravity, the mass of the Higgs-boson, neutrino masses, and the matter-antimatter asymmetry.
💌 Support us on Donatebox ➜ donorbox.org/swtg
🤓 Transcripts and written news on Substack ➜ sciencewtg.substack.com/
👉 Transcript with links to references on Patreon ➜ / sabine
📩 Sign up for my weekly science newsletter. It's free! ➜ sabinehossenfelder.com/newsle...
👂 Now also on Spotify ➜ open.spotify.com/show/0MkNfXl...
🔗 Join this channel to get access to perks ➜
/ @sabinehossenfelder
🖼️ On instagram ➜ / sciencewtg
00:00 Introduction
00:40 Confused Physicists
3:03 The Mass of the Higgs-Boson
6:47 Quantum Gravity
9:18 Dark Matter and Dark Energy
12:21 Neutrino Masses
15:36 Antimatter
17:13 Summary
18:15 Brilliant Sponsorship
#science #physics
Correction to what I say at 14:22 -- The KATRIN experiment does not look for neutrinoless double beta decay, it's trying to measure absolute neutrino masses. There are several other experiments looking for neutrinoless double beta decay. Sorry about that mixup!
You can also add the correction as text to your video that pops up at the correct moment (I have seen others do that) 🙂
You should pin this comment. Edit: she did so now 👍
Right-handed neutrinos could behave like living beings if they are stable neutrinos with a lot of neutral qualities.
@@smlanka4u Indeed, but only if they are in orbit around uranus.
Does this mean that the telephone rang?
actually just the science of obtaining new funding
I’ll take, should be a grad school requirement for 2,000
Thanks, I hate it.
I'm sad now
Sad but true!
No different than anyone else in a job or field.
When in doubt, always remember the most fundamental rule: "People will lie for money."
Sabine's sense of humour is really subtle but it's a force of nature.
...and much like forces of nature, her flood of logic is at times, over intellectually small minded heads; flat earthers and climate deniers come to mind at first...
It's part of what I love about her, her humour requires attention and understanding to notice
WHat about all those socks that disappaer from the washing machines? Happens everythere, all over the planet. No trace. Socks never shows up radomly, only disappear. It also seems physically impossible that two socks from the same pair disappear at the same time; if two socks are missing at the same time, they are _always_ from two dirrefent paris. No exceptions. We need to build a lot of big and expencive machines to fighure this out. The theorists have no answers even, so experiments is the only way forward.
Interesting video, thanks! I have two things to point out: 1) Experimental particle physics doesn't just consist of high energy collider physics. Many other, smaller experiments exist and deserve funding IMO. I'm sure Sabine is aware, I was just missing the broader perspective in the video. 2) KATRIN measures the absolute neutrino mass (effective mass of the electron antineutrino). Neutrinoless double beta decay is searched at other experiments. E.g. GERDA, KamLAND-Zen, and in the near future LEGEND.
Ugh, dang, I mixed up those German names, thanks for pointing out!
@SabineHossenfelder if I had a spare 10 billion dollars for research, and you got to decide what to do with it, what would you spend it on?
@@FrankWinchestermanufacturing LK-99
@@FrankWinchester I can't (and won't!) answer for Sabine, but me? I'd make sure every human child had decent educational, food, and health provisions. A very great deal of good, including good science, would be the result. Not to mention happier kids, worth their weight in gold.
@@davidwright8432That amount of money wouldn't cover a small city for an experiment, not to mention the huge bucks the directors will skim.
Lots of really salty CERN employees in the comments section.🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I want to thank you for asking the tough questions Sabine, and for pointing out the inconvenient truths. You do this in all of your videos, and it is not an easy thing to do. It takes real courage. But in doing so, you are helping me, and countless others like me, learn the importance of critical thinking. Not just in physics, but in all areas of inquiry. I am always learning from you Sabine, and for that I am truly grateful. 🙏
@@repentandbelieveinJesusChrist1 not sure how that is supposed to relate to OPs comment. But anyhow, no thanks, one more reason better not doing any "repenting" to that ominous "he who" - am not particularly interested in becoming a zombie like this J character.
Approx 11:10 The "car keys" analogy. Brilliant! Sabine is *so* direct. I love it!
The analogy might be more relatable to those whose comprehension of physics is derived solely from KZhead videos...
@@michaelking8391bingo. If you're not narrowing theory space, then physicists are just telling stories.
Gotta love the scientific commentary of Sabine while at 5:39 a dude looks at a super complex series of equations and thoughtfully adds a "+2"
"Now the model fits."
it really b like that tho
Or maybe he just hadn't yet finished writing the known equation.
@@Houshalter that is literally how Planck came up with Quantum Mechanics, making a model that fit. And he was right.
@@briansammond7801Plancks constant formulation is wrong
LOL the heat death of the universe gag got me. That was actually very very funny. I now remember her doing something like that in a previous video, too. Well done!
This video reminded me of the following quote: "Everyone wants to serve what they first get - money, work, profession, talent - and they have a principle of looking at the world in such a way to get the salary next month. We don't live on money, we live on lies". Hamvas Béla
Great quote, indeed
I guess today's takeaway is that we should skip the next collider and instead build the one after that?
Yes. I could well be that we need colliders 10,000 times more powerful than today, however, we won't be able to afford this anytime soon.
@@davidbrisbane7206 : Sabine should ask Elon to donate, next time he phones.
🤣 yes
Ah.… when desire collides with reality
That's what irks me about Sabine's dismissiveness here. She doesn't suggest any criteria for when we _should_ build a new collider, much less lay out a path for getting there without the incremental progress of building better colliders.
As I oscillate between watching “Launch Pad Astronomy” videos and Sabine’s videos, my brain oscillates between “Oh,.. I think I’m beginning to understand” and “Way above my head, but at least I have a better chance of BS-ing my way through at the next cocktail party”.
Same, I watch these videos so I could be more interesting in parties
@@rickv9180 After a few of them, you'll begin to understand
@@rickv9180you’re going to the wrong parties 😂
The Newton Constant G also Oscillates as it is slowly decreasing as we cycle through to a different part of the Milky Way Orion Arm! Newton's "G" is dropping because Ambient EM Field Density in Vacuum is Dropping! SO THE MOON IS MOVING AWAY FROM THE EARTH AND THE EARTH IS ALSO MOVING AWAY FROM THE SUN FOR THE SAME REASON! The Constants cycle back every 130,000 - 200,000 and is the major force function of LARGE GLACIER ICE AGES! We are due for one in 10,000-50,000 years! kzhead.info/sun/jMuqXaiDaKJnan0/bejne.html
Science seems to be less and less about truth and more and more about those cocktail parties.
Thanks for the well thought out and informative video Sabine
I may be weird but I think this is the not only the best physics channel on KZhead but also the funniest. Sabine talks about science in a way I can understand and her jokes make me laugh out loud. Who can make physics funny? Now you know.
And easy the most honest channel, even when she has to deliver at gunpoints, Sabine escapes quite elegant.
she is bad, she work for elite, she lied way to much, she was lying also for earth and many more things, for me it takes 2 sec to understand faces, she work for elite, lie as hell, manipulation work,, nothing more, think about this, she knows nothing but anything she talk about is that what she read before make a video.. we call email work, because she is not talking as she know things, she talk only on the way the boss want her to talk
Not the best. Not even close to the funniest. Best among all is russian channel "Ali". Something truly OUTSTANDING. Best in English is "PBS Space Time". Not to be rude, but this chanel is stupid and toxic in some places. I can't remember the name of another russian granma making just the same as Sabine without any hypocrisy and with a ton of humor and deliverance, while in Sabine's field the good'ol Neil Tyson handles all this much better.
This is the level of snark that first brought me to Sabine's channel. It's good to see that it's back!
click-bait title though
So it is not a snark, it is a boozom
I don't think it is snark, I think she is on the 'spectrum'. She has zero filter relating to people's emotions or feelings. I don't think she is snarky, just 100% cold, hard facts. She just as easily points out when she herself has made mistakes recently. She kinda reminds me of Spock. But that is just my speculation.
@@aquafyre- You can't do hyphens like that or it does a -strikethru- I think you need --double-- or a - space - EDIT. Ok, double don't work, but a space did.
I was just about to write the same, when I saw this comment.
I took an interest in mond in school and one of the reasons that I kind of got burnt out was because that alienated me from everybody. And I didn't have the social wherewithal to know that that was happening until pretty late into the game. I had a couple professors I think we're trying to be supportive essentially, but I would have needed a lot of help knowing how to map out what I should do after my masters and do the right things before i finished, and I was too introverted and uncomfortable to force the issue, so eventually I ran myself into a corner, covid happened, and i dropped out.
damn this is a shame. Scientists really seem to enjoy being able to be patronizing or demeaning to people who investigate ideas that they don't think are worth it. I'm sorry you had that experience, there are a lot of respectable people who think MOND is a valid area of research. I hope you get back into physics, which university were you attending?
This social alienation is seen not only in physics. Pretty harmful for science and I'm not really sure on how to deal with it, except for swimming with the masses ... which is kind of pointless, if one wants to find out *new* things.
Huge shame. Hindsight is 20/20, but it might have been easier if you were studying under physicists who currently research MOND. I didn't do any research like that before I picked a school, either, it was all practical concerns for me. What I have to tell you is that if you retain any interest in physics, if this experience has not sucked all of the joy out of it, you should get back in the game *right now.* Trust me when I tell you that the longer you wait, the harder it will be. 3 years is not too long, not by a long shot. You're probably not even 30. You're nearing or at your intellectual peak. If you don't use this gift while you have it, you will regret it forever.
I'm very sorry to hear that. These things really shouldn't happen, but I know from personal experience that it can be difficult to find a supervisor who shares your interests and if you don't find one, things get very difficult.
Hi, try super-fluid dark matter,(condensed matter physics) if i understand acording to Sabine its great chances to explain dark-matter. ....all the best.
Love your videos. I would really like you to do one on experiments we could do rather than ones we shouldn't. Where would you like the research funds spent?
Send a probe out of the solar system to check MOND? would take a few decades and I am not sure about the speed it should have to do the experiments. But better than to look for Dark Matter at CERN.
"Never ask a barber if you need a haircut" = "Particle physcis departments ALWAYS want a bigger collider"
My favourite new channel. I don't pretend to understand 90% of what Sabine covers, but her humour easily makes up for that 90%.
I think you'll find that it's 91.3267115% 🙂
@@daveseddon5227 😂
Well, thats the nice part about Science, nothing is stopping you from making that 90 into an 89!
Dont worry about that. I have an actual masters in plasma physics and my understanding is still very limited.
Really, does anyone actually like the phone bits?
Thank you for your videos, as a highschooler who wants to pursue physics, it can make me aware of current physics to an extent without needing to fully understand postgraduate physics
Hi Sabrina, love your channel, always wondered about this question : Is there a particle for time?
No,time is either emergent concept in particle physics or spacetime in general relativity (and there is no particle of space)
Sabine your work is amazing as well as your degree in physics but I think you are pretty down to earth looking. There is always room for new theories especially when the standard model does not resolve all the physics problems...
I always like to listen to Sabine’s rambling about issues I know jack about 😊
Nice video, although I don't think that Cold Dark Matter (as opposed to Modified Gravity) is a mere preference by particle physicists to get a bigger collider. After all Cold Dark Matter is regarded as more likely also by cosmologists and some of the problems with it (cusp core, missing satellites) have recently become less problematic as simulations improved.
They need more research into field forces. For example, a physically moving electrostatic charge creates a time field. And it sure looks like gravity is caused by a gradient in the time field. You can set this up in your living room for almost no money (and I have). The particles are distracting, but field forces will prove to be more useful with advancing technology.
She is so out of loop with particle physics that she doenst even know that the particle physics community wants the next collider to be a Higgs factory and not a collider to study dark matter.
Thank you for explaining the difference between Math and Physics -- It took me 2 decades to figure that "subtle" difference
Your awesome, can't wait for your next showing. Simply the best explanations anyone could possibly find. Cheers Aussie James Kuffner.
I think we need a debate Sabine... You and someone from particle physics (?) as brilliant and assertive as you. For non-experts, watching videos without the chance of inquiring further (or with the kinda podcast interviewers we have, mostly horrible), the subject is always only treated (obviously) to the limit of what the speaker wants to share. Even if we have the right questions in our minds, we can't ask them and even researching about them are usually out of our depth. Cheers!!! :)
I found my keys in the freezer once. So now I always check the freezer just in case.
Hopefully you don't have to pay 10 billion dollars each time 😅
Another amazing episode. Still, by far, the most informative science source on the web apart from reading the actual papers.
Hi, I was wondering if the anomalies from the g-2 experiment requires new physics. I would love to hear your thoughts specifically as the way you put this video puts everything in physics into perspective.
looking forward to what she says. but i'm expecting the most likely reason for the anomaly is that it's not completely understood how to derive g from the standard model, and there's nothing wrong with the standard model. but it's much more interesting if SM is wrong, so that's all you hear about lately
There is already video explaining possibilities of g-2 experiment in this channel
Lol, Chico Buarque meme at a Sabine Hossenfelder video (laughing and serious guy meme is an album cover from Chico Buarque, late 60s I think) She should use also the math lady meme, from a Brazilian soap opera, featuring Renata Sorrah
It has been said that it is very difficult to convince someone of something if their income is dependent on them disagreeing.
I guess most scientists could easily find a better paying job if they want to. Working in particle physics is something that you do out of passion
I just started reading Carlo Rovelli’s Helgoland, and they’re talking about this exact thing re: Heisenberg’s table of observable measurements and electron orbits. I was thinking this was gonna lead up to a 3 Body Problem type issue. This info is putting a whole new interesting spin on the reading!
Electrons don't have orbits. NEXT! :-)
The funding part regarding colliders reminds me of quantum computers, they have to find new ways to attract investment. With quantum computers they casually mentioned it could potentially be used to break encryption and suddenly the funding was there.
I love how you can just casually explain away blackhole horizon vs singularity with such ease. I would pay for an AI personality version of you teaching me everything.
It's because she is ignoring decades of research _after_ Schwarzchild. People on the fringes of science often cite the "gods" of science from long ago rather than more recent and widely-adopted views, similar to extreme conservatives who ignore a lot of modern society bc they wish the founding fathers were their real daddy. 😜
AIs use too much energy which will make Elon Musk angry.
@@gerbre1 I think Elon is already angry about too much stuff already.
@@CAThompson "No, dad, it doesnt make my website look like a p rn website!" I swear Elon gets worse every year lol
Is physics right now really this exciting or is Sabine such a talented science communicator that this feels as interesting as a Hollywood movie?🥤🍿 Great job! 👏
Yes!
Everything can be exciting as long as you are interested in the subject 😋
@@aidanclarke6106 Great teachers are incredibly important too. :)
considering most recent hollywood movies in the past 10 years are like reheated microwave food, and relaunches, remakes, souless franchised content that is made out of what more creative and talented people made before, this sounds almost like an insult.
I wish I had youtube and these type of channels while i was still in school. Would've definitely sparked an interest in physics, instead of being buried in a book with a monotone teacher.
A concise and understandable breakdown as always. Your video's inspire confidence in your talents :) . I wonder, is there a way to find the threshold between macro and micro. If the slit experiment behaves one way in Quantum world, and 2 marbles thrown into the same experiment act in the Newtonian Physics way why can't we repeat the experiment using bigger 'stuff' from photons to molecules until the threshold of the 2 worlds is found.
This video answered al lot of questions that I had! Thnx Sabine!
Used to have to spend very-hard-earned cash at selected Book-stores to get information like this...now Sabine earlily summarises it for free : THIS is what YT and Social media should be about, instead of all the wanna-be influencers, narcissistic 'selfie-specialists and vitriolic shills. Thanks Sabine, what a credit to international society you are.
💯
Not to German society?
Your channel has helped me understand so much more about physics. It would be interesting to see you have a casual discussion with another physicist to exchange ideas back and forth.
Ms. Sabine is on a few great panel discussion videos. Do a KZhead search.
When i imagine advanced civilizations sometimes i think of them being post E=mc2...they may have spent 100 years or 1,000,000 years being "trapped" in this equation but at the interstellar stage a new equation is found to bring it about...this allows me to accept the realities of how we are kind of stuck in this beautiful equation at the moment
I’ve invented the new equation.
I think mankind will be extinct before we progress beyond e=mc2
Thanks for the great Video, I did my MSc in probing some "Beyond the Standard Model" and you know what, it really took me out of my passion of Physics. I am definitely not doing that again. 🙃 I just don't know what to focus my PhD in yet.
BTW, the guy from the meme (new particles vs modified gravity) is a Brazilian singer called Chico Buarque. 😊
No, it’s Chico Buarque!!!
@@pedroamaral3935 OPS, you're right! 😬
Sabine is so funny she should have her own Netflix special. I just love the humour.
Sabine's not woke enough for Netflix 😂
Why would she limit herself to limited Netflix subscribers. She’s got more audience on KZhead for free
No seriously she has hundreds of meme worthy stuff like I think you should leave
About the antimater. There are theoretical things known as Sphalerons that can change the baryon number. So even if the universe was initially composed of only normal matter then the asymmetry would be washed out before temperature got low enough to stop sphalerons from forming Best way of making sense of those is as using Dirac sea as a Hilbert hotel. By adding some value to the 4 momentum you can create or destroy parties. It is easiest to see it in 1+1d periodic model with a single (massless) parties with only one handness
At this point in the particle physics game I'm going to need some reasonably practical application behind funding a new collider
A bigger collider will prove you wrong, trust me.😂
Sabine, I love you because you are not easily fooled and that you so kindly include us in that set. Imagine the science that could be done with the funds for a larger collider.
Sabine your awesome! Keep up being the reality check of particle physics! Can’t wait for your next video!
You're* awesome
Your analyses are wonderfully logical and understandable.
I like it when you go into depth about new subjects. While I don't dislike the news, others do that too; tho not occasionally with less scientific understanding. I don't have the maths for this kind of physics; but maybe I can get more out of it by going over you arguments that there is no new science to be gained from supercolliders. OTOH, I can't imagine that giving them so huge a chunk of the budget, aids progress in the field. I think you have excellent credentials to call BS on some mainstream or alternative claims, while supporting mainstream models where warranted.
Always love the fact-based, straight-ahead viewpoints from Sabine.
german genes :))
I too always learn by listening to Sabine. However I find many of her conclusions confusing. She says we don't need anymore colliders and yet history shows us that the knowledge we've learned by building colliders is almost overwhelming. There is so much we would not know now if it weren't for colliders. Sabine never acknowledges this, she totally disregards factual history. Sabine is great for explaining current research, but you have to disregard her conclusions.
@@harryseldon362 I think that her argument is along the lines that the past discoveries you are talking about are from Theoretical Physicists developing a model implying that a particle with a certain mass exists and Experimental Physicists go on a search for said particle. She goes on to say that Experimental Physicists are campaigning for colliders to detect particles with higher masses without there being a model implying that any higher mass particles exist. Given the multi-billion dollar cost of building new larger colliders, it is not fiscally prudent to build said collider purely on unsupported speculation.
@@harryseldon362 She's been saying the same things for years, there's nothing to show she's incorrect yet. There's a potent where spending billions of dollars and digging up kilometres of land, and using all those researches to maybe find some new physics things but maybe not is a gross waste that will cause unnecessary environmental damage, and may well become a black hole for funding in the future.
@@CAThompson In certain cultures, individuals who parrot words without true comprehension are likened to parrots, while in others, they are equated with sheep. It is deeply regrettable that, although Sabine maintains objectivity on other subjects, she exhibits strong bias and subjectivity in this instance. Her discourse appears disingenuous, seemingly driven by her personal experiences and disappointments within the field, which she projects onto her videos. Her conclusions lack scientific rigor, though discerning this requires an insider's grasp of the field. Disregarding the role of symmetries in physics equates to disregarding the very foundation of physics spanning the past century or more, and even disregarding the Standard Model itself. Regarding the matter of environmental change, your standpoint comes across as hypocritical in light of the prevailing state of affairs concerning climate, climate change, pollution, political corruption, wars, and exorbitant military budgets, among myriad other concerns.
Sabine truly shines on a topic like this. She has my vote for Empress of Reality Check and Wise Contrarian to Sci-Hype Funding.
Empress of the Reality Check :-)
🗳
@@guest_informant Empress of Reality. 🤷🏻♀️
Ya gotta love Sabine - informing and educating the laymen while pissing of all of acadamia lol.
"there is something wrong with the standard model" is code for we want more funding.
I want to thank you, Ms. Hossenfelder, for giving me wonderful explanations!! I watch these every week, and regularly go back to see them again. Thank you again!!!
Dr* Hossenfelder
Thanks Sabine, for your honest, succinct opinions about your quantum compatriots.
A team from Cornell had proposed in a paper that gravity was part of the EM spectrum. The paper was retracted shortly after but ... many years later, gravity waves are discovered. Is it time to reconsider gravity as part of EM? Would a quantum gravity theory have a problem with that?
your absolute dedication to science always inspires me.
We always want to observe what has not been seen before, even if only to confirm the theory we know and love.
Bingo. Relativity is proven all over again a few times a decade. More confirmation of the current theory is preferable to halting the flow of data and declaring the end of physics.
One phrase comes to mind: Confirmation Bias.
I usually find that two strategically aligned mirrors can show me things I've never seen before.😅
Once again very informative, maybe a little hard on experimental physicists, but very enjoyable. Thanks.
Nah, Experimental Physicists are mostly safe from Sabine's regular tongue-lashing - it's Particle Physicists in general and those whose only argument is "needs more TEVs" in particular that should be worried.
Thank you for this video. You always make physics as simple as it can be---but no simpler.
Outstanding presentation!! I do have one question, as the standard model particles combine accumulate mass and begin to affect spacetime is that the point where the wave function collapses?
wave function seems to collapse by measurement, that´s what Sabine´s current research is about. It´s in her videos about superdeterminism and the current one about non-locality (No Portals?)
Beautifully blunt and factually precise - thank you, Sabine Hossenfelder!
I certainly did not understand a single thing but I am now very confident that she can sell a refrigerator to an Eskimo.
@@janami-dharmam Hmm… that _does_ help explain the five Sabine Hossenfelder Brand refrigerators I now have in my garage… 🧊🥶❄️☃️⛄
It always feels like were on the path to something new and great but somehow keep missing the target.
Yeah they have to seem "new and great" in order to secure their careers and get funding
The alchemists never went away, they just adapted their grift.
Question: Topic, Unified Force. If we were to assign gravity as a function of mass and tie it to the Higgs field as time-space fabric, do the EM/Str/Wk forces as a Unified Force work? Follow-up: If we were to attribute gravity as a function of the Higgs Wave-Fabric, and use LhhL neutrinos, would the additional Higgs readings relate/correlate to the Missing Mass/Dark Matter search? Thank you in advance should you have time to respond.
One correction Dark energy is controversial. Because we aren't even sure whether universe expansion is accelerating or not. As we look for more data with Euclid then we can say for new physics or not
This is the age of space telescopes! JWST is revolutionizing cosmology. However, it would be great for Sabine to give us a list of projects that would give us the greatest expected value from our fundamental physics dollars.
I wonder how many small experiments they could run for the price of the next big collider
Colliders are like space travel. The technologies developed end up in everyday life everywhere.
@@bzuidgeestperhaps, but as the saying goes: if you wanted to invent Teflon, launching a space program isn't the most obvious way to do it!
@@bzuidgeest Much more technologies would be developed and end up in everyday lives for the cost of one huge collider. Do we need a huge rocket right now? no we don't
@@ecoista1373you might need a huge rocket right now, but when you need it, that's not the time to build it either. It's like planting a tree, the best time is now. The knowledge gained will be useful for eternity.
@@bzuidgeest I love science and I'm glad there is the funding for these projects but sometimes I question the scale. The space program is a great analog. Imagine how many probes could be sent with the budget of the new Artemis missions
Chico Buarque at 10:34. Good to know Brazilian memes are alive and kicking even to brilliant minds such as Sabine's.
Always enjoy listening to you. Thanks for your non bias honesty
Even an UNLOADED gun is dangerous near an MRI. When that thing turns on its pull on the gun is so strong it can kill you if you are between the gun and the MRI and near enough. Most of the time the gun is off-center of the one wearing the gun, so it twists the unlucky human around and then forcibly frees itself. Can be costly once that unloaded gun damages the MRI.
Forget a gun. A piercing is dangerous near an MRI.
@@JorgetePanete Yep, corrected.
See if you can find the story of the lady that wore her “100%” silicon buttplug to her MRI scan only to have it sucked into her chest cavity. 😮
Sabine H. is always the most clear "explainer".
Great video, thank you, Sabine 🤗💫
@5:40 someone probably asked this below, but worth repeating: the "quantum fluctuations" might not be strictly measurable directly, but there are indirectly discernible are they not? So I'd not say they are "not real" in the same sense of the black hole singularity being purely a mathematical artefact. It's an apples and oranges comparison. Don't go telling me, "Yeah, both are fruit!"
This was really informative for me - thank you very much!
I learned that the fridge light stays on. I now know all that I need to know.🥴
Quick fact: the guy who died at an MRI exam for having a gun was accompanying his mom and she was doing the exam, he violated the "no metals in the room/body rule" and although he removed the magazine there was still a bullet in the chamber which he didn't remove. The MRI machine unlocked the pistol and pulled the trigger. Ironically, he was also a huge pro-weapons guy, so there's that.
as a gun nut myself i find this tragic for his mother and the staff they didn't deserve to see that and live with it. The guy on the other hand should've known that could have happened. I will never understand some of my fellow gun owners who simultaneously agree guns are extremely dangerous and worth having yet ignore their own basic gun safety. Dumbass got a darwin award for sure.
Oh, now I understand. There's no way the patient wouldn't have been told to leave the metals in the locker.
There is a beauty in realizing personal Second Amendment rights to their limit. While personally, I think they are completely misread by the supreme court.
@@2adamast I couldn't agree more. I think people should have the right to own guns for personal protection and hunting, however, for this to be possible we need a society with better care for mental health and less motivation to commit crimes, through job opportunities, affordable housing, etc.
I would like to see a video that goes into the neutrino mass bit in much more detail. I am not clear on why 2 particles are required to interact with the higgs. If she has a video about this already a link would be appreciated.
There is really an experiment that requires "beyond standard model", that's the X17 vectorial proton "phobic" particle measured in ATOMIKA Hungary with 6 sigmas.
👋 1:31 and 2:30 Ouch!! 😆 You have a way with words, Sabine! 👏 And yes................... SHARED!
You can really see the difference in quality in videos where Sabine is talking about her field and the other videos. I understand there's not enough content to be talking about physics and philosophy of science all the time, but I really enjoy these videos more! For example, the recent video about greenwashing was your typical, slightly click-baity, not much substance video you find everywhere.
There's only a few channels that get into data and the c quality of it as well as more broad information that I've found so far, with the wide range of an topics covered.
@@CAThompson I suspect there are three types of videos in Sabine's channel: videos about physics, which is where she shines, science news videos, which are a nice addition but aren't the reason I follow her, and finally videos about all sorts of themes Sabine doesn't really know much about, and those are the ones I find don't contribute much... But I might be wrong.
her non-physics videos are very useful, just look the last one about ´green-washing´, or sometimes controversal, so they trigger a debate, that's useful too.
@@Thomas-gk42 I'm not saying the theme of the video isn't useful, I'm saying it is well outside her expertise, if I'm watch a video about greenwashing from Sabine versus a video from a youtuber who actually knows about businesses and the corporate world, like Slidebean or someone similar, the difference in quality is obvious. Equally, a finance youtuber would make a pretty useless physics video. There are plenty of videos out there about psychology made by people who actually know psychology, etc. Sabine's take on it is... superficial. Don't get me wrong, I've been watching Sabine's content for a long time and love it, I just don't do the emotional, fan thing. Just because Sabine is a great science communicator in her field doesn't mean I want her or her team of journalists to talk to me about psychology, for example. It's not a big deal anyway, I've learned to stick to the physics related videos and skip the others.
@@goncalovazpinto6261 I find the 'about everything' videos a good introduction to the topics they cover insofar as they cover misconceptions, different explanations & their likelihood, and can provide a starting-point for further researching the topics.
Spreadsheets. That's what comes to my mind when I hear about quantized spacetime. Just think how spreadsheets are updated, especially when they contain circular references. Isn't it nice how the speed limit for information prevents the universe from being unresponsive due to an infinite loop?
I don't understand most of what you're talking about but I'm learning! Thank you!
Recht vielen Dank, Frau Doktor! Ihre Erklaerung ist ganz richtig! 😊
Your videos are always best when you stick to physics. Thanks.
Well said.
Great video. It’s so helpful hearing the bigger picture and exposing some of the bias and different motivations that exist within science.
This is what I've heard about the antimatter problem. if you wind back time by condensing the expanding universe, you'll reach temperatures where particles that comprise matter did not exist. they had to be created by decaying high energy particles like photons. In that case, they'll create equal amounts of matter and antimatter. Is this incorrect?
I ve been watching your videos for a long time. I think you are awfully funny and it s not because of your sarcastic jokes but rather because of your way of rationaly arguing to settle serious arguments in physics. It makes me giggle every time. Thanks.
Something I'd honestly love to see in my lifetime is research into Artificial black holes. I hear all the time with hardcore futurists that there's such a thing as a "naked singularity", which is a singularity outside the event horizon of a black hole. This is, seemingly, completely possible to create, and it would probably be really fascinating to see what this would be like, and what these new observations could mean for physics. However, I am extremely dubious that an experiment like that could ever be done in my lifetime. Artificial black holes are one of those fringe technologies that seem to have all sorts of potential for new science and technology, but, in reality, they are just impractical. I think I could be tided over with seeing experiments involving macroscopic amounts of quantum entangled particles though ;)
naked singularity is fiction, even if you ´artificially´create a BH. Nobody knows, if there is singularity in the center of a BH at all. Anyhow, Hollywood already showed us, how it looks like. Research for QM, as Sabine does for many years, is the better option.
How do you even conduct a successful experiment on that without causing the end of the world
@@ani_n01 right ani, the danger would be real, but don't worry, it's totally impossible for humans, one need to construct a particle collider with the diameter of the solar system minimum to come to such energy levels. If you would make the Earth a BlackHole, you need to press it to a few millimeters.
@@ani_n01 Black holes are complicated. They require a lot of energy and mass to make. You definitely couldn't do these experiments on Earth.
Modified gravity also has the problem of explaining many apparently low-dark-matter galaxies.
The background image totally looks like a beholder. :)
Thank you Sabine, I love you, never change! The world is a much better place because of you.
Just what is required most in science. Brutal honesty. We can't base important budget decisions on lies. As with all sound decisions in life - junk in, junk out. Keep up the good work Sabine ❤
Many people are going to lose their jobs; we can never agree to what you say!
@@janami-dharmam nothing personal... Resources being limited and all.. WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME LATELY, PHYSICISTS? XD
Guten Tag Sabine, thank you for breaking these down. My mind is a Black-Hole consuming knowledge and working to figure out what the Puzzle will look when completed. But, I've got similarly to Physics, can't wrap my mind around it yet. All the Theories IMHO merely (guesses) keep changing daily or even quicker. And the TRUTH is we don't know enuf, to know we don't know anywhere near enuf, much less everything. If that's even possible, the everything part.
Could you make these little chapters into shorts? That way we can better share them to start a discussion.
Great video, great physicist, strong message thank you
Very strong message. At the same time, I wonder how many physicists go down this route simply to pay their bills - and how sad that reality is.
Many thanks from the entire team!
Love your videos. We need new physics though, and we will have it!
Hmm this would be a perfect lead into a an Amplituhedron video... I would love to hear Sabine's thoughts on it.
I remember coming across a fascinating case involving the detection of a potential variation in the speed of light. But, intriguingly, this didn't lead to a questioning of the theory of relativity. Instead, an innovative approach was taken: redefining how we measure the speed of light. The idea was to base the measurement on the time it takes for light to travel a certain distance. This clever move effectively rendered the speed of light a constant, impervious to any fluctuations.