Amy reveals six topics discussed by Gary Bettman and the NHL general managers at this week's meetings in Florida; are there any big changes coming to hockey next year?
📝Read our written content on The Hockey News! thn.com/montreal
⭐️Watch This Next: • Hear What David Reinba...
DraftKings Promo Code: THPN
tinyurl.com/DRAFTKINGSPROMOTHPN
===========================
Subscribe and Listen to our Podcasts HERE:
===========================
►Canadiens Connection: www.canadiensconnection.fm/
►The Press Zone: www.thepresszone.fm/
===========================
Connect with us!
===========================
►Follow us on X/Twitter! / rocketsports
►Follow Canadiens Connection podcast: / habsconnection
►Facebook: / habsconnection
►Instagram: / habsconnection
SUBSCRIBE to this channel for more weekly videos about the Montreal Canadiens.
🔔 @allhabs / allhabs
QUESTION OF THE WEEK: What are you hoping to see from David Reinbacher in his time with the Laval Rocket this season?
SUPPORT our content!
►Please consider making a donation to support our independent sports content and to help us train and provide experience to the talented journalists of the future: www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted...
⏰ Timecodes ⏰
00:00 - Introduction
00:24 - Gary Bettman & Colin Campbell
01:14 - NHL Meeting Topic 1
02:51 - NHL Meeting Topic 2
03:23 - NHL Meeting Topic 3
04:01 - NHL Meeting Topic 4
05:34 - NHL Meeting Topic 5
06:54 - NHL Meeting Topic 6
08:18 - Amy's Reaction
09:17 - What's all the buzz around the Montreal Canadiens?
#Habs #GoHabsGo #Canadiens
About this video: The NHL general managers conducted their annual Florida meetings this week to discuss the state of the league and debate any proposed changes to rules. Amy reveals six of the bigger topics that came out of those meetings, discusses when they might take effect, and gives her thoughts and reaction to the ideas put forth.
An original video production by Rocket Sports.
©️ Rocket Sports Media | Unauthorized use prohibited
Agree with the expanded video review. However, after Armia's recent penalty I concluded that the officials had misinterpreted the rule as it is written. That brings me to the main point of my comment-- the rule is poorly articulated (I looked it up after the Armia penalty). It needs to be redone. Everyone focuses on "players must be in control of their stick" and overlook the meaning of the word "carry" within the context of the rule. One must take care to interpret the rule and infer its intent from the entirety of the text, not just one phrase. Re-writing the rule might not result in a text that is immediately comprehensible upon first glance, but that shouldn't be the goal. The goal should be a text that is complete and unambiguous after a careful reading.
Why don't shootout goals count in the player stats? They do for 3 on 3, which is a bit easier to score than 5 on 5. It's sad that a scoring play does not count for a player. Does goals scored on a goalie not count in shootouts....
Hard to believe there was no penalty for a goalie dislodging a net?
I'm not a fan of overtime or shootouts. Instead, I believe a penalized player should serve their full penalty duration, irrespective of how many goals are scored against their team while they're short-handed.
Agree with you on that one!
Well, we ARE talking about that creepy little Bettman...so anything may or may not happen 😬