Karl von Habsburg: Without Ukraine Europe is not completed
2021 ж. 19 Қыр.
8 031 Рет қаралды
III Pan-European Conference in Ukraine: “Ukraine: 30 years on the European path”
The project was implemented with the support of the Federal Ministry of Foreign Affairs based on the decision of the Bundestag of the Federal Republic of Germany through the Hanns Seidel Stiftung Ukraine with the assistance of the “Mediacenter” Directorate of the State Enterprise “Directorate-General for Rendering Services to Diplomatic Missions”.
The conference was attended by young experts and politicians from Ukraine and EU member states to exchange experience and their personal views on the successes and failures of Ukraine's European policy, as well as their ideas on how civil society can contribute to Ukraine's European integration.
This guy's grandfather and great great grand uncle lead Austria-Hungary during WW1 while his great great great great grandfather, the last Holy Roman Emperor, fought Napoleon
His grandpa was 2 years emperor of A-H and last czech king
His line its not illegal
@@cash_only All monarchy lines are illegal, they all began art some point, and killing many others on the way, just as "legal" as they. And if those others would have won, their lines would be the legal ones. Each time they won a war against other noble dinasties, they convinced themselved god wanted them to win the war, so they reign "in the grace of god". They also masacre in the grace of god, and execute oponents in the grace of god. They even kill their brothers or fathers in the grace of god. All monarchies are at first "illegal".
Led ww1? You think he charged head first into the enemy? More like started it and sent millions to the meatgrinder causing millions more to have terrible grief.
This guy is the descendant of Emperors. Literal Emperors of Europe.
Exactly, if the EU became a monarchy, HIMR Karl von Habsburg should be the emperor. Glory to Emperor and King!
@@tschechischelander based
@@newhorizon3229 Karl von Habsburg and Habsburg-Lorraine in general are the most legitimate because their family ruled the Holy Roman Empire continuously from 1438 until 1806 (with a short break between 1742-1745). The EU should build on the HRE, which was its ancestor, and therefore if the EU were to become a hereditary monarchy, the Habsburg-Lorraine dynasty seems to be the best. The fact that they consider themselves Europeans and the father of HIMR Karl von Habsburg HIMR Otto von Habsburg was the head of the International Pan-European Union after the death of Richard Nikolaus Count von Coudenhove-Kalergi also plays into their hands. The European Union as a decentralized federation and a hereditary monarchy (elected monarchies, such as the HRE, do not ensure what we expect from a monarchy, i.e. continuity) would mean a stabilizing and protective element for Europe and its nations, such as Austria-Hungary was in the Central Europe.
Yes, this short round faced, big nosed, brown eyed person, who looks more like a Spaniard or what in Germany they believed Jews should look like, is the "legit" heir to the HR crown. Makes you think.
Most people don’t realize that the Democracy they live in is nothing more than a kingdom run by kings in hiding he is King of Austria Hungary one of the 3 heads of the Eagle. They are the Habsburg, Hohenzollern & Romanov all still very much in play. Kaiser
Emperor, not King.
Could you direct me to information that allows for further investigation of this assertion? Very intrigued, as l note that he emphasizes the importance of personal sanctions and indeed as of this date, that is exactly what is being pursued. Makes me think that he is very influential.
@@bradley6357 even if he was in charge he wouldn't be called "Emperor" anymore, Austria is just one state of majority German people. He would be just King
@@ericcameron3176 trust me bro
And coburg gotha. All of them makes me sick though. We the People do not want and do not need them. Not even one of them.
Had Austria not abolished their monarchy after ww1, this guy would be the Kaiser. And he would probably be good buddies with King Charles III
Fun fact: Both of them are Charles
The globalist halted the monarchies, limited them. Listen to the Benjamin Freedman, 1961 speech, Y T.
@@NewRepublicMapper Yup, Karl is the Germanized name for Carl or Charles. And to make things merrier we could add the current King of Sweden, Carl Gustaf XVI, another “Charles” name related monarch.
Isn't Kaiser a little bit grand for a small nation? In my opinion the title would be Archduke (Erzherzog) instead of Kaiser. You know it's weird to call post WW1 Austria as an Empire/Kaiserreich.
@@DMH-bt2zo really,, Gustav? But they do have the name Karl in Sweden, don't they?
Karl von Habsburg my 14th cousin trice removed .
Kaiser
Kaiser schmarn, das ja.
He doesn't have the Habsburg jowl. Even Sergey Lavrov has the Hapsburg jowl.
His line of Habsburg didn't do too much imbreeding.
jaw*
It’s mainly the Spanish Line that did the most inbreeding and their line mainly died out.
He really not having jaw
🤣
But Habsburger s lower lip is still there!
His name is Karl Habsburg, not Karl von Habsburg
This guy is rooting for the people who dethroned his dynasty from the Austro-Hungarian monarchy a hundred years ago...
The Russians weren’t friends either
This is the would be emperor of the world
Jetzt mach dich doch nicht zum Erfüllungsgehilfen der Hoffaktoren. Oy vey
i would like To know who was born monTh May natural Haicolour blondes red blondes hair? like on phoTos of The Russian Fabergè eggs per example May flower egg forTunaTely my 2nd daughTer has no natural blondes no red blondes hair colour like on ThaT egg
Napoleon, Kaiser Wilhelm II, Kaiser Franz Joseph & Adolf Hitler against Russia. The last two were Austrians!
All of them lost.
- Was not it due to the actions of the anti-Napoleonic coalition that Napoleon lost? The allied forces defeated him in the Battle of the Nations near Leipzig (1813). Therefore, Emperor Napoleon I Bonaparte was defeated by the allied armies of Russia, Austria, Prussia and Sweden. Was not it the Battle of Waterloo (1815) won by Great Britain, Prussia, the Netherlands, Hanover, Nassau and Brunswick-Luneburg, which forced Napoleon to abdicate? - Is it only Russia that fought against the Quadruple Alliance (in particular Kaiser Wilhelm 2 and Franz Joseph I)? Maybe it’s worth reminding you that it was Russia, which made a separate peace treaty with the Quadruple Alliance, the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk in 1918? Did Russia actually sign the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the First World War? - Was not it the USSR (read Russia), which allied Nazi Germany at the beginning of World War II, signing the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (23 August 1939). Didn't they start it together in September 1939 by attacking and dividing Poland? - Later on, during the Second World War, did the USSR (read Russia) fight against Germany exclusively on its own having already become an enemy of Germany, after an attack on itself? P.S. I would like to first hear your attitude to Russia's attack on Ukraine.
Don't include Hitler as an Austrian, he's a dictator of Germany
@@gdipmediacenter2455 I got a simple data and historical rebuttal details for the Russian fan base claim from you! thank you!! Hahahahaha
Look into Major Jordan's diaries from Federal Expression. Dan Smoit, "A Republic, not a Democracy", from Federal Expression. In the Continental USA, in the New England area, and in Central and South Central Louisiana, there are persons of Acadian heritage. The language is English, some do learn French, yet are USA citizens. The same with persons from Mexico, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Argentina, and the Phillippines, to add examples. Generational heritage and are good to have.
So much omitted, so much distorted here. I am an admirer of Habsburgs and their role in history. But I would have never anticipated Habsburg on the same side as outright n&zis. Serving under flags with n&zi symbols, saluting with a raised prone right hand, like n$zis, expressing full fledged n$zi ideas, enjoying pure n$azi ethnic hatred, that is in fact not a result, but a cause of this war. It is very sad eye opening moment for me.
He’s opposed to Russia influence in europe
Look at the events leading up to 1933. The getting persons to work and keeping streets, bridges, and buildings, just a few examples, in working order.
Eastern Europe not allowing the overreaching taking of Westetn civilisation by the opposes of this civilisation. The Ukraine has been, since 08th Century, a part of Russia. Look into the Budapest/Bucharest, 1992 agreement, and the Minsk agreement. The USA and globalist over threw a truly elected President and Mayor's. Moved in Rockets, Artillery, and BSL laboratories, the same to Taiwan and main land China.
He is against Aggression, who is now russian commiting on another Sovereign country
@@CapCody Ukrainian na$is have been commiting agression against their fellow citizens for the last 8 years. First tanks attacking estern Ukraine were the Ukrainian ones. After the people in the east of Ukraine rebelled against illegitimate government of pro-na$i puchists in Kiev. Why na$i sympathisants in Kiev had the right to take guns and overthrow the democraticaly elected president - and take American money for it - while the people in Donbas had not the right to follow the example of the pro-na$i puchists? Except they rebelled against the na$i puchists, not legitimate and democraticaly elected head of state.
Without Russia europe is not whole, Ukraine is just «Little Russia»
Absolutely !
I would rather say that Kiev is the Rus and Muscovy is a latter wannabe extension.