Top 5 most Disastrous Battles that led to the Fall of Rome.

2024 ж. 16 Мам.
6 702 Рет қаралды

⚔️ SPQR Shop, excellent hand-crafted Roman rings and other items:
spqrshop.com/?sca_ref=4770010...
Enter the code "Maiorianus" to get a 20% discount on every purchase. The ideal present for any fan of Rome 😉!
🔴 YOU WANT TO SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL? 🔴
🤗 Join our Patreon community: / maiorianus
Or become an official Maiorianus member on KZhead: / maiorianus461
🎁 The official Maiorianus merch store is now OPEN:
maiorianus.myspreadshop.com
🤗 One-Time Donation?
- PayPal: paypal.me/Maiorianus
- Bitcoin: bc1qv4lsfsplvfecrrgvmfclhga28we7mvh9563xdj
🔗 Share the video with anyone who might be interested (it helps a ton!)
The wonderful background music is by Adrian von Ziegler: • Relaxing Roman Music -...
Disclosures: Some links in the description are affiliate links which means that if you purchase something by clicking on one of them, your host Sebastian will receive a small commission at no additional cost to you. In this way you will be supporting the channel to improve the video production quality at no extra cost to you.
📬 Contact us: maiorianus.sebastian@gmail.com
#Maiorianus

Пікірлер
  • ⚔ SPQR Shop, excellent hand-crafted Roman rings and other items: spqrshop.com?sca_ref=4770010.FM16q4LJHr Enter the code "Maiorianus" to get a 20% discount on every purchase. The ideal present for any fan of Rome 😉!

    @Maiorianus_Sebastian@Maiorianus_Sebastian4 ай бұрын
    • Again a great video, one question, are you not the Hyperloop guy? I am just curious.

      @stevenblack7928@stevenblack79283 ай бұрын
    • Hadrian’s video link isn’t in the description, Dominus.

      @LordWyatt@LordWyatt3 ай бұрын
  • Many historians in the world, such as Mary Beard and Ian Hughes, believe that Flavius Aetius won the battle on the “Catalan Fields”, and his victory is indicated by such facts as: 1) The failed siege of the city of Orleans by the Huns. 2) Attila’s losses in the battle were greater, which is why he and the remnants of his army retreated from Gaul, thanks to which the spoils from the battlefield went to Aetius. Which became a symbol of his victory over Attila. Prosper, Jordanes and Gregory of Tours wrote about this. 3) The Roman vassal Merovey became the king of the Franks. And not his older brother, who was a vassal of the Huns!

    @user-kf3dg3ud5m@user-kf3dg3ud5m3 ай бұрын
  • It’s crazy how little credit the Vandals get for causing the Fall of Rome

    @Avinkwep@Avinkwep3 ай бұрын
    • Maybe, but their name has gone down I'm history a a synonym for destroying or defacing with no other purpose than that, even by people who couldn't tell you who the Vandalls were, if their lives depended on it.

      @andreweaston1779@andreweaston17793 ай бұрын
    • @@andreweaston1779 ya that was because of that time they sacked Rome pretty good because of that Princess

      @Avinkwep@Avinkwep3 ай бұрын
    • Ikr! They should sue!

      @eriksturdevant8589@eriksturdevant8589Ай бұрын
  • The ease with which Belisarius conquered the Vandal Kingdom in North Africa in 534 (using only 16,000 soldiers), showed how weak the Western Empire had become.

    @michaelporzio7384@michaelporzio73843 ай бұрын
    • Or alternatively, it showed how skilled belisarius was in war

      @clongshanks5206@clongshanks52063 ай бұрын
    • Maioranus would have conquered the vandals easily if the ships wouldn’t have burned in the harbor 😢

      @obiwankenobi07@obiwankenobi073 ай бұрын
    • It had been 100 years or so. It could also just show how... civilized... the vandals had become, maybe.

      @andreweaston1779@andreweaston17793 ай бұрын
    • Geiseric' biography dwarfs any Hollywood script. All his ventures were doomed to fail but he succeeded again and again and again. Roman emperors came and died, but Geiseric ruled for 50 years.

      @doppelwaffen@doppelwaffen3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@doppelwaffenTime and again, he made the Romans look like idiots, and proved to be the bane of their existence. I still firmly believe the loss of Africa doomed the Western Roman empire in the long term.

      @septimiusseverus343@septimiusseverus3433 ай бұрын
  • Battle of Mursa Major is maybe the most underrated civil war battle by the Romans. The lost of good soldiers in the west and east were never really replaced. The Roman armys strength and quality was never the same after it.

    @christopherevans2445@christopherevans24453 ай бұрын
    • The Constantinian and early Valentinian dynasties were pretty hard on the troops. Chrysopolis, Mursa Major, and Julian's campaign each caused the deaths of tens of thousands. And then Valentinian himself dies in 375 and Adrianople in 378. Even the Crisis didn't see that many major defeats in a 50 year span.

      @geordiejones5618@geordiejones56183 ай бұрын
    • Indeed, battle of Mursa in 351 was a HUGE loss of Roman manpower (about 50k soldiers dead)! Battle at Adrianople in 378 had less than 20k roman casualties

      @tsonobi@tsonobi3 ай бұрын
  • I'd love to see a coop on Late Roman warfare between Maiorianus and Schwerpunkt

    @antoniomoreira5921@antoniomoreira59213 ай бұрын
    • Why Schwerpunkt? It takes him 2 hours to cover a topic that better KZheadrs can break down much quicker, and you have to filter out his fanboy attitude in between the actual analysis. Every so often he has a specific video that's interesting but he would do himself a favor by heavily editing his work. Thersites the Historian and The Historian's Craft are both academic quality with much more polish in terms of breaking down concepts and organization their thoughts.

      @geordiejones5618@geordiejones56183 ай бұрын
  • Ive learned more about Roman history from you than from my History teacher in school. Thank you. (I was born in Barcino, Hispania, and can trace my ancestry to the Romans)

    @DefiantAML@DefiantAML3 ай бұрын
  • I disagree with your view on the Battle of Catalaunian Plains; what was the alternative? For sure would include it on that list.

    @Seb.eu589@Seb.eu5893 ай бұрын
  • Excellent list and description of their respective significance. It’s probably more compelling to think that after the late 4th Century the Western Romans were even able to hang on for another 80 years or so. 🤔🤨

    @gumbie007@gumbie0073 ай бұрын
  • Another wonderful presentation!

    @lesliea7394@lesliea73943 ай бұрын
  • Great video

    @thomascatty379@thomascatty3793 ай бұрын
  • This was a particularly excellent analysis.

    @zwatwashdc@zwatwashdc3 ай бұрын
  • Another great video! Thanks!

    @daveweiss5647@daveweiss56473 ай бұрын
  • It was an informative and wonderful presentation 👏🏻 👌 👍🏻

    @mohammedsaysrashid3587@mohammedsaysrashid35873 ай бұрын
  • I love your content Maiorianus. I wish I could donate now, but when I can, I will.

    @alextaunton3099@alextaunton30993 ай бұрын
  • Hi. I could not fin the link to the Hadrian channel in the description. I am interested.

    @chmendez@chmendez3 ай бұрын
  • Where is the link to the animated channel guy?

    @miguelinop@miguelinop3 ай бұрын
  • In 407 AD Stilicho's Gothic wars were over and Rome had won. Yet Stilicho kept the troops in Italy, planning to join Alaric for an invasion of the east Roman empire, which according to Zosimus was scrubbed due to the usurpation of Constantine. It seems that even Stilicho was more concerned about Constantine than about the barbarians. Unfortunately, the court in Ravenna took some very stupid decisions.

    @doppelwaffen@doppelwaffen3 ай бұрын
    • The Imperial Court in Ravenna played STUPID GAMES, and won STUPID PRIZES !!

      @aleksandarvil5718@aleksandarvil57183 ай бұрын
  • Second day in asking you whether you can make a video on Balkan Romans🇷🇴👍🏻

    @InAeternumRomaMater@InAeternumRomaMater3 ай бұрын
    • Liking your comment, cause Balkan Romans are underrated. Since the Hunnic invasion, people just think all of them were killed, but they continued existing, and their heritage today lies in Romania. God bless, and a hug from Brazil.

      @arcaniteplays-blackdeath-5218@arcaniteplays-blackdeath-52183 ай бұрын
    • I don’t want to ruin it for you but hummmm Romania mostly inherited language, but not that much else from the romans

      @me67galaxylife@me67galaxylife3 ай бұрын
    • @@arcaniteplays-blackdeath-5218 🇷🇴❤️🇧🇷🏛🦅💯

      @InAeternumRomaMater@InAeternumRomaMater3 ай бұрын
    • @@me67galaxylife I don't want to be rude here, but it is ironic when someone tries to teach a Romanian about what is Roman about us....but you are right about one thing I give you that, that our language comes from the Romans. However, our ethnic identity, our traditions, our ethnic history and our toponyms comes from them. Our ethnic identity which is _Român_ etymologically still means "Citizen of Rome" is inherited from Rōmānus which is Roman. Two examples of traditions from Roman paganism is Mărțișor and Sânziana, being for the Roman God of war and agriculture Mars and goddess of the moon, hunt, animals and fertility Diana. "Mărțișor" means "Little Mars" and comes from Feriae Martis celebrated on 1 of March, it was adopted by the North Macedonians and Bulgarians too. Sânziana comes from "Sancta Diana" (Old Romanian: Sândziana), and is also in our folklore. Then many toponyms has been inherited from latin, unfortunately some were changed such as the former name "Darstor" from "Dorostolon" where Aetius was born but was changed with Silistria, the Constanța from Constantines sister, and Timocu from "Timacus" where Galerius, Constantine, Licinius and Maximinus Daia (among others) were born still inhabited by Romanians.

      @InAeternumRomaMater@InAeternumRomaMater3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@InAeternumRomaMater Oh so being romanian gives you a definitve edge on the matter ? No because it's funny but anyone can look up the subject and being romanian does not give you anything another person wouldn't have. Let's consider that : The word romanian has some very serious chances of not being related to the romans until the 19th century and the rise of romanians nationalities, where the similiarity of the word was used to try and define a link to the romans. Regardless it's not really an argument because as said the language stayed, so it's irrelevant. Romanians are genetically more or less identical to slavic populations too, and had many, many slavic words and influence in culture... Until the 19th century, when it was decided that romanian should be "re-latinised". They weren't even using the roman alphabet before. You are right in saying the "ethnic identity" comes from them as it was built as such in the 19th century. However, historically, it is much, much more complicated than that.

      @me67galaxylife@me67galaxylife3 ай бұрын
  • I really think the Arab Conquests (and the battles therein) ended Rome for good, it no longer had the grain from Egypt to feed itself and the benefit of trade through the Red Sea which made imports through there more expensive as the Arabs collected their own duties and tariffs along those routes. Not to mention, the Mediterranean was no longer a Mare Nostrum and became a hotbed of piracy not seen since the times of the Republic. At least prior to that, Emperors like Justinian were slowly clawing back the Western territories, regardless of whatever fate the Western Roman Empire had. The Arab Conquests made it virtually impossible by not only taking wealthy provinces with them, but putting those provinces under a new hostile rival. Plus the old pre-Islamic Eastern Roman borders were easier to defend with the various desserts surrounding whilst Anatolia had to be fortified in many places to mitigate invasion and was unsustainable ultimately.

    @giansideros@giansideros3 ай бұрын
    • So you could say that the sassanids did in a way bleeding themselves out with the romans

      @me67galaxylife@me67galaxylife3 ай бұрын
  • Where is the link to hadrian?

    @vinodpaul9596@vinodpaul95963 ай бұрын
    • youtube.com/@studiohadrian?si=ztNNgeEXY9lvBR2l

      @noone7206@noone72063 ай бұрын
  • Battle of the Savin is battle of Mursa right ?

    @ulfricsombrage@ulfricsombrage3 ай бұрын
  • I feel like your videos would be more popular if you titled the as Fall of Rome like this one instead of Western Roman Empire. Your Majorian video for example could’ve been “The Emperor who tried to save the Roman Empire” and I think would’ve sounded more appealing

    @Avinkwep@Avinkwep3 ай бұрын
    • Why should he repeat Gibbons mistakes?

      @bobflemming100@bobflemming1003 ай бұрын
    • @@bobflemming100 For revenue. It's KZhead, c'mon, clickbait is the name of the game. You could clickbait in the title and in the video explain that Gibbons is wrong, for example.

      @ThePussukka@ThePussukka3 ай бұрын
    • @@bobflemming100 I was once talking to a woman at a coffee shop and she made the point that just because Mongolia still exists doesn’t mean the Mongol empire didn’t fall. I think the Byzantine Empire is the same way, that even though it still existed that doesn’t mean there was still a Roman Empire

      @Avinkwep@Avinkwep3 ай бұрын
    • ​@@Avinkwepi agree with your original comment, but I strongly (tho respectfully) disagree with your follow-up comment. The Mongolia analogy is not really applicable to the Eastern Empire because the Eastern Empire was still THE Roman Empire, just the surviving Eastern remnant. The Mongolia analogy would be accurate if the question was about whether modern Italy could be considered to be the Roman Empire, but with regards to Mongolia, the point would be more like saying that the Yuan Dynasty doesn't count as being the Mongol Empire when it clearly was. Sure the

      @TALessman@TALessman3 ай бұрын
    • *As a side note, KZhead's comment system (at least on my phone's app) had suddenly become buggy and won't let me complete my previous comment). *Sighs*

      @TALessman@TALessman3 ай бұрын
  • If possible, I'd like to know what happened to my hometown of Cremona in the last years of the West and the Gothic War. I know what happened from foundation to the Year of the Four Emperors, and that it resisted the Lombards for a long time before being razed, but not what happened during the Fall of the West and the Gothic War.

    @lordMartiya@lordMartiya3 ай бұрын
  • What total war mod is this ?

    @nestororozco827@nestororozco8273 ай бұрын
  • I really wonder how much the cultural split between church and pagans played a part

    @MattieK09@MattieK093 ай бұрын
  • @kimberlyperrotis8962@kimberlyperrotis89623 ай бұрын
  • The battle of Armageddon will be fought with swords and horses, from the prophesy it seems like the solar storm will set back humanity to pre electricity. Also prophesy Rome will become the capital of the world with the leader ascended wearing a toga. Can't wait to live during that time when our love for the Roman empire will be reality.

    @kyleanuar9090@kyleanuar90903 ай бұрын
    • A solar storm won't remove electricity forever. You can just repair the damage. Also people will still have the knowledge of what electricity is and how to generate it.

      @jpaulc441@jpaulc4413 ай бұрын
  • 😢

    @ahsokasan8175@ahsokasan81753 ай бұрын
  • It's very important to mention that vizigoths at Adrianopol are not invaders in this moment, they a migrants 😂. Valens was to stupid...

    @viocastorulcalator5664@viocastorulcalator56643 ай бұрын
    • Yeah but it also his officers' fault too For forcing the Goths to exchange their kids for food If only the Romans just accepted them as citizens

      @ACIron-en6ij@ACIron-en6ij3 ай бұрын
  • If Emperor Justinian decided to favor the construction projects similar to the Hagia Sophia more instead of reclaiming the territories that are now occupied by the Germanic tribes, will his descendants have more money to pay for the troops to defend the southern frontiers from the Arabs by the 7th century?

    @lerneanlion@lerneanlion3 ай бұрын
    • IMO the time frame is too long. That money would have been spent in some other way in the intervening time.

      @andreweaston1779@andreweaston17793 ай бұрын
    • The majority of it would have gone against the Sassanid war 602-628 and they still would have been weak against the Arabs. Heraclius is still amazing because Rome still survived despite the Arab invasion.

      @selucusptolemy3149@selucusptolemy31493 ай бұрын
  • collapse of the population was the cause for the lack of troops and revenue

    @canemcave@canemcave3 ай бұрын
  • In the earlier times, I felt that people would just gift to defend Rome. The late Romans seem so peaceful and unwilling to raise another army, why? -The barbarians didnt kill as many romans as Hannibal did. and if the barbarians did, at that time the population of all Rome was much larger and with a way better infrastructure. Like, I dont undertand this. Conscription should have occurred.

    @FieldHoodGaming@FieldHoodGaming3 ай бұрын
    • I want to add, Conscription would of ended the need to pay for military forces again maybe having some type of governmental change. If you think about it, everyone else used Conscription except the romans then after. In this case, the Roman state failed to evolve. In modern times, countries use military conscription when absolutely necessary.

      @FieldHoodGaming@FieldHoodGaming3 ай бұрын
  • Frist

    @Narses_the_aremnian@Narses_the_aremnian3 ай бұрын
  • Am I the only one who hates the AI art in his vids? It makes the content feel mass-produced and cheap.

    @ari3903@ari39033 ай бұрын
  • They lost the culture wars to the greeks and they lost the actual wars to germanics. Plain and simple.

    @jasonmuniz-contreras6630@jasonmuniz-contreras66303 ай бұрын
  • 😢

    @ahsokasan8175@ahsokasan81753 ай бұрын
  • 😢

    @ahsokasan8175@ahsokasan81753 ай бұрын
KZhead